Real-world Healthcare Resource Utilization Research Articles

Real-world healthcare resource utilization, costs, and predictors of relapse among US patients with incident schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder present burdens to patients and health systems through elevated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, there is a paucity of evidence describing these burdens across payor types. To identify unmet needs, this study characterized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder by payor type. We identified patients aged 12–94 years with newly diagnosed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (index date) between 01/01/2014 and 08/31/2020 with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and after index date from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database. After stratifying by post-index relapse frequency (0, 1, or ≥2) and payor type (commercial, Medicare Advantage/Supplemental (Medigap)/Part D, or managed Medicaid), we examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, costs, and relapse patterns and predictors. During follow-up, 25% of commercial patients, 29% of Medicare patients, and 37% of Medicaid patients experienced relapse. Atypical antipsychotic discontinuation was most common among Medicaid patients, with 65% of these patients discontinuing during follow-up. Compared to commercial patients, Medicare and Medicaid patients had approximately half as many psychotherapy visits during follow-up (12 vs. 5 vs. 7 visits, respectively). Relative to baseline, average unadjusted all-cause costs during follow-up increased by 105% for commercial patients, 66% for Medicare patients, and 77% for Medicaid patients. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder had high HCRU and costs but consistently low psychotherapy utilization, and they often discontinued pharmacologic therapy and experienced relapse. These findings illustrate the high burden and unmet need for managing these conditions and opportunities to improve care for underserved patients.

Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab

Objectives To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. Methods Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. Results A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. Conclusions Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Health Outcomes, and Healthcare Resource Use in Advanced Common EGFR-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Osimertinib in Alberta.

There is limited information on the treatment trajectory and outcomes of patients with advanced cEGFRm NSCLC treated with osimertinib in routine clinical practice in Canada. By using and analyzing population-based administrative data and detailed chart abstraction in the province of Alberta, our objective was to capture Canadian-specific real-world treatment patterns, health outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in advanced cEGFRm NSCLC patients who were (a) treated with osimertinib and (b) those receiving treatment after osimertinib. In our study cohort, we found that the overall survival rates for real-world patients receiving osimertinib were less favorable than those observed in clinical trials (24.0 versus 38.6 months). The attrition rate after osimertinib was substantial and high HCRU persisted across many years after diagnosis and treatment. This study provides important real-world evidence on contemporary survival, treatment patterns, and healthcare use among cEGFRm NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib and suggests that further research efforts are needed to improve therapeutic options in both the first and subsequent line settings.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Commercially Insured Patients in the United States.

To evaluate real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the United States. Retrospective case-control cohort analysis of Optum Clinformatics claims data (January 2008-September 2020) comparing unadjusted and adjusted HCRU (visits per 1,000 patients per month) and all-cause costs (per patient per month). Patients with EoE incurred significantly higher monthly HCRU (adjusted Δ [95% confidence interval]: inpatient visits, 2.8 [0.1-4.0]; emergency department visits, 14.7 [4.3-32.1]; outpatient visits, 388.8 [362.1-418.0]); and costs ($581 [$421-$600]) vs matched controls (all P < 0.001). EoE imposes substantial economic burden. More effective and targeted treatments that improve outcomes for patients are needed.

EE452 Prevalence, Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs of Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in the US: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

EE452 Prevalence, Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs of Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in the US: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

RWD87 Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Costs, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients in the US With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Systemic Anticancer Therapy

RWD87 Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Costs, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients in the US With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Systemic Anticancer Therapy

EE340 Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease By Stage: A Retrospective Observational Study

EE340 Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease By Stage: A Retrospective Observational Study

Patient-reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in systemic lupus erythematosus: impact of disease activity

