Real-time Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback Research Articles

Association of Real-Time Feedback and Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation Quality Delivered by Ambulance Personnel for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Background High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and includes chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compression fraction within international guideline recommendations. Previous studies have demonstrated divergent results of real-time feedback on CPR performance and patient outcomes. This study investigated the association between emergency medical service CPR quality and real-time CPR feedback for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods and Results This study collected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest data within the Capital Region of Denmark and compared CPR quality delivered by ambulance personnel. Data were collected in 2 consecutive phases from October 2018 to February 2020. Median chest compression depth was 6.0 cm (no feedback) and 5.9 cm (real-time feedback) (P=0.852). Corresponding proportion of guideline-compliant chest compressions for depth was 16.6% and 28.7%, respectively (P<0.001). Median chest compression rate per minute was 111 and 109 (P<0.001), respectively. Corresponding guideline adherence proportion for compression rate was 65.4% compared with 80.4% (P<0.001), respectively. Chest compression fraction was 78.9% compared with 81.9% (P<0.001), respectively. The combination of guideline-compliant chest compression depth and chest compression rate simultaneously was 8.5% (no feedback) versus 18.8% (feedback) (P<0.001). Improvements were not significant for return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio [OR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.84-1.39]), sustained return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.77-1.31]), or survival to hospital discharge (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.64-1.30]). Conclusions Real-time feedback was associated with improved guideline compliance for chest compression depth, rate, and fraction but not return of spontaneous circulation, sustained return of spontaneous circulation, or survival to hospital discharge. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04152252.

Comparison of the CPR Feedback Device Effect on the Effective Technique of the CPR in Two Modes of the Device Warning Being On and Off.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health problem with over 90% case fatality. Although it is known that good quality of cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) leads to improved patient outcomes, health care practitioners commonly perform sub-optimal CPR. The CPR feedback device is a small device designed to measure the number and depth of chest compressions (CC) and if the rate of compressions or the depth of the compressions is low or high, it will try to correct the CPR operation by announcing a warning to the resuscitator. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this device which was designed and made by the authors' technician study group member in improving CPR operations, to determine the need for it in all hospitals on a routine basis. This cross-sectional study was performed on patients who have suffered from cardio-pulmonary arrest in Al-Zahra Hospital in 2020. Patients needed primary CPR for any reason, were randomly divided into two groups using random allocation software. The first group contains patients as the CPR Feedback device is on and alarm is on and warns, if resuscitation is ineffective, the second group also uses the device, but with the difference that the alarm is off. The data was analyzed by general linear model method (repeated measure ANOVA). 80 patients were studied, including 63 men (79%) and 17 women (21%). Patients were divided among two groups. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between two groups. The results showed that there was no significant interaction between group and time for the compression depth variable and there was no significant difference in the depth of compressions between the two groups(P>0.05). For the rate of compressions, there was a significant interaction between group and time. These results indicate that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the number of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. The between-group effect which showed the difference in the number of compressions in the two groups, was statistically significant (P<0.001). These results indicated that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the rate of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. Therefore, the use of real-time CPR feedback device during chest compression in real-time CPR improves the quality of CPR.

Impact of an untrained CPR Coach in simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest: A pilot study

AimTo determine if an untrained cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) Coach, with no access to real-time CPR feedback technology, improves CPR quality. MethodsThis was a prospective randomized pilot study at a tertiary care children's hospital that aimed to integrate an untrained CPR Coach into resuscitation teams during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest. Simulation events were randomized to two arms: control (no CPR Coach) or intervention (CPR Coach). Simulations were run by pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) providers and video recorded. Scenarios focused on full cardiopulmonary arrest; neither team had access to real-time CPR feedback technology. The primary outcome was CPR quality. Secondary outcomes included workload assessments of the team leader and CPR Coach using the NASA Task Load Index and perceptions of CPR quality. ResultsThirteen simulations were performed; 5 were randomized to include a CPR Coach. There was a significantly shorter duration to backboard placement in the intervention group (median 20s [IQR 0–27s] vs. 52s [IQR 38–65s], p=0.02). There was no self-reported change in the team leader's workload between scenarios using a CPR Coach compared to those without a CPR Coach. There were no significant changes in subjective CPR quality measures. ConclusionsIn this pilot study, inclusion of an untrained CPR Coach during simulated CPR shortened time to backboard placement but did not improve most metrics of CPR quality or significantly affect team leader workload. More research is needed to better assess the value of a CPR Coach and its potential impact in real-world resuscitation.

