SEER,Vol. 83, No.4, October 2005 Realist Aesthetics in NineteenthCentury Russian Art Writing CAROLADLAM I 'REALISM' is among the most frequentlyinvoked critical categories in accounts of nineteenth-centuryRussian culturalactivity, particularly, of course, in the literaryfield. In many accounts of Russian painting, too, 'realism'is widely understoodas a definitivemoment in the entire historyof Russian art. It is commonly associatedwith the secession of fourteen students from the St PetersburgImperialAcademy of Art.in i863 in protest at a lack of freedom of choice concerning the subject matter for that year's prestigiousGreat Gold Medal competition, and their subsequent formation of the Artel' svobodnykh khudozhnikov (Free Artists' Workshop), as well as with the Moscow-based Tovarishchestvoperedvizhnykhvystavokproizvedenii russkikhkhudozhnikov (Associationof Itinerant Exhibitions), establishedin I870, whose members included such renowned and influential artists as Ivan Kramskoi, Isaak Levitan, Il'ia Repin, Valentin Serov, and Vasilii Surikov,among many others.In many instancesthe role of 'realism'in Russian art history is fraught with particular significance not just as aesthetic response to a flagging and supposedly derivative classicist aestheticsystembut, firstand foremost,as symbolof Russia'stransition fromfeudalautocracyto modern state. This articleseeksto acknowledgethehistoriographicalcircumstances of this perception of realism in Russian art, as well as to refine and expand our understanding of the emergence and application of 'realism' in Russian art (particularlypainting) by exploring the prehistory of the concept in contemporaneous written art criticism between the mid-eighteenth century and the I87os. To this encl I examine the developmentinpublictextualdiscourseof a setofconcepts that might be said to be cognates of 'realism',insofaras they concern technical and aesthetic issues of visual figurativerepresentation,such as the constitutionof natureand the 'real',the role of copying, and the renderingof detail. Such (necessarilyselective)elements comprisepart of a history of 'proto-realist'thought in Russia itself a significant Carol Adlam is Lecturer in Russian and Head of the Department of Russian at the University of Exeter. CAROL ADLAM 639 component of a far larger exploration of understandingsof the visual in pre-revolutionaryRussianculturethatremainsto be written. The history of such 'proto-realist'visual concepts has been largely obscuredby a numberoffactors, some ofwhich maybroadlybe termed 'historiographic'. The idea that 'realism' constituted an unrivalled visual expressionof the acutely contested liberal-democraticpolitics of the era from the time of the accession of the 'reformist'tsarAlexander II in I855 may be at leastin part attributedto Russia'smost influential nineteenth-centurycriticVladimirStasov(i 824- I906), and in particular his magnum opusof I89I, a retrospective survey of Russian art entitledDvadtsat' piat'letrusskogo iskusstva (TwentyFiveYearsof Russian Art). In this work Stasov consistentlyapplied the term 'realism'to the works he had earlier preferred, with some occasional exceptions, to describeas 'naturalist',noting that 'realism'and 'nationalism'were the two defining features of the 'new' art in the post-Nicholas era.' Thus for Stasovin i 882, 'realism'was the quintessentiallyRussian,emphatically 'national'artthat appearedonce Alexanderhad (asStasovputs it in his characteristicallyflamboyant idiom) 'lifted the tombstone from the sepulchrein which Russialay buried alive', while Russianworksof art before I855, with the exception of Pavel Fedotov's,were the mere 'huts' to the 'real palace and temple of the future national Russian museum' that was the new art.2In earlier writings, however, Stasov rarelyusedthe term'realist',preferringinsteadto speakof the 'new art' or the 'nationalschool'. This is despitethe factthat all Stasov'swritings on art post-date the appearance of Gustave Courbet's 'Realist Manifesto ' in i855, and his travels abroad exposed him to this movement (witnesshis tripto the WorldExhibitionin i 862).3 Stasov'sretrospectiveapplicationof the term in Dvadtsat' piat'letwas in fact an indicator of the specificchallenge faced in the artisticworld by the last two decades of the nineteenth centuryby the emergence of the programmaticallyapoliticalartistswho, mutatis mutandis, viewed the 'mutineers' of the i86os and I87os as ideologically and aesthetically 1 Vladimir Stasov, 'Dvadtsat' piat' let russkogo iskusstva. Nasha zhivopis'. Nasha skul'ptura. Nasha arkhitektura. Nasha muzyka' [I882-83], in V. V. Stasov, Izbrannye sochineniia v trekhtomakh,vol. 3, ed. P. T. Shipunov, Moscow, 1952, pp. 391-568 (p. 415) (hereafter, Stasov, vol. 3). 2 Ibid., p. 392. 3 For example, Stasov discusses genre painting but not realism in art even when he advocates the depiction of 'scenes of everyday life', in his defence of Dutch and Belgian genre painting, or in his attacks on the 'advocates...
Read full abstract