Rate Of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Research Articles

Rituximab carries high risks of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hematologic and rheumatic patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis B.

Rituximab therapy is associated with a high risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We aimed to assess whether the risk of reactivation differed among various underlying diseases and between hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers and patients with resolved HBV infection. We retrospectively analyzed patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection who received rituximab without prophylactic anti-HBV therapy at a tertiary medical center. The risks of HBV reactivation, hepatitis, and hepatic decompensation were compared between the patients with hematologic and rheumatic diseases. There were 78 patients with hematologic diseases and 39 patients with rheumatic diseases included. Among them, 43 (59%) HBsAg-positive patients and 24 (55%) patients with resolved HBV infection experienced HBV reactivation at a median of 14.6months after rituximab therapy. After rituximab treatment, the 1-year HBV reactivation rate among patients with hematologic and rheumatic diseases was 29% and 45% in HBsAg-positive patients, respectively, while the rates were 38% and 17% in patients with resolved HBV infection. The reactivation risk continued to increase even 2years after rituximab therapy and was comparable between hematologic and rheumatic patients. A higher baseline HBV DNA level (≥20IU/mL vs <20IU/mL) was an independent predictor for HBV reactivation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 10.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-107) and HBV-associated hepatitis (aHR: 14.8, 95% CI: 1.4-158). Rituximab therapy is associated with a 50-64% risk of HBV reactivation regardless of underlying diseases and HBsAg status. HBV DNA levels should be assessed before initiating rituximab.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a critical concern for patients with a diagnosis of cancer receiving chemotherapy worldwide. Our aim was to assess the rate of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy globally. MethodsWe systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation studies from inception until July 2023. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled reactivation rate. Results86 studies involving 21,297 patients were included, comprising 62 and 24 studies from Eastern and Western regions. Pooled results indicated a 9% reactivation rate (95%CI: 7%–13%, I2=95%). Reactivation rates were 10% (95%CI: 7%–14%, I2=92%) for hematological malignancies and 5% (95%CI: 3%–9%, I2=94%) for solid tumors. Presence of HBV DNA, HBeAg, and HBsAg were correlated with reactivation rates of 29% (95%CI: 10%–60%, I2=91%), 23% (95%CI: 14%–36%, I2=78%), and 15% (95%CI: 11%–20%, I2=90%), respectively. For patients with positive anti-HBe Ab, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs Ab serology, pooled reactivation rates were 7% (95%CI: 3%–14%, I2=81%), 4% (95%CI: 3%–7%, I2=85%), and 3% (95%CI: 2%–6%, I2=80%), respectively. With antiviral prophylaxis, reactivation rates were 1% (95%CI: 0%–17%, I2=59%), 1% (95%CI: 0%–5%, I2=0%), 4% (95%CI: 2%–9%, I2=85%), and 6% (95%CI: 3%–12%, I2=32%) for patients receiving tenofovir, entecavir, lamivudine, and telbivudine, respectively. ConclusionPatients with a diagnosis of cancer undergoing chemotherapy face increased risk of HBV reactivation. This analysis raises public awareness and serves as a resource for future clinical trials.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Infections in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Patients with cancer with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are excluded from many cancer clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, data are limited regarding the management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer treated with ICIs. To address this gap, we reviewed the literature on management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer receiving ICIs. We searched MEDLINE and PubMed for all original research articles, case reports, and systematic reviews published in English between Jul 2013 and Jul 2023 on patients with cancer with HBV or HCV infection receiving ICIs. We found 28 studies (three prospective clinical trials, seven retrospective cohort studies, nine retrospective case series, and nine case reports) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HBV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HBV reactivation was 1.4% (38/2799), and no HBV-related deaths were reported. The frequency of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic and past HBV infections was 2% (35/1667) and 0.3% (3/1132), respectively. The risk of HBV reactivation was significantly higher among patients with chronic HBV infection not receiving antiviral prophylaxis than among those receiving antivirals (17% vs 1%, p < 0.05). Based on high-quality evidence, for patients with chronic HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended before ICI therapy initiation. For patients with past HBV infection, monitoring and on-demand antiviral treatment are sufficient. We found 11 studies (five clinical trials, five retrospective studies, and one prospective observational study) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HCV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HCV reactivation was 0.5% (2/387), and no HCV-related deaths were reported. HCV reactivation occurs primarily in patients receiving immunosuppressants for ICI-related toxic effects. ICIs are safe for HCV-infected patients with solid tumors. Chronic HBV or HCV infection should not be considered a contraindication for ICI therapy. Specific risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies are necessary to reduce the risk of ICI-related liver injury in patients with cancer and chronic HBV or HCV infection.

