Real-world Japanese Patients Research Articles

Real-World Pharmacokinetics, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent NSCLC: An Exploratory Study of J-TAIL

IntroductionThis study validated real-world pharmacokinetic (PK) data using an established population PK (PopPK) model for atezolizumab in Japanese patients with NSCLC and explored the relationship between PK parameters, effectiveness, and adverse events (AEs) for the 1200 mg once every three weeks regimen. MethodsA subgroup of 262 of 1039 patients from J-TAIL consented to this exploratory research for PK evaluation of atezolizumab monotherapy for unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC (August 2018 to October 2019; 197 institutions). We evaluated plasma concentrations before the start of the third cycle of atezolizumab infusion classified into quartiles 1 to 4, their association with effectiveness, and the association between atezolizumab maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) calculated using the existing PopPK model and AEs of special interest (AESIs). ResultsOverall, 175 of 262 patients were included; baseline characteristics were similar to those of patients enrolled in J-TAIL (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2, 12.0%; age ≥ 75 y, 28.9%; atezolizumab as more than or equal to third-line treatment, 57.5%). Atezolizumab plasma concentrations were similar to previously reported data among Japanese/non-Japanese patients. The overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with lower atezolizumab plasma concentrations in Q1 versus Q2 to Q4, although progression-free survival remained the same. The PK data adequately fit the PopPK model, with the frequency of AESIs increasing as the calculated Cmax at cycle 1 increased. ConclusionsIn real-world Japanese patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC, PKs were similar to previous reports. Certain patient populations had shorter overall survival, and atezolizumab plasma concentrations in cycle 3 were lower in this population. Elevated Cmax at cycle 1 may be associated with an increased frequency of AESIs.

Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients: data with a minimum of 3years of follow-up.

Long-term follow-up data regarding treatment outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy are limited in real-world Japanese populations. We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with a follow-up of at least 3years. Survival, tumour response and adverse event profiles were assessed. A total of 41 patients (73%) were histopathologically diagnosed with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and 34 (61%) were categorized into the International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk group. The median follow-up period was 34.4months. Regarding an effectiveness profile, median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 9.01, 12.5 and 49.0months, respectively. Objective response was observed in 27 patients (48%), including eight patients with complete response (14%), and the median duration of response was 30.8months. Multivariate analyses showed that clear-cell histology was an independent factor of longer overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.23, P=0.0013). Regarding safety profiles, adverse events of any grade and those with grade≥3 developed in 40 (71%) and 25 patients (45%), respectively. Median time to adverse event development was 1.68months. Treatment was interrupted in 28 patients (50%), and corticosteroid administration was needed in 25 (45%). The 3-year follow-up data showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy exhibited a feasible effectiveness in real-world Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Accordingly, the high risk of adverse event development, which often requires treatment withdrawal and corticosteroid administration, should be considered.

Real-world clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulants among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant coronary artery disease

BackgroundStroke prevention is complicated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the risk of major bleeding among Japanese patients with AF and CAD commencing warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. MethodsThis study included adults with AF and CAD who were newly prescribed the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran or rivaroxaban, or warfarin, and registered between 18 April 2011 through 31 December 2020 in the Medical Data Vision hospital-based clinical database. The primary outcome was major bleeding, and the secondary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, all-cause inpatient mortality, major bleeding, major gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Cox proportional hazard models with stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % CIs via a two-step approach; first between warfarin and each NOAC, then between NOACs if sample size conditions were met. ResultsDabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin groups included 6712, 20,329, and 12,316 patients, respectively. Major bleeding risk was lower in NOACs versus warfarin (dabigatran: HR 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.40–0.62; rivaroxaban: HR 0.78, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.90); this risk was lower with dabigatran compared with rivaroxaban (HR 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.51─0.79). Net clinical benefit was superior to warfarin in both NOACs (dabigatran: HR 0.78, 95 % CI: 0.71–0.85; rivaroxaban: HR 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.78–0.88). ConclusionsAmong real-world Japanese patients with AF and CAD, NOACs were associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin. Treatment with dabigatran had a lower risk of major bleeding than rivaroxaban.Clinical trial registration: NCT05051904 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Improved Survival of Real-world Japanese Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Immuno-oncology Combination Therapy.

Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapy has become the standard of treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy of first-line molecular targeted therapy (MTT), administered as monotherapy, and IO combination therapy using real-world data of Japanese patients. The clinical information of 202 patients with RCC who received MTT (n=144) or IO combination therapy (n=58) at the Kurume University Hospital from May 2008 to May 2022 was collected and retrospectively analyzed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated. The patients treated with IO combination therapy had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those treated with MTT (p=0.0038). IO combination therapy was significantly associated with a better PFS in patients with intermediate (p=0.0072) and poor risk (p=0.0411) but not in those with favorable risk (p=0.5434). Furthermore, overall survival with IO combination therapy was significantly better in patients at poor risk (p=0.0335). Multivariate analyses suggested that prior nephrectomy (HR=1.501, 95%CI=1.048-2.150, p=0.0268) and first-line therapy (HR=1.962, 95%CI=1.288-2.986, p=0.0017) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. IO combination therapy significantly improved the PFS of patients with advanced RCC, especially those with intermediate- and poor-risk disease. Further investigations focusing on the improvement of survival are warranted.

A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of prasugrel and clopidogrel in younger population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study using a Japanese claims database

BackgroundPrasugrel inhibits platelet aggregation more potently than clopidogrel. In the global phase III trial, prasugrel [loading dose/maintenance dose (LD/MD), 60/10 mg] reduced the incidence of ischemic events but involved a higher risk of hemorrhage than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes who were scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the Japanese phase III trial for similar patients wherein the prasugrel dose regimen was adjusted (LD/MD, 20/3.75 mg), the efficacy of prasugrel and clopidogrel were comparable to that in the global trial; however, the safety could not be determined due to limited power. Given the strict enrollment criteria, the results of the Japanese phase III trial may not be applicable to routine clinical practice. We compared the safety and effectiveness of prasugrel and clopidogrel in the real-world setting in Japanese patients. MethodsWith an analysis of a large claims database prepared during the post-marketing stages in Japan, we identified patients undergoing PCI and compared the incidence of bleeding and ischemic coronary events between patients who received prasugrel and those receiving clopidogrel. ResultsBetween January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018, we identified 1977 patients who were scheduled to undergo urgent PCI (urgent PCI cohort) and 1922 who were scheduled to undergo elective PCI (elective PCI cohort). After propensity-score matching, there were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics of the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups in the urgent (n = 1080) and elective PCI (n = 1626) cohorts. In Cox proportional hazard analyses, there were no significant differences in the incidence of bleeding or ischemic coronary events during the median 8-month follow-up in both cohorts. ConclusionsThe safety and effectiveness of prasugrel was comparable to that of clopidogrel in real-world Japanese patients scheduled to undergo PCI.

Impact of high-dose statin on cardiovascular outcomes in real-world patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Little is known about the impact of a high-dose statin on cardiovascular outcomes after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) in real-world Japanese patients. Between July 2011 and June 2017, 1110 consecutive STEMI patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention at our hospital and were discharged. A high-dose statin was administered in 117 patients (10.5%) and non-high-dose statin was administered in 947 patients (85.3%). The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was significantly higher in the high-dose statin group at admission (129.8 ± 44.9 vs. 110.4 ± 32.7, p < 0.0001), but the levels were not significantly different at follow-up (86.7 ± 25.7 vs. 85.0 ± 25.0, p = 0.52). The cumulative 2-year incidence of a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and any unplanned coronary revascularization was significantly lower in the high-dose statin group (6.2% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p = 0.004). Propensity score matched analysis indicated similar results. Among the types of coronary revascularization, a high-dose statin was significantly correlated with a lower rate of de novo lesion revascularization (hazard ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.83; p = 0.02). The results of our analyses indicate that administration of a high-dose statin may result in better cardiovascular outcomes after STEMI mainly by reducing the rate of revascularization for de novo lesions regardless of the achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in real-world patients.

Follow-up Results of HCV GT2 Patients After Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin Therapy: Careful Attention to Occurrence of HCC.

