Recommended Infection Control Procedures Research Articles

Microbial Pattern of Neonatal Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital.

The morbidity and mortality rates from neonatal sepsis remain high. However, there is limited information about the microbial pattern of neonatal sepsis in Indonesia. Microbial patterns can give an overview of the hygiene of an environment and act as a determinant for choosing definitive antibiotic treatment in neonatal sepsis patients. The organisms that cause neonatal sepsis differ from unit to unit and from time to time within the same unit. This study is aimed at discovering the microbial pattern of neonatal sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital, in 2021-2022. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study that takes secondary data from the NICU and clinical microbiology department of dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital. Data that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria available between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, were collected. Patients whose blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth and diagnosed with sepsis were selected as the study sample. Out of 174 samples, 93 (53.4%) were found positive for bacterial infection and diagnosed as neonatal sepsis. Gram-negative isolates (96.8%) were predominant. Sixty-point-two percent of Klebsiella pneumoniae XDR, 19.4% of Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL, and 8.6% of Burkholderia cepacia XDR were identified. The gram-positive isolates found in this study were only 3 samples (3.2%). Two-point-one percent of MRSA and 1.1% of Staphylococcus haemolyticus MDR were identified. The most common microorganisms causing neonatal sepsis in our NICU were gram-negative bacteria, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae XDR. Following the recommended infection control procedures, practicing good hand hygiene, and having access to basic supplies and equipment are important to prevent and reduce the incidence of sepsis.

Investigation of Presumptive HIV Transmission Associated with Receipt of Platelet-Rich Plasma Microneedling Facials at a Spa Among Former Spa Clients - New Mexico, 2018-2023.

HIV transmitted through cosmetic injection services via contaminated blood has not been previously documented. During summer 2018, the New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH) was notified of a diagnosis of HIV infection in a woman with no known HIV risk factors who reported exposure to needles from cosmetic platelet-rich plasma microneedling facials (vampire facials) received at a spa in spring 2018. An investigation of the spa's services began in summer 2018, and NMDOH and CDC identified four former spa clients, and one sexual partner of a spa client, all of whom received HIV infection diagnoses during 2018-2023, despite low reported behavioral risks associated with HIV acquisition. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed highly similar HIV strains among all cases. Although transmission of HIV via unsterile injection practices is a known risk, determining novel routes of HIV transmission among persons with no known HIV risk factors is important. This investigation identified an HIV cluster associated with receipt of cosmetic injection services at an unlicensed facility that did not follow recommended infection control procedures or maintain client records. Requiring adequate infection control practices and maintenance of client records at spa facilities offering cosmetic injection services can help prevent the transmission of HIV and other bloodborne pathogens and ensure adequate traceback and notification in the event of adverse clinical outcomes, respectively.

Awareness of Infection Control Protocols Among Dental Students in Babylon Dental Faculty

Infection control and knowledge of common "infectious diseases" is essential for safe dental practice. Conveyance of infectious diseases is likely "from one individual to another during dental procedures", thorough" blood-borne" viruses and bacteria "such as hepatitis" , human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Thence in dental practice, the sterilization and particular protection is of most importance Process in dental procedures, and patient sponsor settings seek specific strategies guide to prevent the transmission of diseases among dental students , oral verdure care staffs and their patients.
 Aim: Current study highlight the methods and behavior to evaluate the benefits of awareness, stance and pursuit of infection control between dental students in training dental clinic at Babylon dental collage .
 Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional wipe using a rear ordered questionnaire was executed. The reconnaissance consisted of 38 closed-ended questions that included the key areas of infection control, including hand hygiene, personal preservation, sterilization and disinfection and ecological infection monitoring. There were also questions to elicit perceptions regarding the treatment of HBV and HIV/AIDS patients.
 Results: Survey study was done for dental students replied to the reconnaissance. Their situation and realization across infection control in college teaching clinic .The results were assorted between 100% were orderly using gloves and 96% mask with patient to 6% were orderly wore eye glasses. The type of sterilization of instrument was 90% autoclave and 10% oven and from analysis of data revealed most teaching clinics devoid of instruction post about control of infection control measures 
 Conclusion: "Improved compliance with recommended infection control procedures is required for all dentists" and graduated dental students predestined in the existing project. Enduring instruction "programs and short-time" processions about "cross-infection and infection control" modes are convenient to progress the awareness and attitude of Dental students in infection control.

