Rate Of Bile Duct Injury Research Articles

BN SO61 - Modern Surgical Training: A Comparative Commentary

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a cornerstone of benign upper GI surgery; approximately 3% of the population have symptomatic gallstones and over 61,000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies are performed every year in the UK (1). Whilst a relatively safe procedure, bile duct injury is an iatrogenic catastrophe with increased incidence according to the bile duct injury registry. We must consider if the requirements for completion of training (CCT) are robust enough. Indeed, non-surgeons have performed 170 laparoscopic cholecystectomies and would arguably meet the same requirements (2). Method Here we compare CCT requirements for general surgery with upper GI special interest with the requirements for certification in diagnostic endoscopy. This is a procedure performed by upper GI surgeons, with accreditation criteria determined by Joint Advisory Group (JAG) (3) rather than the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (4). Results CCT requires 110 cholecystectomies. Endoscopy requires 250 cases. Within the final 3 months of training, 95% of cases should be physically unassisted and D2 intubation and J manoeuvre should be achieved in 95% of 15 cases. Endoscopy also requires five reflections and attendance of a basic skills course. Cholecystectomy requires three level 4 PBAs (performed fluently without guidance or intervention). Endoscopy requires >25 DOPS with the 5 most recent scoring >90%. 4 summative DOPS must demonstrate competence for independent practice. After CCT, consultants undergo appraisal. After JAG accreditation there is a defined period of supervision. 100 OGDs must be performed a year. Conclusion Diagnostic OGD is an arguably safer and more simple procedure than a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, accreditation requirements for each procedure are wildly different. Comparatively, laparoscopic cholecystectomy lacks stringent indices and has no ongoing accreditation requirements. We suggest that a more robust process might act to combat the increasing rate of life-changing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Evaluating the Role of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Enhancing Safety and Efficacy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment for gallbladder disease, offering less invasive treatment and quicker recovery. However, bile duct injury (BDI) remains a critical complication. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has emerged as a valuable technique to improve biliary structure visualization and potentially reduce BDI during LC. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of ICG in reducing BDI over the past decade. A comprehensive search of studies comparing ICG fluorescence and conventional white light (WL) in LC identified 14 studies. Key outcomes such as operative time, incidence of BDI, and visualization of biliary anatomy were analyzed. The results indicate that ICG significantly reduced operative times in complex cases, with an average reduction of approximately 20 minutes compared to WL (p<0.0001). In routine cases, no significant difference in operative time was observed between the two methods. ICG consistently enhanced visualization of key biliary structures, such as the cystic duct and common bile duct, with the greatest benefits seen in anatomically challenging cases. Although the overall incidence of BDI was low, use of ICG showed a trend toward lower BDI rates compared to WL, though the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the use of ICG fluorescence in LC offers notable advantages, particularly in improving visualization of biliary anatomy and reducing operative time in complex cases. While the overall reduction in BDI rates may appear marginal, the clinical importance of avoiding even a single BDI should not be understated, given the serious complications associated with BDI. Our review suggests that the benefits of ICG are most pronounced in more complex cases where biliary anatomy is challenging to identify.

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes following subtotal cholecystectomy: 10-year single-institution experience

ObjectiveSubtotal cholecystectomy provides a safe, bail-out alternative for difficult gallbladders. However, long-term outcomes comparing fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy subtypes remain underexplored. MethodsThis retrospective cohort included patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy between 2010 and 2020 within a single hospital system. Subtotal cholecystectomy was identified by parsing operative notes for keywords. Demographic and clinical variables were collected by manual review. Patient-reported outcomes were collected via phone using an abbreviated Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index. ResultsWe identified 218 subtotal cholecystectomies, with 113 (51.8%) fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy and 105 (48.2%) reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy and a median follow-up of 63 months (interquartile range 27–106). Rates of bile duct injury (0.9% vs 1.0%; P > .99), bile leak (10.6% vs 9.5%; P > .99), and 30-day readmission (7.6% vs 8.0%; P > .99) did not differ between fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy. For fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy, the postoperative bile leak rate decreased fourfold when cystic duct closure was achieved (6.0% vs 24.1%; P = .012). Subtotal cholecystectomies completed laparoscopically had fewer postoperative bile leaks (2.9% vs 16.8%; P = .001), fewer wound complications (4.8% vs 13.3%; P = .035), and decreased length of stay (7.00 ± 9.07 vs 10.15 ± 13.50 days; P < .001) compared with open operations. The survey response rate was 38.9% (n = 51/131); 47 patients (92.2%) did not report recurrent biliary pain or postprandial nausea or vomiting, but 19 patients (37.2%) reported dietary restriction. Long-term completion cholecystectomy rate was 0.9%. ConclusionGiven no notable difference in postoperative or quality of life outcomes between subtotal cholecystectomy subtypes, consideration of technique depends on intraoperative conditions. Cystic duct closure during fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy and laparoscopic completion of subtotal cholecystectomy are associated with improved postoperative outcomes.

The Hanging Strap Method: A Safe and Easy-to-Use Surgical Technique for Surgeons-in-Training Performing Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction Surgeons-in-training (SIT) perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); however, it is challenging to complete the procedure safely in difficult cases. We present a surgical technique during difficult LC, which we named the hanging strap method. Methods We retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing difficult LC with the hanging strap method (HANGS, n = 34), and patients undergoing difficult LC without the hanging strap method (non-HANGS, n = 56) from 2022 and 2024. Difficult LC was defined as cases classified as more than grade II cholecystitis by the Tokyo Guidelines 18 and cases when LC was undergoing over five days after the onset of cholecystitis. Results The proportion of SIT with post-graduate year (PGY) ≤ 7 was significantly higher in the HANGS group than in the non-HANGS group (82.4% vs. 33.9%, P < 0.001). The overall rate of bile duct injury (BDI), postoperative bile leakage and operative mortality were zero in the whole cohort. There were no significant differences between the HANGS and non-HANGS groups in background characteristics, operative time (122 min vs. 132 min, P = 0.830) and surgical blood loss (14 mL vs. 24 mL, P = 0.533). Conclusions Our findings suggested that the hanging strap method is safe and easy to use for difficult LC. We recommend that the current method be selected as one of the surgical techniques for SIT when performing difficult LC.

A comparison of outcomes including bile duct injury of subtotal cholecystectomy versus open total cholecystectomy as bailout procedures for severe cholecystitis: A multicenter real-world study

BackgroundDense inflammation obscuring the hepatocystic anatomy can hinder the ability to perform a safe standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy in severe cholecystitis, requiring use of a bailout procedure. We compared clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open subtotal cholecystectomy against the traditional standard of open total cholecystectomy to identify the optimal bailout strategy for the difficult gallbladder. MethodsA multicenter, multinational retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent bailout procedures for severe cholecystitis. Procedures were compared using one-way analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis tests and χ2 tests with multiple pairwise comparisons, maintaining a family-wise error rate at 0.05. Multiple multivariate linear/logistical regression models were created. ResultsIn 11 centers, 727 bailout procedures were conducted: 317 laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomies, 172 open subtotal cholecystectomies, and 238 open cholecystectomies. Baseline characteristics were similar among subgroups. Bile leak was common in laparoscopic and open fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomies, with increased intraoperative drain placements and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(P < .05). In contrast, intraoperative bleeding (odds ratio = 3.71 [1.9, 7.22]), surgical site infection (odds ratio = 2.41 [1.09, 5.3]), intensive care unit admission (odds ratio = 2.65 [1.51, 4.63]), and length of stay (Δ = 2 days, P < .001) were higher in open procedures. Reoperation rates were higher for open reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomies (odds ratio = 3.43 [1.03, 11.44]) than other subtypes. The overall rate of bile duct injury was 1.1% and was not statistically different between groups. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy had a bile duct injury rate of 0.63%. ConclusionLaparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a feasible surgical bailout procedure in cases of severe cholecystitis where standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy may carry undue risk of bile duct injury. Open cholecystectomy remains a reasonable option.