Effect of Audiovisual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback Device on Improving Chest Compression Quality

The one month survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the paediatric population remains low. Improving survival in paediatric OHCA by enhancing the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important. In this study, we aimed to analyse the factors associated with CPR quality by using a real-time feedback device. Participants were prospectively divided into 4 groups: paediatric research fellows, paediatric residents, medical students (clerks), and paediatric critical care nurses. Then, the participants were asked to perform 5 cycles of CPR on a paediatric simulation manikin without prompts from feedback devices, and to repeat another 5 cycles of CPR after education with the 2015 paediatric advanced life support guidelines. A total of 75 participants were evaluated. In the overall analysis, an improvement in the percentage of participants meeting the target compression rate was observed (from 49.82% to 71.23%, P < 0.001). The percentage of participants achieving the target compression depth improved from 73.77% to 85.63% (P = 0.005). Among the 4 groups, the residents showed the most significant improvement in both compression rate (from 48.41% to 86.57%, P < 0.001) and compression depth (from 63.50% to 95.57%, P < 0.001). Inappropriate rate was a more important factor resulting in inadequate CPR performance than inappropriate depth. An excessive compression rate was also a common problem. In conclusions, the real-time CPR feedback device may help clinical physicians and nurses in improving the quality of chest compression. Excessive CPR compression rate may be a major cause of inadequate CPR performance.

Emergency Department Ergonomic Redesign Improves Team Satisfaction in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Delivery: A Simulation-Based Quality Improvement Approach.

Delivering high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires teams to administer highly choreographed care. The American Heart Association recommends audiovisual feedback for real-time optimization of CPR performance. In our Emergency Department (ED) resuscitation bays, ZOLL cardiac resuscitation device visibility was limited. To optimize the physical layout of our resuscitation rooms to improve cardiac resuscitation device visibility for real-time CPR feedback. A simulated case of cardiac arrest with iterative ergonomic modifications was performed four times. Variables included the locations of the cardiac resuscitation device and of team members. Participants completed individual surveys and provided qualitative comments in a group debriefing. The primary outcome of interest was participants' perception of cardiac resuscitation device visibility. The highest scoring layout placed the cardiac resuscitation device directly across from the compressor and mirrored the device screen to a television mounted at the head of the bed. Comparing this configuration to our standard configuration on a five-point Likert scale, cardiac resuscitation device visibility increased 46.7% for all team members, 150% for the team leader, and 179% for team members performing chest compressions. An iterative, multidisciplinary, simulation-based approach can improve team satisfaction with important clinical care factors when caring for patients suffering cardiac arrest in the ED.

Improving paediatric cardiac arrest outcomes: cpr quality improvement collaborative (CPR-QUIC)

Introduction: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend target values for selected CPR parameters related to rate and depth of chest compressions. International experts in resuscitation science have incorporated real-time CPR feedback into clinical practice and have demonstrated improved functional outcomes after cardiac arrest. Recent technological developments using accelerometer-based measurements incorporated into defibrillator systems, allow for real-time monitoring and feedback of CPR quality during resuscitation attempts. Aims: To improve the quality of CPR delivered to cardiac arrest patients in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) using defibrillators with real-time CPR feedback. To determine the association between quantitative CPR measures and patient outcomes after cardiac arrest. Methods: A bedside resuscitation training program was designed for the implementation of real-time CPR feedback devices. Medical and nursing staff were taught to interpret CPR metrics (depth and rate) on task trainers and CPR quality feedback training was incorporated into simulation-based education. Real-time CPR feedback technology was implemented in February 2019 and quantitative chest compression data was collected on all cardiac arrests in PICU. The data from each CPR event, metrics and time to defibrillation, was analysed. The arrest event data was reported to an international study collaborative to help determine the association between chest compression mechanics and patient outcomes. Results: Real-time CPR feedback used during resuscitation training improved staff performance. Since implementation, real-time CPR feedback was used in four arrest events and all patients survived to discharge from intensive care. The implementation of the project led to the standardisation of resuscitation training, cardiac arrest management and facilitated local process change within the PICU. Conclusion: We were the first institution in Australia to report paediatric cardiac arrest data for international benchmarking to improve patient outcomes after cardiac arrest. The CPR data collected provided objective feedback to resuscitation teams and guided training in order to improve performance.