Abstract CT211: Safety of prompt initiation of durvalumab or STRIDE (single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab) regimen as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment for patients with chronic active hepatitis B

Abstract Background: Chronic hepatitis B is an etiology of HCC. Clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as HCC treatment typically exclude patients with chronic active hepatitis B (serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] viral load &amp;gt; 2000 IU/mL) or require the HBV viral load to be below a certain level using anti-HBV medications. In the phase 3 HIMALAYA study, the STRIDE regimen was superior to sorafenib and durvalumab was noninferior to sorafenib in overall survival benefits. This study explored the safety of concurrent administration of STRIDE or durvalumab with anti-HBV mediations for patients with chronic, active hepatitis B infection. Methods: We enrolled patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A liver function reserve, and chronic active hepatitis B not under anti-HBV treatment. Initially, only patients naïve to ICIs were eligible, and patients received durvalumab 1500mg iv every 4 weeks until disease progression, occurrence of unacceptable toxicities, or the maximum treatment duration of 2 years. After the positive results of the HIMALAYA study, we added tremelimumab 300mg iv on D1 following the STRIDE regimen and allowed enrollment of patients who had received prior programmed cell death-1 blockade therapy. Patients initiated entecavir as HBV treatment within 7 days of starting ICI therapy. The plan was to enroll 30 patients, with the primary outcome of HBV reactivation (a ≥2 log increase in serum HBV DNA compared to the baseline level). Results: The study is still ongoing and as of 31 Aug 2023, 19 patients were enrolled. Two patients were female, and the median age was 65.5 years. Ten patients received durvalumab alone, and 9 received the STRIDE regimen. The ALBI grade was 1 and 2 in 3 (16%) and 16 (84%) patients, respectively. Macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread were present in 11 (58%) and 11 (58%) patients, respectively; 12 (63%) patients had alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400 ng/mL. Eleven (58%) patients had received prior systemic therapy for HCC, such as sorafenib (n = 9), lenvatinib (n = 5), and regorafenib (n = 4). The mean±standard deviation baseline HBV viral load was 1.18±0.44 mIU/mL. With the median follow-up on 6.1 months, no patients experienced HBV reactivation or HBV-associated hepatitis. Hepatitis flare (ALT increase to ≥3 times the baseline level) was noted in 4 (21%) patients, but none were considered HBV-associated. The best objective tumor response was complete and partial response in 0 and 5 (26.3%) patients, respectively, and the disease control rate was 63.2%. Conclusion: In the preliminary results, simultaneous initiation of immunotherapy and anti-HBV medications in patients with HCC and chronic active hepatitis B did not increase HBV reactivation rate. This study was supported by AstraZeneca (NCT04294498). Citation Format: Yu-Yun Shao, Ching-Tso Chen, Tsung-Che Wu, Tsung-Hao Liu, Chien-Huai Chuang, Ann-Lii Cheng, Chih-Hung Hsu. Safety of prompt initiation of durvalumab or STRIDE (single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab) regimen as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment for patients with chronic active hepatitis B [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT211.

Prevention of hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hematologic malignancies treated with novel systemic therapies: Who and Why?

