Receptor Negative Early Breast Cancer Research Articles

Cost-effectiveness of early vs delayed use of abemaciclib combination therapy for patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer.

Abemaciclib was newly approved for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Clinical guidelines recommended abemaciclib as the first-line treatment for HR+/ HER2- EBC (early use) or HR+/ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (delayed use). To compare the cost-effectiveness of early vs delayed use of abemaciclib for treatment of HR+/HER2- high-risk EBC. Early use was defined as combined abemaciclib and endocrine therapy as first-line therapy for EBC, followed by treatment with fulvestrant for MBC. Delayed use was defined as endocrine therapy for EBC, followed by combined abemaciclib and fulvestrant therapy for MBC. A 5-state model was developed to estimate lifetime costs, life-years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of hypothetical patients with HR+/ HER2- EBC from a third-party US payer's perspective. Key clinical and safety data were derived from the monarchE and MONARCH 2 clinical trials. Costs, utilities, and disutility values of adverse events were obtained from the literature. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of early vs delayed abemaciclib use and compared it with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per LY or QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed to test the robustness of the base-case model. Base-case analysis showed early use yielded 21.08 LYs and 17.93 QALYs for $586,213 and delayed use yielded 11.14 LYs and 9.38 QALYs for $157,576. The ICER of early vs delayed use was $43,136/LY and $50,104/QALY, which was cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $100,000. The PSA result indicated that a 94.6% likelihood of early use (vs delayed use) was cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $100,000 per QALY. This study suggests that giving abemaciclib in the early stage rather than waiting until patients develop metastatic disease (current standard of care in MBC) is a cost-effective strategy.

Adjuvant treatment strategy evolution and risk stratification for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative early breast cancer in China.

Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) with high-risk clinicopathological features face an increased risk of recurrence. This study explored the evolving treatment landscape and clinical outcomes in patients with EBC using a nationwide database. The study cohort comprised HR+/HER2-, stages 1-3, patients with EBC who underwent surgery and received adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) from January 2013 to March 2021. High-risk patients were defined by ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 positive lymph node(s) with at least one high-risk feature (histologic grade 3, tumor size ≥5 cm, or Ki-67 ≥20%). A low-risk cohort included patients not meeting the criteria. Survival analysis was conducted with a cutoff of September 2021. The study included 4088 eligible patients (1310 high-risk patients and 2778 low-risk patients). High-risk patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to low-risk patients. From 2013 to 2021, an increasing proportion of patients received aromatase inhibitors and ovarian function suppression as part of their AET. The 2-, 5-, and 7-year invasive disease-free survival for high-risk cohort were 90.67%, 75.26%, and 57.10%, respectively, these rates were notably higher for low-risk cohort at 97.14%, 89.85%, and 84.83%. High-risk patients demonstrated a higher risk of recurrence or death compared with low-risk patients (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.82-3.12). In the setting of standard or even intensive AET, patients with EBC with high-risk features still present high recurrence risk, highlighting the urgent need for innovative adjuvant treatment strategies.

Correlation ofKi-67 proliferative index with oncotype DX recurrence score in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer with low-burden axillary nodal disease - areview of137 cases.

Theuse ofchemotherapy in breast cancer management has significantly contributed to thedecrease in its mortality. Currently, theprognosis is determined by molecular biomarkers, such as oestrogen receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. However, theincreasing use ofadvanced molecular technologies, including oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX-RS), has provided theability to estimate therisk ofrecurrence. Research has demonstrated that theODX-RS helps to predict recurrence risk and thepotential benefit ofchemotherapy in breast cancer. As aresult, it can assist clinicians in making decisions regarding using thechemotherapy. Thegoal ofwork is to explore thecorrelation between theODX-RS and Ki-67 proliferative index (Ki-67-PI). This study included 137 patients with oestrogen positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer, and had non- or early axillary disease. Patients with low Ki-67-PI were as follows: low ODX-RS in 17%, intermediate ODX-RS in 80%, and high ODX-RS in 2%. In thehigh Ki-67-PI group: low ODX-RS in 12%, intermediate ODX-RS in 48%, and high ODX-RS in 40%. In conclusion, theresults show no significant correlation between theODX-RS and Ki-67-PI (r = 0.511, p-value < 0.9).

