Readmission Rates Research Articles

Ambulatory management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AmbUDiv study): a multicentre, propensity score matching study

Abstract Introduction Recent studies have suggested that ambulatory management is feasible for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD); however, there is still no consensus regarding the most appropriate management settings. This study presents a multi-centre experience of managing patients presenting with AUD, specifically focusing on clinical outcomes and comparing ambulatory treatment with in-patient management. Methods A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted across four hospitals in the UK and included all adult patients with computed tomography (CT) confirmed (Hinchey grade 1a) acute diverticulitis over a 12-month period (January – December 2022). Patient medical records were followed up for 1-year post-index episode, and outcomes were compared between those treated through the ambulatory pathway versus inpatient treatment using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). All statistical analysis was performed using the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 4.4. Results A total of 348 patients with Hinchey 1a acute diverticulitis were included (260 in-patients; 88 ambulatory pathway), of which nearly a third (31.3%) had a recurrent disease. Inpatient management was dominant (74.7%), with a median of 3 days of hospital stay. PSM resulted in 172 patients equally divided between the two care settings. Ambulatory management was associated with a lower readmission rate (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.08 after PSM), comparable surgical (P = 0.57 before PSM, 0% in both groups after PSM) and radiological interventions (P = 0.99 before and after PSM) within one year. In both matched and non-matched groups, a strong association between readmissions and inpatient management was noted in univariate analysis (P = 0.03 before PSM, P = 0.04 after PSM) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.03 after PSM). Conclusion Our study supports the safety and efficacy of managing patients with AUD through a well-designed ambulatory care pathway. In particular, hospital re-admission rates are lower and other outcomes are non-inferior to in-patient treatment. This has implications for substantial cost-savings and better utilisation of limited healthcare resources.

Abstract A026: Assessing the impact of obesity on postoperative outcomes in RCC using machine learning

Abstract Introduction Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but paradoxically correlates with improved outcomes in metastatic cases. Moreover, the data on the relationship between obesity and postoperative outcomes following nephrectomy are inconsistent. Accurate prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, 30-day readmissions, and mortality, is essential for improving patient outcomes in surgical procedures. In this study, we utilized ML models to predict such outcomes in RCC patients undergoing nephroureterectomy, radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, and other excision procedures on the kidney using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP; 2016- 2021). Methods A gradient-boosted tree (GBT) ML model was developed and trained to predict the primary outcomes of interest: major complications, minor complications, 30-day readmission, and mortality. Patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were considered obese, and patients with a BMI <30 kg/m2 were used as controls. The model's performance was rigorously evaluated using various measures, such as AUROC, generalized R-square, and misclassification rate. The model's predictions were validated using separate training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts to ensure generalizability and applicability in diverse patient populations. Results In the analysis, 36,284 cases were included. Bivariate analysis revealed that obesity was associated with an increased rate of minor complications (5.48% vs. 4.41%, p<0.0001) compared to non-obese individuals with similar major complications (3.33 vs. 3.21, p=0.49), mortality (0.54 vs. 0.64, p=0.22) and 30-day readmission rates (5.74 vs. 5.83, p=0.70). The GBT model demonstrated substantial predictive power across all four outcomes. In predicting mortality, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.80 in the validation set, with a misclassification rate of 0.68%. The prediction of major complications was also robust, with an AUROC of 0.91 in the validation set and a misclassification rate of 2.2%. Similarly, the model's performance in predicting minor complications and 30-day readmissions was strong, with AUROC values of 0.70 and 0.66, respectively, in the validation sets. Conclusions Obesity was linked to a higher rate of minor complications but did not affect other postoperative outcomes in RCC patients undergoing nephrectomy. By integrating a wide range of patient-specific variables, ML models are powerful tools for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and tailor perioperative care accordingly. The interaction between RCC and the surrounding adipose tissue microenvironment may have clinical relevance, warranting further research to elucidate the role of BMI in postoperative complications. Our findings advocate for the expanded use of ML techniques in surgical decision-making, which could enhance patient safety, optimize resource use, and improve overall surgical outcomes. Citation Format: Atulya A. Khosla, Manas Pustake, Sufal Chhabra, Yanjia Zhang, Mukesh Roy, Muni Rubens, Venkataraghavan Ramamoorthy, Anshul Saxena, Ishmael A. Jaiyesimi. Assessing the impact of obesity on postoperative outcomes in RCC using machine learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor-body Interactions: The Roles of Micro- and Macroenvironment in Cancer; 2024 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(22_Suppl):Abstract nr A026.

Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.

Hospital readmission after surgery is a key quality indicator. This nationwide cohort study aimed to assess readmission rates following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer and identify associated risk factors. Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients with esophagogastric cancer who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2011 and June 2016. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for 30-day readmission. In total, 5566 patients were included. Readmission within 30days occurred in 483 of 3488 (13.8%) patients after esophagectomy and 243 of 2078 patients (11.7%) after gastrectomy. Both minor (Clavien Dindo 1-2) and major (Clavien Dindo ≥3) postoperative complications were independent predictors of readmission after esophagectomy (OR 2.99; 95%CI 2.23-4.02; p< 0.001 and OR 5.20; 95%CI 3.82-7.09; p< 0.001). Specific complications included pulmonary (OR 1.49; 95%CI 1.20-1.85; p< 0.001), gastrointestinal (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.94-3.05; p< 0.001), and infectious (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.60-3.22; p< 0.001). Prolonged length of stay (pLOS) was associated with higher readmission rates in patients without complications following esophagectomy (OR 1.91 95% CI 1.19-3.07; p= 0.008), but lower rates in those with complications (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.51-0.83; p< 0.001). For gastrectomy, postoperative complications were also linked to readmission (OR 3.18; 95%CI 2.30-4.40; p< 0.001), particularly gastrointestinal (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.40-3.32; p< 0.001), and infectious (OR 3.80; 95%CI 2.53-5.71; p< 0.001). Readmission after esophagogastric resection is common, particularly among patients with both minor and major postoperative complications. Prolonged stay after esophagectomy impacts readmission risk differently based on the presence of complications.

Parotidectomy Trends Toward Outpatient for Benign Disease.

We evaluate the safety of outpatient parotidectomy. We evaluate factors that lead to planned admission and compare costs. We evaluate trends toward outpatient, and the outcomes of switching admission status, total versus superficial approach, and ambulatory versus hospital site. Retrospective cohort study. Single tertiary academic center. Retrospective review of patients who underwent parotidectomy for benign tumors from 2018 to 2023. Of 370 parotidectomies performed, there were a planned 162 admissions and 208 outpatient procedures. A travel time > 60 minutes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.487, confidence interval [CI]: 0.296-0.803, P = .005) and total parotidectomy (OR = 0.448, CI: 0.226-0.89, P = .022) decreased the odds of a planned outpatient procedure. In a multivariable model, longer operative time increased the odds of switching to inpatient (n = 29, OR = 1.02, CI: 1.007-1.033, P = .002) and drain placement decreased the odds of switching to outpatient (n = 15, OR =0.035, CI: 0.004-0.298, P = .002). There was no significant difference in surgical complications, phone calls, clinic visits, readmission rates, or recurrence between outpatient and inpatient. This remained true when comparing surgical facility and superficial versus total parotidectomy. After COVID was declared an emergency, there was a trend toward outpatient parotidectomy (72.7% vs 48.9%, P < .001), but no change in complication rates. At our institution, outpatient parotidectomy saved $3838 compared to overnight admission. This study supports that outpatient parotidectomy is safe. This remained true for patients switching admission status, undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy, and having their operation at an ambulatory site. We demonstrate that institutions can safely increase outpatient parotidectomy rates and outpatient parotidectomy is cost effective.

Synergistic use of Unplanned Reoperation and Hospital Readmission rates for quality monitoring in pediatric surgical care.

