Real-world Cohort Of Patients Research Articles

Association of Disease-Modifying Treatment With Outcome in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis and Isolated MRI Activity.

Isolated value of MRI metrics in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) as a surrogate marker of response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and, thus, as decision criteria for DMT escalation in the absence of clinical signs of disease activity is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMT escalation based on isolated MRI activity affects clinical outcome. Combining data from 5 MS centers in Austria and Switzerland, we included patients with RMS aged at least 18 years who (1) had initiated first-line, low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) continued for ≥12 months, (2) were clinically stable (no relapses or disability progression) on DMT for 12 months, (3) had MRI at baseline and after 12 months on DMT, and (4) had available clinical follow-up for ≥2 years after the second MRI. The primary endpoint was occurrence of relapse during follow-up. The number of new T2 lesions (T2L) and DMT strategy (continuing low-/moderate-efficacy DMT vs escalating DMT) were used as covariates in regression analyses. A total of 131 patients with RMS, median age of 36 (25th-75th percentiles: 29-43) years, 73% women, were included and observed over a median period of 6 (5-9) years after second MRI. Sixty-two (47%) patients had relapse. Patients who continued first-line DMT had a 3-fold increased risk of relapse given 2 new T2L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, lower limit [LL] of 95% CI: 1.5) and a 4-fold increased risk given ≥3 new T2L (HR 4.0, LL-CI: 2.1). Escalation of DMT lowered the risk of relapse in patients with 2 new T2L by approximately 80% (HR 0.2, upper limit [UL] of 95% CI: 1.3) and with ≥3 new T2L by 70% (HR 0.3, UL-CI: 0.8). In case of only 1 new T2L, the increased risk of relapse and the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance of 5%. In our real-world cohort of patients clinically stable under low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT, escalation of DMT based on isolated MRI activity decreased risk of further relapse when at least 2 new T2L had occurred. This study provides Class III evidence that clinically stable patients with MS on low-/moderate-efficacy DMT with ≥3 new T2L on MRI who escalate DMT have a reduced risk of relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale progression.

Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of nintedanib therapy in IPF patients with different phenotypes: A retrospective registry-based study

BackgroundThere is a lack of data on the long-term effect of nintedanib on survival in specific groups of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients with different phenotypes. We investigated the outcomes of nintedanib therapy in an observational study of a large multicentre real-world cohort of IPF patients with various initial characteristics. MethodsThe analysis included IPF patients treated with nintedanib (NIN) and IPF patients not receiving antifibrotic treatment (NAF) enrolled for the EMPIRE registry in 2015–2020. The patients were stratified according to their initial FVC predicted, dyspnoea, UIP pattern and age. All-cause mortality and annual rate of FVC decline were the main endpoints. Cox proportional hazards model for survival assessment and linear mixed-effects model for FVC decline modelling were used. ResultsA total of 869 NIN patients and 691 NAF patients were eligible for the analysis. The annual FVC decline rate was significantly different (adjusted values −0.053 l/yr vs −0.122 l/yr; p = 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0.40 (95 % CI 0.3 to 0.53, p < 0.001). The most significant effect of nintedanib was demonstrated in patients with impaired lung function, i.e., with an FVC predicted to be less than 80 % and a NYHA II to IV. Nintedanib therapy also reduced the difference in survival between men and women. ConclusionsModelling confirmed that NIN therapy reduced differences in OS between patients with better and worse initial conditions and prognosis. Our results indicate that NIN is particularly beneficial for patients with advanced IPF and more severe phenotypes. Trial registrationEMPIRE was registered as a non-interventional post-registration study at the State Institute for Drug Control of the Czech Republic under ID 1412080000 on December 8, 2014.

Can we counterbalance restricted access to innovation through specialized breast cancer care? The REAL-NOTE study

IntroductionThe KEYNOTE-522 (KN-522) trial showed that the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy improved pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) for patients with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We analyzed results of a real-world cohort of patients treated in a certified Breast Unit, before the introduction of pembrolizumab, to see if high quality care can match outcomes brought by the addition of an innovative anticancer therapy. MethodsObservational, retrospective, single-center cohort study, with real-world data from an ongoing institutional database with prespecified variables. Inclusion criteria matched the ones from KN-522: previously untreated stage II or III TNBC, diagnosed between 2012 and 2022, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were pCR at the time of definitive surgery and EFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. ResultsTotal of 168 patients were included, median age 55 years, 55 % received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dose dense anthracyclines and taxanes and 25 % carboplatin + paclitaxel, sequenced with dose dense anthracyclines. Most had Stage II disease (82.7 %), 47 % node + disease. pCR was achieved in 52.7 % cases. At 36 months, EFS was 83.3 % (95 % CI 75.1–89.0) and OS 89 % (95 % CI, 81.6 to 93.5). ConclusionsNotwithstanding the study limitations, outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy without immunotherapy were numerically similar to the experimental arm of KN-522 trial. These data highlight that providing care by a specialized multidisciplinary team in a certified unit might be just as impactful as the incorporation of new technologies.

