Real Casework Samples Research Articles

Internal validation of the Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR panel v2 kit with locus-specific analytical threshold, and with special regard to mixtures and low template DNA detection

We performed an internal laboratory validation of the Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR panel v2 kit to assist the introduction of the technology into the routine forensic casework practice. The study was designed and evaluated based not only on the key validation standards like sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, repeatability, mixture, and concordance, but we also tested the effect of reduced input DNA, we measured and applied locus-specific analytical threshold values, tested two different PCR cycle conditions, sequence artifacts and stutters were also analysed. During the study we also tested the new method on real casework samples. The sensitivity study confirmed that adding 500 pg template DNA for library preparation can be optimal at base PCR cycle number (that was 24), because the measured average heterozygote balance was not lower than 0.82, and each allele was detected above the analytical threshold. However, contrary to previous communications, increasing the PCR cycle numbers up to 28 has not resulted the significant elevation of the heterozygote imbalance. According to our results, raised PCR cycle condition (i.e. 28) is appropriate at or below 150 pg total input DNA. For most loci, the calculated AT was lower than the manufacturer’s recommended. Applying the newly established ATs with raised PCR cycle conditions the allele detection sensitivity and reliability increased. We observed allele dropouts only at the 15 pg template DNA experiments with 5 % frequency, that is better to previously published studies. This result indicates that this low amount of DNA (i.e. 15 pg) could be a minimum limit of template input for a potentially successful analysis. In the mixture study the minor contributor could be detected up to 1:19 mixture ratio. We detected minor alleles in all measurements and concentrations above the threshold if the template DNA were fixed and only SNP differences were observed between the same alleles of the contributors. To test concordance between the new method and traditional STR genotyping we analysed 58 Hungarian individual samples in parallel. Nearby the detected 248 different length-based alleles on the 31 loci in the sample pool we revealed additional 75 sequence variant alleles, that represent an approximately 23 % increase in the total number of observed alleles. The casework study confirmed that the Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR panel v2 kit is effective even in genotyping degraded samples with extremely low levels of DNA, if we apply elevated cycle number for library preparation and use locus-specific analytical thresholds.

An innovative approach for low input forensic DNA sample analysis using the GlobalFiler™ IQC PCR amplification Kit on the Magelia® platform

Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers have been the gold standard for human identification testing in the forensic field for the last few decades. The GlobalFiler™ IQC PCR amplification Kit has shown sensitivity, high power of discrimination and is therefore widely used. Samples with limited DNA quantities remain a significant hurdle for streamlined human forensic identification. Reaction volume reduction in a closed system paired with automation can provide solutions to secure DNA profiles when routine methods fall short. We automated and optimized the GlobalFilerTM IQC PCR Amplification Kit on the Magelia®, a closed molecular biology platform, to test whether reaction volume reduction in a confined automated system would improve signal and sensitivity. We evaluated the platform’s performance using reference and real casework samples (blood, cigarette butt, saliva and touch DNA) in the context of a 5-fold volume reduction when compared to the routine protocol. This strategy showed distinct advantages over standard treatment, notably increased signal for lower DNA inputs. Importantly, negative casework samples through routine treatment yielded “usable” DNA profiles after amplification using this strategy. This novel approach represents a first proof of concept for a method enabling users to treat limited samples, or to partition routine samples for multiple analyses.

The Usefulness of qPCR Data for Sample Pre-Assessment and Interpretation of Genetic Typing Results.

DNA quantification is a crucial step in the STR typing workflow for human identification purposes. Given the reaction's nature, qPCR assays may be subjected to the same stochastic effects of traditional PCR for low-input concentrations. The study aims to evaluate the precision of the PowerQuant® (Promega) kit assay measurements and the degree of variability for DNA templates falling below the optimal threshold of the PowerPlex® ESX-17 Fast STR typing kit (Promega). Five three-fold dilutions of the 2800 M control DNA (Promega) were set up. Each dilution (concentrations: 0.05, 0.0167, 0.0055, 0.00185, and 0.000617 ng/µL) was quantified and amplified in four replicates. Variability for qPCR results, STR profile completeness, and EPGs' peak height were evaluated. The qPCR-estimated concentration of casework samples was correlated with profile completeness and peak intensity, to assess the predictive value of qPCR results for the successful STR typing of scarce samples. qPCR was subjected to stochastic effects, of which the degree was inversely proportional to the initial input template. Quantitation results and the STR profile's characteristics were strongly correlated. Due to the intrinsic nature of real casework samples, a qPCR-derived DNA concentration threshold for correctly identifying probative STR profiles may be difficult to establish. Quantitation data may be useful in interpreting and corroborating STR typing results and for clearly illustrating them to the stakeholders.