Unplanned reoperation (URO) and unplanned hospital readmission (UHR) are key quality indicators used to assess healthcare quality improvement. The aim of this study was to describe, quantify, analyze and compare both indicators in a Pediatric Surgery Department. An observational study was conducted reviewing the medical records of pediatric patients who underwent unplanned reoperation and unplanned hospital readmission over a six-year period in a pediatric surgical unit. The incidence, indications, and causes of reoperations and readmissions were analyzed. A total of 6,376 surgeries were performed over a six-year period. During this time, there were 37 (0.58%) URO and 20 (0.31%) UHR. There were 23/2,437(0.94%) URO and 14/2,437(0.57%) UHR among emergency surgeries. In contrast, there were 14/3,939(0.35%) URO and 6/3,939(0.15%) UHR among elective surgeries (p < 0.05). Outpatient surgeries had 3/1,639 (0.18%) URO and 1/1,639 (0.06%) UHR compared to inpatient surgeries that had 11/2,300(0.47%) URO and 5/2,300 (0.21%) UHR respectively (p = ns). A total of 1,570 appendectomies were performed during the study period, with 8/1,570(0.5%) patients requiring either a URO or a UHR. The most frequent indication for both URO and UHR were intra-abdominal infections. The main cause of URO was a technical error during surgery (70%), while the main cause of UHR was an error in the medical treatment (35%). In our practice, URO are more frequent than UHR. Emergency surgeries have a higher risk of undergoing an URO or a UHR. Acute appendicitis is the most common diagnosis associated with the need for an URO or a UHR. The majority of unplanned reoperation cases are due to technical errors during surgery.

Utilization of preoperative EOS imaging to prevent adverse events following total hip arthroplasty

ABSTRACT Introduction Previous studies have demonstrated the use of technology in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provided favorable outcomes. This study sought to describe the effect preoperative two-dimensional low-dose (2DLD) full-body radiographs had on the prevention of adverse outcomes following THA. Methods We reviewed 11,814 cases of patients who underwent primary, elective THA from 2016 to 2021. Patient demographics and clinical data were compared between patients who did or did not have preoperative standing and sitting 2DLD images (29.5% vs. 70.5%, respectively) using Chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regressions. Results The rate of patients with preexisting spinal fusion was higher in the 2DLD cohort (2.2 vs. 0.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). Preoperative 2DLD images were favored in outcomes including length of stay (40.15 vs. 67.16 hours; p < 0.001), rate of discharge to home (94.1 vs. 80.0%; p < 0.001), and 90-day readmission rate (3.5 vs. 6.0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated preoperative 2DLD images to be significantly associated with lower odds of dislocation, independent from surgical approach, coexisting spinal fusion, and utilization of dual-mobility implants. Conclusion Preoperative 2DLD images were independently associated with decreased risk for dislocations. Even in a higher risk cohort with spinal fusion, the rate of dislocation in the 2DLD cohort was significantly lower.

Undergoing cartilage procedures before total knee arthroplasty is not associated with worse postoperative functional outcomes, readmission rates or complication rates.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with prior knee cartilage surgery have unclear outcomes in the literature. This study compared outcomes after TKA in patients with or without prior knee cartilage surgery, and we hypothesized there would be equivocal outcomes between groups. A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted on patients from our institution who underwent ipsilateral cartilage procedure(s) and TKA (cases) or TKA alone (controls) from 2000 to 2022. Cartilage procedures included Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI), Osteochondral Allograft (OCA) and Microfracture (MFx). Matching was performed in 1:3 (case:control) ratio for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, pre-TKA Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade and follow-up for knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement (KOOS-JR). Mann-Whitney U and χ2 analyses were conducted, with significance being a p < 0.05. A priori power analysis required 29 patients per cohort to reach a clinically detectable difference of 11 for KOOS-JR. Forty-three cases (one ACI, eight OCA and 34 MFx) and 129 controls were included after matching, with no significant demographic differences. Cases underwent TKA after cartilage surgery at a mean of 4.6 years. No significant differences existed between cases and controls for the preoperative KOOS-JR (45.2 vs. 47.8; p = 0.353), postoperative KOOS-JR (69.8 vs. 69.9; p = 0.974) or Delta KOOS-JR (30.4 vs. 26.0; p = 0.387). No significant differences existed for 90-day readmission rates (4.7% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.600) or revision TKA rates (11.6% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.177). Patients with and without prior cartilage surgery experience similar functional outcomes, readmission rates and revision rates after TKA on the same knee. Patients who are candidates for TKA with a history of cartilage surgery may be counselled that their surgical history on that knee does not convey the risk of worse functional outcomes. Level III case-control study.

