Reasoning Ability Of Students Research Articles

INVESTIGASI KEMAMPUAN BERNALAR ILMIAH SISWA MELALUI IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MATERI FISIKA FLUIDA STATIS

In this 21st century, students are required to have skills in facing the challenges of globalization, one of which is scientific reasoning skills. Scientific reasoning is the ability to think systematically and logically to solve problems. Six indicators of scientific reasoning ability include conversion reasoning, proportional reasoning, variable control, probabilistic reasoning, correlation reasoning, and hypothesis-deductive reasoning. Scientific reasoning ability can be improved by using learning models that encourage students to think at a higher level, one of which is the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The purpose of this research is to determine the scientific reasoning ability of students through the application of the PBL model on static fluid physics material. This type of research is descriptive quantitative and qualitative. This research was conducted in class XI MIPA 4 SMAN 3 Jember. Data collection techniques in this study using observation techniques, interviews, tests, and documentation. Data analysis techniques in this study are data collection, data reduction, data presentation, data interpretation, and conclusion drawing. The results obtained are the average score of students' reasoning ability on the six indicators of scientific reasoning in the very good category. So it is concluded that the PBL model can improve students' scientific reasoning ability in static fluid physics material.

Profile of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students of SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran in Solving Problems of Arithmetic Rows and Rows

This study describes the profile of students' mathematical reasoning ability in solving arithmetic rows and series problems. Based on the results of observations and interviews with the mathematics teacher of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran Malang, information was obtained that 83% of students in the class tended not to be able to conclude the answer. This descriptive research uses a qualitative approach. The sample of this research is 19 students of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran. They then selected one each in the high, medium, and low-level categories. Then, interviews were conducted with each subject to explore deeper information. The test instrument used is 1 question that contains four indicators of mathematical reasoning ability. The test results obtained that students in the high mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 7 students, with a percentage of 36.85%. Students in the moderate mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 8 students, with a rate of 42.10%. Students in the low mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 4 students, with a rate of 21.05%. Based on the results of the data analysis, it is shown that high-category students fulfill four indicators of reasoning ability according to their abilities. Medium-category students correctly fulfill three indicators of mathematical reasoning ability: writing conjectures, doing work, and providing reasons/evidence. Low-category students only fulfill one indicator of mathematical reasoning ability, namely writing conjectures.

Kemampuan penalaran matematis konten PLSV ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa di SMP

This study was motivated by the low mathematical reasoning ability of students. This happens because students cannot fulfill the indicators of mathematical reasoning. This study aims to describe students' mathematical reasoning ability on the material of linear equation one variable based on students' learning style. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The subjects of this study were three students consisting of one visual learning style student, one audiotorial learning style student, and one kinesthetic learning style student of class VIII A SMP Negeri 1 Kemusu. Data collection techniques in this study used questionnaires, tests, and interviews. Questionnaires were used to categorize students' learning styles. While the test was conducted to determine the mathematical reasoning ability of students and interviews were conducted to strengthen the answers to the test questions that had been done. The results of this study indicate that visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style students have high mathematical reasoning and audiotorial learning style has low mathematical reasoning.

Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: A brief report of case-based clinical reasoning approach.

Case-based clinical reasoning (CBCR) is the proposed method to improve clinical reasoning. This brief report aimed to evaluate CBCR effectiveness to improve clinical reasoning via an online course. This study is a brief report of a before-after quasi-experimental study to evaluate CBCR in medical students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Ten online weekly 2-hour sessions of CBCR presentations were instructed to medical students. Each session started with an illness script, and then, the instructor posed the students' five clinical questions in five steps according to the CBCR approach. The clinical reasoning ability of students was evaluated before and 2 weeks after the online courses using four types of standard clinical questions. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the difference between pretest and posttest examination scores. This brief report revealed that twenty-one medical students participated in all ten sessions of the CBCR online course and were evaluated in pretest and posttest examinations. A significant improvement in the clinical reasoning total scores in the posttest examination compared with the pretest examination was observed (P = 0.001). In terms of specific types of clinical questions, the mean posttest scores for clinical reasoning problem (CRP) and key feature (KF) examinations were higher than the pretest scores (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). Applying the CBCR approach improved the total clinical reasoning score of medical students during the course. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this improvement would persist in workplace settings or not.

