Recent Opioid Use Research Articles

Financial needs and opioid use among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors: Baseline findings from the HN-STAR trial (WF-1805CD).

365 Background: HNC survivors often experience post-treatment pain. Given known disparities in pain management and opioid use in the non-cancer population, we explored sociodemographic predictors of opioid use in HNC survivors enrolled in the HN-STAR trial (NCT04208490, funding: American Cancer Society and UG1CA189824). Methods: Survivors of HNC (stages I-III) who completed therapy 6-24 months prior and had no evidence of disease were enrolled throughout the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Survivors were randomized to a clinical informatics intervention or usual care. Baseline surveys elicited recent prescription opioid use in the prior week (yes/no). Blinded to arm assignment, we conducted bivariate analyses of recent opioid use and the following sociodemographic predictors: age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity (non-white/Latinx vs all others), highest level of education, and being able to meet daily financial needs in the prior 4 weeks. We conducted stepwise multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association of these factors on opioid use. Results: Among 254 survivors (mean age 63, 74% male, 25% non-white/non-Latinx, 13% reporting financial need) at 25 oncology practices, 14% (n=35) reported recent opioid use. In bivariate analyses, survivors who reported financial needs were more likely to have used opioids (odds ratio [OR] 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-10.20, p<.001). In stepwise multivariable analyses, only having financial needs remained in the final model (Table). Conclusions: In a national sample of post-treatment HNC survivors during a subacute survivorship period (6-24 months after treatment completion), 1 in 7 survivors reported using opioids in the past week – more than twice the annual rate of opioid receipt in the general adult population. Several demographic factors related to opioid use were examined and not associated with recent opioid use among HNC survivors. Findings suggest that financial concerns may be a barrier to non-narcotic pain management (e.g., cognitive behavioral approaches, physical therapy) – or simply that unmet financial needs are associated with lower quality of pain management. Attention should focus on equitable pain management in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT04208490 . Predictors of opioid use in past week. Bivariate Models Estimate (standard error) p-value Age (years) -.01 (.02) .52 OR (95% CI) p-value Female .98 (.41, 2.16) .97 Latinx/non-white .71 (.27, 1.63) .45 Married .56 (.27, 1.18) .13 Some college or more .62 (.30, 1.30) .20 Had financial needs 4.35 (1.85,10.20) <.001 Final model OR (95% CI) p-value Had financial needs 4.35 (1.85,10.20) <.001

Diagnosis and Treatment of Presumed Naltrexone-XR-precipitated Opioid Withdrawal in a Patient Chronically Treated With Buprenorphine-XR: A Case Report.

Naltrexone, buprenorphine, and methadone are Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder in the United States. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, can precipitate opioid withdrawal if administered too quickly after the use of full or partial opioid agonists for those with either dependence or use disorder. We describe a case of severe precipitated opioid withdrawal syndrome after reported buprenorphine extended-release (XR) administration, despite the patient having been stable on buprenorphine-XR for several years, with no missed doses or recent opioid use. Naltrexone levels were sent and helped to diagnose suspected inadvertent naltrexone-XR administration in this patient, which was likely the etiology of his precipitated opioid withdrawal syndrome. We suggest the use of high-dose buprenorphine, as well as adjunctive medications including benzodiazepines, as a treatment strategy for naltrexone-XR precipitated withdrawal in the setting of chronic buprenorphine-XR treatment.

Substance Use and Anxiety About Pain Among Patients Seeking Abortion Services.

To evaluate how recent opioid, marijuana, and cannabidiol use affects pre-procedure pain-related anxiety for patients seeking abortion. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional anonymous survey of patients seeking abortion assessing recent substance use and anxiety about pain during and after abortion. We compared substance users' and non-users' anxiety scores. Among 217 participants, recent opioid users (5.3%) had higher median anxiety scores for pain during (7.0 vs 6.0; p=0.33) and after (8.0 vs 6.0; p=0.01) abortion than non-opioid users. Anxiety scores were similar for marijuana and cannabidiol users. Assessing recent opioid use may help guide counseling for anxiety about abortion.