Effect of different durations of preoperative computerised cognitive training on postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a study protocol for a prospective, randomised controlled trial

IntroductionPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common neurological complication after surgery among older patients, characterised by acute disturbances in consciousness, attention and cognition, usually occurring within 24–72 hours after surgery. POD...

Risk Factors and Incidence of 30-Day Readmission following Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Reflecting advancements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is being performed increasingly as an outpatient procedure. This study aimed to report the frequency and timing of unplanned readmission after outpatient TKA with updated data, identify risk factors for readmission after outpatient TKA, and identify common causes for readmission after outpatient TKA with a much larger cohort compared to previous studies. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 31,347 patients who underwent outpatient TKA between 2012 and 2021. Adverse events and unplanned readmissions were identified. Timing and reason for readmission were recorded. Statistical analysis involved multivariate logistic regression to identify patient risk factors for readmission. Following surgery, 1.86% of cases reported an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (Odds ratio (OR): 1.042; P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.023; P = 0.002), operative time (OR: 1.003; P = 0.017), congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR: 3.079; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.577; P < 0.001), bleeding disorders (OR: 1.706; P = 0.025), hypertension (1.436; P < 0.001), and partially dependent functional status (OR: 2.486; P = 0.036) significantly increased the risk of 30-day readmission. Reasons unrelated to the surgical site contributed the most to readmission at 68.3%, while reasons related to the surgical site made up 27.3%, followed by knee-related complaints (4.40%). The most common days on which readmissions occurred were postoperative days two, four, and one. Our analysis revealed a low readmission risk (1.86%) after outpatient TKA. Readmission rates were found to decrease over the observed time, despite a dramatic increase in outpatient cases. The most common reason for 30-day readmission was an organ/space surgical site infection. Identified risk factors for readmission highlight areas for targeted mitigation to enhance patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Superiority of Frailty Over Age in Predicting Outcomes Among Clostridium Difficile Patients: Evidence from National Data.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a significant healthcare issue with increasing morbidity and mortality in the US and Europe. Frailty, characterized by reduced physical reserves and resistance to stressors, is linked to poor outcomes but its impact on CDI patients remains underexplored. This study seeks to address this gap through a nationwide analysis. Using the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2020, we employed the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modifications codes to identify adult patients admitted with CDI. We further stratified CDI hospitalizations based on frailty. Utilizing a regression model, we assessed the impact of frailty on CDI outcomes. We included 144,611 CDI patients of whom 98,167 (67.88%) were frail. Multivariate analysis showed that frail CDI patients had significantly higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.87), acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (aOR 9.50), septic shock (aOR 14.23), and intensive care unit admission (aOR 6.80). CDI-specific complications were more likely in frail patients, including toxic megacolon (aOR 10.22), intestinal perforation (aOR 2.30), need for colectomy (aOR 3.90) and CDI recurrence (aOR 3.65). Resource utilization, indicated by hospitalization charges, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, was greater among frail patients. Our study underscores the significant association between frailty and various critical endpoints of CDI, including its incidence, mortality, and recurrence. Additionally, frailty independently predicts higher resource utilization and elevated 30-day readmission. Recognizing frailty as a determinant of CDI outcomes can aid clinicians in risk stratification and guide tailored interventions for this population.

Impact of hospital readmissions following hospitalisation with delirium on 12-month mortality: a quaternary Australian hospital experience.

