Received Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy Research Articles

Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of prolonged cytopenia after CAR-T cell therapy in LBCL patients

Objective: To investigate the clinical features and prognosis of prolonged cytopenia (PC) in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) undergoing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted on LBCL patients who received CAR-T cell therapy with a survival time of over one month at the Hematology Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from March 2019 to December 2023. Statistical analyses were performed on hematologic changes at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-CAR-T infusion, as well as on the progression-free survival (PFS) and post-treatment adverse events, including infections. Patients were categorized into the PC and non-PC groups based on the occurrence of cytopenia at 90 days post-infusion. Differences between groups were compared, and univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. Results: The median age of 27 LBCL patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy was 58 years (range 27-69 years), with 18 males. Among the 27 LBCL patients who received CAR-T cell therapy, PC was observed in 19 patients (70.4%), with instances of neutropenia (48.1%, 13 cases), anemia (37.0%, 10 cases), and thrombocytopenia (22.2%, 6 cases). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that prior chemotherapy sensitivity (OR=18.00, 95%CI 1.56-207.45, P=0.020) and bone marrow suppression (OR=18.00, 95%CI 1.38-235.69, P=0.028) were associated with PC. The median follow-up time was 13.5 months. The PC group exhibited a higher risk of infection within 3 months (9/19 vs. 1/8) and a shorter mean PFS (19.3 months vs. 24.4 months), although the difference was not statistically significant (both P>0.05). Conclusions: PC is common following CAR-T cell therapy and is associated with an increased risk of infection and poorer prognosis. Prior treatment sensitivity and bone marrow suppression may serve as indicators of PC.

Patient-reported outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies.

The remarkable improvement in survival among individuals with hematological malignancies receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has highlighted the growing unmet need to incorporate patient-centered assessments in management guidelines for these patients. That CAR T-cell therapy is associated with unique toxicities and relatively high symptom burden in the first few weeks after cell infusion is well known. Magnifying the patient's voice by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might support personalized intervention in the acute-care setting, optimize the use of medical resources, improve satisfaction with therapy, and enhance survival benefit. However, various factors impede PRO use in routine patient care: (1) the feasibility of PRO assessment during the acute phase of treatment, especially in patients experiencing neurological toxicities, is not well established; (2) although PROs are widely used in drug- development trials, the assessment tools used in clinical trials primarily inform quality-of-life or safety comparisons among study arms and are rarely the proper tools for assessing and capturing clinically meaningful adverse events that should be monitored in routine patient care; (3) PRO data that could guide how best to monitor and capture the delayed effects of CAR T-cell therapy in long-term survivors are limited. There is a pressing need to overcome these barriers to integrating evidence-based PROs into standard-of-care guidelines for patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. In this review, we present the current state of PRO utilization in CAR T-cell therapy. We also discuss practical approaches and future directions for successful implementation of PROs in the care of patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Timeline and outcomes of viral and fungal infections after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: A large database analysis

ObjectivesThis large database analysis aims to describe the incidence, timeline, and risk factors for viral and fungal infections after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. MethodsWe queried a global research network database, TriNetX, for patients who received CAR T-cell therapy, who were identified and followed for the development of viral and fungal infections. Baseline demographic, oncologic history, laboratory data and medication histories were collected. We evaluated risk factors for respiratory viral infections (RVI), herpesvirus, fungal infections and mortality using Cox regression. ResultsA total of 2,256 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy were included, 1,867 (82.7%) were CD19-targeted and 400 (17.7%) were BCMA-targeted. Following CAR T-cell infusion, RVI were the most prevalent (23.3%) with a median onset of 160 days (IQR 52-348 days), while herpesvirus and fungal infections were less frequent, occurring in 13.6% and 11.4% of cases with median onsets of 71 (IQR 18-252) and 73 days (IQR 14-236 days), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, independent predictors of RVI included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, HR 1.61), prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT, HR 1.29), cytokine release syndrome (CRS, HR 1.41), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH, HR 1.96), and glucocorticoids (HR 3.37). Prior HCT (HR 2.00), hypogammaglobulinemia (HR 1.51), immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS, HR 1.52), and HLH (HR 1.99) were associated with a higher risk of herpesviruses. Independent predictors of fungal infections included prior HCT (HR 1.59), CRS (HR 1.58) and hypogammaglobulinemia (HR 1.40). Idecabtagene vicleucel was associated with a lower risk of herpesvirus and fungal infections (HR 0.39 and 0.44, respectively). ConclusionsIn a large cohort of CAR T-cell therapy recipients, respiratory viral infections were the most common but occurred later, while herpesvirus and fungal infections were less frequent but occurred earlier. Prospective studies investigating prophylaxis and pre-emptive monitoring strategies are needed in this population.