281P Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for hormonal receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

281P Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for hormonal receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have shown advantages in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET. Literature conforming to the research content was identified according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) with adjuvant therapy. The efficacy endpoint of neoadjuvant therapy was complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA). The safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological AEs. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager software (version 5.3). A statistical model (fixed-effects model or random-effects model) was selected based on the level of heterogeneity, and a sensitivity analysis was performed if strong heterogeneity existed. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the baseline patient characteristics. Nine articles (including six RCTs) were included in the study. In adjuvant therapy, compared with the control group, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET showed no statistically significant difference in IDFS [hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-1.08, P = 0.17] and DRFS (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.52-1.31, P = 0.42). In neoadjuvant therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET significantly improved CCCA compared with the control group (odds ratio = 9.00, 95% CI = 5.42-14.96, P < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the combination treatment group had a significantly increased incidence of grade 3-4 hematological AEs in patients, especially grade 3-4 neutropenia [risk ratio (RR) = 63.90, 95% CI = 15.44-264.41, P < 0.00001) and grade 3-4 leukopenia (RR = 85.89, 95% CI = 19.12-385.77, P < 0.00001), with statistically significant differences. In patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer, the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors may prolong IDFS and DRFS in adjuvant therapy, especially in high-risk patients. Further follow-up is needed to establish whether OS can be improved with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET. CDK4/6 inhibitors also showed effective anti-tumor proliferation activity in neoadjuvant therapy. Regular monitoring of routine blood tests in patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors is essential.

Abstract P1-02-01: Comparing the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis

Abstract Background: Five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) including aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and tamoxifen (TAM) is considered the standard of care in hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor–negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer (eBC). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of an AI or TAM depending on menopausal status and clinical risk stratification. Although TAM is generally recommended and more commonly used in premenopausal women, there is mixed evidence for different clinical outcomes. Patient-level meta-analyses conducted by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) showed significantly lower rates of BC recurrence with AIs vs TAM. However, this was not specific to patients with HR+/HER2− eBC. This trial-level meta-analysis was conducted to compare AIs ± ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs TAM ± OFS in HR+/HER2−, pre- and postmenopausal patients with eBC. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using key literature databases, ie, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE In-Process (from database inception to March 2022) and key conferences (2019-2021). Studies selected for the SLR were those that included either ≥80% of patients with HR+/HER2− eBC in the mixed patient population or subgroup data provided specifically for patients with HR+/HER2− eBC. Of these, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating AI ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS and assessing disease-free survival (DFS) were included in the trial-level meta-analysis. This meta-analysis was conducted using the generic invariance method to obtain a pooled effect estimate (hazard ratio [HR]) together with its CI for DFS. This pooled estimate was calculated as a weighted average of the intervention effects estimated in the individual trials. Both fixed- and random-effect models (FEM, REM) were used to estimate the effect size. A base-case analysis was performed including all eligible trials. Three other scenario analyses were conducted: trials investigating only nonsteroidal AIs (NSAIs), assessing only premenopausal women, and assessing only postmenopausal women. Heterogeneity across the trials was assessed using I2 statistic. Results: A total of 5 RCTs comparing AI ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS were eligible for the meta-analysis (SOFT, HOBOE, BIG 1-98, N-SAS BC 03, Li 2019; additional information on rationale for exclusion of specific trials will be reported). Two studies assessing NSAI vs TAM included postmenopausal women, while 3 studies assessing AIs + OFS vs TAM ± OFS included premenopausal women. A total of 6623 patients were followed up for 34-97.2 months across these five trials. Heterogeneity was found to be low (I2 &amp;lt; 40%) across all scenarios. The base-case results (including all studies) using FEM significantly favored AIs ± OFS over TAM ± OFS, with a 29% reduction in risk of recurrence or death (pooled HR, 0.71 [95%CI, 0.64-0.80]). Similar results were observed with NSAIs ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.83]). Among premenopausal patients, the pooled HR for AIs + OFS vs TAM ± OFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79). For postmenopausal women, the HR was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.87), favoring AIs over TAM. The findings for the base-case and different scenarios remained consistent when REM was used. Conclusions: This trial-level meta-analysis suggests significantly greater benefit with AIs than with TAM for HR+/HER2− eBC. Notably, AIs in combination with OFS are associated with a 34% reduction in risk of recurrence or death vs TAM ± OFS in premenopausal women; these results are aligned with the patient-level data findings of the EBCTCG. The findings indicate that AIs ± OFS are associated with a better DFS in the HR+/HER2− population, especially premenopausal women, than TAM ± OFS. Citation Format: Wolfgang Janni, Michael Untch, Nadia Harbeck, Joseph Gilgorov, William Jacot, Stephen K. Chia, Jean-Francois Boileau, Sina Haftchenary, Rhea Gupta, Namita Mishra, Purnima Pathak, Giuseppe Curigliano. Comparing the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-02-01.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy De-Escalation with Genomic Assay Protocol in Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Single-Centre Prospective Cohort Study.