Inpatient delirium and unplanned hospital readmissions are associated with increased mortality. This study aimed to determine the effect of 28-day unplanned hospital readmissions on 12-month mortality post-discharge in patients with delirium during index hospitalisation. Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of adults aged 65 or above with delirium during hospitalisation at a Victorian quaternary hospital was performed. Delirium was identified by the inclusion of ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) codes in the hospital medical discharge summary. Descriptive statistics was obtained for baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards model was developed to identify independent predictors of 12-month post-discharge mortality. One thousand six hundred thirty-four patients with delirium during in-patient admission were included. The overall 12-month mortality rate was 35% (572 patients). Of the 1,425 patients who survived their index admission, 11.2% had an unplanned 28-day readmission. In Cox regression analysis, unplanned readmission (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.7-2.9), older age (HR 1.38, CI 1.11-1.72), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.21, CI 1.17-1.27), and discharge to nursing home (HR 1.58, CI 1.23-2.02) were independent predictors of 12-month mortality. Readmitted patients with 12-month mortality were older, with higher rates of dementia, polypharmacy, and nursing home residence compared to readmitted patients who did not reach this endpoint. Unplanned hospital readmission within 28days of discharge is an independent predictor of 12-month mortality post in-hospital delirium admission. Admissions complicated by delirium and readmission episodes should instigate discussions regarding prognostication and goals of care. Greater research is required to minimise hospital readmission rates following discharge in this cohort.

BN SO45 - Reported criteria and safety for day case management of acute appendicitis

Abstract Background Acute appendicitis has an incidence of 7-8%. About 45,000 appendicectomies are performed in UK/year. Whilst day case surgery (DCS) is standard for cholecystectomies, hernia repair and even gastric bypass, reluctance exists in application of day care pathway for acute appendicitis. We aimed to review published literature on patient selection criteria, rates of day case discharge, readmission and re-intervention rates and patient satisfaction. Method A literature search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed and Medline for day case appendicectomy, Patient safety, selection criteria. A total of 116 papers were found. Once duplicates were removed, 75 studies underwent abstract screening from which 41 were full text screened. 29 publications were included in this review study. Data was collected on criteria for patient selection, length of stay, rate of DCS, rates of re-admission and re-intervention and patient/ relative satisfaction. Results Studies assessed DCS in children and/or adults. All authors included patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, well managed pain without opioid analgesia and adequate social support. Other authors additionally, only included patients under 65yrs old. The rates of DCS varied between 36.9% - 87%. Factors affecting DCS were time of admission and operation, female patients, symptom control and social factors. Rates of readmission ranged between 0-2.5% with no difference between DCS and admitted patients. Rates of re-intervention were low (0-2.5%) with a high patient satisfaction (87-91%). Late evening finishing of operation led to patient admission (77%) with no complications occurring within 48hrs. Conclusion Day case surgery for appendicectomy is reported to be safe provided adequate patient education and clear criteria for patient selection. No significant difference was found between the rates of re-intervention and re-admission between day case and admitted patients. We suggest standardising care pathways and provision of adequate education to both patients and staff as a method of safe day care discharge.

HPB SO48 - Evaluating the timeframe for the provision of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients at a regional hospital

Abstract Background Acute biliary disease comprised a substantial proportion of the general emergency surgical workload. AUGIS and NICE guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) patients as it is associated with reduced readmission rates, healthcare costs and faster recovery without notable complication risks. According to the local trust policy, it advocates early LC to be performed within 72 hours of admission for AC patients. If this is not possible a delayed LC should be performed within 8 weeks of admission. Our aim is to examine variations in the provision of LC between current practice and local trust/ NICE guidelines. Method This is a retrospective audit looking at the total number of surgical patients diagnosed with AC between Jan and Dec 2023. The number of patients who had LC in 2023, unfit for surgery and did not consent for the procedure were also included. This data was obtained from electronic patient records (investigative reports, discharge letters, outpatient letters) and then collated on a Microsoft Excel sheet for analysis. Surgical patients who were not diagnosed with AC such as those with biliary pancreatitis, cholelithiasis or cholangitis but subsequently underwent LC were excluded. Results The number of AC patients who were fit and consented to surgical intervention in 2023 was 88. The total number of delayed procedures done was 75 (85.2%). The number of patients who had early LC within 1 week was 13 (14.8%). Of the 75 patients who had delayed LC, 19 (25.3%) patients had delayed LC within 8 weeks from the diagnosis date. The remaining 56 (74.7%) patients had delayed LC after 8 weeks. For patients who had delayed LC, the readmission rate within 6 months of their discharge while waiting for their operative dates was 29 (38.7%). Conclusion One-third of AC patients were readmitted while waiting for LC, some had complications of gallstone disease such as perforation/ gallstone ileus. Therefore, the early provision of LC is crucial in minimising the readmission and complication rates. This data was highlighted in a departmental meeting and teaching session for consultants and junior doctors. We plan to liaise with stakeholders and theatre managers in implementing further solutions to improve compliance where possible. One critical area is auditing the condition of surgical patients in order to be put on the hospital’s twice-weekly hot gallbladder list to consider prioritising AC patient surgical time.

