Rating Scale Pain Scores Research Articles

Does the Combination of Platelet-rich Plasma and Supervised Exercise Yield Better Pain Relief and Enhanced Function in Knee Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability with substantial healthcare costs, and efficient nonsurgical treatment methods are still needed. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and exercise therapy are used frequently in clinical practice. Whether PRP or PRP combined with exercise is more effective than exercise alone is unclear. (1) Which treatment relieves knee osteoarthritis pain better: PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise? (2) Does PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise yield better results in terms of the WOMAC score, performance on the 40-m fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score? In this randomized, controlled, three-arm clinical trial, we recruited patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II or III) knee osteoarthritis with a minimum of 3 points on the 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. During the study period, 157 patients with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were screened and 84 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) into either the exercise group (28), PRP group (28), or PRP + exercise group (28). Follow-up proportions were similar between the groups (exercise: 89% [25], PRP: 86% [24], PRP + exercise: 89% [25]; p = 0.79). All patients were analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. There were no between-group differences in age, gender, arthritis severity, and baseline clinical scores (pain, WOMAC, functional performance tests, and health-related quality of life). The exercise group underwent a 6-week structured program consisting of 12 supervised individual sessions focused on strengthening and functional exercises. Meanwhile, the PRP group received three weekly injections of fresh, leukocyte-poor PRP. The PRP + exercise group received a combined treatment with both interventions. The primary outcome was knee pain over 24 weeks, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain, with a minimum clinically important difference [MCID] of 2). The secondary outcome measures included the WOMAC index (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a lower level of disability and an MCID of 12), the durations of the 40-meter fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score. For the a priori sample size calculation, we used the numeric rating scale score for pain at 24 weeks as the primary outcome variable. The MCID for the numeric rating scale was deemed to be 2 points, with an estimated standard deviation of 2.4. Based on sample size calculations, a sample of 24 patients per group would provide 80% power to detect an effect of this size between the groups at the significance level of p = 0.05. We found no clinically important differences in improvements in pain-defined as ≥ 2 points of 10-at 24 weeks when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (1.9 ± 0.7 versus 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 1.4 ± 0.6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -0.5 [95% confidence interval -1.2 to 0.4]; p = 0.69). Likewise, we found no differences in WOMAC scores at 24 weeks of follow-up when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (10 ± 9 versus 26 ± 20 versus 7 ± 6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -3 [95% CI -12 to -5]; p = 0.97). There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcome metrics among the PRP + exercise and exercise groups. PRP did not improve pain at 24 weeks of follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared with exercise alone. Moreover, exercise alone was clinically superior to PRP alone, considering function and the physical component of health-related quality of life. Despite the additional costs and endeavors related to PRP products, the combination of PRP and exercise did not differ from exercise alone. The results of this randomized controlled trial do not support the use of PRP injections in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis. Consequently, exercise alone is the recommended treatment for reducing pain and enhancing function throughout this timeframe. Level I, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Comfort and Patient Preference of Common and a Novel Position for Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Injections.

This study compared levels of discomfort among three positions for ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injections (USCTI) to potentially facilitate and improve the procedure's tolerability in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Ambulatory Veterans referred for electromyography (EMG) evaluation of CTS were eligible for the study; a total of 30 participants were evaluated. Participants were asked to hold three different positions: 1) Hypersupination, 2) Airplane, and 3) total supported abduction (TSA). Participants rated their pain level, ease of performing/holding each position, exacerbation of underlying symptoms, and position preference. Results were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Hypersupination was determined to be the least preferred and most painful position to hold, demonstrating a statistically significant increase in the Numeric Rating Scale score for pain during the procedure compared with Airplane and TSA, which were not significantly different from one another. Pre-procedure neck, shoulder, elbow, and wrist pain were not significantly associated with intra-procedure pain. When performing USCTI, patient comfort can be optimized by avoiding Hypersupination. Utilizing the Airplane or TSA positions may provide similar access for ulnar approach injections while inducing lower levels of discomfort. Clinical space, resources, patient mobility, and laterality of procedures may further guide one's selection among the positions.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and PRO Remission Rates in 12,262 Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Routine Care.