The risk of reactivation in patients with chronic or past/resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection receiving chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs is a well-known possibility. The indication of antiviral prophylaxis with nucleo(t)side analogue is given according to the risk of HBV reactivation of the prescribed therapy. Though the advent of new drugs is occurring in all the field of medicine, in the setting of hematologic malignancies the last few years have been characterized by several drug classes and innovative cellular treatment. As novel therapies, there are few data about the rate of HBV reactivation and the decision of starting or not an antiviral prophylaxis could be challenging. Moreover, patients are often treated with a combination of different drugs, so evaluating the actual role of these new therapies in increasing the risk of HBV reactivation is difficult. First results are now available, but further studies are still needed. Patients with chronic HBV infection [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive] are reasonably all treated. Past/resolved HBV patients (HBsAg negative) are the actual area of uncertainty where it could be difficult choosing between prophylaxis and pre-emptive strategy.

5-FU promotes HBV replication through oxidative stress-induced autophagy dysfunction

Background & aimsHepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a major problem that must be overcome during chemotherapy for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the mechanism underlying chemotherapy-associated HBV reactivation is still not fully understood, hindering the development of improved HBV-related HCC treatments. MethodsA meta-analysis was performed to assess the HBV reactivation risk during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). To investigate the regulatory effects and mechanisms of 5-FU on HBV replication, an HBV mouse model was established by pAAV-HBV1.2 hydrodynamic injection followed by intraperitoneal 5-FU injection, and different in vitro models (HepG2.2.15 or Huh7 cells) were established. Realtime RT‒qPCR, western blotting, luciferase assays, and immunofluorescence were used to determine viral parameters. We also explored the underlying mechanisms by RNA-seq, oxidative stress evaluation and autophagy assessment. ResultsThe pooled estimated rate of HBV reactivation in patients receiving TACE was 30.3 % (95 % CI, 23.1%–37.4 %). 5-FU, which is a chemotherapeutic agent commonly used in TACE, promoted HBV replication in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, 5-FU treatment obviously increased autophagosome formation, as shown by increased LC3-II levels. Additionally, 5-FU impaired autophagic degradation, as shown by marked p62 and mCherry-GFP-LC3 upregulation, ultimately promoting HBV replication and secretion. Autophagy inhibition by 3-methyladenine or chloroquine significantly altered 5-FU-induced HBV replication. Furthermore, 5-FU-induced autophagy and HBV replication were markedly attenuated with a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger. ConclusionsTogether, our results indicate that ROS-induced autophagosome formation and autophagic degradation play a critical role in 5-FU-induced HBV reactivation.

Impact of Mogamulizumab-Containing Chemotherapy on HBV Reactivation in Patients with T-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study (PROACTIVE-MOGA)