Fibroblast activation protein and disease severity, progression, and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by progressive fibrosis in the lungs. Activated fibroblasts play a central role in fibrogenesis and express fibroblast activation protein α. A truncated, soluble form (sFAP) can be measured in blood and is a potential novel biomarker of disease activity. The aim was to study the association between sFAP and clinical, radiological, and histopathological measures of disease severity, progression, and survival in a prospective, multicentre, real-world cohort of patients with IPF. Patients with IPF were recruited from the tertiary interstitial lung disease centres in Denmark and followed for up to 3 years. Baseline serum levels of sFAP were measured by ELISA in patients with IPF and compared to healthy controls. Pulmonary function tests, 6-minute walk test and quality of life measures were performed at baseline and during follow-up. The study included 149 patients with IPF. Median sFAP in IPF was 49.6 ng/mL (IQR: 43.1-61.6 ng/mL) and in healthy controls 73.8 ng/mL (IQR: 62.1-92.0 ng/mL). Continuous sFAP was not associated with disease severity, progression or survival (p > 0.05). After dichotomization of sFAP below or above mean sFAP + 2 SD for healthy controls, higher levels of sFAP were associated with lower FVC % predicted during follow-up (p < 0.01). Higher than normal serum levels of sFAP were associated with longitudinal changes in FVC % predicted, but sFAP did not show clear associations with other baseline or longitudinal parameters. As such, sFAP has limited use as a biomarker of disease progression or survival in patients with IPF.

346MO Trastuzumab deruxctecan (T-DXd) associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in a large real-world French cohort of patients with HER2-driven breast cancer and other malignancies

346MO Trastuzumab deruxctecan (T-DXd) associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in a large real-world French cohort of patients with HER2-driven breast cancer and other malignancies

79P Comprehensive genomic profiling provides patients access to novel matched therapies in a diverse real-world cohort of advanced lung cancer patients

79P Comprehensive genomic profiling provides patients access to novel matched therapies in a diverse real-world cohort of advanced lung cancer patients

Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Adult Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study in a Real-World Cohort/GUARDIANS Project.

Combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care (SOC) for treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the RW safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in mRCC patients. Data were retrospectively collected from twelve cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with advanced or mRCC were eligible. The investigator-based objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of the treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were utilized where appropriate. In total, 96 eligible patients (66.6% male) with a median age of 66.0 years were included. The most common histology was clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) in 63.4% (n = 61). A prior nephrectomy was performed in 60.4% (n = 58). ECOG 0-1 was 68.8% (n = 66). A partial response was documented in 43.8% of patients (n = 42), a stable disease in 32.3% (n = 31), and a progressive disease in 8.3% (n = 8) as the best overall response. Response data were not evaluable in 13.5% (n = 13). The median follow-up time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.0-15.3). The PFS rate at 6 months was 89.8% in the overall population (86.8% for ccRCC; 90.0% for non-ccRCC). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 82.3% (n = 79) for all grades and 41.7% (n = 40) for grades 3-5. Elevated liver enzymes (34.4%), diarrhea (31.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (29.2%) were the three most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. In this real-world cohort of mRCC patients, the application of cabozantinib plus nivolumab was shown to be safe and feasible. Our data support the use of cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line standard therapy in mRCC patients. Major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up time of our study.

Patterns of Disease, Risk Factors, and Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Retrospective Report of a Real-World Patient Cohort From the United Arab Emirates

Patterns of Disease, Risk Factors, and Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Retrospective Report of a Real-World Patient Cohort From the United Arab Emirates

CLL-021 Patterns of Disease, Risk Factors, and Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Retrospective Report of a Real-world Patient Cohort From the United Arab Emirates

CLL-021 Patterns of Disease, Risk Factors, and Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Retrospective Report of a Real-world Patient Cohort From the United Arab Emirates

National Landscape of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Colon Cancer