Genomic assays are useful tools for tailoring adjuvant treatment in early breast cancer. We aimed to analyse the role of an institutional protocol of a genomic assay for chemotherapy de-escalation. Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer, tested with the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay from August 2015 to July 2018 at a Portuguese cancer centre. For being tested, patients should meet at least one of the pre-defined inclusion criteria: i) luminal A-like, pT2pN0; ii) luminal A-like, 1 - 3 positive nodes and comorbidities with higher risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity; iii) pT1-2pN0, progesterone receptor ≤ 20% and/or Ki67 14% - 40%. Adjuvant treatment was de-escalated to isolated endocrine therapy if RS was less than 18. We measured the reduction in chemotherapy prescribing and its clinical impact, the RS association with pathologic features, and the protocol feasibility. We tested 154 women with a median age of 61 years old (range: 25 - 79), 69% postmenopausal. Tumours were mainly pT1 (55%), pN0 (82%), invasive ductal (73%), G2 (86%), luminal B-like (69%) and stage IA (85%). We obtained a RS less than 18 in 60% of women, with an overall adjuvant chemotherapy reduction of 65%. Seven (95% confidence interval: 5 - 10) patients needed to be screened with the 21-gene RS assay to prevent one clinically relevant adverse event during the first six months of adjuvant treatment. Considering the currently used RS cut-off, only 9% of node-negative and 11% of node-positive patients had RS over 25. We found no relevant associations between RS and pathologic features. The protocol was feasible and did not compromise the adequate timing for adjuvant treatment. These criteria allowed the de-escalation of adjuvant systemic treatment in at least six out of ten women.

E3 Ubiquitin Ligase NEDD4 Affects Estrogen Receptor α Expression and the Prognosis of Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated 4-1 (NEDD4) is an E3 ligase that leads to the degradation of proteins, including estrogen receptor α. We evaluated whether the expression level of NEDD4 affected the outcome of breast cancer patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study enrolling 143 patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer. Of the 66 patients with high NEDD4 mRNA levels (high NEDD4 group) and 77 patients with low NEDD4 mRNA levels (low NEDD4 group), 98.4% and 96.1%, respectively, of the patients had received neoadjuvant/adjuvant hormone therapy. Disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in the low NEDD4 group than in the high NEDD4 group (p = 0.048 and p = 0.022, respectively). Western blotting revealed a high expression of estrogen receptor α in the NEDD4-knockdown culture cells. The proliferation of NEDD4-knockdown cells treated with tamoxifen or estradiol deprivation was suppressed, compared with that of NEDD4-expressing cells. Knockdown of NEDD4 in breast cancer cells induced the accumulation of estrogen receptor α and increased sensitivity to hormone therapy. In summary, this mechanism may lead to a better prognosis in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with a low expression of NEDD4.

Correlation of the Ki67 Working Group prognostic risk categories with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in early breast cancer.

The relationship between Ki67 assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between the 21-gene RS and IHC-measured Ki67 with the prognostic classification groups recommended by the International Ki67 Working Group (IKWG). The authors performed a retrospective chart review of women who had hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer with zero to three positive lymph nodes and both Ki67 and the 21-gene RS performed at their institution from 2013 to 2021. Patients were categorized into low (≤5%), intermediate (6%-29%), and high Ki67 groups (≥30%) according to IKWG recommendations. Overall agreement and risk-stratified agreement between Ki67 and RS were assessed with the proportion of agreement and the κ statistic. The study included 525 patients with HR-positive breast cancer. Among the 49% of patients with intermediate Ki67 values of 6%-29%, the distribution of low (0-10), intermediate (11-25), and high RS (26-100) was 19%, 66%, and 15%, respectively. There was slight agreement (κ=0.01-0.20) between Ki67 and RS (κ=0.027) in the overall population, although this was not significant (p=.1985). There was fair agreement (κ=0.21-0.40) between high Ki67 and RS values (κ=0.280; p < .0001). A higher progesterone receptor percentage was associated with lower RS values (p > .0001) but not lower Ki67 values. A positive nodal status and a larger tumor size were associated with higher Ki67 values (p=.0059 and p < .0001) but not with RS. In this group of patients selected to have a 21-gene RS, there was no significant correlation between Ki67 and RS in the overall population, and there was fair agreement between high Ki67 and high RS values. In patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy are based on certain biological features of the cancer and genomic assays such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS). The goal of this study was to determine the correlation between Ki67, a marker of proliferation, and the Oncotype DX RS, a 21-gene assay demonstrated to be predictive of an adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with early-stage breast cancer. In 525 patients, the authors did not find a significant correlation between Ki67 and RS.

