Revision Rate Research Articles

Hip contact force pathways in total hip replacement differ between patients and activities of daily living

One of the main causes of implant failure and revision surgery in total hip replacement (THR) is aseptic loosening often caused by the accumulation of wear debris arising between the contact surfaces of the acetabular cup and femoral head during activities of daily living (ADL’s). However, limited information is available regarding the contact force pathways between these two surfaces during specific ADL’s. In this study, through musculoskeletal modelling, we aimed to estimate the orientation of the hip contact force pathway on the acetabular cup. One hundred and thirty-two THR patients underwent motion capture analysis whilst undertaking locomotor and non-locomotor ADL’s. Musculoskeletal simulations were performed to calculate contact force pathways using inverse dynamics analysis. We then qualitatively compared differences in the contact force pathways between patients and between ADL’s. Walking resulted in a typical figure-of-eight pattern, with the peak contact forces occurring in the superior-anterior area of the cup. The non-locomotive activities such as stand up, sit down and squat had a more linear shape, spanning across the superior-posterior quarter of the cup. Our results showed a large inter-patient variability in the shape and location of the contact force pathway.There is a distinct difference in the location and shape of the pathway between locomotor and non-locomotor activities and this could result in different wear accumulations. These results could enhance our understanding why revision rates vary across the population and could inform the development of personalised implant design.

Septoplasty versus non-surgical management for deviated nasal septum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for patients experiencing nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS). We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and ISRCTN for relevant RCTs. The primary outcomes included the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), surgical complications, and quality of life. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4 and STATA 18, with effect estimates presented as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024538373). Our search identified 537 studies, of which 3 RCTs involving 721 participants met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that septoplasty significantly improved NOSE and SNOT-22 scores compared to non-surgical interventions at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, despite no notable differences at 3 months post-treatment. No significant difference was observed regarding nasal flow assessed by PNIF. The rate of complications was low, ranging from 0.31% (revision rate) to 4.12% (bleeding and infection rates). Additionally, our qualitative synthesis showed an improvement in the quality of life at 6 and 12 months in the septoplasty group compared with the non-surgical group. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 721 patients revealed the efficacy of septoplasty, with or without turbinate surgery, in improving nasal obstruction symptoms at 6 and 12 months. Additionally, septoplasty consists of a relatively low rate of complications such as bleeding, infection, and septal perforation. Furthermore, a low revision rate was found. Septoplasty improved the quality of life, especially after 6 and 12 months. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research is needed to consolidate our results.

Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography for catheter placement verification in pediatric hydrocephalus: technical note.

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement, essential for managing hydrocephalus, often risks catheter malpositioning, especially in patients with small ventricles. We present a novel technique combining neuronavigation with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography using the BrainLab system and Loop-X mobile imaging unit. This approach enables real-time verification of catheter placement by integrating preoperative MRI data with intraoperative CT imaging. In a 12-year-old boy with therapy-refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, neuronavigation was guided by the BrainLab Skull Fix and Cushing canula, ensuring precise catheter insertion into the right frontal horn. Post-placement, Loop-X facilitated immediate verification of the catheter's trajectory and positioning, corroborated by postoperative MRI. This technique demonstrated high precision and minimized radiation exposure, emphasizing its utility in reducing revision rates due to suboptimal catheter placement.

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty after Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Technique, Results, and Complications.

Introduction: Surgical rhinoplasty is a complex procedure with a high revision rate. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty (NSR) could avoid secondary rhinoplasty allowing the correction of postsurgical defects. A systematic review has been performed among adult patients who had previously undergone surgical rhinoplasty and now presenting for NSR with filler, demonstrated most common indications, fillers, and complications in this technique. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) system guidelines. Primary outcomes included indications for NSR in patients with prior rhinoplasty and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included filler material and degree of patient satisfaction. Results: Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria, obtaining 2,048 patients analyzed in the review. Hyaluronic acid was the most used filler, found in 67% of patients. Indications were highly variable, considering deformities of the middle third of the nose the most remarkable. A high degree of satisfaction was found in the analyzed studies and the rate of major complications was low. Discussion and Conclusions: NSR in patients with prior rhinoplasty is a useful option for correcting a range from subtle aesthetic defects to severe nasal deformities. However, this technique is not exempt from complications, since an increased risk of skin necrosis has been observed.

All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers Excellent Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study.

Background and Objectives: The ten-year survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is up to 96%, varying from implants and hospitals; however, most of registry studies do not distinguish between metal-back (MB) tibial implants and all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants. The aim of the present retrospective clinical study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and survivorship of medial and lateral UKA with a newly designed all-polyethylene tibial plateau at short-term follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent medial or lateral UKA with AP tibial plateau was conducted, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Primary outcomes were clinical score (VAS, OKS, and KOOS) variations from baseline up to the latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes were Likert scale variations from baseline to the follow-up, evaluation of the influence of demographic factors (age and BMI) at the time of surgery on the clinical outcomes, and evaluation of revision rate up to the last follow-up. Results: The final study population included 99 knees. The mean VAS score for the medial group significantly decreased from 7.61 ± 1.65 (pre-intervention) to 2.74 ± 2.26 (post-intervention). Similar improvements were registered for the OKS as well, for both the medial group (from 22.5 ± 12.6 to 36.6 ± 10.6, with a delta of 14.11 (10.05 to 18.17)) and the lateral group (from 22.6 ± 12.6 to 36.9 ± 11.8, with a delta of 14.24 (8.65 to 19.83)). Moreover, all the KOOS subscales reported an amelioration, both in medial UKA and lateral UKA. Furthermore, a logistic regression of delta VAS was performed in relation to the other clinical questionnaires and the demographic factors. For both medial and lateral UKAs, no statistically significant correlation was found between the VAS scale regression and the demographic factors. The survival rate free from any revision of the cohort at the latest follow-up was 96.32%. Conclusions: All-polyethylene tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty demonstrates significant improvements in clinical scores and a low failure rate at short-term follow-up.

Head size in Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a comparative registry study.

Optimal bearing size in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been clearly ascertained, but large diameter ceramic balls may improve function and implant stability, with minimal concerns for wear. Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA were stratified based on head diameter (32, 36 and 40mm), aiming to assess: 1) survival rates, reasons for revision and hazard ratios for failure; 2) survival rates and hazard ratios for aseptic loosening, dislocation/primary instability, liner failure. A regional arthroplasty registry was enquired about Delta COC THA performed for primary osteoarthritis, stratified by head size. 13,161 primary cementless THAs were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 5.7years (range: 0-17): 3980 (30.2%) 32mm balls, 8327 (63.3%) 36mm heads, 854 (6.5%) 40mm heads. The three cohorts achieved similar survival rates (p = 0.99) and adjusted hazard ratios (p > 0.05). No revisions for head breakage or metallosis occurred. When revision for cup aseptic loosening was the endpoint, the survival rates of three cohorts (p = 0.08) and the adjusted hazard ratios (p > 0.05) were similar. The three cohorts achieved comparable survival rates when revision for dislocation/primary instability was the endpoint (p = 0.08). When the endpoint was revision for liner breakage, 32mm cohort showed higher rates of revision (p = 0.01). No liner failure was detected in the 40mm cohort. 32mm, 36mm and 40mm provided similar 10-year survival rates in Delta COC THA. 40mm heads emerged as safe options but did not lower the revisions for dislocations/primary instability. IV (therapeutic study).

Conversion of UKA to TKA using identical standard implants—How does it compare to primary UKA, primary TKA and revision TKA?

BackgroundUKA is a well-established treatment option for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, resulting in superior functional outcomes but also higher revision rates than TKA. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of UKA, TKA, UKA converted to TKA using identical standard implants and revised TKA to support clinical decision-making.MethodsIn this study, we retrospectively examined 116 patients who underwent UKA, 77 patients who received TKA, 28 patients whose UKA was converted to TKA using identical standard implants, and 21 patients who had a one-stage revision of TKA. The mean age at operation was 66.5 years (39–90 years), with a mean BMI of 28.8 kg/m2 (17.4–58.8) and a mean follow-up period of four years (0.9–9.9 years). We assessed various PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score, UCLA score, KSS score, and a modified WOMAC-Score as well as patient satisfaction and ability to resume daily activities, work, and sports.ResultsThe highest patient satisfaction was seen in the UKA. All scores were significantly higher for UKA than for TKA, converted UKA, and revised TKA. None of the scores showed a significant inferiority of converted UKA to TKA. In the case of revision, two scores showed significantly better results for converted UKA than for revised TKA.ConclusionsOur results indicated that patients initially treated with UKA did not have significantly worse functional outcomes after conversion to TKA, given the use of identical standard implants. This highlights the effectiveness of UKA as a therapeutic option with outcomes superior to those of primary TKA and the importance of a bone-sparing procedure. Conversely, revision TKA is linked to poorer functional outcomes compared to both primary arthroplasties.

A Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique for Eight-Plate Hemiepiphysiodesis: Description and Evaluation.

Background: Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with tension band plates or eight-plates is a common surgical procedure to treat malalignment of the lower limb axis in skeletally immature patients. The objective of this study was to compare a new minimally invasive surgical procedure with the conventional procedure and evaluate its safety and effectiveness in order to reduce the risk of hypertrophic scarring, which may cause functional impairment as well as cosmetic issues. Methods: Sixty-five growth plates of either the femur or the tibia were evaluated in 33 patients treated for genu valgum or varum between 2010 and 2017. Each growth plate was considered an individual case. The modified procedure was used in 17 cases and the conventional procedure in 48 cases. The modified surgical procedure is characterized by an 8 mm incision and preparation of the epi-periosteal layer, in which the eight-plate is positioned via a guide-wire. Positioning and implantation are controlled via fluoroscopy. Skin incision length, duration of surgery, revision rate, achievement of a defined correction goal, and correction rate were analyzed. Results: Using the minimally invasive procedure, the mean skin incision length (23.94 ± 10.18 mm vs. 8.75 ± 2.14 mm, p < 0.001) could be significantly reduced. No significant difference was found in regard to the duration of surgery, revision rate, achievement of the correction goal or correction rate. Conclusions: The minimally invasive procedure results in a reduction in incision length without significant impact on the duration of surgery, revision rate, achievement of correction goal or correction rate. Consequently, the modified procedure can be regarded as equally as effective and safe as the conventional procedure.

Survivorship of Primary NexGen Knee Replacement: Comparing Cementless Trabecular Metal to Other Designs of Tibial Component.

The impact of cementless trabecular metal (TM) implants on implant survivorship are not well delineated. This study compares primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision rates of cemented knee replacements with two cementless knee replacement designs-cementless TM and a non-TM cementless design. Data from a national registry queried TKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis from 1999 to 2020. The risk of revision of Zimmer NexGen TKA using cementless TM, cementless non-TM, and cemented non-TM were compared. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and Cox hazard ratios (HR), stratified by age and gender. Cementless TM components had higher risks of revision compared with cementless non-TM implants (HR = 1.49; p ≤ 0.001). Cementless TM implants showed higher risks of revision compared with cemented non-TM prostheses for the first 2 years (HR = 1.75, p < 0.001). Non-TM prostheses posed equal risk of revision for cementless and cemented fixations (HR = 0.95, p = 0.522). Patients aged 55 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years had a higher risk of revision for cementless TM compared with cementless non-TM (HR = 1.40, p = 0.033 and HR = 1.79, p < 0.001, respectively) and cemented non-TM implants (HR = 1.51, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.54, p < 0.001, respectively). The study shows there is an increased risk of revision with TM cementless implants for patients aged 55 to 74 years. These results do not support the use of TM tibial implants for patients of this age group for primary TKA.

A Single-Surgeon 35-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Auto- and Allografts With the Transtibial Technique.

Long-term follow-up for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited due to heterogeneity in the number of techniques utilized, the number of surgeons included, and attrition bias. To analyze a single surgeon's 35-year experience with ACLR using the transtibial technique, with an emphasis on temporal trends in graft selection and subanalyses on rates of revision surgery, contralateral ACLR, and nonrevision reoperation among different demographic cohorts of patients. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. All patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted single-bundle ACLR between 1986 and 2021 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-surgeon registry. Outcomes of interest included revision, reoperation, and contralateral rupture rates. A total of 2915 ACLRs were performed during the senior surgeon's career. The mean age for primary ACLR was 29.4 ± 14.8 years. During primary ACLR, 98.4% of patients received a central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft. Increasing patient age was associated with increasing allograft usage (P < .01), with a significant temporal increase in allograft usage over the senior surgeon's career (P < .01). There was a higher revision rate among younger patients (P < .01), female patients aged 21 to 25 years (P = .01), and patients who received an allograft during the primary procedure (P = .04). The contralateral rupture rate showed no difference between sexes (P = .34); however, patients who underwent ACLR with autograft had a greater rate of contralateral injury compared with those with allograft (P < .01). The contralateral rupture rate was greater than the revision rate (P < .01). The most common causes of nonrevision reoperation were failed meniscal repair, new meniscal tears, arthrofibrosis, and painful hardware removal. The findings of this single-surgeon registry reveal temporal trends in ACLR over a 35-year career. There was a trend toward increasing BPTB allograft use in ACLR, especially in older patients and revision cases. A greater revision rate was observed among younger patients, female patients, and those receiving allografts during primary surgery. Contralateral ACLR was more common than revision surgery.

Transfemoral amputation due to uncontrollable infections after implantation of a total knee endoprosthesis

In the evaluation of an internal analysis of data on the increased effort for nursing during rehabilitation of patients with amputations in the Baumrainklinik of the HELIOS Rehabilitation Center Bad Berleberg, the number of patients with transfemoral amputations (TFA) due to uncontrollable multiple infections after implantation of a total knee endoprosthesis (total knee arthroplasty, TKA) was clearly emphasized. This article discusses the results of a retrospective, patient-controlled trial (PCT) and compares these with the data of the German Endoprosthesis Registry (EPRD). The study concentrated on patients who were admitted to rehabilitation after a TFA due to an uncontrollable infection after implantation of a knee TKA. The primary aims were the identification of patients who developed an uncontrollable infection after TKA with subsequent TFA and the comparison with national and international revision and amputation rates after TKA. An analysis of the medical history questionnaire was carried out for all 787 patients with amputation of the lower extremities who underwent rehabilitation in the time period from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2015. The patient records were systematically analyzed based on the standardized documentation methods of the medical and nursing personnel using the Barthel index, the activity/function classes, phantom pain and length of stay, including demography, infection history and insurance company. The analysis showed that 10 patients, 2.29% of all TFA, suffered the loss of a lower extremity due to an uncontrollable TKA infection. The revision rate 3 years after primary TKA in Germany is 3.0% (EPRD annual report 2023), whereas values of 1-4% are given in the international literature (status 2020). In the patient group of the EPRD, in 2022 revision surgery was necessary due to an infection in 15.0% of the cases. The current statistics of the EPRD (annual report 2023) show that 3 years after the initial revision surgery due to an infected TKA another revision was necessary in 23.5-30% of cases. These numbers are alarming and should be critically evaluated and monitored. The future aim is to identify the causes of infections, systematic errors in the TKA and the pathogens that lead to infections after TKA and to correlate the associations.

Comparative analysis and validation of posterior cruciate ligament management in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Meta-analysis and animal study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee joint diseases. The debate over preserving or sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in mobile-bearing TKA (MB TKA) still needs to be solved due to the lack of high-quality evidence, particularly meta-analyses comparing these techniques. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of PCL retention (CR) and PCL sacrifice (PS) in terms of clinical and functional knee scores, range of motion, complication rates, and revision rates and to validate these findings through animal experiments. A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Relevant studies were selected for the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Additionally, an animal experiment using Sprague-Dawley rats simulated MB TKA to compare the effects of PCL retention and sacrifice surgeries. 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found between CR and PS techniques regarding HSS, KSS, KSFS, WOMAC, ROM, and medial/lateral instability. However, CR MB showed slight superiority in NKJS, while PS MB had better outcomes in complication and revision rates. In the animal study, CR rats exhibited significant early postoperative inflammation, but both groups' knee structures gradually normalized. The meta-analysis indicates that PCL retention (CR MB) and sacrifice (PS MB) have similar effects on various clinical and functional knee scores. However, PS MB is significantly better at reducing complications and revision rates. The animal experiment confirms PS MB's advantages in reducing inflammation and promoting joint recovery. Despite the strong evidence, long-term follow-up and larger-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: Predictors of Subsequent Revision Surgery and Economic Burden amongst Medicare Beneficiaries

Revision shoulder arthroplasty continues to add an increasing burden on patients and the healthcare system. This study aimed to delineate long-term shoulder arthroplasty revision incidence, quantify associated Medicare spending, and identify relevant predictors of both revision and spending. The complete 2016-2022(Q3) Medicare fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data was analyzed. Patients receiving a primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, rotator cuff pathology, or inflammatory arthropathy were included and subsequent ipsilateral revision surgeries were identified. The time to revision was modeled using the Prentice, Williams, and Peterson Gap Time Model. Medicare spending within 90 days post-discharge was modeled using a generalized linear model. The analysis was subdivided by index procedure type: anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A total of 82,949 primary TSAs and 172,524 RSAs were identified. Compared to index TSA cases, index RSA cases had a lower first revision rate in an observation window of nearly 7 years (1.9% vs. 3.5%, p<0.001), but a higher rate of second (11.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.001) as well as third revision (13.8% vs. 13.8%, p=0.449). TSA spending was significantly lower than RSA spending for the index procedure ($21,531 vs. $23,267, p<0.001), first ($23,096 vs. $26,414, p<0.001), and second ($25,060 vs. $29,983, p<0.001) revision. There was no statistically significant difference in third revision between TSA and RSA groups ($31,313 vs. $30,829, p=0.860). Age, sex, race, and rheumatoid arthritis were among the top predictors of revisions. Top predictors of Medicare spending included having a non-osteoarthritis surgical indication, a hospital stay of three or more days, a discharge to a setting other than home, malnutrition, dementia, stroke, major kidney diseases, and being operated on in a teaching hospital. Compared with TSA, RSA was associated with a lower first revision rate, but a higher subsequent revision rate. An index RSA procedure was also associated with higher initial Medicare spending as well as subsequent revision surgery spending compared with an index TSA procedure. Demographics and comorbid medical conditions were among the top predictors of revisions, while procedure-related factors predicted Medicare spending.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Multiligament Knee Injuries in a Cohort Including Competitive Athletes With Long-Term Follow-Up.

There is a paucity of outcomes data on surgical reconstruction for multiligament knee injury (MLKI) in the orthopaedic literature. To examine functional and return-to-sports (RTS) outcomes and revision rates after single-stage reconstruction for MLKIs in a cohort containing a large proportion of competitive athletes over a 20-year period. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We identified all patients at our institution who underwent surgical reconstruction for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or bicruciate (ACL-posterior cruciate ligament) MLKI between 2001 and 2020 and had ≥2 years of postoperative outcome data. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, a surgical satisfaction survey, and questions about subsequent knee surgery and RTS administered via telephone. Summary statistics for all outcomes data were calculated, and predictors of IKDC scores at follow-up were examined using univariable linear regression. Out of 151 patients eligible for this study, outcomes data were collected in 119 patients (79%). The mean follow-up time was 8.3 ± 4.4 years, and the mean IKDC score at follow-up was 79 ± 17. A total of 83 competitive athletes were included; 62 of these athletes attempted to return to preinjury sport. Among the 62 who attempted RTS, 50 (81%) were successful, and 12 were unable to return due to limitations from their surgery. At follow-up, 112 of the overall cohort of 119 patients (94%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome, and 91% stated the surgery met or exceeded their expectations. In addition, 24% had subsequent ipsilateral knee operations after their index multiligament knee reconstruction. Older age at surgery and female sex were associated with worse IKDC scores at follow-up. Despite the severity of the injuries in our cohort, we found high levels of patient-reported function and a high rate of successful RTS in the competitive athletes. Older age and female sex were associated with worse patient-reported knee function at follow-up.

Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and structural allografts (SAs) are commonly used in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), yet their postoperative results remain uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether there were any differences in outcomes between patients who received these two grafts in ACDF. We comprehensively searched electronic databases up to August 2023. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials reported postoperative outcomes, including fusion, subsidence, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes through the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA)/modified JOA score following primary ACDF using SA or PEEK cage. The results are presented in odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven studies were included, with 1213 patients (788 receiving SAs and 425 receiving PEEK cages). Patients having SA had significantly higher fusion (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.27-2.67, p = 0.001) and lower subsidence (OR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.30-0.86, p = 0.01) rates when compared with the PEEK cage. There was no difference in revision rate between SA or PEEK cage (p = 0.88). Two grafts demonstrated similar clinical improvements in NDI (p = 0.31), VAS for the neck (p = 0.77) and arm pain (p = 0.22), and JOA/mJOA score (p = 0.99). SA demonstrates better fusion and lower subsidence rates than the PEEK cage in ACDF. Nevertheless, these two cages resulted in equally successful postoperative clinical performances.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Who Have Ostomies Have an Increased Risk of Revisions for Periprosthetic Joint Infection, but Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Do Not

BackgroundPatient comorbidities can lead to worse outcomes and increase the risk of revisions after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Sparse research is available on the effects of ostomies on postoperative outcomes. Our study aimed to assess whether patients who have ostomies, who underwent TKA or THA, have worse outcomes and increased rates of all-cause and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)-related revisions. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of THA and TKA patients who have and do not have a history of ostomy using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Patient demographics, ostomy diagnosis, 3-month emergency department visits and readmissions, and revisions were collected. A total of 126,414 THA and 216,037 TKA cases were included. Log-rank testing and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to account for covariates. ResultsIn total, 463 THA patients (0.4%) had ostomies. They had a longer length of stay (4.0 versus 3.1 days, P < 0.001) and were less likely to be discharged home (55.3 versus 62.2%, P = 0.01). They had higher rates of PJI-related revisions (1.9 versus 0.9%, P = 0.02) and had increased odds of PJI-related revision (OR [odds ratio] = 2.2, P = 0.02). Of TKA patients, 619 patients (0.3%) had an ostomy. They had a longer length of stay (3.6 versus 3.3 days, P = 0.02) and was less likely to be discharged home (49.4 versus 52.4%, P = 0.16). However, there was no difference in the rate (1.8 versus 1.4%, P = 0.49) or odds (OR = 1.2, P = 0.53) of PJI-related revision. ConclusionsTHA, but not TKA, patients who have ostomies have an increased risk of PJI-related revisions. The proximity of the surgical incision to the ostomy site may play a role in the risk of PJI in THA patients.

Differences in Success Rate of Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee Depending on the Applied Definition

BackgroundSuccess rates of two-stage exchange arthroplasty are subject to substantial variance in the literature. An explanation is the lack of a universally accepted definition of what constitutes treatment success for periprosthetic joint infection. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess success rates, applying four definitions to identify the one definition that best captures “true” success from both a clinical and patient-centered perspective. MethodsThis was a retrospective study investigating the outcome of a consecutive series of 78 chronic knee periprosthetic joint infections that were treated with a two-stage revision at a single center between 2017 and 2020. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to estimate success rates. ResultsAfter a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 25 to 60), 64 patients (82%) were reimplanted after a mean interim period of 90 days (range, 22 to 201). There was one patient (1%) lost to follow-up, and the overall mortality was 15% (n = 12). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to estimate treatment success at two and three years: implant survival was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82 to 97) and 87% (95% CI: 73 to 94), infection control was 90% (95% CI: 79 to 95) and 87% (95% CI: 73 to 93), success according to Delphi criteria was 88% (95% CI: 78 to 94), and success according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria was 65% (95% CI: 53 to 74) at both timepoints. ConclusionsSuccess rates were ranging between 65 and 93% depending on the applied definition, highlighting the need for universal success criteria. This variability mainly results from the differing approaches to patients who did not undergo reimplantation or passed away within a year of surgery. These patients exemplify cases of fatal treatment failures. Consequently, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria should be routinely employed to accurately report the “true” success rate.

Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated With Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing; however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well-studied. MethodsAn administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA + PPI, 2,622 THA + PPI, 3,103 TKA controls, and 2,622 THA controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05. ResultsPerioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort. ConclusionsPatients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.

A single-surgeon experience with the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow across 56 cases

BackgroundRecurrent instability continues to plague outcomes of elbow trauma. Adjuvant stabilization - whether internal or external - is intended to acutely stabilize the elbow and off-load the repair construct(s) during early mobilization. Our objective was to report clinical outcomes for a single surgeon consecutive series using the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) of the elbow. Further, we intend to describe technical points that have been gleaned from the experience which may provide guidance. MethodsA retrospective follow-up was performed for cases of elbow instability treated with the IJS (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, Florida, USA) from 2016-2023 with a minimum requirement of six months follow-up. Clinical outcomes and complications including recurrent instability were compiled. ResultsOf 87 potential cases, 56 met the inclusion criteria. Simple dislocations (30%) and terrible triad injury (21%) were the most common injury patterns. The mean MEPS was 81 and the mean DASH score was 22.5. Recurrent instability occurred in 5.3% of cases. The mean time to removal was 21.1 weeks. DiscussionOur utilization of the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow has evolved from simple dislocations to complex instability cases. Results demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and revision. The ability for early mobilization was a critical determinant for using an IJS in these cases. This advantage carried particular importance in cases that presented subacutely following an extended course of immobilization. Our protocol for removal timing is applied on a case-by-case basis and involves identification of sufficient rehabilitation and clinical stability.

Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Large Glenoid Defects Using the Stilting Technique and a Baseplate with Central Ingrowth Cage and Peripheral Locking Screws

Stilting is a novel technique used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with significant glenoid bone loss. This technique utilizes peripheral locking screws placed behind an unseated portion of the baseplate, to transmit forces from the baseplate to the cortical surface of the glenoid, without the need for bone grafting. The stilted screw, once locked, provides a fixed angle point of support for an unseated aspect of a baseplate. The primary advantages of this technique are reduced cost compared to a custom implant and reduced operative time compared to bone grafting. We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized, comparative cohort study of 41 patients underwent primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) using the Stilting Technique with the Exactech Equinoxe Reverse System (Gainesville, FL, USA) at a single, academic center from the years 2004-2021. Exclusion criteria included age under 18 or over 100, and oncologic or acute fracture RSA indications. Operative data was documented, including implant records, percent baseplate seating, and operative duration. Survivorship was compared among primary stilted-RSA (n=41), bone graft-RSA (n=42), and non-stilted/non-bone grafted RSA (n=1,032) within our institutional shoulder arthroplasty database. A radiographic examination of baseplate failure was also conducted across the study groups. Postoperative functional outcomes were compared in a matched analysis involving patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up between stilted patients and a non-stilted/non-bone grafted control group for primary RSA. All Stilted-RSA cases utilized metal augments and demonstrated a mean baseplate seating of 61% (range 45-75%). For stilted RSAs, survivorship was 100% and 92.6% at 2- and 5-years, compared to 98.3% and 94.6% for non-stilted/non-bone grafted and 96.3% and 79.5% for bone-grafted RSAs (p=0.042). At 5-years, the baseplate-related failure rates were greater in the stilted (7.4%) and the bone-grafted (9.3%) cohorts compared with the non-stilted/non-bone grafted cohort (1.1%, p<0.001). The mean time to baseplate failure was 30 months for stilted RSA. Functional outcomes for primary RSA were statistically similar between stilted and non-stilted patients, including range of motion, Constant, ASES, SST, UCLA, and SPADI scores. The stilted-RSA cohort exhibited noninferior revision and baseplate failure rates to that of bone-grafted RSA. This suggests that stilting may be a viable technique for patients undergoing primary RSA with significant glenoid deformity.