Rearfoot Eversion Research Articles

An expository analysis of biomechanical and subjective impacts induced by shoe inserts in asymptomatic subjects: A systematic review on functionality and mechanisms of action

AbstractThis systematic review explores the biomechanical and subjective effects of shoe inserts, including foot orthotics (FOs) and insoles, in asymptomatic subjects. Aimed at understanding their implications, the review poses two key research questions: (i) the influence of shoe inserts on lower extremity biomechanics and subjective perception and (ii) the effects of different design characteristics on these aspects. Following Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines, a meticulous search of Scopus and PubMed from August 2022 to March 2023 yielded 34 articles, with 26 focusing on biomechanical effects and eight on comfort effects. The studies, conducted during static and dynamic activities, such as standing, walking, jogging, running, jumping, and cycling, reveal significant reductions in rearfoot eversion, knee joint forces, and lower extremity muscle forces through postings and wedging in FOs. Changes in stiffness impact rearfoot kinematics, plantar pressure distribution, and ankle–foot power distribution. Conversely, surface texture and arch variations demonstrate limited significance. FOs and shoe inserts, characterized by geometric, material, location, size, and fabrication features, effectively regulate forces and moments on the lower extremity. This control promotes uniform plantar pressure distribution and enhances comfort during various activities. These insights benefit manufacturers, clinicians, and stakeholders, providing a deeper understanding of the positive benefits of FOs and shoe inserts. However, further well‐designed studies on clinical populations are necessary to validate these findings and establish their clinical efficacy, as the current focus remains on healthy subjects.

Biomechanical effect between conventional and 3-dimensional printed customized foot orthoses on medial longitudinal arch support and rearfoot angle in adults with flexible flatfeet.

Customized foot orthoses are used to treat flexible flatfoot regarding medial longitudinal arch (MLA) support, alignment correction, and pain management. Recently, 3-dimensional (3D) printing orthosis has become the focus of discussion regarding function and manufacturing. We aimed to investigate differences in biomechanical effects between flat insole (Flat), conventional foot orthosis (Cinsole), and 3D printed foot orthosis (3Dinsole) use on MLA support and rearfoot alignment during walking in adult flexible flatfeet. Twelve men with flexible flatfoot were recruited. Data were collected and analyzed using a Vicon motion capture system under 3 trial conditions: Flat and >1 month after using Cinsole and 3Dinsole. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc tests was used to compare kinematics variables, foot pain, and satisfaction. Dynamic navicular drop significantly reduced with the use of the Cinsole and 3Dinsole compared with Flat (P < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.65). The maximum rearfoot eversion angle with the use of the Cinsole and 3Dinsole significantly reduced from Flat (P < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.56). Foot pain score significantly decreased after using foot orthoses; satisfaction between Cinsole and 3Dinsole was not significantly different. Thus, Cinsole and 3Dinsole are effective alternative treatments of MLA support and rearfoot alignment in adults with flexible flatfoot. 3D printing is a future technology with potential to replace conventional production methods. However, material characteristics, design, and manufacturing process can affect treatment outcomes; hence, our results may not represent all variations of 3D printed foot orthoses.

Individuals with asymptomatic hallux valgus exhibit altered foot kinematics during gait regardless of their foot posture

BackgroundA flatfoot has been believed to be closely associated with the development of hallux valgus; however, the association is still controversial. Abnormal foot kinematics has been identified as a possible risk factor for the development of hallux valgus, but it remains unclear whether foot posture contributes to abnormal foot kinematics. This is the first study to investigate the differences in foot kinematics during gait between individuals with and without hallux valgus, while controlling for foot posture. MethodsTwenty-five females with hallux valgus and 25 healthy females aged 18 to 22 were recruited. Foot posture was measured using normalized navicular height truncated and the leg-heel angle. Foot kinematic and kinetic data during gait were recorded by a three-dimensional motion capture system. To investigate the characteristics of foot kinematics in individuals with hallux valgus while controlling for foot posture, we used a propensity score matching method. The matching was obtained by using the 1:1 nearest-neighbor procedure and a caliper width of 0.2. FindingsTwelve pairs were matched. Individuals with hallux valgus had significantly increased midfoot dorsiflexion from 56% to 80% during stance phase, rearfoot eversion from 53% to 71%, and forefoot abduction from 5% to 29% compared with control. InterpretationIndividuals with hallux valgus have a flexible foot that cannot suppress the dynamic deformation of the rearfoot and midfoot during gait. To suppress the development of hallux valgus, interventions that aim to prevent dynamic deformations of the rearfoot and midfoot during gait may be necessary, regardless of their static foot posture.

