This study investigates the relationship between scientific validity and fair subject selection in clinical trials, focusing on recruitment practices. By analyzing 200 clinical trials across oncology, cardiology, and neurology, this research identifies key barriers to diversity and assesses the effectiveness of institutional policies in promoting equitable recruitment. The findings reveal that despite efforts to improve inclusivity, demographic disparities persist, particularly in terms of racial and ethnic representation. Recruitment barriers, including logistical challenges, mistrust among minority groups, and insufficient outreach resources, are prevalent, with oncology trials exhibiting the most significant issues related to minority participation. Additionally, the study highlights that stronger Institutional Review Board (IRB) policies with enforced diversity guidelines lead to higher minority representation in trials. Through a mixed-methods approach, combining systematic trial reviews, surveys of recruitment personnel, and institutional policy assessments, the study emphasizes the importance of community engagement and culturally competent recruitment strategies. The research suggests that while progress has been made, greater transparency, targeted outreach, and mandatory diversity tracking are necessary to achieve equitable and scientifically valid clinical trial outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for future research to explore technological innovations and broader therapeutic areas, offering potential solutions for overcoming the barriers to diversity in clinical trials.
Read full abstract