Rate Of Recurrent Instability Research Articles

Combined Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Has a Lower Risk of Recurrent Instability Requiring Revision Stabilization at 2 Years Than Either Procedure Alone

PurposeThe goal of this study was to utilize a large nationwide administrative database to directly compare usage, complications, and need for revision stabilization surgery after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPLFR), tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), and combined MPFLR and TTO (MPFLRTTO). MethodsThe PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for all reported cases of MPLFR, TTO, and combined MPFLR and TTO performed between 2010 and 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subsets from those cohorts with laterality-specific International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for patellar instability were used to evaluate 2-year incidence of infection, stiffness, fracture, and revision stabilization with MPFLR and/or TTO. Multiple Linear regression and chi-squared analysis were used to analyze incidence trends and to compare complication rates. ResultsA total of 70,070 patients were identified. MPFLR was found to be the most common procedure (73.1%) followed by TTO (19.2%) and then MPFLRTTO (7.6%). MPLFR was observed to have the lowest overall complication rate (5.4%), while both TTO (7.5%) and MPFLRTTO (7.1%) had higher complication rates (P<.001). MPFLR had the highest rate of revision stabilization surgery at 3.7% compared with TTO at 2.7% and MPFLRTTO which carried the lowest risk for revision at 2.4% (P<.001). ConclusionIsolated MPFLR is the most common modality used for patellar instability, with increasing prevalence and the lowest 2-year complication rate. Isolated tibial tubercle osteotomy was unchanged in its utilization and had the highest overall complication rate. Combined MPFLR and TTO increased the overall complication rate but had a lower 2-year rate of recurrent instability requiring revision than MPFLR alone.

A single surgeon experience with the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow across 56 cases

BackgroundRecurrent instability continues to plague outcomes of elbow trauma. Adjuvant stabilization - whether internal or external - is intended to acutely stabilize the elbow and off-load the repair construct(s) during early mobilization. Our objective was to report clinical outcomes for a single surgeon consecutive series using the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) of the elbow. Further, we intend to describe technical points that have been gleaned from the experience which may provide guidance. MethodsA retrospective follow-up was performed for cases of elbow instability treated with the IJS (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, Florida, USA) from 2016-2023 with a minimum requirement of six months follow-up. Clinical outcomes and complications including recurrent instability were compiled. ResultsOf 87 potential cases, 56 met the inclusion criteria. Simple dislocations (30%) and terrible triad injury (21%) were the most common injury patterns. The mean MEPS was 81 and the mean DASH score was 22.5. Recurrent instability occurred in 5.3% of cases. The mean time to removal was 21.1 weeks. DiscussionOur utilization of the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow has evolved from simple dislocations to complex instability cases. Results demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and revision. The ability for early mobilization was a critical determinant for using an IJS in these cases. This advantage carried particular importance in cases that presented subacutely following an extended course of immobilization. Our protocol for removal timing is applied on a case-by-case basis and involves identification of sufficient rehabilitation and clinical stability.

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Fixation Results in Similar Clinical Outcomes, Less Range of Motion Limitation but Poorer Quality of Reduction compared to Open Screw Fixation for Acute Large Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. MethodsThis study enrolled patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation (group A) or open screw fixation (group O) from January 2013 to June 2020 with a minimum follow-up of＞2 years. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Constant score, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability rate, and complications were recorded as clinical results. The quality of the postoperative reduction, reconstructed glenoid sizes, rate of fracture healing, and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were evaluated as radiological outcomes. ResultsThis retrospective study included 66 patients, including 37 in Group A and 29 in Group O with a mean follow-up of 46.9 (range, 24.3-94.2) months and a mean patient age of 46.8 (range, 21-69) years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. A significant ROM limitation in all planes was found in both groups and group O showed more limitations in external rotation at the side (ERs) (18° vs. 10°, P = 0.002). The reduction quality was better in group O (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reconstructed glenoid size (101.6% ± 4.6% vs. 100.6% ± 7.1%, P = 0.460) and the rate of OA progression (26.9% vs. 20%, P = 0.525). ConclusionArthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation achieved similar clinical outcomes, reconstructed glenoid sizes, and OA progression in patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. Arthroscopic suture fixation showed a poorer quality of reduction but less ERs limitations.

Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy in patellar instability: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

PurposeTo confirm which method provides lower rate of recurrent instability and superior clinical outcomes.MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for the trials involving one intervention or both for patellar instability: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). The postoperative Kujala score, Lysholm score, Tegner scores and the rate of recurrent instability (dislocation or subluxation) were analyzed as the primary clinical outcome parameters in a random or fixed effects meta-analysis.ResultsIn total, 43 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 2046 patients were analyzed. The overall mean age was 20.3 years (range, 9.5–60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years (range, 1–8 years). The mean Kujala scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 89.04 and 84.44, respectively. There was significant difference in Kujala scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.07–8.13; P = 0.01). The mean Lysholm scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 90.59 and 88.14, respectively. There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 2.45, 95%CI: -3.20-8.10; P = 0.40). The mean Tegner scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 5.30 and 4.88, respectively. There was no significant difference in Tegner scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 0.42, 95%CI: -0.39-1.23; P = 0.31). At final follow-up, the rates of recurrent instability in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 3% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.96–1.02; P = 0.4848).ConclusionMPFLR and MPFLR + TTO are effective and reliable treatments in the setting of patellofemoral instability. MPFLR seems to show a better performance in functional outcomes than MPFLR + TTO. Moreover, their rates of recurrent instability are very low, and no significant difference exists.

Poster 289: Impact of Graft Selection on Clinical Outcomes following Isolated MPFL Reconstruction in Adolescent and Young Adult Athletes

Objectives: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) commonly requires surgical intervention in adolescent and young adult athletes. However, the clinical impact of graft selection, which may vary amongst surgeons, has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was therefore to compare clinical outcomes, including recurrent instability reoperations and complications, of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), based on graft type. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients who underwent primary MPFLR surgery for PFI over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Collected data included demographic, clinical, and radiologic parameters of instability and post-operative clinical outcomes. Exclusion criteria included concomitant extensor realignment procedures (tibial tubercle osteotomy, patellar tendon transfer procedures) and factors that would alter routine surgical indications or technical approaches, such as fixed or syndromic PFI, osteochondral shear fractures undergoing fixation or &gt;1 cm in diameter, and prior ipsilateral knee surgery. Results: One-hundred and one patients (average age 15.2 years, 63% female), underwent primary isolated MPFLR with an average follow up time of 2.87 years. There were no significant differences in demographic and radiographic parameters between autograft and allograft, other than more semitendinosus grafts, increased number of pre-op dislocation events, and higher sulcus angle in autograft (Table 1). The autograft group had a higher rate of recurrent instability (41% vs 14%, p = 0.01) but no significant difference in return to sport, complications, and reoperations (Table 2). Reoperations for recurrent instability were performed in 9% of all patients (Table 3). Subgroup analysis of allograft tendon type demonstrated more dislocations and recurrent instability in gracilis than semitendinosus, though these differences were not statistically significant, and there was no difference in recurrent instability surgery or complications (Table 4). Conclusions: In adolescent and young adult athletes undergoing isolated primary MPFLR for PFI, allograft may be associated with decreased rates of recurrent instability compared to autograft. While trends towards higher recurrent instability were detected with gracilis allograft, compared to semitendinosus allograft, the precise role of allograft tendon type would benefit from future studies with larger sample size to better elucidate its impact on clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft Versus Autograft: A Matched-Cohort Analysis.

Disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) may lead to recurrent lateral patellar dislocation and patellofemoral chondral injury. Despite significant previous work investigating numerous performance parameters, the optimal graft choice for MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability remains unclear. To compare functional outcomes scores, subjective recurrent instability, and revision rates between autograft and allograft in MPFL reconstruction. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autograft between 2013 and 2018 were identified. A 2:1 comparison group of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with allograft was matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (BMI) (±3 kg/m2). Patient characteristics, preoperative radiograph measurements, and intraoperative data were compared between the groups, as were patient-reported outcome measures, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Subjective recurrent instability and revision rate were also compared between groups. The autograft group was composed of 30 patients (13 male, 17 female) with a mean age of 24.4 years and mean BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, and the allograft group was composed of 60 matched patients (25 male, 35 female) with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean BMI of 25.1 kg/m2. The autograft and allograft groups reported similar IKDC scores (73.0 vs 73.7; P = .678), Lysholm scores (77.5 vs 80.7; P = .514), SANE (72.0 vs 75.8; P = .236), and VAS pain (30.7 vs 26.6; P = .482), as well as similar rates of postoperative patellar subluxations (20.0% vs 19.3%; P = .867) and dislocations (10.0% vs 15.0%; P = .805). Both allograft and autograft were found to be viable options for MPFL reconstruction. There were no significant group differences in failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, pain, or complications between autograft and allograft MPFL reconstruction in this series.