A real-world retrospective study of the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, HER2− early breast cancer in the United States

BackgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer be considered for adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after primary treatment like surgical excision. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) use primarily depends on risk of recurrence. Biomarkers such as Ki-67 potentially have most value in patients with intermediate risk factors, such as involvement of 1–3 positive nodes. This study evaluated the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer.MethodsThis was an observational retrospective cohort study of patients with electronic medical records from January 2010 to August 2018 treated for HR+, HER2− early breast cancer at Sarah Cannon sites in the United States (US). Overall, 567 patients were randomly selected after using the eligibility criteria: female or male ≥18 years, without distant metastases, and with available physician and pathology reports. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors predicting Ki-67 testing and test results. Descriptive analyses were applied to treatment patterns.ResultsMultivariable logistic regression analyses found no clinical or pathological factors that predicted whether Ki-67 testing had been ordered by physicians. Of all tested patients (N = 130), having Grade-2 tumors (OR, 7.95 [95% CI: 2.05, 30.9]; p = 0.0027) or Grade-3 tumors (OR, 95.3 [95% CI, 11.9, 760.7]; p < 0.001) at initial diagnosis was a predictor of high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). Ki-67 expression was tested in 23.6% (61/258) of patients with 1–3 positive nodes; 54.1% of them (33/61) had high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). While having a higher grade tumor predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%), 28.6% of patients with Grade-1 tumors also had high Ki-67 expression. Neo-adjuvant therapy was received by 16.0% of patients (91/567), most of whom (66/91; 72.5%) received CT alone. Adjuvant therapy, either endocrine and/or chemotherapy, was received by 92.6% (525/567) of patients and by 67.0% (61/91) of those who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Most (428/525, 81.5%) received ET in the adjuvant treatment setting.ConclusionsHigh grade tumors predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%) expression, but Ki-67 testing was not widely used in these US patients. Most HR+, HER2− early breast cancers were treated with adjuvant ET, with or without CT.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09557-6.

Association of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy Timing With Overall Survival Among Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2–Negative Early Breast Cancer Without Chemotherapy

Studies have shown that delayed initiation of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with lower rates of breast cancer survival. However, it remains unclear whether delayed initiation of adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) is associated with survival. To assess the association of time to adjuvant hormone therapy (TTH) with breast cancer survival and evaluate the factors associated with AHT. This cohort study examined data from the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2014 to assess the association of TTH (stratified as ≤150 and >150 days) with cancer survival. All patients included were diagnosed with stage I to stage III hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2)-negative invasive breast cancer and underwent AHT without chemotherapy. Data were analyzed from April 2019 to May 2020. AHT was administered at different time points following surgical procedures for breast cancer treatment. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model was constructed to evaluate overall survival by adjusting for treatment facility, patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment; multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess factors associated with delayed treatment. A total of 144 103 patients (median [IQR] follow-up, 36.6 months [25.5-49.2 months]; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [11.6] years) were identified, which included 142 916 (99.2%) women, 11 574 (8.0%) Black patients, and 126 013 (87.4%) White patients. Of these, 134 873 patients (93.6%) had a TTH of 150 days or less and 9230 patients (6.4%) had a TTH longer than 150 days. The IPTW-based Cox model demonstrated that patients with delayed AHT (ie, a TTH past 150 days) were associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.26-1.35; P < .001) compared with those receiving the timely treatment (TTH ≤150 days). Several sensitivity analyses (including IPTW with stabilized weight [HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19-1.45; P < .001], propensity score matching [HR, 1.41; 1.13-1.76; P = .002], and propensity score regression adjustment [HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16-1.43; P < .001]) and exploratory subgroup analyses yielded similar trends. Factors associated with delayed AHT included Black racial identity (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.55-1.77), nonprivate insurance (eg, no insurance: OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70), living in large metropolitan or metropolitan areas (reference vs urban, less urban, or rural: OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.87), treatment in a community hospital (reference vs academic or research: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score 2 or higher (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32), poor grade differentiation (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.32-1.53), II and III pathological stage (stage III: OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.76-3.54), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) or ER-/PR+ (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31), receiving breast conservation surgery (reference vs mastectomy: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94), and radiotherapy (reference vs no radiotherapy: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61). The delay of the initiation of AHT past 150 days was associated with diminished survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative patients with breast cancer who did not receive chemotherapy. Efforts should be made to address factors associated with delayed treatment to improve survival.

