Receipt Of Guideline-concordant Care Research Articles

Racial and elderly disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care in stage I-III breast cancer.

e13688 Background: Elderly and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients have worse breast cancer specific survival outcomes. We evaluated whether guideline concordant care (GCC) and all-cause mortality in stage I-III breast cancer differed by race among patients ≥ 65 years old. Methods: We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB), to identify a cohort of 25174 NHB and 233357 non-Hispanic White patients (NHW), ≥65 years old, diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2010 and 2019. We used the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to define GCC, including surgery, radiation and systemic therapy. Specific systemic therapies and cause of death were unavailable. We used logistic regression models to assess the association between race and GCC. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations between race and all-cause mortality after adjusting for GCC. Both models adjusted for disease, demographics, income and educational attainment. We assessed the odds of not receiving timely GCC within 30, 60 and 90 days from diagnosis for NHB vs. NHW patients using logistic regression. Results: Overall, 15% of patients did not receive GCC. Being NHB compared to NHW was associated with increased odds of not receiving GCC in univariate (OR=1.24 95%CI: 1.20-1.28) and multivariate analysis (aOR=1.13, 95%CI: 1.08-1.17). Being NHB was associated with 26% increased risk of all-cause mortality in the univariate analysis (HR=1.26, p<0.001), which decreased to 4% increased risk, after adjusting for GCC, age, clinical and sociodemographic factors (aHR=1.04, p=0.027). Non-receipt of GCC (aHR=1.75, p<0.001) and lower educational attainment (aHR 1.18, p <0.001) were independently associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality. Higher median income (aHR 0.91, p<0.001) was independently associated with a decreased risk of mortality. Being NHW compared to NHB was associated with increased odds of initiating treatment within 30 (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.6-1.69), 60 (OR=2.11, 95% CI 2.04-2.18), and 90 days of breast cancer diagnosis (OR=2.39, 95% CI 2.27-2.51). Conclusions: Among elderly patients with stage I-III BC, being NHB was associated with increased odds of not receiving GCC and less timely treatment initiation. Being NHB was associated with increased all-cause mortality, which was attenuated after adjusting for GCC. Optimizing timely receipt of GCC may reduce inferior survival outcomes among elderly NHB breast cancer patients. Identifying area-level determinants may help design targeted interventions. Limitations include lack of granular systemic therapy data, likely overestimating GCC receipt, biasing the analysis towards the null, and lack of cause-specific death among elderly patients with competing risks of death.

Abstract PS18-07: Trends in Guideline Concordant Care for Inflammatory Breast Cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