Abstract B105: Quality and Accessibility of Online Information Regarding CAR-T Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies have changed the treatment landscape for various hematologic malignancies and are currently under development and being tested in clinical trials for multiple solid tumors. Given that patients commonly use the internet as a source of health-related information, we sought to investigate the quality, understandability, and readability of online information regarding CAR-T therapy. Methods We conducted a search in a commonly used search engine (Google) of five pre-determined search terms to identify 100 unique web pages regarding CAR-T therapy. Scientific publications were excluded. Validated instruments were used to ascertain health information quality (DISCERN), understandability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool; PEMAT), and readability (Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG indices). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Among the 100 web pages reviewed, 68% originated from academic medical centers, and 64% included links to clinical trials. Only 11% of the web pages included references to primary literature. 17% of web pages were available in a language other than English, with Spanish (15%) and Arabic (7%) being the most common. Moderate-to-high quality information (DISCERN ≥ 3) was presented by 47% of web pages, and only 31% of web pages were considered understandable (PEMAT ≥ 70%). Average readability scores were 10.6 (SD = 2.09), 12.6 (SD = 2.3), and 13.1 (SD = 1.7) using the Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG indices, respectively. Conclusion Our study highlights that online information for CAR-T therapies commonly features low-quality health information that is typically not understandable to the general population. Further, contrary to recommendations from federal agencies and medical societies, available online information requires, on average, high school reading comprehension. Healthcare teams and stakeholders should strive to improve existing content and ensure patients have access to trusted, high-quality information given the unique complexities, processes, and toxicities associated with receiving CAR-T therapy. Citation Format: Luis C. Garcia, Ana I. Velázquez. Quality and Accessibility of Online Information Regarding CAR-T Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B105.

Procalcitonin level threshold and antibiotic use in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT Background: Patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are vulnerable to infection and sepsis. Treatment course is frequently complicated by cytokine release syndrome which is often clinically and biochemically indistinguishable from sepsis. Procalcitonin (PCT) levels have been examined as a promising biomarker for infection in this cohort of patients. Methods: In this study, we measured daily PCT levels for patients for fourteen days (or hospital discharge) after receiving CAR T-cells to determine threshold PCT values specific for infection compared to those without infection. Results: We present preliminary results of our enrolled cohort to date (sixteen patients). Infection was present in only 12.5% of patients. However, those diagnosed with sepsis had elevated PCT levels with a peak mean of 2.6 µg/L observed on the seventh day post-treatment compared to those without infection remaining below 0.5 µg/L. Furthermore, we observed a trend for early and liberal antibiotic administration within our cohort. Conclusion: Our study highlights the challenges of antimicrobial stewardship in managing CAR T-cell therapy recipients. Our preliminary results underscore the utility of PCT in the risk-stratification and diagnosis of those patients at high risk for infectious complications after receiving CAR T-cell therapy and continue to advocate for a PCT threshold of 1.5 µg/L for diagnosing sepsis. Additionally, in the setting of CRS and lymphodepletion, where white cell count and CRP value are unreliable, a PCT value of < 0.5 µg/L may help exclude sepsis.

Outpatient administration of CAR T-cell therapies using a strategy of no remote monitoring and early CRS intervention