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children at paediatric centres and adult centres: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is performed by both paediatric and adult surgeons. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes at paediatric centres (PCs) and adult centres (ACs). A literature search was conducted, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, for papers published between January 2000 and December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® version 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, US). A total of 92 studies involving 74,852 paediatric LCs met the inclusion criteria. Over half (59%) of the LCs were performed at ACs. No significant differences were noted in the male-to-female ratio, mean age or mean body mass index between PCs and ACs. The main indications were cholelithiasis (34.1% vs 34.4% respectively, p=0.83) and biliary dyskinesia (17.0% vs 23.5% respectively, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the median inpatient stay (2.52 vs 2.44 days respectively, p=0.89). Bile duct injury was a major complication (0.80% vs 0.37% respectively, p<0.01). Reoperation rates (2.37% vs 0.74% respectively, p<0.01) and conversion to open surgery (1.97% vs 4.74% respectively, p<0.01) were also significantly different. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in overall complications (p=0.92). The number of LCs performed, intraoperative cholangiography use and conversion rates were higher at ACs whereas bile duct injury and reoperation rates were higher at PCs. Despite a higher incidence of bile duct injury at PCs, the incidence at both PCs and ACs was <1%. In complex cases, a joint operation by both paediatric and adult surgeons might be a better approach to further improve outcomes. Overall, LC was found to be a safe operation with comparable outcomes at PCs and ACs.

Subtotal cholecystectomy as an approach to preventing injury in the left-sided gallbladder in the emergency surgery setting: A case study

A left-sided gallbladder is an unusual anatomic variation that makes gallbladder surgery challenging. Two systematic reviews on surgery for left-sided gallbladder highlighted high iatrogenic bile duct injury rates of 4.4% and 7.3%. This paper reports a female in her 40s with symptoms of acute calculous cholecystitis admitted to a secondary health-care center. After inserting four ports through standard sites for conventional gallbladder surgery, laparoscopic inspection revealed a phlegmonous left-sided gallbladder. No discordant situs of abdominal viscera was noted. Laparoscopic surgery was converted to open subtotal closed-tract cholecystectomy. No post-operative complications related to the surgical site were observed. A left-sided gallbladder affected by severe inflammation and infection is an extraordinary condition that should be considered as a risk factor. If an inflamed left-sided gallbladder is encountered, emergency subtotal cholecystectomy is an alternative to total cholecystectomy when the circumstances to adopt the strategies of a culture of safety in cholecystectomy for complete removal of the gallbladder are unfavorable. Relevance for Patients: Subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with left-sided gallbladder reduces the risk for bile duct injuries, outweighing the potential side effects stemming from this surgical approach.

Comparison of the effects of ampulla-guided realignment and conventional gallbladder triangle anatomy in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

To compare the effects of ampulla-guided realignment and conventional gallbladder triangle anatomy in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC). From June 2021 to August 2022, data from 100 patients undergoing DLC at Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (LC with the ampulla-guided realignment) and the control group (conventional LC with triangular gallbladder anatomy), with 50 patients per group. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, hospitalization time, bile duct injury rate, operation conversion rate, and incidence of postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The pain response and daily activities of the patients in the two groups were evaluated 48 h after the operation. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, hospital stay, operation conversion rate, pain degree at 24 and 48 h after operation, bile duct injury incidence, and total postoperative complication rate were shorter or lower in the experimental group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The Barthel index scores of both groups were higher 48 h after the operation than before the operation, and the experimental group was higher than the control group (p < 0.05). The ampulla-guided alignment in DLC surgery was more beneficial in promoting postoperative recovery, reducing postoperative pain response, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and reducing bile duct injury.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Jos: Prospects and Perspectives.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now done in a lot more private and public hospital settings presently in low-income countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. Though it is not routinely done in these centres, the percentage of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically has increased over the years. Laparoscopic surgery services were introduced at our hospital in 2011 and this retrospective study reviews our outcomes with the procedure over a 6-year period. A total of 87 cholecystectomies were done in the period under review. Forty-eight (55.2%) were laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 30 (44.8%) were open cholecystectomies, and 9 (10.3%) were mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies. There were 32 (66.7%) women and 16 (33.3%) men who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:2. The mean age of the patients was 41.0 years (SD = 14.3 years). The most common indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was calculous cholecystitis. The most common co-morbidity was hypertension in 23 (47.9%) patients, followed by sickle cell anaemia in 10 (20.8%) patients. The operating time ranged from 70 min to 120 min with a mean of 86.6 (SD = 14.5). There were three conversions and two intra-operative complications. Twenty-five patients (52.1%) were discharged within 24 h, 16 (33.3%) within 48 h and the rest (14.6%) were discharged later. The duration of surgery had a significant association with duration of hospital stay. There was 1 mortality in our study. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers unique advantages over open such as decreased length of hospital stay and reduced wound complications. Most of the cholecystectomies in our setting are now performed laparoscopically with a low conversion rate and low incidence of bile duct injuries. Patients with sickle cell disease constitute a significant percentage of patients requiring this procedure.

