Reconstructive Ladder Research Articles

Algorithm of surgical treatment for diaphyseal defects of the forearm bones due to gunshot injuries

Introduction In the current system of providing medical aid to wounded servicemen, along with the conservative primary surgical treatment and minimally invasive extrafocal fixation, high-tech surgical interventions of considerable complexity with the use of additive and tissue-engineering technologies have been coming to the forefront. It is necessary to determine their place in the current algorithm of limb bone defect management, which was the substantiation of our study.The purpose of the study was to improve the algorithm for selecting a treatment method for patients with associated gunshot defects of the forearm based on the literature and clinical observations.Materials and Methods We analyzed scientific articles in PubMed and Scientific Electronic Library (eLIBRARY.ru) platforms, published from 2004 to 2024, on the basis of which we could refine the algorithm of treatment method selection for patients with associated gunshot defects of the forearm. The developed algorithm was used to treat 178 patients with gunshot fractures of the forearm.Results The review of the literature established the main provisions and principles that are applied in the reconstruction of the forearm with an associated defect. When choosing the method of bone defect management, a great number of authors tend to build a “reconstructive ladder”, moving from less severe (one bone) and extended defects (small defect up to 2 cm) to more complex (both bones) and massive defect (more than 10 cm). Upon having considered the revealed regularities, we improved the algorithm of surgical treatment of the latter, which is based on two classification principles: defect extention and location. Reconstruction of the forearm as a dynamic system after diaphyseal fractures requires consider the state of the radioulnar joint. The function of the latter depends on the length ratio of the radius and ulna bones. Therefore, we substantiated small (up to 2 cm) forearm bone defects that can be managed by simple surgical methods. Another fundamental addition to the algorithm was the allocation of a patients’ group with a defect of one forearm bone and a fracture of the other bone (defect-fracture); this combination allows avoiding complex surgical methods for reconstruction and use segment shortening.Discussion The treatment of associated forearm defects is challenging, the choice of reconstruction technique remains uncertain, and the required consensus is lacking. Several forearm reconstruction techniques are available, yet there is no reliable evidence of their effectiveness in terms of treatment time, complications, reoperations, and functional recovery.Conclusion The algorithm proposed for the treatment of extensive gunshot-associated defects of the forearm allows us to consider the change in the anatomy, make a surgical plan based on the reconstruction vector, and select optimal surgical techniques.

Initial experience with ovine forestomach matrix graft for glossectomy defect reconstruction: A case series

Soft tissue reconstruction of oral cavity defects, such as glossectomy defects secondary to malignancy, pose a challenge for head and neck, oral, and maxillofacial surgeons. Reconstruction options for mucosal defects include primary closure, healing by secondary intention, full mucosal and split-thickness skin grafts, pedicled flaps, and microvascular free flaps. Biological grafts have become an integral part of the modern reconstructive ladder and are widely used for the regeneration of various soft tissue defects, including oral defects. This case series describes our initial experience using ovine forestomach matrix grafts in tongue and oral cavity reconstruction. Oral reconstruction using ovine forestomach matrix grafts was undertaken on three patients post wide excision and resulted in good functional and cosmetic outcomes. The rate of tissue formation provided by the graft and the grafts’ relative resistance to the hostile environment of the oral cavity support further clinical research to validate the use of these devices in oral reconstruction.

Are There Differences in Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes Among Surgical Subspecialists Performing Lower Extremity Flap Procedures? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Analysis of 1324 Patients

Introduction: Soft tissue flaps are an integral and versatile tool to help manage soft tissue defects of varying severities. These complex procedures can be done by a variety of specialties and can lead to a variety of postoperative complications. Locoregional flaps are the middle rung of the reconstructive ladder and can be performed by surgeons of various training pathways. The profile of patients and their complications when stratified by surgical specialty is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term postoperative outcomes between surgical subspecialists performing a locoregional flap of the lower extremity to determine factors influencing complication rates. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology code 15,738 to identify adult patients undergoing a muscle, myocutaneous, or fasciocutaneous lower extremity flap procedure from 2016 to 2019. We examined the primary outcome of a pooled wound complication rate with secondary outcomes including the individual NSQIP wound- and nonwound complications. Results: A total of 1324 patients were identified. Plastic surgeons performed 926 (70%) procedures, general surgeons performed 243 (18%) procedures, orthopedic surgeons performed 89 (7%) procedures, and vascular surgeons performed 66 (5%) procedures. On multivariate analysis, surgical subspecialty was not associated with the primary outcome, but malignancy-related operations and nonelective status were considered significant. Conclusions: Patient characteristics, but not surgeon subspecialty, account for the variation in patient outcomes in lower extremity flap reconstruction. Larger, prospective studies examining these outcomes are needed to further characterize complication risk factors in this patient population.

