Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Research Articles

Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Updated Guidance on Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy.

Seasonal influenza infection can lead to serious complications and adverse outcomes for pregnant individuals, the developing fetus and infants younger than six months of age. This supplemental statement provides an evidence summary on the safety and effectiveness of influenza vaccination in pregnant individuals, and the benefits and risks to the pregnant person, the developing fetus and infants younger than six months of age. A systematic review was conducted on the effectiveness and safety of influenza vaccination in pregnancy. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)'s evidence-based process was used to assess the quality of eligible studies, summarize and analyze the findings, and apply an ethics, equity, feasibility and acceptability lens to develop recommendations. The evidence suggests that influenza vaccination during pregnancy is effective in reducing the risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection and hospitalization in both pregnant individuals and their infants up to six months postpartum. The evidence also suggests that influenza vaccination during pregnancy does not increase the risk of non-obstetric serious adverse events in pregnant persons, infant death, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight and congenital anomalies. Based on this body of evidence, NACI reaffirms the safety and importance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. NACI recommends that individuals at any stage of pregnancy should receive an age-appropriate inactivated, unadjuvanted or recombinant influenza vaccine each influenza season. Influenza vaccination may be given at the same time as, or at any time before or after administration of another vaccine, including the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or pertussis vaccines.

Trivalent and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in adults aged 60 and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of influenza vaccines of any valency for adults 60 years and older.Design and settingSystematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, EMBASE,...

Immunogenicity of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines Against Mismatched Influenza Strains in Older Adults: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Antigenic drift is a major driver of viral evolution and a primary reason why influenza vaccines must be reformulated annually. Mismatch between vaccine and circulating viral strains negatively affects vaccine effectiveness and often contributes to higher rates of influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths, particularly in years dominated by A(H3N2). Several countries recommend enhanced influenza vaccines for older adults, who are at the highest risk of severe influenza complications and mortality. The immunogenicity of enhanced vaccines against heterologous A(H3N2) strains has been examined in nine studies to date. In six studies, an enhanced, licensed MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV3) consistently increased heterologous antibody titers relative to standard influenza vaccine, with evidence of a broad heterologous immune response across multiple genetic clades. In one study, licensed high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV3) also induced higher heterologous antibody titers than standard influenza vaccine. In a study comparing a higher dose licensed quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) with HD-IIV3 and aIIV3, no significant differences in antibody titers against a heterologous strain were observed, although seroconversion rates were higher with RIV4 versus comparators. With the unmet medical need for improved influenza vaccines, the paucity of studies especially with enhanced vaccines covering mismatched strains highlights a need for further investigation of cross-protection in older adults.

재조합 인플루엔자 백신과 불활성화 인플루엔자 백신의 면역원성 비교

To compare surrogate markers of immunogenicity between recombinant and inactivated influenza vaccines, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for each strain. Three databases of Medline (Pubmed), Embase and Cochrane Central were searched to identify all published literature up to July 2023. Out of a total of 1,658 initially identified articles, 14 randomized controlled trials were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The program R version 4.3.1 was used to estimate the mean difference of geometric mean titer (GMT) and the pooled risk ratio (RR) of seroconversion and seroprotection with 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis results found higher GMT effect sizes for recombinant influenza vaccines compared to inactivated vaccines for A/H3N2 (MD=124.87, 95% CI 52.63-197.11) and B/Yamagata (MD=19.89, 95% CI 7.61-32.17) strains. In terms of seroconversion rates, recombinant influenza vaccines exhibited higher seroconversion for A/H3N2 (RR=1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.40) and B/Yamagata (RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.06-2.89) strains. Slightly higher seroprotection rates were observed for A/H3N2 (RR=1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07) and B/Yamagata (RR=1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13) strains with recombinant vaccines. The findings from this study contribute valuable evidence for regulatory decisions when introducing recombinant vaccines in South Korea.

