Reamed Intramedullary Nailing Research Articles

Outcome of Locked Reamed Intramedullary Nail v/s K-NAIL Plus Augmented Plating in Aseptic Distal Femur Non-Union

Background: Aseptic nonunion of the distal femur presents a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, affecting patient outcomes and healthcare systems. Traditional treatments include locked reamed intramedullary nailing (LRIN) and K-nail with augmented plating, with varied reported efficacies. Objective: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of LRIN versus K-nail plus augmented plating in the treatment of aseptic nonunion of the distal femur, focusing on union rates, operative time, complications, and functional recovery. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 50 patients with aseptic nonunion of the distal femur were randomly assigned to undergo either LRIN (Group A) or K-nail plus augmented plating (Group B). The primary outcome measures included the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (mRUST) and rates of implant failure and infection. Secondary outcomes considered operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value of less than 0.05 deemed significant. Results: Group A exhibited higher mRUST scores at 12 weeks (4.84 vs. 4.16, p=0.010), 24 weeks (6.40 vs. 5.48, p<0.001), and 36 weeks (8.12 vs. 7.00, p<0.001). Nonunion rates at 36 weeks were lower in Group A (12% vs. 36%, p=0.047), with no significant differences in infection rates. Operative time was significantly longer for Group A (159.40±5.82 minutes) compared to Group B (123.96±6.20 minutes, p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in blood loss between the groups. Conclusion: LRIN outperformed K-nail plus augmented plating in promoting bone union in aseptic nonunion of the distal femur, with a lower nonunion rate and higher mRUST scores, despite a longer operative time.

Non-unions and wound infections do not differ following intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis for distal third femur fractures: a meta-analysis.

The fixation method of distal, extra-articular femur fractures is a controversially discussed. To ensure better stability itself, earlier mobilization and to prevent blood loss - all these are justifications for addressing the femur via reamed intramedullary nailing (RIMN). Anatomical reposition of multifragmentary fractures followed by increased risks of non-union are compelling reasons against it. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for rates of non-union and wound infection, as well as blood loss and time of surgery. According to the PRISMA guidelines we conducted this systematic review by searching the Cochrane, PubMed, Ovid, MedLine, and Embase databases. Inclusion criteria were the modified Coleman methodology score (mCMS) >60, age >18 years, and extra-articular fractures of the distal femur. Biomechanical and animal studies were excluded. By referring to title and abstract relevant articles were reviewed independently. In the consecutive meta-analysis, we compared 9 studies and 639 patients. There is no statistically significant difference comparing superficial wound infections when RIMN was performed (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.18 - 1.42; P = 0.19) as well as in deep wound infections (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.19-2.81; P = 0.62). However, these results were not significant. We also calculated for potential differences in the rate of non-unions depending on the surgical treatment applied. Data of 556 patients revealed an overall number of 43 non-unions. There was no significant difference in rate of non-unions between both groups (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.51-1.85; P = 0.92). No statistical difference was found in our study among RIMN and plate fixation in the treatment of distal femoral fractures with regard to the incidence of non-union and wound infections. Therefore, the indication for RIMN or plating should be made individually and based on the surgeon's experience.

Management of tibial shaft fractures with closed intra medullary interlocking nail among Indians.

It is of interest to document data on the well Reamed Intramedullary Nailing in Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures without Fibular Osteotomy among Indians. 120 patients with isolated tibial diaphyseal fractures were treated with IMIL nail (84 closed fractures, 16 type I open fractures, and 20 type II open fractures) were involved in this study. Research was carried out over a five-and-a-half-year period, from July 2013 to December 2018.According to Johner and Wruh's criteria, good functional findings were achieved in 70% of patients, better operational results in 15%, reasonable functional results in 5%, and poor functional results in 10% of cases after surgery. The percentage of union in the present analysis was 90%. The average time for union was 5 months, with 84 fractures healing before 5 months. Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing reduces length of stay in hospital, lowers the financial load, and promotes early return to work without the need for further surgical treatment such as partial fibular osteotomy.

Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis versus Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Extra Articular Distal Third Tibial Fractures

Introduction: Extraarticular distal third tibial fractures are highly controversial and difficult to treat despite of numerous methods of fixation. The most common methods of treating these fractures are minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and reamed intramedullary nailing (RIMN). Aims: The aim of this study is to compare and assess its demographic status, preoperative status and functional outcomes of these two groups of patients with extraarticular distal third tibial fractures. Methods:This prospective hospital based observational study of 36 patients with extra articular distal third tibial fractures was carried out from January 2018 to January 2021 at Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur. Thirty-six patients were included in the study and were divided into two groups of 18 each and were treated with MIPPO and RIMN methods and were followed up regularly. Clinical and functional outcome were evaluated at 12 months. Results: Out of 36 patients 20 were male and 16 were female. Mean age was 37.63with SD ± 11.43 years. Twenty two were right sided and 14 were left sided. Mean duration of surgery in MIPPO group was 75.33 with SD ± 14.64minutes and in RIMN group was 98.33with SD ± 18.96 minutes. There were 24 cases of associated fibular fractures. Two cases of surgical site infection and two cases of K-wire impingement on fibular side were encountered in MIPPO group whereas three cases of postoperative blisters were seen in RIMN group. All fractures united. The mean average time for fracture healing in MIPPO group was 25.55 weeks and in RIMN group was 27.55 weeks. The clinical and functional outcome were evaluated using American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system, the mean score in MIPPO group was 91.22 and in RIMN group was 90.77. Conclusion: There was a good outcome in MIPPO group than RIMN group for extra articular distal third tibial fractures.

Radiographic union score for tibia (RUST) scoring system in adult diaphyseal femoral fractures treated with intramedullary nailing: an assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

The Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) scoring system has been validated in multiple studies assessing the healing of tibial fractures. Our objective was to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability for the RUST in diaphyseal femoral fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nailing. A total of 60 sets of anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of diaphyseal femoral fractures treated by reamed IM nailing were randomly selected from a prospectively collected database. The 60 sets of radiographs were then scored by three reviewers using the RUST system. Interobserver reliability was measured at initial scoring. The 60 sets of radiographs were scored again by the three reviewers to calculate the intraobserver reliability. The RUST scores ranged from 4 to 12 with a mean score of 11.3 ± 1.3. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92) and the intraobserver ICC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94), which indicated excellent agreement. This study demonstrated that the RUST system can be used reliably in the assessment of healing in diaphyseal femur fractures treated by reamed intramedullary nailing, with excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures among adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThe purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the merits and drawbacks between reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN) and unreamed intramedullary nailing (URIN) among adults. MethodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE database through the PubMed search engine, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase, VIPI (Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to March 2020. Outcomes of interest included nonunion rates, implant failure rates, secondary procedure rates, blood loss, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rates, and pulmonary complications rates. ResultsEight randomized controlled trials were included. The result of nonunion rates shows that the nonunion rate is significantly lower in the RIN group (RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.09–0.48, Z = 3.63, P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences for the risk of implant failure rates (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.18–1.69, Z = 1.04, P = 0.30). The secondary procedure rates were significantly lower in the RIN group (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.12–0.66, Z = 2.91, P = 0.004). The result shows that the blood loss of URIN group is significantly lower (RR = 145.52, 95% CI = 39.68–251.36, Z = 2.69, P = 0.007). The result shows that there was no significant difference in the ARDS rates (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.37–6.29, Z = 0.59, P = 0.55) and the pulmonary complications rates between RIN group and URIN group (RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.61–4.17, Z = 0.94, P = 0.35). ConclusionsReamed intramedullary nailing would lead to lower nonunion rate, secondary procedure rate and more blood loss. Unreamed intramedullary nailing is related to a higher nonunion rate, secondary procedure rate and less blood loss. No significant difference is found in implant failure rate, ARDS rate and pulmonary complication rate between the two groups.