Editorial Comment: Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease

Editorial Comment: Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease

Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease

Objective: Reconstruction of transplant ureteral stricture disease (USD) is a challenging surgical problem. In this article, we review our reconstructive ladder for robotic reconstruction of transplant USD and report our outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing robotic transplant reimplantation for USD after kidney transplantation at our institution between 11/2021 and 3/2023. Only patients with at least 1-year follow-up were included. The first rung of our reconstructive ladder is a side-to-side nontransecting reimplant. We prefer this method whenever possible because it avoids transection of the ureter, preserving the fragile blood supply. When this technique is not possible, because of long stricture length and/or limited bladder mobility, we proceed to the second rung of our reconstructive ladder, a Boari flap reconstruction. Surgical success in our cohort was defined as being hardware-free without evidence of ureteral obstruction on imaging. Results: There were 6 patients in our cohort: 3 underwent side-to-side reconstruction and 3 underwent Boari flap reconstruction. Median console time was 139 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 85-175), estimated blood loss was 25 milliliters (IQR 25-81), and length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-3). We had one major (Clavien ≥ III) complication, which was an intensive care unit transfer postoperatively for hypertension requiring a nicardipine drip. Median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 13-18) with a 100% surgical success rate. Conclusion: Utilization of a reconstructive ladder for management of transplant USD may allow for a systematic approach based on reconstructive principles. Our approach was associated with excellent intermediate-term outcomes.

Double opposing five flaps as an easy way to correct post burn band contracture

Post burn contracture usually need interference mostly for functional or cosmetic correction. Release and skin graft is the first option in the reconstructive ladder; it has its drawbacks either re-contracture or pigmentation of the graft. Release and flap coverage when available is the best. Free flaps, at a time, was the best and last option in the reconstructive ladder. Still, it is the most expensive surgery that consumes a long time for flap raising, anastomosis of its vessels, in addition to donner site morbidity, the need for stages of defatening and the possibility of failure.Local flaps if available is the easiest technique for all plastic surgeons even the beginners. Back to basic: advancement, transposition and rotation flap are easy for any plastic surgeon. Linear scaring or contracture usually can be corrected by Z plasty or multiple Z if long. Sometimes double opposing Z plasties (5 flaps release) is used if one side of the line is healthy and the other is scared.Z plasty and its varieties are not enough to correct very broad band contracture since its release usually develops large defect. In that case even the free flap alone is not enough; split skin graft is mandatory to complete the defect coverage.Our technique is only for band contracture that neither very broad nor linear, and is surrounded by healthy skin, that technique is double opposing 5 flap (DO5F) release.

Optimizing Morbidity in Unplanned Soft Tissue Sarcoma Excisions: Should We Skip the Reconstructive Ladder?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare and diverse primary malignant tumors that comprise approximately 1% of all malignancies. Misdiagnoses and unplanned excisions of STSs are common due to the tumor's rarity, leading to secondary tumor bed excisions (TBEs). Reconstructive outcomes for TBEs remain poorly understood, prompting this study to address the knowledge gap and inform preoperative discussions. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent STS excisions at a quaternary cancer center. Patients were categorized into mass excision (ME) and TBE groups. Reconstructive approaches were divided into simple (primary closure, complex repair, skin grafts, local flaps) and advanced (pedicled or free flaps). The groups were compared for postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death. When simple reconstructive techniques were used, TBEs exhibited higher rates of overall and major complications, whereas MEs had higher rates of overall and minor complications. Intergroup analysis revealed that with simple reconstruction, rates of overall and major complications were higher in TBEs than in MEs, and rates of minor complications were higher in MEs than in TBEs. Regression analyses revealed that simple reconstruction of TBEs had 90% and 180% higher odds of major complications and reoperation compared to simple reconstruction of MEs (P < 0.05). TBEs, despite their smaller size, exhibited a heightened susceptibility to overall and major complications, challenging the notion that simpler techniques suffice in these cases. Our findings encourage the consideration of advanced reconstructive techniques for TBEs that may seem amenable to simple reconstructive techniques.

A Comprehensive Flap Classification: Beyond the Reconstructive Ladder.

