Rate Of Severe Maternal Morbidity Research Articles

Identifying systems factors contributing to adverse events in maternal care using incident reports

The maternal mortality rate in the US increased significantly from 20.1 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2019 to 32.9 in 2021. Black women have a higher rate of mortality and also experience higher rates of severe maternal morbidity, which are life-threating maternal health complications. However, maternal mortality and SMM are preventable with timely and responsive care, suggesting opportunities to intervene at the point of care. To examine processes contributing to adverse maternal outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in these outcomes, we analyzed 550 incident report (IRs) collected in the maternity units of a large academic hospital in 2019 and 2020. IRs were disaggregated by race/ethnicity and the IR narratives were coded using the systems factors from the SEIPS 2.0 model. Tasks (40%) and organization (30%) were most frequently reported SEIPS 2.0 categories. The majority of these incidents were the result of omissions (15%), staffing (9%), teamwork and coordination (7%), specimen labeling errors (7%), and hospital protocols (6%). These findings from this analysis can improve system safety and support the development of targeted efforts to improve health equity for women and birthing of people of color.

Factors Associated with Maternal Morbidity among Black Women in the United States.

Non-Hispanic Black people (NHBP) have a three-fold higher rate of maternal mortality compared to other racial groups. Racial disparities in maternal morbidity are well-described; however, there are substantial differences in cultural, economic, and social determinants of health among racial groups. We thus sought to study the at-risk, non-Hispanic Black population as its own cohort to identify factors most associated with severe maternal morbidity (SMM). This is a population-based retrospective case-control study of all live births in the United States between 2017 and 2019 using birth records obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. The primary outcome for this study was to determine demographic, social, medical, and obstetric factors associated with maternal morbidity among NHBP who did and did not experience an SMM event. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio between each individual factor and the outcome of SMM among NHBP. Of the 1,624,744 NHBP who delivered between 2017 and 2019, 1.1% experienced an SMM event defined as a composite of blood product transfusion, eclamptic seizure, intensive care unit admission, unplanned hysterectomy, and uterine rupture. The rates of these individual SMM events per 10,000 deliveries were 50, 40, 20, 5, and 4 among NHBP, respectively. Among NHBP, factors associated in multivariable regression analysis with SMM in order of strength of association included cesarean delivery, earlier gestational age at delivery, preeclampsia, induction of labor, chronic hypertension, prior preterm birth, lower educational attainment, multifetal gestation, advanced maternal age, pregestational diabetes, and cigarette smoking. The population attributable fraction for cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disease for the outcome of SMM were 0.46, 0.23, and 0.07, respectively. The three factors most associated with SMM among NHBP are potentially avoidable or modifiable by aggressive screening, prevention, and treatment of preeclampsia and preterm birth as well as reducing cesarean rates in this population. · The rate of SMM in NHBP may be modifiable.. · NHBP have a three-fold higher rate of maternal mortality.. · Preeclampsia, preterm birth, and cesarean sections are most associated with maternal morbidity..

Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health: Evolution of a program to address maternal morbidity and mortality

The Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health program is a national investment in promoting safe care for every birth in the United States and lowering rates of preventable maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity. Through its work with state and jurisdiction-based teams on patient safety bundle implementation, the program supports data-driven quality improvement. This paper details key aspects of the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health including patient safety bundles, technical assistance, implementation resource development, data support, and partnerships while providing an overview of the program's evolution, reach, impact, and future opportunities.

Delivery at an inadequate level of maternal care is associated with severe maternal morbidity

