Recognition Committee Research Articles

IEEE Journal of Microwaves 2021/2022 Outstanding Reviewers [Review Recognition

At <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IEEE Journal of Microwaves</i> ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">JMW</i> ), we believe that quality reviewers deserve some extra recognition! As such, we have just established an “Outstanding Reviewers” program wherein at the end of each year, both authors and editors are solicited to search through their past papers and nominate particular reviews that made a real difference to the quality of a particular manuscript or the ability of an editor to make a decision on the true merits of a submitted paper. After considerable effort, we also convinced both the IEEE Microwave Theory and Technology Society (MTT-S) Awards Committee and the IEEE Technical Activities Board Awards and Recognition Committee chairs that we could/should recognize individuals who have gone above and beyond in evaluating manuscripts. Especially important to the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">JMW</i> editor-in-chief are the recommendations of authors—many of whom had lots of extra work to do after receiving their reviewer comments—in suggesting reviews that really helped them improve their submissions. It might surprise you to hear that the authors who had to do the most work to satisfy their reviewers were the ones who made the majority of the nominations.

A Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Neonatal Right Ventricular Function in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Babies.

Background The right ventricle (RV) in the fetus is the predominant chamber, accounting for about 60% of the total cardiac output. The majority of the RV outflow volume is diverted from the pulmonary artery via the ductus arteriosus to the descending aorta. After birth, the RV undergoes extensive structural and functional modifications. The RV undergoes an improper transition from fetal to neonatal circulation in sick neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) babies. Functional echocardiography is now commonly being used in most NICUs as it is a noninvasive and bedside investigation that gives an immediate evaluation of hemodynamics and can be taken into consideration as an extension of clinical assessment to study a critically unwell neonate. Therefore, a study of RV functions in NICU neonates will help in better understanding the neonatal cardiopulmonary response to different diseases. Thus, this study aimed to assess RV functions in neonates getting admitted to the NICU of a tertiary care institute. Methodology This observational, cross-sectional study was approved by the Research & Recognition Committee of Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune. In total, 35 cases of term neonates admitted to the NICU at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study after obtaining consent from their parents. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed by a trained pediatric cardiologist, and the findings were substantiated by a neonatologist trained in echocardiography. Results Our study found a strong associationbetween tricuspid inflow velocity and neonates with sepsis. Similarly, a significant association was observed betweenabnormal tricuspid Inflow velocity (E/A and E/E')andneonates requiring inotropic support. Conclusions Data on the normal values of different echocardiographic parameters of the systolic and diastolic function of the RV during the neonatal phase of life are currently limited. Our data offer preliminary insights into this topic. Early echocardiography and intervention are advisable, especially in neonates with sepsis and requiring inotropic support.

A Critical Reflection on the Experience of Non-Physician ("Public") Members in Milestones 2.0 Work Groups.

A Critical Reflection on the Experience of Non-Physician ("Public") Members in Milestones 2.0 Work Groups.

Awards and Recognition Committee: 2019 Awards

Awards and Recognition Committee: 2019 Awards

2018 IEEE Educational Activities Board Awards

THE 2018 IEEE Educational Activities Board (EAB), chaired by IEEE Educational Activities Vice President Witold Kinsner, upon the recommendation of the EAB Awards and Recognition Committee (ARC) has named the recipients of the 2018 IEEE EAB Awards. EAB Awards recognize and honor individuals and companies for major contributions to engineering and technical education. Awards are given for meritorious activities in accreditation, continuing education, educational innovation, pre-university education, service to the IEEE EAB, standards education, employee professional development, and informal education systems, as well as related achievements that advance the practice of engineering and engineering education.

