Real-world Treatment Patterns Research Articles

Real world treatment patterns in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan

Real world treatment patterns in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan

Emapalumab Treatment in Patients With Rheumatologic Disease-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in the United States: A Retrospective Medical Chart Review Study.

Rheumatologic disease-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a rare, life-threatening, systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome, occurs as a complication of underlying rheumatologic disease. Real-world evidence is lacking on emapalumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the proinflammatory cytokine interferon-γ, approved for treating patients with primary HLH. REAL-HLH, a retrospective medical chart review study conducted across 33 US hospitals, assessed real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HLH treated with one or more dose of emapalumab between November 20, 2018, and October 31, 2021. Data are presented for the subset of patients with rheumatologic disease-associated HLH. Fifteen of 105 patients (14.3%) had rheumatologic disease-associated HLH. Of these, nine (60.0%) had systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and one (6.7%) had adult-onset Still disease. Median (range) age at HLH diagnosis was 5 (0.9-39) years. Most patients (9 of 15; 60.0%) initiated emapalumab in an intensive care unit. Emapalumab was most frequently initiated for treating refractory or recurrent (10 of 15; 66.7%) disease. Most patients received HLH-related therapies before (10 of 15; 66.7%) and concurrently with (15 of 15; 100.0%) emapalumab. Emapalumab-containing regimens stabilized or achieved physician-determined normalization of most laboratory parameters, including absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count (13 of 14; 92.9%), chemokine ligand 9 (9 of 11; 81.8%), and platelets and alanine transaminase (11 of 14; 78.6%), and reduced glucocorticoid dose by 80%. Overall survival and 12-month survival probability from emapalumab initiation were 86.7%. Emapalumab-containing regimens stabilized or normalized most key laboratory parameters, reduced glucocorticoid dose, and were associated with low disease-related mortality, thereby demonstrating potential benefits in patients with rheumatologic disease-associated HLH.

Treatment satisfaction in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-world survey from the EU5 and US.

Introduction Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin disorder. Treatment strategies in patients with HS are challenging; real-world evidence in a HS population is warranted for greater disease understanding. The objective of this analysis was to describe real-world treatment patterns and treatment satisfaction in patients with HS. Methods This was a cross-sectional market research survey with retrospective data collection in patients with HS from the United States and five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) between November 2020 and April 2021, using physician- and patient-reported surveys. Eligible physicians were general dermatologists actively managing patients with HS; dermatologists were required to have consulted with ≥2 patients with HS in the previous 12 months. Adult (≥18 years) and adolescent (10‒17 years) HS patients visiting a participating dermatologist were included. Outcomes included treatment patterns, flare status, treatments prescribed in response to flares, previous surgeries, barriers to biologics, and patient- and physician-reported satisfaction with the disease control provided by treatment. Results Survey data from 1787 patients were collected from 312 dermatologists. The most frequently prescribed treatments were topicals, oral antibiotics, and antiseptic washes/creams at diagnosis and sampling. At sampling, biologics were more frequently prescribed in patients with more severe disease (prescribed in 26.6%, 31.0% and 52.4% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively); oral antibiotics (48.8%), topicals (37.4%), and biologics (34.3%) were the most frequently prescribed treatment classes in response to a flare. Of patients currently not receiving a biologic, dermatologists reported that 18.9% of patients' condition warranted their use. Approximately one quarter of dermatologists (24.5%) and patients (27.4%) were not satisfied with current treatment; of patients who were dissatisfied, 12.8% reported they would never raise their dissatisfaction with their doctor. Conclusion These real-world data suggest a high disease burden and potential undertreatment in patients with HS. Patients received multiple treatments, and a notable proportion underwent surgery. Robustly integrating the patient voice in HS treatment decisions may lead to better outcomes and improved treatment satisfaction.

P178 Contemporary management of patients in Greece with advanced/metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: real-world treatment patterns and patient profiling

P178 Contemporary management of patients in Greece with advanced/metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: real-world treatment patterns and patient profiling

Understanding real-world treatment patterns of patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the first-line maintenance setting: The FIRST STEP Study

Understanding real-world treatment patterns of patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the first-line maintenance setting: The FIRST STEP Study

Real-world treatment patterns, biomarker testing, and clinical outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the immunotherapy era