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after initiation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in European real-world patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Further, to investigate PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at disease onset. Visual analog scale or numerical rating scale scores for pain, fatigue, patient global assessment (PtGA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) from 12,262 patients with PsA initiating a TNFi in 13 registries were pooled. PRO remission rates (pain ≤ 1, fatigue ≤ 2, PtGA ≤ 2, and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5) were calculated for patients still on the treatment. For the first TNFi, median pain score was reduced by approximately 50%, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; as were fatigue scores, from 6 to 4, 4, and 3; PtGA scores, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; and HAQ-DI scores, from 0.9 to 0.5, 0.5, and 0.4 at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Six-month Lund Efficacy Index (LUNDEX)-adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 24%, 31%, 36%, and 43% (first TNFi); 14%, 19%, 23%, and 29% (second TNFi); and 9%, 14%, 17%, and 20% (third TNFi), respectively. For biologic-naïve patients with disease duration < 5 years, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 22%, 28%, 33%, and 42%, respectively. Corresponding rates for patients with disease duration > 10 years were 27%, 32%, 41%, and 43%, respectively. Remission rates were 33%, 40%, 45%, and 56% for men and 17%, 23%, 24%, and 32% for women, respectively. For patients aged < 45 years at diagnosis, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rate for pain was 29% vs 18% for patients ≥ 45 years. In 12,262 biologic-naïve patients with PsA, 6 months of treatment with a TNFi reduced pain by approximately 50%. Marked differences in PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at onset of disease were observed, emphasizing the potential influence of factors other than disease activity on PROs.

Nurse-led ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block: A randomised controlled trial of two different patient flow systems in an emergency department

IntroductionElderly with hip fractures present complex challenges. Effective pain management is crucial for recovery and quality of life. However, pain control can be difficult and requires customized care. MethodsWe conducted an unblinded, randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in patients with hip fracture performed by specially trained nurses (Group Nurse) compared to anaesthesiologists (Group Anaesthesiologist). The hypothesis was that a single shot ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block would result in a total summarized lower dynamic numeric rating scale score for pain intensity during the first 120 min after admission for patients in Group Nurse compared to Group Anaesthesiologist measured in five timepoints. The primary outcome was measured by a cumulative numeric rating scale score for dynamic pain (with flexion of the hip until maximum 30° from bed surface) during the first 120 min after admission to the emergency department. ResultsFrom February 2020 to June 2021, 263 patients were screened, of which 42 (16.0%) consented and were randomly allocated; 21 in each arm. The primary outcome was not different between groups (p = 0.24), and displayed no substantial superiority of specially trained nurses over anaesthesiologist. No complications or adverse effects were observed in either group. The use of systemic analgesics and the development of delirium was similar between the two groups. In the Nurse Group, patients were administered their ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block earlier. ConclusionOur study did not demonstrate a statistically significant beneficial effect of specially trained nurses over anaesthesiologist on cumulative pain in performing ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks, while no side-effects/complications or adverse effects were observed in either group. ClinicaltrialThe trial was registered on October 31, 2019 at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04145752).

Fluoroscopic Confirmation of Needle Location in Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of genicular nerves is an effective treatment for chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis. The procedure can be performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasonographic guidance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to fluoroscopically check the final location of the needle in ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation and evaluate the treatment’s success in patients with knee pain. STUDY DESIGN: A 2-center, prospective study. SETTING: A private clinic and a tertiary care health center. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had unilateral knee pain, and grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification were included. Following diagnostic genicular nerve blocks in patients whose knee pain was relieved by &gt;= 50%, radiofrequency thermocoagulation was applied to these nerves. The final position of the needle was checked via fluoroscopy in anteroposterior and lateral planes. RESULTS: The needle was located in the one-third anterior portion of the bone shaft in 69 of 96 patients (71.9%), between one-third and two-thirds in 21 (21.9%), and in the one-third posterior portion in 6 (6.3%). The mean Numeric Rating Scale score for pain was 7.69 ± 0.99 before treatment, 4.03 ± 1.26 at one week, 2.53 ± 1.24 at one month, and 2.19 ± 1.71 at 3 months, indicating a statistically significant decrease (P &lt; 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The lack of a study group in which genicular nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation was performed under fluoroscopy guidance could be cited among the limitations of this clinical study. CONCLUSIONS: The final position of the needle tip in radiofrequency thermocoagulation of genicular nerves can exist at the one-third anterior of the bone shaft, without a need for further advancing the needle to the posterior portion. Although performed more distally compared to fluoroscopy guidance, ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation still provides effective analgesia. KEY WORDS: Genicular nerve, radiofrequency ablation, knee osteoarthritis, interventional ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, pain management