BackgroundLimited real-world data exists on clinical outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), hereafter, SLEDAI. We aimed to examine the association between SLEDAI score and clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in patients with SLE.MethodsRheumatologists from the United States of America and Europe provided real-world demographic, clinical, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data for SLE patients. Patients provided self-reported outcome data, capturing their general health status using the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), health-related quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and work productivity using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Low disease activity was defined as SLEDAI score ≤ 4 and ≤ 7.5 mg/day glucocorticoids; patients not meeting these criteria were considered to have “higher” active disease. Data were compared between patients with low and higher disease activity. Logistic regression estimated a propensity score for SLE based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score matched analyses compared HCRU, patient-reported outcomes, income loss and treatment satisfaction in patients with low disease activity versus higher active disease.ResultsData from 296 physicians reporting on 730 patients (46 low disease activity, 684 higher active disease), and from 377 patients’ self-reported questionnaires (24 low disease activity, 353 higher active disease) were analyzed. Flaring in the previous 12 months was 2.6-fold more common among patients with higher versus low active disease. Equation 5D-3 L utility index was 0.79 and 0.88 and FACIT-Fatigue scores were 34.78 and 39.79 in low versus higher active disease patients, respectively, indicating better health and less fatigue, among patients with low versus higher active disease. Absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and total activity impairment were 47.0-, 2.0-, 2.6- and 1.5-fold greater in patients with higher versus low disease activity. In the previous 12 months there were 28% more healthcare consultations and 3.4-fold more patients hospitalized in patients with higher versus low disease activity.ConclusionCompared to SLE patients with higher active disease, patients with low disease activity experienced better health status, lower HCRU, less fatigue, and lower work productivity impairment, with work absenteeism being substantially lower in these patients.

Real-world adherence and healthcare resource utilization of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) in mantle cell lymphoma.

e19048 Background: This study aimed to examine treatment adherence and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of BTKi treatment in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Methods: The Symphony Integrated Dataverse (IDV) was used to conduct a retrospective observational study. Adult patients with MCL initiating their first BTKi or second BTKi (after ibrutinib) between 01/2020 and 10/2023 were included in the study. The index was defined as the date of BTKi initiation. Patients without 30 days of continuous enrollment pre- and post-index date were excluded. Patients were followed until the end of the study period or lost to follow-up. Adherence was evaluated by compliance and persistence. Compliance was calculated as the proportion of days covered &gt;0.80 using 30-day intervals from initiation to 1 year. Persistence was measured as the proportion of patients who remained in treatment among patients with sufficient follow-up periods. HCRU was measured by all-cause outpatient visits, inpatient services, and other medical/hospital services per-patient-per-month (PPPM) during BTKi treatment. Results: Among 2,122 patients who were first-time BTKi users, there were significant differences for mean age at index (acalabrutinib=70; ibrutinib=68; zanubrutinib=70, P&lt;.0001), commercial insurance (acalabrutinib=34%; ibrutinib=42%; zanubrutinib=47%, P&lt;.0001), and baseline atrial fibrillation (acalabrutinib=1.94%; ibrutinib=1.24%; zanubrutinib=3.47%, P=0.0232). A total of 228 patients switched from ibrutinib to acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib. Adherence results suggested zanubrutinib had numerically better 1-year compliance ( P=0.2176) and treatment persistence at 1 and 2 years ( P=0.2687; P=0.6270) for patients who switched from ibrutinib to zanubrutinib or acalabrutinib (Table). HCRU showed that the mean (SD) outpatient visits (1.12 [1.67] vs 1.62 [3.17]; P=0.1755) and inpatient services (0.22 [0.68] vs 0.68 [3.12]; P=0.1693) were lower in patients switched from ibrutinib to zanubrutinib than acalabrutinib. Conclusions: In this study, zanubrutinib was associated with a trend towards improved compliance, persistence, and HCRU when used as the first BTKi and after prior ibrutinib. [Table: see text]

Real-world safety and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of lurbinectedin (lurbi) in patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Jazz EMERGE 402 updated analysis.