AbstractRecent studies demonstrating the feasibility of outpatient chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T-cell therapy administration are either restricted to CARs with 41BB costimulatory domains or use intensive at-home monitoring. We report outcomes of outpatient administration of all commercially available CD19- and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed CAR T-cell therapy using a strategy of no remote at-home monitoring and an early cytokine release syndrome (CRS) intervention strategy. Patients with hematologic malignancies who received CAR T-cell therapy in the outpatient setting during 2022 to 2023 were included. Patients were seen daily in the cancer center day hospital for the first 7 to 10 days and then twice weekly through day 30. The primary end point was to determine 3-, 7-, and 30-day post–CAR T-cell infusion hospitalizations. Early CRS intervention involved administering tocilizumab as an outpatient for grade ≥1 CRS. Fifty-eight patients received outpatient CAR T-cell infusion (33 myeloma, 24 lymphoma, and 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia). Of these, 17 (41%), 16 (38%), and 9 patients (21%) were admitted between days 0 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 30 after CAR T-cell infusion, respectively. The most common reason for admission was CAR T-cell–related toxicities (33/42). Hospitalization was prevented in 15 of 35 patients who received tocilizumab for CRS as an outpatient. The nonrelapse mortality rates were 1.7% at 1 month and 3.4% at 6 months. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the administration of commercial CAR T-cell therapies in an outpatient setting is safe and feasible without intensive remote monitoring using an early CRS intervention strategy.

Epcoritamab (Epkinly)

We recommend that Epkinly be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or follicular lymphoma grade 3B after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy and who have previously received or are unable to receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for a time-limited period while additional evidence is generated if certain conditions are met. Epkinly should only be covered to treat adults who have DLBCL, not otherwise specified, DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or follicular lymphoma grade 3B that has come back or that did not respond to 2 or more previous treatments for their cancer, and who have also previously received CAR T-cell therapy, declined CAR T-cell therapy, or cannot receive CAR T-cell therapy. Epkinly should only be reimbursed if not given in combination with other anticancer drugs. Reimbursement of Epkinly should be discontinued if a patient’s cancer grows or spreads or if the treatment is unacceptably toxic to the patient. Epkinly should only be reimbursed when prescribed by specialists with experience managing large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), and if its cost is reduced.

Incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus reactivation after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

AbstractCytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major complication among seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients; however, data on CMV reactivation after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are limited. We report the incidence and outcomes of 95 adult CMV-seropositive patients who received CAR T-cell therapy between February 2018 and February 2023. CMV outcomes were CMV reactivation (any viremia) and clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMV). Thirty-one patients (33%) had evidence of CMV reactivation (any viremia), and 10 patients (11%) had cs-CMV. The median time from CAR T-cell infusion to CMV reactivation was 19 days (interquartile range [IQR], 9-31). The cumulative incidence of CMV (any viremia) was significantly higher among patients with grade 3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome (67 vs 28%; P = .01), and those who received corticosteroids (39 vs 21%; P = .03), anakinra (56 vs 28%; P = .02), or ≥2 immunosuppressants (41 vs 21%; P = .02). Receipt of corticosteroids (18 vs 0%; P = .004), tocilizumab (14 vs 0%; P = .04), anakinra (33 vs 7%; P = .008), and ≥2 immunosuppressants (20 vs 0%; P = .001) were all associated with cs-CMV. Receiving ≥2 immunosuppressants was associated with a twofold increase in CMV reactivation in multivariate analyses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.8; P = .03). Overall, the 1-year mortality was significantly higher in those with CMV reactivation (57% vs 23%; P = .001). Immunosuppression, particularly with corticosteroids, for the management of CAR T-cell toxicities, is a major risk factor for CMV reactivation.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

Patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma receiving CAR T-cell therapy have a low rate of severe infections despite lack of universal antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis.

Our aim was to describe the frequency and severity of infectious complications after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of LBCL patients treated with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy from July/2018 to December/2021 at our institution, and identified all infectious episodes from CAR T-cell infusion until disease progression, death or last follow-up. Overall, 137 patients were included. Thirty six percent had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy and 26% an autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 87 (64%) patients. Antibacterial prophylaxis was not used in any patient; only 38% received antifungal prophylaxis. Sixty three infectious events were observed in 41 (30%) patients. Fifty two (83%) of the infectious events had at least one pathogen identified (bacteria [n = 38], virus [n = 11], and fungi [n = 3]). Most of the infectious events occurred during hospitalization for CAR-T treatment. Infection-related mortality was observed in two patients. Independent risk factors for infection included male gender, previous auto-HCT, ≥3 lines of treatment and pre-lymphodepletion neutropenia. Infections after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with lymphoma are frequent but generally not severe. A conservative and tailored antimicrobial prophylaxis seems to be a safe approach.