INTRODUCTION Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a potentially lethal complication, but may be preventable in patients with chronic HBV infection or resolved HBV infection who receive systemic chemotherapy.The risk of HBV reactivation (HBVR) depends on not only HBV infectious status but also type of systemic chemotherapy. An anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab (Moga), has been developed for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Moga is known to suppress CCR4-positive regulatory T cells and helper T cells, which can lead to immunological dysfunction. However, there is little evidence regarding the risk of HBVR in patients with chronic HBV infection or resolved HBV infection who receive Moga-containing systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the risk of HBVR and clinical outcome in those patients. METHODS &amp; MATERIALS: Patients treated with Moga-containing chemotherapy for T-cell lymphoma between May 2012 and March 2021, who were chronic HBV infection (defined as seropositive for HBsAg) or resolved HBV infection (defined as seronegative for HBsAg, but seropositive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs), were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of HBVR; HBVR in HBsAg-positive patients was defined as any of the following three criteria: 1) 2 log or more increase in HBV DNA from baseline, 2) 3.0 Log IU/ml or more of HBV DNA in patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline, 3) 4.0 Log IU/ml or more of HBV DNA in patients not available for HBV DNA at baseline. HBVR in HBsAg-negative patients was defined as any of following three criteria: 1) detectable for HBV DNA in patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline, 2) 1.3 Log IU/mL or more of HBV DNA in patients not available for HBV DNA at baseline, 3) seroconversion of HBsAg. RESULTS: A total of 23 HBsAg-positive patients and 246 resolved HBV-infected patients were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 23 HBsAg-positive patients, the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 63-73) and 19 patients (82%) had adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL). Baseline HBV DNA was undetectable level, detectable not quantifiable, and detectable in 9 (39%), 2 (9%), and 12 (52%) patients, respectively. All 23 HBsAg-positive patients received anti-HBV prophylaxis prior to Moga treatment. One of 23 (4.3%) patients experienced HBVR who led to HBV-related hepatitis. Among the 241 patients with resolved HBV infection, the median age was 65 years (IQR, 63-73) and 223 patients (91%) had ATL. Baseline serostatus of anti-HBc and anti-HBs were as follows: anti-HBc positive and anti-HBs positive in 177 patients (72%), anti-HBc-positive but anti-HBs negative in 50 (20%), the remaining 9 were anti-HBc negative but anti-HBs positive. Baseline HBV DNA was undetectable in 233 (95%), detectable not quantifiable in 5 (2%), and the remaining 3 were detectable for HBV DNA. Only 3 patients received anti-HBV prophylaxis. HBVR occurred in 11 patients, and the 2-year cumulative HBVR rate was 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6-16.5). Among the 11 patients with HBVR, the median peak HBV DNA level was 2.1 Log IU/mL (IQR, 1.7-5.0), the median time from first dose of Moga to HBVR was 140 days (IQR, 82-765) and 2 had HBV-related hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that the risk of HBVR was 4.3% (1 of 23) among HBsAg-positive patients with antiviral prophylaxis and 4.6% (11 of 238) among resolved HBV-infected patients without antiviral prophylaxis following Moga-containing chemotherapy. Anti-HBV prophylaxis and HBV DNA monitoring guided preemptive anti-HBV therapy are recommended to prevent HBV-related hepatitis for HBsAg-positive and resolve HBV-infected patients, respectively.

HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation when treated with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study aims to investigate the risk in this population. From January 2004 through December 2020, 1068 RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARDs therapy and 416 patients with HBsAg-/HBcAb+ were enrolled. Factors associated with HBV reactivation were analysed. During 2845 person-years of follow-up, 27 of 416 (6.5%,9.5 per 1000 person-years) patients developed HBV reactivation, with a cumulative rate of HBV reactivation of 3.5% at 5 years, 6.1% at 10 years and 24.2% at 17 years. The median interval from beginning b/tsDMARDs to HBV reactivation was 85 months (range: 9-186 months). The risk of HBV reactivation varied by type of b/tsDMARD, with rituximab having the highest risk (incidence rate: 48.3 per 1000 person-years), followed by abatacept (incidence rate: 24.0 per 1000 person-years). In multivariate analysis, rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 15.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.12-60.32, p = .001), abatacept (aHR: 9.30, 1.83-47.19, p = .007), adalimumab (aHR: 3.86, 1.05-14.26, p = .04) and negative baseline HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs, <10 mIU/mL) (aHR: 3.89, 1.70-8.92, p < .001) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients are susceptible to HBV reactivation during b/tsDMARD therapy. Those with negative baseline anti-HBs and those on certain b/tsDMARDs, such as rituximab, abatacept and adalimumab, have high reactivation risks. Risk stratification and management should be based on the patient's baseline anti-HBs titre and type of therapy.

Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0-17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8-18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3-35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0-9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0-15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8-14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.