Lower abdominal approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A propensity score-matching analysis and prospective cohort study

BackgroundClassic laparoscopic cholecystectomy) using multiple ports is a widely used method with excellent surgical outcomes. However, the resulting wounds do not meet the cosmetic needs of patients. Therefore, this study aimed to find a new minimally invasive surgical method for invisible wounds while maintaining surgical safety through a new port site. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we used propensity score matching analysis to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy using articulating devices with the lower abdominal approach. We performed a propensity score matching analysis of prospectively maintained data from 228 patients who underwent classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy using straight instruments and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a lower abdominal approach using articulating devices between January and October 2022. A single surgeon performed all operations included in the study. We evaluated several perioperative outcomes. ResultsNo differences were found in potential confounding factors, such as sex, age, admission type, previous abdominal surgery, and medical comorbidities, between the 2 groups after propensity score matching. In the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group, the mean operation time was shorter (43.73 ± 23.71 vs 50.60 ± 9.75 min; P < .04). No significant difference was noted in the 2 groups’ numerical rating scale scores for pain, body mass index, and incidence of postoperative complications. The mean length of hospital stay was longer for patients who underwent classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.27 vs 2.07 days; P = .064). The lower abdominal laparoscopic cholecystectomy group had delayed defecation after surgery. ConclusionRegarding surgical outcomes and minimal invasiveness, lower abdominal laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible cholecystectomy method.

Patient enablement and health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back and knee pain: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Chronic back and knee pain impairs health- related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient enablement can improve HRQoL. To determine whether enablement was a moderator of the effect of chronic back and knee pain on HRQoL. A cross-sectional study of Chinese patients with chronic back and knee problems in public primary care clinics in Hong Kong. Each participant completed the Chinese Patient Enablement Instrument-2 (PEI-2), the Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Pain Rating Scale (PRS). Multivariable regression examined the effects of PRS score and PEI-2 score on WOMAC total score. A moderation regression model and simple slope analysis were used to evaluate whether the interaction between enablement (PEI-2) and pain (PRS) had a significant effect on HRQoL (WOMAC). Valid patient-reported outcome data from 1306 participants were analysed. PRS score was associated with WOMAC total score (β = 0.326, P<0.001), whereas PEI-2 score was associated inversely with WOMAC total score (β = -0.260, P<0.001) and PRS score. The effect of the interaction between PRS and PEI-2 (PRS × PEI-2) scores on WOMAC total score was significant (β = -0.191, P<0.001) suggesting PEI-2 was a moderator. Simple slope analyses showed that the relationship between PRS and WOMAC was stronger for participants with a low level of PEI-2 (gradient 3.056) than for those with a high level of PEI-2 (gradient 1.746). Patient enablement moderated the impact of pain on HRQoL. A higher level of enablement can lessen impairment in HRQoL associated with chronic back and knee pain.

Effect of Educational Tools on the use of Patient-Controlled Analgesia Devices.

In the literature, there are confusing data about educational tools and device use. Therefore, it is not clear which method is superior to the other. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of educational tools on patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) usage in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Ninety-six patients undergoing hysterectomy were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to a group (verbal, brochure, or video) consisting of 32 patients each using the closed envelope method. After operations, all patients were sent to the ward and evaluated with numerical rating scale score for pain at 15th min., 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th hours. Given dose, the number of button presses, presence of nausea and vomiting, and static and dynamic pain scores were recorded. During visits, patients who had a pain score ≥4 were administered paracetamol 1 g IV. Ondansetron 8 mg IV was injected into patients who had nausea and vomiting. No significant differences were determined in resting and dynamic pain scores, number of button presses, and given doses between groups at 15th min., 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th hours. In this study, education type did not affect PCA device use. We believe that whatever method the infrastructure of hospitals is suitable for, should be used for PCA device education.