Development Status and Related Factors of Mental Reasoning Ability in Children with Hearing Impairment

Objectives: This research aims to determine the factors that contribute to improving mental reasoning ability in children with hearing impairment. To achieve this objective, 6 six factors were tested to determine their impact on the mental health reasoning of children. Methods: The research is based on quantitative data; a Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 195 doctors. SPSS version 29 was used to calculate Pearson correlations and analysis of variance. Results: Age, health behavior, duration of the hearing, communication methods, educational support services, and hearing aids were significant factors influencing the mental reasoning ability of students. Conclusion: In proceeding with the theoretical contribution of this research and filling the gaps in knowledge, the study has some practical implications for improving the mental reasoning ability of children with hearing impairment

Perbedaan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional pada Tingkat SMP

This research aims: (1) students' mathematical reasoning ability using the Discovery Learning learning model is higher than students' mathematical reasoning ability using conventional learning models in class VII MTs Yaspi Labuhan Deli, (2) the process of solving answers made by students in solving problems in the Discovery Learning learning model and Conventional learning model. This type of research is quantitative research with Quasi-Experimental methods. This research was conducted at MTs Yaspi Labuhan Deli. The sampling technique in this study uses Purposive Sampling techniques, namely class VII-A as a class taught with a Discovery Learning learning model and class VII-B as a class taught with a conventional learning model. The data collection instrument used was in the form of observation sheets and student mathematical reasoning ability test sheets in the form of 3 essay questions. Data analysis in this study used t-Test with Independent Sample t-Test technique with the help of SPSS 20 program. The results of this study showed that the average score of classes taught using the discovery learning model was 78,01 and classes taught using conventional learning models were 72,22. For hypothesis testing carried out using a t-test, from the calculation results obtained a value of (2.664) > (1.66757) with a Sig.2-tailed level of 0.010 < 0.05, which means that rejected and was accepted, so that it is concluded that there is a significant difference in the average mathematical reasoning ability of students using the Discovery Learning learning model and the Conventional learning model. Based on the analysis of the process of completing students' answers to the mathematical reasoning ability test that get Discovery Learning learning is better than students who get conventional learning.

Student Reasoning Based on Mathematical Ability in Solving HOTS Problems through Differentiated Learning

The mathematical abilities of students with reasoning are closely interrelated. The HOTS-type problem is an effort to improve reasoning ability. The ability of students to solve HOTS questions is still relatively low. Through a differentiated learning model, it is expected to help students in the learning process that suits their needs. The purpose of this study is to describe the application of differentiated learning models and describe the mathematical reasoning ability of students who have low, medium, and high abilities. This type of research is qualitatively descriptive with instruments in the form of observation sheets, questionnaires, test questions and interviews. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. Test the validity of data using triangulation techniques. The results of this study show that differentiated learning can improve students' ability to reason. Four indicators of mathematical reasoning are, students' ability to present mathematical problems in the form of written statements, students' ability to make conjectures, students' ability to manipulate mathematics, and students' ability to draw conclusions from problems. Subjects with a high level of reasoning meet two indicators. Whereas subjects with moderate levels of reasoning met only three indicators and subjects with low levels of reasoning met only two indicators. Mathematics teachers should provide learning that is in accordance with the learning style of students and students should also do HOTS type questions more often.

Mathematical Olympiad issues to identify students' reasoning ability using Polya's model

This research aims to describe the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students in solving mathematical Olympiad problems based on problem-solving of the Polya model. This study employed descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach. Data were collected by using observation, documentation, and interviews. The study subjects were 27 junior high school students participating in the National Science Competition in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the Miles and Huberman analysis model was used as the data analysis. The results of this study indicated that: (1) the level of students’ mathematical reasoning-ability based on the problem-solving of Polya models in the category of "sufficiently competent" (high-group students), in the category of "less competent" (medium-group students), and in the category of "incompetent" (low-group students); (2) the most complex and rarely performed stages by students in Polya’s model were at the "devising a plan" and "looking back" stages; and (3) the Polya's model used in solving mathematical Olympiad test items was more suitable for those considered as routine-questions, and it was not suitable for non-routine questions. This study also showed that, on average, the students had difficulty finding initial ideas to start working on the test items.