Transmission and effect of multiple clusters of seasonal influenza in a Swiss geriatric hospital.

ObjectivesTo investigate a nosocomial outbreak of influenza.DesignProspective outbreak investigation with active case finding and molecular typing.SettingA large academic geriatric hospital in Switzerland.ParticipantsElderly hospitalized adults.MeasurementsBased on syndromic surveillance, a nosocomial influenza outbreak was suspected in February 2012. All suspected cases were screened for respiratory viruses using real‐time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swabs. Infection control procedures (droplet precautions with single room isolation whenever possible) were implemented for all suspected or confirmed cases. Specimens positive for influenza viruses were processed and sequenced whenever possible to track transmission dynamics.ResultsRespiratory samples from 155 suspected cases were analyzed during the outbreak period, of which 69 (44%) were positive for influenza virus, 26 (17%) were positive for other respiratory viruses, and 60 (39%) were negative. Three other cases fulfilled clinical criteria for influenza infection but were not sampled, and one individual was admitted with an already positive test, resulting in a total of 73 influenza cases, of which 62 (85%) were classified as nosocomial. Five distinct clusters of nosocomial transmission were identified using viral sequencing, with epidemiologically unexpected in‐hospital transmission dynamics. Seven of 23 patients who experienced influenza complications died. Sixteen healthcare workers experienced an influenza‐like illness (overall vaccination rate, 36%).ConclusionNosocomial influenza transmission caused more secondary cases than repeated community importation during this polyclonal outbreak. Molecular tools revealed complex transmission dynamics. Low healthcare worker vaccination rates and gaps in recommended infection control procedures are likely to have contributed to nosocomial spread of influenza, which remains a potentially life‐threatening disease in elderly adults.

A review on guidelines for hand hygiene in dental practice

Wash and care. These two words would probably best summarize the main aspect of hand hygiene in clinical dental practice. Not only are hands the most significant means of germ transmission, they are also the most important dental practice tools. Following the adoption of hand disinfection practice, using chlorinated lime solutions in 1861 by Semmelweis Ignaz, the incidence of hospital acquired diseases has drastically reduced. These primitive guidelines have hence been updated and are constantly reviewed in the light of available newer information. Current evidence indicates that, if recommended infection control procedures are followed, the risks of transmission of infectious diseases during dental treatment is drastically reduced. The implementation of an infection control policy and standard operating procedures requires a thorough knowledge of the risks and the practical measures to be taken using best practice guidelines and recommendations. This article reviews practical measures needed to ensure effective hand hygiene in the dental practice.

Prävention der nosokomialen Übertragung von humanem Immunschwächevirus (HIV) durch HIV-positive Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter im Gesundheitswesen

To the best of our knowledge, the German Association for the Control of Viral Diseases (DVV) e.V. and the Society for Virology (GfV) e.V. are the first in Europe to provide precise recommendations for the management of health care workers (HCWs) who are infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Requirements for HIV-infected HCWs need to be clearly defined. With a permanent viral burden of less than or equal to 50 copies/mL, HIV-positive HCWs are allowed to perform any surgery and any invasive procedure, as long as the infected HCW uses double-gloving, undergoes follow-up routinely by occupational medicine professionals, undergoes a quarterly examination of viral burden, and has a regular medical examination by a physician who has expertise in the management of HIV. Unrestricted professional activity is only possible with a strict compliance to take antiretroviral therapy and if the HIV-infected HCW strictly adheres to the recommended infection control procedures. Complete compliance with the recommendation almost certainly leads to no HIV transmission risk in patient care.

A survey of cross-infection control procedures: knowledge and attitudes of Turkish dentists

Objectives:The objective of this study was to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and behavior of Turkish dentists in Samsun City regarding cross-infection control.Material and methods:A questionnaire was designed to obtain information about procedures used for the prevention of cross-infection in dental practices and determine the attitudes and perceptions of respondent dental practitioners to their procedures. The study population included all dentists in the city of Samsun, Turkey, in April 2005 (n=184). The questionnaire collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and practice of infection control procedures, sterilization, wearing of gloves, mask, use of rubber dam, method of storing instruments and disposal methods of contaminated material, etc. Questionnaire data was entered into a computer and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.Results:From the 184 dentists to whom the questionnaires were submitted, 135 participated in the study (overall response rate of 73.36%). As much as 74.10% dentists expressed concern about the risk of cross-infection from patients to themselves and their dental assistants. Forty-three percent of the participants were able to define "cross-infection" correctly. The greatest majority of the respondents (95.60%) stated that all patients have to be considered as infectious and universal precautions must apply to all of them. The overall responses to the questionnaire showed that the dentists had moderate knowledge of infection control procedures.Conclusions:Improved compliance with recommended infection control procedures is required for all dentists evaluated in the present survey. Continuing education programs and short-time courses about cross-infection and infection control procedures are suitable to improve the knowledge of dentists.