e23266 Background: Lurbi monotherapy received approval in multiple countries, including accelerated US FDA approval and conditional Health Canada approval for adults with metastatic (US) or stage III/metastatic (Canada) SCLC with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, based on a phase 2, open-label, single-arm trial (Trigo et al, Lancet Oncol 2020). Jazz EMERGE 402 (NCT04894591) is a phase 4 observational study assessing the effectiveness, safety profile, and HCRU of lurbi in pts with extensive-stage SCLC treated in real-world clinical settings. Here, we report updated safety data and HCRU. Methods: This study is enrolling pts with extensive-stage SCLC treated with lurbi according to the local approved label in the US and Canada. Results: Enrollment is ongoing with a target of 300 pts. Between 28JUN2021 and 27DEC2022, 105 pts were enrolled and followed for ≥6 months after the first dose of lurbi (data cutoff: 27JUN2023). The median (range) age was 67 (44-87) years; 72 (69%) pts had prior immunotherapy; 22 (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2; and 25 (24%) had central nervous system involvement. All pts received ≥1 cycle of lurbi; 56 (53%) as second-line (2L) and 37 (35%) as third-line (3L) therapy. The median (range) number of lurbi cycles was 4 (1-31) and the median (range) duration of exposure was 97 (21-694) days. Dose modifications occurred in 27 (26%) pts, with 17 (16%) requiring dose reductions. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 43 (41%) pts (34 [79%] as primary and 7 [16%] as secondary prophylaxis; 2 [5%] were unknown). At the time of data extraction, lurbi treatment was ongoing in 11 (10%) pts and 23 (22%) pts received subsequent anticancer therapy after lurbi. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 40 (38%) pts and treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) in 13 (12%) pts. The most common TRAEs were anemia (n = 13, 12%), neutropenia (n = 10, 10%), nausea (n = 8, 8%), and fatigue (n = 7, 7%). Thirty-six pts were hospitalized for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of 10 (4, 18) days (Table). No pts were hospitalized on the first day of treatment; 4 pts were hospitalized during the first 21-day cycle. The most common reasons for hospitalization were pneumonia (n = 10, 28%) and sepsis (n = 6, 17%; one was an SAE). Conclusions: In this phase 4 study, lurbi was well tolerated, with low rates of HCRU and a safety profile generally consistent with that reported in the phase 2 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04894591 . [Table: see text]

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs among Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy in Spain: A Single-Center, Real-World, Exploratory Study.

The objective of this observational, single-center, retrospective study conducted in a Spanish tertiary hospital was to describe the real-world (RW) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) who received chemotherapy (CT) or immunotherapy (IT) as first and second lines of treatment. A total of 173 patients diagnosed with aNSCLC and treated between January 2016 and August 2020 were included. The standardized average costs per patient/year were EUR 40,973.2 and EUR 22,502.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 140,601.3 and EUR 20,175.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The average annual costs per patient associated with adverse-event (AE) onset were EUR 29,939.7 and EUR 460.7 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 35,906.4 and EUR 3206.1 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The costs associated with disease management were EUR 33,178.0 and EUR 22,448.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 127,134.2 and EUR 19,663.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. In conclusion, IT use showed a lower average annual cost per patient, which was associated with lower HCRU for both disease and AE management, compared to the use of CT. However, these results should be further confirmed in the context of the currently implemented treatment schemes, including the combination of CT with single or dual IT.

Real-world biologic treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in psoriasis patients using an insurance claims database in Japan

Background With advent of newer treatments for psoriasis, real-world use of biologics in Japan is evolving. Methods This retrospective study utilized data from patients with ≥1 psoriasis-related biologic claims record between January 2016 and December 2020 in Japan to evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and associated costs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of 1,614 eligible patients, 72.5% were male, 29.2% had comorbid hypertension and 26.6% had comorbid cardiovascular disease. Interleukin (IL)-17 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors were commonly prescribed across lines of treatment, while IL-23 inhibitors were most considered for switches (92% of switches were from IL-12/23/IL-17/TNFα inhibitors). The overall mean adherence rate for all classes was 80.1%, but adherence varied across biologics. Infliximab and IL-23 inhibitor users exhibited optimal medical possession ratios, reflecting the best adherence rates. Overall HCRU (visits/patient-year) was 9.05 for outpatient visits, 0.09 for inpatient hospitalization, and 0.5 for psoriasis-related phototherapy. HCRU associated with hospitalization was slightly higher for bio-experienced patients and so was the overall costs per patient-year relative to bio-naïve patients. Conclusion Variable adherence rates observed suggest the need for improvement in treatment management with different biologics. Bio-experienced patients burdened by disease progression and treatment switches may result in increased HCRU.

Healthcare resource utilization of patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia initiating first line therapy of oral corticosteroids with or without rituximab.