BackgroundTreatment for first-line (1L) metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC) changed with the introduction of immunotherapy. We describe treatment utilization and clinical outcomes in a real-world mNSCLC cohort in a 2.7-million-member state-mandated health provider.MethodsNewly diagnosed mNSCLC patients initiating systemic anti-cancer treatment (January 2017–December 2020) were identified from the National Cancer Registry. Real-world time on treatment (rwToT) was defined as the length of time between the first and last administration date of treatment. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up (cutoff: 30 June 2021).ResultsAmong 843 patients, 85% had adenocarcinoma (NSQ) and 15% had squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) histology: of these, 43% and 26% were women, median age was 67 and 69 years, and 55% and 48% had 0–1 ECOG performance status, respectively (missing: 27% and 30%, respectively). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 27.1 months (95% CI: 24.7–29.6). NSQ patients with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PDM) (N = 147) or combination (PDC) (N = 194) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC, N = 133). Median rwToT was 4.5 (95% CI: 3.5–7.6), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.6–7.6), and 2.3 (95% CI: 2.1–3.0) months, respectively; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0–1, rwToT was 9.4 (95% CI: 5.0–20.8), 7.1 (95% CI: 5.0–10.1), and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.2–4.1) months, respectively. Median rwOS from 1L was 12.5 (95% CI: 9.9–17.9), 14.8 (95% CI: 10.5–19.4), and 9.1 (95% CI: 7.1–11.5) months; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0–1, median rwOS was 25.1 [95% CI: 14.9–not reached (NR)], 17.6 (95% CI: 14.3–NR), and 11.3 (95% CI: 9.2–21.3) months, respectively. For ECOG PS 0–1 and PD-L1 ≥50% patients, median rwOS was 25.1 months (95% CI: 13.9–NR) and NR for PDM and PDC, respectively. For ECOG PS 0–1 and PD-L1 <50% patients, median rwOS was 14.3 (95% CI: 10.1–NR) and 11.2 (95% CI: 9.1–21.3) months for PDC and PBC, respectively.ConclusionOur real-world data support the benefit of single-agent PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high expression or PD-1 inhibitor combination for all patients diagnosed with mNSCLC with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations, initiating 1L treatment.

Real-world perioperative treatment patterns and burden of recurrent disease in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer: a SEER-Medicare study

Objectives To elucidate unmet needs in high-risk endometrial cancer (EC), this study described perioperative treatment patterns in Medicare beneficiaries with high-risk EC and quantified the impact of disease recurrence on clinical and economic outcomes among patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Methods Patients aged ≥66 years with high-risk EC (stage I/II EC of non-endometrioid histology or stage III/IVA EC of any histology) receiving hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy from SEER-Medicare data (2007–2019) were identified; perioperative treatment patterns were described. Post-operative treatment patterns were described among patients receiving adjuvant therapy; overall survival (OS), all-cause and EC-related healthcare resource utilization and costs were evaluated from recurrence date (using a claims-based algorithm developed with clinical input) for recurrent patients and from a frequency-matched date for non-recurrent patients. Results Of 2,279 patients receiving EC surgery, 3.1% received neoadjuvant therapy and 55.3% received adjuvant therapy. Among 1,199 patients receiving adjuvant therapy, systemic adjuvant therapy with radiation (38.9%) was most common. Median OS was 1.4 years among 378 (31.5%) recurrent patients identified over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Recurrent patients had significantly higher per-patient-year rates of all-cause outpatient visits (37.7 vs. 22.6), EC-related outpatient visits (14.5 vs. 3.0), and all-cause hospitalizations (1.3 vs. 0.4) than non-recurrent patients, and an excess of $84,562 and $62,128 in all-cause and EC-related annual costs, predominantly driven by hospitalizations. Conclusions Our findings highlight the considerable clinical and economic burden experienced by patients with high-risk EC experiencing recurrence and emphasize the unmet need for novel therapies in early settings to mitigate this burden.

Real-world treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and health care resource utilization for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Spain.

Real-world evidence on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) management in Spain is limited. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in this population. This retrospective observational study included all adults with a first diagnosis/record of la/mUC (index date) from January 2015 to June 2020 at nine university hospitals in Spain. Data were collected up to December 31, 2020 (end of study), death, or loss to follow-up. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from index date (Kaplan-Meier estimates), and disease-specific HCRU were described. Among 829 patients, median age at diagnosis was 71years; 70.2% had ≥ 1 comorbidity, and 52.5% were eligible for cisplatin. Median follow-up was 12.7months. Most (84.7%) patients received first-line systemic treatment; of these, 46.9% (n = 329) received second-line and 16.6% (n = 116) received third-line therapy. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment in all lines of therapy, followed by programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors. Median (95% confidence interval) OS and PFS were 18.8 (17.5-21.5) and 9.9 (8.9-10.5) months, respectively. Most patients required ≥ 1 outpatient visit (71.8%), inpatient admission (56.6%), or emergency department visit (56.5%). Therapeutic patterns were consistent with Spanish guideline recommendations. Chemotherapy had a role in first-line treatment of la/mUC in Spain during the study period. However, the disease burden remains high, and new first-line treatments recommended in the latest European guidelines should be made available to patients in Spain.