Infection control knowledge and practices related to HIV among Nigerian dentists

Many diseases including HIV/AIDS can be transmitted in the dental setting when effective infection control procedures are ignored. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the infection control knowledge and practices of Nigerian dentists in the era of HIV/AIDS. Information on knowledge of transmission of HIV, occupational vulnerability, infection control practices, and opinion on adequacy of infection control facilities were gathered from dentists through a self-administered questionnaire. Knowledge was assessed on a total score of 20 questions. Only 3.6% of the dentists had poor knowledge. Younger males and dentists working in teaching hospitals had significantly better knowledge than their counterparts. While 40.8% believed HIV could be transmitted through saliva, only 43.2% knew it could be transmitted through the conjunctiva. Most (93.2%) wore gloves routinely and the most common barrier to glove use was non-availability. Most (79.2%) used autoclaves for sterilization; however, chemical disinfectants and boiling were also used. The majority (72.4%) believed the facilities for infection control in their centres were inadequate. Close to half of the respondents (47.6%; n = 118) rated the occupational risk of becoming infected with HIV as high. The results of this study have shown that while the level of knowledge of the dentists was generally acceptable, there were still some misconceptions on the transmission and occupational vulnerability of HIV. It also indicates only partial compliance with recommended infection control procedures among Nigerian dentists as a result of inadequate supplies.

Leptospirosis in a Small Animal Veterinarian: Reminder to Follow Standardized Infection Control Procedures

A small animal veterinarian in Washington State developed leptospirosis after an occupational exposure. Approximately 10 days prior to the onset of illness, he examined a healthy appearing pet rat for fleas, which urinated on his un-gloved hands. Although the veterinarian washed his hands after the examination, his hands had abrasions from gardening. The veterinarian was hospitalized for 12 days and was able to return to work part-time 1 month following discharge. This illness may have been prevented if the veterinarian had been wearing gloves during the examination as recommended by the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV), Veterinary Infection Control Committee, in its Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions for Zoonotic Disease Prevention in Veterinary Personnel (2008). This case alerts us to the need for small animal veterinarians to minimize their infection risk by practising recommended infection control procedures. Veterinarians should establish and follow a written infection control plan based on the standardized infection control approach adopted by the NASPHV to minimize their risk of occupational zoonotic infections.

Infection control attitudes and perceptions among dental students in Latin America: implications for dental education

Latin American dental schools are at diverse stages in the continuum of implementation of infection control (IC) programmes that comply with evidence-based recommendations. Poor IC training may result in low compliance and negative attitudes against patients infected with blood borne pathogens (BBP). To evaluate students' knowledge on IC and attitudes toward occupational BBP risks, in six dental schools in Latin America. This survey was administered to convenience samples of dental students at one school in Costa Rica; four schools in Mexico, and one in Venezuela. The questionnaire included Likert-type scale evaluations of agreement with statements. Study variables included knowledge about and confidence in recommended IC procedures, degree of concern about HIV and HBV transmission in dental settings, and attitudes toward patients infected with BBP. Possible associations between variables were analysed using Pearson's Chi square and Kruskal Wallis tests. Substantial numbers of students had incomplete knowledge and often lacked confidence on IC and procedures; believed that HIV and HBV could be transmitted during clinical procedures; felt worried about occupational exposure to BBP, and held prejudices towards HIV and HBV infected individuals. Educational efforts are needed to enhance IC teaching and compliance. Diverse educational resources and international networks for research collaboration are available from organisations specialised in IC, hopefully paving the way to harmonising regional standards.

Are therapeutic ultrasound units a potential vector for nosocomial infection?