Clinical efficacy and safety of blinatumomab bridging CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of patients with adult acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia

Objective: Exploring the efficacy and safety of bridging blinatumomab (BiTE) in combination with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy for the treatment of adult patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) . Methods: Clinical data from 36 adult B-ALL patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University from August 2018 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 36 cases were included: 18 men and 18 women. The median age was 43.5 years (21-72 years). Moreover, 21 cases of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were reported, and 16 of these cases were relapsed or refractory. Eighteen patients underwent blinatumomab bridging followed by CAR-T cell therapy, and 18 patients received CAR-T cell therapy. This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of treatment in two groups of patients. Results: In the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group, 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after BiTE immunotherapy, with a CR rate of 88.9%. One month after bridging CAR-T therapy, bone marrow examination showed a CR rate of 100.0%, and the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate was higher than the nonbridging therapy group (94.4% vs. 61.1%, Fisher, P=0.041). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was lower than that in the nonbridging therapy group (11.1% vs. 50.0%, Fisher, P=0.027). The follow-up reveals that 13 patients continued to maintain MRD negativity, and five patients experienced relapse 8.40 months (2.57-10.20 months) after treatment. Two of five patients with relapse achieved CR after receiving the second CAR-T cell therapy. In the nonbridging therapy group, 10 patients maintained continuous MRD negativity, 7 experienced relapse, and 6 died. The 1 year overall survival rate in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was higher than that in the nonbridging therapy group, with a statistically significant difference at the 0.1 level (88.9%±10.5% vs. 66.7%±10.9%, P=0.091) . Conclusion: BiTE bridging CAR-T cell therapy demonstrates excellent efficacy in adult B-ALL treatment, with a low recent recurrence rate and ongoing assessment of long-term efficacy during follow-up.

18F]FDG PET/CT for prognosis and toxicity prediction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been confirmed to benefit patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). It is important to provide precise and timely predictions of the efficacy and toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy. In this study, we evaluated the value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) combining with clinical indices and laboratory indicators in predicting outcomes and toxicity of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for DLBCL patients. Thirty-eight DLBCL patients who received CAR T-cell therapy and underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT within 3 months before (pre-infusion) and 1 month after CAR T-cell infusion (M1) were retrospectively reviewed and regularly followed up. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), clinical indices, and laboratory indicators were recorded at pre-infusion and M1 time points, and changes in these indices were calculated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were as endpoints. Based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis, two predictive models for PFS and OS were developed and evaluated the efficiency. Pre-infusion indices were subjected to predict the grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) resulting from toxic reactions. For survival analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.2 months, patients with values of international prognostic index (IPI), SUVmax at M1, and TLG at M1 above their optimal thresholds had a shorter PFS (median PFS: 8.1 months [IPI ≥ 2] vs. 26.2 months [IPI < 2], P = 0.025; 3.1 months [SUVmax ≥ 5.69] vs. 26.8 months [SUVmax < 5.69], P < 0.001; and 3.1 months [TLG ≥ 23.79] vs. 26.8 months [TLG < 23.79], P < 0.001). In addition, patients with values of SUVmax at M1 and ∆SUVmax% above their optimal thresholds had a shorter OS (median OS: 12.6 months [SUVmax ≥ 15.93] vs. 'not reached' [SUVmax < 15.93], P < 0.001; 32.5 months [∆SUVmax% ≥ -46.76] vs. 'not reached' [∆SUVmax% < -46.76], P = 0.012). Two novel predictive models for PFS and OS were visualized using nomogram. The calibration analysis and the decision curves demonstrated good performance of the models. Spearman's rank correlation (rs) analysis revealed that the CRS grade correlated strongly with the pre-infusion SUVmax (rs = 0.806, P < 0.001) and moderately with the pre-infusion TLG (rs = 0.534, P < 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the pre-infusion value of SUVmax correlated with the risk of developing a higher grade of CRS (P < 0.001). In this group of DLBCL patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy, SUVmax at M1, TLG at M1, and IPI were independent risk factors for PFS, and SUVmax at M1 and ∆SUVmax% for OS. Based on these indicators, two novel predictive models were established and verified the efficiency for evaluating PFS and OS. Moreover, pre-infusion SUVmax correlated with the severity of any subsequent CRS. We conclude that metabolic parameters measured using [18F]FDG PET/CT can identify DLBCL patients who will benefit most from CAR T-cell therapy, and the value before CAR T-cell infusion may predict its toxicity in advance.