Abstract 296: Quality Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation From Two Emergency Medical Service Systems Using a Feedback Device

Background: High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plays a critical role in the success of out-of-hospital resuscitation from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). AHA guidelines provide protocol to achieve recommended targets for CPR quality metrics including chest compression fraction (CCF), percentage of chest compressions (CCs) with full chest recoil, CC rate and CC depth. Our objective was to report the CPR quality of two emergency medical services (EMS) agencies with different basic life support (BLS) CPR protocols. Methods: Data from 673 patients, 2015 to 2017, suffering out-of-hospital SCA were obtained from Philips FR3 AEDs. The Philips Q-CPR tool was used for real-time CPR feedback, and CC waveforms were recorded for retrospective CPR analysis using Philips Event Review Pro 5.0 and custom software. The two EMS systems had BLS protocol differences: Site 1(King County, WA, n = 93) applied a compression - ventilation ratio of 30:2, while Site 2 (Mecklenburg County, NC, n = 580) applied 200 compressions in each CPR interval and ventilations were performed during CCs. Analyses were performed comparing CPR metrics between sites and to AHA targets. Results: There were 3,460 minutes of resuscitation data analyzed, representing the initial phase of resuscitation prior to ALS. The proportion of cases with shocks was 21.5% (20 of 93) for site 1 and 16.9% (98 of 580) for site 2 (p = 0.3). Both sites achieved guideline metrics though there were statistical differences (Table 1). Compared to site 1, site 2 was associated with a higher CCF, faster CC rate, but less CC depth on average (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: High quality CPR defined by AHA guidelines was achieved with both sites during the early phase of AED resuscitation though some differences were observed. Additional investigation should identify equipment, or rescuer characteristics that are important to consistently achieve high quality CPR and how the combination might be tailored to optimize individual patient outcome.

Real-Time Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback and Targeted Training Improve Chest Compression Performance in a Cohort of International Healthcare Providers.

Optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance is the foundation of successful cardiac arrest resuscitation. However, health care providers perform inadequate compressions. Better training techniques and real-time CPR feedback may improve compression performance. We sought to evaluate the impact of a targeted training program combined with real-time defibrillator CPR feedback on chest compression performance in an international cohort of health care providers. Physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and technicians from 6 hospitals in 5 countries (Taiwan, Singapore, China, Bahrain, and Kuwait) participated in a standardized resuscitation workshop. Chest compression was measured before and after didactics and activation of CPR feedback. Compressions were performed for 1min on standard CPR manikins placed on a hospital bed and backboard and measured using ZOLL R Series defibrillators. The percentage of compressions meeting target values for depth and rate were compared before and after the workshop and activation of real-time CPR feedback. No depth maximum was defined to allow for mattress compression. Chest compressions were more likely to meet targets for depth (71-95%, odds ratio [OR] 8.61 [95% confidence interval {CI} 4.42-16.77], p<0.001), rate (41-81%, OR 6.4 [95% CI 4.2-9.8], p<0.001), and both depth and rate (5-42%, OR 2.4 [95% CI 6.7-22.9], p<0.001) after the workshop and activation of real-time CPR feedback. A targeted training intervention combined with real-time CPR feedback improved chest compression performance among health care providers from various countries.

A better understanding of ambulance personnel's attitude towards real-time resuscitation feedback.