This retrospective cohort study described real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) initiating treatment with first-line (1L) oral corticosteroids (OCS) + rituximab (R) compared to 1L OCS. Patients with a wAIHA diagnosis code (D59.11) between 8/2020-3/2022 were identified using US pharmacy and medical claims databases. Patients initiating 1L OCS ± R were identified (date of initiation = 'index date') with a 1-year pre-index period and a variable (minimum 1-year) follow-up period. The final sample comprised 77 1L OCS + R patients and 400 1L OCS patients (~ 60% female, mean age > 64 years). Over the 1-year follow-up, HCRU was higher in the OCS + R cohort with higher mean number of physician office visits (22.9 and 14.4; p < 0.01), including hematology/oncology office visits, and higher utilization of rescue therapy (59.7% and 33.3%; p < 0.01), driven by higher use of injectable corticosteroids. Patients in OCS + R and OCS groups completed 1L therapy after a similar mean duration of 103.5 and 134.6 days, respectively (p = 0.24). In the majority of patients, second-line (2L) therapy was initiated at a similar timepoint: 66.2% OCS + R and 72.0% OCS cohorts (p = 0.31) initiated 2L in a mean of 218.3 and 203.2 days (p = 0.76) after the end of 1L treatment, respectively. The addition of rituximab in 1L did not extend the remission period, with most patients in both cohorts initiating 2L therapy within less than 1 year of completing 1L treatment. 1L OCS + R patients also had substantial HCRU burden. More effective novel therapies are needed to address the high unmet need in wAIHA.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

The prognosis of early non-small-cell lung cancer (eNSCLC) remains poor. An understanding of current therapies and outcomes can provide insights into how novel therapies can be integrated into clinics. We conducted a large, retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients with de novo eNSCLC (stages IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA) diagnosed in Alberta, Canada, between 2010 and 2019. The primary objectives were to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes among patients with eNSCLC. A total of 5126 patients with eNSCLC were included. A total of 45.3% of patients were referred to a medical oncologist, ranging from 23.7% in stage IB to 58.3% in IIIA. A total of 23.6% of patients initiated systemic therapy (ST), ranging from 3.5% in stage IB to 38.5% in IIIA. For stage IIB and IIIA individuals who received surgery, adjuvant ST was associated with a decreased likelihood of death (hazard ratios (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56-1.07) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.89), respectively). In a Canadian real-world setting, stage IIB and IIIA patients who received adjuvant ST tended to have better survival than patients who did not, but future studies that provide adjustment of additional confounders are warranted. Examining referral pathways that account for disparities based on age, sex, and comorbidities in the real world would also provide further insights.

Real-World Disease Burden and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with COPD and Asthma Using Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) in the United States.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are associated with chronic inflammation of the respiratory tract; despite some overlap of symptoms, they are considered separate disorders. Triple therapy is recommended for patients with COPD and asthma whose symptoms remain uncontrolled despite dual therapy. There are limited real-world studies evaluating outcomes among patients with COPD and asthma who are receiving inhaled triple therapy. This United States (US)-based real-world study aimed to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes among patients with COPD and asthma receiving single-inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI]). Retrospective pre-post study using claims data from the Optum Clinformatics® database. Patients with COPD and asthma were indexed on the first date of FF/UMEC/VI prescription (1 October 2017-31 March 2019). Each patient acted as their own control. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months prior to (pre-treatment) and following (post-treatment) index. Exacerbations, all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared before and after FF/UMEC/VI initiation. Overall, 2743 patients were included (mean age: 71 years; 64% female). Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent comorbidity during both the pre- and post-treatment periods (90% for both periods). There was a lower proportion of patients with ≥1 COPD exacerbation or ≥1 asthma exacerbation post-treatment versus pre-treatment (51% vs 57%, p<0.0001, and 22% vs 32%, p<0.0001, respectively). Fewer patients had ≥1 all-cause office visit post-treatment versus pre-treatment (99.3% vs 99.7%, p=0.0329); more patients had ≥1 COPD-related office visit post-treatment versus pre-treatment (89.6% vs 87.5%, p=0.0035). Total all-cause healthcare costs were significantly higher post-treatment versus pre-treatment ($72,809 vs $63,734, p<0.0001). The driver of increased costs appeared to be primarily non-COPD-related (COPD-related costs: post-treatment $27,779 vs pre-treatment $25,081, p=0.0062). FF/UMEC/VI reduced exacerbations among patients with COPD and asthma in a real-world setting in the US.