Safety and utility of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block for headaches and orofacial pain: a retrospective, single-center study of 10 patients

BackgroundSeveral new ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglia blocks (U-SCGBs) have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional superior cervical ganglia blocks; however, their clinical utility and practicality have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and utility of a new method of U-SCGB.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent U-SCGB for the treatment of headaches and orofacial pain at a single center. U-SCGB was performed by injecting 2–3 mL of 1% mepivacaine posterior to the internal carotid artery, just above the bifurcation. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pain scores. Numerical data are expressed as the mean ± standard error.ResultsThe total number of U-SCGB procedures was 43. All procedures were accompanied by Horner’s sign. The numerical rating scale score for pain (possible scores, 0–10) was reduced predominantly from 7.0 ± 0.7 before treatment to 4.5 ± 0.7 at the follow-up (p = 0.014).ConclusionU-SCGB was considered a clinically useful and accurate treatment for headaches and orofacial pain in this study.

Association of phase angle with sarcopenia in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients: a retrospective study

BackgroundIn chronic musculoskeletal pain patients, detection of sarcopenia is of significant clinical interest. Phase angle, which can be measured through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), can detect sarcopenia; however, the evidence in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients is limited. This study aimed to assess the relationship between phase angle and sarcopenia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our hypothesis was that phase angle would be a useful indicator to identify sarcopenia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.MethodsA total of 190 patients (51 men and 139 women) with chronic musculoskeletal pain were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Patient data of backgrounds, numeric rating scale score for pain, skeletal muscle index, and phase angle assessed using BIA were retrospectively reviewed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria 2019.ResultsA total of 51 patients (26.7%), including 10 men (19.6%) and 41 women (29.5%), were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Phase angle, sarcopenia-related factors, age, and body mass index (BMI) differed significantly in patients with and without sarcopenia. On multiple logistic regression analysis, the prevalence of sarcopenia was significantly correlated with phase angle and BMI. The areas under the curve exhibited high accuracy in discriminating sarcopenia in men and moderate accuracy in both sexes and in women.ConclusionsPhase angle may be a valid discriminator of sarcopenia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Effect of a needle-free system versus traditional anesthesia on pain perception during palatal injections in children.

Needle-free injection systems can contribute to the prevention of needle-related pain during palatal infiltration anesthesia (PIA) in children. Research on this topic in children is required. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness and patient preference of a needle-free system versus traditional anesthesia (TA) on pain perception during PIA in children. The study was designed as a randomized, controlled crossover clinical study with 48 children aged 6-12 years requiring dental treatment with PIA in bilateral maxillary primary molars. TA was applied on one side and the Comfort-in™ injection system (CIS) on the other side in two separate sessions. Then, patient preference was recorded. The pain perception during PIA was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (PRS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. The data were analyzed for statistical significance (p < .05). There were statistically significant differences between the TA and the CIS according to the PRS and FLACC Scale scores. On both scales, significantly higher pain ratings were observed in the TA group during PIA (p < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of patient preference (p < .001). Although 77.1% (n=37) of the children preferred the CIS, 22.9% (n=11) preferred the TA. Moreover, patient preference for the CIS was significantly higher in older children (p < .01). The application of a needle-free system during PIA ensured a decrease in pain perception in children.

Long-term outcomes of trapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction for trapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis

BackgroundTrapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis is a common condition for which the reference standard treatment after failure of non-operative measures is trapeziectomy. Several techniques have been devised to avoid proximal migration of the first metacarpal bone (M1) with impingement on the scaphoid bone. We have developed a Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction technique that avoids potential complications of tendon harvesting. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of this technique. HypothesisTrapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction is a reliable option for providing lasting pain relief in patients with trapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis. Materials and methodsWe conducted an observational, single-centre, single-surgeon, retrospective cohort study in consecutive patients managed by primary trapeziectomy. We excluded patients with revision trapeziectomy or less than 10 years’ follow-up. The primary outcome was event-free survival, defined as absence of revision surgery and of a numerical rating scale score for pain above 3/10. The secondary criteria were clinical tolerance of the Gore-Tex® implant and radiological changes. The patients were assessed at last follow-up either in person or during a teleconsultation. ResultsOf 78 included joints, 54 were assessed during patient visits and 24 by teleconsultation. At 10 years, the event-free survival rate was 91.3%, and 60.3% of patients were free of pain. Evidence of osteolysis was visible in 24% of patients. No patient experienced clinical intolerance of the Gore-Tex® implant. The mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 25.5. Metacarpo-phalangeal hyperextension was significantly increased, to 30.6°, and the mean trapezial space ratio was significantly decreased, to 39.1% of the baseline value. ConclusionLong-term event-free survival was high. Functional outcomes and pain were similar to previous reports. Trapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction obviates the need for tendon harvesting. Osteolysis developed in some patients but did not correlate with clinical intolerance. Long-term clinical and radiological monitoring is in order after Gore-Tex® implantation. Level of evidenceIV, Observational, single-centre, single-surgeon, retrospective cohort study.