High-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) play a significant role in surviving cardiac arrest. Chest-compression quality can be measured and corrected by real-time CPR feedback devices, which are not yet commonly used. This article looks at the acceptance of such systems in comparison of equipped and unequipped personnel. Two groups of emergency medical services' (EMS) personnel were interviewed using standardized questionnaires. The survey was conducted in the German cities Dortmund and Münster. Overall, 205 persons participated in the survey: 103 paramedics and emergency physicians from the Dortmund fire service and 102 personnel from the Münster service. The staff of the Dortmund service were not equipped with real-time feedback systems. The test group of equipped personnel of the ambulance service of Münster Fire brigade uses real-time feedback systems since 2007. What is the acceptance level of real-time feedback systems? Are there differences between equipped and unequipped personnel? The total sample is receptive towards real-time feedback systems. More than 80% deem the system useful. However, this study revealed concerns and prejudices by unequipped personnel. Negative ratings are significantly lower at the Münster site that is experienced with the use of the real-time feedback system in contrast to the Dortmund site where no such experience exists-the system's use in daily routine results in better evaluation than the expectations of unequipped personnel. Real-time feedback systems receive overall positive ratings. Prejudices and concerns seem to decrease with continued use of the system.

Real-time CPR feedback and a targeted training intervention improve chest compression performance in an international cohort of healthcare providers

Background: Optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance is the foundation of successful resuscitation from cardiopulmonary arrest. Unfortunately, suboptimal performance of compressions is common among healthcare providers. Better training techniques and real-time CPR feedback may improve compression performance.

COMPARISON OF STANDARD CPR AND CPR FEEDBACK METHODS IN TERMS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHEST COMPRESSIONS DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

Objectives & BackgroundThe primary purpose of the study was to compare the metrics on the effectiveness of chest compressions obtained through an advanced CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) manikin and a real-time...

A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Objective: Many public access defibrillators (PADs) incorporate computer programs to provide audiovisual feedback to assist the user to deliver cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to current international guidelines. This usability study assessed if a PAD integrated with a real-time audiovisual CPR feedback system can guide lay-users to optimum chest compression rates, and if it is detrimental to chest compression depth. Methods: Randomly selected volunteers (15+ years) were recruited for two experiments. Experiment 1 $(n = 156)$ assessed the time taken to achieve the “good speed” audio prompt (i.e., perform compressions at a rate of 100–120 compressions/min) and chest compression fraction (CCF). Experiment 2 $(n = 140)$ assessed the effect of rate-only CPR feedback on chest compression depth. Two devices of the same model were used: one with CPR rate feedback and the other with CPR feedback disabled. The difference in compression depths and CCF was assessed. Results: Experiment 1: A total of 136 (87.2%) participants achieved “good speed” within 45 s with a mean CCF of 90.3% recorded. Experiment 2: The device with feedback lead to a mean (standard error—SE) depth of 24.61 mm (0.99) compared with 20.08 mm (0.96) for the feedback disabled device. Analysis of covariance provided a mean significant difference (SE) of 4.52 mm (1.38 mm; p -value = 0.001) favoring the device with CPR rate feedback. Conclusions: CPR rate-only feedback was not detrimental to chest compression depth and suggests rate-only feedback may improve compression depth. Significance: The incorporation of clear, intuitive, audiovisual CPR feedback systems can assist lay-users to optimize compression rates and maintain a high CCF.

Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role

AimMany healthcare providers rely on visual perception to guide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but little is known about the accuracy of provider perceptions of CPR quality. We aimed to describe the difference between perceived versus measured CPR quality, and to determine the impact of provider role, real-time visual CPR feedback and Just-in-Time (JIT) CPR training on provider perceptions. MethodsWe conducted secondary analyses of data collected from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 324 healthcare providers who participated in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario between July 2012 and April 2014. Participants were randomized to one of four permutations of: JIT CPR training and real-time visual CPR feedback. We calculated the difference between perceived and measured quality of CPR and reported the proportion of subjects accurately estimating the quality of CPR within each study arm. ResultsParticipants overestimated achieving adequate chest compression depth (mean difference range: 16.1–60.6%) and rate (range: 0.2–51%), and underestimated chest compression fraction (0.2–2.9%) across all arms. Compared to no intervention, the use of real-time feedback and JIT CPR training (alone or in combination) improved perception of depth (p<0.001). Accurate estimation of CPR quality was poor for chest compression depth (0–13%), rate (5–46%) and chest compression fraction (60–63%). Perception of depth is more accurate in CPR providers versus team leaders (27.8% vs. 7.4%; p=0.043) when using real-time feedback. ConclusionHealthcare providers’ visual perception of CPR quality is poor. Perceptions of CPR depth are improved by using real-time visual feedback and with prior JIT CPR training.