Utilizing differential extraction thresholds to deduce the existence of spermatozoa in forensic casework samples

Testing of evidence in an alleged sexual assault case not only seeks to address the question of who was involved, but also looks to answer the question of what biological source provided the DNA. It can be difficult to obtain positive serological data on challenging samples such as laundered items, low-level DNA samples, or sexual assault kit swabs obtained after a prolonged interval from the time of assault. In the absence of confirmatory serological results, an expert witness often cannot speak to the biological source of the DNA. In order to determine quantitation thresholds which could be used to deduce the presence of spermatozoa (sperm) within a sample, we evaluated the fractionation of male DNA utilizing our laboratory’s differential extraction method. Study samples included serial dilutions of semen and semen/saliva mixtures, post-coital and laundered samples as well as casework data from 1,729 samples that were processed using a differential extraction. Based on this data, it was determined that a sample which had at least 200 picograms of male DNA and at least 10% of the total male DNA in fraction 2 (F2, also known as the sperm-enriched or sperm fraction) could be reported as positive for the presence of sperm. No false positive results were obtained from the study-generated samples when using these thresholds to infer the presence of sperm. Additionally, samples that contained sperm, but were negative using traditional serological methods, could be detected. However, not all sperm-containing samples fractionated above both thresholds; therefore, serological testing may still be necessary to minimize false negative results. The thresholds developed here, proved reliable to deduce the presence of sperm in real casework samples.

Use of the Investigator ESSplex SE QS Kit (QIAGEN) at Half PCR Reaction Volumes for the Analysis of Forensic Samples

The Investigator ESSplex SE QS Kit (Qiagen) is a next-generation polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit that, in 60 min, amplifies 17 Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers, including the five European Standard Set (ESS) loci (D10S1248, D12S391, D1S1656, D22S1045, D2S441), the SE33 marker, and the locus Amelogenin for sex determination. Two quality sensors (QS1 and QS2) are also co-amplified to check PCR performance. Since forensic laboratories carry out hundreds of DNA typings annually, we verified the kit’s performance using half reaction volumes with the aim of improving the number of samples that may be amplified with a single kit and consequently reducing laboratory costs. In the present study, intended as a technical note rather than internal validation, some control samples (oral swabs) with known DNA profiles and 40 real casework samples were analyzed. We observed that reducing the total reaction volume, while keeping all component ratios unaltered, yields DNA profiles comparable to those obtained using standard reaction volumes and with allele peaks higher than those with regular volumes. Using half volumes for PCR amplification enables the analysis of a larger number of samples compared to the standard protocol, thereby reducing laboratory costs without compromising the quality of the analysis.

Statistical analysis tools of mixture DNA samples: When the same software provides different results

The high complexity of the genetic analysis of crime scene samples is mainly related to the unknown number of contributors, low DNA quantity and quality, and associated stochastic effects. The difficulty and subjectivity of interpreting casework samples was the motto for the development of software to mitigate these conditions and allow the quantification of the genetic evidence. Currently, there are several tools for statistical analysis of mixture samples based on either qualitative or quantitative models. The first considers the electropherograms’ qualitative information, while the latter also considers the associated quantitative information. This work’s main goal was to evaluate the effect that parameters’ settings variation may have on the LR computation, specifically the drop-in frequency parameter. For that, a qualitative – LRmix Studio – and two quantitative software – STRmix™ and EuroForMix – were considered and an intra-software analysis was performed, using as input real casework samples. The drop-in frequency variation showed an impact, leading to differences higher than four units (log10 scale) for some pairs of samples. In addition, for some cases, no comparisons were performed either because the tool computed a null LR value or displayed an error message. Thus, this work reinforces the importance of proper parameters’ modeling and estimation in forensic casework evaluation.