Transient acute kidney injury after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 30% of patients infused with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and long-term outcomes after AKI in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy. Medical records of 115 adult patients with R/R hematological malignancies treated with CD19-targeted CAR T-cells at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital between July 2018 and May 2021. Baseline demographic data including age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities, as well as the type of hematological neoplasia and prior lines of therapy were collected. Laboratory parameters including serum creatinine and whole blood hemoglobin were retrospectively reviewed and values were gathered for days +1, +7, +14, +21, and +28 post-infusion. A total of 24/115 (21%) patients developed AKI related to CAR T-cell therapy; 6/24 with AKI over chronic kidney disease (CKD). Two patients had AKI in the context of lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy and the other 22 after CAR T-cell infusion, starting at day+1 in 3 patients, day+7 in 13 patients, day +14 in 1 patient, day+21 in 2 patients, and day+28 in 3 patients. Renal function was recovered in 19/24 (79%) patients within the first month after infusion. Male gender, CKD, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were associated with AKI. Male gender, CKD, ICANS grade ≥3 and CRS grade ≥2 were identified as independent risk factors for AKI on multivariable analysis. In terms of the most frequent CAR T-cell related complications, CRS was observed in 95 (82%) patients and ICANS in 33 (29%) patients. Steroids were required in 34 (30%) patients and tocilizumab in 37 (32%) patients. Six (5%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (1 for septic shock, 4 for CRS grade ≥2 associated to ICANS grade ≥2, and 1 for CRS grade ≥3). A total of 5 (4.4%) patients died in the first 30 days after CAR T-cell infusion for reasons other than disease progression, including 4 cases of infectious complications and 1 of heart failure. Our results suggest that AKI is a frequent but mild adverse event, with fast recovery in most patients.

Experiences and perspectives on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy among recipients, carers and referrers (RE-TELL): a qualitative study to inform CAR T-cell service design

ObjectivesRE-TELL is a qualitative study, which aims to understand patient, support person, clinician and coordinator experiences and perspectives of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, to inform design of a...

Simple Score of Albumin and CRP Predicts High-Grade Toxicity in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving CAR-T Therapy

Administration of chimeric-antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is complex and associated with unique toxicities. Identifying patients at risk for inferior outcomes is important for individualized management. The Glasgow-prognostic score (GPS) is a simple score shown to be highly prognostic of outcomes in the setting of traditional chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibitor administration. We sought to evaluate the value of the GPS to predict outcomes of patients with relapse refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy. We included all patients treated with commercial CAR-T therapy for RRMM between 5/1/2021 and 2/1/2023 at the Moffitt Cancer Center. The GPS (CRP >1 mg/dL, 1 point; albumin <3.5, 1 point) was calculated for all patients at lymphodepletion (day -6) and patients were grouped as high-risk GPS (score = 2) or low-risk GPS (0 or 1). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at day 100. A total of 139 pts were included, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.9 months). Pts were treated with either idecabtagene vicleucel (83%) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (17%). In total, 14% were classified with high-risk GPS, with significantly increased risk for grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (P = .003) and ICANS of any grade (P < .001). Patients in the high-risk GPS group had significantly lower day-100 OS (68.4% versus 97.3%, P < .001), OS at 6 months (56% versus 91.8% P = .0019) and PFS at 6 months (38.3% versus 72.3%, P = .03). The association of GPS with day-100 OS remained significant in a multivariable model. In conclusion, the GPS identifies a group of high-risk patients with RRMM receiving CAR-T therapy who experience increased rates of immune-mediated toxicity and are at higher risk for early mortality.

Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in patients with post-CAR T cytopenias.

While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment outcomes of relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies, this therapy is associated with post-treatment cytopenias, which can pose a challenge to its safe administration. This study describes the management of post-CAR T cytopenias using the thrombopoietin mimetic eltrombopag. This retrospective analysis included adult patients with lymphoma or myeloma who received CAR T-cell therapy at two academic medical centers. Eltrombopag was initiated for patients who had persistent high-grade leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia beyond 21 days post-CAR T infusion. Risk factors and outcomes were assessed and compared for patients who did or did not receive eltrombopag. Among the 185 patients analyzed, a majority (88%) experienced thrombocytopenia or leukopenia at day +30 post-CAR T infusion. A total of 42 patients met the criteria for eltrombopag treatment and initiated therapy. Patients who received eltrombopag were more likely to have pre-existing cytopenias at lymphodepletion, receive bridging therapy, experience an infection, or require intensive care. Recovery from cytopenias occurred within 180 days for a majority (94%) of patients. The use of eltrombopag for post-CAR T leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was considered safe without any significant toxicities. The use of eltrombopag for post-CAR T cytopenias might be effective in a high-risk patient population but requires further study.