Epstein-Barr virus reactivation correlates with worse outcomes for patients exposed to hepatitis B virus after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)has a high, chronic infection rate in Asian populations, but only few studies have analyzed the effect of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients exposed to HBV after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of these patients. We conducted a retrospective research including 61 patients exposed to HBV after undergoing haplo-HSCT. The patients were classified into two groups: the CMV reactivation group and no CMV reactivation group. The results were compared between the two groups using the K-W test for continuous variables, Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS), and a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze multivariable influences. The 3-year cumulative HBV reactivation rate was 8.2%. The median duration of HBV reactivation was 16months (16-22months) after haplo-HSCT. The CMV reactivation group had a higher cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation than the group without CMV reactivation. The EBV reactivation was substantially higher in the CMV reactivation group compared to that in the no CMV reactivation group (37.0% vs.5.9% respectively; P = 0.002). Furthermore, EBV reactivation was a risk factor for 1-year LFS and 1-year OS. Based on our data, EBV reactivation was related to worse outcomes in patients exposed to HBV after haplo-HSCT, whereas CMV reactivation was not.

Outcome of direct-acting antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus coinfection

BackgroundOral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have greatly improved treatment efficacy, with sustained virological response (SVR) rates of > 95% for HCV monoinfected patients. However, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/HCV coinfection is more complex than monoinfection with HBV or HCV alone. We evaluated the SVR rate at 12 weeks post-treatment with DAAs in patients with HCV/HBV and evaluated the rate of HBV reactivation during and 6 months after treatment.ResultsAmong the included patients, 191 (95.5%) achieved SVR. Older age, low platelet count, high serum creatinine, and higher liver stiffness value measured by fibroscan were predictors of failure to achieve SVR. The 16 patients (8%) with HBV reactivation patients had significantly higher ALT and serum creatinine and a high HCV RNA viral load at baseline compared with that of those without HBV reactivation.ConclusionPatients who received DAAs to treat HCV/HBV coinfection showed a high SVR. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risk for HBV reactivation during and after treatment with DAAs.

The growing burden of generalized myasthenia gravis: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.

The prevalence of myasthenia gravis is increasing in many countries, including Asia. As treatment options expand, population-based information about the disease burden can inform health technology assessments. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Healthcare Insurance Research database and Death Registry to describe the epidemiology, disease burden and treatment patterns of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) from 2009 to 2019. Episodes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or reactivation were explored. The number of patients with gMG increased from 1,576 in 2009 to 2,638 in 2019 and the mean (standard deviation) age from 51.63 (17.32) to 55.38 (16.29) years. The female:male ratio was 1.3:1. Frequently reported co-morbidities were hypertension (32-34% of patients), diabetes mellitus (16-21%) and malignancies (12-17%). The prevalence of patients with gMG increased annually from 6.83/100,000 population in 2009 to 11.18/100,000 population in 2019 (p < 0.0001). There was no temporal trend in all-cause fatality rates (range 2.76-3.79/100 patients annually) or gMG incidence rates (2.4-3.17/100,000 population annually). First-line treatment was with pyridostigmine (82%), steroids (58%), and azathioprine (11%). There was minimal change in treatment patterns over time. Among 147 new HBV infections, 32 (22%) received ≥4 weeks of antiviral therapy suggesting chronic infection. The HBV reactivation rate was 7.2%. The epidemiology of gMG in Taiwan is evolving rapidly, with higher prevalence rates and increasing involvement of older age-groups suggesting a growing burden of disease and associated healthcare costs. HBV infection or reactivation may pose a previously unrecognized recognized risk for patients with gMG receiving immunosuppressants.