Dead migrants in the Mediterranean: genetic analysis of bone samples exposed to seawater

In April 2015, a fishing boat that departed from Libya with about 1,000 migrants on board sank in the Mediterranean Sea. Most of the migrants were packed in the hull of the boat and drowned in the shipwreck. After fifteen months, the ship was recovered from the seabed and brought to a Sicilian naval area for forensic investigations. Skeletal remains belonging to more than 700 people were retrieved. A selected sample composed of 80 victims was considered in order to evaluate the possibility of achieving genetic profiles useful for a positive identification from these challenging specimens. The molecular features of the DNA recovered from a significant number of real casework samples exposed to seawater for long periods of time were described for the first time. Three different DNA extraction protocols and three different commercial kits were employed in order to generate genetic profiles based on the characterization of 21 autosomal STR loci. The combination of multiple DNA extractions and the cross-checking of multiple PCR amplifications with different kits allowed to obtain reliable genetic profiles characterized by at least 16 STR markers in more than 70% of the samples. The factors that could have affected the different quality of the genetic profiles were investigated and the bone preservation was examined through microscopic and macroscopic analyses. The approach presented in this study could be useful in the management of the genetic analysis of bone samples collected in other similar DVI scenarios. The genetic profiles recovered from the bone samples will be compared in kinship analysis to putative relatives of the victims collected in Africa in order to obtain positive identifications.

Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples

To overcome the multifactorial complexity associated with the analysis and interpretation of the capillary electrophoresis results of forensic mixture samples, probabilistic genotyping methods have been developed and implemented as software, based on either qualitative or quantitative models. The former considers the electropherograms’ qualitative information (detected alleles), whilst the latter also takes into account the associated quantitative information (height of allele peaks). Both models then quantify the genetic evidence through the computation of a likelihood ratio (LR), comparing the probabilities of the observations given two alternative and mutually exclusive hypotheses.In this study, the results obtained through the qualitative software LRmix Studio (v.2.1.3), and the quantitative ones: STRmix™ (v.2.7) and EuroForMix (v.3.4.0), were compared considering real casework samples. A set of 156 irreversibly anonymized sample pairs (GeneMapper files), obtained under the scope of former cases of the Portuguese Scientific Police Laboratory, Judiciary Police (LPC-PJ), were independently analyzed using each software. Sample pairs were composed by (i) a mixture profile with either two or three estimated contributors, and (ii) a single contributor profile associated. In most cases, information on 21 short tandem repeat (STR) autosomal markers were considered, and the majority of the single-source samples could not be a priori excluded as belonging to a contributor to the paired mixture sample. This inter-software analysis shows the differences between the probative values obtained through different qualitative and quantitative tools, for the same input samples. LR values computed in this work by quantitative tools showed to be generally higher than those obtained by the qualitative. Although the differences between the LR values computed by both quantitative software showed to be much smaller, STRmix™ generated LRs are generally higher than those from EuroForMix. As expected, mixtures with three estimated contributors showed generally lower LR values than those obtained for mixtures with two estimated contributors.Different software products are based on different approaches and mathematical or statistical models, which necessarily result in the computation of different LR values. The understanding by the forensic experts of the models and their differences among available software is therefore crucial. The better the expert understands the methodology, the better he/she will be able to support and/or explain the results in court or any other area of scrutiny.

Evaluation of the Ion AmpliSeq™ PhenoTrivium Panel: MPS-Based Assay for Ancestry and Phenotype Predictions Challenged by Casework Samples.

As the field of forensic DNA analysis has started to transition from genetics to genomics, new methods to aid in crime scene investigations have arisen. The development of informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers has led the forensic community to question if DNA can be a reliable “eye-witness” and whether the data it provides can shed light on unknown perpetrators. We have developed an assay called the Ion AmpliSeq™ PhenoTrivium Panel, which combines three groups of markers: 41 phenotype- and 163 ancestry-informative autosomal SNPs together with 120 lineage-specific Y-SNPs. Here, we report the results of testing the assay’s sensitivity and the predictions obtained for known reference samples. Moreover, we present the outcome of a blind study performed on real casework samples in order to understand the value and reliability of the information that would be provided to police investigators. Furthermore, we evaluated the accuracy of admixture prediction in Converge™ Software. The results show the panel to be a robust and sensitive assay which can be used to analyze casework samples. We conclude that the combination of the obtained predictions of phenotype, biogeographical ancestry, and male lineage can serve as a potential lead in challenging police investigations such as cold cases or cases with no suspect.