Early Prediction of Treatment Response By Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy

Introduction Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) are characterized by a particularly poor prognosis. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has improved outcomes of patients with r/r DLBCL, yet a substantial proportion of patients still experiences relapse or progression after CAR T-cell treatment. Identifying patients at high risk of CAR T-cell therapy resistance or future lymphoma progression remains challenging. Here, we explored the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker at baseline and early into treatment in DLBCL patients undergoing standard-of-care CAR T-cell therapy, without the need for matched tumor genotypes. We further investigated associations between ctDNA and other known clinical risk factors. Methods We applied targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to a total of 53 samples from r/r DLBCL patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel, n=16) at the University Medical Center Freiburg (Germany), using a modified version of the AVENIO ctDNA analysis workflow (Roche; Research Use Only) that covered ~314kb and targeted 466 distinct genes recurrently mutated in DLBCL (based on the CAPP-Seq workflow, Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol 2018). Tumor genotypes were assessed noninvasively from plasma samples obtained at baseline before lymphodepletion with matched germline controls. Concentrations of ctDNA were quantified at baseline and early after CAR T-cell therapy at day 7-10. Initial treatment response was assessed by conventional PET-CT obtained 4-6 weeks after treatment based on the Lugano criteria. Results At baseline prior to lymphodepletion, we detected somatic mutations in 100% of plasma samples by noninvasive genotyping, with a median of 19.5 mutations per patient (range: 3-97). The most frequently mutated genes were IGHV, IGLL5, BCL2, MYC, BTG1, CREBBP, and TP53. Patients with high baseline ctDNA concentrations (mean allele frequency [AF] &amp;gt;= 1%) showed shorter progression-free survivial (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with ctDNA levels below this threshold (median PFS: 86.5 days vs. not reached, p=0.04, HR: 6.3, 95% CI: 1.7-23.6; median OS: 219 days vs. not reached, p=0.048, HR: 4.1, 95% CI 1.0-16.6, Figure 1). Pretreatment ctDNA levels were significantly correlated with LDH concentrations ( p=0.049, r=0.5). We further found significantly higher ctDNA concentrations in patients with transformed DLBCL (vs. non-transformed, p=0.008) and in those with 3 or more prior treatment lines (vs. 1-2, p=0.04). At day 7-10 after CAR T-cell therapy, ctDNA levels dropped a median of 10-fold compared to the pretreatment time point ( p=0.008). Patients achieving a complete (CMR) or partial metabolic response (PMR) by PET-CT after 4-6 weeks showed a significant decrease of ctDNA ( p=0.001), while those with a stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) had no significant ctDNA reduction at day 7-10 after CAR T-cell infusion. Vice versa, while 100% of patients with a &amp;gt;1.5-log-fold drop of ctDNA level between the pretreatment and interim time point revealed a CMR or PMR in early PET-CT scans, only 62% of patients with a smaller ctDNA decline responded to treatment according to PET-CT. Conclusions Our data suggests, together with previously published studies (Sworder BJ et al., Cancer Cell, 2023; Frank MJ et al. J Clin Oncol, 2021), that ctDNA profiling may allow robust noninvasive genotyping, accurate risk-stratification, and early prediction of clinical outcomes in r/r DLBCL patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. Although limited by small sample size, this pilot study highlights a potential future role of ctDNA measurements for personalized treatment selection and guidance in clinical trials.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study

