Geometric Mean Ratios Research Articles

The effect of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine on vaccine-specific responses among schoolchildren in rural Uganda (POPVAC B): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

Several important vaccines differ in immunogenicity and efficacy between populations. We hypothesised that malaria suppresses responses to unrelated vaccines and that this effect can be reversed-at least partially-by monthly malaria intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) in high-transmission settings. We conducted an individually randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of malaria IPT with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on vaccine responses among schoolchildren aged 9-17 years in Jinja district, Uganda. Participants were recruited from two schools and did not have exposure to vaccines of interest after the age of 5 years, with the exception of human papillomavirus (HPV). Computer-generated 1:1 randomisation was implemented in REDCap. 3-day courses of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (dosage by weight) or placebo were administered monthly, including twice before the first vaccination. Trial participants were vaccinated with the live parenteral BCG vaccine (Serum Institute of India, Pune, India) at week 0; yellow fever vaccine (YF-17D; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France); live oral typhoid vaccine (Ty21a; PaxVax, London, UK), and quadrivalent virus-like particle HPV vaccine (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) at week 4; and toxoid vaccines (tetanus-diphtheria; Serum Institute of India) and an HPV booster at week 28. An additional HPV vaccination at week 8 was provided to female participants older than 14 years who had not previously been vaccinated, and a tetanus-diphtheria booster was given after completion of the trial at week 52. Primary outcomes were vaccine responses at week 8 and, for tetanus-diphtheria, at week 52, and analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Malaria parasite prevalence at enrolment and during follow-up was determined retrospectively by PCR. The safety population comprised all randomly allocated participants. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN62041885) and is complete. Between May 25 and July 14, 2021, we assessed 388 potential participants for eligibility. We enrolled and randomly allocated 341 participants to the two groups (170 [50%] to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and 171 [50%] to placebo); 192 (56%) were female and 149 (44%) participants were male. 145 (85%) participants in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group and 140 participants (82%) in the placebo group were followed up until the week 52 endpoint. At enrolment, 109 (64%) of all participants in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group and 99 (58%) of 170 participants in the placebo group had malaria; this reduced to 6% or lower at all follow-up visits in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group. There was no effect of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus placebo on primary outcomes: BCG-specific IFNγ ELISpot response had a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 1·09 (95% CI 0·93-1·29), p=0·28; yellow fever neutralising antibody was 1·19 (0·91-1·54), p=0·20 for plaque reduction neutralising reference tests (PRNT50) titres (the reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 50%) and 1·24 (0·97-1·58), p=0·09 for PRNT90 titres (reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 90%); and IgG to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi O-lipopolysaccharide was 1·09 (0·81-1·46), p=0·58, HPV-16 was 0·72 (0·44-1·77), p=0·19, HPV-18 was 0·71 (0·47-1·09), p=0·11; tetanus toxoid was 1·22 (0·91-1·62), p=0·18, and diphtheria toxoid was 0·97 (0·83-1·13), p=0·72. There was some evidence that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine reduced waning of the yellow fever response. IPT for malaria with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine did not improve peak vaccine responses, despite reducing malaria prevalence. Possible longer-term effects on response waning should be further explored. UK Medical Research Council. For the Luganda translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The effect of intensive praziquantel administration on vaccine-specific responses among schoolchildren in Ugandan schistosomiasis-endemic islands (POPVAC A): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Vaccine responses differ between populations and are often impaired in rural and low-income settings. The reasons for this are not fully understood, but observational data suggest that the immunomodulating effects of parasitic helminths might contribute. We hypothesised that Schistosoma mansoni infection suppresses responses to unrelated vaccines, and that suppression could be reversed-at least in part-by intensive praziquantel administration. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial of intensive versus standard intervention against S mansoni among schoolchildren aged 9-17 years from eight primary schools in Koome islands, Uganda. Children were randomly allocated to either an intensive group or a standard group with a computer-generated 1:1 randomisation using permuted blocks sizes 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants in the intensive group received three praziquantel doses (approximately 40 mg/kg) 2 weeks apart before first vaccination at week 0, and every 3 months thereafter. Participants in the standard group were given one dose of approximately 40 mg/kg praziquantel after the week 8 primary endpoint. Participants in both groups received the BCG vaccine (Serum Institute of India, Pune, India) at week 0; the yellow fever (Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France), oral typhoid (PaxVax, London, UK), and first human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) at week 4; and the HPV booster and tetanus-diphtheria vaccine (Serum Institute of India) at week 28. The primary outcome was vaccine response at week 8 (except for tetanus and diphtheria, which was assessed at week 52). The primary analysis population was participants who were infected with S mansoni at baseline, determined retrospectively using either plasma circulating anodic antigen (CAA) or stool PCR. The safety population comprised all randomly allocated participants. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN60517191) and is complete. Between July 9 and Aug 14, 2019, we enrolled 478 participants, with 239 children per group. 276 (58%) participants were male and 202 (42%) participants were female. Among participants who were positive for S mansoni at baseline (171 [72%] in the intensive group and 164 [69%] in the standard group) intensive praziquantel administration significantly reduced pre-vaccination infection intensity (to median 30 CAA pg/mL [IQR 7-223] vs 1317 [243-8562], p<0·001) compared with standard treatment. Intensive praziquantel administration also reduced week 8 HPV-16-specific IgG response (geometric mean ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54-0·94], p=0·017), but had no effect on other primary outcomes. Among all participants (regardless of S mansoni status at baseline) intensive praziquantel administration significantly improved week 8 BCG-specific IFNγ ELISpot response (1·20 [1·01-1·43], p=0·038). Recognised adverse effects of praziquantel were reported more frequently in the intensive group. There were no recorded serious adverse events in either group. We show evidence suggesting that praziquantel administration improves the BCG-specific cellular response, but not humoral responses to other vaccines. Despite observational evidence that helminths impair vaccine response, these results show minimal immediate benefits of reducing helminth burden. The effect of longer-term helminth control should be investigated. UK Medical Research Council. For the Luganda translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The effect of BCG revaccination on the response to unrelated vaccines in urban Ugandan adolescents (POPVAC C): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Immune responses induced by several important vaccines differ between populations, with reduced responses in low-income and rural settings compared with high-income and urban settings. BCG immunisation boosts immune responses to some unrelated vaccines in high-income populations. We aimed to test the hypothesis that BCG revaccination can enhance responses to unrelated vaccines in Ugandan schoolchildren. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial to compare the effects of BCG revaccination versus no BCG revaccination on the immunogenicity of subsequent unrelated vaccines among adolescents aged 13-17 years who are participants in an urban Ugandan birth cohort study, in which BCG vaccination was documented at birth. Participants were excluded if they had received any of the trial vaccines or related agents when aged 5 years or older. Computer-generated 1:1 randomisation was implemented in REDCap. Participants were excluded if they were concurrently enrolled in other trials; had a clinically significant history of immunodeficiency, or serious psychiatric conditions or moderate to severe acute illnesses; were taking immunosuppressive medications; had allergies to vaccine components, a predisposition towards developing keloid scarring; positive HIV tests or pregnancy tests; were female participants who were lactating; or if they planned to use investigational drugs, vaccines, blood products, or any combination thereof. Trial participants assigned to the BCG revaccination group received the live parenteral BCG-Russia vaccine (Serum Institute of India, Pune, India; 0·1 mL intradermally, right upper arm) at week 0. All participants received yellow fever vaccine (YF-17D; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm), live oral typhoid vaccine (Ty21a; PaxVax, London, UK; one capsule per day taken for three alternate days), and quadrivalent virus-like particle human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) at week 4; and toxoid vaccines (tetanus-diphtheria; Serum Institute of India; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) and an HPV booster at week 28. An additional HPV vaccination at week 8 was provided to female participants older than 14 years who had not previously been vaccinated. The primary outcomes were yellow fever neutralising antibody titres at 4 weeks post-YF-17D vaccination, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (henceforth S Typhi) O-lipopolysaccharide (O:LPS)-specific IgG concentration at 4 weeks post-Ty21a vaccination, and HPV-16 and HPV-18 L1 protein-specific IgG concentration at 4 weeks post-HPV vaccination. Primary outcome assays were conducted at week 8, and at week 52 for tetanus-diphtheria. We conducted an intention-to-treat analysis comparing log-transformed outcomes between trial groups, with results back-transformed to geometric mean ratios (GMRs). The safety population comprised all randomly allocated participants. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN10482904) and is complete. Between Aug 31 and Oct 12, 2020, we screened 376 potential participants for eligibility. We enrolled and randomly allocated 300 participants to the two groups (151 [50%] to the BCG group and 149 [50%] to the no BCG group). 178 (59%) of 300 participants were male and 122 (41%) were female. 142 (91%) of 151 participants in the BCG group and 139 (93%) of 149 in the no BCG group completed follow-up. There was no effect of BCG revaccination, compared with no BCG revaccination, on the response observed for any vaccine. Yellow fever plaque reduction neutralising reference tests (PRNT50) titres (the reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 50%) had a GMR of 0·95 (95% CI 0·75-1·19; p=0·62) and PRNT90 (reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 90%) had a GMR of 0·94 (0·74-1·19; p=0·60); IgG to S Typhi O:LPS was 0·99 (0·80-1·23; p=0·94); IgG to HPV-16 was 0·97 (0·69-1·35; p=0·85) and to HPV-18 was 1·03 (0·76-1·40; p=0·83); and toxoid-specific IgG for tetanus was 1·13 (0·87-1·47; p=0·36) and was 1·00 (0·87-1·16; p=0·97) for diphtheria. There were no serious adverse events in either group. We found no evidence that BCG revaccination is an effective strategy to improve immunogenicity of other vaccines in this low-income, urban setting. UK Medical Research Council. For the Luganda translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Bioequivalence Analysis of Ondansetron Hydrochloride Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Phase I Study.

Ondansetron is a highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that alleviates nausea and vomiting. Bioequivalence evaluation ensures that the efficacy of generic drugs is consistent with that of the original drug. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of ondansetron hydrochloride (HCl) tablets taken in single doses under fasting and postprandial conditions in healthy subjects. In this randomized, open-label, two-cycle, crossover phase I study, liquid chromatography‒tandem mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS) was used to determine the ondansetron concentration in dipotassium-ethylenediaminetetraacetate (K2-EDTA) plasma after the subjects received a single 8 mg of ondansetron and reference formulation. Twenty-six healthy subjects received one tablet of ondansetron under fasting conditions and 28 subjects received one under postprandial conditions. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence interval (CI) was 80.00-125.00%. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via WinNonLin 8.1 software and the bioequivalence data were evaluated via Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 statistics software. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the maximum observed concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration‒time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC0-t), and the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) from the test/reference formulation under fasting conditions were 90.50, 90.43, and 90.25, respectively. The 90% CIs were 83.75-97.79, 82.64-98.95, and 82.25-99.03, respectively. The GMRs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ after a high-fat meal were 96.85, 93.57, and 93.77, respectively; the 90% CIs were 88.43-106.07, 87.35-100.24, and 87.35-100.68, respectively. The test and reference formulations of ondansetron HCl have bioequivalence for healthy adult subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions.

Sex-specific association of NT-proBNP with clinically inapparent structural heart disease in the general population: results from the STAAB study

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend echocardiography in subjects beyond defined levels of natriuretic peptides. The ACC/AHA guidelines on heart failure (HF) state echocardiographic signs of structural heart disease (SHD) that define the precursor stage B of heart failure. Purpose To study the age- and sex-specific association between echocardiographically assessed structural heart disease (echoSHD) and NT-proBNP levels in the general population. Methods The STAAB study investigates precursor stages of HF in the general population of a medium-sized city in Germany (source population 124,297 inhabitants as of 2011 census). Study participants were recruited between 12/2013 and 10/2017 from the source population without preceding HF diagnosis, stratified for sex and age (30-79 years). For this analysis, we excluded participants with previously diagnosed coronary artery disease. EchoSHD was accepted if one of the following criteria, diagnosed according to current echo guidelines, was detectable at echocardiography: left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV dilation, reduced LV ejection fraction, moderate-to-severe LV valve disease, and LV diastolic dysfunction. Results Of 4,649 subjects analysed (93.6% of STAAB participants, age 30-79 years, 53.5% women), 863 (18.6%) had echoSHD. NT-proBNP depended strongly on age and sex (figure). Frequencies of echoSHD varied between women (23.0%) and men (13.5%; P&amp;lt;0.001). EchoSHD was associated with increased NT-proBNP levels in both women (geometric mean ratio 1.18, 95%CI 1.09–1.27, P&amp;lt;0.001; figure) and men (ratio 1.62, 1.46–1.79, P&amp;lt;0.001); P&amp;lt;0.001 for different ratios in both sexes. Of note, age did not influence these ratios as well as their difference (P=0.34 and P=0.95, resp.). Conclusion Clinically inapparent echoSHD was associated with higher levels of NT-proBNP, of a magnitude that was relevant in men. The sex difference in the strength of this relationship might be due to different pathophysiological processes leading to SHD and ultimately HF in women and men. It might also indicate the need for adopted definitions of echoSHD in women. Our results further point towards the need of age- and sex-specific NT-proBNP thresholds.NTproBNP according to sex, age, and SHD

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of 2 Oral Formulations of Vildagliptin in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

A randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 2 oral formulations of vildagliptin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 56 healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single 50-mg dose of either a generic vildagliptin tablet (T) or the reference formulation (R). The washout period was 3 days. Blood samples were collected up to 24hours postdosing during each period and analyzed for vildagliptin using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum serum concentration, area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were all within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. This indicates that the generic and reference formulations are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed states. All adverse events reported were mild and transient. High-fat meals delayed absorption and reduced the maximum peak concentration of both formulations; however, they did not affect the overall exposure. Therefore, vildagliptin can be taken without regard to meals.

Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Regorafenib Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-formulation, and 2-cycle crossover trial conducted in 48 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (regorafenib) and reference formulation (40mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 144hours after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios of maximum blood concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for regorafenib were as follows: 94.7%, 91.4%, and 91.7%, respectively, under fasting conditions; and 94.6%, 97.7%, and 98.8%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios were within the 80%-125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods increases exposure to regorafenib, leading to slower rates of absorption. The safety profiles of the 2 preparations were similar.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Powders of Azithromycin for Suspension: A Nonblinded, Single-Dose, Randomized, Three-Way Crossover Study in Fed and Fasting States Among Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Azithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, is commonly used to treat mild-to-moderate bacterial infections. This research aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) properties and bioequivalence (BE) of two azithromycin (EQ 100 mg base/packet) powders for suspension in Chinese healthy participants in fed and fasting conditions. A total of 90 Chinese healthy participants were enrolled in this nonblinded, single-dose, randomized, semireplicate, three-period, three-sequence, crossover study. Of them, 42 and 40 were categorized to the fed and fasting conditions, respectively. The washout period between doses was 21 days. Blood specimens were harvested prior to administering the drug and 194 h following administration. The plasma levels of azithromycin were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) approach. PK parameters were measured using noncompartmental analysis. This research compared BE between the reference and test products using the average bioequivalence (ABE) or reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) method, considering the within-subject variability (SWR) of the reference preparation. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored to examine safety and tolerability. The RSABE method (SWR ≥ 0.294) was used to determine the BE of maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) in both fed and fasting conditions. In the ABE approach, (SWR < 0.294) was adopted to assess the BE of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) and determine the area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC0-inf). In the fasting condition, the point estimate of the test/reference ratio for Cmax was 1.08, with a 95% upper confidence bound of - 0.05 < 0.00. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for AUC0-t and AUC0-inf was 115.21% [90% confidence interval (CI) 107.25-123.27%] and 113.07% (90% CI 105.14-121.61%), respectively. In the fed condition, the point estimate of the test/reference ratio for Cmax was 0.94, with a 95% upper confidence bound of - 0.10 < 0.00. The GMR for AUC0-t and AUC0-inf was 99.51% (90% CI of 91.03-108.78%) and 99.43% (90% CI 91.73-107.78%), respectively. These data all satisfied the BE criteria for drugs with high variability. All AEs were transient and mild, and no severe AEs were observed. Our study indicated that the test and reference products of azithromycin (EQ 100 mg base/packet) powder for suspension were bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese participants, irrespective of the feeding condition. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION (CHINADRUGTRIALS.ORG.CN): CTR20232646, registered on 25 August 2023.

Study on bioequivalence and influence of obesity-related indicators on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for insulin degludec in healthy subjects

This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between test and reference insulin degludec (IDeg) and the effects of body composition on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IDeg in Chinese healthy volunteers. In this randomized, open-label, crossover trial, 30 healthy Chinese males were assigned to receive a single subcutaneous dose (0.4 IU/kg) of each formulation under 24-h euglycemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp. Body compositions were analysed prior to administration and blood samples were collected at specific times. The 90% of primary pharmacokinetic parameters and 95% of primary pharmacodynamic parameters confidence intervals for the ratio of the least-squares geometric means were all in the range of 80–125%. As the fat content level increases, Cmax, AUC0−12 and GIR-AUC0−24 decreased whereas AUC24−96 increased sequentially. Therefore, the equivalence was demonstrated between test and reference, and in healthy Chinese volunteers, higher levels of adiposity are associated with slower rates of insulin absorption and distribution and the poorer glucose-lowering effect.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of clomipramine, yohimbine and clomipramine/yohimbine combination: A clinical drug-drug interaction study.

Clomipramine (CLOMI) has shown effectiveness in treating premature ejaculation but is linked to erectile dysfunction and reduced libido. Yohimbine (YOH), by contrast, is effective in treating erectile dysfunction and may improve libido. Combining CLOMI and YOH could potentially leverage the benefits of both drugs. This study aimed to investigate the interactions between these drugs and to evaluate their safety profile. A prospective, open-labelled, single-centre, pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction study was performed in 15 healthy male subjects. Single-dose and steady-state PK were investigated using noncompartmental analysis after mono- and combination therapy of the 2 orally applied drugs. Plasma sampling was performed at baseline, 0.5 (YOH), 1, 1.5 (YOH), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h (CLOMI). Differences in the area under the curve after multiple dosing (MD) were determined using an equivalence boundary of 80-125%. The geometric mean ratio of the area under the curve up to 12 h for MD CLOMI (combination vs. monotherapy) was 112% (90% confidence interval: 104-120%), whereas for MD YOH this ratio was 137% (90% confidence interval: 112-168%). The study drugs were safe and well tolerated as mono- and combination therapy, with no major adverse events reported. A PK assessment of clomipramine and yohimbine indicated a clinically significant drug-drug interaction for MD YOH in combination with CLOMI. This might be explained by competitive, CLOMI-related inhibition of YOH metabolism, probably mediated by cytochrome P450 2D6. However, according to European Medicines Agency guidelines, the effect can be classified as interaction absent (<1,25 fold) or minor (>1.25-<2-fold). Given the complimentary mechanisms of action and the favourable safety profiles, the findings pave the way for future efficacy studies.

A Bioequivalence Study of Azilsartan in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Azilsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker used for treating adult hypertension. It significantly improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high-risk hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, dual-cycle, dual-crossover clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of azilsartan under fasting and postprandial conditions in 60 Chinese healthy volunteers. Thirty healthy subjects were enrolled in each test group, with random cross-administration for fasting and postprandial tests. The concentration of azilsartan in human plasma was evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after a single oral administration of test and reference preparations, each at a dose of 20mg (1 tablet). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonlin8.2 software, and bioequivalence was evaluated using SAS 9.4 software. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity of the test and reference preparations in the fasting and postprandial test groups were in the range of 80%-125%. The incidence of adverse events in the fasting and postprandial test groups was 30% (9/30) and 33.3% (10/30), respectively. No serious adverse events or unexpected adverse drug reactions were observed. In conclusion, the test and reference preparations of azilsartan tablets demonstrate bioequivalence and good safety in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Intravenous Candidate Biosimilar CT-P47 and Reference Tocilizumab: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 1 Study.

CT-P47 is a candidate biosimilar of tocilizumab. This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, phase 1 study aimed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence of CT-P47 and reference tocilizumab. Participants were healthy Japanese adults aged 18-55 years. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single intravenous dose (8 mg/kg) of CT-P47, EU-approved tocilizumab (EU-tocilizumab), or US-licensed tocilizumab (US-tocilizumab). Primary PK endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum serum concentration. Additional PK variables, safety, and immunogenicity were evaluated. The study was conducted from January 20 to May 26, 2023, in three centers in Japan. In total, 133 male participants were randomized (n = 45 to CT-P47, n = 44 to EU-tocilizumab, and n = 44 to US-tocilizumab). For all primary PK variables, 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of geometric least squares means were within the predefined equivalence margin of 0.80-1.25. Secondary PK variables were similar across groups. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was neutrophil count decreased, occurring in 15 (33.3%), 13 (30.2%), and 12 (27.3%) participants in the CT-P47, EU-tocilizumab, and US-tocilizumab groups, respectively. There were no serious TEAEs, deaths, or study drug discontinuations due to TEAEs. Few participants were anti-drug antibody (ADA)- or neutralizing antibody (NAb)-positive. At the end of study, four (8.9%), one (2.3%), and two (4.5%) participants in the CT-P47, EU-tocilizumab, and US-tocilizumab groups, respectively, were ADA-positive; two (4.4%), zero (0%), and one (2.3%) in the respective groups were NAb-positive. CT-P47 demonstrated PK equivalence and comparable safety to EU- and US-tocilizumab.

A single-dose, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study of levamlodipine besilate tablets in healthy subjects.

Levamlodipine, the levorotatory form of amlodipine racemate, has a blood pressure-lowering effect that is twice that of the racemate. The study aims to establish a foundation for the clinical application of the test drug by conducting a phase I clinical bioequivalence trial, comparing its bioequivalence and safety with the reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects. Recruiting 26 healthy subjects for separate bioequivalence trials in both fasting and fed conditions. The subjects will orally administer 2.5-mg test drug and 5-mg reference drug. A chiral method was used for bioanalytics and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was employed to quantify the (S)-amlodipine concentrations at various time points after administration. In fasting condition, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 100.24%, 103.63%, and 103.24%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80-125%, satisfying the established bioequivalence criteria. Similarly, upon oral administration of the drugs in the fed condition, the GMRs for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 96.48%, 99.90%, and 99.62%, respectively. The corresponding 90% CIs are within the limits of 80-125%, meeting the predefined bioequivalence standards. Furthermore, both drugs exhibited favorable safety profiles. The results show that the two drugs are bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. The two drugs both had similar PK parameters and good safety.

Urinary benzyl alcohol and hippuric acid in workers exposed to benzyl alcohol during paint stripping work.

This research aimed to develop a reliable gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for detecting urinary benzyl alcohol (BeOH) concentrations and assess its suitability as a biomarker for occupational BeOH exposure. Thirteen male participants exposed to BeOH during paint stripping work provided preshift and postshift urine samples, and their personal exposure concentrations were measured. Meanwhile, a control group of 10 nonexposed workers contributed urine samples. The newly developed GC-MS method met regulatory guidelines. The personal exposure concentrations of BeOH ranged from 8.4 to 45.2mg/m3. Postshift urine samples from exposed participants showed significant BeOH and hippuric acid (HA) concentration increases compared to preshift samples (BeOH, post-/pre-shift geometric mean (GM) ratio = 7.5-7.8, p < 0.001; HA, post-/pre-shift GM ratio = 4.3-4.5, p < 0.001). These levels were considerably higher than those in postshift samples from the nonexposed control group (BeOH, exposed-/nonexposed-workers GM ratio = 14.8-19.0, p < 0.001; HA, exposed-/nonexposed-workers GM ratio = 12.1-15.3, p < 0.001), even after urine density correction. Urinary BeOH and HA can serve as potential biomarkers of occupational exposure to BeOH. More specifically, BeOH might serve as a superior biomarker than HA because it is apparently less influenced by confounding factors such as dietary intake and genetic polymorphism of low-Km aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2). The findings will improve workplace safety measures and protocols, assisting healthcare professionals in diagnosing and managing exposure-related health issues, thereby potentially reducing the risk of occupational exposure to BeOH.

Safety and immunogenicity of a delayed booster dose of the rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine for prevention of Ebola virus disease: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial

rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP is the first approved vaccine with clinical efficacy against Ebola virus disease. Although a seroprotective threshold has not been defined for those at occupational risk of exposure, the current vaccine strategy is to attain a sustained high level of antibody titres. The aim of this trial was to explore the effects of delayed boosting upon both the height and duration of antibody titres following primary immunisation. In this open-label phase 2 randomised controlled trial, we compared antibody titres at month 36in participants who had received a homologous booster dose at month 18following primary immunisation with those who had received no booster. From Oct 25, 2016, to Jan 29, 2020, healthy adults aged 18years or older deemed at occupational risk of exposure to Ebola virus due to laboratory work, clinical duties, or travel to an active endemic region were recruited from four hospital clinics in the USA and one hospital clinic in Canada and received primary vaccination with 2×107 plaque-forming unit per mL of VSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. 18months later, individuals who consented and were still eligible were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a homologous booster dose or no booster. Study visits for safety and serial blood collections for antibody titres were done on enrolled participants at months 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 19, 24, 30, and 36. Through July, 2021, a web-based application was used for randomisation, including assignments with schedules for each of the five sites using mixed permuted blocks. The trial was not masked to participants or site staff. The primary endpoint was a comparison of geometric mean titres (GMTs) of anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein IgG antibody at month 36 (ie, 18months after randomisation) for all randomly assigned participants who completed the 36months of follow-up (primary analysis cohort). Investigators were aware of antibody titres from baseline (enrolment) through month 18but were masked to summary data by randomisation group after month 18. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02788227). Of the 248participants who enrolled and received their primary immunisation, 114proceeded to the randomisation step at month 18. The two randomisation groups were balanced: 57participants (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42years [IQR 35-50]) were randomly assigned to the booster group and 57 (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42years [IQR 36-51]) to the no-booster group. Of those randomly assigned, 92participants (45 in the booster group and 47in the no-booster group) completed 36months of follow-up. At 18months after primary immunisation, GMTs in the no-booster group increased from a baseline of 10ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 7-14) to 1451EU/mL (1118-1882); GMTs in the booster group increased from 9EU/mL (6-16) to 1769EU/mL (1348-2321). At month 19, GMTs were 31 408EU/mL (23 181-42 554) for the booster group and 1406EU/mL (1078-1833) for the no-booster group; at month 36, GMTs were 10 146EU/mL (7960-12 933) for the booster group and 1240EU/mL (984-1563) for the no-booster group. Accordingly, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of antibody titres had increased almost 21-fold more in the booster versus no-booster group at 1month after booster administration (GMR 20·6; 95% CI 18·2-23·0; p<0·0001) and was still over 7-fold higher at month 36 (GMR 7·8; 95% CI 5·5-10·2; p<0·0001). Consistent with previous reports of this vaccine's side-effects, transient mono-articular or oligo-articular arthritis was diagnosed in 18 (9%) of 207primary vaccination recipients; after randomisation, arthritis was diagnosed in one (2%)of 57participants in the no-booster group. No new cases of arthritis developed after booster administration. Four serious adverse events occurred following randomisation: one (epistaxis) in the booster group and three (gastrointestinal haemorrhage, prostate cancer, and tachyarrhythmia) in the no-booster group. None of the serious adverse events was judged attributable to the booster vaccination assignment. In addition to no new safety concerns and in marked contrast to earlier trials evaluating short-term boosting, delaying a rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP booster until month 18resulted in an increase in GMT that remained several-fold above the no-booster group GMT for at least 18months. These findings could have implications for defining the optimal timing of booster doses as pre-exposure prophylaxis in populations at ongoing risk for Ebola virus exposure. The Division of Intramural Research and the Division of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Allergyand Infectious Diseases at the US National Institutes of Health, Canadian Immunization Research Network through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Epinephrine Nasal Spray Versus Intramuscular Epinephrine Autoinjector in Healthy Adults