Recent Opioid Use Impedes Range Adaptation in Reinforcement Learning in Human Addiction

BackgroundDrugs like opioids are potent reinforcers thought to co-opt value-based decisions by overshadowing other rewarding outcomes, but how this happens at a neurocomputational level remains elusive. Range adaptation is a canonical process of fine-tuning representations of value based on reward context. Here, we tested whether recent opioid exposure impacts range adaptation in opioid use disorder, potentially explaining why shifting decision making away from drug taking during this vulnerable period is so difficult. MethodsParticipants who had recently (<90 days) used opioids (n = 34) or who had abstained from opioid use for ≥ 90 days (n = 20) and comparison control participants (n = 44) completed a reinforcement learning task designed to induce robust contextual modulation of value. Two models were used to assess the latent process that participants engaged while making their decisions: 1) a Range model that dynamically tracks context and 2) a standard Absolute model that assumes stationary, objective encoding of value. ResultsControl participants and ≥90-days-abstinent participants with opioid use disorder exhibited choice patterns consistent with range-adapted valuation. In contrast, participants with recent opioid use were more prone to learn and encode value on an absolute scale. Computational modeling confirmed the behavior of most control participants and ≥90-days-abstinent participants with opioid use disorder (75%), but a minority in the recent use group (38%), was better fit by the Range model than the Absolute model. Furthermore, the degree to which participants relied on range adaptation correlated with duration of continuous abstinence and subjective craving/withdrawal. ConclusionsReduced context adaptation to available rewards could explain difficulty deciding about smaller (typically nondrug) rewards in the aftermath of drug exposure.

The therapeutic potential of opioids in narcolepsy type 1: A systematic literature review and questionnaire study

ObjectiveNarcolepsy type 1 is a primary sleep disorder caused by deficient hypocretin transmission leading to excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. Opioids have been suggested to increase the number of hypocretin-producing neurons. We aimed to assess opioid use and its self-reported effect on narcolepsy type 1 symptom severity through a literature review and questionnaire study. MethodsWe systematically reviewed literature on opioid use in narcolepsy. We also recruited 100 people with narcolepsy type 1 who completed an online questionnaire on opioid use in the previous three years. The main questionnaire topics were the indication for use, and the possible effects on narcolepsy symptom severity. Structured follow-up interviews were conducted when opioid use was reported. ResultsThe systematic literature review mainly showed improvements in narcolepsy symptom severity. Recent opioid use was reported by 16/100 questionnaire respondents, who had used 20 opioids (codeine: 7/20, tramadol: 6/20, oxycodone: 6/20, fentanyl: 1/20). Narcolepsy symptom changes were reported in 11/20. Positive effects on disturbed nocturnal sleep (9/20), excessive daytime sleepiness (4/20), hypnagogic hallucinations (3/17), cataplexy (2/18), and sleep paralysis (1/13) were most pronounced for oxycodone (4/6) and codeine (4/7). ConclusionsOpioids were relatively frequently used compared to a similarly young general Dutch sample. Oxycodone and, to a lesser extent, codeine were associated with self-reported narcolepsy symptom severity improvements. Positive changes in disturbed nocturnal sleep and daytime sleepiness were most frequently reported, while cataplexy effects were less pronounced. Randomised controlled trials are now needed to verify the potential of opioids as therapeutic agents for narcolepsy.

