Geometric Least-squares Mean Ratios Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and safety of GST-HG171, a novel 3CL protease inhibitor, in Chinese subjects with impaired and normal liver function.

GST-HG171 is a potent, broad-spectrum, orally bioavailable small-molecule 3C-like (3CL) protease inhibitor that was recently approved for treating mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 patients in China. Since cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, primarily CYP3A, are the main metabolic enzymes of GST-HG171, hepatic impairment may affect its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Aiming to guide clinical dosing for patients with hepatic impairment, this study, using a non-randomized, open-label, single-dose design, assessed the impact of hepatic impairment on the PK, safety, and tolerability of GST-HG171. Patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment along with healthy subjects were enrolled (n = 8 each), receiving a single oral dose of 150 mg GST-HG171, with concurrent administration of 100 mg ritonavir to sustain CYP3A inhibition before and after GST-HG171 administration (-12, 0, 12, and 24 hours). Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, the geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for GST-HG171's maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time (AUC0-t), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) in subjects with mild hepatic impairment were 1.14 (0.99, 1.31), 1.07 (0.88, 1.30), and 1.07 (0.88, 1.29), respectively. For moderate hepatic impairment, the ratios were 0.87 (0.70, 1.07), 0.82 (0.61, 1.10), and 0.82 (0.61, 1.10), respectively. Hepatic impairment did not significantly alter GST-HG171's peak time (Tmax) and elimination half-life (T1/2). GST-HG171 exhibited good safety and tolerability in the study. Taken together, mild to moderate hepatic impairment minimally impacted GST-HG171 exposure, suggesting no need to adjust GST-HG171 dosage for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment in the clinic.Clinical TrialsRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06106113).

Evaluation of the effect of modafinil on the pharmacokinetics of encorafenib and binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced solid tumors.

A clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) study was designed to evaluate the effect of multiple doses of modafinil, a moderate CYP3A4 inducer at a 400mg QD dose, on the multiple oral dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of encorafenib and its metabolite, LHY746 and binimetinib and its metabolite, AR00426032. This study was conducted in patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced solid tumors. Treatment of 400mg QD modafinil was given on Day 15 through Day 21. Encorafenib 450mg QD and binimetinib 45mg BID were administered starting on Day 1. PK sampling was conducted from 0 to 8h on Day 14 and Day 21. Exposure parameters were calculated for each patient by noncompartmental analysis and geometric least-squares mean ratio. Corresponding 90% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate the magnitude of effects. Among 11 PK evaluable patients, encorafenib Cmax and AUClast were decreased in presence of steady-state modafinil by 20.2% and 23.8%, respectively. LHY746 exposures were not substantially changed in the presence of steady-state modafinil. The results from this clinical study indicate modafinil 400mg QD had a weak effect on encorafenib PK. Based on these results, encorafenib can be coadministered with a moderate CYP3A4 inducer without dosing adjustment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03864042, registered 6 March 2019.

Phase I study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of rezafungin in subjects with moderate/severe hepatic impairment and matched control subjects.

Rezafungin is a second-generation, once-weekly echinocandin antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, including candidemia. In phase II/III studies of rezafungin versus caspofungin, patients with severe hepatic impairment were excluded due to lack of caspofungin data in this population. This open-label, single-dose, phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (primary objective) and safety of rezafungin in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment versus matched, healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. Eight subjects each with moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment were matched 1:1 with healthy subjects for age, sex, and body mass index. Each subject received a single 400-mg, intravenous, 1-h infusion of rezafungin. Plasma pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at various time points through 336 h postdose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis. Safety was assessed throughout. All 32 subjects received study treatment and were included in all analyses. Despite overlapping distributions of total plasma concentrations, based on geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (prior to the start of infusion) to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 32% lower in subjects with moderate (LS mean ratio, 67.55; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 53.91, 84.65) and severe (LS mean ratio, 67.84; 90% CI: 57.49, 80.05) hepatic impairment versus matched healthy subjects. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 12% lower in moderate hepatic impairment and 28% lower in severe hepatic impairment groups. Linear regression showed no significant trend in the degree of hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh score) on AUC0-∞ or Cmax (p > 0.05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in seven subjects (21.9%; three subjects in each of the hepatic impairment groups, and one healthy subject), none of which were severe, serious, or resulted in withdrawal. Rezafungin is well tolerated and can be administered to patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment without the need for dose adjustment. The modest reduction in exposures in subjects with hepatic impairment is not clinically meaningful and is unlikely to impact efficacy.