EP.07C.09 Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) In Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Real-World Treatment Patterns and Surgical Outcomes

EP.07C.09 Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) In Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Real-World Treatment Patterns and Surgical Outcomes

S1420 Real World Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients With Crohn’s Disease (CD) Treated With Risankizumab: A US Claims Database Study

S1420 Real World Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients With Crohn’s Disease (CD) Treated With Risankizumab: A US Claims Database Study

S1197 Early Real-World Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in Upadacitinib-Treated Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A U.S. Claims Database Study

S1197 Early Real-World Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in Upadacitinib-Treated Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A U.S. Claims Database Study

Real-world (rw) treatment (tx) patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) treated with avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM): Updated results from the SPEAR Bladder II study.

393 Background: Avelumab 1LM tx is approved in the US for pts with la/mUC who do not have disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). The tx landscape is evolving due to the recent approvals of newer therapies for pts with la/mUC. This study examines rw tx patterns, tx sequencing post avelumab 1LM, and OS in pts with la/mUC who initiated 1L tx in the US community oncology setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the US Oncology Network (iKnowMed) EHR database. The study included adult pts (≥18 years) with la/mUC initiating 1L tx (index date) between Dec 1, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023. Pts were censored for OS at their last contact date or the end of study period, Feb 28, 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to describe tx patterns. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate OS from the start of 1LM or second-line (2L) enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment post avelumab 1LM. Results: A total of 1,658 pts with la/mUC initiated 1L tx with a median (range) follow-up of 9.0 months (0.1-50.4). The median (range) age at diagnosis was 73 years (31-90+), 74.7% were male and 47.1% had ECOG performance status ≤1. The 1L therapies included: IO monotherapy (41.2%), PBC only (32.4%), PBC followed by avelumab 1LM (11.2%), and other tx (15.1%). Since the US FDA approval (June 30, 2020), the utilization of avelumab 1LM among 1L PBC users ranged from 25.0% to 32.9% in 2023. Median (range) follow-up from the start of avelumab 1LM was 9.1 months (0.5-42.2). During the study observation period, 44 pts (23.7%) remained on avelumab 1LM. Median (95% CI) OS from start of avelumab 1LM was 18.5 months (13.8-23.8). Among the overall study cohort, 598 (36.1%) and 196 pts (11.8%) received 2L and third-line tx, respectively. The most common 2L therapies were IO monotherapy (44.1%) and EV monotherapy (23.9%). After discontinuation of avelumab 1LM, 81 pts (43.5%) received 2L tx, 48 (59.3%) of those received EV; median OS from start of 2L EV was 12.7 months (7.2-16.5). Conclusions: These rw study findings demonstrate avelumab 1LM effectiveness for pts whose disease has not progressed on 1L PBC and provides evidence of the use of 2L EV after avelumab 1LM. There was an increased uptake of avelumab 1LM since its FDA approval. Survival outcomes are consistent with the JAVELIN Bladder 100 clinical trial and other rw studies that had shorter follow-up. We observed high IO monotherapy use despite the platinum-ineligible population typically making up 11% of pts with la/mUC. 1 Some of these pts treated with IO monotherapy may benefit from alternative 1L regimens. Future rw studies are needed to further characterize contemporary tx patterns, optimal tx sequencing, and survival in pts with la/mUC amidst the evolving tx landscape. 1 Gupta S, et al. JNCI 2024;116(4):547–554.

Real-world characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with 2 or more LOTs for CLL/SLL in the United States

AbstractThe development of targeted agents for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) has transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with CLL. Because of this evolving treatment landscape, there was a need for contemporaneous evidence related to US treatment patterns and outcomes among patients treated in the real world. Using COTA’s electronic health records–based database, we examined characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients receiving ≥2 line of therapy (LOT). A total of 1283 adult patients with CLL/SLL were identified in the data set who initiated second LOT (2L) between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2022. Of those patients, 542 patients (42.2%) later received third-line (3L) therapy, of whom 228 (42.1%) went on to receive fourth-line (4L) therapy. Overall, >18% of patients died after 2L initiation and before 3L initiation, and more than a quarter died before 4L initiation. The majority of the population was White (77.7%), male (60.6%), aged ≥65 years (68.8%), and treated in a community practice setting (87.8%). Regarding treatment patterns, from 2014 to 2023, use of chemoimmunotherapy in any ≥2L LOT decreased, whereas use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor therapy increased. Across end points, median time to event(s) were generally shorter with each subsequent LOT received, both in the overall population and among patients receiving a given therapy in different LOTs. With a median follow-up time from 2L initiation of 38.0 months, median real-world time to next treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival from 2L was 31.9, 33.8, and 80.1 months, respectively. Despite great advancements in CLL/SLL treatments since 2014, unmet need persists for patients receiving late LOT.