Abstract Background: Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with worse survival outcomes compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Black patients with IBC have worse survival outcomes than White patients. Trimodality treatment (TMT) which includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by modified radical mastectomy without immediate reconstruction (MRM), and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), has been associated with improved survival outcomes for patients with IBC. Whether receipt of TMT varies by race, ethnicity, and insurance status and its impact on survival is largely unknown. Methods: Adult female patients with non-metastatic IBC treated from 2010-2018 were identified from the NCDB. Guideline concordant care (GCC) was defined as TMT administered in the correct sequence. In addition, clinical tumor/nodal stage, age, race, ethnicity, facility type, patient location, insurance status, and pathologic complete response (pCR) were examined for each patient. Additional quality metrics of GCC examined included time to initiation of NACT < 60 days (TTNC) and proper surgical care defined as complete axillary lymph node dissection (>6 lymph nodes removed) at the time of MRM without reconstruction. Univariate and multivariate mixed methods were performed to determine association between patient, treatment, and facility-level factors and receipt of GCC, TTNC < 60 days, and proper surgical care. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare groups. Results: 7,374 women with non-metastatic IBC were included. 78% were White, 17% Black, and 2.5% Asian/Pacific Islander patients; 7.7% identified as Hispanic and 92% as non-Hispanic. The majority had private insurance (51%), 29% Medicare, 14% Medicaid, 4.9% uninsured, and 1.3% other government insurance.Only 2,418 patients (32.7%) received GCC with only 29% undergoing MRM without reconstruction.Receipt of GCC was more common among patients age >50 years, patients with higher clinical nodal burden and those treated from 2010-2013 (p=0.001).Receipt of GCC did not differ by race, ethnicity, insurance status, or location.92% (6,005/7,374 patients) received NAC within 60 days of diagnosis. Both Black (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74, p= < 0.001) and Asian (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90, p= < 0.001) patients with IBC were less likely to have TTNC < 60 days when compared to White patients. Non-Hispanic patients (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.65-3.03, p= < 0.001) and those with private insurance (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.23-2.68, p= < 0.001) were more likely to have TTNC within 60 days of diagnosis. Patients with lower clinical nodal burden(cN0) were less likely to undergo proper surgery compared to patients with higher nodal burden(cN1-3) (p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated in a more contemporary cohort (2014-2018) were less likely to undergo proper surgery compared to patients treated earlier (2010-2013) (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92, p< 0.001).Among IBC patients receiving GCC, Black patients had significantly worse overall survival compared to White patients (p < 0.001) Conclusions: The majority of patients with IBC do not receive GCC and GCC has decreased since 2014 with fewer patients undergoing appropriate surgical treatment. The very low level of GCC indicates a need for multidisciplinary education, while improvement in TTNC may improve outcomes among racial/ethnic minorities. Citation Format: Brian Diskin, Audree Tadros, Varadan Sevilimedu, Amy Xu, Perri Vingan, Jonas Nelson, Yoshiko Iwai, Monica Morrow, Oluwadamilola (Lola) Fayanju. Trends in Guideline Concordant Care for Inflammatory Breast Cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS18-07.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative and Her2 +ve breast cancer: striving for the standard of care.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative (TN) and Her2-positive (HER2) breast cancers is supported by international guidelines as it can decrease extent of surgery, provide prognostic information, and allow response-driven adjuvant therapies. Our goal was to describe practice patterns for patients with TN and HER2-positive breast cancer and identify the factors associated with the receipt of NAC versus surgery as initial treatment. A retrospective population-based cohort study of adult women diagnosed with stage I-III TN or HER2-positive breast cancer (2012-2020) in Ontario was completed using linked administrative datasets. The primary outcome was NAC as first treatment. The association between NAC and patient, tumor, and practice-related factors was examined using multivariable logistic regression models. Of 14,653 patients included, 23.9% (n = 3500) underwent NAC as first treatment. Patients who underwent NAC were more likely to be younger and have larger tumors, node-positive disease, and stage 3 disease. Of patients who underwent surgery first, 8.8% were seen by a medical oncologist prior to surgery. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size (T2 vs T1/T0: 2.75 (2.31-3.28)) and node-positive (N1 vs N0: OR 3.54 (2.92-4.30)) disease were both associated increased odds of receiving NAC. A considerable proportion of patients with TN and HER2-positive breast cancer do not receive NAC as first treatment. Of those, most were not assessed by both a surgeon and medical oncologist prior to initiating therapy. This points toward potential gaps in multidisciplinary assessment and disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care.

Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Osteosarcoma in California: A Population-Based Analysis.

To examine the relationship between guideline-concordant care (GCC) on the basis of national clinical practice guidelines and survival in children (0-14 years), adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years), and adults (40 years and older) with osteosarcoma, and to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of GCC and survival. We used data from the California Cancer Registry (CCR) on patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma during 2004-2019, with detailed treatment information extracted from the CCR text fields, including chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used for statistical analyses. Of 1,716 patients, only 47% received GCC, with variation by age at diagnosis: 67% of children, 43% of AYAs, and 30% of adults. In multivariable models, patients who received part or all care (v none) at specialized cancer centers were more likely to receive GCC. AYAs and adults were less likely to receive GCC than children (odds ratio [OR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50] and OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.56], respectively). In a model excluding adults, patients treated by pediatric (v medical) oncologists were more likely to receive GCC (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 2.40 to 4.94]). Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis who did not receive GCC had a greater hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.55 to 2.63]) but no statistical differences were found in those diagnosed at earlier stages (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.43]). GCC was associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma in California. However, we found disparities in the delivery of GCC, highlighting the need for target interventions to improve delivery of GCC in this patient population.