Step width modification to change rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch angle during walking and running in individuals with pronated feet

BackgroundIndividuals with pronated feet often experience altered foot biomechanics, leading to increased risk of lower limb injuries. Step width modification has been proposed as a potential intervention to improve foot alignment during gait. Research questionDoes modifying step width influence rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) in individuals with pronated feet during walking and running? MethodsTwenty individuals with pronated feet underwent analysis during walking and running on treadmill, maintaining increased or decreased step width using real-time visual feedback. Three-dimensional motion analysis measured rearfoot eversion and MLAA during the stance phase of gait. ResultsWide step width significantly reduced peak rearfoot eversion during waking (mean difference — with normal step width — (MD) = 3.6°, p < 0.001) and running (MD = 4.4°, p < 0.001), time to peak rearfoot eversion during walking (MD = 16.6 p < 0.001) and running (MD = 13.8°, p = 0.014), rearfoot eversion at touch down (TD) during walking (MD = 1.3°, p = 0.004), rearfoot eversion excursion during running (MD = 4.3°, p < 0.001), and peak MLAA during walking (MD = 2.9°, p = 0.006) and MLAA excursion during running (MD = 4.8°, p = 0.004).By contrast, during running, narrow condition significantly increased peak rearfoot eversion (MD = 3.4°, p < 0.001). During walking, time to peak rearfoot eversion (MD = 16.1, p < 0.001), rearfoot eversion at TD (MD = 1.4°, p = 0.008), rearfoot eversion excursion (MD = 5.9°, p < 0.001), and peak MLAA (MD = 3.4°, p < 0.001) were significantly increased. SignificanceThis study highlights the potential of step width modification as a simple yet effective intervention to improve foot biomechanics in pronated feet individuals during walking and running. Further research could lead to the development of personalized strategies for pronated feet individuals.

Clinical and biomechanical characteristics of responders and non-responders to insoles in individuals with excessive foot pronation during walking

This study aimed to identify the clinical and biomechanical factors of subjects with excessive foot pronation who are not responsive (i.e., “non-responders”) to medially wedged insoles to increase knee adduction external moment. Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, forefoot-shank alignment, passive hip stiffness, and midfoot passive resistance of 25 adults with excessive bilateral pronation were measured. Also, lower-limb angles and external moments were computed during walking with the participants using control (flat surface) and intervention insoles (arch support and 6° medial heel wedge). A comparison between “responders” (n = 34) and “non-responders” (n = 11) was conducted using discrete and continuous analyses. Compared with the responders, the non-responders had smaller forefoot varus (p = 0.014), larger midfoot passive internal torque peak (p = 0.005), and stiffness measured by the torsimeter (p = 0.022). During walking, non-responders had lower angle peaks for forefoot eversion (p = 0.001), external forefoot rotation (p = 0.037), rearfoot eversion (p = 0.022), knee adduction (p = 0.045), and external hip rotation (p = 0.022) and higher hip internal rotation angle peak (p = 0.026). Participants with small forefoot varus alignment, large midfoot passive internal torque, stiffness, small knee valgus, hip rotated internally, and foot-toed-in during walking did not modify the external knee adduction moment (“non-responders”). Clinicians are advised to interpret these findings with caution when considering the prescription of insoles. Further investigation is warranted to fully comprehend the response to insole interventions among individuals with specific pathologies, such as patellofemoral pain and knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Multi-Segment Foot Kinematics during Gait in Adults with Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Flatfoot