A novel immune prognostic index for stratification of high-risk patients with early breast cancer

The prognostic value of current multigene assays for breast cancer is limited to hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer. Despite the prognostic significance of immune response-related genes in breast cancer, immune gene signatures have not been incorporated into most multigene assays. Here, using public gene expression microarray datasets, we classified breast cancer patients into three risk groups according to clinical risk and proliferation risk. We then developed the immune prognostic index based on expression of five immune response-related genes (TRAT1, IL2RB, CTLA4, IGHM and IL21R) and lymph node status to predict the risk of recurrence in the clinical and proliferation high-risk (CPH) group. The 10-year probability of disease-free survival (DFS) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of patients classified as high risk according to the immune prognostic index was significantly lower than those of patients classified as intermediate or low risk. Multivariate analysis revealed that the index is an independent prognostic factor for DFS or DMFS. Moreover, the C-index revealed that it is superior to clinicopathological variables for predicting prognosis. Its prognostic significance was also validated in independent datasets. The immune prognostic index identified low-risk patients among patients classified as CPH, regardless of the molecular subtype of breast cancer, and may overcome the limitations of current multigene assays.

Abstract P3-08-46: Correlation of prognostic indicators based on clinical and pathological features in hormone receptor positive and HER2 receptor negative early breast cancer with the 21 gene assay recurrence score

Abstract Background: With the advent of genomic testing in routine practice to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, in a resource limited health service, many multi-disciplinary breast cancer teams are relying on known clinical and pathological factors to determine which patients undergo testing or to avoid/receive chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative (HR+, HER2 -ve) breast cancer. These factors are manipulated in formulae or in online prognostic calculators to determine "risk". Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® is routinely used in the UK to determine benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer according to National guidelines (NICE) which determines risk using the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and Predict. Methods: With the kind permission of surgical and oncology colleagues within the Wales Cancer Network Breast Clinical Site Group, all patients with HR+, HER2-ve invasive breast cancer who had undergone Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® testing between 31/10/15 and 1/11/18 were matched to the prospectively held national cancer database. Post- operative tumour size, grade, nodal status, age of patient and route of diagnosis were then utilized to calculate the NPI for each case and the PREDICT! on line calculator for chemotherapy benefit in addition to endocrine therapy. A correlation co-efficient was then calculated for NPI, PREDICT 5 and PREDICT 10 to the recurrence score®. Ki 67 is not routinely calculated. Results: There were 734 cases with a RS® available matched to the cancer registry database, 96 of which had missing data items preventing calculation of NPI or PREDICT! values. Demographics of patients tested – n= 734MeanMedianRangeAge (years)585927-97Referral RouteBreast Cancer Screening296GP Referral/ Symptomatic438RS®Low - &amp;lt;18381Intermediate: 18-25202Intermediate: 26-3051High - ≥31100 GradeG143G2457G3225Grade unknown4Tumour Size T1244T2402T346T45Size unknown36Nodal StatusN0528N1mic58N1 (1_3)110Nodal status unknown38 all RS® (n= 638)r co-efficient of correlationNPI0.07Predict 5 year0.09Predict 10 year0.08LN0 (n= 481)NPI0.12Predict 5 year0.11Predict 10 year0.10LN mic (n= 52)NPI0.29Predict 5 year0.40Predict 10 year0.35LN1 (1_3) (n=105)NPI0.02Predict 5 year0.05Predict 10 year0.05 Conclusions: This is the largest cohort analysis in the UK of recurrence score testing published to date and covers a wider range of node negative, micro metastatic and node positive patients. We have demonstrated a weak correlation between the RS® and the NPI or PREDICT outcome in predicting benefit of chemotherapy and we do not believe these clinic-pathological surrogates should be relied upon to determine indications for adjuvant chemotherapy in HR+, HER2-ve early breast cancer patients or in determining if Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® testing should be performed in order to reduce over treatment with chemotherapy. Citation Format: Marianne Dillon, Adam Yarwood, Daniel Thomas, Wales Cancer Network Breast Clinical Steering Group. Correlation of prognostic indicators based on clinical and pathological features in hormone receptor positive and HER2 receptor negative early breast cancer with the 21 gene assay recurrence score [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-46.