The Use of Intraoperative Cholangiography During Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.

Cholecystectomy is a widespread surgical procedure for gallbladder diseases. Evolving techniques and technologies, such as intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), enhance safety and outcomes by providing real-time biliary system visualization during surgery. This systematic review explored available data on using IOC during cholecystectomy, highlighting its effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness. To perform this systematic review, a thorough literature search was conducted using relevant keywords in electronic databases, such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We included studies published during the last 10 years exploring the use of IOC during cholecystectomy. The findings showed success rates of up to 90% with a median time of 21.9 minutes without complications. Most (90%) patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent cholecystectomy with IOC, with unclear IOC results in 10.7% and failure in 14.7%. IOC failure factors included age, body mass index (BMI), male sex, concurrent acute cholecystitis, common bile duct (CBD) stone evidence on imaging, CBD diameter of >6 mm, total bilirubin of >4 mg/dL, abnormal liver tests, and gallstone pancreatitis. The detection of choledocholithiasis by IOC prompted trans-cystic duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Biliary abnormalities and stone identification were observed using IOC, and routine use increased bile duct stone detection while decreasing bile duct injury and readmission rates. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of IOC for common bile duct stone detection were reported at 77%, 98%, 97.2%, 63%, and 99%, respectively. Routine IOC was projected to provide substantial quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and cost-effectiveness gains compared to selective IOC. Regarding safety, IOC was generally associated with reduced complication and open surgery conversion risks, with similar rates of CBD injury and bile leaks. These findings indicate that IOC enhances cholecystectomy outcomes through precision and decreasing complications.

The Role of Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy as the Initial Investigative Modality for Significant Bile Leak following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introduction: Currently, the rate of bile duct injury and leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still higher than for open surgery. Diverse investigative algorithms were suggested for bile leak, shifting from hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) toward invasive and more sophisticated means. We aimed to analyze the use of biliary scan as the initial modality to investigate significant bile leak in the drain following LC, attempting to avoid potential unnecessary invasive means when the scan demonstrate fair passage of nuclear substance to the intestine, without leak. Methods: We have conducted a prospective non-randomized study, mandating hepatobiliary scintigraphy first, for asymptomatic patients harboring drain in the gallbladder fossa, leaking more than 50 mL/day following LC. Analysis was done based on medical data from the surgical, gastroenterology, and the nuclear medicine departments. Results: Among 3,124 patients undergoing LC, significant bile leak in the drain was seen in 67 subjects, of whom we started with HBS in 50 patients, presenting our study group. In 27 of whom, biliary scan was the only investigative modality, showing fair passage of the nuclear isotope to the duodenum and absence of leak in the majority. The leak stopped spontaneously within a mean of 3.6 days, and convalescence as well as outpatient clinic follow-up was uneventful. In 23 patients, biliary scan that was interpreted as abnormal was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). However, ERCP did not demonstrate any bile leak in 13 subjects. In 17 patients, ERCP was used initially, without biliary scan, suggesting the possibility of avoiding invasive modalities in 7 patients. Conclusions: Based on a negative predictive value of 91%, we suggest that in cases of asymptomatic significant bile leak through a drain following LC, a normal HBS as the initial modality can safely decrease the rate of using invasive modalities.

Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is rapidly being adopted into practice, partly based on the belief that it offers specific technical and safety advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery. Whether robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is safer than laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains unclear. To determine the uptake of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and to analyze its comparative safety vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This retrospective cohort study used Medicare administrative claims data for nonfederal acute care hospitals from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Participants included 1 026 088 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 66 to 99 years of age who underwent cholecystectomy with continuous Medicare coverage for 3 months before and 12 months after surgery. Data were analyzed August 17, 2022, to June 1, 2023. Surgical technique used to perform cholecystectomy: robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic approaches. The primary outcome was rate of bile duct injury requiring definitive surgical reconstruction within 1 year after cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes were composite outcome of bile duct injury requiring less-invasive postoperative surgical or endoscopic biliary interventions, and overall incidence of 30-day complications. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed adjusting for patient factors and clustered within hospital referral regions. An instrumental variable analysis was performed, leveraging regional variation in the adoption of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy within hospital referral regions over time, to account for potential confounding from unmeasured differences between treatment groups. A total of 1 026 088 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [12.0] years; 53.3% women) were included in the study. The use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy increased 37-fold from 211 of 147 341 patients (0.1%) in 2010 to 6507 of 125 211 patients (5.2%) in 2019. Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury necessitating a definitive operative repair within 1 year (0.7% vs 0.2%; relative risk [RR], 3.16 [95% CI, 2.57-3.75]). Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was also associated with a higher rate of postoperative biliary interventions, such as endoscopic stenting (7.4% vs 6.0%; RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.16-1.33]). There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complication rates between the 2 procedures. The instrumental variable analysis, which was designed to account for potential unmeasured differences in treatment groups, also showed that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury (0.4% vs 0.2%; RR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.14-2.63]). This cohort study's finding of significantly higher rates of bile duct injury with robotic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests that the utility of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy should be reconsidered, given the existence of an already minimally invasive, predictably safe laparoscopic approach.

Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe role of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. CT cholangiography (CTC) provides a reliable assessment of biliary anatomy, potentially reducing operating times, open conversion, and complication rates. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of routine pre-operative CTC.MethodsA single centre retrospective analysis was undertaken of all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021. Information was obtained from a general surgical database alongside hospital electronic medical records. T-tests and Chi2 tests were used to assess statistical significance.ResultsOf 1079 patients, 129 (12.0%) underwent routine pre-operative CTC, 786 (72.8%) routine IOC, and 161 patients (14.9%) neither modality. Comparing CTC and IOC, the CTC group had higher rates of open conversion (3.1% vs. 0.6%, p 0.009), subtotal cholecystectomies (3.1% vs. 0.8%, p 0.018), and length of stay (1.47 vs. 1.18 nights, p 0.015). Comparing the prior groups together against those utilising neither modality, the latter had reduced operative time (66.29 vs. 72.47, p 0.011), but increased rate of bile leak (1.9% vs. 0.4%, p 0.037) and bile duct injury (1.2% vs. 0.2%, p 0.049). Co-dependence between operative complications was noted in linear regression.ConclusionBiliary imaging with either CTC or IOC is beneficial in reducing bile leak and bile duct injury, and its routine use LC is recommended. However, routine CTC is inferior to routine IOC in preventing conversions to open surgery and subtotal cholecystectomy. Further research may be undertaken to evaluate criteria for a selective CTC protocol.

The Surgical outcomes of fundus-first technique in lowering the rate of bile duct injuries and bleeding during open cholecystectomy that facing intraoperative difficulties: A single-center prospective study

Background: The problem of difficult gallbladder is not clearly defined and associated with real missing of therapeutic approaches that decreased morbidity. Moreover, the difficult gallbladder was reported as a contributing risk factor for biliary injury due to raised difficulty in surgical dissection within Calot’s triangle. The aim of this study is to determine the surgical outcomes of the open fundus-first cholecystectomy in lowering the rate of lethal intraoperative risks.&#x0D; Subjects and Methods: Our prospective study conducted during the period of January 2019 to December 2022 at Ibn Sina specialized hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, for two hundred and fifty-three patients underwent elective open fundus-first cholecystectomy for intraoperative difficulties.&#x0D; Results: the majority of cases had long-standing cholelithiasis with intraoperative difficulties revealed by pre-operative TUS and MRCP which required open fundus-first cholecystectomy in 173 (68.4%) of patients, (P-value &lt;0.05). The operative surgical time was 120 minutes in 103 patients (40.7%), (P-value &lt;0.05). During open cholecystectomy, variable intraoperative difficulties were found in all patients, (P-value &lt;0.05) and were divided into: (A) Contracted intra-hepatic gallbladder seen in 157 (62.1%) of cases; (B) Distorted anatomy within Calot's triangle seen in 135 (53.4%) of patients; and (C) Intraoperative bleeding from the liver bed was observed as bloody oozing form in 150 (59.3%) of cases. Our patients had minimal postoperative complications like mild wound infection in 8 (3.2%) of cases and mortality rate was zero. &#x0D; Conclusions: There is a need for appropriate therapeutic and preventive strategies in healthcare systems for safe dealing with difficult cholecystectomy. Unclear anatomy due to severe inflammatory dense adhesions at Calot’s triangle and CBD stones needing difficult surgeries are the most important limiting factors for fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hence, we humbly recommend an open approach of fundus-first cholecystectomy as safe surgical option to reduce the incidence of bile duct injuries and intra-operative bleeding.

Detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy represents one of the most performed surgical procedures. Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are a dangerous complication of this intervention. With the advent of the laparoscopy, the rate of BDIs showed a growing trend that was partially justified by the learning curve of this technique. A literature search was conducted on Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published up to October 2022 that analyzed the intraoperative detection and management of BDIs diagnosed during cholecystectomy. According to the literature, approximately 25% of BDIs is diagnosed during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the clinical suspicion of BDI, an intraoperative cholangiography is performed to confirm it. Complimentary technology, such as near-infrared cholangiography, can be also adopted. Intraoperative ultrasound represents a useful tool to furtherly define the biliary and the vascular anatomy. The proper classification of the type of BDI allows to identify the correct treatment. When a good expertise in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery is available, a direct repair is performed with good outcomes both in case of simple and complex lesions. When the local resources are limited or there is a lack of dedicated surgical experience, patient referral to a reference center shows better outcomes. In particular, complex vasculo-biliary injuries require a highly specialized treatment. The key elements to transfer the patients are a good documentation of the injury, a proper drainage of the abdomen, and an antibiotic therapy. BDI management requires a proper diagnostic process and prompt treatment to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this feared complication occurring during cholecystectomy.

Use of Critical View of Safety and Proctored Preceptorship in Preventing Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-Experience of 3726 Cases From a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute.

Bile duct injury (BDI) continues to occur despite technological advances and improvements in surgical training over the past 2 decades. This study was conducted to audit our data on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed over the past 2 decades to determine the role of Critical View of Safety (CVS) and proctored preceptorship in preventing BDI and postoperative complications. All patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analyzed retrospectively. The data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database from January 2004 to December 2019. Proctored preceptorship was used in all cases. Intraoperative details included the number of patients where CVS was defined, number of BDI and conversions. Postoperative outcomes, including hospital stay, morbidity, and bile duct stricture, were noted. Three thousand seven hundred twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Trainee surgeons performed 31.6% of surgeries and 9.5% of these surgeries were taken over by the senior surgeon. A CVS could be delineated in 96.6% of patients. The major BDI rate was only 0.05%. This study reiterates the fact that following the basic tenets of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy, defining and confirming CVS, and following proctored preceptorship are critical in preventing major BDI.

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study.

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) result in major morbidity and incidental mortality. There is a lack of unselected population-based cross-sectional studies on the incidence, management, and outcomes of BDI. We hypothesised that due to improved imaging capabilities and collective laparoscopic experience, BDI incidence will decrease over the study period and compare favourably with contemporary literature. After IRB approval, all cholecystectomies performed at national public healthcare facilities between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. BDIs were classified according to the Strasberg classification. The follow-up period ranged from 36 to 156months. A total of 241 BDIs of 29,739 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) resulted in overall, minor, and major BDI incidence rates of 0.81%, 0.68%, and 0.13%, respectively. No significant decline in the BDIs was noted during the study period. Drainage in 66 (42.6%) and cases ERCP stent placement in 65 (41.9%) cases were equally used in Strasberg A lesions. Suture over T-tube in 20 (42.6%) and ERCP stenting in 19 (40.4%) cases were used in Strasberg D lesions. Roux-en-Y hepatojejunostomy (RYHJ) was performed in 30 (88.9%) of Strasberg E lesions. There were 27 (11.2%) patients with long-term bile duct strictures after BDI management. The overall mortality rate of BDIs and subsequent complications was 4.6%. The annual incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury over an 11-years' time after laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not decline significantly. We noted an overall BDI incidence of 0.81% comprising of 0.68% minor and 0.13% of major lesions. The management of injuries met contemporary guidelines with comparable outcomes.