EE660 Real-World Economic Burden and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Among Patients with Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in the United States

EE660 Real-World Economic Burden and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Among Patients with Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in the United States

RWD157 Assessment of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) in Patients with Lenalidomide-Refractory Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) from the US Optum Database

RWD157 Assessment of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) in Patients with Lenalidomide-Refractory Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) from the US Optum Database

S53 Comparison of Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Advanced Therapy-Experienced Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Vedolizumab

S53 Comparison of Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Advanced Therapy-Experienced Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Vedolizumab

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Initiating First-Line Treatment with Ibrutinib or Zanubrutinib

Background: A pivotal clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib with zanubrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) did not achieve its primary endpoint of complete response or very good partial response. In addition, median progression-free survival was not reached in either treatment arm. In the absence of treatment effectiveness differentiation based on clinical trial evidence, we conducted a real-world study to assess patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with WM who received ibrutinib or zanubrutinib as first-line (1L) therapy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the ConcertAI Database to collect claims data of patients with WM aged ≥18 years who initiated single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/day) or zanubrutinib (320 mg/day) as 1L therapy on or after 9/1/2021 (index date). A 6-month washout period of guideline-recommended WM antineoplastic agents was required to confirm 1L status. Patients were excluded if they were receiving ibrutinib and zanubrutinib concurrently, died within 30 days of the index date, had a record of hematopoietic stem cell transplant, had a record of other ibrutinib indications in the 6 months before index, or were participating in a clinical trial. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, therapy duration (number of days between the first and last day of the medication supply), and HRU (all-cause and WM-specific) per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were assessed. Results: The study included 51 patients (ibrutinib, n=30; zanubrutinib, n=21). In both cohorts, most participants were male (ibrutinib, n=20 [67%]; zanubrutinib, n=16 [76%]), and the mean age at baseline was 73 years and 75 years, respectively. At baseline, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0, and the WM-related and ibrutinib/zanubrutinib-related clinical events were similar between the two cohorts. While the zanubrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of infections (33% vs 3%) and musculoskeletal pain (24% vs 7%) at baseline, the ibrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of hypertension (20% vs 14%). The baseline prevalence of anemia was similar in both cohorts (ibrutinib, 27%; zanubrutinib, 29%). Mean follow-up was 6.9 months (ibrutinib) and 6.3 months (zanubrutinib). The mean ± SD duration of therapy was 152 ± 112 days (ibrutinib) and 113 ± 99 days (zanubrutinib; p=0.195). The ibrutinib cohort had a significantly lower all-cause HRU PPPM (4.53 ± 3.96 vs 8.53 ± 6.66, p=0.020) and lower WM-specific HRU PPPM (0.11 ± 0.26 vs 0.54 ± 1.14, p=0.104). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, patients with WM treated with 1L ibrutinib had a numerically longer duration of therapy and lower all-cause and WM-specific HRU PPPM, compared to those treated with 1L zanubrutinib. Due to a small sample size and short follow-up, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with cystectomy (CYS) in US patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

17 Background: CYS is strongly recommended for surgically eligible patients with MIBC following cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with significant surgery-related complications as well as meaningful health-related quality of life impacts. This study described real-world HRU and costs for patients with MIBC, overall and among those who had a CYS. Methods: Adults with MIBC were selected from de-identified IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (1/1/2010-2/28/2021) and Multi-State Medicaid Database (1/1/2010-12/31/2019). The index date was defined as the date of initiation of treatment with systemic therapy, radiotherapy, or CYS (used as proxies to identify MIBC) following the first observed bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis. HRU and costs (in 2021 US dollars) were reported per-patient-per-year (PPPY) from the index date to the earliest of metastatic BC, end of continuous insurance eligibility, or end of data. Results: Among 2,249 patients with MIBC (71% male, mean age 65 years, mean [median] follow up = 21 [13] months), 20.3% (N=456) had a CYS (75% male, mean age 63 years, mean [median] follow up = 24 [17] months). In the overall MIBC population, median all-cause total healthcare costs PPPY were $10,524 in the 12-month pre-index period, and $40,980 in the post-index period (Table) with 32% of total healthcare costs PPPY attributable to BC ($13,284). Post-index median all-cause total healthcare costs PPPY were 2.4 times higher among those with CYS ($97,824) relative to the overall MIBC population, with 67% of costs attributable to BC. Patients with CYS had higher all-cause and BC-related HRU PPPY in both inpatient and outpatient settings than the overall MIBC population (TABLE). In addition to the removal of the bladder, CYS surgeries frequently required alteration of other organ systems including prostate and seminal vesical for male; uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and anterior vaginal wall for female patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significant cost and healthcare resource burden associated with CYS in patients with MIBC and further illustrates the need for effective therapies that leave the bladder intact and avoid surgical removal or alteration of otherwise functional organ systems. [Table: see text]