Abstract P4-08-13: Prognostic significance of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy (dds-CT). An observational study (ACTRN12616001043426)

Abstract Background - aim: Information on the prognostic role of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the era of modern adjuvant CT is limited. The primary objective of the present report is to assess the prognostic impact of CD8+ cells in patients with intermediate or high-risk EBC (T1-3N1-2M0) treated with dds-CT. Secondary endpoints are safety, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: Patients (N=1,000) were treated with 4 cycles of Epirubicin, 75mg/m2, and Cyclophophamide, 600mg/m2 every 2 weeks followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxel (D), 100mg/m2 every 3 weeks with G-CSF support in all cycles. Trastuzumab was initiated concurrently with D and continued for a total of 1 year. Hormonal and radiation therapy were given post CT, as indicated. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors were available for 642 patients (64.2%) and were centrally assessed for immunohistochemical subtypes (IHC4; N=526), stromal TILs density by morphology (N=636), as well as stromal and intratumoral cytotoxic CD8+ T cell numbers (N=554). TILs and CD8+ were assessed as continuous variables for associations and as 10% increments for outcome. Results: In total, 901/1,000 pts (90.1%) completed 8 cycles of CT. Severe (gradeIII-IV) toxicitiesincludedneutropenia (5.6%), leucopenia (3.6%), lymphopenia (2.1%), hand-footsyndrome (2.1%), and hepatotoxicity (1.8%). Febrileneutropenia occurred in 1.6% of the patients. The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 89.5% and 93.1%, respectively. Luminal A tumors were classified in 26.2%, Luminal B in 35.2%, luminal HER2 in 9.5%; HER2-enriched in 7.2%; and, triple-negative (TNBC) in 21.9% of informative patients. Among subtypes, stromal TILs density was higher in HER2-enriched and TNBC (p&amp;lt;0.001); intratumoral CD8+ values were higher in TNBC (p&amp;lt;0.001); and, stromal CD8+ were higher in HER2-enriched (p=0.034). In all patients, TILs density and intratumoral CD8+ cell numbers were not associated with DFS and OS, while increased stromal CD8+ were marginally associated with prolonged DFS (HR=0.98, 95%CI 0.96-1.00, p=0.066).Adjusted for histological grade, menopausal, ER/PgR and nodal status, higher stromal CD8+ were associated with prolonged DFS (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00, p=0.043). In TNBC, higher stromal TILs density conferred prolonged DFS (HR=0.97, 95%CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.029), which retained its prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00, p=0.049). Conclusions: In this study, dds-CT was well tolerated and active in patients with EBC. We confirm the presence of morphologically assessed higher TILs density, and of higher cytotoxic CD8+ T cell numbers in hormone receptor negative EBC, as well as the favorable prognostic impact of higher stromal TILs density in TNBC. In comparison to stromal TILs density, higher stromal CD8+ may confer favorable prognosis irrespectively of EBC subtype. Stromal CD8+ seems to be a marker worth further standardizing for reporting on immune cell infiltrates in EBC. Citation Format: Kourea HP, Koletsa T, Kotoula V, Koliou G-A, Batistatou A, Pentheroudakis G, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Zagouri F, Bobos M, Sotiropoulou M, Papoudou-Bai A, Chrisafi S, Efstratiou I, Aravantinos G, Nicolaou I, Gogas H, Visvikis A, Christodoulou C, Petraki C, Koutras A, Psyrri A, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G. Prognostic significance of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy (dds-CT). An observational study (ACTRN12616001043426) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-13.

Prognostic role for the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in early breast cancer: a GEICAM/9906 substudy.