Differences in the Improvement of Statistical Reasoning Ability Based on Students' Self-Regulated Learning Level in Online Learning Using LMS

In the literature, studies on technology-supported learning, especially using LMS, have been widely carried out during a pandemic. However, little is known about LMS, which is interesting and helps to develop students' statistical reasoning abilities for online learning by considering the students' Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) levels (High, medium and low). This study aims to examine and analyze the differences in statistical reasoning abilities of students who study using LMS in terms of SRL levels (high, medium and low). This study uses a quantitative method with the type of One-group pre-test post-test design. What took sampled randomly at the University of Pasundan Bandung, totalling 54 third-level students of Pasundan University Bandung, Indonesia. Research data related to statistical reasoning abilities were collected through a test consisting of six questions. In contrast, SRL level data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of 46 question items. Paired t-test and One-way ANOVA analysis were applied to answer the research hypothesis. The results of the study concluded that students studying with LMS with High SRL obtained a higher increase in statistical reasoning ability than students studying with LMS with Medium and low SRL categories, with the criteria for improvement in the three categories being in the high and medium improvement categories. Research findings related to learning using LMS can be used as an alternative learning model in online learning situations.

Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMK dalam Memecahkan Masalah Barisan dan Deret Aritmatika

The learners must have reasoning ability. The level of mathematical reasoning ability of students plays an important role in solving mathematical problems, and the application of mathematics to everyday life. This study was conducted with the aim of describing the level of mathematical reasoning of class X SMK Graha Madina Singosari. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative and the data collection procedure in this research is a written test. Students with low reasoning abilities show that they have not carried out a coherent problem solving process. They did not make any allegations regarding the problem at hand. Students with moderate abilities have carried out procedures coherently but not all questions have been answered correctly. The indicators achieved are making conjectures, carrying out mathematical manipulations and compiling evidence or reasons for the correctness of the solution. Meanwhile, students with high reasoning abilities fulfill all the predetermined indicators so as to reach the correct solution. However, students' mathematical reasoning abilities still need special attention in order to improve because only a third of students have high abilities.

The Influence of the Connected Mathematics Project Model on Mathematics Learning on Students’ Mathematics Learning on Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Abilities at SMAN 2 Rumbio Jaya

This research was motivated by the problem of low mathematical reasoning ability of students in mathematics learning in grade XI SMAN 2 Rumbio Jaya. One solution to overcome this problem is to use the connected mathematics project (CMP) learning model. The purpose of this study was to improve the mathematical reasoning ability of high school students. This type of research is quasi-experimental research or pseudo-experiments involving two classes that are given different treatments, namely the experimental class and the control class. The research subjects consisted of class XI where class XI IPS1 was an experimental class with a total of 19 people and class XI IPS2 in the form of a control class with a total of 21 people. The sample technique uses simple random sampling. Before being given experimental class treatment and control class is first given a test, namely pretest, and after being given experimental class treatment and control class given posttest test. The results of this study, students' mathematical reasoning ability in the control class was found to be on average in the control class of 76.19 while in the experimental class it was found to be an average of 83.00. So that the Connected Mathematics Project model has a significant effect on the mathematical reasoning ability of grade XI students of SMA Negeri 2 Rumbio Jaya. This is evidenced by an independent t-test, where the sig value is 0.000 < 0.05.

The Influence Of Concept Map And Mind Mapping On Students' Concept Understanding And Mathematical Reasoning Ability

This study aims to find out whether there is an influence on the ability to understand concepts and mathematical reasoning of students who are taught with Concept Maps and Mind Mapping in class VIII MTs Daar al-Uluum Asahan Modern Islamic Boarding School in the 2021-2022 Academic Year Range. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental research type. The population is all class VIII students of MTs Modern Daar al-Uluum Asahan Islamic Boarding School for the 2021-2022 Academic Year Range, consisting of 2 classes and a total of 60 students, who were also sampled in this study. The test instrument used to determine students' ability to understand concepts and mathematical reasoning is in the form of a description. Data analysis was carried out by analysis of variance (ANAVA). The results of these findings showed: 1). The ability to understand concepts of students who were taught using the Concept Map was better than students who were taught with Mind Mapping in the material of Number Patterns in class VIII; 2). The mathematical reasoning ability of students who were taught by using Concept Map was no better than students who were taught by Mind Mapping on Number Pattern material in grade VIII; 3). The ability to understand concepts and mathematical reasoning of students who were taught by using the Concept Map was better than students who were taught by Mind Mapping in the material of Number Patterns in class VIII; 4). There is a significant interaction between the learning methods used and the ability to understand concepts and students' mathematical reasoning in the matter of number patterns. The conclusion in this study explains that students' conceptual comprehension and mathematical reasoning abilities are more appropriate to be taught with concept maps than mind maps.