BackgroundImplementing levels of maternal care is one strategy proposed to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. The levels of maternal care framework outline individual medical and obstetric comorbidities, along with hospital resources required for individuals with these different comorbidities to deliver safely. The overall goal is to match individuals to hospitals, so all birthing people get appropriate resources and personnel during delivery to reduce maternal morbidity. ObjectivesThis study examined the association between delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care and the risk of experiencing severe maternal morbidity. Study designThe 40 birthing hospitals in Massachusetts were surveyed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Levels of Care Assessment Tool. We linked individual delivery hospitalizations from the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal data system to hospital-level data from the Levels of Care Assessment Tool surveys. Level of maternal care guidelines were used to outline 16 high-risk conditions warranting delivery at hospitals with resources beyond those considered basic (level I) obstetric care. We then used the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assessed levels to determine whether delivery occurred at a hospital that had the resources to meet an individual’s needs (i.e., if a patient received risk-inappropriate care).We conducted our analyses in two stages. First, multivariable logistic regression models predicted whether an individual delivered in a hospital that did not have the resources for their risk condition. The main explanatory variable of interest was whether the hospital self-assessed their level of maternal care to be higher than their Levels of Care Assessment Tool -assessment. We then used logistic regression to examine the association between delivery at an inappropriate level and the presence of severe maternal morbidity at delivery. ResultsAmong 64,441 deliveries in Massachusetts from January 1 to December 31, 2019, 33.2% (21,415/64,441) had one or more of the 16 high-risk conditions suggesting delivery should occur at a center designated as a level I or higher. Of the 21,415 individuals with a high-risk condition, 13% (2,793/21,415) or 4% (2,793/64,441) of the entire sample delivered at an inappropriate level of maternal care. Birthing individuals with high-risk conditions delivering at a hospital with an inappropriate level had elevated odds (aOR: 3.34, 95% CI: 2.24, 4.96) of experiencing severe maternal morbidity after adjusting for patient comorbidities, demographics, average hospital severe maternal morbidity rate, hospital level of maternal care, and geographic region. ConclusionsBirthing people who delivered in a hospital with risk-inappropriate resources were significantly more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity. Delivery in a hospital with a discrepancy in their self-assessment and Levels of Care Assessment Tool assessment significantly predicted delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care, suggesting inadequate knowledge of hospitals’ resources and capabilities. Our data demonstrate the potential for the levels of maternal care paradigm to decrease severe maternal morbidity while highlighting the need for robust implementation and education to ensure everyone receives risk-appropriate care.

Racial Disparity in Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Hypertensive Disorders in Washington State: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

To evaluate the relationship between hypertensive (HTN) disorders and severe maternal morbidity (SMM). To understand whether there is differential prevalence of HTN disorders by race and whether the relationship between HTN disorders and SMM is modified by race and ethnicity. We performed a retrospective cohort study using patient-level rates of SMM for pregnancies at all 61 non-military hospitals in Washington State from 10/2015 to 9/2016. Data were obtained from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the association of HTN disorders and SMM (with and without transfusion) overall and by race. The population-attributable fraction of HTN disorders on SMM within each racial/ethnic group was calculated. Of 76,965 deliveries, 864 (1.1%) had any SMM diagnosis or procedure. All racial and ethnic minorities, except white and Asian, were disproportionally affected by preeclampsia with severe features (SF) and SMM. Overall, and within each racial/ethnic group, the SMM rate was higher among pregnancies with any HTN disorder compared to no HTN disorder (2.8 vs. 0.9%, OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.7-3.6). Race and ethnicity significantly modified the association. Overall and within each racial/ethnic group, there was a dose-response relationship between the type of HTN disorder and SMM, with more severe HTN disorders leading to a greater risk of SMM. The population-attributable fraction of HTN disorders on SMM was 20.6% for Black individuals versus 17.5% overall. The findings were similar when reclassifying transfusion-only SMM as no SMM. In Washington, HTN disorders are associated with SMM in a dose-dependent fashion with the greatest impact among Black individuals.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Pregnancies with Substance Use Disorder: Impact on Perinatal Outcomes.

Objective: To examine racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) among pregnant patients with substance use disorder (SUD) compared to individuals without SUD. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of inpatient hospitalizations of pregnant people from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. ICD-10 codes were used to identify the frequency of SMM and/or APO between those with and without SUD by race/ethnicity. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the effect of race/ethnicity as an independent predictor and as an effect modifier of SMM and APO in patients with SUD. Results: From 2,508,259 hospitalizations, SUD was identified in 6.7% admissions with the highest rate in White patients (8.2%) followed by Black (7.7%) and Hispanic (2.2%) patients. Rate of SMM and APO were increased in patients with SUD in all racial/ethnic groups compared to those without SUD, increasing by 1% and 10%, respectively. Among all patients, Black race was an independent predictor of SMM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05-2.13) and APO (aOR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.56-1.59). Hispanic ethnicity was also an independent risk factor for predicting SMM (aOR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.37-1.43). Among Hispanic patients, SUD was associated with an ∼90% increased likelihood of SMM and APO. Conclusion: Although higher rates of SMM and APO are seen among hospitalizations of pregnant people with SUD, racial/ethnic disparities also exist among this population. This warrants further attention and presents an opportunity for intervention and for addressing the root causes of racial and ethnic disparities.