Abstract 275: Automated External Defibrillator with Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback System Improves the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Background: Public access defibrillation (PAD) with automated external defibrillator (AED) is a widely available and beneficial intervention for cardiac arrest. The quality of chest compressions (CC) is an important determinant of the outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In Japan, AED with real-time audiovisual feedback is being implemented, and has been available to bystanders since 2011. However, the benefit of CC feedback systems for laypersons remains unclear. In this study, we sought to determine the effects of audiovisual feedback system on the quality of CC in bystanders with different medical backgrounds. Methods: A total of 478 individuals (151 healthcare professionals [mean age, 31.3 years], 76 medical students [mean age, 23.6 years], and 251 non-healthcare professionals [mean age, 40.1 years]) participated in a CPR quality improvement challenge. Participants performed two 2-min trials of CC on a training manikin equipped with an accelerometer-based system for measuring both rate and depth of CC. Real-time audiovisual feedback was disabled during first trial, but activated during the second trial. The quality of CC was evaluated by counting the number of compressions with the appropriate depth (5.0-10 cm) and rate (100-120 cpm) in each trial. Results: Among all participants, mean depth of CC was higher (6.35 vs. 5.87 cm), and mean rate was lower (102.4 vs. 112.2 cpm) when the feedback system was activated than when it was disabled (p &lt; 0.05). When real-time feedback was activated, non-healthcare professional participants performed CC of greater depth (6.41 vs. 5.63 cm) than healthcare professionals (6.25 vs. 6.09 cm) and medical students (6.34 vs. 6.19 cm) (p &lt; 0.05). The quality index of CC, which the percentage of adequate depth and rate, was also significantly improved regardless medical backgrounds (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: The use of real-time CPR feedback systems improves the quality of CC performed by individuals of all backgrounds, especially non-healthcare personnel. PAD with AED providing CPR feedback technologies may elevate the survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and increase the likelihood of favorable outcomes.

The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: A cohort study: trial protocol

BackgroundCardiac arrest affects 30-35, 000 hospitalised patients in the UK every year. For these patients to be given the best chance of survival, high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be delivered, however the quality of CPR in real-life is often suboptimal. CPR feedback devices have been shown to improve CPR quality in the pre-hospital setting and post-event debriefing can improve adherence to guidelines and CPR quality. However, the evidence for use of these improvement methods in hospital remains unclear. The CPR quality improvement initiative is a prospective cohort study of the Q-CPR real-time feedback device combined with post-event debriefing in hospitalised adult patients who sustain a cardiac arrest.Methods/designThe primary objective of this trial is to assess whether a CPR quality improvement initiative will improve rate of return of sustained spontaneous circulation in in-hospital-cardiac-arrest patients. The study is set in one NHS trust operating three hospital sites. Secondary objectives will evaluate: any return of spontaneous circulation; survival to hospital discharge and patient cerebral performance category at discharge; quality of CPR variables and cardiac arrest team factors. Methods: All three sites will have an initial control phase before any improvements are implemented; site 1 will implement audiovisual feedback combined with post event debriefing, site 2 will implement audiovisual feedback only and site 3 will remain as a control site to measure any changes in outcome due to any other trust-wide changes in resuscitation practice. All adult patients sustaining a cardiac arrest and receiving resuscitation from the hospital cardiac arrest team will be included. Patients will be excluded if; they have a Do-not-attempt resuscitation order written and documented in their medical records, the cardiac arrest is not attended by a resuscitation team, the arrest occurs out-of-hospital or the patient has previously participated in this study. The trial will recruit a total of 912 patients from the three hospital sites.ConclusionThis trial will evaluate patient and process focussed outcomes following the implementation of a CPR quality improvement initiative using real-time audiovisual feedback and post event debriefing.Trial registrationISRCTN56583860