Adjuvanted nanoliposomes displaying six hemagglutinins and neuraminidases as an influenza virus vaccine

Inclusion of defined quantities of the two major surface proteins of influenza virus, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), could benefit seasonal influenza vaccines. Recombinant HA and NA multimeric proteins derived from three influenza serotypes, H1N1, H3N2, and type B, are surface displayed on nanoliposomes co-loaded with immunostimulatory adjuvants, generating "hexaplex" particles that are used to immunize mice. Protective immune responses to hexaplex liposomes involve functional antibody elicitation against each included antigen, comparable to vaccination with monovalent antigen particles. When compared to contemporary recombinant or adjuvanted influenza virus vaccines, hexaplex liposomes perform favorably in many areas, including antibody production, Tcell activation, protection from lethal virus challenge, and protection following passive sera transfer. Based on these results, hexaplex liposomes warrant further investigation as an adjuvanted recombinant influenza vaccine formulation.

Influenza in Pregnancy: Prevention and Treatment: ACOG Committee Statement No. 7.

Pregnant and postpartum individuals are at significantly higher risk of serious complications related to seasonal and pandemic influenza infections compared with nonpregnant people. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that all adults receive an annual influenza vaccine and that individuals who are or will be pregnant during influenza season receive an inactivated or recombinant influenza vaccine as soon as it is available. Although the influenza vaccine significantly lowers the risk of severe disease, it will not prevent all infections. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric health care professionals should consider both influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection for pregnant individuals who present with symptoms of respiratory illness. Antiviral treatment should not be delayed while awaiting respiratory infection test results, and a patient's vaccination status should not affect the decision to treat. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care professionals can help reduce disparities in influenza vaccination rates as well as severe outcomes related to influenza infection by strongly recommending influenza vaccination to all patients.

Redirecting antibody responses from egg-adapted epitopes following repeat vaccination with recombinant or cell culture-based versus egg-based influenza vaccines

Repeat vaccination with egg-based influenza vaccines could preferentially boost antibodies targeting the egg-adapted epitopes and reduce immunogenicity to circulating viruses. In this randomized trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03722589), sera pre- and post-vaccination with quadrivalent inactivated egg-based (IIV4), cell culture-based (ccIIV4), and recombinant (RIV4) influenza vaccines were collected from healthcare personnel (18-64 years) in 2018−19 (N = 723) and 2019−20 (N = 684) influenza seasons. We performed an exploratory analysis. Vaccine egg-adapted changes had the most impact on A(H3N2) immunogenicity. In year 1, RIV4 induced higher neutralizing and total HA head binding antibodies to cell- A(H3N2) virus than ccIIV4 and IIV4. In year 2, among the 7 repeat vaccination arms (IIV4-IIV4, IIV4-ccIIV4, IIV4-RIV4, RIV4-ccIIV4, RIV4-RIV4, ccIIV4-ccIIV4 and ccIIV4-RIV4), repeat vaccination with either RIV4 or ccIIV4 further improved antibody responses to circulating viruses with decreased neutralizing antibody egg/cell ratio. RIV4 also had higher post-vaccination A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) HA stalk antibodies in year 1, but there was no significant difference in HA stalk antibody fold rise among vaccine groups in either year 1 or year 2. Multiple seasons of non-egg-based vaccination may be needed to redirect antibody responses from immune memory to egg-adapted epitopes and re-focus the immune responses towards epitopes on the circulating viruses to improve vaccine effectiveness.

Recombinant or Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Adults under 65 Years of Age

BackgroundQuadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccines contain three times the amount of hemagglutinin protein as standard-dose egg-based vaccines, and the recombinant formulation is not susceptible to antigenic drift during manufacturing. Data are needed on the relative effectiveness of recombinant vaccines as compared with standard-dose vaccines against influenza-related outcomes in adults under the age of 65 years.MethodsIn this cluster-randomized observational study, Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities routinely administered either a high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine (Flublok Quadrivalent) or one of two standard-dose influenza vaccines during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 influenza seasons to adults 50 to 64 years of age (primary age group) and 18 to 49 years of age. Each facility alternated weekly between the two vaccine formulations. The primary outcome was influenza (A or B) confirmed by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) testing. Secondary outcomes included influenza A, influenza B, and influenza-related hospitalization outcomes. We used Cox regression analysis to estimate the hazard ratio of the recombinant vaccine as compared with the standard-dose vaccines against each outcome. We calculated the relative vaccine effectiveness as 1 minus the hazard ratio.ResultsThe study population included 1,630,328 vaccinees between the ages of 18 and 64 years (632,962 in the recombinant-vaccine group and 997,366 in the standard-dose group). During this study period, 1386 cases of PCR-confirmed influenza were diagnosed in the recombinant-vaccine group and 2435 cases in the standard-dose group. Among the participants who were 50 to 64 years of age, 559 participants (2.00 cases per 1000) tested positive for influenza in the recombinant-vaccine group as compared with 925 participants (2.34 cases per 1000) in the standard-dose group (relative vaccine effectiveness, 15.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 to 23.8; P=0.002). In the same age group, the relative vaccine effectiveness against influenza A was 15.7% (95% CI, 6.0 to 24.5; P=0.002). The recombinant vaccine was not significantly more protective against influenza-related hospitalization than were the standard-dose vaccines.ConclusionsThe high-dose recombinant vaccine conferred more protection against PCR-confirmed influenza than an egg-based standard-dose vaccine among adults between the ages of 50 and 64 years. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03694392.)

Nucleoprotein as a Promising Antigen for Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccines.

Annual vaccination is considered as the main preventive strategy against seasonal influenza. Due to the highly variable nature of major viral antigens, such as hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), influenza vaccine strains should be regularly updated to antigenically match the circulating viruses. The influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) is much more conserved than HA and NA, and thus seems to be a promising target for the design of improved influenza vaccines with broad cross-reactivity against antigenically diverse influenza viruses. Traditional subunit or recombinant protein influenza vaccines do not contain the NP antigen, whereas live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) express the viral NP within infected cells, thus inducing strong NP-specific antibodies and T-cell responses. Many strategies have been explored to design broadly protective NP-based vaccines, mostly targeted at the T-cell mode of immunity. Although the NP is highly conserved, it still undergoes slow evolutionary changes due to selective immune pressure, meaning that the particular NP antigen selected for vaccine design may have a significant impact on the overall immunogenicity and efficacy of the vaccine candidate. In this review, we summarize existing data on the conservation of the influenza A viral nucleoprotein and review the results of preclinical and clinical trials of NP-targeting influenza vaccine prototypes, focusing on the ability of NP-specific immune responses to protect against diverse influenza viruses.

Vaccine effectiveness of recombinant and standard dose influenza vaccines against influenza related hospitalization using a retrospective test-negative design

BackgroundRelative effectiveness of various vaccine formulations provide important input for vaccine policy decisions and provider purchasing decisions. We used electronic databases to conduct a test-negative case control study to determine relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) compared with standard dose vaccines (SD-IIV4) against influenza hospitalization. MethodsAdults 18–64 and ≥65 years of age hospitalized in a large U.S. health system (19 hospitals) in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 who were clinically tested for influenza using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were included. The hospital system electronic medical record (EMR) and the state immunization registry were used to confirm influenza vaccination. Propensity scores with inverse probability weighting were used to adjust for potential confounders and determine rVE. ResultsOf the 14,590 individuals included in the primary analysis, 3,338 were vaccinated with RIV4 and 976 were vaccinated with SD-IIV4, with the balance of 10,276 being unvaccinated. Most participants were white (80 %), most (70 %) had a high-risk condition, just over half were female (54 %) and age 65 years or older (53 %). Overall RIV4 rVE was significant when adjusted for propensity scores with inverse probability weights (rVE = 31; 95 % CI = 11 %, 46 %). Among younger adults (18–64 years-old), overall rVE of RIV4 was significant (rVE = 29; 95 % CI = 4 %, 47 %). ConclusionsOver all adults, both RIV4 and SD-IIV4 were effective against influenza hospitalization, with RIV4 providing better protection compared with SD-IIV4 overall, for females, younger adults, and those with no high-risk conditions.