Patient-reported Outcomes Following Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric First‐Time Patellar Dislocation

BackgroundPatellar instability is a common pediatric knee injury. The purpose of this study was to analyze PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) after non-operative treatment following a first-time pediatric patellar dislocation. MethodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, patients <18 years old between January 2012 and December 2019 with a first-time patellar dislocation were evaluated. From this cohort, we included all those patients who initially underwent non-operative management and followed up for at least 1 year. Measures of patellar height and patellofemoral dysplasia were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at the initial and follow-up visit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to determine the rate and risk factors for recurrence and the changes in PROMs. Results176 knees were included in the initial analysis, and 80 in the pre- and post-PROM analysis. There was a 41% rate of recurrence at a mean of 16.4 months of follow-up. In a multivariate logistic regression model, trochlear dysplasia (OR:4.53, 95%CI: 1.61–12.7, P=0.004), patella alta (OR:4.27, 95%CI: 1.76–10.3, P<0.001), and tibial tubercle trochlear groove (TT-TG) > 15mm (OR:2.49, 95%CI: 1.3–6.03, P<0.001) were significant risk factors for recurrence. Patients with or without recurrence showed significant improvements in PROMs at 1 year follow-up. However, both groups had mean scores below the population average. Regardless of recurrence or not, KOOS-Child QoL scores ranked the lowest among all PROM scores at the final follow-up. ConclusionsThe findings of this study provide further evidence of the high rate of recurrent instability and important associated risk factors to consider. We also found that despite the overall improvement in all PROM subscales 1 year following the initial episode, both recurrence and no-recurrence groups demonstrated lower mean PROM scores than normal values. Furthermore, quality of life subscales showed the smallest improvement among all patients. Our results may be used to counsel patients and families regarding expectations after first-time and recurrent patellar dislocations. Key conceptsPatellar instability is one of the most common pediatric sports injuries with a high risk of recurrence.(1)In the absence of other factors, a first-time patellar dislocation is generally treated non-operatively, but the long-term outcomes are not clear.(2)In this study, we found a high risk of recurrent dislocation. In addition, while the PROMs improved for all patients, even patients without evidence of further instability demonstrated patient-reported outcomes lower than the general population.(3)Future research may reveal subtle residual instability or other factors as the reason for the lower functional status and also compare these outcomes with operative reconstruction. Level of evidenceCase series, Level IV

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. Purpose: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. “Failure” was defined as a redislocation, and “overall recurrent instability” was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. Results: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios. Conclusion: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage. Registration: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage yields similar outcomes to open Latarjet for primary and revision stabilization in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss

Management of patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss (GBL), defined in this study as 20% GBL or less, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (ABR+R) to open Latarjet for subcritical GBL in primary or revision procedures. We hypothesized that ABR+R would yield higher rates of recurrent instability and reoperation compared to Latarjet in both primary and revision settings. A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing either arthroscopic ABR+R or an open Latarjet procedure. Patients with connective tissue disorders, critical GBL (>20%), <2year follow-up, or insufficient data were excluded. Recurrent instability and revision were the primary outcomes of interest. Additional outcomes of interest included subjective shoulder value, strength, and range of motion (ROM) RESULTS: One hundred eight patients (70 ABR+R, 38 Latarjet) were included with an average follow-up of 4.3±2.1years. In the primary and revision settings, similar rates of recurrent instability (Primary: P=.60; Revision: P=.28) and reoperation (Primary: P=.06; Revision: P=1.00) were observed between Latarjet and ABR+R. Primary ABR+R exhibited better subjective shoulder value, active ROM, and internal rotation strength compared to primary open Latarjet. However, no differences were observed in the revision setting. Similar rates of recurrent instability and reoperation in addition to comparable outcomes with no differences in ROM were found for ABR+R and Latarjet in patients with subcritical GBL in both the primary and revision settings. ABR+R can be a safe and effective procedure in appropriately selected patients with less than 20% GBL for both primary and revision stabilization.