2017 IEEE Educational Activities Board Awards

The 2017 IEEE Educational Activities Board (EAB), chaired by IEEE Educational Activities Vice President S. K. Ramesh, upon the recommendation of the EAB Awards and Recognition Committee (ARC) has named the recipients of the 2017 IEEE EAB Awards. EAB Awards recognize and honor individuals and companies for major contributions to engineering and technical education. Awards are given for meritorious activities in accreditation, continuing education, educational innovation, pre-university education, service to the IEEE EAB, standards education, employee professional development, and informal education systems, as well as related achievements that advance the practice of engineering and engineering education.

The European Section and Board of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The European Section and Board of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ESBGH) is one of the Specialist Sections of UEMS (The European Union of Medical Specialists), which was founded in 1958 and represents >1.6 million Medical Specialists, working in 37 countries. Two delegates from each UEMS member country are selected as National Delegates. The Section & Board meet twice a year. The routine business of the Section and Board of Gastroenterology & Hepatology is carried out by an Executive Committee. Two delegates from each UEMS member country are selected as National Delegates to provide a balance between professional defenders and academics. The Section & Board meet twice a year. The newly revised curriculum, with UEG, EASL and the EJD represented on the writing group, is available at http://www.eubogh.org/blue-book. The ESBGH knowledge-based multiple choice examination has been running since 2014 and the fourth examination will take place on 27 April 2017 (applications open 29 December 2016). For further details see http://www.eubogh.org/exam. Continuing Medical Education (CME Committee): Chair, Ludwig Kramer; ludwig.kramer@wienkav.at Training Recognition Committee (TRC Committee) : Chair, Nurdan Tozun; nurdan.tozun@acibadem.edu.tr The TRC assesses applicants for the award of the Diploma/Fellowship of the European Section and Board of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. The TRC also inspects Gastroenterology Training Centres throughout Europe and recognises Centres of sufficient standard as a recognised ‘Training Centre of the European Board of Gastroenterology & Hepatology’. Manpower & Public Affairs Committee (M&PA Committee): Chair, Gian Dorta; gian.dorta@chuv.ch Examinations Committee (EC Committee): Chair, Dr Hannu Nuutinen; hannu.nuutinen@hus.fi The Examinations Committee is responsible for maintaining the Academic standards of the ESBGH examination by taking part in Question Writing and Standard Setting. The ESBGH Exam is a fully validated assessment of knowledge of gastroenterology and hepatology as laid down in The Blue Book. Eligibility requirements: There are no restrictions to entry for the ESBGH exam. There is no limit to the number of attempts that can be made. For doctors in formal Gastroenterology and Hepatology training programmes, success is more likely if the exam is taken after the first year. The remit of the ESBGH exam: Success in this exam is a demonstration of having achieved the knowledge necessary to fulfil the requirements of the ESBGH curriculum, which is a Europe-wide description of the level expected of a specialist Gastroenterologist and Hepatologist. The first exam was held on 23 April 2014. Fifty candidates sat in test centres. A post-exam survey had positive evaluations on the content of the exam and about the administration of the exam, the quality of the test centres, etc. The number of candidates doubled in 2015 and 2016. The European ESBGH Exam is now mandatory in Switzerland and the Netherlands. The Examination will be translated into Polish in 2017. The ESBGH maintains contact with stakeholders through our website www.eubogh.org. The website contains comprehensive information about The Blue Book, the ESBGH Fellowship and accreditation of Training Centres. Common Interest Group 2014–2015 Hot spot – ‘The Future of GI Education’ 2016 Collaboration on targeted provision of Training and Education. ESBGH booth at UEG meetings. President of the Section: Dr Jean Paul Jacques; jacques.gastro@gmail.com President of the Board: Dr Ian Barrison; i.g.barrison@herts.ac.uk Secretary General, Section & Board: Dr Isabelle Cremers; cremers.tavares@gmail.com Treasurer, Section & Board: Dr Jan Lillienau: jan.lillienau@skane.se Secretariat Contact: Ana Tavares; executivesecretary@eubog.org Website: www.eubogh.org

2016 IEEE Educational Activities Board Awards

The 2016 IEEE Educational Activities Board (EAB), chaired by IEEE Educational Activities Vice President S. K. Ramesh, upon the recommendation of the EAB Awards and Recognition Committee (ARC) has named the recipients of the 2016 IEEE EAB Awards. EAB Awards recognize and honor individuals and companies for major contributions to engineering and technical education. Awards are given for meritorious activities in accreditation, continuing education, educational innovation, preuniversity education, service to the IEEE EAB, standards education, employee professional development, and informal education systems, as well as related achievements that advance the practice of engineering and engineering education.