Construction of an inhalable recombinant M2e-FP-expressing Bacillus subtilis spores-based vaccine and evaluation of its protection efficacy against influenza in a mouse model

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a deadly zoonotic pathogen that remains a burden to global health systems despite continuous vaccinations, indicating the need for an improved vaccine strategy. In this work, we constructed a new recombinant influenza vaccine using Bacillus subtilis spores expressing M2e-FP protein (RSM2eFP) and assessed its potency and efficacy in BALB/c mouse immunized via aerosolized intratracheal inoculation (i.t.) or intragastric (i.g.) administration. Immunization via i.t. route conferred 100 % protection against 20 × LD50 A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) virus compared with only 50 % via the i.g. route. Even when challenged with 40 × LD50 virus, the RSM2eFP vaccine immunized via i.t. provided 80 % protection. Consistently, i.t. inoculation of RSM2eFP spore vaccine induced a stronger lung mucosal immune response and a greater cellular immune response than i.g. administration, as indicated by the high production of IgG and SIgA. In addition, the RSM2eFP spore vaccine diminished the yield of infectious virus in the lung of mice immunized via i.t. These results suggest that i.t. immunization of the RSM2eFP spore vaccine may be a promising strategy for the development of mucosal vaccines against IAV infections.

Immunogenicity of High-Dose Egg-Based, Recombinant, and Cell Culture-Based Influenza Vaccines Compared With Standard-Dose Egg-Based Influenza Vaccine Among Health Care Personnel Aged 18-65 Years in 2019-2020.

Emerging data suggest that second-generation influenza vaccines with higher hemagglutinin (HA) antigen content and/or different production methods may induce stronger antibody responses to HA than standard-dose egg-based influenza vaccines in adults. We compared antibody responses to high-dose egg-based inactivated (HD-IIV3), recombinant (RIV4), and cell culture-based (ccIIV4) vs standard-dose egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV4) among health care personnel (HCP) aged 18-65 years in 2 influenza seasons (2018-2019, 2019-2020). In the second trial season, newly and re-enrolled HCPs who received SD-IIV4 in season 1 were randomized to receive RIV4, ccIIV4, or SD-IIV4 or were enrolled in an off-label, nonrandomized arm to receive HD-IIV3. Prevaccination and 1-month-postvaccination sera were tested by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay against 4 cell culture propagated vaccine reference viruses. Primary outcomes, adjusted for study site and baseline HI titer, were seroconversion rate (SCR), geometric mean titers (GMTs), mean fold rise (MFR), and GMT ratios that compared vaccine groups to SD-IIV4. Among 390 HCP in the per-protocol population, 79 received HD-IIV3, 103 RIV4, 106 ccIIV4, and 102 SD-IIV4. HD-IIV3 recipients had similar postvaccination antibody titers compared with SD-IIV4 recipients, whereas RIV4 recipients had significantly higher 1-month-postvaccination antibody titers against vaccine reference viruses for all outcomes. HD-IIV3 did not induce higher antibody responses than SD-IIV4, but, consistent with previous studies, RIV4 was associated with higher postvaccination antibody titers. These findings suggest that recombinant vaccines rather than vaccines with higher egg-based antigen doses may provide improved antibody responses in highly vaccinated populations.

Efficacy of Hemagglutinin Gene of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza as a Vaccine Candidate in Poultry: A Review

The most prevalent fatal disease in poultry that can result in high morbidity and mortality is highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), subtype H5N1. A vaccination program is the most frequent way to prevent HPAI cases in poultry, especially against the H5 subtype of HPAI. There are currently a number of avian influenza vaccines available, including recombinant and inactivated whole virus vaccines. The foundation of a recombinant vaccine is possible by the expression of an avian influenza gene of interest following insertion into a carrier vector (no pathogenic virus). A recombinant HPAI vaccine is required to further challenge avian influenza cases in poultry. As a recombinant vaccine inserted into a carrier vector, the hemagglutinin (HA) gene has proven effective. The recombinant Herpes Virus Turkey (rHVT) vector vaccine for avian influenza has been discovered and is commercially available. The rHVT vaccine was developed using a hemagglutinin insert from the HPAI virus clade 2.2. Overall, studies in this review aimed to determine the efficacy of any developed recombinant avian influenza vaccine that uses the HA gene from different clades challenged with any avian influenza virus (AIV) isolate. It was found that the efficacy of hemagglutinin as a recombinant vaccine could be promising for future HPAI vaccine development. In addition, it is possible to design a recombinant vaccine using local isolates to protect poultry farms, particularly in endemic regions.