Impact of centre volume, surgeon volume, surgeon experience and geographic location on reoperation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures

Background:Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone injury, with a reported annual incidence of more than 75 000 in the United States. This study aimed to determine whether patients with tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nails experience a lower rate of reoperation if treated at higher-volume hospitals, or by higher-volume or more experienced surgeons.Methods:The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) was a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation to promote fracture union, treat infection or preserve the limb in patients with open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. Using data from SPRINT, we quantified centre and surgeon volumes into quintiles. We performed analyses adjusted for type of fracture (open v. closed), type of injury (isolated v. multitrauma), gender and age for the primary outcome of reoperation using multivariable logistic regression.Results:There were no significant differences in the odds of reoperation between high- and low-volume centres (p = 0.9). Overall, surgeon volume significantly affected the odds of reoperation (p = 0.03). The odds of reoperation among patients treated by moderate-volume surgeons were 50% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.88), and the odds of reoperation among patients treated by high-volume surgeons were 47% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.93).Conclusion:There appears to be no significant additional patient benefit in treatment by a higher-volume centre for intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Additional research on the effects of surgical and clinical site volume in tibial shaft fracture management is needed to confirm this finding. The odds of reoperation were higher in patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons; this finding may be used to optimize the results of tibial shaft fracture management. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00038129

In Acute Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures, Surgery with the Taylor Spatial Frame Versus Reamed Intramedullary Nailing Did Not Differ for Quality of Life or Pain at 2 Years.

In Acute Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures, Surgery with the Taylor Spatial Frame Versus Reamed Intramedullary Nailing Did Not Differ for Quality of Life or Pain at 2 Years.

Prognostic factors for predicting health-related quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

AimsUsing tibial shaft fracture participants from a large, multicentre randomized controlled trial, we investigated if patient and surgical factors were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at one year post-surgery.MethodsThe Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) trial examined adults with an open or closed tibial shaft fracture who were treated with either reamed or unreamed intramedullary nails. HRQoL was assessed at hospital discharge (for pre-injury level) and at 12 months post-fracture using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction, SMFA Bother, 36-Item Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical, and SF-36 Mental Component scores. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine if baseline and surgical factors, as well as post-intervention procedures within one year of fracture, were associated with these HRQoL outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.01. We hypothesize that, irrespective of the four measures used, prognosis is guided by both modifiable and non-modifiable factors and that patients do not return to their pre-injury level of function, nor HRQoL.ResultsFor patient and surgical factors, only pre-injury quality of life and isolated fracture showed a statistical effect on all four HRQoL outcomes, while high-energy injury mechanism, smoking, and race or ethnicity, demonstrated statistical significance for three of the four HRQoL outcomes. Patients who did not require reoperation in response to infection, the need for bone grafts, and/or the need for implant exchanges had statistically superior HRQoL outcomes than those who did require intervention within one year after initial tibial fracture nailing.ConclusionWe identified several baseline patient factors, surgical factors, and post-intervention procedures within one year after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture that may influence a patient’s HRQoL.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):22–32.

A Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Patients with Tibial Shaft Fractures at Risk for Infection After Operative Treatment.

Risk stratification of individual patients who are prone to infection would allow surgeons to monitor high-risk patients more closely and intervene early when needed. This could reduce infection-related consequences such as increased health-care costs. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML)-derived risk-stratification tool using the SPRINT (Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures) and FLOW (Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds) trial databases to estimate the probability of infection in patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (TSFs). Patients with unilateral TSFs from the SPRINT and FLOW trials were randomly split into derivation (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts. Random forest algorithms were used to select features that are relevant to predicting infection. These features were included for algorithm training. Five ML algorithms were trained in recognizing patterns associated with infection. The performance of each ML algorithm was evaluated and compared based on (1) the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC), (2) the calibration slope and the intercept, and (3) the Brier score. There were 1,822 patients included in this study: 170 patients (9%) developed an infection that required treatment, 62 patients (3%) received nonoperative treatment with oral or intravenous antibiotics, and 108 patients (6%) underwent subsequent surgery in addition to antibiotic therapy. Random forest algorithms identified 7 variables that were relevant for predicting infection: (1) Gustilo-Anderson or Tscherne classification, (2) bone loss, (3) mechanism of injury, (4) multitrauma, (5) AO/OTA fracture classification, (6) age, and (7) fracture location. Training of the penalized logistic regression algorithm resulted in the best-performing prediction model, with AUC, calibration slope, calibration intercept, and Brier scores of 0.75, 0.94, 0.00, and 0.076, respectively, in the derivation cohort and 0.81, 1.07, 0.09, and 0.079, respectively, in the validation cohort. We developed an ML prediction model that can estimate the probability of infection for individual patients with TSFs based on patient and fracture characteristics that are readily available at hospital admission. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Metabolic Shock in Elderly Pertrochanteric or Intertrochanteric Surgery. Comparison of Three Surgical Methods. Is there a Much Safer?