IntroductionSurgery followed by pathology-guided adjuvant therapy is standard treatment for colon cancer. Data from the FOxTROT clinical trial showed potential benefit of a 6-wk neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in T3/T4 patients. The present study evaluated real-world outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in a national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer. Methods169,120 patients with clinical stage I, II, or III colon cancer from the National Cancer Database registry were included. Patients were categorized as having received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NACT), surgery then adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or surgery alone. Factors associated with treatment sequencing and outcomes were assessed. ResultsOf identified patients, 1.4% received NACT including 0.5% of stage I, 1.8% of stage II, and 3.0% of stage III. For stage I, 5-y overall survival (OS) was 74.7% after AC, 62.2% after NACT, and 76.4% after SA. For stage II, 5-y OS was 73.2% after AC, 66.8% after NACT, and 64.3% after SA. For stage III, 5-y OS was 67.3% after AC, 67.7% after NACT, and 42.4% after SA. Cox proportional-hazards model suggested NACT had worse outcomes versus AC in clinical stages I (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.85, P < 0.01) and II (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52, P < 0.01). In stage III, there was no difference in OS between NACT and AC (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.99-1.22, P = 0.05). ConclusionsIn a real-world national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer, NACT had no OS benefit over AC. Future studies should examine which subset of patients might benefit from neoadjuvant approaches.

Early versus late response to PD-1-based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) currently is the most effective treatment to induce durable responses in metastatic melanoma. The aims of this study are the characterization of patients with early, late and non-response to ICI and analysis of survival outcomes in a real-world patient cohort. MethodsPatients who received PD-1-based immunotherapy for non-resectable stage-IV melanoma in any therapy line were selected from the prospective multicenter real-world DeCOG study ADOREG-TRIM (NCT05750511). Patients showing complete (CR) or partial (PR) response already during the first 3 months of treatment (Early Responders, EarlyR) were compared to patients showing CR/PR at a later time (Late Responders, LateR), a stable disease (SD) and to patients showing progressive disease (Non-Responders, NonR). ResultsOf 522 patients, 8.2 % were EarlyR (n = 43), 19.0 % were LateR (n = 99), 37.0 % had a SD (n = 193) and 35.8 % were NonR (n = 187). EarlyR, LateR and SD patients had comparable baseline characteristics. Multivariate logbinomial regression analyses adjusted for age and sex revealed positive tumor PD-L1 (RR=1.99, 95 %-CI=1.14–3.46, p = 0.015), and normal serum CRP (RR=1.59, 95 %-CI=0.93–2.70, p = 0.036) as independently associated with the achievement of an early response compared to NonR. The median progression-free and overall survival was 46.0 months (95 % CI 19.1; NR) and 47.8 months (95 %-CI 36.9; NR) for EarlyR, NR (95 %-CI NR; NR) for LateR, 8.1 months (7.0; 10.4) and 35.4 months (29.2; NR) for SD, and 2.0 months (95 %-CI 1.9; 2.1) and 6.1 months (95 %-CI 4.6; 8.8) for NonR patients. ConclusionLess than 10 % of metastatic melanoma patients achieved an early response during the first 3 months of PD-1-based immunotherapy. Early responders were not superior to late responders in terms of response durability and survival.

Accuracy of MSBase criteria to diagnose secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in large German real-world patient cohort

Background and ObjectivesAccurate diagnosis of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a challenge since standardized criteria are missing. In 2016, the MSBase registry presented an algorithm that enabled the diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) more than three years earlier compared to diagnosis by neurologists. This work aimed to test whether this approach is equally effective in a real-world cohort of MS patients. MethodsThis longitudinal retrospective study analyzed clinical data of outpatients with MS recorded until October 2020 in the NeuroTransData registry, a Germany-wide network of 153 certified neurologists. Patient data had been captured in time during clinical visits employing a defined standardized clinical data set in the webbased NeuroTransData patient management platform DESTINY®. The time between the diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to SPMS onset was compared with one determined using MSBase criteria (MSBC). Group 1 consisted of patients diagnosed with SPMS during the observation period, whereas group 2 included RRMS patients who did not convert to SPMS during the observation period. ResultsOf 21,281 patients with MS included in our registry, 194 and 9506 patients were allocated to groups 1 and 2, respectively. 10.3% of patients with RRMS were diagnosed with SPMS simultaneously, whereas 60.8% were diagnosed with SPMS at least 3 months earlier by treating neurologists compared to the MSBC. In group 1, the MSBC showed a low sensitivity of 32.0% and an accuracy of 61.4% but a high specificity of 89.6%. In group 2, the MSBC identified 7.8% of patients with SPMS at some point during the observation time. Moreover, test-retest variability remains a challenge since 29.4% of patients diagnosed with SPMS by treating physicians did not fulfil the MSBC at a later point in time. DiscussionThese results are inconsistent with earlier SPMS diagnosis using the MSBC compared to clinical diagnosis by treating physicians. Therefore, there remains a need for an operational, structured, and validated approach to SPMS diagnosis.