AF03 adjuvant improves anti-hemagglutinin and anti-neuraminidase immune responses induced by licensed seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccines in mice.

Seasonal influenza remains a serious public health concern as the viral infection spreads easily from person to person and due to antigenic drift of neutralizing epitopes. Vaccination is the best method for disease prevention, however current seasonal influenza vaccines stimulate antibodies which are often effective against only antigenically similar strains. To boost the immune responses and increase vaccine effectiveness, adjuvants have been used for the past 20years. The current study explores the use of oil-in-water adjuvant, AF03 to improve an immunogenicity of 2 licensed vaccines. A standard-dose inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4-SD), containing both hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) antigens, and recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4), containing only HA-antigen were adjuvanted with AF03 in naïve BALB/c mouse model. Functional HA-specific antibody titers against all four homologous vaccine strains were enhanced by AF03, indicating potential increase in protective immunity. An increase in HA-specific total immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding titers were detected against homologous HAs, heterologous panel of 30 H3 HAs and seven Influenza B HAs. The neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) activity was significantly higher in IIV4-SD-AF03 group. Use of AF03 adjuvant improved the immune response to two influenza vaccines in a mouse model via an increase in functional and total antibodies against NA and a broad panel of HA-antigens.

Evaluating Potential Impacts of a Preferential Vaccine Recommendation for Adults 65 Years of Age and Older on US Influenza Burden.

High-dose, adjuvanted, and recombinant influenza vaccines may offer improved effectiveness among older adults compared with standard-dose, unadjuvanted, inactivated vaccines. However, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) only recently recommended preferential use of these "higher-dose or adjuvanted" vaccines. One concern was that individuals might delay or decline vaccination if a preferred vaccine is not readily available. We mathematically model how a recommendation for preferential use of higher-dose or adjuvanted vaccines in adults ≥65 years might impact influenza burden in the United States during exemplar "high-" and "low-"severity seasons. We assume higher-dose or adjuvanted vaccines are more effective than standard vaccines and that such a recommendation would increase uptake of the former but could cause (i) delays in administration of additional higher-dose or adjuvanted vaccines relative to standard vaccines and/or (ii) reductions in overall coverage if individuals only offered standard vaccines forego vaccination. In a best-case scenario, assuming no delay or coverage reduction, a new recommendation could decrease hospitalizations and deaths in adults ≥65 years by 0%-4% compared with current uptake. However, intermediate and worst-case scenarios, with assumed delays of 3 or 6 weeks and/or 10% or 20% reductions in coverage, included projections in which hospitalizations and deaths increased by over 7%. We estimate that increased use of higher-dose or adjuvanted vaccines could decrease influenza burden in adults ≥65 in the United States provided there is timely and adequate access to these vaccines, and that standard vaccines are administered when they are unavailable.

An Economic Comparison in the Elderly of Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine with Recombinant Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Spain.

Influenza infections impose a high burden of morbidity and mortality among older adults, at great cost to individuals and society. Enhanced influenza vaccines, which contain either an immune adjuvant or higher than normal doses of influenza virus antigens, are recommended for older adults. We used a health economics model to evaluate the cost effectiveness in Spain of a recently licensed recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVr), which contains three times the standard dose of influenza virus hemagglutinin but no neuraminidase, compared with an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV). Based on current tender prices in Spain and a conservative assumption that QIVr is 10.7% relatively more effective than aQIV, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for QIVr was EUR 101,612.41 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. To meet the Spanish willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 25,000 per QALY gained, QIVr would need to be 34.1% relatively more effective than aQIV. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis conducted to confirm the robustness of the analysis, 99.7% of simulations for QIVr were higher than the willingness-to-pay curve. These findings suggest that QIVr is not currently a cost-effective influenza vaccine option relative to aQIV for older persons living in Spain.