BackgroundStandard of care for anaphylaxis treatment is intramuscular (IM) epinephrine. An epinephrine nasal spray (ENS) is under development as an alternative form of administration. ObjectiveTo compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of 13.2 mg ENS with 0.3 mg IM epinephrine auto-injector. MethodsData from 4 open-label phase 1 crossover studies conducted in healthy adults were pooled to determine the PK and PD profile of a single 13.2 mg ENS dose delivered by 2 consecutive sprays of 6.6 mg each in opposite (n=224 doses) or the same nostril (n=75 doses) compared with the 0.3 mg IM auto-injector (n=215 doses). Each participant served as their own control. Blood samples and vital signs were collected pre-dose and at multiple intervals from 0-360 minutes post-dose. ResultsENS rapidly increased the plasma epinephrine concentration, with levels that were overall greater than IM auto-injector. Median (range) time to maximum plasma epinephrine concentration with ENS opposite nostrils, ENS same nostril, and IM auto-injector was 25.1 (1.3, 362.1), 20.1 (3.0, 120.2), and 20.0 (1.0, 121.3) minutes, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve for 0-360 minutes was significantly higher with ENS than the IM auto-injector (geometric mean ratio [90% CI]=155% [140%, 172%] with ENS opposite nostrils, 159% [138%, 182%] with ENS same nostril). The PD effects on heart rate and blood pressure were similar in pattern and magnitude among all 3 treatment groups. ConclusionsENS rapidly achieved plasma epinephrine levels greater and more sustained than the IM auto-injector and with a similar PD effect.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of subcutaneously administered CT-P13 (biosimilar of infliximab) via autoinjector and pre-filled syringe in healthy participants.

CT-P13, a biosimilar of infliximab, is used to treat inflammatory diseases that arise from immune system complications, resulting in excessive and persistent inflammation. The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of CT-P13 overcomes the drawback of prolonged administration associated with the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar, necessitating autoinjector (AI) administration. This randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, single-dose clinical pharmacology study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of CT-P13 SC administration via AI compared with the existing pre-filled syringe (PFS) method. A total of 147 healthy participants were randomized into two groups, of which 139 completed the study. Blood samples were collected from before CT-P13 SC administration to 2016 h after the start of the administration. Serum concentrations were analyzed using the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence method. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the AUCinf (areas under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) and Cmax (The maximum serum concentration) for CT-P13 SC AI versus CT-P13 SC PFS groups, were 94.15% (85.02%-104.26%), 92.48% (84.66%-101.01%), respectively. CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS achieved comparable PK because the 90% CI was within the predefined equivalence margin. At the end of the study, immunogenicity results revealed that 70 (97.22%) and 73 (98.65%) participants tested positive for anti-drug antibody (ADA) in the CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS groups, respectively. They were tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. No other significant safety differences were observed between the treatment groups. In conclusion, both administrations demonstrated PK equivalence and were both safe and well-tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of selexipag in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH (SELECT randomised trial).

SELECT was the first global randomised controlled trial of selexipag with standard of care in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. SELECT was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, group-sequential, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03689244). Adults aged ≤85 years in World Health Organization Functional Class I-IV, with a 6-min walk distance of 100-450 m, were randomised (1:1) to receive selexipag (200-1600 µg twice daily titration until individual maximum tolerated dose)+standard of care or placebo+standard of care. Patients were recruited into the haemodynamic set (first 91 randomised patients to undergo right heart catheterisation (RHC); week 20) or non-haemodynamic cohort (remaining patients, no RHC required). The primary end-point was percent of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; week 20). Safety was also assessed. Of 321 patients screened, 128 were randomised (haemodynamic set n=91 (selexipag n=47; placebo n=44)). In the haemodynamic set, 29 (31.9%) patients had previous pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 20 (22.0%) balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 14 (15.4%) both PEA and BPA; 28 (30.8%) were inoperable. The independent data monitoring committee recommended to stop the study for futility as no statistically significant difference was observed for the primary end-point (between-treatment geometric least squares mean ratio of PVR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; p=0.412). Adverse events were reported in 63 (98.4%) and 53 (82.8%) patients for selexipag and placebo, respectively. SELECT was discontinued for futility, as no treatment effect on the primary end-point (PVR) was observed. Safety data were consistent with the established safety profile of selexipag, with no new safety signals identified.

Novel Patient-Friendly Orodispersible Formulation of Ivermectin is Associated With Enhanced Palatability, Controlled Absorption, and Less Variability: High Potential for Pediatric Use.