Obstetric Medicine: the protocol for a prospective three-dimensional cohort study to assess maternity care for women with pre-existing conditions (ForMaT).

Pregnancies in women with pre-existing medical conditions are on the rise. These pregnancies are characterized by an increased rate of maternal and perinatal complications, which can result in higher health care expenditures and altered pregnancy experiences. The purpose of this study is to integrally analyze maternity care for women with pre-existing conditions in the framework of a risk-adapted, interdisciplinary care by recording three substantial parts of maternity care: (1) maternal and perinatal outcome; (2) hospital costs and reimbursements covering the period from preconception counseling or initial antenatal visit to discharge after birth; and (3) women's experience of reproductive choice and becoming a mother in the presence of a pre-existing condition. In this observational, prospective, longitudinal, and monocentric cohort study, we aim to include a total of 1,500 women over a recruitment period of 15 months. Women registering for care at the Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany, are allocated to three groups based on their health and risk status: women with pre-existing conditions, as well as healthy women with obstetric risk factor and healthy women with a low-risk pregnancy. Participants are observed from time of initial consultation until discharge after birth. Analysis focuses on (1) maternal and perinatal outcome, especially rate of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity; (2) costs and reimbursements; and (3) surveys to capture of women's experience and health-related quality of life during the time of reproductive choice, pregnancy, and childbirth in the presence of pre-existing medical conditions. With its complex three-dimensional design, the ForMaT-Trial is aiming to provide a comprehensive analysis of pregnancy and childbirth in women with pre-existing conditions. The results may serve as a basis for counseling and care of these women. By analyzing costs of specialized care, data for discussing reimbursement are generated. Lastly, our results may increase awareness for the perception of reproductive choice, pregnancy and motherhood in this continuously rising population.Clinical trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00030061, October 28, 2022.

Risk Factors for Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Women Enrolled in Mississippi Medicaid

Mississippi has one of the highest rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in the US, and SMMs have been reported to be more frequent among Medicaid-insured women. A substantial proportion of pregnant women in Mississippi are covered by Medicaid; hence, there is a need to identify potential risk factors for SMM in this population. To examine the associations of health care access and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics with SMM events among Mississippi Medicaid-enrolled women who had a live birth. A nested case-control study was conducted using 2018 to 2021 Mississippi Medicaid administrative claims database. The study included Medicaid beneficiaries aged 12 to 55 years who had a live birth and were continuously enrolled throughout their pregnancy period and 12 months after delivery. Individuals in the case group had SMM events and were matched to controls on their delivery date using incidence density sampling. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2022. Risk factors examined in the study included sociodemographic factors (age and race), health care access (distance from delivery center, social vulnerability index, and level of maternity care), and clinical factors (maternal comorbidity index, first-trimester pregnancy-related visits, and postpartum care). The main outcome of the study was an SMM event. Adjusted odds ratio (aORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Among 13 485 Mississippi Medicaid-enrolled women (mean [SD] age, 25.0 [5.6] years; 8601 [63.8%] Black; 4419 [32.8%] White; 465 [3.4%] other race [American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, multiracial, and unknown]) who had a live birth, 410 (3.0%) were in the case group (mean [SD] age, 26.8 [6.4] years; 289 [70.5%] Black; 112 [27.3%] White; 9 [2.2%] other race) and 820 were in the matched control group (mean [SD] age, 24.9 [5.7] years; 518 [63.2%] Black; 282 [34.4%] White; 20 [2.4%] other race). Black individuals (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.93) and those with higher maternal comorbidity index (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40) had higher odds of experiencing SMM compared with White individuals and those with lower maternal comorbidity index, respectively. Likewise, an increase of 100 miles (160 km) in distance between beneficiaries' residence to the delivery center was associated with higher odds of experiencing SMM (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20). The study findings hold substantial implications for identifying high-risk individuals within Medicaid programs and call for the development of targeted multicomponent, multilevel interventions for improving maternal health outcomes in this highly vulnerable population.