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United States, 2023.

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United States, 2023.

Transverse myelitis following bivalent COVID‐19 booster vaccine and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine

Transverse myelitis following bivalent <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 booster vaccine and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine

Vaccine effectiveness of recombinant and standard dose influenza vaccines against outpatient illness during 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 calculated using a retrospective test-negative design

ABSTRACT Newer influenza vaccine formulations have entered the market, but real-world effectiveness studies are not widely conducted until there is sufficient uptake. We conducted a retrospective test-negative case-control study to determine relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of recombinant influenza vaccine or RIV4, compared with standard dose vaccines (SD) in a health system with significant RIV4 uptake. Using the electronic medical record (EMR) and the Pennsylvania state immunization registry to confirm influenza vaccination, VE against outpatient medically attended visits was calculated. Immunocompetent outpatients ages 18–64 years seen in hospital-based clinics or emergency departments who were tested for influenza using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 influenza seasons were included. Propensity scores with inverse probability weighting were used to adjust for potential confounders and determine rVE. Among this mostly white and female cohort of 5,515 individuals, 510 were vaccinated with RIV4 and 557 were vaccinated with SD, with the balance of 4,448 (81%) being unvaccinated. Adjusted influenza VE estimates were 37% overall (95% CI = 27, 46), 40% (95% CI = 25, 51) for RIV4 and 35% (95% CI = 20, 47) for standard dose vaccines. Overall, rVE of RIV4 compared to SD was not significantly higher (11%; 95% CI = −20, 33). Influenza vaccines were moderately protective against medically attended outpatient influenza during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 seasons. Although the point estimates are higher for RIV4, the large confidence intervals around VE estimates suggest this study was underpowered to detect significant rVE of individual vaccine formulations.

2322. Effectiveness of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccines Against Hospitalized Influenza-Related Outcomes in Adults: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Abstract Background More effective influenza vaccines are needed to prevent influenza and its complications. Recombinant influenza vaccines may offer better protection than traditional egg-based vaccines. Using a cluster randomized design to estimate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of Flublok Quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) vs. standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV4), we separately reported that RIV4 provided significantly better protection against primary outcome of confirmed influenza in adults 50–64 yrs in the 2018–20 moderately severe influenza seasons. Here we report the rVE against the secondary and exploratory outcomes of hospitalized influenza-related outcomes. Methods We randomized 66 facilities within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) to routinely administer RIV4 or SD-IIV4 to adults, alternating vaccine formulations weekly by facility during the influenza season (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03694392). Hospitalized cases of PCR-confirmed influenza, community-acquired pneumonia, and cardio-respiratory events were prespecified as secondary in 50–64 yrs and exploratory in 18–49 yrs. We estimated the relative hazard ratio (rHR) using Cox regression on a calendar timeline, adjusting for age, sex, and race, using facility-specific stabilized propensity scores. We calculated rVE as (1–rHR) x 100%. Results During the 2018–19 and 2019–20 seasons, the study consisted of 1,630,328 vaccinees 18–64 yrs (RIV4=632,962; SD-IIV4=997,366), and included 95 hospitalized influenza cases after RIV4 and 153 after SD-IIV4 among 50–64 yrs (Table 1). RIV4 vs. SD-IIV4 was not significantly more protective against hospitalized influenza-related outcomes in adults 50–64 yrs or 18–49 yrs. Conclusion While this large cluster randomized study found that RIV4 vs. SD-IIV4 reduced the risk of lab-confirmed influenza in adults 50–64 yrs across 2 influenza seasons, RIV4 and SD-IIV4 performed similarly against hospitalized influenza-related outcomes. Evaluating influenza-related hospitalizations during influenza seasons when more hospital outcomes occur may help to better understand the relative effectiveness of recombinant versus standard inactivated influenza vaccines against severe disease. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.