Background: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is a standard of care in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, it remains underutilized in elderly pts due to limited efficacy and safety data. We therefore evaluated real world outcomes of CART in such pts. Methods: Seven academic centers participated in this retrospective study. Pts aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL who received a commercial CART product were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment data, CART toxicity, and clinical outcomes were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS; time from infusion to disease progression or death) and overall survival (OS; time from infusion to death from any cause) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and disease relapse/progression were estimated accounting for competing risks. Statistical analyses were performed in JMP v15 and XLSTAT v2022.1.2. Results: 209 pts were identified. Baseline characteristics and treatment pattern are shown in Table. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89), and 25 (12%) were ≥80 years. 131 (63%) were male, 188 (90%) were white, and 27 (13%) had ECOG PS of ≥2. The median HCT-CI was 1 (range 0-6), and 39 (22%) pts had a score of ≥3. 165 (84%) had stage III-IV disease, 131 (70%) had extranodal involvement, 24 (18%) had bulky disease, and 24 (11%) had high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL; double- or triple-hit lymphoma, n=15; HGBL, NOS, n=9). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-8), and 99 (48%) pts had ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 45 (22%) had prior bendamustine, and 44 (21%) had prior stem cell transplant (SCT; auto-SCT, n=41; allo-SCT, n=2; both auto- and allo-SCT, n=1). Bridging therapy was given to 100 (52%) pts; among those, 57 had chemotherapy, 20 had radiotherapy, 6 had both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 10 had lenalidomide-based regimen, and 7 had CD20 antibody and/or corticosteroids. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was most frequently used (63%, n=131), followed by lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) (24%, n=49) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) (13%, n=27). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 75% of pts, and a minority (6%) had grade ≥3. Immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 55%, and 29% had grade ≥3. The management of CRS and ICANS included corticosteroids in 101 (49%) pts, tocilizumab in 116 (56%) pts, and other biologic agents (anakinra, siltuximab, basiliximab) in 8 (4%) pts. Day 30 response was evaluable in 195 pts with an objective response rate (ORR) of 84%, and a complete response rate (CR) of 52%. 82% of the responders continued to have a response at 3 month follow up. The ORR/CR rates were 86%/53% for axi-cel, 64%/44% for tisa-cel, and 89%/52% for liso-cel, respectively. At a median follow up of 19.1 months (95% CI 16.1-23.6) after infusion, the median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-11.5), with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 54% (95% CI 47-61) and 43% (95% CI 35-50), respectively. The median OS was 16.5 months (95% CI 13.2-26.7), and the 6-and 12-month OS rates were 70% (95% CI 64-77) and 61% (95% CI 54-68), respectively. The NRM rate was 17% (95% CI 11-24) at 1 year, primarily due to infections including 5 COVID-19 related deaths. In univariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥2, bulky disease, elevated LDH, and the need for bridging therapy were associated with inferior PFS and OS. No significant difference in PFS and OS was seen based on age at infusion with a median PFS of 6.4 vs 9.6 vs 6.4 vs 6.0 months ( P=0.93) (Figure) and OS of 16.4 vs 19.2 vs 28.5 vs 12.7 months ( P=0.85) in age groups ≥65-69 vs ≥70-74 vs ≥75-79 vs ≥80-89. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS based on type of CART with a median PFS of 6.4 vs 5.6 vs 12.7 months ( P=0.16) and OS of 15.1 vs vs 16.1 vs NR months ( P=0.24) in pts treated with axi-cel vs tisa-cel vs liso-cel. Conclusions: In this large multicenter study of elderly pts with RR LBCL, CART therapy demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profile comparable to that in pivotal registration trials. Survival outcomes appeared similar regardless of patient age, including those aged ≥80 years, and type of CART product used. Similar to younger pts, high tumor burden and poor performance status at CART infusion were associated with inferior survival. This analysis confirms that older pts should not be excluded from receiving CART therapy solely due to chronological age.

BCMA-Directed CAR-T Cell Therapy Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a rapidly evolving immunotherapy for hematological malignancies. With increasing access to this modality, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive understanding of infectious complications to optimize prophylaxis and improve clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence and characteristics of infectious complications in adult patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Methods: The study was registered on PROSPERO and we searched 5 electronic databases from inception to 2022. Each author independently screened titles, reviewed full texts to identify eligible studies and extracted data from included studies using Covidence, a data extraction tool for conduction of standard systematic reviews. A random effects model was used, and proportions were used as a measure of outcome. We assessed heterogeneity using I^2 statistic. Risk of bias assessments were conducted using the RoB 2.0 for RCTs and ROBINS I tool for non-RCTs. Results: Our search identified 12,441 studies of which 363 underwent full-text review (Figure 1). 33 studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis and enrolled a total of 2866 patients. The pooled incidence of an infectious event in adult patients after CAR T-cell therapy was 38% (95%CI 0.31, 0.46; p&amp;lt;0.01; I2 = 98%]. No significant difference was noted in the incidence among studies with a longer follow up duration compared to studies with follow up of £ 30 days [40% (95% CI 0.30-0.50) vs 32% (95% CI 0.24-0.40), p=0.20 respectively]. BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapies used for management of multiple myeloma had a significantly higher incidence of infectious complications compared to CD19 targeted agents, 64% (95% CI 0.53-0.74, I2 = 65%) versus 39% (95% CI 0.30-0.49; I2 = 98%; p &amp;lt;0.01) respectively, Figure 2. Clostridium difficile and Escherichia coli were the most common pathogens causing bacterial infections, while cytomegalovirus was the most commonly identified viral pathogen affecting these patients. Conclusion: In this study, BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapies were associated with a significantly higher risk of infectious complications. The results of this study can guide the development of strategies to prevent and manage infectious complications in this patient population.