A Scoping Review on the Effects of COVID-19 on Syringe Service Programs in the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had worldwide impacts, including disrupting community services. One interrupted service was syringe service programs (SSPs), community-established initiatives that provide sterile supplies and aid in overcoming addiction in drug-using participants. In the United States (U.S.), SSPs have been key in combating the recent opioid use crisis and associated infections such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C. While some published reports on the pandemic's overall impacts on SSPs exist, certain aspects such as operational changes and repercussions on staff and participants may still be lacking. Information about the impact of interrupted SSP services due to the pandemic may provide insight into how to prepare to mitigate similar outcomes during possible future health outbreaks. The aim of this scoping review was thus to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations, staff, and participants of SSPs in the U.S.The initial search of the databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with selected keywords yielded 117 articles published in English between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2022. After screening each article for study eligibility, 11 articles were included in the final review. Of the seven articles exploring SSP operational impacts from the pandemic, five acknowledged that mitigation strategies influenced functions, seven highlighted supply changes, and four emphasized the resulting staffing changes. Four studies inspected the pandemic's impacts on SSP participants, which included two articles highlighting participants' struggles with isolation and loneliness, one referencing the fear of exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and two examining the overall negative psychological effects experienced during this time. SSPs in various settings and regions across the U.S. experienced changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these modifications negatively impacted operations, staffing, and participant relationships. Examining the issues that individual SSPs encountered highlights opportunities for structured solutions for the present and in the case of future infectious disease outbreaks. With the severity of the opioid use crisis in the U.S. and the dependence on SSPs for its mitigation, future work in this space should be prioritized.

Beliefs and Narratives Associated with the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women

Female patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) face complicated healthcare journeys, but narrative perspectives on CPP treatment are lacking. We collected data in English and Spanish from discussion groups and individual interviews with stakeholders around female CPP. A tertiary care center for gynecologic care. Patients with CPP who self-identified as women/female, community healthcare workers, and providers who care for women with CPP. We conducted discussion groups with all 3 types of stakeholders and individual interviews with female patients who have CPP. Patient participants completed condition specific validated questionnaires. De-identified transcripts were coded with NVivo software. We contrasted patient characteristics and codes between patients with CPP who did and did not report opioid use in the last 90 days. The mean pain score of patient participants was 6/10 ± 2/10, and 14 of 47 (28%) reported recent opioid use, without significant differences between patients with and without recent opioid use. Thematic saturation was achieved. Five main themes emerged: the debilitating nature of CPP, emotional impacts of CPP, challenges in CPP healthcare interactions, treatment for CPP, and the value of not feeling alone. Common threads voiced by stakeholders included difficulty discussing chronic pain with others, a sense of inertia in treatment, interest in alternative and less invasive treatments before more involved treatments, and the need for individualized, stepwise, integrated treatment plans. Participants agreed that opioids should be used when other treatments fail, but women recently using opioids voiced fewer concerns about addiction and positive experiences with opioid efficacy. These findings among female patients with CPP and also among community healthcare workers and providers advocate for a move toward patient-centered care, particularly the acknowledgment that every woman experiences pain in a singular way. Furthermore, stakeholders voice a deep need for development of individualized treatment plans.

Opioid medication use and blood DNA methylation: epigenome-wide association meta-analysis.

Aim: To identify differential methylation related to prescribed opioid use. Methods: This study examined whether blood DNA methylation, measured using Illumina arrays, differs by recent opioid medication use in four population-based cohorts. We meta-analyzed results (282 users; 10,560 nonusers) using inverse-variance weighting. Results: Differential methylation (false discovery rate <0.05) was observed at six CpGs annotated to the following genes: KIAA0226, CPLX2, TDRP, RNF38, TTC23 and GPR179. Integrative epigenomic analyses linked implicated loci to regulatory elements in blood and/or brain. Additionally, 74 CpGs were differentially methylated in males or females. Methylation at significant CpGs correlated with gene expression in blood and/or brain. Conclusion: This study identified DNA methylation related to opioid medication use in general populations. The results could inform the development of blood methylation biomarkers of opioid use.

Rates, characteristics and toxicology of cocaine-related deaths in Australia, 2000-2021.