A Retrospective Study in 12-Year cohort of 216 Parturients with Invasive Placentation in a Tertiary Care Centre in Oman: Clinical Outcomes Indicate Severe Maternal Morbidity

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) comprising placenta accreta, increta, and percreta, is 1 of the leading causes of peripartum hemorrhage and accounts for up to 50% of all cesarean hysterectomies (CH). We analyzed the data of 216 parturients with PAS who underwent cesarean delivery (CD) and/or CH. Intraoperative surgical complications were noted in 215 (99.5%). The mean estimated blood loss was 2743 (1790) mL, and 105 parturients (48.6%) lost ≥2500 mL. The patients experienced high rates of severe acute maternal morbidity [162 (75%)], hysterectomy [82 (38%)], large volume blood loss, blood transfusion, peripartum anemia, and prolonged hospital stay.

Global burden of potentially life-threatening maternal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPotentially life-threatening maternal conditions (PLTCs) is an important proxy indicator of maternal mortality and the quality of maternal health services. It is helpful to monitor the rates of severe maternal morbidity to evaluate the quality of maternal care, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. This study aims to systematically identify and synthesize available evidence on PLTCs.MethodsWe searched studies in English from 2009‒2023 in PubMed, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Gateway, the POPLINE database, and the Science Direct website. The study team independently reviewed the illegibility criteria of the articles. Two reviewers independently appraised the included articles using the Joanna Briggs Instrument for observational studies. Disputes between the reviewers were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was conducted in Stata version 16. The pooled proportion of PLTCs was calculated using the random effects model. The heterogeneity test was performed using the Cochrane Q test, and its level was determined using the I2 statistical result. Using Egger's test, the publication bias was assessed.ResultThirty-two cross-sectional, five case–control, and seven cohort studies published from 2009 to 2023 were included in the meta-analysis. The highest proportion of PLTC was 17.55% (95% CI: 15.51, 19.79) in Ethiopia, and the lowest was 0.83% (95% CI: 0.73, 0.95) in Iraq. The pooled proportion of PLTC was 6.98% (95% CI: 5.98–7.98). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence varied based on country income level: in low-income 13.44% (95% CI: 11.88–15.00) I2 = 89.90%, low-middle income 7.42% (95% CI: 5.99–8.86) I2 = 99.71%, upper-middle income 6.35% (95% CI: 4.21–8.50) I2 = 99.92%, and high-income 2.67% (95% CI: 2.34–2.99) I2 = 99.57%. Similarly, it varied based on the diagnosis criteria; WHO diagnosis criteria used 7.77% (95% CI: 6.10–9.44) I2 = 99.96% at P = 0.00, while the Centers for Disease Controls (CDC) diagnosis criteria used 2.19% (95% CI: 1.89–2.50) I2 = 99.41% at P = 0.00.ConclusionThe pooled prevalence of PLTC is high globally, predominantly in low-income countries. The large disparity of potentially life-threatening conditions among different areas needs targeted intervention, particularly for women residing in low-income countries. The WHO diagnosis criteria minimize the underreporting of severe maternal morbidity.Trial registrationCRD42023409229.

Severity of excessive gestational weight gain and risk of severe maternal morbidity