Bony Bankart Lesion: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.

» Bony Bankart lesions are fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim, commonly associated with a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, and are diagnosed through radiological imaging and physical examination. Young male athletes playing contact sports are at highest risk of these injuries. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial because, if left untreated, recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss can occur. Both nonsurgical and surgical treatment options are available depending on the size of the lesion, with arthroscopic repair being the most common treatment method. After repair, patients typically have favorable outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability. This review aims to discuss the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of bony Bankart lesions.» Bony Bankart lesions are fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim and occur in up to 22% of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations.» Young men involved in contact sports or combat training are at the highest risk of sustaining bony Bankart lesions.» Diagnosis and treatment of bony Bankart lesions are essential to prevent long-term shoulder instability.» Bony Bankart lesions can be treated either nonoperatively or operatively (arthroscopic vs open repair), with the size of the glenoid defect being the primary determinant of treatment.

Comparison of Return to Sports and Competition After the Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents With Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: The use of isolated soft tissue repair versus bone block stabilization for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability in adolescents has no scientific evidence. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of adolescent patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic Bankart (iB) repair with those who underwent the arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure in addition to Bankart (BLB) repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 60 shoulders in adolescents (aged 13-18 years) were reviewed with a minimum 2 years’ follow-up: iB repair (n = 36) and arthroscopic Bankart repair with an additional Bristow-Latarjet procedure (BLB; n = 24). The characteristics of the patients in each group in terms of age at the first instability episode, age at surgery, hyperlaxity, participation in at-risk sports, and Instability Severity Index Score were comparable. The mean follow-up was longer in the iB group (7.7 vs 4.1 years, respectively), whereas the rates of patients engaged in competition and those with glenoid lesions were higher in the BLB group. The primary outcome measures were failure, defined as the recurrence of instability (clinical dislocation or subluxation), and return to sports. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 2-16 years). Results: At the last follow-up, the rate of recurrence was significantly higher in the iB group, with 22% (8/36) failures, than in the BLB group, with 8% (2/24) instability recurrences (P < .05). The rate of return to sports at the same level was significantly higher after the BLB repair than after iB repair (79% vs 47%, respectively; P < .001). No statistical difference was found in patient-reported outcome scores between treatment groups (P > .05). Although failures occurred early after the BLB repair, 88% of failures after iB repair occurred after 2 years. On multivariate analysis, adolescents in the iB group with >3 episodes of preoperative dislocation and shoulder hyperlaxity (external rotation >90°) had a 60% recurrence rate (P < .005). Conclusion: Adolescent patients undergoing the BLB repair had a lower rate of recurrent instability and higher rates of return to sports and competition than those undergoing iB repair. Patients with shoulder hyperlaxity (external rotation >90°) and >3 dislocations had an unacceptable failure rate of 60% after iB repair.

Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization in High School Football Players.

Destabilizing shoulder injuries are common in high school American football players; however, the rate of recurrent glenohumeral instability and return to play after arthroscopic labral stabilization surgery remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of recurrent instability on return to competitive high school football after arthroscopic shoulder labral stabilization and capsulorrhaphy procedures. It was hypothesized that the instability rate would be greater in players with more years of eligibility remaining (YER) to play at the high school level. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Consecutive male high school football players with at least 1 YER who sustained at least 1 anterior traumatic inseason shoulder instability episode and underwent arthroscopic stabilization between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Patients and/or families were contacted by phone to discuss (1) recurrent instability episodes and (2) return to competitive sport and/or recreational athletic activity. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square tests to compare recurrent shoulder instability with return to play and YER. A total of 45 football players aged 14 to 17 years were included, with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Most patients (60%) chose not to return to competitive football, due mainly to fear of recurrent injury. Overall, the recurrent instability rate was 15.6% (7/45). The instability rate in players who returned to football was 16.7%, with 66.7% requiring revision surgery. The instability rate in patients who did not return to football was 14.8%, with no revision procedures required. In players who returned to football, the instability rate in YER group 4 was significantly higher than that in YER groups 1 to 3 (42% vs 10.5%, respectively, P = .03), with each year of play conferring an additional 10% risk of reinjury. There was a significant difference in the type of recurrent instability in players who returned to any sport versus those who did not (P = .029). High school football players who returned to competitive play after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization surgery experienced a higher rate of recurrent instability that was dependent on their YER. Over half of the players chose not to return to football, with fear of reinjury being the most common reason.