PurposeTo investigate the differences in foot kinematics during gait between adults with asymptomatic and symptomatic flatfoot.MethodsThe study included 10 participants (six males and four females, aged 25.7 ± 6.5 years) with symptomatic flatfoot and 10 participants (eight males and two females, aged 21.2 ± 1.0 years) with asymptomatic flatfoot. Multi-segment foot kinematics were captured during barefoot gait analysis using a 3D software. Angles were calculated for the calcaneus with respect to the shank (Sha-Cal), the midfoot with respect to the calcaneus (Cal-Mid), and the metatarsus with respect to the midfoot (Mid-Met) during the stance phase.ResultsSome differences were noted between medium-to-large effect sizes. The symptomatic group had a decreased Mid-Met dorsiflexion angle at the initial contact to 50% of the stance phase compared with the asymptomatic group. The symptomatic group also showed decreased Mid-Met abduction at initial contact, larger Sha-Cal eversion angles at 10% of the stance phase, and larger Cal-Mid eversion angles at 50% and 70% of the stance phase compared to the asymptomatic group. The symptomatic group also had a larger peak Sha-Cal eversion angle than the asymptomatic group.ConclusionAdults with symptomatic flatfoot exhibit significant differences in foot kinematics towards decreased forefoot dorsiflexion at initial contact to mid-stance, decreased forefoot abduction at initial contact, and increased rearfoot eversion during the stance phase compared with those with asymptomatic flatfoot during gait. Pain may impair intersegmental motion.

Effects of running-induced fatigue on joint kinematics and kinetics during overground running: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study evaluated the acute fatigue-inducing effect of distance running on kinematics and kinetics during overground running. Standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to pool data across 16 studies. Effects during consistent (pre- and post-fatigue running speed within ± 5%) versus varied speed running (difference of >5% between running speeds) were analysed separately. There was strong evidence that running-induced fatigue significantly increases ground contact times at consistent running speeds (SMD 0.52 [95% CI 0.22, 0.82]) and moderate evidence that step length shortens at varied running speeds (SMD -1.27 [95% CI -1.79, -0.75]). There was strong evidence that fatigue does not change peak: hip and knee flexion angles, hip adduction angle, hip and knee internal rotation angles, hip and knee extension moments, hip and knee abduction moments, knee abduction angle, knee flexion and extension moments, knee adduction moment, rearfoot eversion angle, and plantarflexion moments, or knee flexion and plantarflexion range of motion during stance. Running-induced fatigue increases contact times and reduces step length, whereas lower-body joint angles and moments are unchanged. Minimising changes in stride parameters could provide a mechanism for reducing the effects of fatigue on running performance.

Whipping or tearing? The biomechanics of Achilles tendinopathy in rearfoot strike runners

BackgroundTwo biomechanical mechanisms for the development of Achilles tendinopathy in runners have been proposed: A whipping mechanism characterized by prolonged and excessive rearfoot eversion, and a tearing mechanism characterized by high eccentric plantar flexor forces. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if runners with and without a history of Achilles tendinopathy exhibited gait biomechanics consistent with either of these mechanisms. MethodsSeven male runners with previous or current Achilles tendinopathy and seven healthy male control runners were evaluated by three-dimensional gait analysis. Peak rearfoot eversion angle, rearfoot eversion excursion, duration of rearfoot eversion, and peak rearfoot inversion angle were compared between groups to evaluate the whipping mechanism of injury. Peak dorsiflexion angle, peak dorsiflexion velocity, and peak ankle power absorption were compared between groups to evaluate the tearing mechanism. Additionally, rearfoot eversion angle and sagittal plane ankle power waveforms were compared between groups using statistical parametric mapping. FindingsThere were no differences in any rearfoot eversion, inversion, or dorsiflexion variables or waveforms during running in the Achilles tendinopathy group compared to controls. InterpretationRearfoot strike runners with Achilles tendinopathy do not exhibit running biomechanics consistent with either the whipping or tearing mechanisms of injury.

Normative Running Kinematics in Healthy Adolescent Runners: A 2-Dimensional Video Analysis.

The literature on the running kinematics of youth distance runners is limited. We sought to describe 2-dimensional (2D) video analysis of running kinematics in healthy adolescent distance runners, which has not been previously described. We conducted an observational study of healthy, competitive runners between the ages of 14 and 18 years, prospectively recruited through local running clubs and our hospital's outreach between August 2019 and July 2023. Participants ran on a treadmill at a self-selected speed with markers attached to the thorax, pelvis, and lower extremities. A high-definition video camera recorded the runners in the sagittal and frontal planes. Kinematic measurements were completed using Dartfish software and reported as means and standard deviations. Of the 53 participants (51% boys, mean age: 16.0 ± 1.4 years) included in the 2D running analysis, 91% ran with a rearfoot strike pattern, with a mean foot inclination angle of 10.2° ± 6.2°. Knee flexion angle at initial contact was 13.2° ± 3.8°, tibia inclination angle was 8.5° ± 3.2°, and peak knee flexion was 44.5° ± 3.6°. Cadence was 168.7° ± 8.6°. Contralateral pelvic drop was 6.0° ± 2.2° and peak rearfoot eversion was 11.8° ± 3.6°. This study is the first to describe running kinematics as captured by 2D video in healthy adolescent runners and to identify kinematic variables that may differ from those of adult runners. Further research is required to determine if adult recommendations are applicable to adolescent populations.