Evaluation of 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective observational Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (IAGES) Study.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for benign gallstone disease. There are no robust Indian data on the 30-day morbidity and mortality of this procedure. A prospective multicentre observational study was conducted by the Indian Association of Gastro-Intestinal Endo Surgeons (IAGES) to assess the 30-day morbidity and mortality of LC in India. Participating surgeons were invited to submit data on all consecutive LCs for benign diseases performed between 09/12/2020 and 08/03/2021 in adults. Primary outcome measures were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with primary outcomes. A total of 293 surgeons from 125 centres submitted data on 6666 patients. Of these, 71.7% (n = 4780) were elective. A total LC was carried out in 95% (n = 6331). Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 1.9% (n = 126) and the procedure were converted to open in 1.4% of patients. Bile duct injury was seen in 0.3% (n = 20). Overall, 30-day morbidity and mortality were 11.1% (n = 743) and 0.2% (n = 14), respectively. Nature of practice, ischemic heart disease, emergency surgery, postoperative intensive care, and postoperative hospital stay were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Age, weight, body mass index, duration of symptoms, nature of the practice, history of Coronavirus Disease-2019, previous major abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, use of electrosurgical or ultrasonic or bipolar energy for cystic artery control; use of polymer clips for cystic duct control; conversion to open surgery, subtotal cholecystectomy, simultaneous common bile duct exploration, mucocele, gangrenous gall bladder, dense adhesions, intraoperative cholangiogram, and use of drain were independently associated with 30-day morbidity. LC has 30-day morbidity of 11.1%, 30-day mortality of 0.2%, conversion to open rate of 1.4%, and bile duct injury rate of 0.3% in India.

The Result of the Critical View of Safety Timeout Technique in Prevention of Bile Duct Injury in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study at a Large Community Teaching Hospital

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment for cholelithiasis. However, despite improvements in technology and implementation of a safer approach, such as the critical view of safety (CVS) technique, the risk of bile duct injury (BDI) remains an issue. Objective: To review LC cases at a large community hospital for BDIs and compare BDI rates between conventional technique and CVS timeout approaches. The authors hypothesized that there would be lower BDI rates in the CVS timeout group. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 1,033 consecutive patients that underwent LC at the authors’ institution between November 2015 and November 2018. Based on the timeout document and operative reports, the authors classified patients into CVS timeout and no CVS (noCVS) timeout groups and compared the BDI rates and other relevant clinical outcomes. Results: Among the 1,033 patients, 635 and 398 patients were in the noCVS timeout and CVS timeout groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of BDI between the two groups at 1.1% versus 1.8%, respectively (p=0.375). The CVS group exhibited less preemptive conversion to open cholecystectomy, lower incidence of uncontrolled intraoperative bleeding, shorter operative time, and shorter length of hospital stay than the noCVS group. In multivariate regression analysis, operative time of more than 90 minutes was the significant independent risk factor associated with BDI, while previous biliary inflammation was marginally associated with BDI. Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate the beneficial effect of CVS timeout in preventing the development of BDI. The reasons could be attributed to surgeons’ competency with their varying skills and experience, the occurrence of injury before timeout, the case selection biases, or the wrong CVS identification. Further review of the actual surgical videos may offer more clarity into the unexpected outcome. Keywords: Bile duct injuries; Critical view of safety; Infundibular techniques; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes

Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparoscopic technique introduction for the cholecystolithiasis treatment. The study's objective was to determine the frequency of iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out on 131 bile duct injuries sustainable patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at General Hospital, Lahore for the duration of six months from May 2021 to October 2021. All the patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Ethical approval and informed consent were taken from the institutional ethical committee and individual respectively. The data outcomes such as time details of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and injuries recognition, injury types, injuries definitive repair time, IBDI management, intraoperative cholangiography use, post-operative complications, laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy conversion, bile duct injury, morbidity, postoperative outcomes, and mortality rate were recorded. SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 131 referred patients were treated for iatrogenic bile duct injury caused by open cholecystectomy (n = 60), and Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 71). During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile duct injuries were identified in only 28 (39.4%) patients. Following the LC conversion to open operation, 50%successive procedures were deemed ineffective. In case of no recognizedinjury during LC, bile leak/peritonitis was developed in 70% of patients, with nearly half being referred and the remainder underwentvarious procedures recommended by their surgeon.The rest of the patient’sdeveloped and abnormal liver function, jaundice, cholangitis. About 43% of patients underwent IOC, but two-thirds of patients did not have an injury. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy developed bile duct injury was more severe compared to the IBDI in open cholecystectomy. One patient died during definitive repair and 92% of patients were recovered without any complications. Conclusion:The iatrogenic bile duct injury increasing rate is a major surgical intervention challenge. Multidisciplinary treatment should be followed for iatrogenic bile duct injury prevention and management. Bile duct injury could be effectively treated when suspected and confirmed patients are referred to tertiary care hospitals. Keywords: Iatrogenic bile duct injuries; Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Complications