To (i) assess the population mortality rates of cocaine-related deaths in Australia, 2000 to 2021; (ii) determine the circumstances of death and case characteristics; and (iii) determine their toxicological profile. Retrospective study of cocaine-related deaths in Australia, 2000 to 2021, retrieved from the National Coronial Information System. Australia-wide. A total of 884 cases, mean age = 33.8 (SD, 10.0) years and 86.5% (n = 765) male. Information was collected on characteristics, manner of death and toxicology. Only cases in which the presence of blood cocaine and/or metabolites were included. Population rates did not significantly increase during 2001-2011 (annual percentage change [APC] = 1.5; CI, -3.2, 6.5), but from 2012, there was a marked acceleration (APC = 20.0, 95% CI, 15.5, 25.3). Circumstances of death were unintentional drug toxicity (70.7%, n = 625), intentional self-harm (17.8%, n = 157), traumatic accident (11.5%, n = 102). The proportion of cases constituted by unintentional toxicity declined across the study period (APC = -2.6; CI, -3.1, -2.1). There was a substantial decline in the proportion of cases with a history of injecting drug use (APC = -5.7; CI, -6.5, -4.9) and with a history of substance use problems (APC = -3.2; CI, -3.9, -2.5). Both cocaine (0.100 vs 0.050 mg/L, P < 0.001) and benzoylecgonine (0.590 vs 0.240 mg/L, P < 0.001) concentrations were higher amongst toxicity cases than in cases of death from traumatic injury. Cocaethylene was present in 26.4% (n = 233), levamisole in 18.6% (n = 164) and lignocaine in 11.5% (n = 102). Psychoactive drugs in addition to cocaine were present in 92.9% (n = 821), most commonly opioids (50.5%, n = 446), alcohol (47.1%, n = 416), hypnosedatives (43.2%, n = 382) and psychostimulants (30.3%, n = 268). There was a steady decline in the proportion of opioid positive cases (APC = -5.4; CI, -6.3, -4.5). There was a large increase in cocaine-related deaths across Australia from 2000 to 2021. This was accompanied by changes in case profiles, with histories of injecting drug use and substance use problems, as well as recent opioid use, becoming less prominent.

Health Care Resource Utilization in Management of Opioid-Naive Patients With Newly Diagnosed Neck Pain

Research has uncovered heterogeneity and inefficiencies in the management of idiopathic low back pain, but few studies have examined longitudinal care patterns following newly diagnosed neck pain. To understand health care utilization in patients with new-onset idiopathic neck pain. This cross-sectional study used nationally sourced longitudinal data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan claims database (2007-2016). Participants included adult patients with newly diagnosed neck pain, no recent opioid use, and at least 1 year of continuous postdiagnosis follow-up. Exclusion criteria included prior or concomitant diagnosis of traumatic cervical disc dislocation, vertebral fractures, myelopathy, and/or cancer. Only patients with at least 1 year of prediagnosis lookback were included. Data analysis was performed from January 2021 to January 2022. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year postdiagnosis health care expenditures, including costs, opioid use, and health care service utilization. Early services were those received within 30 days of diagnosis. Multivariable regression models and regression-adjusted statistics were used. In total, 679 030 patients (310 665 men [45.6%]) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 7858 (1.2%) underwent surgery within 1 year of diagnosis. The mean (SD) age was 44.62 (14.87) years among nonsurgical patients and 49.69 (9.53) years among surgical patients. Adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, 1-year regression-adjusted health care costs were $24 267.55 per surgical patient and $515.69 per nonsurgical patient. Across all health care services, $95 379 949 was accounted for by nonsurgical patients undergoing early imaging who did not receive any additional conservative therapy or epidural steroid injections, for a mean (SD) of $477.53 ($1375.60) per patient and median (IQR) of $120.60 ($20.70-$452.37) per patient. On average, patients not undergoing surgery, physical therapy, chiropractic manipulative therapy, or epidural steroid injection, who underwent either early advanced imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) or both early advanced and radiographic imaging, accumulated significantly elevated health care costs ($850.69 and $1181.67, respectively). Early conservative therapy was independently associated with 24.8% (95% CI, 23.5%-26.2%) lower health care costs. In this cross-sectional study, early imaging without subsequent intervention was associated with significantly increased health care spending among patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic neck pain. Early conservative therapy was associated with lower costs, even with increased frequency of therapeutic services, and may have reduced long-term care inefficiency.

Neuroimaging Findings in CHANTER Syndrome: A Case Series.