Relative Bioavailability Study of Midazolam Intramuscularly Administered with the Needle-Free Auto-Injector ZENEO® in Healthy Adults.

Intramuscular (IM) midazolam is indicated for the treatment of status epilepticus. Administration must be efficient to rapidly terminate prolonged seizures and prevent complications. The objective of this study was to compare, in terms of relative bioavailability and bioequivalence, IM midazolam injection by needle-free auto-injector, in different settings, to IM midazolam injection by a conventional syringe and needle. In this open-label, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy adults received single doses of midazolam (10mg) under fasting conditions. The reference treatment (conventional syringe) was administered once, on bare skin in the thigh. The tested treatment (the needle-free auto-injector ZENEO®) was administered three times: on bare skin in the thigh, on bare skin in the ventrogluteal area, and through clothing in the thigh. Repeated plasma samples were collected to obtain 36-h pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Primary PK parameters were area under the plasma concentration-time curve, from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax). Forty adults were enrolled and included in the PK analysis set. In all comparisons, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the least-squares geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%, with low intra-individual coefficients of variation (< 20.5% for all parameters in all comparisons). Bioequivalence was also met for Cmax in all comparisons except when comparing the tested treatment through clothing versus the reference treatment, where the 90% CI lower limit was slightly outside the bioequivalence range (78.8%). With all tested treatments Cmax was slightly lower, but early mean plasma concentrations (first 10min post-dosing) were higher when compared to the reference treatment. In general, all treatments were well tolerated, with maximum sedation 0.5-1h post-injection. This study establishes that IM midazolam injection on bare skin in the thigh with the ZENEO® is bioequivalent to IM midazolam injection with a syringe and needle. An acceptable relative bioavailability, compatible with emergency practice, was also shown in multiple settings. Higher mean concentrations within the first 10min with the ZENEO® device, and quicker two-step injection suggest a faster onset of action, and thereby an earlier seizure termination, thus preventing the occurrence of prolonged seizure and neurological complications. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05026567. Registration first posted August 30, 2021, first patient enrolled May 9, 2022.

Zibotentan Can Be Co-administered with Contraceptives Containing Ethinyl Estradiol and Levonorgestrel: A Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, is being investigated for the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria. To allow women of childbearing potential access to this treatment, highly effective contraception is required and drug interactions compromising contraception reliability must be avoided. This study investigated the risk of pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between zibotentan and the contraceptives ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. A single-sequence, within-participant comparison study was conducted in 24 healthy women of non-childbearing potential, comparing the PK of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel alone and with zibotentan. Single oral doses of 0.06 mg ethinyl estradiol/0.3 mg levonorgestrel were administered on Days 1 and 15; zibotentan 10 mg was dosed orally, once-daily through Days 6-19. PK profiles were determined and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel PK was compared between Day 1 and 15 based on geometric least-squares mean ratios of PK parameters, including maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf). Co-administration with zibotentan did not affect ethinyl estradiol PK (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] Cmax 1.05 [0.99-1.11], AUCinf 1.00 [0.96-1.05]), while a weak interaction (increased exposure) was observed for levonorgestrel (Cmax 1.12 [1.02-1.23], AUCinf 1.30 [1.21-1.39]), which was regarded as without clinical relevance. Plasma exposure of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel was not reduced by multiple-dose zibotentan. In conclusion, contraception containing ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel is regarded possible under zibotentan-containing treatments. This expands choices for women of childbearing potential, supporting diversity in the ZENITH High Proteinuria trial.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in children aged 2 years and older with virologically suppressed HIV: a phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study

Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is a single-tablet regimen and was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with HIV (aged 6 years to <18 years) in a 48-week phase 2/3 trial. In this study, we report data from children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. We conducted this open-label, multicentre, multicohort, single-arm study in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Participants were virologically suppressed children with HIV, aged at least 2 years, weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. Participants received bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) once daily, switching to bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) upon attaining a bodyweight of at least 25 kg. The study included pharmacokinetic evaluation at week 2 to confirm the dose of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for this weight band by comparing with previous adult data. Primary outcomes were bictegravir area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) at week 2, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities until the end of week 24 in all participants who received at least one dose of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02881320. Overall, 22 participants were screened (from Nov 14, 2018, to Jan 11, 2020), completed treatment with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (until week 48), and entered an extension phase. The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio for AUCtau for bictegravir was 7·6% higher than adults (GLSM ratio 107·6%, 90% CI 96·7-119·7); Ctau was 34·6% lower than adults (65·4%, 49·1-87·2). Both parameters were within the target exposure range previously found in adults, children, or both". Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in four (18%) participants by the end week 24 and six (27%) by the end of week 48. Drug-related adverse events occurred in three participants (14%) by the end of week 24 and week 48; none were severe. No Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred by the end of week 24 and week 48. Data support the use of single-tablet coformulated bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) for treatment of HIV in children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. Gilead Sciences.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation study of etomidate: a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy Chinese subjects

Etomidate is a sedative and hypnotic drug through intravenous administration that act on the central nervous system through GABA (Gamma-Amino Butyric Acid) receptors, which is widely used in anesthesia induction and maintenance and long-term sedation in severe patients. The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two etomidate fat emulsions after administration through the intravenous infusion pump in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was performed in 52 healthy subjects. The wash-out period was 7 days. Blood samples and pharmacodynamic index values were collected at the specified time points. Etomidate concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using a non-compartment model method. Pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated using pharmacodynamic index values. The study also evaluated the safety of the etomidate. Both the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic parameters result of the test and reference formulation were very similar. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratios of the test to reference formulation were 91.33–104.96% for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 97.21–102.03% for the area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC0–t), and 97.22–102.33% for the area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞). Meanwhile, the 90% CI of the GLSM ratios of the test to reference formulation were 102.28–110.69% for the minimal BIS value (BISmin), 99.23–101.17% for the area under the BIS time curve from time 0–60 min after administration (BISAUC0–60 min), respectively. The 90% CI of these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters all fall in the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%. No serious adverse events occurred during the study. This study has shown that the etomidate fat emulsion test and reference formulation had similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in vivo. The two formulations exhibited good safety and well-tolerance.Clinical trials registration number:http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html. # CTR20191836.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase 1 study comparing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of denosumab biosimilar CT‑P41 and reference denosumab in healthy males

ABSTRACT Background This study’s objective was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity and safety of denosumab biosimilar, CT‑P41, and United States–licensed reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in healthy male Asian adults, considering also pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes. Research design and methods This double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, Phase 1 study randomized (1:1) healthy males to a single (60-mg) subcutaneous dose of CT‑P41 or US-denosumab. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration – time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0–inf), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–last), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). PK equivalence was determined if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ratios of geometric least-squares means (gLSMs) were within the predefined 80–125% equivalence margin. Secondary PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity outcomes were also evaluated. Results Of 154 participants randomized (76 CT‑P41; 78 US-denosumab), 151 received study drug (74 CT‑P41; 77 US-denosumab). Primary and secondary PK results, PD results, safety, and immunogenicity were comparable between groups. Ninety percent CIs for ratios of gLSMs were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC0–inf (100.4–114.7), AUC0–last (99.9–114.3), and Cmax (95.2–107.3). Conclusions Following a single dose in healthy males, CT‑P41 demonstrated PK equivalence with US-denosumab. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06037395

Comparative Bioavailability of DFD-29 (Minocycline Hydrochloride Modified Release Capsules, 40 mg) Vs. Minocycline Hydrochloride Extended Release 105-mg tablets After a Single Oral Dose: A Randomized, 3-way Crossover Study

Background: A low-dose formulation (DFD-29) of minocycline hydrochloride (HCl) is under evaluation for the treatment of moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea. The objective of this phase 1 study is to compare the bioavailability of DFD-29 to that of the currently available Solodyn® (minocycline HCl extended release) 105-mg formulation. Methods: This single-center, randomized, open-label, laboratory-blinded, 3-way, 6-sequence crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of DFD-29 40 mg after an overnight fast, DFD-29 40 mg after a high-fat meal, and minocycline HCl extended release 105-mg tablet (minocycline HCl ER 105 mg) after an overnight fast in healthy adult volunteers. Blood samples were collected for PK assessments prior to and up to 72 hours after each drug dose, with a washout period of 7 calendar days between doses. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory tests. Results: A total of 24 subjects were randomized and 23 subjects completed the study. Mean plasma minocycline Cmax levels were 243.9 ng/mL for DFD-29 (fasting), 225.0 ng/mL for DFD-29 (fed), and 497.3 ng/mL for minocycline HCl ER 105 mg (fasting). The geometric least squares (LS) mean ratios for Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of DFD-29 to minocycline HCl ER 105 mg when administered after fasting were 47.97%, 36.55%, and 38.35%, respectively. When comparing fasting vs fed administration of DFD-29, geometric LS mean ratios for Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ were 97.48%, 116.84%, and 115.26% respectively. Tmax was 1.5 h for DFD-29 (fasting), 4.5 h for DFD-29 (fed), and 4.0 h for minocycline HCl ER 105 mg (fasting). Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 17.4%, 13.0%, and 21.7% after administration of DFD-29 (fasting), DFD-29 (fed), and minocycline HCl ER 105 mg, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild in severity (21/22; 95.5%). Conclusion: Bioavailability was significantly lower after a single dose of DFD-29 40 mg vs minocycline HCl ER 105 mg following a single dose under fasting and fed conditions. Food intake had no impact on Cmax but may delay absorption and may slightly increase exposure. Overall, single oral doses of DFD-29 40 mg and minocycline HCl ER 105 mg were generally safe and well tolerated. This study and abstract are funded by Journey Medical Corporation.

Efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy (PROTECT): 2-year results from a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial

Sparsentan, a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist, significantly reduced proteinuria versus irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, at 36 weeks (primary endpoint) in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the phase 3 PROTECT trial's previously reported interim analysis. Here, we report kidney function and outcomes over 110 weeks from the double-blind final analysis. PROTECT, a double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 study, was done across 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries throughout the Americas, Asia, and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven primary IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of at least 1·0 g per day despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibition for at least 12 weeks were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sparsentan (target dose 400 mg oral sparsentan once daily) or irbesartan (target dose 300 mg oral irbesartan once daily) based on a permuted-block randomisation method. The primary endpoint was proteinuria change between treatment groups at 36 weeks. Secondary endpoints included rate of change (slope) of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), changes in proteinuria, a composite of kidney failure (confirmed 40% eGFR reduction, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality), and safety and tolerability up to 110 weeks from randomisation. Secondary efficacy outcomes were assessed in the full analysis set and safety was assessed in the safety set, both of which were defined as all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of randomly assigned study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850. Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 203 patients were randomly assigned to the sparsentan group and 203 to the irbesartan group. One patient from each group did not receive the study drug and was excluded from the efficacy and safety analyses (282 [70%] of 404 included patients were male and 272 [67%] were White) . Patients in the sparsentan group had a slower rate of eGFR decline than those in the irbesartan group. eGFR chronic 2-year slope (weeks 6-110) was -2·7 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year versus -3·8 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (difference 1·1 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year, 95% CI 0·1 to 2·1; p=0·037); total 2-year slope (day 1-week 110) was -2·9 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year versus -3·9 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (difference 1·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year, 95% CI -0·03 to 1·94; p=0·058). The significant reduction in proteinuria at 36 weeks with sparsentan was maintained throughout the study period; at 110 weeks, proteinuria, as determined by the change from baseline in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, was 40% lower in the sparsentan group than in the irbesartan group (-42·8%, 95% CI -49·8 to -35·0, with sparsentan versus -4·4%, -15·8 to 8·7, with irbesartan; geometric least-squares mean ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·50 to 0·72). The composite kidney failure endpoint was reached by 18 (9%) of 202 patients in the sparsentan group versus 26 (13%) of 202 patients in the irbesartan group (relative risk 0·7, 95% CI 0·4 to 1·2). Treatment-emergent adverse events were well balanced between sparsentan and irbesartan, with no new safety signals. Over 110 weeks, treatment with sparsentan versus maximally titrated irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy resulted in significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function. Travere Therapeutics.

Effect of Omeprazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Extended-Release Nifedipine in Healthy Subjects.