Gait retraining targeting foot pronation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Foot pronation is a prevalent condition known to contribute to a range of lower extremity injuries. Numerous interventions have been employed to address this issue, many of which are expensive and necessitate specific facilities. Gait retraining has been suggested as a promising intervention for modifying foot pronation, offering the advantage of being accessible and independent of additional materials or specific time. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the effect of gait retraining on foot pronation. We searched four databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase from their inception through 20 June 2023. The Downs and Black appraisal scale was applied to assess quality of included studies. Two reviewers screened studies to identify studies reporting the effect of different methods of gait-retraining on foot pronation. Outcomes of interest were rearfoot eversion, foot pronation, and foot arch. Two authors separately extracted data from included studies. Data of interest were study design, intervention, variable, sample size and sex, tools, age, height, weight, body mass index, running experience, and weekly distance of running. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with random effects model in RevMan version 5.4. Fifteen studies with a total of 295 participants were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that changing step width does not have a significant effect on peak rearfoot eversion. The results of the meta-analysis showed that changing step width does not have a significant effect on peak rearfoot eversion. Results of single studies indicated that reducing foot progression angle (MD 2.1, 95% CI 0.62, 3.58), lateralizing COP (MD -3.3, 95% CI -4.88, -1.72) can effectively reduce foot pronation. Overall, this study suggests that gait retraining may be a promising intervention for reducing foot pronation; Most of the included studies demonstrated significant improvements in foot pronation following gait retraining. Changing center of pressure, foot progression angle and forefoot strike training appeared to yield more favorable outcomes. However, further research is needed to fully understand its effectiveness and long-term benefits.

Reductions in rearfoot eversion posture due to proximal muscle strengthening are dependent on foot-ankle varus alignment

BackgroundStrengthening the hip and trunk muscles may decrease foot pronation in upright standing due to expected increases in hip passive torque and lower-limb external rotation. However, considering the increased pronation caused by a more varus foot-ankle alignment, subjects with more varus may experience smaller or no postural changes after strengthening. ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of hip and trunk muscle strengthening on lower-limb posture during upright standing and hip passive torque of women with more and less varus alignment. MethodsThis nonrandomized controlled experimental study included 50 young, able-bodied women. The intervention group (n = 25) performed hip and trunk muscle strengthening exercises, and the control group (n = 25) maintained their usual activities. Each group was split into two subgroups: those with more and less varus alignment. Hip, shank, and rearfoot-ankle posture and hip passive external rotation torque were evaluated. Mixed analyses of variance and preplanned contrasts were used to assess prepost changes and between-group differences (α = 0.05). ResultsThe less-varus subgroup of the intervention group had a reduced rearfoot eversion posture (P = 0.02). No significant changes were observed in the less-varus subgroup of the control group (P = 0.31). There were no significant differences in posture between the control and intervention groups when varus was not considered (P ≥ 0.06). The intervention group had increased hip passive torque (P = 0.001) compared to the control group, independent of varus alignment. ConclusionDespite the increases in hip passive torque, the rearfoot eversion posture was reduced only in women with a less-varus alignment. Having more foot-ankle varus may prevent eversion reductions.

Increased Barefoot Stride Variability Might Be Predictor Rather than Risk Factor for Overuse Injury in the Military.

Footwear usage could be a promising focus in reducing musculoskeletal injury risk in lower extremities commonly observed among the military. The goal of this research was to find potential gait-related risk factors for lower leg overuse injuries. Cases (n = 32) were active-duty infantry soldiers who had suffered an overuse injury in the previous six months of service before enrolling in the study. The control group (n = 32) included infantry soldiers of the same age and gender who did not have a history of lower leg overuse injury. In the gait laboratory, individuals were asked to walk on a 5-m walkway. Rearfoot eversion, ankle plantar/dorsiflexion and stride parameters were evaluated for barefoot and shod conditions. Barefoot walking was associated with higher stride time variability among cases. According to the conditional regression analysis, stride time variability greater than 1.95% (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI (0.648 to 0.883), p < 0.001) during barefoot gait could predict lower leg overuse injury. Increased barefoot gait variability should be considered as a possible predictive factor for lower leg overuse injury in the military, and gait with military boots masked stride-related differences between soldiers with and without lower leg overuse injury.