Internal validation of GlobalFilerTM kit using reduced reaction volume

For approximately two decades, Microsatellites or Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers have been the backbone for human identification testing in the forensic field. The expansion of STR multiplex kits can improve global sharing of STR profiles, rapid DNA typing, and DNA typing Flores et al. (2014). GlobalFiler™ kit is highly sensitive and has extremely high power of discrimination. An internal validation of GlobalFiler™ Kit was carried out to test the robustness of this kit through a range of internal validation studies including half volume reaction, reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, stability, mixture, analytical threshold, sensitivity & stochastic threshold, heterozygous balance & stutter threshold studies in accordance with SGWDAM guidelines Scientific Working Group on DNA . Reference and real casework samples previously tested using other autosomal STR kits from forensic cases were used during the validation. It was demonstrated that the GlobalFiler™ kit has enhanced discrimination power, is robust and extremely useful for forensic casework.

Forensic differentiation between peripheral and menstrual blood in cases of alleged sexual assault\u2014validating an immunochromatographic multiplex assay for simultaneous detection of human hemoglobin and D-dimer

Sexual assault is a serious offense and identification of body fluids originating from sexual activity has been a crucial aspect of forensic investigations for a long time. While reliable tests for the detection of semen and saliva have been successfully implemented into forensic laboratories, the detection of other body fluids, such as vaginal or menstrual fluid, is more challenging. Especially, the discrimination between peripheral and menstrual blood can be highly relevant for police investigations because it provides potential evidence regarding the issue of consent. We report the forensic validation of an immunochromatographic test that allows for such discrimination in forensic stains, the SERATEC PMB test, and its performance on real casework samples. The PMB test is a duplex test combining human hemoglobin and D-dimer detection and was developed for the identification of blood and menstrual fluid, both at the crime scene and in the laboratory. The results of this study showed that the duplex D-dimer/hemoglobin assay reliably detects the presence of human hemoglobin and identifies samples containing menstrual fluid by detecting the presence of D-dimers. The method distinguished between menstrual and peripheral blood in a swab from a historical artifact and in real casework samples of alleged sexual assaults. Results show that the development of the new duplex test is a substantial progress towards analyzing and interpreting evidence from sexual assault cases.

Isolation and genetic analysis of pure cells from forensic biological mixtures: The precision of a digital approach

Latest genotyping technologies allow to achieve a reliable genetic profile for the offender identification even from extremely minute biological evidence. The ultimate challenge occurs when genetic profiles need to be retrieved from a mixture, which is composed of biological material from two or more individuals. In this case, DNA profiling will often result in a complex genetic profile, which is then subject matter for statistical analysis.In principle, when more individuals contribute to a mixture with different biological fluids, their single genetic profiles can be obtained by separating the distinct cell types (e.g. epithelial cells, blood cells, sperm), prior to genotyping.Different approaches have been investigated for this purpose, such as fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) or laser capture microdissection (LCM), but currently none of these methods can guarantee the complete separation of different type of cells present in a mixture.In other fields of application, such as oncology, DEPArray™ technology, an image-based, microfluidic digital sorter, has been widely proven to enable the separation of pure cells, with single-cell precision.This study investigates the applicability of DEPArray™ technology to forensic samples analysis, focusing on the resolution of the forensic mixture problem.For the first time, we report here the development of an application-specific DEPArray™ workflow enabling the detection and recovery of pure homogeneous cell pools from simulated blood/saliva and semen/saliva mixtures, providing full genetic match with genetic profiles of corresponding donors. In addition, we assess the performance of standard forensic methods for DNA quantitation and genotyping on low-count, DEPArray™-isolated cells, showing that pure, almost complete profiles can be obtained from as few as ten haploid cells. Finally, we explore the applicability in real casework samples, demonstrating that the described approach provides complete separation of cells with outstanding precision.In all examined cases, DEPArray™ technology proves to be a groundbreaking technology for the resolution of forensic biological mixtures, through the precise isolation of pure cells for an incontrovertible attribution of the obtained genetic profiles.