Cannabinoid Effect and Safety in Spasticity Following Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.

BackgroundNabiximols is a cannabis-based drug to treat spasticity-associated symptoms currently approved for patients with multiple sclerosis only. Cannabinoids are useful in an increasing number of medical conditions but may bear an increased risk for cardiovascular events. SativexStroke is a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover monocentric clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nabiximols in patients with spasticity following stroke.MethodsPatients were treated with nabiximols oromucosal spray or placebo and assessed before and after two phases of 1-month duration each. Cardiovascular safety was assessed before and during the trial. Primary endpoints were changes in spasticity numeric rating scale scores and electromyographic recording of the stretch reflex in affected wrist flexors. Secondary outcome measures were numeric rating scale scores for pain, sleep and bladder function, the number of daily spasms and clinical assessment of spasticity with the modified Ashworth scale. The study was registered with the EudraCT number 2016-001034-10.ResultsBetween May 2, 2018, and February 20, 2020, 41 patients entered the study. Seven patients did not complete the study, so 34 were included in the analysis. Two serious adverse events occurred, but none related to cardiovascular function. Primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures did not change from baseline during nabiximols treatment relative to placebo.ConclusionThis study suggests that nabiximols use is probably safe in stroke patients, therefore cannabinoid usefulness may be further investigated. The lack of nabiximols effect could be related to low pain levels in recruited patients or different spasticity mechanisms between post-stroke and multiple sclerosis patients. Similarly, a beneficial effect of nabiximols could have emerged if more patients with a higher level of spasticity at baseline were recruited.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2016-001034-10/IT.

Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment

BackgroundTo compare the postoperative analgesic effect of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) versus inhalational anaesthesia (GAS) in patients using morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in a single tertiary university hospital. Adult patients who used PCA morphine after general anaesthesia across 15 types of surgeries were included. Patients who received propofol TIVA were compared to those who had inhalational anaesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption.ResultsData from 4202 patients were analysed. The overall adjusted NRS pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received propofol TIVA at rest (GEE: β estimate of the mean on a 0 to 10 scale = -0.56, 95% CI = (-0.74 to -0.38), p < 0.001; GAS as reference group) and with movement (β estimate = -0.89, 95% CI = (-1.1 to -0.69), p < 0.001) from postoperative days (POD) 1–3. Propofol TIVA was associated with lower overall adjusted postoperative morphine consumption (β estimate = -3.45, 95% CI = (-4.46 to -2.44), p < 0.001). Patients with propofol TIVA had lower adjusted NRS pain scores with movement for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p < 0.001) and urological surgeries (p = 0.005); and less adjusted postoperative morphine consumption for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.006) and urological surgeries (p = 0.002). There were no differences for other types of surgeries.ConclusionPropofol TIVA was associated with statistically significant, but small reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption in patients using PCA morphine. Subgroup analysis suggests clinically meaningful analgesia possibly for hepatobiliary/pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal surgeries.Trial registrationThis study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03875872).

Abstract No. : ABS1499: Role of platelet-rich-plasma versus dextrose-prolotherapy in the management of partial rotator cuff tear- A randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims:Regenerative medicines like Platelet-Rich plasma (PRP) and Dextrose-Prolotherapy (DP) are gaining popularity for treating partial Rotator Cuff tear (PTRCT). Thisstudy aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PRP versus DP for reducing pain and improving functional ability in patients with chronic PTRCT.Methods:One hundred and twenty patients of both sexes, aged 18-65 years, with PTRCT and having persisting pain >6 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), even after conservative treatment for at-least two months, were included in study. After assessment, 104 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group P (n=54) received PRP 2-3ml at 0 and 4weeks. Group D (n=50) received 2-3ml of 12.5% dextrose at 0, 3 and 6 weeks. Injections were given using ultrasound. Patients (n=92) were assessed with NRS score and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score before 1st injection,and at 8 weeks and 12 weeks after 1st injection. Friedman ANOVA test followed by Wilcoxon test was done for within group comparison whereas between group comparison were done by Mann Whitney U test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.Results:Significant reduction in NRS score and UCLA score were found in both the groups at 8 weeks and 12weeks after injection, compared to pre- injection scores (0week)(figure 1). No significant difference were found in between two groups at any point of time.Figure 1Mean numerical rating scale score for pain at different time points.Conclusion:Both PRP and DP are equally effective in reduction of pain and improvement in shoulder functional ability in patients with PTRCT for at least 12 weeks.