IntroductionTrochanteric fractures are a major trauma in the elderly population and represent a significant part of public health spending. Various fixation devices are used as treatment for these fractures. This study aimed to evaluate three surgical methods in the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures.Materials and methodsFrom January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, 86 patients were divided into 3 groups. Fifteen patients were treated with osteosynthesis by reamed intramedullary nailing (RIMN), 15 patients were treated with unreamed intramedullary nailing (UIMN), and 13 patients were treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) plate osteosynthesis. All patients were >75 years of age. They were evaluated with a clinical radiological follow-up and laboratory examination (LDH, CPK, IL-1-B, IL-8, TNF-α, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, D-dimer, fibrinogen, ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin).ResultsIL-8, TNF-α, fibrinogen, D-dimer and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein levels were higher in the DHS group compared with the other two groups at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). LDH, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels were higher in the DHS group compared with the other two groups at 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). From 3 to 6 months after surgery, the TNF-α level was high in the DHS and RIMN groups (P<0.05). Infection markers did not demonstrate a difference among the 3 groups. Twelve patients died during the 12-month follow-up. Regardless of the method used, morbidity and mortality are linked to enticement and comorbidities rather than surgery within 48 hours after the trauma.ConclusionsFrom our study, we can affirm that the values of cytokines and interleukins observed remain high during the 12-month follow up, regardless of whatever fixation devices or surgery type was performed within 48 hours of injury. Inflammatory markers are higher in patients in the DHS group. This can probably be explained by the fact that DHS technique is performed by open surgery, and this can create a higher inflammation of soft tissue. Mortality is reduced in the first 30 days after surgery if patients are mobilized early. Therefore, mortality in our study population of patients aged >75 years is linked more to the chronic inflammatory state and comorbidities, rather than fixation device or surgical type used.However, future studies are needed to answer further questions that go beyond the scope of our study.

Influence of reaming intramedullary nailing on MSC population after surgical treatment of patients with long bone fracture.

Reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN) is a surgical method of choice for treatment of diaphyseal fractures. This procedure affects the biological environment of bone tissue locally and systemically. This study investigated the influence of RIN on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with long bone fractures. The axis of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)/stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) was selected since it is considered as major pathway for MSC homing and migration. Iliac crest bone marrow (IC-BM) samples and blood samples were collected at two different time points. One sample was collected before the RIN (BN) and the other immediately after RIN (AN). BM-MSCs were cultured and RT-qPCR was performed for CXCR4 mRNA levels and ELISA for the SDF-1 sera levels. The experimental study revealed that there was a correlation between the increase of SDF-1 levels in peripheral blood and a decrease in the levels of CXCR4 in MSCs in the IC-BM following RIN. The levels of SDF-1 showed a significant increase in the sera of patients after RIN. In conclusion, the present study is the first providing evidence of the effects of RIN on MSC population via the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis. The levels of serum SDF-1 factor were elevated after RIN while increased levels of SDF-1 in peripheral blood were inversely correlated with the mRNA levels of CXCR4 on BM-MSCs after RIN. Therefore, this study contributes to enlighten the systematic effects of RIN on the population of MSCs at a cellular level.