Oral extended-release (ER) dosage forms have been used to sustain blood drug levels, reduce adverse events, and improve patient compliance. We investigated potential effects of comedication on pharmacokinetic exposure of nifedipine ER products with different formulation designs and manufacturing processes. A clinical study compared a generic version of nifedipine ER tablet with pH-dependent dissolution behavior with an osmotic pump product with pH independent drug release under fasting condition. In this study, two nifedipine tablet products were tested with or without short-term omeprazole comedication in healthy subjects. Seven-day administration of omeprazole before nifedipine dosing significantly increased the gastric pH, and subsequently increased the geometric least square (LS) means of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable timepoint (AUC0-t ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of nifedipine to 132.6% (90% confidence interval (CI): 120.6-145.7%) and 112.8% (90% CI: 100.8-126.3%) for pH-dependent ER tablets, and 120.6% (90% CI: 109.7-132.5%) and 122.5% (90% CI: 113.7-131.9%) for the pH-independent ER tablets, respectively. Similar extent of increase in AUC0-t and Cmax was confirmed in the subpopulations whose gastric pH was ≥ 4 or ≤ 3 in subjects with or without omeprazole administration. Given that similar increases in drug exposures were observed for both pH-dependent and pH-independent nifedipine formulations and the geometric LS mean ratios were between 112% and 133% with and without short-term omeprazole comedication, the gastric pH may have limited effects on omeprazole-induced nifedipine PK changes on the tested formulations. The inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 activity may play a significant role causing nifedipine exposure changes for both formulations, which would warrant additional assessment.

Investigation of the Effect of Lasmiditan on the Pharmacokinetics of P-Glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Substrates.

Lasmiditan is an invitro inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) efflux transporters. We aimed to confirm predictions from physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of lasmiditan, and assess the safety and tolerability of rosuvastatin and dabigatran co-administered with lasmiditan. In this open-label, post-marketing drug-drug interaction, phase1 clinical trial, eligible participants were adults aged 21-70years with a body mass index of 18.5-35.0kg/m2 . Part1 (P-gp, 150mg dabigatran etexilate with 200mg lasmiditan) and part2 (BCRP, 10mg rosuvastatin with 200mg lasmiditan) employed similar designs: a single dose of probe substrate administered on day-2 with pharmacokinetic evaluation; 1-week washout; lasmiditan administered on days8 and 9 alone; lasmiditan co-administered with a single dose of probe substrate on day10, with pharmacokinetic evaluation of probe substrate and lasmiditan. Sixty-six participants were included in part1 and 30 participants were included in part2. Following dabigatran co-administration with lasmiditan, versus dabigatran alone, 90% confidence intervals for geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax ) were not contained within the non-effect boundaries (0.80 to 1.25). Dabigatran AUC0-∞ increased by 25% and Cmax increased by 22%. The median time of maximum observed drug concentration (tmax ) for dabigatran was 2.0 to 3.0hours. Following rosuvastatin co-administration with lasmiditan, versus rosuvastatin alone, 90%CIs for geometric LS mean ratios of AUC0-∞ and Cmax were contained within non-effect boundaries (0.80-1.25). Rosuvastatin AUC0-∞ increased by 15% and Cmax increased by 7%. The median tmax for rosuvastatin was 4.0hours. Results suggest that lasmiditan has a weak effect on P-gp substrates and no clinically relevant effect on BCRP substrates.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Mirogabalin Orally Disintegrating Tablets and Conventional Tablets in Healthy Japanese Participants.

This single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-group, 2-stage crossover trial evaluated the bioequivalence of 15mg of mirogabalin as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) with conventional mirogabalin tablets in healthy Japanese men. The trial involved two studies: in Study 1, the ODT formulation was taken without water, and in Study 2, the ODT formulation was taken with water. The conventional tablet was taken with water in both studies. We investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence of the 2 formulations, including the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time. The plasma concentrations of mirogabalin were determined by a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. A total of 72 participants were enrolled and completed the trial. The geometric least-squares mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration of the ODT formulation to the conventional formulation were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 (Study 1, 0.995; Study 2, 1.009), as was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time (Study 1, 1.023; Study 2, 1.035). No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, mirogabalin 15-mg ODTs, either with or without water, were bioequivalent to conventional 15-mg tablets.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of candidate tocilizumab biosimilar CT-P47 versus reference tocilizumab: a randomized, double-blind, single-dose phase I study

ABSTRACT Background CT-P47 is a candidate tocilizumab biosimilar. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence of CT-P47 and European Union-approved reference tocilizumab (EU-tocilizumab) in healthy Asian adults. Research design and methods This double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group trial randomized healthy adults (1:1) to receive a single (162 mg/0.9 mL) subcutaneous dose of CT-P47 or EU-tocilizumab. The primary endpoint (Part 2) was PK equivalence by area under the concentration – time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–last), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0–inf), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). PK equivalence was concluded if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of geometric least-squares means (gLSMs) were within the 80–125% equivalence margin. Additional PK endpoints, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Results In Part 2, 289 participants were randomized (146 CT-P47; 143 EU-tocilizumab); 284 received study drug. AUC0–last, AUC0–inf, and Cmax were equivalent between CT-P47 and EU-tocilizumab: 90% CIs for the ratios of gLSMs were within the 80–125% equivalence margin. Secondary PK endpoints, immunogenicity, and safety were comparable between groups. Conclusions CT-P47 demonstrated PK equivalence with EU-tocilizumab and was well tolerated, following a single dose in healthy adults. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05188378.

Brigatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic hepatic impairment

SummaryBrigatinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, parallel-group study investigated the effect of chronic hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of brigatinib to inform dosing recommendations for these patients. Participants with hepatic impairment classified according to Child-Pugh categories of mild (A), moderate (B), or severe (C) and matched-healthy participants with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of 90-mg brigatinib. Plasma samples were collected for the determination of brigatinib plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma PK parameters. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled (Child-Pugh A–C, n = 6 each; matched-healthy participants, n = 9). The mean fraction of free plasma brigatinib was comparable for the Child-Pugh A (11.1%), Child-Pugh B (10.8%), and healthy participant groups (8.5%); free brigatinib was higher in the Child-Pugh C group (23.1%). There were no clinically meaningful effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on unbound systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of brigatinib (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% CI] of 89.32% [69.79%–114.31%] and 99.55% [77.78%–127.41%], respectively). In the severe hepatic impairment group, brigatinib unbound AUC was approximately 37% higher (geometric least-squares mean ratio [90% CI] of 137.41% [107.37%–175.86%]) compared with healthy participants with normal hepatic function. Brigatinib was well tolerated in healthy participants and in participants with hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The brigatinib dose should be reduced by approximately 40% for patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Open-label, drug-drug interaction study between the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 and a metabolic probe cocktail in healthy participants.

GSK3640254 (GSK'254) is an HIV-1 maturation inhibitor with pharmacokinetics (PK) supporting once-daily dosing. GSK'254 will be co-administered with cytochrome P450 enzyme substrates and drug transporters, including other antiretrovirals, in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH). In this open-label study, healthy participants received a single dose of a cocktail of eight cytochrome P450 and transporter probe substrates on Day 1, followed by a 10-day washout before receiving GSK'254 200 mg once daily from Days 11 to 20 and a single dose of cocktail + GSK'254 200 mg on Day 21. Geometric least-squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals were obtained using linear mixed-effects models. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Of 20 participants enrolled, 19 completed the study. Plasma concentrations of all cocktail substrates were generally similar with or without GSK'254 co-administration. All 90% confidence intervals around geometric least-squares mean ratios for cocktail substrate PK parameters indicated no to weak interactions. Steady-state plasma GSK'254 concentrations were achieved by Day 17 and maintained through Day 21. Nine participants (45%) reported 17 AEs; most (88%) were grade 1. Two grade 2 treatment-related AEs (maculopapular rash [leading to withdrawal] and papular rash) were reported during GSK'254 administration alone. Co-administration of GSK'254 with a metabolic probe cocktail in healthy participants indicated very low risk of clinically relevant effect on PK of any substrates or associated metabolites. No new safety/tolerability concerns were identified. These results support ongoing phase IIb and planned phase III studies of GSK'254 in people living with HIV-1.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 (40mg/0.4ml) versus reference adalimumab: randomized study in healthy Japanese adults.

Aim: Comparing pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 and EU-approved reference adalimumab (EU-adalimumab) in Japan. Materials & methods: Double-blind, parallel-group phase I trial at three hospitals. Healthy Japanese adults were randomized (1:1) to CT-P17 or EU-adalimumab (single 40-mg subcutaneous dose). The primary end point was pharmacokinetic equivalence for area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum serumconcentration. Results: Of the 205 randomized subjects (102 CT-P17, 103 EU-adalimumab), 204 received study drug. CT-P17 and EU-adalimumab were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% CIs for geometric least-squares mean ratios were within predefined 80-125% equivalence margins. Secondary pharmacokinetic end points, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the groups. Conclusion: CT-P17 had pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity comparable to EU-adalimumab in healthy Japanese adults.

Effect of Food (Low and High Fat) on Pharmacokinetics of FCN-159, a Selective MEK Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Males.

