Real-world Treatment Sequencing Research Articles

Overall Survival Associated with Real-World Treatment Sequences in Patients with CLL/SLL in the United States

Overall Survival Associated with Real-World Treatment Sequences in Patients with CLL/SLL in the United States

Real-World Treatment Sequencing, Attrition Rates, and Survival Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study over Four Decades

Real-World Treatment Sequencing, Attrition Rates, and Survival Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study over Four Decades

Real-world treatment sequencing and effectiveness of second- and third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionWith multiple targeted therapies approved for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is increasingly important to understand outcomes with various sequences of next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We describe contemporary sequencing patterns and treatment effectiveness of first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) treatments in patients who received second-generation ALK TKIs in the 1L treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC in the United States. MethodsA cohort of adults with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who initiated treatment with 1L alectinib or brigatinib between June 2017 and April 2021 in the Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived de-identified database were followed through April 2023. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in 1L and 2L, TTD on 1L plus 2L sequential therapy (TTD2), and total time on sequential ALK TKI therapy (including beyond 2L) were evaluated. ResultsPatients (N=273) were followed up for a median duration of 28.9 months. Among patients who discontinued 1L therapy, 22% died after 1L discontinuation (median time from discontinuation to death, 4.0 months) without receiving 2L therapy. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) TTD was 21.9 (15.2–25.8) and 7.3 (5.3–10.2) months in 1L and 2L, respectively. Median (95% CI) TTD2 was 29.4 (25.1–36.1) months and total time on sequential ALK TKI treatment was 28.0 (23.6–32.9) months. ConclusionsIn this large real-world study, TTD2 and the total time on sequential ALK TKIs was approximately 2.5 years. The high attrition rate from 1L to 2L and the longest clinical benefit observed with 1L therapy support using the drug with the longest 1L effectiveness up front in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Real-world Treatment Sequencing and Outcomes With Cabozantinib After First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combination Therapy For Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: CARINA Study Results

IntroductionReal-world data are limited on treatment sequencing and outcomes after first-line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combination treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Patients and MethodsIn this real-world, UK-based, retrospective study (CARINA; NCT04957160), data were obtained from hospital and electronic prescribing records. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years at aRCC diagnosis and had received 1L CPI–CPI or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)–CPI combination therapy before second-line (2L) therapy including cabozantinib. We describe treatment outcomes including 1L and 2L durations of treatment (DoT) and overall survival (OS). ResultsData from April 2015 to June 2022 were collected on 281 patients from nine UK centres. Median 1L DoT was 2.3 months for CPI–CPI therapy (n = 171) and 5.0 months for TKI–CPI therapy (n = 58). After 1L CPI–CPI or TKI–CPI therapy, median 2L DoT was 5.8 versus 4.2 months, respectively, for cabozantinib (n = 163), and 3.8 versus 2.4 months for other therapies (n = 118); median 2L OS was 15.2 and 15.3 months, respectively, for cabozantinib, and 14.6 and 24.2 months for other therapies. ConclusionDoT for 2L treatment was numerically better for cabozantinib than for other therapies, and after 1L CPI–CPI therapy than after 1L TKI–CPI therapy. Median OS was similar for 2L cabozantinib and other 2L therapies, and median OS for 2L cabozantinib was similar after both 1L therapy types. These results demonstrate the antitumour effect of 2L therapies, including cabozantinib, after 1L CPI-based combination treatment, regardless of whether 1L CPI–CPI or TKI–CPI therapy is used.

Treatment trajectories and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: a tertiary single-centre experience.

There is an increasing diversification in the treatment landscape for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) leading to therapeutic challenges that can only incompletely be covered by prospective randomized double-blind trials. Real-world observations are therefore an important tool to provide insights into therapeutic strategies. To describe the real-world treatment algorithms in an IBD referral centre. Single-centre retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data on treatment sequences and outcomes from 502 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab at a large German tertiary referral centre. Treatment decisions correlated to baseline patient characteristics. Over time, infliximab continued to be the preferred first-line option in CD and UC, although ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively, became increasingly important choices. Remission rates decreased with the advancement of therapy lines. We provide insights into the evolution of tertiary centre real-world treatment sequences that might - together with other observations - help to guide the selection of therapies in IBD. Our data also strongly underscore the unmet need for biomarkers supporting treatment decisions. None.