Effects of Rearfoot Eversion on Foot Plantar Pressure and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Adolescent Athletes

Background: Foot malalignment can augment the risk of lower-extremity injuries and lead to musculoskeletal disorders. This study aimed to clarify the contribution of rearfoot alignment to plantar pressure distribution and spatiotemporal parameters during gait in healthy adolescent athletes. Methods: This retrospective study included 39 adolescent athletes who were divided into the rearfoot eversion and control groups according to a leg heel angle of 7°. A total of 78 legs were analyzed (45 and 33 legs in the rearfoot eversion [women, 53.3%] and control groups [women, 48.5%], respectively). Gait was assessed using an in-shoe plantar pressure measuring system and a wearable inertial sensor. Results: The foot plantar pressure distribution in the hallux was higher in the rearfoot eversion group than that in the control group (p = 0.034). Spatiotemporal parameters showed that the foot pitch angle at heel strike was significantly larger in the rearfoot eversion group than that in the control group (24.5° vs. 21.7°; p = 0.015). Total sagittal range of motion of the ankle during the stance phase of gait was significantly larger in the rearfoot eversion group than that in the control group (102.5 ± 7.1° vs. 95.6 ± 15.8°; p = 0.020). Logistic regression analysis revealed that plantar pressure at the hallux and medial heel and foot pitch angle at heel strike were significantly associated with rearfoot eversion. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that rearfoot eversion affects the gait patterns of adolescent athletes. Notably, leg heel angle assessment, which is a simple and quick procedure, should be considered as an alternative screening tool for estimating plantar pressure and spatiotemporal gait parameters to prevent sports-related and overuse injuries in adolescent athletes.

Characteristics and Future Direction of Tibialis Posterior Tendinopathy Research: A Scoping Review.

Background and Objectives: Tibialis posterior tendon pathologies have been traditionally categorized into different stages of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD), or adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), and more recently to progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize and characterize literature on early stages of PTTD (previously known as Stage I and II), which we will describe as tibialis posterior tendinopathy (TPT). We aim to identify what is known about TPT, identify gaps in knowledge on the topics of TPT, and propose future research direction. Materials and Methods: We included 44 studies and categorized them into epidemiology, diagnosis, evaluation, biomechanics outcome measure, imaging, and nonsurgical treatment. Results: A majority of studies (86.4%, 38 of 44 studies) recruited patients with mean or median ages greater than 40. For studies that reported body mass index (BMI) of the patients, 81.5% had mean or median BMI meeting criteria for being overweight. All but two papers described study populations as predominantly or entirely female gender. Biomechanical studies characterized findings associated with TPT to include increased forefoot abduction and rearfoot eversion during gait cycle, weak hip and ankle performance, and poor balance. Research on non-surgical treatment focused on orthotics with evidence mostly limited to observational studies. The optimal exercise regimen for the management of TPT remains unclear due to the limited number of high-quality studies. Conclusions: More epidemiological studies from diverse patient populations are necessary to better understand prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for TPT. The lack of high-quality studies investigating nonsurgical treatment options is concerning because, regardless of coexisting foot deformity, the initial treatment for TPT is typically conservative. Additional studies comparing various exercise programs may help identify optimal exercise therapy, and investigation into further nonsurgical treatments is needed to optimize the management for TPT.

Frontal plane projection angle predicts patellofemoral pain: Prospective study in male military cadets

BackgroundPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is a major source of knee pain. Identifying who may develop PFP is of paramount importance. PurposeTo assess whether Frontal plane projection angles (FPPA) and hand held dynamometry (HHD) strength measures can predict development of PFP. Study designProspective evaluation of individuals undertaking a military training programme. MethodsMale military recruits were enrolled and prospectively followed up from enrolment to completion of 12-weeks training. Lower limb kinematics (FPPA, Q-angle, hip adduction angle, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and rearfoot eversion angle) measured during running, single leg squatting (SLS), and single leg landing (SLL) and isometric muscle strength of hip abductors and knee extensors. ResultsBody mass, hip abductor muscle strength, Q-angle during SLS and SLL, FPPA during SLL all significantly different between the PFP and non-injured groups and predicted PFP, highest predictor variable was FPPA during SLL (Odds Ratio = 1.13, P = 0.01). A FPPA≥5.2° during SLL predicting PFP with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 70%. ConclusionParticipants who developed PFP had a number of physical factors significantly different than the non-injured group, most predictive was a larger FPPA during SLL, with angles greater than 5.2° associated with a 2.2x greater risk. Clinical relevanceAssessing FPPA during SLL could be used to determine who was predisposed to PFP.

Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Characteristics in People with Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent knee condition with many proposed biomechanically orientated etiological factors and treatments. We aimed to systematically review and synthesize the evidence for biomechanical variables (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) during walking and running in people with PFP compared with pain-free controls, and determine if biomechanical variables contribute to the development of PFP. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to October 2021. All study designs (prospective, case-control [± interventional component, provided pre-intervention data were reported for both groups], cross-sectional) comparing spatiotemporal, kinematic, and/or kinetic variables during walking and/or running between people with and without PFP. We identified 55 studies involving 1300 people with PFP and 1393 pain-free controls. Overall pooled analysis identified that people with PFP had slower gait velocity [moderate evidence, standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.72, -0.27], lower cadence (limited evidence, SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.74, -0.12), and shorter stride length (limited evidence, SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.80, -0.12). People with PFP also had greater peak contralateral pelvic drop (moderate evidence, SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.90, -0.03), smaller peak knee flexion angles (moderate evidence, SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.52, -0.08), and smaller peak knee extension moments (limited evidence, SMD -0.41, 95% CI -0.75, -0.07) compared with controls. Females with PFP had greater peak hip flexion (moderate evidence, SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.30, 1.36) and rearfoot eversion (limited evidence, SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.03, 1.14) angles compared to pain-free females. No significant between-group differences were identified for all other biomechanical variables. Data pooling was not possible for prospective studies. A limited number of biomechanical differences exist when comparing people with and without PFP, mostly characterized by small-to-moderate effect sizes. People with PFP ambulate slower, with lower cadence and a shortened stride length, greater contralateral pelvic drop, and lower knee flexion angles and knee extension moments. It is unclear whether these features are present prior to PFP onset or occur as pain-compensatory movement strategies given the lack of prospective data. PROSPERO # CRD42019080241.

The association between foot posture, single leg balance and running biomechanics of the foot

ObjectivesA mal-aligned foot posture (high-arched and flat feet) and poor single leg balance ability have been separately associated with foot injuries during running. Therefore, clinicians assess these routinely. However, the extent to which foot posture and single-leg balance ability affect actual foot biomechanics during running is not known. This study aims to investigate the association of foot posture, single-leg balance ability, and foot biomechanics during running. MethodThis is a cross sectional study of sixty-nine participants who had their foot postures and single-leg balance ability assessed. The Foot Posture Index and Balance Error Scoring System were used. Their foot kinetics was measured as they ran on an instrumented treadmill and foot kinematics was processed using a 3D motion capture system. Multiple-regression was used to analyse the variance of foot biomechanics explained by foot posture and single-leg balance ability. ResultsFoot posture and single-leg balance ability were found to account significantly for the variance in rearfoot eversion (24%) and forefoot dorsiflexion (7%). Two regression equations were derived, where rearfoot eversion and forefoot dorsiflexion during running may be predicted. ConclusionFoot posture and single-leg balance ability can predict rearfoot eversion and forefoot dorsiflexion only during running. Based on the regression equations, individuals with the same foot posture but different single-leg balance ability may exhibit different foot kinematics. However, the angular differences are small. The equations may be useful for clinicians working in places where running gait analysis equipment are not readily accessible. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these equations. In addition, further studies are necessary to investigate the effect of these two variables under different running conditions e.g. with footwear and with orthoses.