Association of Historical Housing Discrimination and Colon Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in the United States.

In the 1930s, the federally sponsored Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition in its assessment of areas worthy of receiving loans. Neighborhoods with large proportions of Black residents were mapped in red (ie, redlining) and flagged as hazardous for mortgage financing. Redlining created a platform for systemic disinvestment in these neighborhoods, leading to barriers in access to resources that persist today. We investigated the association between residing in areas with different HOLC ratings and receipt of quality cancer care and outcomes among individuals diagnosed with colon cancer-a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment. Individuals who resided in zip code tabulation areas in 196 cities with HOLC rating and were diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database and assigned a HOLC grade (A, best; B, still desirable; C, definitely declining; and D, hazardous and mapped in red). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated association of area-level HOLC grade and late stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method evaluated differences in time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models investigated differences in overall survival (OS). There were 149,917 patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer with a median age of 68 years. Compared with people living in HOLC A areas, people living in HOLC D areas were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12]). In addition, people living in HOLC B, C, and D areas had 8%, 16%, and 24% higher odds of not receiving guideline-concordant care, including lower receipt of surgery, evaluation of ≥12 lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. People residing in HOLC B, C, or D areas also experienced delays in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. People residing in HOLC C (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.13]) and D (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.18]) areas had worse OS, including 13% and 20% excess risk of death for individuals diagnosed with early- and 6% and 8% for late-stage disease for HOLC C and D, respectively. Historical housing discrimination is associated with worse contemporary access to colon cancer care and outcomes.

Abstract B007: Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of guideline concordant care among ovarian cancer patients

Abstract Background: Black women experience the worst survival after an ovarian cancer diagnosis, compared to any racial and ethnic group, and the mortality gap between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women has continued to widen over the years. Standard of care for ovarian cancer has historically included surgical cytoreduction followed by platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy, with some minor variations over the years in the recommendations for agents, dosing patterns, and treatment sequence, which may affect disparities in adherence to treatment guidelines. The most drastic changes in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were released in 2016, with the incorporation of histotype in decision trees to guide care. Our study aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in receipt of guideline concordant care in an integrated health system. Methods: This analysis included 4,197 California residents in the KP ROCS (Kaiser Permanente Research on Ovarian Cancer Survival) Study, age 18 years or older when diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 with invasive ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and with available key information to assess guideline concordant care. Detailed surgery and chemotherapy data, as well as clinical characteristics (e.g., grade, stage, histotype), were obtained from electronic medical records. We evaluated concordance with year-specific NCCN guidelines for surgery and chemotherapy according to the year of diagnosis, with independent consideration of recommendations for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Results: Our study included 2,822 NHW women, 231 NHB women, 558 Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) women, 512 Hispanic women, and 74 women of other races. Overall, we found that NHB women were less likely to receive guideline concordant care than any other groups (37.2% compared to 44.6% for NHW, 55.4% for NHA, and 48.6% for Hispanic women). NHB women were less like to receive surgery, and guideline concordant chemotherapy, including having early discontinuation. Annual trends also revealed persistently lower receipt of guideline treatment among NHB compared with all other groups over time. We also observed for all groups, except AAPI women a lower percentage of concordant care after 2016, most pronounced for NHB women, at 33%, when histotype was incorporated into NCCN guidelines. Conclusions: We found that in a setting with similar insurance coverage, treatment disparities persisted. Our next step will be to further explore the reasons for these treatment differences, including neighborhood context and geographic medical accessibility, as well as other patient characteristics (e.g., comorbidity burden, biological factors), that may also have an impact in disease progression and mortality outcomes. Citation Format: Elisa V. Bandera, Lindsay J. Collin, Valerie Lee, Juraj Kavecansky, Christine Garcia, Carola Sanchez Diaz, Farzin Khosrow-Khavar, Jennifer A. Doherty, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Lawrence H. Kushi. Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of guideline concordant care among ovarian cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B007.