Clinical profile, associated events and safety of vericiguat in a real-world cohort: The VERITA study.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical profile, associated events and safety of vericiguat in a real-world cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study is a prospective and observational cohort study of patients with HFrEF and recent HF worsening episodes requiring intravenous therapy who initiated vericiguat in an HF outpatient clinic. A subanalysis of patients with ≥6months' follow-up was performed separately. Out of 103 patients initially included, 52 had a follow-up of at least 6months (median follow-up of 303days). At baseline, the mean age was 71.3±9.4years, 27.2% were women, the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 34% (28%-39%) and 99% were taking beta-blockers, 96.1% sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, 95.1% sacubitril-valsartan, 90.3% aldosterone antagonists and 93.2% loop diuretics. During follow-up, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved (from 67.3% and 32.7% in classes III and II, respectively, to 22.4% and 75.5% at study end; P<0.001), as did the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (from 0.83±0.13 to 0.87±0.12, P=0.032, and from 60 to 79, P=0.005, respectively). Vericiguat was well tolerated (13.5% had symptomatic hypotension, and 11.5% had discontinued treatment), and 78.8% of patients achieved the target dose of 10mg. The number of HF-related hospitalizations/decompensations within the previous 12months was 2.3±1.4 and decreased with vericiguat to 0.79±1.14 (P<0.001). At study end, 7.7% died (50% for HF). In clinical practice, treatment with vericiguat is associated with substantial improvements in functional class and quality of life and a reduction in hospitalizations for HF, with a low risk of adverse effects.

Single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma evaluated by NGS: molecular landscape and efficacy of targeted therapies.

To describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB). This was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings. We included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9months (95% CI 2.4-19.5). We recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.

Analysis of the shorter drug survival times for Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a real-world cohort of axial spondyloarthritis patients - a retrospective analysis from the RHADAR network

In recent years Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have joined tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as approved disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) for moderate to severe forms of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Drug survival in axSpA patients has not been well studied in a real-world outpatient scenario since the approval of JAKi. We aimed to analyze the three drug classes based on modes of actions (MoA) for their persistence rates among German axSpA outpatients. A retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database for axSpA patients with a new initiation of TNFi, IL-17i, or JAKi treatment between January 2015 and October 2023 was conducted. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox regressions for drug discontinuation. 1222 new biological DMARD (TNFi [n = 954], IL-17i [n = 190]) or JAKi (n = 78) treatments were reported. The median drug survival was 31 months for TNFi, 25 for IL-17i, and 18 for JAKi. The corresponding 2-year drug survival rate was 79.6%, 72.6%, and 62.8% for TNFi, IL-17i, and JAKi, respectively. The probability for discontinuation for JAKi was significantly higher compared with TNFi (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.22–2.99]) as well as for IL-17i compared with TNFi (HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02–2.01]), possibly related to more frequent use of TNFis as first-line therapy. IL-17i and JAKi discontinuation probabilities were similar. Primary non-response was the reason for drug discontinuation in most cases across all MoA. TNFi treatment might persist longer than JAKi and IL-17i in German axSpA outpatients, possibly related to more severe or refractory disease in patients with JAKi-treated or IL-17i-treated axSpA.

Recurrences after nephron-sparing treatments of renal cell carcinoma: a competing risk analysis

PurposeTo examine associations between ablative therapy (AT) and partial nephrectomy (PN) and the occurrence of local recurrence (LR), distant metastatic recurrence (DMR) and all-cause mortality in a nation-wide real-world population-based cohort of patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (nmRCC).MethodsData on 2751 AT- or PN-treated nmRCC tumours diagnosed during 2005–2018, representing 2701 unique patients, were obtained from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register. Time to LR/DMR or death with/without LR/DMR was analysed using Cox regression models.ResultsDuring a mean of 4.8 years follow-up, LR was observed for 111 (4.0%) tumours, DMR for 108 (3.9%) tumours, and death without LR/DMR for 206 (7.5%) tumours. AT-treated tumours had a 4.31 times higher risk of LR (P < 0.001) and a 1.91 times higher risk of DMR (P = 0.018) than PN-treated, with no significant differences in risk of death without LR/DMR. During a mean of 3.2 and 2.5 years of follow-up after LR/DMR, respectively, 24 (21.6%) of the LR cases and 56 (51.9%) of the DMR cases died, compared to 7.5% in patients without LR/DMR. There were no significant differences between AT- and PN-treated regarding risks of early death after occurrence of LR or DMR.ConclusionAT treatment of patients with nmRCC implied significantly higher risks of LR and DMR compared with PN treatment. To minimize the risks of LR and DMR, these results suggest that PN is preferred over AT as primary treatment, supporting the EAU guidelines to recommended AT mainly to frail and/or comorbid patients.