Perforator flaps have progressed massively in the last years. The improved vascular imaging techniques and the use of supermicrosurgery have shifted the practice from the traditional predefined angiosomal flaps to the endless variations of custom-made flaps. In this article, we propose a broadened classification of free-style flaps in 3 categories, the angiosomal, including all traditional perforator flaps and their variations, the extra-angiosomal, including flaps that are manufactured to include tissue from a different angiosome, such as turbocharging or supercharging a flap, and neoangiosomal flaps, which are based on the process of neoangiogenesis on autologous or allogenous tissue, such as the venous flow-through flap and integra flap. With this classification, we hope to help unify the classifications and, by doing so, facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and knowledge.MeSH terms: surgical flap / classification, terminology as topic.

Strategic Use of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) in Wound Healing: A Case Series in Asian Patients.

Skin and soft tissue reconstruction has long been based on the reconstructive ladder. However, a skin substitute has become popular due to its predictable outcomes, without donor-site morbidity. The biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM; NovoSorb, PolyNovo Ltd., Port Melbourne, Australia) is a synthetic skin substitute that has recently gained its clinical application. Compared with those of other dermal templates, the clinical efficacy and performance of the BTM are not well established, especially among the Asian population. This study aims to share our experience and strategy of using BTM in various wound conditions. The data of patients who underwent skin and soft tissue reconstruction with BTM at a single institution between January 2022 and December 2023 were reviewed. The patient demographics, wound characteristics, surgical details, secondary procedures, and complications were recorded and analyzed. Postoperative 6-month photographs were collected and independently evaluated by two plastic surgeons and two wound care center nurses using the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). This study included 37 patients, consisting of 22 males and 15 females with a mean age of 51.8 years (range, 18-86 years old). The wound etiologies included trauma (67.6%), necrotizing soft tissue infection (16.2%), burns (10.8%), toe gangrene (2.7%), and scar excision (2.7%). The average wound area covered by BTM was 50.6 ± 47.6 cm2. Among the patients, eight received concomitant flap surgery and BTM implantation, 20 (54.1%) underwent subsequent split-thickness skin grafts (STSG), and 17 had small wounds (mean: 21.6 cm2) healed by secondary intention. Infection was the most common complication, affecting six patients (n = 6 [16.2%]), five of whom were treated conservatively, and only one required debridement. Thirty-three patients (89.2%) had good BTM take, and only four had BTM failure, requiring further reconstruction. At the last follow-up, 35 out of the 37 patients (94.6%) achieved successful wound closure, and the total MSS score was 10.44 ± 2.94, indicating a satisfactory scar condition. The patients who underwent BTM grafting without STSG had better scar scores than those who received STSG (8.71 ± 2.60 vs. 11.18 ± 2.84, p = 0.039). In conclusion, the BTM is effective and feasible in treating various wounds, with relatively low complication rates, and it can thus be considered as an alternative for skin and soft tissue reconstruction. When combined with adipofasical flap reconstruction, it achieves a more comprehensive anatomical restoration.

Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.

Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common and necessary surgery, two factors that drive innovation. This review article examines recent developments in ventral hernia repair including primary fascial closure, mesh selection between biologic, permanent synthetic, and biosynthetic meshes, component separation, and functional abdominal wall reconstruction from a plastic surgery perspective, exploring the full range of hernia repair's own reconstructive ladder. New materials and techniques are examined to explore the ever-increasing options available to surgeons who work within the sphere of ventral hernia repair and provide updates for evolving trends in the field.

When to ditch the ladder and take the elevator: The Anderson SArcoma Risk of Complications (A-SARC) score to guide reconstructive decision-making in extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients.

The reconstructive ladder relies mostly on defect size and depth to determine reconstructive technique, however, in actuality, many more variables ultimately inform reconstructive decision making, especially regarding extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) defects. The purpose of this study was to describe eSTS patients who will most optimally benefit from an advanced method of reconstruction (defined as a pedicled regional flap or free flap) and to create a simple risk assessment scale that can be employed in clinical practice. A single-institution retrospective cohort study examined patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcoma affecting the upper or lower extremities between 2016 and 2021. We categorized patients who required a pedicled or free flap as having had advanced reconstruction, and all other techniques were considered simple reconstruction. A regression was used to create a risk scale to guide reconstructive decision-making. The following variables were identified as independent predictors of complications and used to create our risk scale: lower extremity tumor location, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor bed excision, male sex, hypertension, and tumor volume. Intermediate and high-risk patients reconstructed using simple techniques had significantly greater overall complication rates compared to those reconstructed with advanced techniques. Major complications were significantly greater in low-risk patients reconstructed with advanced techniques. To minimize postoperative wound complications, low-risk patients should receive simple methods of reconstruction, whereas high-risk patients should be reconstructed using advanced techniques.