Impact of Real-World Treatment Sequencing Patterns on Time to Next Treatment among Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the United States

Background: The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is evolving at a rapid pace, with development of several targeted therapies. The real-world applicability of clinical trial effectiveness is markedly influenced by treatment choices, the specific characteristics of patients' diseases, their overall health, and individual preferences. However, there is limited evidence to understand the impact of multiple treatment options on real-world effectiveness in CLL in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize recent real-world treatment sequencing patterns and associated time to next treatment among patients with CLL in the United States. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with CLL (≥18 years at diagnosis) from January 1, 2018, through January 1, 2023, who received ≥1 treatment after initial diagnosis. Patients were sourced from the ConcertAI RWD360 dataset, a real-world de-identified dataset >6 million patients from across the United States derived from various electronic health record systems and integrated with a large administrative open claims dataset. Patients were followed through the end of the record or death, whichever occurred first. Patients were classified into the following treatment categories: chemotherapy (including bendamustine-based and other chemotherapy), anti-CD20-based, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib), and venetoclax-based therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment sequencing pattern, and time to next treatment were examined across lines of therapy for each treatment category. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to next treatment. Results: The study included 3,431 patients with CLL (median age: 69 years; male: 63.8%). There was a significant variation in average age among the 4 treatment groups ( P<0.0001). Compared with the overall population, patients who received anti-CD20-based therapy were slightly older (median age: 71 years), while patients who received venetoclax-based therapy were relatively younger (median age: 67 years). Patients were primarily treated in community rather than academic settings (76.4% vs 21.3%). First-line patients were most commonly treated with BTKi (60.1%), venetoclax (16.0%), and anti-CD20 (15.4%) regimens. Among patients who initiated BTKi therapies, zanubrutinib use (2.6%) was limited; this may be due to the recent approval date (January 2023). Among CLL patients, 35.0% received second-line treatment and BTKi stayed dominant (35.7%), followed by anti-CD20 (29.6%) and venetoclax (25.8%) therapies. From first- to second-line therapy, the prevailing sequencing pattern was from either one BTKi to another BTKi (23.5%), venetoclax to anti-CD20 (13.2%), or BTKi to an anti-CD20 (9.7%). From second- to third-line therapy, patients most frequently switched from anti-CD20 to venetoclax (24.6%), anti-CD20 to BTKi (13.3%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (12.6%). From third- to fourth-line therapy, the predominant sequencing pattern was from venetoclax to anti-CD20 (21.3%), anti-CD20 back to venetoclax (20.6%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (11.6%). Median time to next treatment in first line was significantly longest for patients receiving BTKi (53.9 months) and shortest for patients treated with venetoclax (7.7 months) ( P<0.0001) (Figure 1). Median time to next treatment in second line was not reached among patients using BTKi, while it was significantly shorter for those on venetoclax and anti-CD20 (10.4 months and 1.5 months, respectively; P<0.0001) (Figure 2). Conclusions: This studydemonstrated unique treatment sequencing patterns among patients with CLL in the real-world setting.As the most commonly used regimen, BTKi therapy was shown to have significantly improved time to next treatment compared with other treatment regimens in first and second lines of therapies. Future studies with extended follow-up are needed to allow for assessment of newer treatments and enable evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes.

Real-World Patterns of Targeted Therapy Use in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma in the United States: A Longitudinal Study