BN SO07 - Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with severe acute calculous cholecystitis. What next? An analysis of 102 cases

Abstract Background Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) can be a life-saving treatment for patients presenting with fulminant acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC). In the case of those who make a good recovery and are fit for surgery, PC is often advocated. However, in those who are higher risk for surgery, there is currently no strong consensus regarding further management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of PC and interval LC versus PC alone in patients with ACC. Method We conducted a single-centre retrospective case-control evaluation of the outcomes of patients who have undergone a PC due to severe ACC, comparing those who have gone on to have an interval LC versus those who had PC only. The primary outcomes were the rate of readmissions with recurrent biliary disease and late mortality. Results While the rate of readmissions did not differ between groups (p= 0.583), in the surgical cohort most recurrent gallstone events occurred before LC. ASA score &amp;gt;2 and Tokyo grade 3 were significant positive predictors of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.6 to 12.6, OR 4.5, p=0.004, and 95% CI 1.2 to 12.2, OR 3.8, p=0.027, respectively). Surgery was found to be a negative predictor of mortality (95% CI 0.04 to 0.5, OR 0.2, p=0.003). Conclusion Those who do not go on to have their gallbladder removed after PC, face significantly worse outcomes. Every effort should be made to optimise these patients to facilitate operative management.

EGS SO31 - Does in-hospital delay in appendicectomy lead to complicated appendicitis and affect post operative outcome - a single centre study

Abstract Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common reasons for emergency general surgical admissions in the U.K. The standard treatment for acute appendicitis is emergency appendicectomy. However, the urgency to operate on patients admitted to hospital with acute appendicitis has been widely debated, with no current standard guideline to follow. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of in-hospital delay in appendicectomy on intra operative findings of complicated appendicitis. The secondary outcome measures were the requirement of a surgical drain, overall length of stay, post-operative complications and re-admission rates. Method This was a single centre retrospective study. All patients who underwent an emergency appendicectomy, between 01/09/2023 and 30/11/2023 were included in this study. Hospital electronic patient records were screened to record the time of decision to operate, surgical start time, the delay between decision to operate and surgical start, intra-operative findings, and post-operative course. A total of 105 patients were included. These were divided into two sub-groups based on the delay between decision to operate and surgical start time; patients who had surgery within 12-hours (early) and those who had surgery after 12-hours (delayed) from the decision to operate time. Results Surgery was performed within 12-hours in 42% cases. The remaining 68% had more than a 12-hour delay, with almost 1 in 4 cases (26 /105) delayed over 24 hours. 15% cases (16) with uncomplicated appearance on pre-op imaging and delayed more than 12-hours progressed to complicated appendicitis intra-operatively. Surgical drains were required in 10% delayed cases and 6% early cases. The median length of stay was 2-days in delayed, compared to 1 day in cases performed early. Post-operative complications were higher in cases early. Although majority of these had complicated appearance in pre-op imaging. Both groups had same readmission rate. Conclusion Our study found that in-hospital delay in appendicectomy can potentially result in increased length of stay, higher rate of requirement of surgical drains and progression from imaging severity. This needs better prioritisation and theatre allocation.