P1.12A.01 Real-World Outcomes and Treatment Patterns after First-Line Osimertinib in Patients with Advanced NSCLC and Uncommon EGFRm

P1.12A.01 Real-World Outcomes and Treatment Patterns after First-Line Osimertinib in Patients with Advanced NSCLC and Uncommon EGFRm

Real-world (rw) treatment (tx) patterns and clinical outcomes among patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving first-line (1L) systemic tx and avelumab 1L maintenance (1LM): Results from the IMPACT UC-III study.

390 Background: Avelumab 1LM is a standard of care for pts with mUC that has not progressed after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Immuno-oncology (IO) monotherapy is considered in pts with mUC who are ineligible to receive PBC. Recently approved 1L tx options include enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab and nivolumab + gemcitabine/cisplatin. This US retrospective study examined pt characteristics, tx patterns, and clinical outcomes among pts with mUC receiving 1L tx, including avelumab 1LM. Methods: Pts with mUC (bladder cancer; stage IIIB or IV, or ≥2 claims with ICD-10 diagnoses for metastatic cancer) aged ≥18 years, who initiated 1L tx (index date) from Jan 1, 2020 to Jul 31, 2023, were identified from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®; claims and clinical data from the health plan’s Cancer Care Quality Program). Clinical outcomes, including time to next tx (TTNT; time from 1L tx initiation to second-line tx) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated post index date. Pt characteristics and tx patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Avelumab 1LM use was identified on/after June 30, 2020 and ≤90 d after 1L PBC discontinuation. OS from the start of 1L tx or 1LM was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Of 2,820 pts with mUC, 1L tx was PBC in 37.0% (n=1,044), IO monotherapy in 39.0% (n=1,099), and other tx in 24.0% (n=677; antibody-drug conjugates and non-PBC). Among pts who received 1L PBC, 15.0% (n=157) initiated avelumab 1LM within 90 days of completing 1L PBC. Avelumab uptake in 2020-2023 by year was 10.8% (Jun-Dec 2020), 29.9%, 34.4%, and 24.8% (Jan-Aug 2023), respectively; 38.9% of pts were still receiving avelumab at the end of the study period. In the 1L PBC and IO cohorts, mean age (SD) was 65.5 (11.1) and 74.6 (10.7) years, respectively. 60% of pts were male. In the 1L PBC and 1L IO monotherapy cohorts, respectively, median follow-up (IQR) was 11.2 (5.6-20.3) and 8.6 (4.0-17.7) months (mo); median TTNT (IQR) was 4.8 (2.8-8.3) and 5.5 (2.8-11.0) mo; and median OS (95% CI) was 29.7 (25.1-37.2) and 20.0 (17.1-25.6) mo. In pts who received avelumab 1LM, median follow-up (IQR) from start of 1L PBC was 14.6 (9.2-21.3) mo; median TTNT (IQR) was 7.6 (6.2-12.3) mo; median time on avelumab tx was 5.0 (1.8-10.2) mo; and 1- and 2-year OS rates, respectively, from start of avelumab 1LM were 78% and 65%, and from start of 1L PBC were 84% and 68% (median OS was not estimable because >50% of pts remained alive at the end of the study period). Conclusions: Despite advances in 1L tx for mUC, IO monotherapy remains a prevailing option for older, commercially insured patients in the US. In this descriptive rw study, pts treated with 1L PBC had longer OS than pts treated with 1L IO monotherapy. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate pt outcomes.

EP.12G.02 Real-World Biomarker Testing and Treatment Patterns for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Canada

EP.12G.02 Real-World Biomarker Testing and Treatment Patterns for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Canada

O6-2 Real-world treatment patterns of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Japan

O6-2 Real-world treatment patterns of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Japan

MO20-6 Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in Japanese patients with large B-cell lymphoma after two systemic therapies

MO20-6 Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in Japanese patients with large B-cell lymphoma after two systemic therapies

P4.11E.13 Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Cost and Resource Utilization in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic NSCLC in the US

P4.11E.13 Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Cost and Resource Utilization in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic NSCLC in the US

EP.11A.12 Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Following Chemotherapy and Anti-PD-(L)1 In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

EP.11A.12 Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Following Chemotherapy and Anti-PD-(L)1 In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer