In this study, the objective was to assess the extent to which EFs and visual processing, especially visual attention, contribute to children’s performance in the Colored Progressive Matrices of Raven (CPM), a test generally used between 5 - 11 years. For this purpose, we tested children from first grade to fourth grade in a battery that included the different sub-domains of EFs and visual processing tests. We hypothesized that links will be found between the performance in CPM, executive functions performance and visual/attentional processes. In addition, we hypothesized that EFs, in particular, working memory (WM) and shifting/updating, will explain variance in the performance in the CPM. At the same time, on the basis of findings showing a link between reading skills and performance in the RAVEN, we collected reading accuracy and fluency measures to assess the extent to which EFs and visual processing explain variance in the performance of RAVEN beyond reading accuracy. At the behavioral level, we found a grade effect in almost all the measures collected. Also, we found significant but still weak correlations between the performance in the CPM and almost all EFs, VP and reading measures (accuracy and fluency). The highest and most significant correlations were found between the CPM and Color Trail test (part B), which measures mental flexibility and shifting (r = .35) with reading accuracy (r = .38). Regression models conducted separately to assess the contribution of VP, EFs and reading showed first that VP explained 16% of the variance in the CPM, but only the Color Trail (Part A) was a significant predictor of the Raven’s scores. EFs explained 18% of the variance in the performance in the CPM, with Color Trail (Part B) measuring shifting being the strongest and significant predictor and then the Digit Span. Finally, a step-wise regression model showed that reading accuracy alone explained 15% of the variance in CPM, and with EFs and VP, additional 6% were provided (total 21%) by the Color Trail B. In spite of its limitations (the size of the sample groups), this study points to several new and important areas of inquiry for future research. For one, we noticed that not only does general ability correlate with reading, but reading, as a complex skill that includes many sub-skills, correlates with performance in non-verbal tests such as the CPM. In this regard, one can ask whether or not the school system should consider taking general ability and high-order thinking skills such as strategies and making connections into account as part of the pre-reading curriculum at early ages?
Read full abstract