Recently, a distinct clinicoradiologic entity involving cerebellar, hippocampal, and basal nuclei transient edema with restricted diffusion (CHANTER) on MR imaging was identified. Patients present in an unresponsive state following exposure to drugs of abuse. Very little information exists regarding this entity, particularly in the radiology literature. We identify and describe 3 patients at our institution with similar clinical and radiographic findings. Multifocal restricted diffusion in the brain is typically associated with poor outcomes. By contrast, CHANTER involves intraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus that, when treated, can lead to substantial recovery. This novel syndrome should be on the differential in patients who present in an unresponsive state after recent opioid use in the context of the above imaging findings. Additional diagnoses on the differential can include ischemic stroke, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, "chasing the dragon," leukoencephalopathy, opioid-associated amnestic syndrome, and pediatric opioid-use-associated neurotoxicity with cerebellar edema.

Adult Medical Cannabinoid Use and Changes in Prescription Controlled Substance Use.

Introduction: Nonopioid-based strategies for managing chronic noncancer pain are needed to help reduce overdose deaths. Although lab studies and population-level data suggest that cannabinoids could provide opioid-sparing effects, among medical cannabis participants they may also impact overdose risk by modifying other controlled substance use such as sedative hypnotics. However, no study has combined observational data at the individual level to empirically address interactions between the use of cannabinoids and prescribed controlled substances. Methods: Electronic health records, including prescription drug monitoring program data, from a large multisite medical cannabis program in New York State were abstracted for all participants with noncancer pain and recently prescribed noncannabinoid controlled substances who completed a new intake visit from April 15, 2018-April 14, 2019 and who remained actively in treatment for >180 days. Participants were partitioned into two samples: those with recent opioid use and those with active opioid use and co-use of sedative hypnotics. A patient-month level analysis assessed total average equivalent milligrams by class of drug (i.e., cannabinoid distinguishing tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] vs. cannabidiol [CBD], opioids, and sedative-hypnotics) received as a time-varying outcome measure across each 30-day "month" period postintake for at least 6 months for all participants. Results: Sample 1 of 285 opioid users were 61.1 years of age (±13.5), 57.5% female, and using an average of 49.7 (±98.5) morphine equivalents daily at intake. Unadjusted analyses found a modest decline in morphine equivalents to 43.9 mg (±94.1 mg) from 49.7 (±98.5) in month 1 (p=0.047) while receiving relatively low doses of THC (2.93 mg/day) and CBD (2.15 mg/day). Sample 2 of 95 opioid and sedative-hypnotic users were 60.9 years of age (±13.1), 63.2% female, and using an average of 86.6 (±136.2) morphine equivalents daily, and an average of 4.3 (±5.6) lorazepam equivalents. Unadjusted analyses did not find significant changes in either morphine equivalents (p=0.81) or lorazepam equivalents (p=0.980), and patients similarly received relatively low doses of THC (2.32 mg/day) and CBD (2.24 mg/day). Conclusions: Findings demonstrated minimal to no change in either opioids or sedative hypnotics over the 6 months of medical cannabis use but may be limited by low retention rates, external generalizability, and an inability to account for nonprescribed substance use.

Multimodal Opioid-sparing Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results from a Retrospective Case Series of 40 Patients

Objective The high burden of opioids has prompted orthopedic surgeons to identify effective nonopioid pain management modalities. In this pilot retrospective case series, we describe opioid use and pain during the first 3 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for consecutive patients treated with opioid-free multimodal analgesia. Methods During May and October 2020, 40 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA performed by a single surgeon at an academic community hospital received a multimodal analgesia regimen consisting of preoperative cryoneurolysis; perioperative oral and intravenous analgesics, a neuraxial (spinal) and regional adductor canal block, and local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel); intraoperative periarticular infiltration of bupivacaine hydrochloride (Marcaine); and postoperative oral non-opioid analgesics. A Prescription Monitoring Program database was examined to capture opioid prescriptions filled during the 3 months before and after TKA. Self-reported pain was assessed before surgery and at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Results Two thirds (67.5%; 27/40) of patients recovered from TKA without using opioids. Whereas 100% of the experienced opioid users required opioids after TKA, only 15.6% of opioid-naïve patients required postoperative opioids. Opioid-experienced patients had a higher mean number of post-TKA opioid prescriptions (3.1 vs. 1.6) and total morphine milligram equivalent (985 vs. 265) than opioid-naïve patients. Patients who used opioids after TKA reported higher levels of pain at each time point than those who had opioid-free TKA. Conclusions Multimodal analgesia allows for opioid-free TKA for the majority of patients, particularly those without a history of recent opioid use.