Ultrasound-Guided Comparison of Psoas Compartment Block and Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Pain Management in Pediatric Developmental Dysplasia of Hip Surgeries.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare psoas compartment block (PCB) and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SFIB) in terms of pain management and the need for additional systemic analgesia in the perioperative phase of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).Materials and MethodsSixty pediatric patients were randomized into the PCB group and the SFIB group. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were used to assess postoperative pain during the initial 24 h after extubation. Sufentanil consumption, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands, and complications were also recorded.ResultsThe NRS pain scores were significantly lower in the PCB group than in the SFIB group at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after extubation (all P < 0.01). Postoperatively, 13.8% of patients in the PCB cohort received additional administration of sufentanil, in contrast to 63.3% of the SFIB cohort (P < 0.01). In the PCB group, 0 (0-0) mcg/kg sufentanil was administered, while in the SFIB group 0.1 (0-0.2) mcg/kg (P < 0.01). In addition, the PCB group had fewer PCA demands than the SFIB group within the initial 24 h (P < 0.01). It took less operating time to achieve SFIB as compared to PCB (P < 0.01). No adverse events related to two techniques were recorded.ConclusionsPCB provided a better perioperative pain management in pediatric patients with the DDH surgeries compared to SFIB. It also reduced the need for supplementary systemic analgesia.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia plus psychoeducational intervention for acute postoperative pain in patients with pulmonary nodules after thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe association of psychological factors with postoperative pain has been well documented. The incorporation of psychoeducational intervention into a standard analgesia protocol seems to be an attractive approach for the management of acute postoperative pain. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of psychoeducational intervention on acute postoperative pain in pulmonary nodule (PN) patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery.MethodsIn this study, 76 PN patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) plus psychoeducational evaluation and intervention were selected as the psychoeducational intervention group (PG). Another 76 PN patients receiving IV-PCA without psychoeducational intervention after thoracoscopic surgery, treated as the control group (CG), were identified from the hospital database and matched pairwise with PG patients according to age, sex, preoperative body mass index (BMI), opioid medications used for IV-PCA and the educational attainment of patients.ResultsThe most common psychological disorders were anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity, which were recorded from 82.9% (63/76) and 63.2% (48/76) of PG patients. The numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores of the PG patients were significantly lower than those of the CG patients at 2 and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). Total opioid consumption for acute postoperative pain in the PG was 52.1 mg of morphine equivalent, which was significantly lower than that (67.8 mg) in the CG (P = 0.038). PG patients had a significantly lower incidence of rescue analgesia than CG patients (28.9% vs. 44.7%, P = 0.044). Nausea/vomiting was the most common side effect of opioid medications, recorded for 3 (3.9%) PG patients and 10 (13.2%) CG patients (P = 0.042). In addition, no significant difference was observed between PG and CG patients in terms of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications (10.5% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.240).ConclusionsPsychoeducational intervention for PN patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery resulted in reduced acute postoperative pain, less opioid consumption and fewer opioid-related side effects.

Fluoroscopy-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neurotomy of the Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joints: A Clinical Pilot Study.

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of a fluoroscopy-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound system for zygapophyseal joint denervation as a treatment for chronic low back pain.MethodsThe clinical pilot study was performed on 10 participants diagnosed with lumbar zygapophyseal joint syndrome. Each participant had a documented positive response to a diagnostic block or a previous, clinically beneficial radiofrequency ablation. For a descriptive study, the primary outcome was the safety question. All device- or procedure-related adverse events were collected. Secondary outcome variables included the average numeric rating scale for pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory, the Patient Global Impression of Change, the morphine equivalent dose, and the finding of the neurological examination.ResultsAll participants tolerated the procedure well with no significant device- or procedure-related adverse events; there was one episode of transient pain during the procedure. The average numeric rating scale score for pain decreased from 6.2 at baseline to 2.1 (n = 10) after 1 month, 4.9 (n = 9) after 3 months, 3.0 (n = 8) after 6 months, and 3.0 (n = 6) after 12 months. The ratio of participants who were considered a treatment success was 90% at 1 month, 50% at 3 months, 60% at 6 months, and 40% at 12 months.ConclusionsThe first clinical pilot study using a noninvasive, fluoroscopy-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound lumbar zygapophyseal neurotomy resulted in no significant device- or procedure-related adverse events and achieved clinical success comparable with that of routine radiofrequency ablation.