Whole genome nucleosome sequencing identifies novel types of forensic markers in degraded DNA samples

In the case of mass disasters, missing persons and forensic caseworks, highly degraded biological samples are often encountered. It can be a challenge to analyze and interpret the DNA profiles from these samples. Here we provide a new strategy to solve the problem by taking advantage of the intrinsic structural properties of DNA. We have assessed the in vivo positions of more than 35 million putative nucleosome cores in human leukocytes using high-throughput whole genome sequencing, and identified 2,462 single nucleotide variations (SNVs), 128 insertion-deletion polymorphisms (indels). After comparing the sequence reads with 44 STR loci commonly used in forensics, five STRs (TH01, TPOX, D18S51, DYS391, and D10S1248)were matched. We compared these “nucleosome protected STRs” (NPSTRs) with five other non-NPSTRs using mini-STR primer design, real-time PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis on artificially degraded DNA. Moreover, genotyping performance of the five NPSTRs and five non-NPSTRs was also tested with real casework samples. All results show that loci located in nucleosomes are more likely to be successfully genotyped in degraded samples. In conclusion, after further strict validation, these markers could be incorporated into future forensic and paleontology identification kits, resulting in higher discriminatory power for certain degraded sample types.

SNPforID 52-plex in casework samples: “Cracking” bones and other difficult samples

Casework samples can present difficulties to forensic scientists in criminal and identification investigations. Some challenging samples like bones, teeth and crime scene samples, often contain low DNA quantity which can even be degraded. In these cases, obtained STR profiles are many times incomplete or even null. This is partly due to relative bigger size of commonly used STRs in forensic analysis. In order to bypass this problem, other strategies of analysis have been developed in the past based on mini-STRs and biallelic markers, such as Indels and SNPs. Although each marker type has its advantages and disadvantages, SNPs benefit from the fact of having smaller amplification products and its analysis can be realized analyzing simultaneously a great number of loci using large multiplexes. One of such multiplex is SNPforID 52-plex which analyzes 52 loci, providing good results, as reported by some authors. Taking this in consideration, we compared the amplification success of 53 real casework samples from our casuistic consisting of bones, teeth and other samples using the 52-plex and the Identifier® Plus kit. Mean amplification success rate by loci was of 73% and 43% respectively and 16 out of 36 samples in which STR profiles were not obtained or in which these were poor, generated complete or almost complete SNP profiles. We conclude that the 52-plex can be a valuable tool in the analysis of different types of challenging forensic samples when STRs fail to provide necessary genetic information for identification.

Further validation of a multiplex STR system for use in routine forensic identity testing

A polymerase chain reaction- (PCR) based short tandem repeat (STR) system has recently been developed for use in routine forensic identity testing [1]. The methodology involves the simultaneous amplification of alleles at four loci on different chromosomes, followed by the fluorescent detection of products using an automated DNA sequencer. The adoption of this technology into operational casework offers several advantages over systems currently in use, particularly the ability to obtain results from very old or small samples, reduced operator time when compared with conventional DNA (single locus probe) analysis and the potential for automation. Validation studies were incorporated into the development work on this system [2,11]. The scope of these studies has been extended by further investigation carried out in this laboratory to test the reliability of the system under normal operational procedures. It was demonstrated that the precision of size determination was sufficient for the discrimination of alleles and size windows for allelic designation were established. A collaborative exercise carried out in conjunction with two independent laboratories demonstrated the robustness of allelic designation. Having tested both the DNA quantification and amplification techniques against DNA samples from a wide range of animal and microbial species, it was confirmed that results are only obtained from higher primate DNA. The PCR methodology was tested with both simulated and real casework samples (over 250 in total). Reportable results were obtained from most items yielding extracted DNA. Approximately 20% of the casework items from which no grouping (ABO, PGM) nor SLP results were obtained, gave reportable STR results. A method for the routine purification of DNA extracts which failed to amplify was established and validated for use in forensic casework. The STR multiplex system developed by Kimpton et al. [1] proved robust and reliable when tested under the operational procedures in place in this laboratory.