Recovery from opioid use disorder: A 4-year post-clinical trial outcomes study

BackgroundOpioid use disorder (OUD) seriously impacts public health in the United States. However, few investigations of long-term outcomes following treatment with medication for OUD exist. Additionally, these studies have prioritized opioid use and treatment utilization outcomes, and a gap in knowledge regarding long-term, multidimensional trajectories of OUD recovery exists. This study investigated a diverse array of outcomes for individuals with OUD at an average of 4.2 years post clinical trial participation. MethodsIndividuals who previously participated in long-acting buprenorphine subcutaneous injection clinical trials (NCT023579011; NCT025100142; NCT02896296) and enrolled in The Remission from Chronic Opioid Use-Studying Environmental and SocioEconomic Factors on Recovery (RECOVER; NCT03604861) Study participated in a follow up assessment (n = 216). Substance use, psychosocial, opioid dependence, and delay discounting outcomes were assessed. Regression analyses were conducted to determine significant associations between psychosocial/opioid dependence variables and both recent opioid use and delay discounting. ResultsThe majority of participants reported abstinence from opioids since the last RECOVER study assessment (mean 2.26 years; 55%) and in the past 30 days (69%). Participants reported low levels of depression and psychological distress. Positive associations between depression and opioid craving with past 30-day opioid misuse and delay discounting, and negative associations between quality of life and treatment effectiveness with these outcomes were observed. ConclusionsThis study examined longer term OUD recovery outcomes. Participants reported high levels of abstinence from opioids and psychosocial functioning. These encouraging results highlight the multidimensional nature of recovery from OUD, and further support the effectiveness of buprenorphine as an OUD treatment.

Naloxone protection, social support, network characteristics, and overdose experiences among a cohort of people who use illicit opioids in New York City

BackgroundDespite increased availability of take-home naloxone, many people who use opioids do so in unprotected contexts, with no other person who might administer naloxone present, increasing the likelihood that an overdose will result in death. Thus, there is a social nature to being “protected” from overdose mortality, which highlights the importance of identifying background factors that promote access to protective social networks among people who use opioids.MethodsWe used respondent-driven sampling to recruit adults residing in New York City who reported recent (past 3-day) nonmedical opioid use (n = 575). Participants completed a baseline assessment that included past 30-day measures of substance use, overdose experiences, and number of “protected” opioid use events, defined as involving naloxone and the presence of another person who could administer it, as well as measures of network characteristics and social support. We used modified Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results66% of participants had ever been trained to administer naloxone, 18% had used it in the past three months, and 32% had experienced a recent overdose (past 30 days). During recent opioid use events, 64% reported never having naloxone and a person to administer present. This was more common among those: aged ≥ 50 years (PR: 1.18 (CI 1.03, 1.34); who identified as non-Hispanic Black (PR: 1.27 (CI 1.05, 1.53); experienced higher levels of stigma consciousness (PR: 1.13 (CI 1.00, 1.28); and with small social networks (< 5 persons) (APR: 1.14 (CI 0.98, 1.31). Having a recent overdose experience was associated with severe opioid use disorder (PR: 2.45 (CI 1.49, 4.04), suicidality (PR: 1.72 (CI 1.19, 2.49), depression (PR: 1.54 (CI 1.20, 1.98) and positive urinalysis result for benzodiazepines (PR: 1.56 (CI 1.23, 1.96), but not with network size.ConclusionsResults show considerable gaps in naloxone protection among people who use opioids, with more vulnerable and historically disadvantaged subpopulations less likely to be protected. Larger social networks of people who use opioids may be an important resource to curtail overdose mortality, but more effort is needed to harness the protective aspects of social networks.