Introduction: Clinical guidelines and practice have shifted toward increasing use of novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) or B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (BCL2i) for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). To highlight recent changes in clinical practice, this study evaluated real-world treatment sequences, with a focus on sequential novel targeted therapy, among patients with CLL/SLL in the US over time. Methods: Adult patients with ≥2 medical claims for CLL/SLL diagnosis on distinct days and ≥1 claim for CLL/SLL therapy were identified in the Optum Clinformatics DataMart database (2014-2021). The index date was the date of initiation of the first observed line of therapy (LOT) following the first observed CLL/SLL diagnosis. The observation period spanned from index to the earliest of end of eligibility, data availability, or death. LOTs were identified using a claims-based algorithm adapted from published literature during the observation period. Each LOT spanned from the initiation of a new agent to discontinuation of all agents in the LOT (i.e., 90-day gap without any dispensing), a switch to another agent, or the addition of a new agent. The proportion of patients receiving sequential targeted therapy in the first 2 LOTs (i.e., BTKi/BCL2i as first-line [1L] and second-line [2L] treatments in any order) was described. For sequential BTKi in 1L and 2L, treatments were also described by agent (i.e., ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and combinations thereof). To assess longitudinal patterns, Sankey plots were created for 2 temporal data cohorts: patients with a 1L in 2014-2017 and patients with a 1L in 2018-2021. Results: We identified 7,146 eligible patients, 40.6% female, median age 73 years, with a median follow-up of 2 years after 1L initiation. The most common 1L treatment was BTKi (36.8%), then chemoimmunotherapy (CIT; 27.4%), CD20 (22.2%), chemotherapy (7.6%), and BCL2i (5.4%). In the first 2 LOTs, 22.3% of patients had sequential targeted therapy, comprising 70.0% BTKi→BTKi (i.e., BTKi retreated), 23.8% BTKi→BCL2i, 3.6% BCL2i→BCL2i, and 2.6% BCL2i→BTKi. The most common BTKi sequences by agent were ibrutinib→ibrutinib (61.6%) and ibrutinib→acalabrutinib (28.4%). Among patients with a 1L in 2014-2017 (N=2,612; median follow-up=3 years; Figure A), the most common 1L treatment class was CIT (44.6%), followed by CD20 (25.2%), BTKi (21.7%), chemotherapy (7.6%), and BCL2i (0.3%). For those receiving a 2L treatment (N=905), the 3 most common treatment classes were BTKi (37.6%), CD20 (30.2%), and CIT (17.2%). The proportion of patients receiving sequential targeted therapy in the first 2 LOTs was 11.2%; among these patients, 80.2% had BTKi→BTKi; 17.8% had BTKi→BCL2i; 2.0% had BCL2i→BCL2i; and 0% had BCL2i→BTKi. The most common BTKi sequences by agent were ibrutinib→ibrutinib (81.5%) and ibrutinib→acalabrutinib (17.3%). Among patients with a 1L in 2018-2021 (N=4,534; median follow-up=1 year; Figure B), the most common 1L treatment class was BTKi (45.5%), followed by CD20 (20.4%), CIT (17.5%), BCL2i (8.3%), and chemotherapy (7.6%). For 2L (N=833), the 3 most common treatment classes were BTKi (40.9%), CD20 (24.4%), and BCL2i (14.9%). The proportion of patients receiving sequential targeted therapy in the first 2 LOTs was 34.3%, comprising 66.4% BTKi→BTKi; 25.9% BTKi→BCL2i; 4.2% BCL2i→BCL2i; and 3.5% BCL2i→BTKi). Among those receiving sequential BTKi, the most common sequences by agent were ibrutinib→ibrutinib (53.2%), ibrutinib→acalabrutinib (33.2%), and acalabrutinib→acalabrutinib (5.3%). Conclusions: This longitudinal real-world study found a substantial increase in patients with CLL/SLL receiving targeted therapies in 1L over time. In particular, the proportion receiving BTKi in 1L doubled in 2018-2021 relative to 2014-2017 and accounted for almost half of the recent 1L CLL/SLL initiations. A third of patients with 1L observed in 2018-2021 also received a targeted agent in 2L, relative to about 1 in 10 patients in 2014-2017, with BTKi→BTKi being the most common sequence. Surprisingly, patients who received a BTKi in 1L were more likely to receive a BTKi in 2L than they were to switch to a BCL2i. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes to determine optimal sequences for CLL/SLL as well as the reasons for re-treatment with BTKi.

Real world treatment sequences and outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma changed a lot in the last few years. This study aimed to assess the treatment sequences and outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting. We enrolled patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomawho received first-line systemic treatment with tyrosin kinase inhibitors monotherapy, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, or pembrolizumab plus axitinibbetween January2009 and May 2023 on the database of TriNetX network. Overall survival, time on treatment and time to next treatment were evaluated using Kaplan-Meiermethod. Totally, 4183 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy, 1555 received ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 559 received axitinib plus pembrolizumab. Median time on treatment was 2.5 months for the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, 5.4 months for the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort, and 8.3 months for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. Median time to next treatment was 16.6 months for both the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy and ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohorts, and 22.1 months for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. Median overall survival was 42.2 months for the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, 39.7monthsfor the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort, and not reached for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. In comparison with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, patients in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort showed survival benefit (log-rank p = 0.0168) in overall survival, but not the case in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort. There was a trend toward using first-line immuno-oncology based therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world practice. Axitinib plus pembrolizumuab cohort had survival benefits over tyrosine kinase inhibitor and ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohorts, while patients in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort had more distant metastases and comorbidities.