O254: Open Latarjet Procedure in Athletes With a Minimum of 5 Years Follow Up: An Analysis of Factors Associated With Success

Abstract Introduction The open Latarjet (OL) procedure has shown excellent return to play (RTP) and low recurrence in athletes but there is limited published evidence for long term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of athletes 5-years post-operatively following the OL procedure. Methods A retrospective review of athletes who underwent OL under a single surgeon with a minimum of 5-year follow-up was performed. Multi-linear regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting postoperative satisfaction, and SSV level. Results 141 shoulder in 132 male athletes who underwent OL were included, with a mean age of 22.9 years, with mean follow-up of 71.5months. At final follow up, 93.7% were satisfied/very satisfied, and the mean SSV was 85.5. Overall, the rate of RTP was 91.3%, with 80.8% returning at the same level at a mean of 7.3months. There were 9 athletes (6.4%) who experienced further dislocation, all during collision sports. In total 10 (7.1%) athletes had a further operation, of which 3 (2.4%) were for recurrent instability. The mean SIRSI score was 82.1 ± 27.3, the mean Rowe score was 85.4, while the mean VAS score was 2.1. Linear regression revealed the SIRSI, VAS and Rowe score as well as RTP were significantly associated with SSV score. 90.6% of athletes reported they would undergo the procedure again were it required. Conclusion There was very high rate of satisfaction, with excellent patient-reported outcomes, low rates of recurrent instability and a high rate of return to play among athletes.

P258: Does The Latarjet Procedure For Anterior Shoulder Instability Put Off-Track Lesions Back On Track: A Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction The Latarjet procedure is commonly used in the treatment of shoulder instability for high risk patients. The glenoid track is widened by fixing the coracoid to the anterior glenoid. In the presence of bipolar bone loss there is concern that the Latarjet procedure may not adequately address off-track lessions.The aim of this systematic review to assess whether the Latarjet procedure is sufficient to convert 'off-track' Hill-Sachs lesions back to 'on-track'. Methods A systematic review of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed in October 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of post-operative 'on-track' lesions and of recurrent instability. Changes in glenoid diameter and Hill-Sachs lesion interval were also recorded. Results A total of 5 studies were included with 187 patients. Weighted mean age was 29.2 ± 2.2 years old and 90.8% of patients were male. The mean follow-up time was 26.8 months. All patients had off-track Hill-Sachs lesions pre-operatively. 88.6% of cases were converted to on-track lesions. The overall post-operative instability rate was 4.8%. The recurrence rate was significantly greater for off-track lesions (33.3%) than for on-track lesions (4.2%), odds ratio 11.4 (3.5-37.0). The weighted mean post-operative glenoid diameter change was 8.4 ± 5.8mm. The weighted mean Hill-Sachs lesion interval was 25.6 ± 4.5mm. Conclusion The Latarjet procedure results in the majority of Hill-Sachs lesions being converted to on-track lesions. However, due to bipolar bone loss approximately 1/9 cases will remain off track. In cases of failure to return on-track, there is an unacceptably high rate of recurrent instability (33.3%).

Simultaneous MPFL reconstruction and guided growth resultin low rates of recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Implant-mediated guided growth (IMGG) is used to address coronal plane deformity in skeletally immature patients. Few studies have reported on IMGG and simultaneous medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for paediatric patients with concurrent genu valgum and patellofemoral instability (PFI). This study aimed to report on the outcomes of these simultaneous procedures. This was a retrospective review of paediatric patients undergoing simultaneous MPFL reconstruction and IMGG between 2016 and 2023. Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA)and mechanical axis deviation (MAD) were measured on full-length hip-to-ankle plain radiographs. Measurements were taken preoperatively, prior to implant removal and/or at final follow-up with minimum 1-year clinical follow-up. A total of 25 extremities in 22 patients (10 female) underwent simultaneous IMGG and MPFL reconstruction. The mean age at surgery was 12.6 ± 1.7 years. The mean duration of implant retention was 18.6 ± 11.3 months. Nineteen extremities (76%) underwent implant removal by final follow-up. Preoperative HKA corrected from a mean of 5.8 ± 2.3° to -0.8 ± 4.5° at implant removal or final follow-up (p < 0.001), with mLDFA and MAD similarly improving (both p < 0.001). HKA corrected a mean of 0.7 ± 0.9° per month, while mLDFA and MAD corrected a mean of 0.5 ± 0.6°/month and 2 ± 3 mm/month, respectively. At the time of implant removal or final follow-up, 88% of patients demonstrated alignment within 5°of neutral. Only one extremity experienced subsequent PFI (4%). For 14 patients who underwent implant removal with further imaging at a mean of 7.8 ± 4.9 months, only one patient (7%) had a valgus rebound to an HKA > 5°. Simultaneous MPFL reconstruction and IMGG provided successful correction of lower extremity malalignment with only one recurrence of PFI. This approach is a reliable surgical option for skeletally immature patients with genu valgum and PFI. Level 4 case series.

Medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstruction and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction have no significant differences in clinical outcomes for treatment of lateral patellar instability: a matched-cohort study

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament reconstruction (MQTFLR) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) among patients with recurrent lateral patellar instability. MethodsA retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted involving patients who underwent MQTFLR or MPFLR with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) from 2019 to 2021. Subjects were matched 1:1 on age, concomitant osteochondral allograft (OCA), concomitant TTO, and follow-up time. Measured outcomes included 90-day complications, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) knee pain, return to sport/work, Kujala score, Tegner score, and MPFL-Return to Sport after Injury (MPFL-RSI) score. Outcomes were compared between groups using Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. ResultsTen MQTFLR patients (mean age 28.7 years, 80% female, mean follow-up 19.7 months) and ten MPFLR patients (mean age 29.1 years, 90% female, mean follow-up 28.3 months) were included in the study. One MQTFLR patient (10%) and three MPFLR patients (30%) underwent reoperation for postoperative arthrofibrosis. Postoperative VAS resting pain was not significantly different between the groups (MQTFLR mean 1.1, MPFLR mean 0.6, p ​= ​0.31). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrent subluxations (MQTFLR 20%, MPFLR 0%, p ​= ​0.47), return to sport (MQTFLR 50%, MPFLR 75%, p ​= ​0.61), return to work (MQTFLR 100%, MPFLR 88%, p ​= ​1.00), or MPFL-RSI pass rate (MQTFLR 75% vs. MPFLR 38%, p ​= ​0.31). ConclusionThere were no significant differences in knee pain and function, return to work, and rates of recurrent patellar instability between patients who underwent MQTFLR versus MPFLR, though these results should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and potential selection bias. Level of EvidenceIII.

A Smaller Tibiotalar Sector Is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Anterolateral Ankle Instability after a Modified Broström-Gould Procedure.

Several demographic and clinical risk factors for recurrent ankle instability have been described. The main objective of this study was to investigate the potential influence of morphologic characteristics of the ankle joint on the occurrence of recurrent instability and the functional outcomes following a modified Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Fifty-eight ankles from 58 patients (28 males and 30 females) undergoing a modified Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability between January 2014 and July 2021 were available for clinical and radiological evaluation. Based on the preoperative radiographs, the following radiographic parameters were measured: talar width (TW), tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, talar height (TH), talar radius (TR), tibiotalar sector (TTS), and tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle. The history of recurrent ankle instability and the functional outcome using the Karlsson Score were assessed after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Recurrent ankle instability was reported in 14 patients (24%). The TTS was significantly lower in patients with recurrent ankle instability (69.8 degrees vs 79.3 degrees) (P < .00001). The multivariate logistic regression model confirmed the TTS as an independent risk factor for recurrent ankle instability (OR = 1.64) (P = .003). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that patients with a TTS lower than 72 degrees (=low-TTS group) had an 82-fold increased risk for recurrent ankle instability (P = .001). The low-TTS group showed a significantly higher rate of recurrent instability (58% vs 8%; P = .0001) and a significantly lower Karlsson score (65 points vs 85 points; P < .00001). A smaller TTS was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrent ankle instability and led to poorer functional outcomes after a modified Broström-Gould procedure. Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, "B"; no brace, "NB"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all p > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], p = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], p = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], p = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, p = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, p = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