Both obesity and excessive gestational weight gain are associated with severe maternal morbidity, but there is limited literature evaluating whether the risk of severe maternal morbidity is further increased by the degree or severity of excessive gestational weight gain. This study aimed to determine whether pregnant patients with excessive gestational weight gain who gained more than 50 lb were at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with those who only moderately exceeded recommended gestational weight gain guidelines. A secondary objective was to determine whether patients who gained 10 lb more than the recommended upper limit of total weight gain for a given prepregnancy body mass index group were at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with those who exceeded that upper limit by a lesser amount. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with live, term, singleton deliveries with excessive gestational weight gain from 7 hospitals within a large health system in New York between January 2019 and February 2020. Excessive gestational weight gain was defined as exceeding the recommended upper limit of total weight gain for a given prepregnancy body mass index category using the National Academy of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines: >40 lb for a body mass index of <18.5 kg/m2, >35 lb for a body mass index of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, >25 lb for a body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, and >20 lb for a body mass index of ³30.0 kg/m2. Patient height and weight data were self-reported at the time of delivery hospitalization and retrieved from the electronic medical record system. Patients were classified into 2 excessive gestational weight gain groups: moderate (≤50 lb) or severe (>50 lb). Patients with missing body mass index or gestational weight gain were excluded. The primary exposure was severe excessive gestational weight gain. The primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity, defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of severe maternal morbidity, adjusting for race and ethnicity, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, gestational diabetes mellitus, and maternal mood disorder. For the secondary analysis, severe maternal morbidity rates were compared between patients who exceeded their body mass index-specific upper limit of total weight gain by ≥10 lb and those who exceeded it by <10 lb. A total of 11,506 patients were included for analysis, and 1965 patients (17.1%) had severe excessive gestational weight gain. The overall rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.3%. Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 85 of 1965 patients (4.3%) with severe excessive gestational weight gain and 292 of 9541 patients (3.1%) with moderate excessive gestational weight gain. On regression analysis, after adjustment for covariate factors, patients with a severe excessive gestational weight gain were 39% more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity than those with moderate excessive gestational weight gain (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.79). Patients with excessive gestational weight gain of ≥10 lb above the recommended body mass index-specific upper limit for gestational weight gain were 32% more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.62) to experience severe maternal morbidity than patients who exceeded that upper limit by <10 lb. Patients with live, term, singleton pregnancies who gain more than 50 lb are at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with those who only moderately exceed gestational weight gain guidelines. Similarly, patients who gain ≥10 lb above the recommended body mass index-specific upper limit for gestational weight gain are at increased risk. Further study is warranted to determine the most effective interventions to manage gestational weight gain and mitigate maternal risk.

Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection During Pregnancy.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, but the contribution to severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has been less frequently documented. We conducted a national cohort study of 93 624 deliveries occurring between 11 March 2020 and 1 July 2021 using medical claims information from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified from diagnostic and laboratory testing claims records. We identified 21 SMM conditions using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification and procedure codes and compared SMM conditions by SARS-CoV-2 status using Poisson regression with robust variance, adjusting for maternal sociodemographic and health factors, onset of labor, and week of conception. Approximately 5% of deliveries had a record of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 27.0% <7 days before delivery, 13.5% within 7-30 days of delivery, and 59.5% earlier in pregnancy. Compared to uninfected pregnancies, the adjusted risk of SMM was 2.22 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-2.48) among those infected <7 days before delivery and 1.66 times higher (95% CI, 1.23-2.08) among those infected 7-30 days before delivery. The highest risks were observed for acute respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 13.24 [95% CI, 12.86-13.61]) and acute renal failure (aRR, 3.91 [95% CI, 3.32-4.50]). COVID-19 is associated with increased rates of SMM.

Telehealth for Equitable Obstetric Care: Addressing Gaps for Patients, Providers, and Payers

In June 2022, President Biden and Vice President Harris released their blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, stating their “vision for the future is that the United States will be considered the best country in the world to have a baby.” Currently, it is one of the worst among industrialized countries despite the US spending nearly double the average amount on healthcare per capita. The US is amidst a maternal mortality crisis, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people, with more than 80% of the deaths preventable. Telehealth in obstetrics has the potential to reach pregnant people who are not currently being served by the medical system and to improve rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality; however, more research is needed to understand and monitor its equity, costs, and optimal usage. Extant research shows that telehealth can produce a small positive effect for certain obstetric health outcomes, but these research findings are rarely stratified by pregnant patients’ demographics. To prevent the perpetuation of existing health inequities, gaps in obstetric telehealth research will need to be addressed. Key knowledge gaps for researchers and policy makers include outcomes, access, satisfaction by patients and providers, potential time savings for patients, and health system cost savings. Im​plementation of equitable obstetric coverage of telehealth services requires clarity from private and public payers for inter-state provisions of care, liability and risk, and service and payment parity.Note: While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.