Real-world treatment sequencing and outcomes for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib after first-line checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy: Results from the CARINA study.

e16512 Background: Real-world data are required to guide the optimal sequencing of therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) when first-line (1L) checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combinations are used. CARINA is a retrospective, non-interventional study of treatment sequencing and outcomes in patients with aRCC who progressed to second-line (2L) treatment after 1L CPI-based combination therapy. Methods: Electronic prescribing records and hospital medical records from nine participating UK specialist centers were reviewed to identify patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of aRCC who received 2L therapy after 1L CPI-based combination therapy in line with UK National Health Service funding policy. The primary objective was to describe the treatment pathways of patients with aRCC who received 1L CPI-based combination and subsequent therapy. Secondary objectives included descriptive analysis of: duration of treatment (DoT), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here we report a descriptive analysis of outcomes for subgroups who received 2L cabozantinib or other 2L therapies. Results: Between April 2015 and June 2022, data were collected from 281 patients (163 patients received 2L cabozantinib and 118 received other 2L therapies after 1L CPI-based therapy). Overall, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at aRCC diagnosis was 59.4 (10.1) years, 76.5% were male and 87.5% had clear-cell aRCC (including those with a clear-cell component). In the 2L cabozantinib and other 2L therapies subgroups, the most common 1L regimens were ipilimumab + nivolumab (79.1% and 60.2%, respectively), axitinib + avelumab (9.8% and 22.0%) and pembrolizumab + axitinib (9.8% and 9.3%). Outcomes of 2L treatment for the 2L cabozantinib and other 2L therapies subgroups are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Among patients with aRCC who progressed to 2L treatment after 1L CPI-based therapy, the most common 1L therapies were ipilimumab + nivolumab followed by axitinib + avelumab. DoT and ORR were numerically better with 2L cabozantinib than with other 2L therapies, demonstrating the antitumor effect of 2L cabozantinib after 1L CPI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04957160 . [Table: see text]

CARINA interim analysis: A non-interventional study of real-world treatment sequencing and outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma initiated on first-line checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy.

626 Background: First-line (1L) checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combinations have become standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Data are required to inform optimal sequencing of aRCC therapies. CARINA is a non-interventional study of treatment sequencing and outcomes in patients with aRCC initiated on 1L CPI-based combination therapy. We report the results of a pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: We reviewed electronic prescribing records from participating UK specialist centers to identify patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with aRCC who received 2L therapy after 1L CPI-based combination therapy. The primary objective was to determine the treatment pathway for patients with aRCC who initiated treatment with a CPI-based combination and received subsequent therapy. Secondary objectives included treatment duration and objective response rate (ORR). Outcomes were evaluated for all patients (enrolled population [EP]) and for the patient subgroup who received 2L cabozantinib. Results: In total, 129 patients were eligible for inclusion in this interim analysis of the EP (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.0 [9.9] years; 75.2% male; 77.3% clear-cell aRCC). Of these patients, 82.9% received 1L ipilimumab + nivolumab (Ipi + Nivo, n = 107) and 17.1% received axitinib + avelumab (Axi + Ave, n = 22); median (95% CI) duration of 1L treatment was 10.2 (9.1–17.1) weeks, ORR was 18.4%. The most commonly prescribed 2L therapies after Ipi + Nivo were cabozantinib (74.8%) and sunitinib (13.1%); the most commonly prescribed 2L therapies after Axi + Ave were lenvatinib + everolimus (45.5%) and cabozantinib (31.8%). Median (95% CI) duration of all 2L therapies was 23.6 (14.0–28.3) weeks, and median duration of 2L cabozantinib was 28.1 (20.1–37.1) weeks. ORR to 2L therapy was 30.4% for the EP, and 38.8% for the subgroup of patients who received 2L cabozantinib. Conclusions: In this interim analysis, the most commonly prescribed 2L therapies were cabozantinib and sunitinib after Ipi + Nivo, and lenvatinib + everolimus and cabozantinib after Axi + Ave. Antitumor response with 2L cabozantinib was observed after prior CPI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04957160 .

PP01.55 Real-World Treatment Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in ALK-Positive (ALK+) Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

PP01.55 Real-World Treatment Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in ALK-Positive (ALK+) Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Real-world clinical outcomes and cost estimates of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment: does sequencing of taxanes and androgen receptor-targeted agents matter?

ABSTRACT Introduction Health economic outcomes of real-world treatment sequencing of androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTA) and docetaxel (DOC) remain unclear. Material and Methods Data from the electronic Castration-resistant Prostate cancer Australian Database (ePAD) were analyzed including median overall survival (mOS) and median time-to-treatment failure (mTTF). Mean total costs (mTC) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of treatment sequences were estimated using the average sample method and Zhao and Tian estimator. Results Of 752 men, 441 received ARTA, 194 DOC, and 175 both sequentially. Of participants treated with both, first-line DOC followed by ARTA was the more common sequence (n = 125, 71%). mOS for first-line ARTA was 8.38 years (95% CI: 3.48, not-estimated) vs. 3.29 years (95% CI: 2.92, 4.02) for DOC. mTTF was 15.7 months (95% CI: 14.2, 23.7) for the ARTA-DOC sequence and 18.2 months (95% CI: 16.2, 23.2) for DOC-ARTA. In first-line, ARTA cost an additional $13,244 per mTTF month compared to DOC. In second-line, ARTA cost $6726 per mTTF month. The DOC-ARTA sequence saved $2139 per mTTF compared to ARTA-DOC, though not statistically significant. Conclusion ICERs show ARTA had improved clinical benefit compared to DOC but at higher cost. There were no significant cost differences between combined sequences.