Adverse childhood events and substance use history or recent opioid use among women with chronic pelvic pain

Introduction: We aimed describe the association of adverse childhood events (ACEs) with a history of substance use disorder and recent opioid use among women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Methods: This cohort study investigated two data sets of women presenting to subspecialty gynecologic and pelvic floor disorder clinics where questionnaires querying substance use disorder, opioid use in the last 3 months, and ACEs (BRFSS-ACE questionnaire) were obtained. We compared the recent opioid use, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per dose, pills used per month, and minimum MMEs reported per month between women with high (⩾4) or low (&lt;4) reported ACEs. Results: Patients completing the BRFSS-ACE ( n = 113) were older, more likely to be Hispanic/Latina, had higher levels of education, a higher prevalence of pain syndromes, and a greater degree of bother from pelvic floor disorders than those not completing the BRFSS-ACE. Women reporting a high number of (⩾4) ACEs ( n = 56) were younger, less likely to identify as Hispanic, had higher co-occurrence of fibromyalgia and IBS, and a higher prevalence of a history of substance use disorder (18% vs 2%, p &lt; 0.01) than women with low (&lt;4) ACEs ( n = 57). High ACEs were not significantly associated with recent opioid use (43% vs 39%, p = 0.83), opioid pills used per month, MMEs per dose, or the minimum MMEs used per month. Conclusion: Women with CPP reporting higher numbers of ACEs are more likely to report a history of substance use disorder but were not more likely to have used opioids in the last 3 months.

Association between depression, anxiety, chronic pain, or opioid use and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor persistence in inflammatory arthritis.

Depression, anxiety, and chronic pain are common comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and may substantially impact patient outcomes. We aimed to determine whether these comorbidities were associated with earlier TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) discontinuation. This retrospective cohort study using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database 2000-2014 identified patients with RA, PsA, and AS initiating a first TNFi. Depression/anxiety, chronic pain, and opioid use were identified using diagnosis codes and prescription fill data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to medication discontinuation in patients with or without each of these risk factors and to assess the additive effect of having multiple risk factors. Among 33,744 patients initiating a TNFi (23,888 RA, 6443 PsA, 3413 AS), depression/anxiety, chronic pain, and opioid use were common, with ≥ 1 risk factor in 48.1%, 42.5%, and 55.4% of patients with RA, PsA, and AS respectively. Each risk factor individually was associated with a 5-7-month lower median treatment persistence in each disease (all p < 0.001). Presence of multiple risk factors had an additive effect on time to discontinuation with HR (95% CI) 1.19 (1.14-1.24), 1.41 (1.33-1.49), and 1.47 (1.43-1.73) for 1, 2, or 3 risk factors respectively in RA. Findings were similar in PsA and AS. Depression, anxiety, chronic pain, and opioid use are common in inflammatory arthritis and associated with earlier TNFi discontinuation. Recognizing and managing these risk factors may improve treatment persistence, patient outcomes, and cost of care. Key Points • Depression, anxiety, chronic pain, and opioid use are common in patients with inflammatory arthritis. • In patients initiating treatment with a TNF-inhibitor, depression, anxiety, chronic pain, or recent opioid use are associated with sooner discontinuation of TNFi therapy. • Patients with multiple of these risk factors are even more likely to discontinue therapy sooner.

Startle-elicited Event-Related Potentials to Affective Stimuli are Associated with Recent Illicit Opioid use among Patients Receiving Opioid Agonist Treatment.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been linked to exaggerated attentional, affective, and arousal responses to opioid-related stimuli, as well as altered responses to other affective (eg, naturally rewarding or aversive) stimuli, particularly blunted responses to pleasant/rewarding stimuli. Both exaggerated responses to drug-related stimuli and reduced response to pleasant stimuli may influence the course of OUD and its treatment, however interpretation of studies thus far is limited by methodological issues. In the present study, we examined subjective ratings, and attenuation of the P3 component of the acoustic startle-evoked event-related potential (as a measure of attention), while viewing neutral, pleasant, unpleasant, and drug-related images. Participants prescribed opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for OUD (n = 82) were compared to a carefully-matched control group (n = 33) and to recently-abstinent participants with OUD (n = 22). Relative to controls, participants prescribed OAT gave higher positive valence ratings of drug images, and blunted valence responses to other affective images, but groups did not differ in terms of arousal ratings or P3 amplitude. Within the OAT group, linear modeling of associations between frequency of recent illicit opioid use and startle P3 amplitude found an association between increased recent illicit opioid use and reduced attention to pleasant, relative to unpleasant, images. The latter finding may have implications for interventions targeting cognitive biases in people with substance use disorder. In particular, they suggest that enhancing attention to pleasant stimuli may be as, if not more important, than the typical approach of trying to reduce attentional bias to drug-related stimuli.