Abstract 13354: Higher Severe Maternal Morbidity Rates at Delivery Hospitalization Among Racial and Ethnic Groups Related to Chronic Hypertension and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) affects 0.5-3% of pregnancies in the United States, with risk varying for racial and ethnic groups. Studies have rarely evaluated how chronic hypertension (cHTN) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) affect differences in SMM risk. This study sought to evaluate cHTN and HDP as contributors to racial disparities in SMM rates. Retrospective cohort study of 263,518 patients aged 18-46 years who received prenatal care ≤14 weeks' gestation and delivered a stillborn or live singleton birth ≥20 weeks’ gestation at a Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospital (2009-2019). We evaluated the relation of cHTN and HDP [preeclampsia (PE), gestational hypertension (GH) and superimposed preeclampsia (s_PE)] to SMM at delivery hospitalization, defined as the presence of at least 1 of 21 conditions meeting CDC criteria. Modified Poisson regression models estimated the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of SMM associated with cHTN and HDP among self-reported racial and ethnic groups [Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander (NHPI), White] adjusted for covariables. There were 13,626 women (5.2%) with cHTN, in whom 4297 (31.5%) developed s_PE. For patients with no cHTN, 11,744 (4.7%) developed PE and 11,514 (4.6%) developed GH. The overall SMM rate (number of cases/10,000 births) was 219.7. SMM rates were higher for patients with cHTN vs no cHTN (417.6 vs. 208.9, p&lt;.0001), and for PE (934.3) and s_PE (898.3) vs no cHTN + no HDP (165.9), p&lt;0.001. SMM rates differed for racial and ethnic groups. Compared to White patients with No cHTN or HDP, aRRs of SMM associated with PE and s_PE increased in order for White, Asian, Hispanic, Black, and NHPI groups (Table 1). Preeclampsia was 6 times more prevalent among those with cHTN than no cHTN. Preeclampsia was strongly associated with higher SMM rates in both women with cHTN and without cHTN, especially among NHPI and Black groups. Preeclampsia may contribute substantially to racial disparities in SMM.

The racial disparity of severe maternal morbidity across weeks of gestation: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 National Inpatient Sample

Severe maternal morbidity is increasing in the United States. Black women experience the highest rates of severe maternal morbidity and also of preterm births, which are associated with severe maternal morbidity. The racial disparity of severe maternal morbidity across weeks of gestation has not been well-studied. This study aimed to evaluate differences in severe maternal morbidity between Black and White birthing people by week of gestation. Differences may indicate periods of pregnancy when Black women are particularly vulnerable to severe maternal morbidity and may require additional interventions. This was a cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2019. We used International Classification of Diseases codes from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines to identify severe maternal morbidity from delivery hospitalizations. We examined the rates of severe maternal morbidity in Black vs White women by week of gestation to evaluate periods of pregnancy when Black women experience additional risks of severe maternal morbidity while adjusting for age, region, medical comorbidities, and Medicaid enrollment. Severe maternal morbidity was analyzed while both including and excluding cases for which blood transfusion was the only indicator of severe maternal morbidity. Overall, Black birthing people had twice the rate of severe maternal morbidity births compared with White birthing people (2.7% vs 1.3%; P<.0001) and were more likely to deliver preterm (14.7% vs 9.4%; P<.0001). The racial disparity of severe maternal morbidity was present throughout all weeks of gestation, with the largest gap observed at extremely and moderately preterm gestations (22-33 weeks). Rates of severe maternal morbidity for Black women peaked at 22 to 33 weeks' gestation and were lowest at term (≥37 weeks). Black women had a greater proportion of severe maternal morbidity cases due to blood transfusion (68.3% vs 64.5%; P<.01) and acute renal failure (11.1% vs 8.5%; P<.001). Black women experience a substantially higher rate of severe maternal morbidity at preterm gestations (22-36 weeks) in addition to higher rates of preterm delivery. Even when accounting for age, medical comorbidities, and social determinants, Black birthing people have higher odds of severe maternal morbidity throughout pregnancy.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with hepatitis C and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: The sum of the parts.