Exploring the discrepancies between clinical trials and real-world data: A small-cell lung cancer study.

The potential of real-world data to inform clinical trial design and supplement control arms has gained much interest in recent years. The most common approach relies on reproducing control arm outcomes by matching real-world patient cohorts to clinical trial baseline populations. However, recent studies pointed out that there is a lack of replicability, generalisability, and consensus. In this article, we propose a novel approach that aims to explore and examine these discrepancies by concomitantly investigating the impact of selection criteria and operations on the measurements of outcomes from the patient data. We tested the approach on a dataset consisting of small-cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy regimens from a real-world data cohort (n = 223) and six clinical trial control arms (n = 1224). The results showed that the discrepancy between real-world and clinical trial data potentially depends on differences in both patient populations and operational conditions (e.g., frequency of assessments, and censoring), for which further investigation is required. Discovering and accounting for confounders, including hidden effects of differences in operations related to the treatment process and clinical trial study protocol, would potentially allow for improved translation between clinical trials and real-world data. Continued development of the method presented here to systematically explore and account for these differences could pave the way for transferring learning across clinical studies and developing mutual translation between the real-world and clinical trials to inform clinical study design.

The association of nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers with overall survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Pretreatment biomarkers are needed to identify patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) likely to have worse survival. This ensures that only patients with a real chance of benefit receive immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. In this study, we examined the associations of baseline nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers with overall survival in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients who received ICIs. We used prospectively collected data from the OncoLifeS data biobank. The cohort included 500 advanced-stage NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from May 2015 to June 2021. Biomarkers were evaluated within 2 weeks before ICI treatment: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP), Glasgow prognostic score, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and advanced lung cancer inflammation index. For each biomarker, low- and high-risk groups were defined using literature-based cut-offs. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using adjusted survival analysis. Most patients were male (60.8%), the mean baseline age was 65 ± 9 years, and 88% had stage IV disease. For each biomarker, low-risk patients had better overall survival (all, p < 0.001), with CAR and PNI showing the strongest associations. In multivariable analyses a combined CAR/PNI risk score had a stronger association with overall survival (aHR 3.09, 95% CI 2.36-4.06) than CAR alone (aHR 2.22, 95% CI 1.79-2.76) or PNI alone (aHR 2.09, 95% CI 1.66-2.61). These results highlight the potential value of nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers, in particular CAR and PNI, in identifying NSCLC patients with highest mortality risk before starting ICI treatment.

Spironolactone Reduces the Risk of Death in Veterans With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome increasing in prevalence and affecting millions worldwide but with limited evidence-based therapies. Results from explanatory clinical trials suggest that spironolactone may help to improve outcomes in patients with HFpEF. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of spironolactone in reducing death and hospitalization outcomes for patients with HFpEF in a real-world setting. We used electronic health records from the US Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system between 2002 and 2012 to identify patients with HFpEF who were followed longitudinally through 2014 using a validated algorithm. Among our HFpEF cohort that is 96% men, 85% White individuals, and aged 74±11 years, 3690 spironolactone users and 49 191 nonusers were identified and followed for a median of 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.4) and 3.3 (IQR, 1.6-5.9) years, respectively. We evaluated the effect of spironolactone use on all-cause death and number of days hospitalized per year for heart failure or for any cause by fitting generalized estimating equation-based Poisson and negative binomial models. Crude rates of 10.3 versus 13.5 deaths and 394.0 versus 485.9 days hospitalized were observed per 100 person-years for spironolactone users versus nonusers, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 21% reduction (95% CI, 13-29; P<0.0001) in rate of all-cause death among spironolactone users compared with nonusers and no statistically significant difference in days hospitalized for all causes or heart failure. In a real-world national cohort of patients with HFpEF, spironolactone use reduced all-cause death and demonstrated a favorable trend in reducing the burden of hospitalizations.