2014 AGU Union Medalists, Awardees, and Prize Recipient Announced

On behalf of the Honors and Recognition Committee and the Union award selection committees, we are very pleased to present the 2014 AGU Union medals, awards, and prize recipients. We honor these individuals, whose passion for scientific excellence and outstanding achievements in advancing and communicating science significantly contribute to a better future for us all. Their work truly embodies AGU's vision to “advance and communicate science and its power to ensure a sustainable future.”

Utilizing a State Level Volunteer Recognition Program at the County Level

Volunteer recognition is an important component of Extension programs. Most land-grant universities have implemented a state volunteer recognition program. Extension professionals, however, are too overburdened with meetings, programs, and activities to effectively recognize volunteers locally. Utilizing a state model is an efficient means of recognizing volunteers. This article presents an idea that Extension professionals can utilize to implement a statewide volunteer recognition program on the county level. The first step is to appoint a volunteer recognition committee that will utilize the state recognition categories and identify and nominate worthy volunteers for their programmatic contributions at both the county and state levels.

2013 AGU Medalists, Awardees, and Prize Recipient Announced

The Honors and Recognition Committee is proud to present the 2013 AGU honorees. These individuals have distinguished themselves by their transformational discoveries, persistence, dedication, and pursuit of excellence. We are pleased to recognize their breakthrough achievements in advancing Earth and space science and their outstanding contributions and service to the scientific community. Their passion, vision, creativity, and leadership have expanded our scientific understanding, have illuminated new research directions, and have made Earth and space science thrilling, immediate, and relevant to audiences beyond as well as within the scientific community.

From the editors' desk

The Awards and Recognition Committee, chaired by Clive Reed, spearheaded this special issue in recognition of Professor John Tanaka's contribution to the field of dielectrics and electrical insulation.

Aligning the honors program with AGU's mission

Over the past 2 years, AGU's Honors and Recognition (H&amp;R) Committee (http://www.agu.org/about/governance/committees_boards/honors‐recog.shtml) has been working to better align the Union medals, awards, and prizes with AGU's new vision, core values, and strategic plan. The changes described below have been approved by the AGU Council. The H&amp;R Committee reviewed and evaluated its charge to see how it can be aligned to better support AGU's strategic plan (http://www.agu.org/about/strategic_plan.shtml). The committee formally defined medals, awards, and prizes. Medals are given for a scientific body of work in Earth and space sciences. Awards are related to science, society, and talent pool goals. Prizes are presented jointly by AGU and some other nonprofit, for‐profit, government, and/or nongovernmental entities and involve significant funding.

2012 AGU medal, award, and prize recipients

The Honors and Recognition Committee is very pleased to present the 2012 AGU medalists, awardees, and prize recipients. These individuals are recognized for their outstanding contributions to the advancement of Earth and space science and for their service to the scientific community. They have distinguished themselves through their extraordinary achievements and are role models for future generations of scientists. We look forward to recognizing the accomplishments of these esteemed colleagues at an honors ceremony to be held on 5 December 2012 at the Fall Meeting in San Francisco, Calif. This year's honorees are also listed on AGU's Web site at http://sites.agu.org/honors.

Does gender bias influence awards given by societies?