FCN-159 is a novel, oral, potent, selective MEK1/2 inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of NRAS-mutant advanced melanoma and neurofibromatosis type 1. We investigated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of FCN-159. In this single-center, open-label, phase 1 study with a three-period, three-sequence, crossover design, healthy Chinese male subjects (n = 24) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single, oral 8mg dose of FCN-159 in the fasted state (overnight, > 10h), and with a low-fat and a high-fat meal, separated by a 10-day washout. PK parameters including time to maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were compared using geometric least-squares mean ratios (GLSMR), with the fasted state as the reference. A 90% CI for the GLSMR within 80-125% indicated no significant food effect. A low-fat meal (n = 23) did not affect the PK profile of FCN-159: G LSMR for AUC from time 0 to t (AUC0-t), 106.9% (90% CI 99.9-114.4%); AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), 106.8% (90% CI 100.0-114.0%); Cmax, 96.4% (90% CI 83.9-110.8%). A high-fat meal (n = 24) did not affect exposure to FCN-159 (GLSMR for AUC0-t, 99.4%; 90% CI 99.0-106.3%; AUC0-∞, 99.5 5%; 90% CI 93.2-106.1%), but modestly reduced Cmax by 15% (GLSMR 84.9%; 90% CI 74.0-97.3%). Both the low-fat and high-fat meals slightly prolonged the median time to Cmax by 0.5h (90% CI 0.5-1.0h). FCN-159 was generally well tolerated, with a lower incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events following administration in the fasted state than with a low-fat or high-fat meal (20.8%, 39.1%, and 37.5%, respectively). Food did not affect the PK profile of FCN-159 to a clinically meaningful extent compared with administration in the fasted state.

A phase III, randomised, double-blind, multi-national clinical trial comparing SB12 (proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and reference eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

Treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) includes the monoclonal antibody eculizumab. This randomised, double-blind, multi-national cross-over Phase III study in PNH patients aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of the proposed eculizumab biosimilar SB12 and reference eculizumab (Soliris, ECU). PNH patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥1·5× upper limit of normal were randomised into treatment sequences SB12-ECU or ECU-SB12. Four weekly infusions of 600mg eculizumab were followed by fortnightly infusions of 900mg until week 50 (ECU/SB12 cross-over at week 26). Primary endpoints were LDH at week 26 and the time-adjusted area under the effect curve (AUEC) of LDH over weeks 14‒26 and 40‒52. Among 46 patients (92%) who completed the study, the least squares mean (LSM) difference in LDH at week 26 (34·48; 95% confidence interval [CI] -47·66‒116·62U/l) and geometric LSM ratio of time-adjusted AUEC of LDH (1·08; 90% CI 0·95‒1·23) were within pre-defined equivalence margins. Mean numbers of transfused red blood cell units, other secondary endpoints, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were comparable. No patients developed anti-drug antibodies. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 72% and 68% of patients in the SB12 and ECU treatment groups, respectively. The results demonstrate equivalence of SB12 to ECU and support SB12-use in PNH patients.

Impact of Sotorasib on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Metformin, a MATE1/2K Substrate, in Healthy Subjects.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of sotorasib on metformin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the effect of metformin on sotorasib pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Sotorasib is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene homolog (KRAS) G12C mutant protein (KRASG12C) protein approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2021 for the treatment of KRASG12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adults who have received at least one prior systemic therapy METHODS: This was a phase I, single-center, open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study. Subjects received single oral doses of metformin 850 mg, sotorasib 960 mg, and metformin 850 mg with sotorasib 960 mg. Urine and plasma were collected and assayed for metformin and sotorasib pharmacokinetics. Blood glucose was also measured for metformin pharmacodynamics. In addition, an in vitro study was conducted to determine whether sotorasib was an inhibitor of MATE1/2K or OCT2 transport. Geometric least-squares mean ratio of sotorasib area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and peak plasma concentration were 0.910 and 0.812, respectively, when sotorasib was coadministered with metformin compared with administration of sotorasib alone. Geometric least-squares mean ratio of metformin area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and peak plasma concentration were 0.99 and 1.00, respectively, when comparing metformin coadministered with sotorasib to metformin alone. Geometric mean estimates of serum glucose area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 2 h following metformin alone, sotorasib alone, and metformin with sotorasib were 179, 222, and 194, respectively. These results demonstrated that coadministration of metformin with sotorasib does not impact sotorasib exposure to a clinically significant extent. Coadministration of sotorasib with metformin does not affect metformin exposure or its antihyperglycemic effect, in contrast to the inhibitory effect observed in vitro. Doses of sotorasib 960 mg and metformin 850 mg were safe and well tolerated when coadministered to healthy subjects.