To Remplissage or Not to Remplissage Part 1: Prognostic Factors Influencing Recurrent Shoulder Instability in High-Risk Individuals with On-Track Shoulders Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization

Objectives: Recent studies have shown that a subset of on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL), defined as near-track lesions, may have a high risk of failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder instability among patients with on-track HSL who underwent primary ABR with and without remplissage in the setting of numerous risk factors highlighted in recent literature. We hypothesized that primary ABR with remplissage (ABR+R) would lower postoperative rates of recurrent shoulder instability, particularly for “high-risk” patients defined as “near-track” lesions, hyperlaxity, younger age, contact athletes, and &gt;1 preoperative instability episodes. Methods: Prospectively collected data was retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients aged 14-40 years who underwent either ABR or ABR+R between 2013 and 2021 for anterior glenohumeral instability. Glenoid bone loss, Hills-Sachs Interval (HSI), glenoid track (GT), and distance-to-dislocation (DTD) values (DTD = GT-HSI) were determined via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, “near-track” lesions are a subset of on-track lesions with a DTD from 0 – 10mm. Capsuloligamentous laxity (i.e., hyperlaxity) was defined as external rotation greater than 85 degrees and/or grade 2+ posterior and inferior load-and-shift on examination under anesthesia. Recurrent shoulder instability was defined as recurrent dislocation and/or subjective subluxation postoperatively. Patients were excluded if the indexed surgery was a revision procedure, &lt; 2-year follow-up, or glenoid bone loss (GBL) &gt;20%. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine predictors of recurrent shoulder instability and reoperation. Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients were included for analysis (ABR: 116 | ABR+R: 39) with an average age of 21.6 ± 6.2 years and an average follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.0 years (range: 2.0 – 8.7 yrs). Overall, 30 patients (19%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability postoperatively (4.3 per 100 person-years), and 20 (13%) underwent secondary surgery (2.9 per 100 person-years) for revision stabilization. Among the 116 patients who underwent primary ABR only, 27 (23.3%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability, compared with only three of the 39 ABR+R patients (7.7%). Risk factors assessed included: age, gender, sport, number of preoperative instability episodes, shoulder laxity, GBL, and DTD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age (p=0.003), increased shoulder laxity (p=0.010), 2+ episodes of preoperative instability episodes (p=0.009), and a lower DTD (p=0.046) were independent risk factors for recurrent shoulder instability postoperatively. However, contact athlete status was not identified as a significant predictor of recurrent shoulder instability. According to multivariate results, patients who underwent primary ABR only were roughly 9-times more likely to experience recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 8.7, p=0.002) and 7-times more likely to undergo reoperation (HR:6.8, p=0.019) than those who underwent primary ABR+R. When considering patients with three or more risk factors (i.e., “near-track” lesions, hyperlaxity, age &lt; 25, or 2+ preoperative instability episodes), 9 of 12 ABR patients (75%) and 2 of 16 ABR+R (13%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability (p = 0.001), Table 1. Survival rates for ABR only versus ABR+R for patients with three or more risk factors are plotted in Figure 1 using Kaplan-Meier survival plots. Conclusions: Arthroscopic primary Bankart repair with remplissage may be an effective approach for decreasing the likelihood of recurrent shoulder instability and the need for secondary surgery among patients with on-track HSL. This surgical approach is especially beneficial for patients with lower DTD, increased shoulder laxity, younger age, or 2+ preoperative instability episodes in a dose-dependent manner. Those with higher risks of recurrence may benefit significantly more with the addition of a remplissage than those with fewer risk factors.