Nosocomial infections present a widespread problem in today's healthcare environment, with a significant number of patients acquiring an infection annually. With the contemporary transition of immunocompromised and high-risk patients to community-based care, therapeutic ultrasound has the potential to be a vector of infection in the physiotherapy setting. The purpose of the present study was to determine the degree of contamination on therapeutic ultrasound transducer heads and ultrasound gel after routine clinical use, and to evaluate the efficacy of recommended infection control procedures. The study consisted of two phases. Using a prospective cross-sectional design, microbiological cultures were obtained from 44 transducer heads and 43 gels. Subjects were drawn from a variety of physiotherapy practice settings. All samples containing more than five colony forming units per cm2 were considered contaminated. Following these measurements, a repeated-measures design was used to re-evaluate the 44 transducer heads for the amount and type of bacteria present after cleaning with a 70% alcohol wipe. Twenty-seven per cent of transducer heads and 28% of gels were contaminated. Transducer heads showed fairly low levels of contamination across the sample, with the majority of organisms isolated found in normal skin and environmental flora. Gels were heavily contaminated with opportunistic and potentially pathogenic organisms, including Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. No multi-resistant organisms were identified. Cleaning with 70% alcohol significantly reduced the level of contamination on transducer heads (p < 0.01). Therapeutic ultrasound equipment is a potential vector for nosocomial infection in physiotherapy patients. The risk of infection from transducer heads can be effectively removed by cleaning with 70% alcohol between patients. Further research into possible strategies to reduce the risk of infection from ultrasound gels is needed.

Compliance with recommended infection control procedures among Canadian dentists: Results of a national survey

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate compliance with recommended infection control (IC) practices by dentists in Canada in 1995. Design: A mailed survey of a stratified random sample of dentists (N = 6444), with 3 follow-up attempts. Weighted analyses included multiple logistic regression to identify the best predictors of “excellent” compliance (18 items). Results: The adjusted response rate was 66.4%. Respondents reported use of an IC manual (52%); postexposure protocol (41%); biologic monitoring of heat-sterilizers (71%); hepatitis B immunization of dentists (91%: of these 72% had post-immunization screening; natural immunity 3%) all hygienists (78%), and all other clinical staff (70%); handwashing (before treating patients 76%, after degloving 63%); always wearing gloves (95%); changing gloves after each patient (97%); masks (82%); protective eyewear (82%); protective uniform (48%); puncture-proof container for sharps (94%); recapping needles with scoop technique/device (60%); flushing waterlines (55%); heat-sterilizing handpieces (94%; after each patient 77%); high-volume suction (92%) and “excellent” compliance (6%). Significant predictors of “excellent compliance” included attending continuing education about IC (≥10 hours, odds ratio [OR] = 6.3; 6-10 hours, OR = 3.3), treating 20 to 29 patients per day (OR = 2.8), being women (OR = 2.7), and population of city in which practice is located (>500,000, OR = 2.5). Conclusion: Improvements in IC are necessary in dental practice. The introduction of mandatory continuing education about IC may improve compliance with recommended IC procedures, which is important because of concerns related to transmission of bloodborne pathogens and drug-resistant microorganisms. (AJIC Am J Infect Control 1999;27:377-84)

The role of age‐ and population‐ based differences in the attitudes, knowledge and infection control practices of Canadian dentists

Abstract– Objectives: To investigate age‐ and population‐based differences in dentists' infection control practices and willingness and refusal to treat patients with HIV. Methods: A national mailed survey of a stratied random sample of dentists in Canada (n= 6444) with three follow‐up attempts. Pearsons's chi‐square test and multiple logistic regression were used for data analysis. Predictor variables included population, age, gender, marital status, specialty, number of patients treated per day and continuing education on HIV/AIDS. Results: The adjusted response rate was 66.4%. The best predictors of willingness to treat patients with HIV were younger age (compared with dentists≧60 years of age:&lt; 30 years, OR = 8.6, 30–39, OR = 3.4; 40–49, OR = 2.7; 50–59, OR = 1.6), attending continuing education on HIV/AIDS in the past 2 years (&gt; 10 hours, OR = 1.6 compared with zero hours), practicing in small population centres &lt; 10 000 (OR = 1.6 compared with &gt; 500 000) and gender (male OR = 1.3). The best predictors of refusal to treat patients with HIV were older age (compared with dentists &lt; 30 years of age: ≧60, OR = 6.1; 50–59, OR = 4.1; 40–49, OR = 3.0; 30–39, OR = 2.6); and practicing in population centres &gt; 500 000 (OR = 1.5 compared with &lt; 10 000). However, the latter group also reported treating more HIV patients than respondents in smaller communities. Infection control practices varied significantly with age and population centre. Dentists in communities of &lt; 10 000 were more compliant with HBV vaccination, but less compliant with handwashing after degloving and the use of infection control manuals. Similarly, dentists &gt; 60 years of age were the least compliant with HBV immunization, routine use of barriers and sterilization of handpieces, but reported the highest compliance with handwashing. Conclusion: Age‐ and population‐based differences need to be considered in planning educational interventions to improve both access to care for patients with HIV and dentists' compliance with recommended infection control procedures.