#5721 HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS TREATED WITH BELATACEPT

Abstract Background and Aims Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients may be associated with liver failure and graft loss, especially in anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, has been used in kidney transplantation for some time and has been associated with reactivation of other viruses as BK or CMV. However, there are few data on HBV reactivation among kidney recipients treated with belatacept. Method We performed a retrospective study in two French kidney transplantation centres including all transplant recipients receiving belatacept. Among HBcAb-positive patients, we analyzed HBV reactivation rate, outcomes and risks factors. Results 135 patients treated with belatacept were included, and 32 were HBcAb-positive. Seven patients reactivated HBV (21.9% of HBcAb-positive patients), including 5 HBsAg-negative patients (16.7%); reactivation occurred 54.8 (± 70.9) months after transplantation. There was no significant difference in survival between patients that reactivated HBV and patients that did not: 5-year patient survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 83.4% (67.6; 100), respectively (p = 0.363) and 5-year graft survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 79.8% (61.7; 100), respectively (p = 0.335). No factor, including HBsAb positivity and antiviral prophylaxis, was statistically associated with the risk of HBV reactivation. Conclusion Compared to the few studies that exist in this area, the HBV reactivation rate was high in patients treated with belatacept in our study. Our findings suggest that systematic antiviral prophylaxis for anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients should be considered and that there should be close monitoring of HBV serology and viral load in these patients to detect early HBV reactivation.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients has been reported in 3% to 9% of anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients. It has not been studied in patients receiving belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker. We performed a retrospective study of all transplant recipients receiving belatacept in 2 kidney transplantation centers in France. Among HBcAb-positive patients, we analyzed HBV reactivation rate, outcomes, and risk factors. A total of 135 patients treated with belatacept were included: 32 were HBcAb-positive and 2 were HBsAg-positive. Seven patients reactivated HBV (21.9% of HBcAb-positive patients), including 5 HBsAg-negative patients (16.7% of HBcAb-positive HBsAg-negative patients). Reactivation occurred 54.8 (± 70.9) months after transplantation. One patient presented with severe hepatitis and 1 patient developed cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in survival between patients that reactivated HBV and patients that did not: 5-year patient survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 83.4% (67.6; 100), respectively (P= 0.363); and 5-year graft survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 79.8% (61.7; 100), respectively (P= 0.335). No factor, including HBsAb positivity and antiviral prophylaxis, was statistically associated with the risk of HBV reactivation. HBV reactivation rate was high in patients treated with belatacept when compared with previous transplantation studies. HBV reactivation did not impact survival. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. A systematic antiviral prophylaxis for these patients should be considered and evaluated.

Low Rate of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C During Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) during direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, leading the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) to issue a black box warning on all DAA drug labels recommending monitoring for HBV reactivation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess the rate of HBV reactivation among patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during DAA therapy. Patients with CHC and recovered HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen negative (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core positive), treated with DAAs were included if stored sera were available. Samples were tested for HBV DNA, HBsAg, and ALT. HBV reactivation was considered if (1) HBV DNA was undetectable pre-DAA therapy and became detectable post-therapy, or (2) HBV DNA was detectable pre-treatment, but not quantifiable (< 20IU/mL) and became quantifiable post-treatment. 79 patients with median age of 62years were included. 68% were male and Caucasian. Various DAA regimens were administered for 12-24weeks. Reactivation occurred in 8/79 (10%) of patients and occurred more frequently in men compared to women: 6 during treatment and 2 after treatment. Neither an ALT flare nor HBsAg seroreversion were observed. Detectable HBV DNA was transient in 5/8 and could not be determined in 3/8 but ALT flares were not observed in follow-up of these patients. The risk of HBV reactivation was low in CHC patients with resolved HBV during DAA therapy. Our data support testing for HBV DNA only in selected patients with ALT flares or failure of ALT normalization during DAA treatment.

Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of HBV reactivation in non-liver solid organ transplant recipients with resolved HBV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current guidelines do not recommend routine antiviral prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in non-liver solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with resolved HBV infection, even in anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs)-negative recipients and those receiving intense immunosuppression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of HBV reactivation in non-liver SOT recipients. Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched up to December 31, 2022. Clinical studies reporting HBV reactivation in non-liver SOT recipients were included. Case reports, case series, and cohort studies with a sample size of less than 10 patients were excluded. Random-effects analysis was used for all meta-analyses. We included 2,913 non-liver SOT recipients with resolved HBV infection from 16 retrospective cohort studies in the analysis. The overall HBV reactivation rate was 2.5% (76/2,913; 95% confidence interval [95% CI 1.6%, 3.6%]; I2 = 55.0%). Higher rates of reactivation were observed in recipients with negative anti-HBs (34/421; 7.8%; 95% CI [5.2%, 10.9%]; I2 = 36.0%) by pooling 6 studies, experiencing acute rejection (13/266; 5.8%; 95% CI [2.3%, 14.5%]; I2 = 63.2%) by pooling 3 studies, receiving ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation (8/111; 7.0%; 95% CI [2.9%, 12.7%]; I2 = 0%) by pooling 3 studies, receiving rituximab (10/133; 7.3%; 95% CI [3.4%, 12.6%]; I2 = 0%) by pooling 3 studies, and receiving anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG, 25/504; 4.9%; 95% CI [2.5%, 8.1%]; I2 = 49.0%) by pooling 4 studies. Among recipients with post-transplant HBV reactivation, 11.0% (7/52; 95% CI [4.0%, 20.8%]; I2 = 0.3%) developed HBV-related hepatic failure, and 11.0% (7/52; 95% CI [4.0%, 20.8%]; I2 = 0.3%) had HBV-related death. Negative anti-HBs (crude odds ratio [OR] 5.05; 95% CI [2.83, 9.00]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation (crude OR 2.62; 95% CI [1.05, 6.04]; p = 0.040; I2 = 0%), history of acute rejection (crude OR 2.37; 95% CI [1.13, 4.97]; p = 0.022; I2 = 0%), ATG use (crude OR 3.19; 95% CI [1.48, 6.87]; p = 0.003; I2 = 0%), and rituximab use (crude OR 3.16; 95% CI [1.24, 8.06]; p = 0.016; I2 = 0%) increased the risk of reactivation. Adjusted analyses reported similar results. Limitations include moderate heterogeneity in the meta-analyses and that most studies were conducted in kidney transplant recipients. Non-liver SOT recipients with resolved HBV infection have a high risk of HBV-related hepatic failure and HBV-related death if HBV reactivation occurs. Potential risk factors for HBV reactivation include rituximab use, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin use, anti-HBs negative status, acute rejection history, and ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation. Further research on monitoring and routine antiviral prophylaxis of non-liver SOT recipients at higher risk of HBV reactivation is required.

Direct-Acting Antivirals and the Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Hepatitis B and C Co-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation was observed to be more than 10% in patients receiving interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C (HCV) co-infection. At present, when direct-acting antiviral (DAA) has become the main treatment for HCV, there are few large-scale studies on the reactivation of HBV in these population. We studied HBV reactivation risk and prophylactic HBV treatment efficacy in HBV/HCV co-infected patients receiving DAA therapy. Relevant studies were selected from the Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, KoreaMed, KMbase, and RISS databases through 4 September 2020. Data pooling was carried out using the random-effects method. We identified 39 articles with 119,484 patients with chronic (n = 1673) or resolved (n = 13,497) HBV infection under DAA therapy. When the studies were pooled, the HBV reactivation rate was 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6-19, I2 = 87%), indicating that this population needs careful attention. When stratified by baseline HBV DNA, the undetectable HBV DNA group showed a significantly lower risk of reactivation than the detectable HBV DNA group (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.86, I2 = 0%). Prophylactic HBV therapy reduced HBV reactivation risk (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, I2 = 0%). Patients with a resolved HBV infection showed a negligible rate (0.4%) of HBV reactivation. In conclusion, patients with detectable HBV DNA levels warrant careful monitoring for HBV reactivation and may benefit from preventive anti-HBV treatment.