Abstract B106: Assessing racial disparities in the receipt of quality care in the most prevalent cancers in American Indians

Abstract INTRODUCTION Previous SEER-Medicare analyses reported lower receipt of guideline concordant care for American Indian (AI) compared with White (WH) patients across several cancers. While large scale assessments are informative, there is a need to assess cancer outcomes and develop interventions at a level closer to communities. To address this gap, we assessed measures of quality care in AI and WH breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. METHODS We assembled novel cohorts of AI and WH patients from the North Carolina (NC) cancer registry, the state with the largest AI population east of the Mississippi River. Eligible patients were diagnosed with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers who linked to public and private insurance claims with continuous enrollment (2003-2019). Measures were assessed within 1 year of diagnosis unless stated otherwise. Breast cancer measures included receipt of: (1) HER2 testing within 3 months of diagnosis [NQF #1878]; (2) Tamoxifen/Aromatase Inhibitors for Stage I-III ER/PR+ [NQF #220]; (3) radiation among stage I-III breast conserving surgery or mastectomy patients [NQF #0219]. Stage II-III colorectal cancer measures included receipt of: (1) carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing; (2) surveillance colonoscopy; and (3) computed tomography (CT) among resected patients [NCCN 2.2023 COL-8]. We assessed receipt of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the first 15 months after prostate cancer diagnosis to monitor disease recurrence. Poisson regression adjusting for sex, urbanicity, insurance type, and age at diagnosis was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing the receipt of care between AI and WH patients. RESULTS The sample sizes of AI patients differed across measures, ranging from 104 colorectal to 554 prostate cancer patients. Evidence of disparity was mixed for the breast cancer measures. AI breast cancer patients less frequently received HER2 testing within 3 months of diagnosis (AI=61% vs WH=71%), although adjustment attenuated this association (RR=0.90; CI: 0.81-1.01). Among stage I-III breast cancer patients, AIs more frequently received radiation within 1 year of surgery (AI=75% vs WH=71%) compared with WH patients (RR=1.11; CI: 1.01-1.21). Across colorectal cancer measures, AI patients performed as well or better than WH patients. Notably, AI patients more frequently received CEA testing (AI=71% vs WH=59%), a difference that persisted after adjustment (RR=1.17; CI: 1.03-1.32). AI prostate cancer patients received PSAs less often in the 15 months following diagnosis (AI=82% vs WH=88%) than WH patients (RR=0.96; CI: 0.93-1.00). CONCLUSIONS The magnitude and direction of AI/WH disparities in receipt of quality cancer care differed across measures. Racial misclassification is a challenge in AI health outcomes research, which may misrepresent the experience of AIs. Nevertheless, our findings provide insight into specific areas of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer care where local tailored interventions can be focused to improve care equity. Citation Format: Bradford E. Jackson, Marc E. Emerson, Lisa P. Spees, Chris D. Baggett, Hayley N. Morris, Ana I. Salas, Angelo Moore, Yadurshini Raveendran, Clare Meernik, Tomi Akinyemiju, Rachel Denlinger-Apte, Ronny A. Bell, Stephanie B. Wheeler. Assessing racial disparities in the receipt of quality care in the most prevalent cancers in American Indians [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B106.

Racial Disparities in Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States.

Young individuals racialized as Black are more likely to die after a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis than individuals racialized as White in the United States. This study examined racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant care among individuals racialized as Black and White with early-onset CRC. Individuals age 18-49 years racialized as non-Hispanic Black and White (self-identified) and newly diagnosed with CRC during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received recommended care (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) were considered to have received guideline-concordant care. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age and sex. The decomposition method was used to estimate the relative contribution of demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, health insurance, and facility type to the racial disparity in receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method was used to evaluate differences in time to treatment between patients racialized as Black and White. Of the 84,882 patients with colon cancer and 62,573 patients with rectal cancer, 20.8% and 14.5% were racialized as Black, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black were more likely to not receive guideline-concordant care for colon (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.22]) and rectal (aOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.33]) cancers. Health insurance explained 28.2% and 21.6% of the disparity among patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black had increased time to adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.32]) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.47]) compared with individuals racialized as White. Patients with early-onset CRC racialized as Black receive worse and less timely care than individuals racialized as White. Health insurance, a modifiable factor, was the largest contributor to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care in this study.