Hepatitis C virus and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) are well-known independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in pregnancy. In addition, it is well-established that there is an association between Hepatitis C and ICP. This study's objective was to describe the impact of having both Hepatitis C and ICP on maternal and obstetric outcomes compared to patients having either Hepatitis C or ICP. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Nationwide Readmissions Database, an all-payor sample of discharges from approximately 60% of US hospitalizations. Deliveries at 24-42+ weeks between 10/2015 and 12/2020 were included. Diagnosis of Hepatitis C and ICP, and outcomes related to severe maternal morbidity were identified using International Classification of Disease-10 codes. Patients were categorized based on Hepatitis C and ICP status. Weighted logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between Hepatitis C and ICP status and outcomes, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. The primary outcome was any severe maternal morbidity; secondary outcomes included acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, sepsis, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and hospital length of stay. We modeled interaction terms between ICP and Hepatitis C to assess whether there was a greater or lesser effect from having both conditions on outcomes than we would expect from additive combination of the individual components (i.e., synergy or antagonism). A total of 10,040,850 deliveries between 24-42+ weeks were identified. Of these, 45,368 had Hepatitis C only; 84,582 had ICP only; and 1,967 had both Hepatitis C and ICP. Patients with both Hepatitis C and ICP had 1.5-fold higher odds of developing severe maternal morbidity compared to having neither. There was an also an increased odds of severe maternal morbidity in patients with both Hepatitis C and ICP compared to patients with only Hepatitis C or ICP. Having both was also associated with higher odds of preterm birth and length of stay compared to having only Hepatitis C, only ICP, or neither (preterm birth: aOR 5.09, 95% CI 4.87-5.33 vs. neither; length of stay: 46% mean increase, 95% CI 35-58% vs. neither). Associations were additive-no significant interactions between hepatitis C and cholestasis were found on rates of severe maternal morbidity, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, sepsis, cesarean section, or preterm birth (all p>0.05), and was minimal for gestational diabetes and length of stay. Hepatitis C and ICP are independent, additive risk factors for adverse maternal and obstetric outcomes. Despite physiologic plausibility, no evidence of a synergistic effect of these two diagnoses on outcomes was noted. These data may be useful in counseling patients regarding their increased risk of adverse outcomes when ICP presents in association with Hepatitis C versus ICP alone.

Association of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the Affordable Care Act on severe maternal morbidity

ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize the association between Mental Health Parity and the Affordable Care Act and rates of severe maternal morbidity among a population of commercially insured individuals, including individuals with and without perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. MethodsWe conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis of individuals with an inpatient delivery in Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database from 2008 to 2021. We applied an interrupted time series model with autoregressive integrated moving average to evaluate changes in quarterly severe maternal morbidity rates. ResultsAdjusted severe maternal morbidity rates declined from 167.2 (95%CI: [152.6, 181.9]) per 10,000 deliveries in the first quarter of 2008 to 98.2 (95%CI: [83.5, 112.8]) per 10,000 deliveries in the last quarter of 2021. Severe maternal morbidity rates remained higher, but declined to a greater degree, among those with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (435.6, 95%CI: [379.9, 491.3], to 165.0, 95%CI: [109.3, 220.8] per 10,000 deliveries) compared to those without (153.0, 95%CI: [140.7, 165.3] to 81.8, 95%CI: [69.6, 94.1] per 10,000 deliveries). ConclusionThe observed association suggests implementation of Mental Health Parity and Affordable Care Act may have played a role in lowering rates of severe maternal morbidity, particularly among individuals with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders.

Severe maternal morbidity surveillance, temporal trends and regional variation: A population-based cohort study.