The role of age- and population-based differences in the attitudes, knowledge and infection control practices of Canadian dentists.

To investigate age- and population-based differences in dentists' infection control practices and willingness and refusal to treat patients with HIV. A national mailed survey of a stratified random sample of dentists in Canada (n = 6444) with three follow-up attempts. Pearson's chi-square test and multiple logistic regression were used for data analysis. Predictor variables included population, age, gender, marital status, specialty, number of patients treated per day and continuing education on HIV/AIDS. The adjusted response rate was 66.4%. The best predictors of willingness to treat patients with HIV were younger age (compared with dentists > or = 60 years of age: < 30 years, OR = 8.6, 30-39, OR = 3.4; 40-49, OR = 2.7; 50-59, OR = 1.6), attending continuing education on HIV/AIDS in the past 2 years (> 10 hours, OR = 1.6 compared with zero hours), practicing in small population centres < 10,000 (OR = 1.6 compared with > 500,000) and gender (male OR = 1.3). The best predictors of refusal to treat patients with HIV were older age (compared with dentists < 30 years of age: > or = 60, OR = 6.1; 50-59, OR = 4.1; 40-49, OR = 3.0; 30-39, OR = 2.6); and practicing in population centres > 500,000 (OR = 1.5 compared with < 10,000). However, the latter group also reported treating more HIV patients than respondents in smaller communities. Infection control practices varied significantly with age and population centre. Dentists in communities of < 10,000 were more compliant with HBV vaccination, but less compliant with handwashing after degloving and the use of infection control manuals. Similarly, dentists > 60 years of age were the least compliant with HBV immunization, routine use of barriers and sterilization of handpieces, but reported the highest compliance with handwashing. Age- and population-based differences need to be considered in planning educational interventions to improve both access to care for patients with HIV and dentists' compliance with recommended infection control procedures.

An assessment of cross-infection control procedures among English-speaking Caribbean general dental practitioners. A regional preliminary study

A survey was undertaken to assess the level of compliance with recommended infection control procedures among English-speaking Caribbean general dental practitioners. A four page questionnaire was sent to all practitioners in 18 English-speaking Caribbean islands. A response rate of 32 per cent was obtained. A large proportion of dentists followed the recommended barrier techniques particularly the use of gloves and facemasks. The most commonly available methods of sterilisation were steam autoclaves (82 per cent) and cold solutions (94 per cent). Seventy four per cent of respondents had received hepatitis B vaccination. A high percentage of dentists showed willingness to treat HBV (95 per cent) and HIV (84 per cent) carriers and this level of willingness to treat infectious patients has rarely been reported previously. There is an urgent need for further improvements to avoid getting inoculation injuries and splatters in the face or eyes with body fluids. Disposal of sharps and collection of solid waste are to be upgraded. The Caribbean Atlantic Regional Dental Association is planning to carry out similar research before the end of the year 2000.

A comparison of infection control practices of different groups of oral specialists and general dental practitioners

Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the infection control practices of general dentists and dental specialty groups. Methods. A survey was mailed to 5997 dentists in 1994; the response rate was 70%. The data were analyzed with multiple logistic regression (reference group: general dentists). Results. When sociodemographic influences were taken into consideration, significant predictors of routine infection control practices included all of the following characteristics (odds ratios are in parentheses): 1. 1. Glove: being younger than 40 years of age (4.5) and being female (5.9). 2. 2. Using gloves and changing gloves after each patient: being younger than 40 years of age (4.0), being female (3.0), being an oral surgeon (3.6), and being an orthodontist (0.2). 3. 3. Using gloves, masks, and protective eyewear: being younger than 40 years of age (2.5), being female (2.3), and being an orthodontist, oral physician, or oral pathologist (0.2). 4. 4. Hepatitis B vaccination for the practitioner: being younger than 40 years of age (5.1). 5. 5. Hepatitis B vaccination for all clinical staff members: being younger than 40 years of age (1.2), being an oral surgeon (1.7), and being an orthodontist (0.6). 6. 6. Heat sterilization of handpieces: being younger than 40 years of age (1.5), being an oral surgeon (5.4), and being an orthodontist (0.2). 7. 7. Taking no additional precautions for patients with HIV: being younger than 40 years of age (1.7), being a periodontist (2.6), being a pedodontist (2.3), and being an oral physician/oral pathologist (4.3). Conclusion. Improved compliance with recommended infection control procedures is required for all groups and is particularly necessary for orthodontists.