Tumors around the ankle: a reconstructive challenge

Tumors around the ankle can be either bone or soft tissue sarcomas. The aggressive nature of these tumors and the complex anatomy of the ankle mortice make for a challenging reconstructive ladder. We have explored four different histological tumors which required tailor made resection and reconstruction. All our patients had reasonably good functional outcomes.

Revisiting the reconstructive ladder for soft tissue reconstruction in the lower extremity.

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower limb has seen a paradigm shift over the past two decades. Typically, these defects arise from trauma, infection or tumor. It is no longer enough to simply achieve coverage. Factors like patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic considerations are essential in the decision-making process. This is especially in light of increasing technological advancement, availability of dermal substitutes, microsurgical expertise and development of the field of microsurgical reconstruction as a whole with more novel flaps and techniques. Advancements in reconstructive modalities have also been equally matched by better emergency medical mobilization, transportation and access, early initiation of subspecialty care, accessibility and types of imaging, as well as oncological advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. Yet, this has also meant that our patient profile has expanded to include older patients with more co-morbidities and other considerations such as frailty or the irradiated field which could influence what reconstructive modality is suitable and the goals of reconstruction specific to the patient. Previously deemed unsalvageable limbs are now being successfully reconstructed with good function and aesthesis. In the lower limb, this implicates the ability for early mobilization, range of motion and weight bearing which allow the patient to successfully partake in early rehabilitation. Expedient and reliable healing is also important in the oncological population where a proportion of these patients would need to go on to receive post-operative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The reconstructive ladder has been what many reconstructive surgeons have been taught upon with regard to the basic principles of pre-operative planning and choosing the appropriate reconstructive modality. In this article, we examine the relevance of the reconstructive ladder in modern practice and the additional considerations in the approach to a soft tissue defect in the lower extremity.

Study of Various Modalities of Management of Lower One-third Leg Defects in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background: Lower extremity reconstruction is essential to plastic surgery and focuses on treating wounds and defects secondary to trauma, cancer, or chronic disease processes. Anatomical features of the lower third of the leg like subcutaneous bone surrounded by tendons with no muscles and vessels in isolated compartments with little intercommunication between them make the coverage of the wounds in the region a challenging problem. Aim: to study the various modalities of surgical management of lower 1/3rd leg defects. The study also aims to study the defect size and region in planning various flaps possible in the reconstruction ladder. Methods: The study was conducted from September 2014 to June 2017 on patients admitted to the Department of Burns, Plastic &amp; Reconstructive Surgery and referred patients from the Department of General Surgery &amp; Orthopaedic Surgery, S C B Medical College &amp; Hospital, Cuttack. The Study includes all lower 3rd Leg defect varieties for different surgical treatment modalities. Results: Various reconstructive methods were used to cover the lower 1/3rdleg defects; the maximum was the free muscle transfer in 9 cases. The following typical flap used was the reverse sural flap. Conclusion: The goal in lower limb reconstruction involves needing a stable skeleton, allowing weight-bearing status, with adequate soft tissue coverage to nourish and protect the underlying bone. What one would use for reconstruction depends upon the surgeon’s familiarity and comfort levels with the technique as much as the various circumstances.

Electrophotobiomodulation: A New Step in the Reconstructive Ladder of Post-Traumatic Defects

Electrophotobiomodulation: A New Step in the Reconstructive Ladder of Post-Traumatic Defects

Random pattern sub-clavicular flap in digital degloving injuries: an alternative in the reconstructive ladder

Degloving soft tissue detachment injuries occur when the skin and subcutaneous tissue detach from the underlying structures, affecting the skin coverage. The hand is usually the most frequent affected site. In digital lesions, the best results are obtained by revascularization; nevertheless, this procedure is challenging for the surgeon. Random pattern flaps represent an effective alternative for the treatment of these devastating lesions. We present two clinical cases with digital degloving injury from the proximal phalanx. Both cases required reconstructive surgery in 2 stages, using a successful random pattern sub-clavicular flap. This article aims to share the results of using this method as another reconstructive option with good results. After an average follow-up of 8 months in both cases, adequate skin coverage and functionality of the finger treated with the described flap was observed. Patient A presents a finger with proper healing and functionality. Patient B at 10 months, presents a thumb with adequate length for clamping and opposition. Sub-clavicular flap is an excellent reconstructive alternative for digital degloving injuries where revascularization is unattainable, providing good skin coverage and functionality and being a reproducible outpatient procedure.

The Evolution of Current Concept of the Reconstructive Ladder in Plastic Surgery: The Emerging Role of Translational Medicine.