Quality of breast surgery care at a comprehensive cancer center and its rural affiliate hospital

BackgroundCancer centers are increasingly affiliating with rural hospitals to perform surgery. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes for cancer center surgeons operating at rural hospitals are understudied. MethodsFor patients with non-metastatic breast cancer from a rural catchment area who had oncologic surgery at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center (CC) or its rural affiliate (RA) from 2017 to 2022, we compared perioperative outcomes (composite of surgical site infection, seroma requiring drainage, and reoperation for margins) and receipt of guideline-concordant care (if patient received all applicable treatments) using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests. ResultsAmong 168 patients, 99 had surgery at RA, 60 CC. RA patients were older, higher stage, and more often had lumpectomy. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes (CC 10%, RA 14%, p ​= ​0.445) or guideline concordant care (RA 76%, CC 78%, p ​= ​0.846). ConclusionsCancer center surgeons operating at a rural affiliate had comparable perioperative outcomes and guideline-concordant care.

Cancer-Specific health equity metrics in the United States of America: A scoping review.

Health disparities in cancer care persist, and in some cases are growing, despite decades of research aimed at achieving equal outcomes for all Americans. There is growing consensus that reducing disparities will require a shift from aiming to provide care that is equal, to aiming to provide care that is equitable. The current landscape of metrics and interventions that move beyond equality (i.e., care provided equally to all patients) and towards equity (i.e., care provided variably and justly such that patients achieve equal outcomes) have not been characterized. Thus, the aim of this scoping literature review was to identify cancer-specific health equity metrics and interventions, and to explore current gaps in the field. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus were searched for studies published in English between 2012 and 2022 that implemented a metric to identify or an intervention to address cancer care inequities in the United States. The search returned 36,724 unique articles, of which 40 articles (1%) included an intervention to advance health equity. Metrics included timeliness of screening and treatment, receipt of goal-concordant care, and survival. The vast majority of articles were cross-sectional or cohort studies that described health disparities using one or more outcome metrics. Gaps identified included research on receipt of guideline-concordant care, interventions addressing multiple levels of structural and social determinants of health, inclusion of children and families, and patient-reported outcomes or other sources of data that could help inform interventions to advance equity.

ASO Visual Abstract: Association of Rural Residence and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care for Locoregional Colon Cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Association of Rural Residence and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care for Locoregional Colon Cancer.

Hospital Designations and Their Impact on Guideline-Concordant Care and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Do They Matter?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires complex multidisciplinary care. European evidence suggests potential benefit from regionalization, however, data characterizing the ideal setting in the United States are sparse. Our study compares the significance of four hospital designations on guideline-concordant care (GCC) and overall survival (OS). The Texas Cancer Registry was queried for 17,071 patients with PDAC treated between 2004 and 2015. Clinical data were correlated with hospital designations: NCI designated (NCI), high volume (HV), safety net (SNH), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited (ACS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression were used to assess associations with GCC [on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations]. Cox regression analysis assessed survival. Only 43% of patients received GCC. NCI had the largest associated risk reduction (HR 0.61, CI 0.58-0.65), followed by HV (HR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.90) and ACS (HR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95). GCC was associated with a survival benefit in the full (HR 0.75, CI 0.69-0.81) and resected cohort (HR 0.74, CI 0.68-0.80). NCI (OR 1.52, CI 1.37-1.70), HV (OR 1.14, CI 1.05-1.23), and SNH (OR 0.78, CI 0.68-0.91) all correlated with receipt of GCC. For resected patients, ACS (OR 0.63, CI 0.50-0.79) and SNH (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.75) correlate with GCC. A total of 43% of patients received GCC. Treatment at NCI and HV correlated with improved GCC and survival. Including GCC as a metric in accreditation standards could impact survival for patients with PDAC.