Application and Impact of Antiviral Therapy for Patients with HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib and Lenvatinib Treatment.

Overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has improved in the era of multi-line sequential therapy. The application of antiviral therapy and its impact on survival for patients with HBV-related HCC needs to be reassessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application and impact of antiviral therapy on survival for patients with HBV-related HCC receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients with advanced HBV-related HCC treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line therapy with (n = 377) and without (n = 182) nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) therapy were retrospectively enrolled. Prognostic factors of OS were evaluated. Secular trends in the increased application of NUC therapy and improved survival were observed in the last decade. The HBV reactivation rate in patients without NUC therapy was 6.6%. By multivariate analysis, baseline low HBV viral load, achieving undetectable HBV DNA after TKI therapy, and ability to receive second-line therapy were found to be independent predictors of OS. In subgroup patients with NUC therapy, starting NUC before TKI was associated with a better OS. In conclusion, the application of antiviral therapy for patients with HBV-related HCC receiving TKI therapy has increased over time. Achieving complete virological suppression may contribute to a better OS in patients with advanced HBV-related HCC.

Incidence of post-transplant hepatitis B virus reactivation with the use of kidneys from donors with resolved hepatitis B virus infection.

Donors with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may be a solution for the organ shortage for kidney transplantation (KT). The purpose of this study was to clarify the current state of HBV markers after KT from donors with resolved HBV infection to HBV naïve recipients and the rate of HBV reactivation in recipients with resolved HBV infection. Furthermore, we investigated HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in transplanted organs from donors with resolved HBV infection and the capability of HBV replication in kidney cell lines. We retrospectively analysed the HBV status of 340 consecutive donors and recipients who underwent KT in a single centre. We prospectively measured cccDNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction in kidney biopsy specimens of 32 donors with resolved HBV infection. HBV reactivation was found in three recipients with resolved HBV infection (4.8%, 3/63) after KT. We analysed 45 cases of transplantation from donors with resolved HBV infection to HBV-naive recipients. One case (2.2%, 1/45) became seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) and in another case (2.2%, 1/45), HBV-DNA was detected qualitatively in an HBV naive recipient with a donor with resolved HBV infection. In the latter case, cccDNA was measured in the donor kidney during KT. HBV replication was observed in kidney cell lines with HBV plasmid transfection. In conclusion, the risk of reactivation in anti-HBc-positive donors is relatively low. However, post-transplant HBV monitoring should be conducted in all at-risk cases.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been explored as first-line treatment in various types of previously untreatable malignancies, while limited evidence is available on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients undergoing immunotherapy. We systematically reviewed data concerning challenges of hepatic adverse events including HBV reactivation and hepatitis in patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing immunotherapy. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, web of science, Embase and Cochrane library up to May 31, 2022. Studies reporting the safety profile of ICIs in patients with HBV infection were eligible. Meta-analyses were conducted to generate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 13 studies including 2561 patients were included for meta-analysis. The overall incidence rates of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic HBV infection and past HBV infection were 1.0% (95% CI 0-3%) and 0% (95% CI 0-0%), respectively. Among patients with chronic HBV infection, the incidence rates of HBV reactivation were 1.0% (95% CI 0-2%) and 10.0% (95% CI 4-18%) for patients with and without antiviral prophylaxis, respectively. Patients with chronic HBV infection were at a higher risk of HBV reactivation compared with those with past HBV infection [OR = 8.69, 95% CI (2.16-34.99)]. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of HBV reactivation [OR = 0.12, 95% CI (0.02-0.67)] and HBV-associated hepatitis [OR = 0.05, 95% CI (0.01-0.28)] in patients with chronic HBV infection. Prophylactic antiviral therapy should be administered to patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing anticancer immunotherapy. Patients with past HBV infection are at lower risk of HBV reactivation compared with those with chronic HBV infection, they could be initiated with antiviral prophylaxis or monitored with the intent of on-demand antiviral therapy.