Self-reported pain scores as a predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic twin pregnancy: a retrospective study

BackgroundTo evaluate the self-reported pain scores as a predictor of preterm birth (PTB) in symptomatic twin pregnancy and to develop a nomogram for the prediction model.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 148 cases of symptomatic twin pregnancies before 34 weeks of gestation visited at Seoul national university hospital from 2013 to 2018. With other clinical factors, self-reported pain score was evaluated by the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores for pain intensity. By multivariate analyses and logistic regression, we developed a prediction model for PTB within 7 days. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, the curves were plotted to show the predictability of the PTB according to NRS pain score, while adjusting the other covariates.ResultsTwenty-three patients (15.5 %) delivered preterm within 7 days. By a logistic regression analysis, higher NRS pain score (OR 1.558, 95 % CI 1.093–2.221, P < 0.05), shorter cervical length (OR 3.164, 95 % CI 1.262–7.936, P < 0.05) and positive fibronectin results (OR 8.799, 95 % CI 1.101–70.330, P < 0.05) affect PTB within 7 days. Using the variables, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the prediction model was 0.917. In addition, we developed a nomogram for the prediction of PTB within 7 days.ConclusionsSelf-reported pain scores combined with cervical length and fetal fibronectin are useful in predicting impending PTB in symptomatic twin pregnancy.

Changes in levels of cartilage oligomeric proteinase and urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen in subjects with knee osteoarthritis after dextrose prolotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

ObjectiveTo assess the effects of dextrose prolotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis on the levels of serum cartilage oligomeric proteinase and urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen, and on the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index and numerical rating scale score for pain.MethodsA randomized controlled trial, in which participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups, receiving injections of either hyaluronic acid or dextrose prolotherapy. The hyaluronic acid group received 5 injections, 1 each on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and the dextrose prolotherapy group received 3 injections, 1 each on weeks 1, 5 and 9. Serum cartilage oligomeric proteinase, urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index score, and numerical rating scale score for pain were measured at baseline and 3 weeks after the last injection. Comparative analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon test within groups and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test between groups.ResultsA total of 47 participants (21 allocated to hyaluronic acid, 26 allocated to dextrose prolotherapy) completed the protocol. Both interventions resulted in significant improvements in numerical rating scale scores for pain, total Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index scores, and its subscales score. However, the dextrose prolotherapy outperformed hyaluronic acid in numerical rating scale score for pain and level of urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen, with score changes differences of 0.93 (p = 0.042) and 0.34 (p = 0.048), respectively. No significant changes in level of serum cartilage oligomeric proteinase were found in either group.ConclusionDextrose prolotherapy is an alternative injection therapy for knee osteoarthritis, which was found to be associated with a significant reduction in urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen compared with hyaluronic acid injection. Neither injection method resulted in reduced serum cartilage oligomeric proteinase.LAY ABSTRACTKnee osteoarthritis is a common musculoskeletal disorder, which is one of the most frequent causes of disability in elderly people. To improve patients’ quality of life, prolotherapy has been developed as a non-operative treatment option for osteoarthritis. This study compared the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy with that of standard therapy using hyaluronic acid injections. Both interventions were effective in terms of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score improvement and numerical rating scale score changes. Cartilage repair was assessed by measuring levels of specific biomarkers of cartilage breakdown: urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (uCTX-II) and serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP). Dextrose prolotherapy was more effective than hyaluronic acid in reducing these biomarkers and decreasing patients’ pain. Dextrose prolotherapy is therefore recommended for use in patients with knee osteoarthritis, since it gives better results, is cost beneficial, and is suitable for use in low-resource settings. Dextrose prolotherapy may help to repair cartilage in knee OA, as it reduces the uCTX-II level.