Creative Reasoning Ability of Students Based on Intrinsic Cognitive Load

Kemampuan penalaran kreatif matematis merupakan kemampuan yang penting untuk dikuasai siswa. Kenyataannya, kemampuan penalaran kreatif matematis siswa cenderung bermasalah. Salah satu hal yang diyakini berpengaruh terhadap kesulitan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah pada matematika adalah beban kognitif intrinsic yang dihadapi. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan secara mendalam gambaran kemampuan penalaran kreatif siswa ditinjau berdasarkan beban kognitif intrinsic. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologi. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII di salah satu MTs Negeri di Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota, Provinsi Sumatera Barat yang telah mempelajari materi bangun ruang sisi datar. Data dikumpulkan melalui teknik tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang memiliki beban kognitif intrinsic rendah dapat melakukan penalaran kreatif matematis dengan cukup konsisten. Siswa yang memiliki beban kognitif intrinsic sedang cukup bisa melakukan penalaran kreatif matematis tetapi belum konsisten. Sedangkan siswa yang memiliki beban kognitif intrinsic tinggi hampir tidak dapat melakukan penalaran kreatif matematis. Sebagai kesimpulan, diperoleh bahwa semakin rendah beban kognitif intrinsic yang dialamisiswa, semakin baik kemampuan penalaran kreatif matematis yang ia miliki. Berdasarkan kesimpulan tersebut, direkomendasikan untuk melakukan penelitian yang mengacu kepada penggunaan desain pembelajaran yang tepat untuk mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran kreatif matematis siswa pada masa yang akan datang. Mathematical creative reasoning is an essential ability for students. In reality, students' mathematical creative reasoning skills tend to be problematic. One thing that is believed to affect students' difficulties in solving problems in mathematics is the intrinsic cognitive load they face. Therefore, this study aims to describe students' creative reasoning abilities regarding intrinsic cognitive load in depth. This study uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII from one of the state Islamic junior high schools in Lima Puluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra Province, which studied the materials for flat and solid geometry. Data was collected through test and interview techniques. The study results show that students with low intrinsic cognitive load can consistently perform creative mathematical reasoning. Students with moderate intrinsic cognitive load can do creative mathematical reasoning but are inconsistent. Meanwhile, students with a high intrinsic cognitive load can almost not do creative mathematical reasoning. In conclusion, it is found that the lower the intrinsic cognitive load experienced by students, the better their creative mathematical reasoning abilities will be. Based on the conclusion, research is recommended to use suitable learning designs to develop students' mathematical creative reasoning skills in the future.

Analysis of students' mathematical reasoning ability in class IX in solving SPLDV problems

This study aims to determine the mathematical reasoning ability of students in one of the State Junior High Schools in Karawang Regency in solving two-variable system of linear equations. The method used is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were 32 students of class IX E. The data collection technique was carried out by giving a mathematical reasoning ability test sheet in the form of a description of 4 questions. The data analysis technique used in this study is based on Miles and Huberman's data analysis technique which consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the test scores of students' mathematical reasoning abilities are classified as very low, because there are only 2 students who achieve the KKM score. Then also indicated by the percentage value there are 2 students with a percentage of 6% in the high category, 23 students with a percentage of 72% in the medium category and 7 students with a percentage of 22% in the low category.

Effect of Mathematics Learning Using Learning Video Media on the Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students

Effect of Mathematics Learning Using Learning Video Media on the Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students

The Influence of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Learning Approach on Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Class VIII Students of SMP Negeri 3 Pematangsiantar.

