Recovery Of Lower Extremity Function Research Articles

Minimally invasive surgery supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) arthroplasty.

The benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well known, but concerns about applying SuperPATH in patients with secondary OA of acetabular dysplasia do not have been reported. We aim to evaluate whether SuperPATH is applicable to secondary OA, furthermore, to quantify the recovery of lower extremity function. 30 patients with secondary OA admitted for THA applying SuperPATH were investigated. Clinical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and radiographical evaluation were performed. Following was examined pre- and early post-operatively; pain level, blood tests, TUG and 10-M walking time for lower limb recovery. Preoperative radiographic measurements revealed an average Sharp angle of 46.2 ± 2.8 degrees and CE angle of 19.4 ± 7.3 degrees. 29 THAs had Crowe Type I and 1 THA had Crowe Type II. JOA score improved from 48.8 preoperatively to 91.5 at 2 months postoperatively. The perioperative pain assessment (VAS) averaged 7.0±1.5 preoperatively, 4.6±2.6 on the first postoperative day, then decreased gradually to 1.2±1.4 at 2 weeks. Blood data showed that creatine kinase, myoglobin, and CRP were significantly elevated on the day after surgery, but they normalized at 2 weeks postoperatively. Both TUG and 10M walking time showed slightly higher values at 1 week postoperatively compared to preoperatively but recovered to the same level as preoperatively at 2 weeks after surgery. Our data suggests that SuperPATH approach to THA for dysplastic OA was applicable to mildly dysplastic OA and achieved an early recovery of lower limb function.

Effectiveness of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation vs. neuromuscular electrical stimulation for recovery of lower extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) vs. neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for motor recovery of the lower extremity in patients with subacute stroke. Seventy patients within 6 months post-stroke were randomly assigned to the CCFES group (n = 35) and the NMES group (n = 35). Both groups underwent routine rehabilitation plus 20-min electrical stimulation (CCFES or NMES) on ankle dorsiflexion muscles per day, 5 days a week, for 3 weeks. Ankle AROM (dorsiflexion), Fugl-Meyer assessment-lower extremity (FMA-LE), Barthel Index (BI), Functional Ambulation Category scale (FAC), 10-meter walking test, and surface electromyography (sEMG) were assessed at the baseline and at the end of the intervention. Ten patients did not complete the study (five in CCFES and five in NMES), so only 60 patients were analyzed in the end. After the 3-week intervention, FMA-LE, BI, Ankle AROM (dorsiflexion), and FAC increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Patients in the CCFES group showed significantly greater improvements only in the measurement of Fugl-Meyer assessment-lower extremity compared with the NMES group after treatment (p < 0.05). The improvement in sEMG response of tibialis anterior by CCFES was greater than NMES (p < 0.05). Contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation can effectively improve the motor function of the lower limbs better than conventional neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subacute patients after stroke, but the effect on improving the ability to walk, such as walking speed, was not good. http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR2100045423.

Endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression

To improve treatment outcomes in patients with sciatic nerve neuropathy. The first results of endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression in 6 patients with sciatic neuropathy (mean age 47±6.7 years) are presented. The authors developed and described new and unique technique for this procedure. All patients suffered severe neuropathic pain syndrome with neurologic disorders. All patients underwent endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression in prone position. Mean VAS score of preoperative pain syndrome was 7.8±0.37. In 3 months after surgery, this value decreased up to 1.5 scores. Complete regression of pain syndrome and significant reduction of neurologic symptoms were noted in 5 out of 6 patients (83%). Primary data characterize the developed method as an easy, minimally invasive and effective procedure for pain relief and fast recovery of lower extremity function in these patients.

Effect of Early and Intensive Rehabilitation after Ischemic Stroke on Functional Recovery of the Lower Limbs: A Pilot, Randomized Trial

Objective: We aimed to develop an early and intense lower extremity training technique using a recumbent cycle ergometer system in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This was a pilot, prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2 parallel groups followed for 3 months with blinded assessment of outcomes. Thirty-one eligible patients were randomized to experimental and control groups. To strengthen the motion of the lower extremities within 48 hours after stroke, the control and experimental groups received conventional treatment and additional interventions under a therapist's guidance combined with conventional treatment, respectively. The primary outcome measure was the change in lower extremity motor control from admission to 4 weeks, assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Secondary outcomes were the number of days to walking 50 m and the change in the Berg Balance Scale score and Barthel index. The modified Rankin Score was used to assess the overall function and prognosis at 3 months. Results: Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Berg Balance Scale scores and Barthel index increased over time in the experimental group, as did the Berg Balance Scale score and Barthel index in the control group (P < .001). However, Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores in the control group were similar over time (F = 2.303, P = 1.119). Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group after 2 and 4 weeks (P = .084 and .037, respectively). Compared with the control group at 2 weeks or at discharge, the percentage of patients who returned to unassisted walking in the experimental group showed an increasing trend (56.3% versus 26.67%, P = .095), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .598). The modified Rankin Score at 3 months showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Our early and intense lower extremity training technique involving a leg cycle ergometer system contributes to the recovery of lower extremity function in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This finding will provide a basis for future investigations on the applicability of the intervention in early lower extremity and walking rehabilitation among individuals with neurological disorder.