To quantify temporal trends and regional variation in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in Sweden. Cohort study. Live birth and stillbirth deliveries in Sweden, 1999-2019. Types and subtypes of SMM were identified, based on a standard list (modified for Swedish clinical setting after considering the frequency and validity of each indicator) using diagnoses and procedure codes, among all deliveries at ≥22 weeks of gestation (including complications within 42 days of delivery). Contrasts between regions were quantified using rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Temporal changes in SMM types and subtypes were described. Types and subtypes of SMM. There were 59 789 SMM cases among 2 212 576 deliveries, corresponding to 270.2 (95% CI 268.1-272.4) per 10 000 deliveries. Composite SMM rates increased from 236.6 per 10 000 deliveries in 1999 to 307.3 per 10 000 deliveries in 2006, before declining to 253.8 per 10 000 deliveries in 2019. Changes in composite SMM corresponded with temporal changes in severe haemorrhage rates, which increased from 94.9 per 10 000 deliveries in 1999 to 169.3 per 10 000 deliveries in 2006, before declining to 111.2 per 10 000 deliveries in 2019. Severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count) syndrome (103.8 per 10 000 deliveries), severe haemorrhage (133.7 per 10 000 deliveries), sepsis, embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation, shock and severe mental health disorders were the most common SMM types. Rates of embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation and shock, acute renal failure, cardiac complications, sepsis and assisted ventilation increased, whereas rates of surgical complications, severe uterine rupture and anaesthesia complications declined. The observed spatiotemporal variations in composite SMM and SMM types provide substantive insights and highlight regional priorities for improving maternal health.

Maternal and Pregnancy Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation in the United States

BackgroundImproved survival following heart transplantation (HT) has led to more recipients contemplating pregnancy, but data on outcomes are limited. ObjectivesThe authors used a national data set to investigate and describe outcomes of pregnancies and deliveries in the United States in HT recipients. MethodsDiagnosis and procedure codes from the 2010-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database identified delivery hospitalizations, history of HT, comorbid conditions, and outcomes. The authors compared rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM), nontransfusion SMM, cardiovascular SMM (cSMM), and preterm birth from delivery hospitalization between HT recipients and no-HT recipients. The authors evaluated readmission to 330 days postpartum. Logistic and proportional hazard regressions were performed, adjusting for age, socioeconomic and facility characteristics, and clinical comorbidities. ResultsAmong 19,399,521 deliveries, 105 were HT recipients. Compared with no-HT, HT recipients were at higher risk for all SMM (24.8% vs 1.7%), nontransfusion SMM (20.8% vs 0.7%), cSMM (7.3% vs 0.12%), and preterm birth (43.3% vs 8.2%), all P < 0.001. In adjusted analyses, HT recipients had 16-fold greater odds of SMM, 28-fold greater odds of nontransfusion SMM, 38-fold greater odds of cSMM, and 7-fold greater odds of preterm birth. HT recipients had higher morbidity rates during delivery hospitalization and higher readmission rates within 1 year following delivery (26.9% vs 3.8%; adjusted HR: 6.03 [95% CI: 3.73-9.75]). ConclusionsDelivery with history of HT is associated with significantly increased rates of SMM, preterm birth, and hospital readmission. These results provide data regarding pregnancy outcomes for use when counseling patients with HT history who are considering pregnancy or who are pregnant.

Environmental crisis or an act of contemporary racism? A flint effect on maternal health disparities

Background Racial injustices, both within the social and environmental aspect, are increasingly in national discussions due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic and persistent violence perpetrated by police against Black civilians that resulted in tragic deaths. An ongoing environmental injustice that began in 2014 is the Flint Water Crisis (FWC). The purpose of this study is to conduct a quasi-experimental research design to compare Flint to a sociodemographically similar city to determine what effect, if any, the FWC had on maternal health from 2012 to 2017 across three time periods: pre-during-and-post-FWC. Methods The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s 21 severe maternal morbidity (SMM) rates severed as indicators of maternal health status and were collected from the Michigan Inpatient Database. Differences between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White race codes determined the maternal health disparity gap. R-statistical software and k-mean analysis were used to analyze cities that were comparable to Flint. Difference-in-difference methodology was used to compare the difference in SMM rates for Flint and a sociodemographically comparable city. Results On average, non-Hispanic Black women had a higher odds of experiencing a SMM across all three time periods: pre-FWC = 1.29, during-FWC = 1.2, and post-FWC = 1.05. Conclusions Maternal health outcomes observed in Flint during the FWC are significantly influenced by race. The study showed that regardless of a woman giving birth in a predominantly Black city, an environmental hazard, and her age range, maternal health disparities are still present if that woman identifies as Black.