A Study on Change in ESR among Patients Undergoing Reamed Intramedullary Nailing At a Tertiary Care Hospital

An erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a type of blood test that measures how quickly erythrocytes (red blood cells) settle at the bottom of a test tube that contains a blood sample. Normally, red blood cells settle relatively slowly. A faster-than-normal rate may indicate inflammation in the body. Forty patients (32 males; 8 females; mean age, 43.1 (range, 20–97) years) who sustained isolated closed diaphyseal fracture of the femur or the tibia remained in the study group. All femoral fractures and tibial fractures were treated with an interlocking nail, with reamed technique. ESR in the study group was high during the preoperative period (average values of 42.8; P = 0.001), whereas there was a sharp rise to 66.8 (average value) postoperatively (P, 0.001), reaching the peak on the 3rd postoperative day (average value, 82.7; P, 0.001 in comparison to the preoperative mean value). ESR mean value returned near to POD 1 on the tenth postoperative day (65.5).

Association of Three-Month Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (RUST) with Nonunion in Tibial Shaft Fracture Patients.

ObjectivesNonunions of tibial shaft fractures have profound implications on patient quality of life and are associated with physical and mental suffering. Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (RUST) may serve as an important prognostic tool for identifying patients at a high risk of nonunion.DesignWe used data from the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) and Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) trials to explore the association of three-month RUST scores with nonunion in patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. We performed a retrospective cohort study nested within two multi-center, randomized controlled trials.ParticipantsThe patients included in the current study: (1) sustained a tibial shaft fracture and were enrolled in the SPRINT or FLOW randomized trials, (2) had initial operative management with intramedullary nailing, (3) showed radiographic evidence of an unhealed fracture at the three-month follow-up, and (4) their healing status (union or nonunion) was captured at 12-months postoperatively.InterventionMultivariable binary logistic regression was carried out to identify factors associated with nonunion, including open versus closed injury, fracture severity, fracture gap, and three-month RUST score. We determined the concordance statistic (c statistic) for our regression model both with and without the RUST score.Outcome Measurements and ResultsOf the 155 tibial fracture patients with complete data available for analysis, the overall rate of nonunion at 12 months was 30% (n=47). The mean three-month RUST score in patients with nonunion at 12 months was 4.8 (standard deviation (SD) 1.1) as compared to 6.3 (SD 1.7) for those healed at 12 months. In our multivariable regression analysis, open fractures conferred five-fold greater odds of nonunion at 12 months as compared to closed fractures (odds ratio (OR) 4.76, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.71-13.30). Further, three-month RUST scores of 4 and 5-6 were associated with a 47% (95% CI: 18%-73%) and 23% (4.5-51.5%) absolute risk increase of nonunion as compared to a score of ≥ 7, respectively. The addition of RUST scores to our adjusted regression model improved the c statistic from 0.70 (95%CI: 0.61-0.79) to 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74-0.88).ConclusionA third of patients with tibial shaft fractures who have failed to heal by three months will show nonunion at one year. Open fractures and lower three-month RUST scores are strongly associated with a higher risk of nonunion at one year. Further research is needed to establish whether prognosis in this high-risk group can be modified.

Nonunion in Patients with Tibial Shaft Fractures: Is Early Physical Status Associated with Fracture Healing?

BackgroundNonunions of tibial shaft fractures have devastating physical and psychological consequences for patients. It remains unknown if early functional status can identify patients at risk for nonunion.Questions/PurposesTo determine if functional status at three months after surgery, as measured by either the short form 36 (SF-36) or the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey physical component summary (SF-12 PCS) score, can serve as a prognostic indicator for nonunion at one year in patients with fractures of the tibial shaft.Patients/MethodsThis study was an observational cohort study nested within two multicenter, randomized controlled trials. Patients who met the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) sustained a tibial shaft fracture that was treated with intramedullary nailing, (2) were unhealed at the three-month follow-up, (3) had a reported SF-36 or SF-12 PCS score at three months, (4) had the final 12-month follow-up with a reported radiographic healing status (bone union or nonunion), and (5) were enrolled in either the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Shaft Fractures (SPRINT) or Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) randomized trials. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between healing status at 12 months and seven prognostic variables (open fracture, fracture pattern, nailing technique, smoking, fracture gap, three-month PCS score, and FLOW vs. SPRINT trial).ResultsA total of 940 patients were included in this study with an overall rate of radiographic nonunion of 13.3% (n=125) at the 12-month follow-up. Absolute nonunion risk increased with incrementally lower PCS scores (8.2%, 12.8%, 15.9%, 23.7% for scores ≥ 40, 30.0-39.99, 20.0-29.99, and < 20, respectively). In the multivariable regression analysis, PCS scores of < 20 were associated with a 2.6-times greater odds and 10% absolute risk increase of non-union, as compared to scores of ≥ 40 (OR 2.58, 95%CI: 1.02-6.53, ARI: 10.3, 95% CI: 0.1 - 28.2), whereas scores between 20 and 30 were associated with a nearly two-times greater odds of nonunion and a 6.4% absolute risk increase of nonunion (OR 1.94, 95%CI: 1.08-3.49, ARI: 6.4, 95% CI 0.6 - 15.3). Open fractures also conferred a 2.8-fold increase in odds of nonunion as compared to closed injuries (OR 2.77, 95%CI: 1.58-4.83), as did complex fractures when compared to simple fractures (OR 2.57, 95%CI: 1.64-4.02).ConclusionA considerable portion of patients with fractures of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nailing will experience nonunion at one-year postoperatively. Nonunion can be accurately predicted by patient functional recovery at three months as measured by the PCS of the SF-36 and SF-12 instruments.

Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients.

Background: A tibia shaft fracture is one of the most common long bone fractures, with two general types, open fracture and close fracture. However, there is no universally accepted guideline suggesting which treatment to use under certain circumstances. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and to provide more credible data-based medical guidelines.Methods: Available literature was identified by searching medical databases with relevant key terms. Studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline, intervention, and the outcome of treatments, were extracted. A comparative connection of these studies was demonstrated through net plots. Continuous variables and binary variables were reported as mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI), respectively. The comparison of direct and indirect outcome and their P-value were listed in the node-splitting table. Treatments for each endpoint were ranked by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. A heat plot was created to illustrate the contribution of raw data and the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons.Results: According to the search strategy, 697 publications were identified, and 25 records were included, involving 3,032 patients with tibia shaft fractures. Seven common surgical or non-surgical treatments, including reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN), un-reamed intramedullary nailing (UIN), minimally reamed intramedullary nailing (MIN), ender nailing (EN), external fixation (EF), plate, and cast, were compared, in terms of time to union, reoperation, non-union, malunion, infection and implant failure. Plate performed relatively better for time to union, while cast might be the best choice in close cases to reduce the risks of reoperation, non-union, malunion, and infection. To prevent implant failure, EN seemed to be better.Conclusion: Cast might have the highest probability of the most optimal choice for tibia shaft fracture in close cases, while reamed intramedullary nailing ranked second.

Tibial Fracture Nonunion and Time to Healing After Reamed Intramedullary Nailing: Risk Factors Based on a Single-Center Review of 1003 Patients.

To determine factors associated with nonunion of adult tibial fractures. Retrospective review with data collection for logistic regression and survival analysis. Scottish Level I trauma center, 1985-2007. During this period, 1590 adult tibial fractures were treated by reamed nailing and 1003 fractures met all inclusion criteria for the chosen analysis. Reamed intramedullary nailing. Record of nonunion diagnosis and final union time with characteristics, including age, gender, closed or open injury, OTA/AO classification, Gustilo classification, fasciotomy, infection, polytrauma, smoking, and injury severity score. The overall nonunion rate was 12%, and median time to healing was 18 weeks. Age significantly influenced nonunion, with middle-aged patients at highest risk. Both fracture type (closed/open) and morphology (OTA/AO classification) significantly influenced nonunion risk and time to union. Among closed injuries, the highest nonunion rate was for OTA/AO type B fractures (15%). Among open injuries, the highest nonunion rate was for OTA/AO type C (61%). Both compartment syndrome and smoking did not significantly influence nonunion risk but did significantly extend time to union. Injury characteristics including fracture morphology and severity of soft tissue injury were strong predictors of compromised fracture healing. Age also influenced nonunion risk in an unexpected way, with highest rates in the middle decades of adulthood. Future studies should consider the possibility of similar age-related effects and clinical studies should seek to identify explanations for why this may arise, including both physiological and socio-behavioral factors. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis has equal safety to reamed intramedullary nails in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures

ObjectivesThe best fixation method for open tibial fractures has long been a matter of debate, many studies have recommended the use of intramedullary nails over external fixation for treating such fractures, recent studies also showed favorable results for the use of plates in managing open tibial fractures. However, there are very few (if any) reports in the literature comparing the use of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis to reamed intramedullary nails in the fixation of open tibial fractures.The aim of this study was to compare the safety & efficiency of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis to reamed intramedullary nails in treating open tibial shaft fractures. DesignA single-center, parallel group, prospective, randomized study. SettingAcademic Level 1 Trauma Center, during the period from October 2014 to December 2016. PatientsA total of 60 patients with open tibial fractures were randomized to reamed intra-medullary nails (R-IMN) (group A) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) (group B). Outcome measurementPatients were assessed for union (clinical & radiographic) & complications (e.g.; non–union, infection). ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the 2 methods in term of the incidence of infection or non-union. Time to full union was shorter for the R-IMN group when compared to that of the MIPO group & that was found to be statistically significant. ConclusionMIPO technique has equal safety to R-IMN technique in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures, as both techniques have similar rate of infection & non-union. These findings suggest that the MIPO technique can be considered a valid treatment alternative for such fractures. Level of evidenceLevel II, Therapeutic study.

Does Participation in a Randomized Clinical Trial Change Outcomes? An Evaluation of Patients Not Enrolled in the SPRINT Trial.

To determine the extent to which knowledge from clinical trial protocols is transferred to nonparticipating patients. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial. Six level-1 international trauma centers. We compared rates and timing of reoperation in a subset of patients enrolled in the Study to Prospectively evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) to concurrent patients who were eligible but not enrolled. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected trial data. The records of 6 of the original SPRINT centers were searched for non-SPRINT patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of a closed tibial fracture. The rate and timing of reoperation were compared. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. One hundred fourteen non-SPRINT patients were compared with 328 patients enrolled in SPRINT from those same sites. There were 7 reoperations (6.1%) in non-SPRINT patients versus 18 (5.2%) in SPRINT patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 3.13; P = 0.811]. There was no difference in the time to reoperation between the SPRINT and non-SPRINT patients (6.2 vs. 6.8 months, 95% CI of the difference -3.8 to 2.6; P = 0.685) or in the proportion of patients who underwent reoperation before 6 months (29% vs. 43%; OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.18 to 15.41; P = 0.647). Patients not enrolled in SPRINT had similarly low rates of reoperation for nonunion, and the average time to reoperation for both groups was longer than 6 months. A 6-month waiting period may have allowed slow-to-heal fractures adequate time to heal, thereby reducing the rate of diagnosis of nonunion. As such, this waiting period could contribute to lower-than-expected reoperation rates for nonunion. It is possible that clinical trials may beneficially influence the care of nonenrolled patients.

Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

We sought to determine the effect of reaming on 1-year 36-item short-form general health survey (SF-36) and short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA) scores from the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in patients with Tibial Fractures. Prospective randomized controlled trial.1319 patients were randomized to reamed or unreamed nails. Fractures were categorized as open or closed. Twenty-nine academic and community health centers across the US, Canada, and the Netherlands. One thousand three hundred and nineteen skeletally mature patients with closed and open diaphyseal tibia fractures. Reamed versus unreamed tibial nails. SF-36 and the SMFA. Outcomes were obtained during the initial hospitalization to reflect preinjury status, and again at the 2-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Repeated measures analyses were performed with P < 0.05 considered significant. There were no differences between the reamed and unreamed groups at 12 months for either the SF-36 physical component score [42.9 vs. 43.4, P = 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval for the difference (CI) -2.1 to 1.1] or the SMFA dysfunction index (18.0 vs. 17.6, P = 0.79. 95% CI, -2.2 to 2.9). At one year, functional outcomes were significantly below baseline for the SF-36 physical componentf score, SMFA dysfunction index, and SMFA bothersome index (P < 0.001). Time and fracture type were significantly associated with functional outcome. Reaming does not affect functional outcomes after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures. Patients with open fractures have worse functional outcomes than those with a closed injury. Patients do not reach their baseline function by 1 year after surgery. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.