Association Between Interleukin‐6 and Lower Extremity Function After Hip Fracture—The Role of Muscle Mass and Strength

To examine whether an effect on muscle mass or strength explains the association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) and lower extremity function in the year after hip fracture. Analysis of data from a longitudinal cohort study. Two Baltimore-area hospitals. Community-dwelling women aged 65 and older admitted to one of two hospitals in Baltimore with a new, nonpathological fracture of the proximal femur between 1992 and 1995. At 2, 6, and 12 months postfracture, serum IL-6, appendicular lean muscle mass (aLM), and grip strength were measured, and the Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS), a summary measure of performance of nine lower extremity tasks was calculated. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the longitudinal relationship between IL-6 tertile and LEGS. Whether muscle mass or strength explained the relationship between IL-6 and LEGS was examined by adding measures of aLM, grip strength, or both into the model. Subjects in the lowest IL-6 group performed better on the LEGS than those in the highest tertile by 4.51 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.50-7.52) points at 12 months postfracture. Adjusting for aLM and grip strength, this difference was 4.28 points (95% CI=1.14-7.43) and 3.81 points (95% CI=0.63-7.00), respectively. Adjusting for both aLM and grip strength, the mean difference in LEGS score was 3.88 points (95% CI=0.63-7.13). In older women, after hip fracture, reduced muscle strength, rather than reduced muscle mass, better explains the poorer recovery of lower extremity function observed with higher levels of the inflammatory marker IL-6.

Persistent Changes in Interleukin-6 and Lower Extremity Function Following Hip Fracture

A hip fracture often heralds a period of functional decline in elderly persons. Although an inflammatory reaction would be expected following a hip fracture, whether the degree of this response is associated with adverse functional outcomes is unknown. In a cohort from the Baltimore Hip Studies, women aged 65 years or older with a hip fracture were evaluated at 3 or 10 days (baseline) and 2, 6, and 12 months (follow-up) postfracture. Serum was analyzed for interleukin-6 (IL-6) level. A score of timed performance of 9 tasks, the Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS) was calculated at each evaluation. We divided participants into tertiles based on their cytokine levels at 2, 6, and 12 months, and examined the LEGS score trajectories as a function of IL-6 tertile using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for age, prefracture function, body fat, pain, cognitive function, type of surgical repair, the number of in-hospital complications, and the number of comorbid medical conditions. At baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively, 149, 95, 101, and 82 participants provided serum samples; of these participants 65, 78, and 59 also provided a LEGS measure at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months postfracture the median (interquartile range) of serum IL-6 levels was 7.4 (4.0, 15.9) pg/mL. Participants in the lowest tertile of IL-6 level performed better on the LEGS than did those in the highest tertile (p =.008). At 12 months postfracture, participants in the lowest tertile scored 5.3 points better (95% confidence interval, 2.0-8.6) on the LEGS than did those in the highest tertile (p =.002). Higher IL-6 levels are adversely associated with recovery of lower extremity function after hip fracture. Factors that predict cytokine response and the potential mechanisms by which this effect is mediated warrant further study.

Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging.

To determine whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging quantification of cervical spinal cord damage improves the prediction of motor recovery after spinal cord injury. The extent of cervical spinal cord injury was measured on MR images obtained in 104 patients (aged 17-70 years) within 72 hours of spinal cord injury. The effects of hemorrhage and edema length on motor outcome were examined for at least 12 months. Patients with spinal cord hemorrhage had significantly lower upper and lower extremity motor scores at the time of injury and at 12 months than did patients without hemorrhage (P < .001). There was little recovery of lower extremity function even in patients without hemorrhage. Upper extremity motor function improved significantly in all patients (P < .001); patients without hemorrhage showed the largest improvements. The motor recovery rates for patients without hemorrhage were 0.74 (upper extremities; range, 0-1) and 0.55 (lower extremities; range, 0-1); those for patients with hemorrhage were 0.31 (range, 0-1) and 0.091 (range, 0-1). Stepwise multiple regression analyses indicated that MR information on hemorrhage and the length of edema increases the ability to predict clinical outcome by 16%-33% over that with initial clinical scores alone. An initial MR imaging evaluation of the spinal cord after spinal cord injury provides supplemental prognostic information on the recovery of motor function in the upper and lower extremities.