Elevated markers of host inflammation, a hallmark of cancer, have been associated with worse outcomes in several solid tumors. Here, we explore the prognostic role of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), across different tumor subtypes, in patients with early breast cancer. This was a retrospective analysis of 1246 patients with lymph node-positive, operable early breast cancer enrolled in the GEICAM/9906 trial, a multicenter randomized phase 3 study evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy. dNLR was calculated as the ratio of neutrophils and the difference between total leukocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood before chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were explored using a Cox proportional hazard analysis. The analysis comprised 1243 (99.8%) patients with dNLR data, with a median follow-up of 10years. Data on intrinsic subtypes were available from 818 (66%) patients (luminal A 34%, luminal B 32%, HER2-enriched 21% and basal-like 9%). Median dNLR was 1.35 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.08-1.71]. In the whole population, dNLR was not prognostic after adjustment for clinico-pathological factors. However, dNLR ≥ 1.35 was independently associated with worse DFS in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2+ population (HR 2.86; p = 0.038) and in patients with one to three lymph node metastases (HR 1.32, p = 0.032). There was a non-significant association with worse DFS in non-luminal and in HER2-enriched tumors (HR 1.40, p = 0.085 and HR 1.53, p = 0.067). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment arm and dNLR. Elevated dNLR appears to be an adverse prognostic factor in hormone receptor-negative early breast cancer. EudraCT: 2005-003108-12 (retrospectively registered 28/06/2005). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129922 (retrospectively registered 10/08/2005). Results of this study were presented in part at the 2016 ESMO conference October 7-11, 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark (oral presentation).

The Association between Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Usage and Breast Cancer Characteristics

Purpose: To evaluate the association between angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) usage and breast cancer characteristics and outcomes. Methods: All patients who were treated in our institute for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer between April 2005 and March 2012 and whose tumors were sent for Oncotype-DX analysis were included. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding ARB usage were retrieved. Usage of several prespecified medications for hypertension was also evaluated. Each medication group was compared with the rest of the cohort. Results: A total of 671 patients were included. Forty-six (7%) patients were treated with ARB. ARB usage was associated with macroscopic nodal involvement (p < 0.001) and a more advanced stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001). These findings remained significant in the multivariate analysis. Patients treated with ARB also had a higher incidence of invasive lobular carcinoma subtype (p = 0.009), a worse 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (94.7 vs. 98.8%, p = 0.024) and a worse 5-year overall survival (94.6 vs. 98.8%, p = 0.015), but these differences were not demonstrated in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients treated with ARB presented with a more advanced breast cancer disease and some distinct histological features. Further research is required to elucidate the effect of ARB treatment on breast cancer.

Absolute Benefit of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapies for Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: TEXT and SOFT Trials.

Risk of recurrence is the primary consideration in breast cancer adjuvant therapy recommendations. The TEXT (Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial) and SOFT (Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial) trials investigated adjuvant endocrine therapies for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, testing exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS), tamoxifen plus OFS, and tamoxifen alone. We examined absolute treatment effect across a continuum of recurrence risk to individualize endocrine therapy decision making for premenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative disease. The TEXT and SOFT hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative analysis population included 4,891 women. The end point was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), defined as time from random assignment to first occurrence of invasive locoregional, distant, or contralateral breast cancer. A continuous, composite measure of recurrence risk for each patient was determined from a Cox model incorporating age, nodal status, tumor size and grade, and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki-67 expression levels. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology revealed differential treatment effects on 5-year BCFI according to composite risk. SOFT patients who remained premenopausal after chemotherapy experienced absolute improvement of 5% or more in 5-year BCFI with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone, reaching 10% to 15% at intermediate to high composite risk; the benefit of tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone was apparent at the highest composite risk. The SOFT no-chemotherapy cohort-for whom composite risk was lowest on average-did well with all endocrine therapies. For TEXT patients, the benefit of exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS in 5-year BCFI ranged from 5% to 15%; patients not receiving chemotherapy and with lowest composite risk did well with both treatments. Premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease and high recurrence risk, as defined by clinicopathologic characteristics, may experience improvement of 10% to 15% in 5-year BCFI with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone. An improvement of at least 5% may be achieved for women at intermediate risk, and improvement is minimal for those at lowest risk.

PO-36 - Thrombin Inhibition Preoperatively (TIP) in early breast cancer, the first clinical trial of NOACs as an anti-cancer agent: trial methodology