HPB SO35 - Outcomes of Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration at the time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in patients with small common bile duct diameter

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LC+LCBDE) is a single stage therapeutic option for management of choledocholithiasis. There have been limited publications regarding the feasibility of transcystic LCBDE in patients with small (≤8mm) common bile ducts (CBD). This study seeks to examine the outcomes for patients with small ducts who underwent LC+LCBDE via a transcystic approach (LCBDE-t) in a district general hospital over a thirty-month period. Method Prospectively collected data regarding all patients who underwent LC+LCBDE-t over a period from January 2022 to June 2024 was retrospectively reviewed. Data including indication for surgery, CBD diameter, length of stay, complication rate, and readmission rate were determined from Electronic Care Records. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results 76 patients were identified. CBD diameter (almost all as measured at pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]) ranged from 3.5mm to 8mm (average 6.32). One patient required conversion to open surgery due to difficulties with the LC element of the operation. Median postoperative length of stay was 1 day (range 0-32 days) and readmission rate was 5.33%. Five patients experienced a complication beyond Clavien-Dindo Grade II, with the most serious two being a bile leak and a postoperative bleed, both of which required further surgery. One patient required subsequent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for retained CBD stones. Conclusion LCBDE is a safe and effective management option for patients in the setting of choledocholithiasis with small CBD diameter. Small CBD should not necessarily be a deterrent to consideration of transcystic LCBDE as a therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients.

EGS SO25 - Ingestion of Sharp Foreign Bodies- Emerging Trends in a Large UK NHS Trust

Abstract Background Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common medical problem. The type of object ingested depends on age, sex, socio-economic factors, geographical area, and nutritional habits. Accidental ingestion of hijab pins as a phenomenon has not been widely reported in the UK previously. Method Retrospective cohort study on all patients presenting with foreign body ingestion from July 2010 to January 2024. Patient medical records were reviewed, and data collected including mode of presentation, demographics, FB type and mode of ingestion (accidental/deliberate), admission details, radiology, management (conservative, endoscopic, surgery), morbidity and mortality and readmission rate. Data was recorded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results 94 patients presented with FB ingestion of whom 39 ingested hijab pins. Median age was 19 (11-50) years. Median time from ingestion to presentation was 5 hours (0.5-120). All patients had abdominal Xray. The most common hijab pin location on presentation was in the stomach; n=27 (69%). Data on management was available in 38 patients, of whom 29 (76%) were managed conservatively, 6 (15%) had endoscopy and 3 (8%) had flexible nasal endoscopy (FNE). The reintervention rate was 3% with one patient managed conservatively subsequently having endoscopy. No complications, readmissions or mortality was observed. One OGD was therapeutic Conclusion We report increase in the incidence of FB ingestion with a significant proportion involving hijab pins. Young girls hold pins between their lips while styling their hijabs which can result in accidental ingestion. Although we report low morbidity and readmission rates, there is a 22% intervention rate. We believe there may be a causal link between increased accidental ingestion and popularity of social media content on elaborate hijab styling, some with millions of views each. There is a need to increase awareness on dangers of holding pins in the mouth whilst styling hijabs and alternate options such as hijab magnets

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation

BACKGROUND Gallbladder perforation occurs in 2% to 11% of patients with acute cholecystitis, with associated mortality estimated to be at 12% to 42%. Because of its low incidence, the data on management remain sparse. There is a lack of evidence to suggest whether early or delayed cholecystectomy is superior in the treatment of perforated cholecystitis. We hypothesize that an early definitive operation is associated with decreased total hospital length of stay (THLOS). METHODS Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from the American College of Surgery, we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation on an urgent or emergent basis from 2012 to 2021. We divided them into those who underwent early (&lt;2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation) and delayed cholecystectomy (≥2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation). Our primary outcome was the THLOS. We created multivariate regression models to assess for the association of early versus delayed operation and THLOS. RESULTS The THLOS was found to be 2.94 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group (p &lt; 0.05). In those who did not present with sepsis on admission, the THLOS was noted to be 4.71 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group (p &lt; 0.05). Early versus delayed operation was not associated with a difference in the postoperative length of stay, 30-day postoperative complications, rate of readmission, and reoperation, regardless of preoperative sepsis status. CONCLUSION Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation is associated with decreased THLOS, and there were no other differences in outcomes compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with gallbladder perforation would likely benefit from an early operation within 2 days of admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care management; Level III.