Real-World Treatment Sequencing, Toxicities, Health Utilities, and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

ObjectivesThis real-world analysis describes treatment patterns, sequencing and clinical effectiveness, toxicities, and health utility outcomes in advanced-stage, incurable ALK-positive NSCLC patients across five different ALK-TKIs. Materials and MethodsClinicodemographic, treatment, and toxicity data were collected retrospectively in patients with advanced-stage ALK-positive NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Patient-reported symptoms, toxicities, and health utilities were collected prospectively. ResultsOf 148 ALK-positive NSCLC patients seen July 2009-May 2021, median age was 58.9 years; 84 (57%) were female; 112 (76%) never-smokers; 54 (47%) Asian and 40 (35%) white; 139 (94%) received at least one ALK-TKI: crizotinib (n = 74; 54%) and alectinib (n = 61; 44%) were administered mainly as first-line ALK-TKI, ceritinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib were administered primarily after previous ALK-TKI failure. Median overall survival (OS) was 54.0 months; 31 (21%) patients died within two years of advanced-stage diagnosis. Treatment modifications were observed in 35 (47%) patients with crizotinib, 19 (61%) with ceritinib, 41 (39%) with alectinib, 9 (41%) with brigatinib and 8 (30%) with lorlatinib. Prevalence of dose modifications and self-reported toxicities were higher with early versus later generation ALK-TKIs (P<.05). The presence of early treatment modification was not negatively associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS analyses. ConclusionSerial ALK-TKI sequencing approaches are viable therapeutic options that can extend quality of life and quantity-of-life, though a fifth of patients died within two years. No best single sequencing approach could be determined. Clinically relevant toxicities occurred across all ALK-TKIs. Treatment modifications due to toxicity may not necessarily compromise outcomes, allowing multiple approaches to deal with ALK-TKI toxicities.

Real-world Treatment Sequencing in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective, International, Observational Prostate Cancer Registry

BackgroundProstate cancer has a multifaceted treatment pattern. Evidence is lacking for optimal treatment sequences for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). ObjectiveTo increase the understanding of real-world treatment pathways and outcomes in patients with mCRPC. Design, setting, and participantsA prospective, noninterventional, real-world analysis of 3003 patients with mCRPC in the Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR; NCT02236637) from June 14, 2013 to July 9, 2018 was conducted. InterventionPatients received first- and second-line hormonal treatment and chemotherapy as follows: abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone)-docetaxel (ABI-DOCE), abiraterone-enzalutamide (ABI-ENZA), abiraterone–radium-223 (ABI-RAD), docetaxel-abiraterone (DOCE-ABI), docetaxel-cabazitaxel (DOCE-CABA), docetaxel-enzalutamide (DOCE-ENZA), and enzalutamide-docetaxel (ENZA-DOCE). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisBaseline patient characteristics, quality of life, mCRPC treatments, and efficacy outcomes (progression and survival) were presented descriptively. Results and limitationsData from 727 patients were eligible for the analysis (ABI-DOCE n = 178, ABI-ENZA n = 99, ABI-RAD n = 27, DOCE-ABI n = 191, DOCE-CABA n = 74, DOCE-ENZA n = 116, and ENZA-DOCE n = 42). Demographics and disease characteristics among patients between different sequences varied greatly. Most patients who started on abiraterone or enzalutamide stopped therapy because of disease progression. No randomisation to allow treatment/sequence comparisons limited this observational study. ConclusionsThe real-world PCR data complement clinical trial data, reflecting more highly selected patient populations than seen in routine clinical practice. Baseline characteristics play a role in mCRPC first-line treatment selection, but other factors, such as treatment availability, have an impact. Efficacy observations are limited and should be interpreted with caution. Patient summaryBaseline characteristics appear to have a role in the first-line treatment selection of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the real-world setting. First-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone seems to be the preferred treatment option for older patients and those with lower Gleason scores, first-line docetaxel for younger patients and those with more advanced disease, and first-line enzalutamide for patients with fewer metastases and more favourable performance status. The benefit to patients from these observations remains unknown.