Assessment of fore-, mid-, and rear-foot alignment and their association with knee symptoms and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Hallux valgus, flatfoot, and rearfoot eversion are well-known major complications of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on the association between these foot malalignments and knee symptoms or function. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association between foot alignment and knee symptoms or function in patients with knee OA. Female patients aged ≥ 50years with symptomatic knee OA participated in this study. Knee symptoms and function were assessed using the Knee Society Scoring System (KSS). Hallux valgus, navicular/foot ratio, and leg heel alignment were used as the forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot alignment indices, respectively. The navicular/foot ratio was defined as the ratio of the navicular height to the total foot length. We performed multiple linear regression analysis to examine the associations between foot alignment and knee symptoms or function. Seventy-eight participants participated our study. KSS symptom score was significantly associated with navicular/foot ratio (regression coefficient [β], -0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], -109.2 to -20.5; P = 0.005), knee extensor strength (β, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.09; P = 0.004), and age (β, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.32; P = 0.036). KSS function score was not associated with foot alignments but with knee extensor strength (β, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.33; P = 0.001) and body mass index (β, -0.35; 95% CI, -2.82 to -0.66; P = 0.002). Knee symptoms were significantly associated with midfoot alignment in patients with medial knee OA. This suggests that lower navicular height in patients with medial knee OA may relate with the alleviation of knee symptoms. Key Points • In patients with medial knee OA, midfoot alignment was significantly associated with knee symptoms in patients with medial knee OA; however, knee function was not associated with foot alignment. • Lower navicular height in patients with medial knee OA may relate with the alleviation of knee symptoms.

Immediate effects of hip strap and foot orthoses on self-reported measures and lower limb kinematics during functional tasks in individuals with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised crossover clinical trial

BackgroundElevated patellofemoral joint stress has been associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). Changes in lower limb kinematics, such as excessive femoral adduction and internal rotation and excessive rearfoot eversion during the stance phase of functional activities, may increase patellofemoral stress. There is a lack of studies that assess the effects of interventions for controlling femur and subtalar joint movements during functional activities on self-reported measures in individuals with PFOA. Thus, the primary aim of the study is to determine the immediate effects of the hip strap and foot orthoses during level-ground walking and the single-leg squat test on self-reported outcomes. The secondary aim is to investigate whether the hip strap and foot orthoses result in the kinematic changes that these devices are purported to cause.MethodsTwenty-nine individuals with PFOA aged 50 years or older will take part in the study. The main outcome is pain intensity. The secondary outcomes are other self-reported measures (global rating of change, acceptable state of symptoms, ease of performance, and confidence) and lower limb kinematics (peak femoral adduction and internal rotation, and peak rearfoot eversion). These outcomes will be assessed during functional tasks performed under three conditions: (i) control condition, (ii) hip strap intervention, and (iii) foot orthoses intervention. To investigate whether these interventions result in the lower limb kinematic changes that they are purported to cause, three-dimensional kinematics of the femur and rearfoot will be captured during each task. Linear mixed models with two fixed factors will be used to test associations between the interventions (control, hip strap, and foot orthoses) and conditions (level-ground walking and single-leg squat test) as well as interactions between the interventions and conditions.DiscussionTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the immediate effects of the hip strap and foot orthoses on self-reported measures and lower limb kinematics during functional tasks in individuals with PFOA. The findings of this study will enable future trials to investigate the effects of these interventions in rehabilitation programmes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04332900. Registered on 3 April 2020.

Symptomatic and asymptomatic pronated feet show differences in the forefoot abduction motion during jogging, but not in the arch deformation

ABSTRACT Pronated feet have been associated with higher risks of running-related overuse injuries than neutral feet. However, it remains unclear why some pronated feet develop running-related injuries, while others do not. This study aimed to examine the differences in foot kinematics during jogging among individuals with symptomatic pronated feet (SP), asymptomatic pronated feet (AP) and asymptomatic neutral feet (AN). Thirty-nine recreational runners were recruited and classified into the SP, AP and AN groups. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and ANOVA were used to identify kinematic differences among three groups. The SPM results showed that the SP had larger forefoot abduction than the AN and AP during jogging, while three groups had similar rearfoot eversion during jogging. Both the AP and SP had larger forefoot sagittal range of motion (ROM) (mean difference = 3.5 and 4.8 deg, respectively) and smaller rearfoot sagittal ROM (mean difference = 5.0 and 3.5 deg, respectively) than the AN. Forefoot abduction during jogging may have the potential to identify pronated feet at greater risk of injury. Pronated feet, symptomatic or not, have comparable large forefoot sagittal ROM, i.e., arch deformation, compared to neutral feet. The findings could have implications for the injury aetiology and intervention strategies for SP.