Opioid-Associated Anorectal Dysfunction in Chronic Constipation.

The role of anorectal and defecatory dysfunction in opioid-related constipation is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between opioid use and rectal sensation, defecatory function, and balloon expulsion on anorectal physiology testing. This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) at a tertiary center for constipation. Clinical characteristics, medication use, and HRAM findings were obtained. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher-exact/student t-test for univariate analyses and logistic/general linear regression for multivariable analyses to compare patients with no opioid use, recent (< 3months) use, and distant (> 3months) use. 424 patients (49.8 ± 17.2years; 85.6% female) were included. Compared to those without opioid history, patients with recent use had increased volumes for first rectal sensation (70.4mL vs 59.4, p = 0.043), urge (120.5mL vs 101.5, p = 0.017), and maximal tolerance (170.2mL vs 147.2, p = 0.0018), but not patients with distant use. Recent opioid use was associated with increased risk of dyssynergic defecation (DD) (61.8% vs 46.4%, p = 0.035), but not failed balloon expulsion. On multivariable models controlling for potential confounders, recent opioid use, but not distant use, remained independently correlated with increased volumes for first rectal sensation (β-coefficient 9.78, p = 0.019), urge (β-coefficient 16.7, p = 0.0060), and maximal tolerance (β-coefficient 22.9, p = 0.0032), and higher risk for DD (aOR = 2.18, p = 0.026). Recent opioid use was an independent risk factor for rectal hyposensitivity and DD on HRAM in patients with constipation, but that effect may decrease with discontinuation of use. Anorectal physiology testing should be considered in patients with opioid-associated constipation.

Association between dynamic dose increases of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder and risk of relapse.

Dynamic, adaptive pharmacologic treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has been previously recommended over static dosing to prevent relapse, and is aligned with personalized medicine. However, there has been no quantitative evidence demonstrating its advantage. Our objective was to estimate the extent to which a hypothetical intervention that increased buprenorphine dose in response to opioid use would affect risk of relapse over 24 weeks of follow-up. A secondary analysis of the buprenorphine arm of an open-label randomized controlled 24-week comparative effectiveness trial, 2014-17. Eight community addiction treatment programs in the United States. English-speaking adults with DSM-5 OUD, recruited during inpatient admission (n = 270). Participants were mainly white (65%) and male (72%). Participants were treated with daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX), with dose based on clinical indication, determined by the provider. We examined a hypothetical intervention of increasing dose in response to opioid use. Outcome was relapse to regular opioid use during the 24 weeks of outpatient treatment, assessed in a survival framework. We estimated the relapse-free survival curves of participants under a hypothetical (i.e. counterfactual) intervention in which their BUP-NX dosage would be increased following their own subject-specific opioid use during the first 12 weeks of treatment versus a hypothetical intervention in which dose would remain constant. We estimated that increasing BUP-NX dose in response to recent opioid use would lower risk of relapse by 19.17 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) = -32.17, -6.18) (additive risk)] and 32% (0.68, 95% CI = 0.49, 0.86) (relative risk). The number-needed-to-treat with this intervention to prevent a single relapse is 6. In people with opioid use disorder, a hypothetical intervention that increases sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone dose in response to opioid use during the first 12 weeks of treatment appears to reduce risk of relapse over 24 weeks, compared with holding the dose constant after week 2.