Breast cancer is associated with a 3-4 fold increased risk of VTE. These patients have a 4-fold lower survival than those remaining free of VTE, implying VTE is a surrogate marker for aggressive cancer. Tumour expression of thrombin pathway markers are increased in the oestrogen receptor negative (ER-), high Ki67, more aggressive breast cancer subtypes. In in vitro and in vivo studies, the thrombin pathway promotes cancer growth and metastases, highlighting the potential role of the thrombin pathway as a therapeutic target in cancer. To determine whether 14days of a preoperative oral Factor Xa inhibitor (Rivaroxaban) in oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer patients results in inhibition of tumour proliferation as determined by a reduction in tumour Ki67 from baseline (pre-treatment) to 14days post treatment start (at time of surgical excision). The TF-VIIa-FXa complex activates Protease Activated Receptor (PAR)2 to induce angiogensis, growth factors and tumour cell migration. Thrombin, in part via PAR1, induces angiogenesis, tumour cell proliferation as well as in vivo metastasis. In early breast cancer, TF and PAR2 expression is increased in the stroma, particularly in the more aggressive ER-, high Ki67 (proliferation) cancers. Rivaroxaban is an orally active direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Through inhibition of the TF-FVIIa-FXa complex, it can downregulate TF-FVIIa-FXa activation of PAR2, and inhibit conversion of prothrombin to thrombin. We hypothesise that 14days of Rivaroxaban will reduce breast cancer proliferation, as a surrogate marker for anti-cancer efficacy, in early breast cancer patients awaiting resectional surgery. Trial methodology: A multi-centre phase II preoperative 'Window-of Opportunity' randomised controlled trial of Rivaroxaban compared to no treatment in ER-, stage I-III early breast cancer patients. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 (Rivaroxaban 20mg od: Rivaroxaban 10mg od: no treatment) and receive 14 (+/-3) days of treatment in the window between diagnosis and surgery. Randomisation will be blinded to pathologists, but not to patients or clinicians. Primary analysis will be based on the two Rivaroxaban arms being combined to form a Rivaroxaban: no treatment, 2:1 trial design, with change in Ki67 from baseline (pre) to post Rivaroxaban/no treatment (post) being the primary endpoint, and the no treatment arm acting as a reference group. Subgroup analysis of the Rivaroxaban arm (20mg od:10mg od) will allow assessment of dose-response. Funder: National Institute for Health Research Eudract No: 2014-004909-33 REC Number: 15/NW/0406 UKCRN ID: 19731 Expected commencement: January 2016. For further information please contact Chief Investigator: cliona.kirwan@manchester.ac.uk.

Prospective Clinical Utility Study of the Use of the 21-Gene Assay in Adjuvant Clinical Decision Making in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Results From the SWITCH Study.

The 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score assay is a validated assay to help decide the appropriate treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in the adjuvant setting. The choice of adjuvant treatments might vary considerably in different countries according to various treatment guidelines. This prospective multicenter study is the first to assess the impact of the Oncotype DX assay in the French clinical setting. A total of 100 patients with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative EBC, and node-negative (pN0) disease or micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes (pN1mi) were enrolled. Treatment recommendations, physicians' confidence before and after knowing the Recurrence Score value, and physicians' perception of the assay were recorded. Of the 100 patients, 95 were evaluable (83 pN0, 12 pN1mi). Treatment recommendations changed in 37% of patients, predominantly from chemoendocrine to endocrine treatment alone. The proportion of patients recommended chemotherapy decreased from 52% pretest to 25% post-test. Of patients originally recommended chemotherapy, 61% were recommended endocrine treatment alone after receiving the Recurrence Score result. For both pN0 and pN1mi patients, post-test recommendations appeared to follow the Recurrence Score result for low and high values. Physicians' confidence improved significantly. These are the first prospective data on the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions in France. Using the assay was associated with a significant change in treatment decisions and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These data are consistent with those presented from European and non-European studies.

Indispensability of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative early breast cancer in elderly women with diabetes mellitus.

To evaluate whether chemotherapy is indispensable in elderly patients with early estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer and diabetes mellitus (DM), the data on 112 patients, ≥70 years of age, with early, operable ER-negative breast cancer who were treated at the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China, between 2000 and 2010, were analyzed. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) were compared. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic value of DM and chemotherapy for OS, DFS, and BCS. The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that DM at diagnosis, the number of positive lymph nodes, and radiotherapy were associated with OS, the number of positive lymph nodes, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2/neu) status, and radiotherapy were associated with DFS, and the number of positive lymph nodes, tumor size, HER2/neu status, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were associated with BCS. The subsequent multivariate analysis identified DM at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR]=3.797; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.515-9.520; P=0.004) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (with the addition of chemotherapy regimen). Chemotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor for either OS (HR=1.275; 95% CI, 0.614-2.646; P=0.515) or DFS (HR=0.849; 95% CI, 0.445-1.619; P=0.619) when other possible factors that may affect the results were adjusted. In conclusion, chemotherapy was not found to be indispensable for elderly (≥70 years of age) female patients with early ER-negative breast cancer with DM because, particularly in such patients, the treatment of DM may be more important compared with chemotherapy.