Advancing Collaboration across the Multiple Myeloma Treatment Journey from Oncology Clinic to CAR T-Cell Center: A Paired Center Transformative Quality Improvement Initiative

Background Treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is a complex endeavor that requires effective clinical decision-making from a team of specialists and supporting clinicians. Additionally, treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy presents unique challenges, requiring communication and collaboration between the oncology clinic and CAR T-cell treatment centers. To improve collaborative MM care, we conducted a quality improvement (QI) study, bringing together community and academic oncology centers to assess current practice patterns and develop strategies to overcome barriers in the treatment of patients with MM across the continuum of care. Methods This QI initiative is comprised of baseline provider surveys (Community n = 21; Academic n = 18) and pre- and post-surveys of providers (n = 31) participating in small-group, team-based audit-feedback (AF) sessions (Table 1). Survey questions were designed to assess knowledge, confidence, and experiences in keeping up with the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations and collaboration and communication practices between centers. Care teams from each clinic, along with a nationally renowned expert MM physician, participated in audit and feedback sessions to (a) assess system-specific practice gaps identified via the provider surveys, (b) prioritize areas for improvement, and (c) develop action plans for addressing root causes. Results Provider Surveys: When asked their top challenge encountered in managing patients with MM, community-based providers reported keeping up with clinical evidence for new and emerging therapies (48%), whereas academic-based providers reported knowing how to optimally sequence therapies (50%). Further differences between community and academic clinicians were evident in their self-reported confidence in their ability to stay up-to-date with new data on CAR T-cell therapies and other MM treatment (high/very high confidence: 84% academic; 24% community; p &amp;lt; .001), ability to align clinical practices with evidence-based guidelines (high/very high confidence: 72% academic; 34% community; p = .018), and ability to sequence lines of therapy and differentiate between novel therapies for MM (high/very high confidence: 72% academic; 29% community; p = .007). Despite these differences, care teams from both settings reported low percentages of eligible patients have received CAR T-cell therapy for MM, citing patient resistance, cost and difficulty gaining insurance approval as top barriers (Figure 1). When asked to rate the level of communication and collaboration between academic and community centers, 44% of academic providers and 35% of community providers rated very good/excellent. The top barrier among providers not indicating very good/excellent communication from both settings was lack of time for our clinic's staff to communicate. AF Sessions: Providers participating in the small group AF sessions reported gaining access to newer therapies (55%) as their biggest challenge regarding MM management. Clinicians indicated gains in moderate/high/very high confidence in their ability to align treatment decisions with guidelines and clinical evidence for MM (78% to 92%) and ability to sequence treatment options across multiple lines of therapy for patients with MM (80% to 100%). Care teams set goals to enhance knowledge of clinical efficacy and safety of new and emerging therapies for MM. Action plans to achieve these goals include developing a hematology disease specific tumor board to collaborate on patient care plans, further train designated staff members focused on CAR T-cell/MM, discuss relevant new data to improve the team's confidence in therapy sequencing and early referrals to CAR T-cell centers. Conclusions Through this QI initiative, clinical teams identified barriers to optimal MM care, creating and implementing specific action plans to increase knowledge of current and emerging therapies for MM to enhance individualized treatment plans. While meaningful confidence gains were demonstrated, these data underscore clinical practice gaps to address in future initiatives to support evidence-based, collaborative care plans for patients with MM. Study Sponsor Statement The study reported in this abstract was funded by educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb. The grantors had no role in the study design, execution, analysis, or reporting.