Real-world treatment sequencing and survival in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy: a UK retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe CheckMate 025 trial established nivolumab monotherapy as one of the standards of care in previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, supporting real-world data is lacking. This study investigated characteristics, treatment sequences and clinical outcomes of patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated aRCC in the UK.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of aRCC patients treated with nivolumab at second line or later (2L +) at 4 UK oncology centres. Eligible patients commenced nivolumab (index date) between 01 March 2016 and 30 June 2018 (index period). Study data were extracted from medical records using an electronic case report form. Data cut-off (end of follow-up) was 31 May 2019.ResultsIn total, 151 patients were included with median follow-up of 15.2 months. Mean age was 66.9 years, male preponderance (72.2%), and mostly Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status grade 0–1 (71.5%). Amongst 112 patients with a known International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score, distribution between favourable, intermediate, and poor risk categories was 20.5%, 53.6%, and 25.9% respectively.The majority of patients (n = 109; 72.2%) received nivolumab at 2L, and these patients had a median overall survival (OS) of 23.0 months [95% confidence interval: 17.2, not reached]. All patients who received nivolumab at 2L had received TKIs at 1L. Amongst the 42 patients (27.8%) who received nivolumab in third line or later (3L +) the median OS was 12.4 months [95% CI: 8.8, 23.2]. The most common reasons for nivolumab discontinuation were disease progression (2L: 61.2%; 3L: 68.8%) and adverse events (2L: 34.7%; 3L: 28.1%).ConclusionThis study provides real-world evidence on the characteristics, treatment sequences, and outcomes of aRCC patients who received 2L + nivolumab monotherapy in the UK. Nivolumab-specific survival outcomes were similar to those achieved in the CheckMate 025 trial.

Real-World Data Analysis of Second-Line Antiangiogenic Targeted Treatments Following Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies and First-Line FOLFOX for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

IntroductionEvidence is lacking on second-line and later treatments for patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) who receive first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy. In this study, we explored the real-world treatment sequences, treatment duration, and factors associated with treatment sequences and durations in Japanese patients with CRC.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study used a Japanese administrative claims database (April 2008 to July 2021). Patients with confirmed CRC (presumed RAS wild-type) who received first-line FOLFOX (leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin) plus anti-EGFR therapy in or after May 2016, followed by second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus an antiangiogenic drug, were included. Treatment durations were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with treatment duration.ResultsAnalysis populations consisted of 1163 (first-line and second-line) and 645 (third-line) patients. At the start of first-line therapy, 67.8% of patients were male, the mean age was 64 years, 83.4% had left-sided CRC, and 84.3% were prescribed FOLFOX plus panitumumab. For second-line therapy, patients were prescribed bevacizumab (63%), ramucirumab (27%), or aflibercept beta (10%). Median (95% CI) treatment durations from the start of second-line therapy to the end of antitumor drug therapies were similar for bevacizumab (12.5 months [11.2, 14.0]), ramucirumab (12.5 months [11.2, 14.8]), and aflibercept beta (14.0 months [10.4, 17.0]). Treatment duration from second-line was positively associated with first-line treatment duration of 6 months or more, CRC surgery before starting first-line therapy, and liver surgery during first-line therapy, and was negatively associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before second-line therapy.ConclusionReal-world data revealed that all three antiangiogenic drugs were used as second-line therapy after first-line anti-EGFR antibodies and showed similar treatment durations.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02122-4.

Real-world treatment sequencing and healthcare costs among CLL/SLL patients treated with venetoclax

Objective This study aimed to describe treatment sequencing and healthcare costs among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) patients treated with venetoclax in a US managed care population. Methods CLL/SLL patients initiating venetoclax between 04/11/2016 and 06/30/2019 were selected from Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Costs per-patient-per-month were described during the first 60 days of venetoclax-based treatment (initiation phase) and subsequent post-initiation phase. Based on venetoclax prescribing information, clinical event-related costs were identified through claims for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) diagnosis, monitoring, prophylaxis, immunoglobulin treatment, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, renal impairment, hypertension, or cardiac arrhythmia. Statistical testing was not conducted due to small sample size. Results Twenty-five, 30, and 66 patients initiated venetoclax as their first observed regimen (1L), second observed regimen (2L), and third or later observed regimen (3L+), respectively. Most 2L (56.7%) and 3L+ (74.2%) venetoclax recipients previously received ibrutinib. Mean monthly all-cause costs during the initiation phase were $26,429 (1L cohort), $19,580 (2L cohort), and $23,918 (3L + cohort). Among the 2L cohort, mean monthly all-cause [clinical event-related] (including TLS) costs during initiation and post-initiation phases of venetoclax treatment were $15,506 [$6368] (initiation phase) and $14,318 [$5273] (post-initiation phase; median duration: 3.7 months) for patients receiving 1L ibrutinib, and $24,908 [$12,198] (initiation phase) and $16,905 [$7066] (post-initiation phase; median duration: 3.0 months) for patients not receiving 1L ibrutinib. Conclusions In this descriptive study, highest mean costs were observed during venetoclax initiation phase. Venetoclax patients previously receiving ibrutinib had lower mean total all-cause and clinical event-related (including TLS) costs during their venetoclax line of therapy than those previously receiving non-ibrutinib therapy.