Association of area-level mortgage discrimination and guideline-concordant non–small cell lung cancer care in the United States.

3 Background: Disparities in receipt of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are well described. Discriminatory mortgage lending, which limits access to home ownership in specific neighborhoods overall and disproportionately for racialized groups, is a marker of systemic racism and lower levels of neighborhood investment. This may, in turn, decrease access to high quality care. We used the mortgage denial rate as a measure of housing discrimination and investigated its association with guideline-concordant NSCLC care. Methods: Mortgage denial rates were estimated at the zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) level using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database (2014-2019). Mortgage denial rates represent the proportion of denied home loans to total loans and were categorized into quartiles. Individuals ≥ 18 years diagnosed with NSCLC 2014-2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database and combined with HMDA. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between mortgage discrimination and receipt of guideline-concordant care, including surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiation. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model examined the association between mortgage discrimination and time to chemotherapy initiation. Results: Cohort included 450,614 patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC resided in 33,120 ZCTAs. Individuals residing in ZCTAs with higher mortgage denial rates were more likely to be aged 45-64 years, male, non-Hispanic White, with private health insurance coverage and income < $40,000/year. 69% of all patients received guideline-concordant care. Likelihood of guideline-concordant care was lower in neighborhoods with higher mortgage denial rates, adjusting for age and sex (Table). This disparity was present in all care subgroups. Time to chemotherapy initiation was longer for patients in neighborhoods with higher mortgage denial rates. Conclusions: Mortgage discrimination is adversely associated with receipt of guideline-concordant NSCLC care. Our examination of institutional practices leading to barriers in access to resources highlights the critical need to understand the pathways through which area-level mortgage denials impact receipt of equitable cancer care.[Table: see text]

Improved survival in cervical cancer patients receiving care at NCI-designated cancer centers (457)

<b>Objectives:</b> Locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) remains a lethal disease in the United States, with the standard of care being concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) with brachytherapy. We investigated the effect of receiving care at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center on survival. <b>Methods:</b> Specific study variables from the California Cancer Registry (CCR) were extracted for women diagnosed with locally advanced CC from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016, and who had received radiation treatment. Kaplan-Meier was used to compare CC-specific survival by care (diagnosis and/or treatment) at an NCI- designated cancer center using a log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess whether <i>')</i> care at an NCI-designated cancer center was associated with risk of CC-specific death, <i>2)</i> whether this association remained after adjusting for hypothesized confounders, and <i>3)</i> whether the association could be explained by the receipt of a guideline-concordant standard of care, CRT and brachytherapy, treatment. <b>Results:</b> The median age of the patients (<i>n</i>=4,250) was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 41-61 years), with a median follow-up time of 2.7 years (IQR: 1.3-6.0 years). Of the 4,250 patients in the sample, 33% were cared for at an NCI-designated cancer center, and 29% died of CC. The Kaplan-Meier plot showed a distinct survival advantage for those who received care at an NCI-designated cancer center (p=0.0001). The hazard of death due to CC was reduced by 21% for those cared for at NCI-designated cancer centers (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89). Adjusting for guideline-concordant treatment as well as other covariates minimally attenuated the hazard ratio to 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95), suggesting that the CC-specific survival advantage associated with care at NCI-designated cancer centers may not be due to receipt of guideline-concordant treatment alone. <b>Conclusions:</b> In the era of personalized medicine for locally advanced cervical cancer, we continue to seek out treatment options that will benefit survival. Our study shows a statistically significant cervical cancer survival benefit among patients receiving care at NCI- designated cancer centers versus those who are cared for elsewhere. This difference does not appear to be explained by receipt of guidelineconcordant care alone and may instead be due to structural, organizational, provider, or otherwise unknown patient characteristics within and outside of an NCI designation. Further understanding of these potential factors will promote equality across institutions and oncology care facilities as well as survival equity for cervical cancer patients.

Racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care for early-onset colorectal cancer in the U.S.

