This study compared the quality and quantity of newly formed bone in rabbits' critical-sized calvarial defects filled with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) combined with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) vs FDBA alone. A total of 24 adult male white New Zealand rabbits were included. In each rabbit, three bone defects with a diameter of 8 mm were created on the calvarium bone; the first defect was left untreated, while the second was filled with FDBA, and the third was filled with EMD + FDBA. Twelve rabbits were randomly euthanized after a month, and the remaining 2 month postsurgery. Bone sections were histologically evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK) immune-histochemical staining. An improvement in the newly formed bone percentage was found in the defects filled with EMD + FDBA in comparison with FDBA and control defects at 1 month and 2 months postsurgery. Additionally, the expression of VEGF, ALP, OPG, and RANK showed highly significant differences in the defects filled with EMD + FDBA compared to the FDBA and control ones at 1 month postsurgery (p = 0.001). Meanwhile, VEGF and ALP expression showed a significant decrease in defects filled with EMD + FDBA compared to the FDBA and control ones (p = 0.001), while OPG and RANK expression showed non-significant differences between treated groups at 2 months postsurgery. Enamel matrix derivative combined with FDBA has a synergistic effect on bone formation and graft substitution. This combination accelerates the expression of VEGF, ALP, OPG, and RANK. The combination of EMD and FDBA accelerates and ameliorates the quality of newly formed bone, aiding in maxillofacial reconstruction. How to cite this article: Zakri RN, Grawish ME, Mowafey B, et al. Impact of Freeze-dried Corticocancellous Bone Allograft Combined with Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Critical-sized Calvarial Bone Defects: An Animal Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(5):424-431.
Read full abstract