Mathematical reasoning ability is one of the learning objectives that are expected to develop optimally in students. But in reality, students' mathematical reasoning abilities cannot always be achieved by students optimally. This is also found in class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Pematangsiantar. One of the factors that causes this to happen is the lack of trained students to use and develop mathematical reasoning skills properly. One of the efforts that can be done to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities is to apply a contextual teaching and learning approach. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the mathematical reasoning ability of students who used a contextual teaching and learning approach was better than the mathematical reasoning abilities of students who used conventional learning in class VIII of SMP Negeri 3 Pematangsiantar. The type of research used was a quasi-experimental design with a posttest only control design. design. The population in this study were eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Pematangsiantar. Sampling was done by random sampling technique. Class VIII-7 was selected as the experimental class and class VIII-8 as the control class. The research instrument used was a final test sheet in the form of description questions to see students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the analysis of the results of the final test of students' mathematical reasoning abilities, it was concluded that mathematical reasoning abilities by learning using a contextual teaching and learning approach were better than learning using conventional learning, which could be seen at an error rate of 5%. This shows that there is an influence on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The average test for the experimental class is 82.63 and the control class is 60.59

Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Interaktif Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Peserta Didik Pada Materi Prisma

This study aims to examine the effect of interactive multimedia on students' mathematical reasoning abilities on prismatic material. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a post-test-only control group design. Students in one of the junior high schools in Gorontalo were the samples in this study, where class VIII-2 was the experimental class, and class VIII-1 was the control class. The experimental class was a class that was given learning treatment using interactive multimedia, and the control class was a class that was given learning treatment using PowerPoint. Data on students' mathematical reasoning abilities were collected by giving tests of mathematical reasoning abilities using questions in the form of descriptions. The data collected was then analyzed descriptively and inferentially. The results of the descriptive analysis obtained are the average mathematical reasoning ability of students in the experimental class is higher than the control class. These results are supported by the inferential analysis, which reveals that interactive multimedia has more effect on students' mathematical reasoning abilities than PowerPoint.

Study on the Logical Reasoning Ability Development of Junior High School Students Based on SOLO Taxonomy

Logical reasoning ability, as a vital part of China’s mathematics curriculum objectives, is one of the key abilities that junior high school students should possess. SOLO (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome) taxonomy is an analysis method pertaining to students’ response to a certain question. Based on SOLO taxonomy, this paper sets up an assessment scale that evaluates the logical reasoning ability level of junior high school students. After analyzing four specific cases, the paper obtains some enlightenment on mathematics teaching, which is supposed to help cultivate the logical reasoning ability of students in actual teaching.

Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri ditinjau dari Persepsi Siswa

Mathematical reasoning ability is a person's ability to think logically in drawing a conclusion from problem solving in the mathematics learning process. By thinking logically, students can have confidence that the mathematics they learn is reasonable so that it affects the mathematical information and knowledge that students receive. It will also lead to different perceptions of each student in participating in mathematics learning. To determine the ability of mathematical reasoning when viewed from the perception of students, it can be done by giving geometry questions. The purpose of this study was to describe the mathematical reasoning ability of students with positive and negative perceptions in working on geometry problems. This research uses a qualitative approach with exploratory descriptive research. This research was conducted at SMPN 2 Balongbendo with the research subjects of two students of class VIII E, with each of them being a student with positive perceptions and a student with negative perceptions. Data collection techniques used are tests and interviews, while to determine the validity of the data using time triangulation. The results of this study indicate that students with positive perceptions can achieve every indicator of mathematical reasoning ability. While students with negative perceptions have not been able to fulfill every indicator of mathematical reasoning ability.

Improving Student's Reasoning Ability Through The Tahfizh Al-Qur’an Program

Teaching tahfizh al-Quran is one way to build student competence to do reasoning in and memorizing the Al-Qur’an. Given the changes in vision and mission as stated in the competency-based curriculum, it is necessary to make concrete efforts to prepare and make its implementation successful. This study aims to identify the teaching method of tahfizh al-Quran at the Tafsir Hadis Major, to explain the strategy of optimally developing tahfizh al-Qur'an so that it can improve students' reasoning abilities and identify the level of students' reasoning ability after participating in the tahfizh al-Qur'an program at the Tafsir Hadis Major. This study is a development activity carried out in collaboration between students and lecturers to conceptually design the design of teaching materials based on experience and existing conditions. These two stages will always be accompanied by a process of evaluation and reflection to improve the designs developed. This research shows that first; the sima'i method is a method that is widely used by students in memorizing the Qur'an, secondly; the strategy of fostering tahfizh al-Quran should be done with the muraja'ah method, Third; From the results of the calculation of the student's reasoning ability test scores, the average score of students' reasoning abilities in the high category was 48.82, the average category was 41.06, and the low category has obtained an average of 39. These different average gains indicate that the levels of students' reasoning abilities are different.