6544 Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer patients who are Black are less likely to survive than white patients, even for early-stage disease, possibly due to differences in receipt of guideline-concordant care. This study evaluated racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant colon and rectal cancer care in a large nationwide sample. Methods: Non-Hispanic Black and white individuals aged 20-49 years newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received all care recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) for which they were eligible according to cancer subsite and clinical and pathological TNM stage were considered guideline concordant. Demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, and health insurance coverage type were added sequentially to a series of multivariable models to estimate contribution to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care. Racial disparities in time from diagnosis date (among rectal cancer patients eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and surgery date (among colon cancer patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy) to date of chemotherapy initiation was evaluated using restricted mean survival time. Results: Of the 84,728 colon and 62,483 rectal cancer patients, 20.8% and 14.5% were Black, respectively. Black patients were less likely to receive guideline concordant care than white patients diagnosed with colon and rectal cancer, respectively (Table). Demographic characteristics and comorbidities combined explained less than 5% of the disparity, while health insurance coverage type explained 28.6% and 19.4% of the disparity among colon and rectal cancer patients, respectively. Restricted mean time to chemotherapy was statistically significantly longer among Black than white patients for colon (54.0 vs 48.7 days, p &lt;.001) and rectal cancers (49.6 vs 40.9 days, p &lt;.001), respectively. Conclusions: Black patients diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer receive worse and less timely care than their white counterparts. Differences in health insurance coverage type, a modifiable factor, were the largest identified contributor to the racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care, suggesting that improved access to care could help mitigate disparities in cancer outcomes. [Table: see text]

The Role of Safety-Net Hospitals in Reducing Disparities in Breast Cancer Care.

Advances in breast cancer screening and systemic therapies have been credited with profound improvements in breast cancer outcomes; indeed, 5-year relative survival rate approaches 91% in the USA (U.S. National Institutes of Health NCI. SEER Training Modules, Breast). While breast cancer mortality has been declining, oncologic outcomes have not improved equally among all races and ethnicities. Many factors have been implicated in breast cancer disparities; chief among them is limited access to care which contributes to lower rates of timely screening mammography and, once diagnosed with breast cancer, lower rates of receipt of guideline concordant care (Wu, Lund, Kimmick GG et al. in J Clin Oncol 30(2):142-150, 2012). Hospitals with a safety-net mission, such as the essential hospitals, historically have been dedicated to providing high-quality care to all populations and have eagerly embraced the role of caring for the most vulnerable and working to eliminate health disparities. In this article, we review landmark articles that have evaluated the role safety-net hospitals have played in providing equitable breast cancer care including to those patients who face significant social and economic challenges.

Is Medicaid Expansion Associated with Improved Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer Survival? An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

This retrospective study of 86413 patients (40-64years old) undergoing surgical resection for a new diagnosis of invasive, nonmetastatic colon cancer included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010 to 2015 compared overall survival (OS) in MES to NES. Cox proportional hazard models, fit for OS, and propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis were performed. In this sample, 51297 cases (59.2%) lived in MES and 35116 (40.8%) in NES. Medicaid expansion states had earlier pathological stage compared to NES (stage I 25.38% vs 24.17%, stage II 32.93 vs 33.4%, and stage III 41.69 vs 42.43%; P < .001). 5-year OS in MES was higher than NES (79.1% vs 77.3%; P < .001); however, on both multivariable analysis (MVA) and PSM analysis, MES did not have significantly different OS from NES (hazard ratio (HR), .99, 95% confidence interval (CI), .95-1.03; P = .570; HR, .99, 95% CI, .95-1.03; P = .68). Among NCDB patients with invasive, nonmetastatic colon cancer residing in MES at time of diagnosis was associated with earlier pathological stage. However, on both MVA and PSM analysis, OS was not significantly different in MES vs NES. Research on patient outcomes, such as receipt of guideline concordant care, can further inform the impact of insurance coverage expansion efforts on cancer outcomes.

Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Does Not Explain Breast Cancer Mortality Disparities by Race in Metropolitan Atlanta.

Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in the United States are well documented. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women are more likely to die of their disease than their non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. The disparity is most pronounced among women diagnosed with prognostically favorable tumors, which may result in part from variations in their receipt of guideline care. In this study, we sought to estimate the effect of guideline-concordant care (GCC) on prognosis, and to evaluate whether receipt of GCC modified racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. Using the Georgia Cancer Registry, we identified 2,784 NHB and 4,262 NHW women diagnosed with a stage I-III first primary breast cancer in the metropolitan Atlanta area, Georgia, between 2010 and 2014. Women were included if they received surgery and information on their breast tumor characteristics was available; all others were excluded. Receipt of recommended therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, and anti-HER2 therapy) as indicated was considered GCC. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the impact of receiving GCC on breast cancer mortality overall and by race, with multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). We found that NHB and NHW women were almost equally likely to receive GCC (65% vs 63%, respectively). Failure to receive GCC was associated with an increase in the hazard of breast cancer mortality (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37-2.20). However, racial disparities in breast cancer mortality persisted despite whether GCC was received (HRGCC: 2.17 [95% CI, 1.61-2.92]; HRnon-GCC: 1.81 [95% CI, 1.28-2.91] ). Although receipt of GCC is important for breast cancer outcomes, racial disparities in breast cancer mortality did not diminish with receipt of GCC; differences in mortality between Black and White patients persisted across the strata of GCC.

Receipt of guideline-concordant care among young adult women with breast cancer.

Little is known about the real-world care of young adult (YA) females (aged 20-39years) with breast cancer. This study describes factors associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) among YAs. The authors identified 1259 YA women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 2013 in the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care study. Hospital records were re-abstracted, and treatment was verified. Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's 2013 breast cancer guidelines, the authors assessed the receipt of GCC by cancer subtype among a subset of YAs (n=952). Associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and GCC receipt were examined. Most YAs were 35 to 39years old (51.2%) and partnered (56.4%); half had hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors. GCC was found for 81.7% of YAs. Relationships between sociodemographic and clinical factors and GCC receipt differed by subtype. Stage was the only significant predictor of GCC receipt for all subtypes (stage II vs III: odds ratio [OR] for HR+/HER2+, 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.50; OR for HR-/HER2+, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.07-0.25; OR for HR-/HER2-, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.55-9.62; OR for HR+/HER2-, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.63-5.80). GCC is high among YAs with breast cancer. The effects of sociodemographic factors and treatment facility size on GCC differ by subtype. Consistent with recommendations, tumor biology, not age, is associated with GCC for all subtypes. Future studies should assess the effect of GCC on survival among YAs.

The Head and Neck Survivorship Tool (HN-STAR) Trial (WF-1805CD): A protocol for a cluster-randomized, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, pragmatic trial to improve the follow-up care of head and neck cancer survivors

Survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) can have multiple health concerns. To facilitate their care, we developed and pilot-tested a clinical informatics intervention, HN-STAR. HN-STAR elicits concerns online from HNC survivors prior to a routine oncology clinic visit. HN-STAR then presents tailored evidence-based clinical recommendations as a clinical decision support tool to be used during the visit where the oncology clinician and survivor select symptom management strategies and other actions. This generates a survivorship care plan (SCP). Online elicitation of health concerns occurs 3, 6, and 9 months after the clinic visit, generating an updated SCP each time. HN-STAR encompasses important methods of improving survivorship care (e.g., needs assessment, tailored interventions, dissemination of guidelines) and will be evaluated in a pragmatic trial to maximize external validity. This hybrid type 1 implementation-effectiveness trial tests HN-STAR effectiveness while studying barriers and facilitators to implementation in community oncology practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. Effectiveness will be measured as differences in key survivorship outcomes between HNC participants who do and do not use HN-STAR over one year after the clinic visit. The primary endpoint is HNC-specific quality of life; other outcomes include patient-centered measures and receipt of guideline-concordant care. Implementation outcomes will be assessed of survivors, providers, and clinic stakeholders. The hybrid design will provide insight into a dose-response relationship between the extent of implementation fidelity and effectiveness outcomes, as well as how to incorporate HN-STAR into standard practice outside the research setting.