Ivermectin has been used since the 1980s as an anthelmintic and antiectoparasite agent worldwide. Currently, the only available oral formulation is tablets designed for adult patients. A patient-friendly orodispersible tablet formulation designed for pediatric use (CHILD-IVITAB) has been developed and is entering early phase clinical trials. To inform the pediatric program of CHILD-IVITAB, 16 healthy adults were enrolled in a phase I, single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-period, crossover, single-dose trial which aimed to compare palatability, tolerability, and bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of CHILD-IVITAB and their variability against the marketed ivermectin tablets (STROMECTOL) at a single dose of 12 mg in a fasting state. Palatability with CHILD-IVITAB was considerably enhanced as compared to STROMECTOL. Both ivermectin formulations were well tolerated and safe. Relative bioavailability of CHILD-IVITAB compared to STROMECTOL was estimated as the ratios of geometric means for Cmax, AUC 0-∞, and AUC0-last, which were 1.52 [90% CI: 1.13-2.04], 1.27 [0.99-1.62], and 1.29 [1.00-1.66], respectively. Maximum drug concentrations occurred earlier with the CHILD-IVITAB formulation, with a median Tmax at 3.0 h [range 2.0-4.0 h] versus 4.0 h [range 2.0-5.0 h] with STROMECTOL (P =.004). With CHILD-IVITAB, variability in exposure was cut in half (coefficient of variation: 37% vs 70%) compared to STROMECTOL. Consistent with a more controlled absorption process, CHILD-IVITAB was associated with reduced variability in drug exposure as compared to STROMECTOL. Together with a favorable palatability and tolerability profile, these findings motivate for further clinical studies to evaluate benefits of such a patient-friendly ODT formulation in pediatric patients with a parasitic disease, including infants and young children <15 kg.

Safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dosing of a modified vaccinia Ankara-based vaccine against MERS-CoV in healthy adults: a phase 1b, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.

MERS-CoV is a respiratory pathogen with a case-fatality rate of 36%, and for which no vaccines are currently licensed. MVA-MERS-S is a candidate vaccine based on recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). In this study, the safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dose schedule of MVA-MERS-S was assessed in individuals with previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccines. We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 1b clinical trial at two university medical centres in Germany and the Netherlands. Healthy volunteers aged 18-55 years were assigned by computer randomisation to receive three intramuscular injections of 107 or 108 plaque-forming units (PFU) of MVA-MERS-S, with two treatment groups each of either 28-day or 56-day intervals between the initial two doses, and one control arm that received only placebo, at a ratio of 2:2:2:2:1. The third dose was given after 224 days. The sponsor, clinical and laboratory staff, and participants were masked to both vaccine dose and dosing interval. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the all participants who had received at least one injection; daily solicited vaccine reactions were recorded after each dose for 7 days, unsolicited adverse events for 28 days, and serious adverse events throughout the study. The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity, measured with vaccine-induced geometric mean antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates, analysed in all participants who received at least three allocated treatments. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04119440) and is completed. Between 26 July, 2021, and 3 March, 2022, 244 volunteers were screened, 177 of whom were eligible and 140 were randomly assigned either to the 28-day 107 PFU group (n=32), 56-day 107 PFU group (n=31), 28-day 108 PFU group (n=31), 56-day 108 PFU group (n=30), or placebo group (n=16). In total, 178 doses were administered of 107 PFU of MVA-MERS-S, 174 of 108 PFU, and 164 doses of placebo, and 139 participants received at least one injection. 73 (53%) were female and 66 (48%) were male. No serious vaccine-related adverse events occurred. Solicited local reactions were mild in 288 (93%, 95% CI 90-96) of 309 reports and consisted primarily of pain or tenderness. Pain or tenderness (of any severity) occurred after 69 (39%, 32-46) of 178 107 PFU injections, 138 (79%; 73-85) of 174 108 PFU injections, and 18 (11%; 7-11) of 164 placebo injections. Of 595 reported solicited systemic reactions, 479 (81%, 77-83) were graded as mild. Systemic reactions of any grade occurred after 77 (43%; 36-51) 107 PFU injections, 102 (59%; 51-66) 108 PFU injections, and 67 (41%; 34-49) of 164 placebo injections. At 28 days after the second dose, MERS-CoV neutralising antibodies were highest for participants assigned to 56-day 108 PFU, with geometric mean ratios of 7·2 (95% CI 3·9-13·3) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 108 PFU group (p<0·0001), 3·9 (2·1-7·2) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 56-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0031), and 5·4 (2·9-10·0) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0003). MVA-MERS-S was safe and immunogenic in individuals with previous and concurrent SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The second vaccination with the 108 PFU dose of MVA-MERS-S elicited a stronger humoral immune response when administered 56 days after the first dose than a 28-day interval. Further studies are needed to verify these findings in groups at risk for MERS-CoV exposure, and at risk of severe disease, including older individuals and those with relevant comorbidities. Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the German Centre for Infection Research, and the German Research Foundation.