AGU is a participant in a U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)–funded project called Advancing Ways of Awarding Recognition in Disciplinary Societies (AWARDS), which seeks to examine whether gender bias affects selection of recipients of society awards. AGU is interested in learning why there is a higher proportion of female recipients of service and education awards over the past 2 decades. Combined with a lower rate of receipt of research awards, these results suggest that implicit (subconscious) bias in favor of male candidates still influences awardee selection. Six other professional societies (American Chemical Society, American Mathematical Society, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Mathematical Association of America, Society for Neuroscience, and Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) are participating in the project. Volunteers from each participant society attended an Association for Women in Science (AWIS)–sponsored workshop in May 2010 to examine data and review literature on best practices for fair selection of society awardees. A draft proposal for implementing these practices will be brought before the AGU Council and the Honors and Recognition Committee at their upcoming meetings.

2011 AGU medalists and awardees

The Honors and Recognition Committee is pleased to announce AGU's 2011 medalists and awardees. The scientists listed below will be recognized at the annual honors ceremony, which this year will be held on 7 December at the Fall Meeting in San Francisco. Through these honors, AGU is proud to celebrate their outstanding achievements in the advancement of geophysical sciences and service to the community.

2010 AGU Medalists and Awardees

The Honors and Recognition Committee is pleased to present the 2010 AGU medalists and awardees. We recognize and honor our colleagues' outstanding contributions to the advancement of the geophysical sciences and their service to the community.

Developing Criteria for Recognizing Excellence in Undergraduate Human Factors Education

The purpose of this panel is report on the work of the Undergraduate Program Recognition Committee and to encourage discussion among attendees on the proposed criteria developed by the committee. The paper and the panel discussion will provide an overview of the graduate program accreditation process, report on the work of the Special Task Force on Undergraduate Program, and propose criteria that can be used to recognize the various types of human factors programs that currently exist.

The relation of EBCOG and the UEMS section with the scientific organisations in Europe

The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (EBCOG) is the board of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. EBCOG is represented by 33 National Societies of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Two national delegates per society constitutes EBCOG and Section Council. Council is the decision-making organ and elects the EBCOG and section officers and executive members. EBCOG has a close relation with the European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ENTOG). ENTOG is represented in council and executive and in major committees of EBCOG. EBCOG and the UEMS section have recognised four subspecialties in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Maternal Fetal Medicine, Gynaecological Oncology, Reproductive Medicine and Urogynaecology. These subspecialties are represented in the EBCOG council and executive and also in the major committees by the scientific organisations: the European Association of Perinatal Medicine (EAPM), the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Urogynaecology Association (EUGA). The most important aim of EBCOG is the harmonisation and the improvement of the training and care in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Europe for the profit of the women and the unborn and newborn child. Two important permanent committees are responsible for reaching these goals: The Hospital Recognition Committee (HRC) and the Standing Committee for Training and Assessment (SCTA). The HTC has visited already 70 departments for basic training in nearly all the European countries. The departments which have a successful visit receive an EBCOG accreditation as a training centre. The final purpose is that the National Societies take over this task and perform visits in their own country. Recently, EBCOG, together with the subspecialties, have started visits in units dealing with subspecialist formation.Visits are jointly done by EBCOG and the Subspecialist Scientific Organisations. Accreditation has been forwarded in centres of Gynaecological Oncology and Urogynaecology. Maternal Fetal medicine and Reproductive medicine will follow shortly. A second permanent committee is the SCTA. The SCTA is composed of EBCOG delegates, ENTOG, the four subspecialties and three other scientific organizations: the European Society of Contraception (ESC), the European Society of Gynaecologic Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Federation of Colposcopy (EFC). The SCTA has produced training programmes and logbooks for basic training and subspecialist training. These training programmes are accepted by the national societies and are used when visits are performed in departments and subspecialist units. Recently, the SCTA has started a programme on “Training the Trainers (TTT)”. The subspecialist societies and the three other European Scientific organisations are involved in this programme.

Inspection and Recognition Committee

Inspection and Recognition Committee