Plastic surgeons have used the reconstructive ladder for many decades as a standard directory for complex trauma reconstruction with the goal of repairing body structures and restoring functionality. This consists of different surgical maneuvers, such as secondary intention and direct tissue closure, as well as more complex methods such as local tissue transfer and free flap. The reconstructive ladder represents widely known options achievable for tissue reconstruction and wound closure that puts at the bottom rung the simplest methods of reconstruction and strengthens the complexity by moving upward. Regenerative medicine and surgery constitute a quickly spreading area of translational research that can be employed by minimally invasive surgical strategies, with the aim of regenerating cells and tissues in vivo in order to reestablish normal function through the intrinsic potential of cells, in combination with biomaterials and appropriate biochemical stimuli. These translational procedures have the aim of creating an appropriate microenvironment capable of supporting the physiological cellular function to generate the desired cells or tissues and to generate parenchymal, stromal, and vascular components on demand, and above all to produce intelligent materials capable of determining the fate of cells. Smart technologies have been grown that give extra "rungs" on the classic reconstructive ladder to integrate a more holistic, patient-based approach with improved outcomes. This commentary presents the evolution of the traditional concept of the reconstructive ladder in the field of plastic surgery into a new course with the aim of achieving excellent results for soft tissue reconstruction by applying innovative technologies and biologically active molecules for a wide range of surgical diseases.

Necrotizing Fasciitis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Treated with Debridement, Free Flap, and Extra-Articular Reconstruction.

Necrotizing fasciitis of the foot is a relatively rare diagnosis and has traditionally been treated with distal amputation. A 30-year-old diabetic man with Charcot-Marie-Tooth muscular atrophy developed necrotizing fasciitis of the dorsal foot and underwent surgical debridement resulting in a significant wound with exposed tendons. Serial debridements were performed, eventually followed by a staged free flap reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap. After allowing time for flap healing, subsequent staged equinovarus reconstruction was also performed successfully. There were no flap or postoperative complications, and the patient is progressing as expected. Flap refinement procedures have been used to enhance cosmetic and functional outcomes. This report not only showcases the success of a procedure high on the reconstructive ladder in a patient at high risk for complications but also highlights an approach in which functional recovery is also optimized successfully in a planned staged multidisciplinary manner.

The Feasibility and Outcome of Integra® Bilayer Matrix in the Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects.

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and failure rate of Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix (Integra) in the reconstruction of oral cavity defects. Retrospective cohort study. All study information was collected from a single academic tertiary care hospital. Subjects included adult patients who underwent oral cavity resection and immediate subsequent reconstruction with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix at MD Anderson Cancer Center between the years 2015 and 2020. The following variables were collected: patient's demographics, comorbidities, disease stage, treatment and reconstruction modalities, and surgical outcome from the medical records. Statistical analysis included distribution analysis for all collected parameters and Pearson's χ2 tests to find correlation between variables and take rate of Integra. Eighty-three patients underwent reconstruction with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix dressing. Average age was 66 years old. Thirty-nine patients (47%) had history of previous resections for oral cavity tumors. Fourteen patients (17%) had history of radiation therapy to the Head and Neck region. Most common pathology was invasive squamous cell carcinoma (75%) followed by dysplasia (12%). Complete wound healing with good cellular integration occurred in 83 patients (96%) with only 3 failures requiring additional surgery. Reconstruction of mandibulectomy defects was associated with increased risk of dehiscence and bone exposure (0.66, P = .03). This study shows promising results with high take rate of Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix dressing in the reconstruction of various oral cavity defects. We encourage surgeons to adopt this technique as a viable and versatile option into the reconstruction ladder of oral cavity defects.

Treatment of infected soft tissue loss

Hand coverage in infected soft tissue loss (STL) is a challenging clinical condition. Appropriate and well-timed antibiotic therapy and careful debridement are crucial for the success of the subsequent reconstructive procedure. Debridement must be radical, and all nonviable or infected tissue should be removed. Strict medical control and multiple procedures can be required when infection recurrence is observed after primary procedure. Secondary healing of STL is usually necessary in these complex conditions. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is often used as a temporary instrument to reduce oedema and drainage, facilitating the attainment of a clean wound for subsequent reconstruction. According to the type and size of the defect, multiple options ranging from skin grafts and substitutes to local and free flaps can be selected for the treatment of infected STL. A reconstructive ladder approach and case-by-case decision making should always be considered. Due to the unique function and role of the hand, the surgical strategy must also take into account aesthetic and functional factors. Orthopedic and Plastic surgeons should manage this wide variety of treatment options in a multidisciplinary and high-specialized context including radiologists, microbiologists, infectious disease specialists and physiotherapists, customizing the treatment path to the specific patient's situation.