The infection control practices of general dental practitioners.

To investigate the infection control practices of general dentists in Ontario in 1994. Confidential coded questionnaires were mailed to all general dental practitioners in Ontario (n = 5,176), with three follow-up attempts. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test and multiple logistic regression. Offices of general dental practitioners in Ontario. General dental practitioners actively involved in treating patients. The response rate adjusted for nondelivery was 70%. A high proportion of respondents reported using gloves (always, 91.8%; sometimes, 7.8%), masks (always, 74.8%; sometimes, 21.1%), or protective eyewear (always, 83.6%; sometimes, 13%); heat sterilization of handpieces (83.9%); and hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination of dentists (92.3%). However, only 61.4% of respondents reported HBV vaccination of all clinical staff, and 87.7% used additional precautions for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Significant predictors of the use of recommended infection control procedures (i.e., always using gloves, masks, and eye protection; heat sterilization of handpieces; HBV vaccination for dentist and staff; and no extra precautions for patients with HIV) were age < 40 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.6), lack of concern regarding increased personal risk (OR, 2.0) or costs of infection control procedures (OR, 1.5), and knowledge of the low infectivity of HIV after a needlestick injury (OR, 2.0) and that infection control procedures for HBV are adequate for HIV (OR, 2.7). Additional education is required to promote a more realistic perception of risk of HIV transmission in the dental office and the use of all recommended infection control practices, including Universal Precautions.

Infection control in the orthodontic office in Canada

Because of the difficulty of identifying infected persons, current recommendations for infection control are to treat all patients as if they are infected with blood-borne pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the hepatitis viruses. Dentists' compliance with these recommendations has been investigated previously, however, there are few data related to orthodontists. The objective of this study was to measure the proportion of orthodontists who report the use of recommended infection control procedures and to compare the infection control practices of orthodontists and general dentists. A mailed survey with three follow-up attempts was administered to all orthodontists and general dentists in Ontario (N = 5441) in 1994. There were significant differences in the routine use of gloves (orthodontists 85%, general dentists 92%); masks (orthodontists 38%, general dentists 75%); protective eyewear (orthodontists 60%, general dentists 84%); changing gloves after each patient (orthodontists 84%, general dentists 96%); and heat sterilization of handpieces (orthodontists 57%, general dentists 84%). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination of all clinical staff was reported by 46% of orthodontists, compared with 61% of general dentists (p < 0.001). Reports of HBV vaccination of orthodontists (94%) and general dentists (92%) were not significantly different. The use of additional precautions for patients with HIV was reported by 80% of orthodontists and 78% of general dentists. More education is required to promote the use of universal precautions by both general practitioners and orthodontists. Increased use of barrier methods, HBV vaccination of clinical staff, and heat sterilization of handpieces is required to reduce the potential for cross infection in the orthodontic practice. This is particularly important with the increasing number of microorganisms that are resistant to antibiotics. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;112:275-81.)

Can HIV be transmitted from dental personnel to patients by dentistry?

Over 19,000 patients treated by 57 HIV-infected health care workers (HCWs) have been tested for HIV. Apart from the notorious Florida dental case, no patient has been shown to be infected by treatment given by an HIV-infected HCW. Cases of 10 HIV-infected HCWs have been examined in some depth. The evidence indicates that HIV transmission from HCWs to patient is exceedingly improbable, and almost impossible where recommended infection control procedures are adhered to.

Cleaning, Sterilization and Disinfection: Basics of Microbial Killing for Infection Control

Cleaning items directly involved in patient care makes the disinfection or sterilization process easier. Specific steps in cleaning instruments and equipment and dental unit surfaces are described. Recommended infection control procedures are listed, together with monitoring methods.