HPB SO20 - Evaluating the Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Post Hepatectomy in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Defined criteria for the resectability of liver disease continue to be refined. In the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), data regarding its safety and efficacy in specific patient populations is required. Patients with liver cirrhosis are particularly vulnerable, owing to both operative and peri-operative risk. However, the application of ERAS in cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy is absent from the most recent ERAS Society Group recommendations from 2022. We present a meta-analysis assessing outcomes after liver resection in patients with cirrhosis following an ERAS protocol compared to standard post-operative care. Method A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies were included if comparing ERAS protocols versus standard post-operative care in patients undergoing liver resection in which more than 50% of the patient population had cirrhosis at time of surgery. The primary outcome analysed was overall complication rates with secondary outcomes of post-operative mortality, estimated blood loss, operation time, post-operative incidence of liver failure, readmission and reoperation rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results 930 records were screened for eligibility. Five articles were eligible for inclusion(ERAS n = 425 vs control group n = 423 patients). Cirrhotic patients enrolled in an ERAS program post-hepatectomy had a significantly reduced risk of overall complications (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.33, 0.61, p&amp;lt;0.00001) and a shorter hospital stay when compared to standard post-operative care by 1.8 days (mean difference -1.83, 95% CI -2.22, -1.45, p&amp;lt;0.00001). No significant differences were noted in post-operative mortality, estimated blood loss, operation time, post-operative incidence of liver failure, readmission or reoperation rates between the ERAS group and control. Conclusion Application of an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing liver resection is safe and feasible in cirrhotic patients. ERAS protocols were successful in significantly reducing overall complication rates and length of inpatient hospital stay, and did not negatively impact secondary post-operative outcomes or mortality. ERAS protocols should be reflected in future guidelines, specifically for cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy, and additional research on the utility of ERAS in higher risk patients is encouraged.

HPB SO56 - Prompt prescription of fluids and analgesia for acute pancreatitis and evaluation of subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Quality Improvement Project

Abstract Background Pancreatitis is a common presentation for General Surgery department nationally. Treatment of these patients are timely initiation of analgesia and fluid resuscitation. Patients with gallstone pancreatitis should have inpatient cholecystectomy as per the NICE Guidance. Delays in treatment of acute pancreatitis can worsen mortality and morbidity rates. We aim to assess if patients have been given fluid, analgesia, VTE prophylaxis promptly upon admission and if they had laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the index admission for those with gallstone pancreatitis. Method Single centre retrospective cohort of patients, above 18 years old, who presented to general surgery services from November 2022-23. Patients need to have radiological evidence of pancreatitis or raised amylase above 150. Patients were evaluated for prompt prescription of analgesia, fluids and VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours based on our ePrescription system. Evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy service was also performed to assess if patients had the surgery during the indexed admission or within 30 days of discharge. Results 99 patients with median age of 60 was included. Only 3 patients required higher levels of care in HDU or ITU. The median length of stay was 5 days. 96% had analgesia prescribed, 91% had VTE prescribed but only 81% had fluids. Of those who did not have fluids within 24 hours, the average lenght of stay was 5.5 days and only 1 patient needed to be admitted to intensive care unit. 26 patients had gallstone pancreatitis but 15% had laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed. Our readmission rate was 6% and 30-day mortality was 1%. Conclusion Delays in the prescription of fluids and analgesia are still present, with a proportion of patients not getting the appropriate treatment for acute pancreatitis. We will use a tailored prescription set for acute pancreatitis to ensure prompt prescriptions are done for patients. This will be re-evaluated to assess its effectiveness. Further evaluation is required to look at reasons for patients not getting cholecystectomy promptly after admission for acute pancreatitis.