We examined treatment the efficacy and data on long-term outcomes in real-world Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 treated with 12-week sofosbuvir/ribavirin combination therapy. In a total of 86 patients who were treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, sustained virological response (SVR) rates and long-term-outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The adherence to this combination therapy was 98.8%. The rates of SVR at week 24 (SVR24) achieved with this treatment according to the 'intention-to-treat' and 'per-protocol' analyses were 89.5% and 96.2%, respectively. Two patients who experienced relapse did not have any previously reported resistance-associated substitutions in the HCV non-structural protein 5B (NS5B) polymerase region. We did not observe any patients who experienced late relapse but did observe that 50% and 1.3% of patients with and without a previous history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), respectively, developed HCC after achieving SVR24 (with a mean follow-up period of 2.7±0.8 years). Patients with SVR should be carefully followed-up to screen for the occurrence of HCC, although it is infrequent.

HCV NS5A resistance-associated variants in a group of real-world Japanese patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b.

Recent advances in interferon-free treatment could lead to the eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from patients infected with HCV. One of the direct-acting anti-viral agents, HCV NS5A inhibitor, is available for these combination therapies. However, naturally occurring resistance-associated variants (RAVs) to HCV NS5A inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b are still unknown. We performed ultra-deep sequencing and analysed previously reported RAVs in a total 132 HCV genotype 1b-infected Japanese patients who had never used HCV NS5A inhibitors. We also performed direct-sequencing by Sanger method in consecutively selected 50 of the total 132 samples, and the differences between the results of the two methods were compared. In the comparison of the variant frequencies of ultra-deep sequencing with RAVs of direct-sequencing by Sanger method in 50 patients, we identified 32 RAVs by direct-sequencing with the Sanger method; minimum variant frequency was shown by ultra-deep sequencing to be 9%. A total of 110 RAVs were identified only by ultra-deep sequencing. In the samples from all 132 patients, L31W (2.3%), L31V (49.2%), L31F (41.7%), L31M (1.5%), L31I (5.3%), L31S (2.0%), L31P (3.0%) and L31R (0.8%), and Y93N (2.3%), Y93H (25%), Y93C (0.8%), Y93P (2.3%) and Y93D (0.8%) were identified. We demonstrated naturally-occurring RAVs of HCV NS5A inhibitors by ultra-deep sequencing and that several mutations including Y93H are common in HCV NS5A inhibitor-treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b. Careful attention should be paid to these RAVs, and further improvement of treatment options might be needed.

Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following treatment with the endeavor zotarolimus‐eluting stent in real‐world Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (OPERA): Study design and rationale

In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), there is an increasing therapeutic need among interventional cardiologists to conduct dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) whose duration is shorter than current guideline-recommended 6-12 months after the implantation of drug-eluting stents. However, no clinical grounds sufficient to rationalize the need are available. To define the optimal duration of DAPT and to examine the safety and efficacy of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) in real-world Japanese patients with CAD. The present prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, controlled study is uniquely designed to examine the analysis set to be formulated after integrating two different databases consisting of the following two study arms: the 3-month DAPT arm, in which 1,210 patients were consecutively enrolled at 106 medical institutions; and the 12-month DAPT arm, in which 1,210 patients will be consecutively extracted from the Endeavor Japan post-marketing surveillance at 60 medical institutions. The primary endpoint is "net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events-death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding)" at 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoints are as follows: major adverse cardiac events at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after implantation; target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization at 9 and 12 months after implantation; and stent thrombosis, DAPT compliance, and bleeding events at 12 months after implantation. Noninferiority in the E-ZES's profiles between the study arms will be investigated. The present study will provide insight into the optimal duration of DAPT after the E-ZES implantation in individual, real-world patients with CAD.

TCT-143 Twelve-Month Clinical Outcomes from the Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Treatment with Endeavor (Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent) in Real-World Japanese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (OPERA) Study

Increasingly cardiologists need to place coronary artery disease patients implanted with drug-eluting stents on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens of durations shorter than the 6-12 months recommended in current guidelines. Unfortunately, no sufficient clinical data are available to support