Investigating real-world treatment sequencing outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer: A purple translational registry analysis.

386 Background: Current standard combination first line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Data on optimum treatment sequencing is also lacking. Methods: To assess whether first line (1L) treatment with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P)(SEQ1) or FOLFIRINOX (SEQ2) in the palliative treatment setting impacts survival outcomes, data for patients receiving palliative intent combination chemotherapy between 2016 and May 2020 was extracted from PURPLE, a prospective pancreatic cancer registry enrolling consecutive patients across multiple institutions. Results: Of 637 patients, 180 (28%) who received 1L single agent therapy and/or palliative radiotherapy were excluded. Of the remaining 449 patients, 132 (29%) had locally advanced disease (LA PDAC), 67 had local recurrence (15%), and 250 (56%) had de novo metastatic disease (mPDAC). Patients receiving 1L Gem/Nab-P (n=376, 84%) were older (median 67 vs 59 years, P&lt;0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI ≥2: 18% vs 3%, Odds Ratio [OR] 8.0, P=0.002), and poorer performance status (ECOG≥2: 10% vs 1%, OR 8.4, P=0.01) compared to the 1L FOLFIRINOX group (n=73, 16%). 140 (37%) patients receiving 1L Gem/Nab-P (SEQ1) and 32 (44%) patients receiving 1L FOLFIRINOX (SEQ2) received second line (2L) chemotherapy. SEQ1 2L regimens included FOLFIRINOX (n=14), FOLFIRI (n=49), FOLFOX (n=35) and 5FU alone (n=3). SEQ2 2L regimens included Gem/Nab-P (n=19), Gem/5FU (n=4), Gem/Cisplatin (n=1) and gemcitabine alone (n=5). Median progression free survival (mPFS) did not differ between patients receiving 1L Gem/Nab-P vs 1L FOLFIRINOX (5.7 vs 5.1 months, P=0.54); nor did median overall survival (mOS; 11.3 vs 12.3 months, P=0.37). In the subset of patients who went on to receive 2L chemotherapy, mPFS in 2L was shorter for SEQ1 compared to SEQ2 (2.9 vs 5.2 months, Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.3, P=0.03) but mOS did not differ (15.9 vs 17.3 months P=0.91). In the subset with LA PDAC, mPFS in 2L was comparable (2.9 vs 3.3 months, P=0.55) but mOS was significantly longer with SEQ1 (22.5 vs 13.8 months, HR 0.50, P=0.01). In mPDAC, mPFS in 2L was shorter with SEQ1 (2.3 vs 5.6 months, HR 1.64, P=0.03), but mOS did not differ by sequence (13 vs 17 months, P=0.23). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in survival outcomes between 1L choices of chemotherapy, despite patients offered 1L FOLFIRINOX (SEQ2) being younger and fitter. Survival differences observed for LA PDAC versus mPDAC will be further explored. Given the multiple potential confounders, randomised clinical trials are needed to make firmer conclusions regarding the optimal initial treatment for each patient subset.

Real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU)/costs associated with venetoclax treatment among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) patients.

e19354 Background: Ibrutinib (Ibr) is an established standard of care in CLL/SLL patients across lines, regardless of age, comorbidities and risk status. With the introduction of venetoclax (Ven) in the treatment landscape, there is a need to understand the real-world treatment sequencing of targeted oral agents, and the implication of sequencing on HRU/costs. This retrospective study evaluated HRU/costs associated with Ven treatment in various sequencing scenarios, including prior use of Ibr. Methods: Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart De-Identified Databases (4/11/2015-6/30/2019) were used to identify adults with CLL/SLL treated with Ven (excluding investigational combination therapies). The index date was the start of the first Ven-based line of therapy (index LOT) and the baseline period was the 12-month period pre-index. Mean all-cause HRU/costs per patient per month (PPPM) were calculated during the index LOT and the Ven ramp-up period (first 30 days post-index). Results: Among a total of 11,861 CLL/SLL patients receiving ≥1 LOT, 121 patients (1.0%) were treated with Ven, including 25 patients (64.0% single agent) using Ven in first line (1L cohort), 30 (90.0% single agent) in second line (2L cohort), and 66 (83.3% single agent) in third line or later (3L+ cohort). Mean age was 71.6 years; 33.1% were female; mean baseline Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 4.7; median follow up from the start of 1L was 25.3 months; median duration of index LOT was 4.2 months. The majority of 2L+ Ven patients were previously treated with Ibr (2L: 56.7%, 3L+: 74.2%). Patients in all 3 cohorts had frequent outpatient (OP) visits PPPM during their index LOT (1L: 4.58; 2L: 4.75; 3L+: 5.71). Total costs PPPM during the index LOT were highest in the 1L cohort (1L: $21,762; 2L: $17,697; 3L+: $20,900), driven by higher OP costs (1L $9,402; 2L: $5,633; 3L+: $7,701). Increased total costs PPPM were observed during Ven ramp-up (1L: $31,707; 2L: $21,036; 3L+: $25,362). Compared to the overall 2L cohort, those treated with Ibr in 1L had lower total costs PPPM (index LOT: $15,350; V ramp-up: $15,882). Conclusions: In this descriptive study, the highest costs PPPM were observed for Ven treatment in the 1L. Prior treatment with Ibr was common among 2L and 3L+ CLL/SLL patients treated with Ven. Among 2L Ven patients, those previously treated with Ibr in 1L had $2,347 and $5,154 lower costs PPPM during 2L and Ven ramp-up, respectively, suggesting that previous Ibr treatment may help reduce costs in subsequent V treatment.

Abstract P2-17-04: Real world treatment sequencing patterns in secondary breast cancer (SBC): Pathway visualisation using national datasets

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment pathways in metastatic breast cancer are complex. The accelerated adoption of new medicines has resulted in an uncertain evidence base supporting their use. Uncertainties are related to the mismatch between trial-recruited and real-world populations and variation in the order of sequential drugs. Published examples describing real-world practice in SBC are scarce, mainly due to the complexity of the clinical pathways that rely on a mixture of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and biologicals, often over a long period. We demonstrate how new opportunities in routine healthcare data allow a highly granular description of real-world treatment pathways and how this varies in light of patient (pt) case-mix. METHODS Scottish nationally available data source datasets for linkage included the National Cancer Registry, Scottish Morbidity Record, the National Cancer Quality Audit and the national Prescribing Information System. Scottish CHI number was the universal identifier for linkage. Key baseline characteristics included age, de-novo presentation, prior adjuvant treatments, co-morbidities, concomitant medications and socioeconomic status. Targeted and random sampling manual review was used to quantify missing data. R version 3.6 was used for analysis. RESULTS 345 pts were identified of which 276 had ER+HER2- SBC between 2012-2017. First line therapy included 68% (235 patients) endocrine therapy, 17% (59 pts) chemotherapy, 14% (50 pts) received no treatment. Subsequent treatment decisions, including best supportive care and death, have been tracked to identify 70 unique pathways with up to 8 lines of treatment. Graphical representation of treatment pathways is made using Sankey plots. Detailed data quality reports describe missing data rates over time and a comprehensive guide for analysts has been produced as a wiki [https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/canceroutcomes/edinburgh-cancer-informatics-wiki/]. CONCLUSIONS It is now possible to describe treatment sequences using routine, nationally available administrative healthcare data. Pathways are complex and do not always conform to standard guidelines. Interpretation requires modern graphical visualisation methods. Of the 235 patients who received first line endocrine therapy, 48% (114 patients) went on second line endocrine therapy, 22% (51 patients) were switched to chemotherapy, 0.4% (1 patient) entered a trial, 18% (43 patients) died on the treatment and 11% (26 patients) went on to best supportive care (BSC). Of the 59 patients who received first line chemotherapy, 36% (21 patients) received second line chemotherapy, 36% (21 patients) received second line endocrine therapy, 24% (14 patients) died on treatment and 5% (3 patients) went on to BSC. The 1 patient who entered a trial went on to have chemotherapy as next line of treatment. Citation Format: Olga Oikonomidou, Ashley Horne, M McMenemy, E Holly, L Murdoch, Caroline Michie, Richard L Hayward, Christina Lilley, Peter S Hall. Real world treatment sequencing patterns in secondary breast cancer (SBC): Pathway visualisation using national datasets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-17-04.