To Remplissage or not to Remplissage Part 2: Recurrent Instability After Primary Stabilization Surgery (RIPSS) Risk Tool Assesses Preoperative Failure Rates in On-track Shoulders Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization with or without Remplissage Augmentation

Objectives: Given the high rates of recurrent instability following the initial arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), it is crucial to provide recommendations for appropriate surgical interventions for patients at a higher risk of experiencing recurring instability. In Part 1 of the study, it was discovered that on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL) with specific prognostic factors (i.e., younger age, increased shoulder laxity, lower DTD, and 2+ preoperative instability events) were associated with a greater risk of failure. Therefore, the objective of Part 2 was to develop a risk assessment tool that takes into account significant prognostic factors for recurrent shoulder instability following primary ABR and evaluate the role of remplissage augmentation given a patient’s risk profile. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of consecutive patients aged 14-40 who underwent either ABR (arthroscopic Bankart repair) or ABR+R (ABR with remplissage) procedures between 2013 and 2021 for anterior glenohumeral instability. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the values of glenoid bone loss, Hills-Sachs Interval (HSI), glenoid track (GT), and distance-to-dislocation (DTD). On-track lesions have a distance-to-dislocation (DTD) value greater than zero. In addition, within the category of on-track lesions, there is a subset known as “near-track” lesions, with a DTD ranging from 0 to 10 mm. Capsuloligamentous laxity scores were categorized according to hyperlaxity status, defined as external rotation greater than 85 degrees and/or grade 2+ posterior and inferior load-and-shift on examination under anesthesia. Recurrent shoulder instability was defined as recurrent dislocation and/or subjective subluxation postoperatively. Patients were excluded if the indexed surgery was a revision procedure, &lt; 2-year follow-up, or glenoid bone loss (GBL) &gt;20%. A final multivariate survival analysis was constructed using categorical prognostic factors (i.e., patient age, “near-track” status, hyperlaxity, and 2+ preoperative instability episodes) identified in Part 1, while adjusting for GBL. Although contact athlete status was not identified as a significant predictor of recurrent shoulder instability in Part 1, the final model stratified by contact athlete status given its established importance in prior literature. Multivariate hazard ratio estimates were utilized to create a risk assessment tool and correlated with patient-specific risk estimates via post-estimation analysis. Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients were included for analysis (ABR: 116 | ABR+R: 39) with an average age of 21.6 ± 6.2 years and an average follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.0 years (range: 2.0 – 8.7 yrs). Patients with near-track lesions had a three-fold higher risk of recurrent instability (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.5, p = 0.03) compared to on-track HSL with DTD &gt; 10mm. Individuals with evidence of hyperlaxity exhibited a five-fold increased risk (HR: 5.4, p=0.03) relative to patients without hyperlaxity. Younger patient groups had twice the risk of recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 2.2, p=0.003) compared to older adjacent groups. Patients with two or more preoperative recurrent instability episodes faced a four-times greater risk (HR: 4.2, p=0.004) for recurrent shoulder instability compared to patients who experienced a single instability event preoperatively. Lastly, patients who underwent primary ABR only had almost 10-times greater risk of recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 9.5, p=0.002) than those who underwent primary ABR+R. The Recurrent Instability after Primary Shoulder Stabilization (RIPSS) risk assessment score considers patient age, near-track status, hyperlaxity, preoperative instability episodes, and surgical technique (ABR vs. ABR+R) as important prognostic indicators, Table 2. The RIPSS score was created with risk stratifying subgroups: Low-risk (0 – 2), Moderate-risk (3 – 6), High-risk (7 – 9), and Extreme-risk (10+). Figure 1 illustrates a strong correlation between patient RIPSS scores with patient-specific hazard ratio estimates derived from the multivariate Cox regression modeling computed in “To Remplissage or not to Remplissage Part 1”. According to RIPSS score subgroups, recurrent shoulder instability rates range from 4.3% among low-risk groups to 54.6% among extreme-risk groups, Figure 1. Conclusions: Patients with a low-risk RIPSS score without ABR+R may not benefit from remplissage augmentation. Their risk for recurrent instability would remain low despite the addition of remplissage. However, patients with a high- or extreme-risk RIPSS score prior to considering ARB+R would likely benefit from remplissage supplementation. The RIPSS score may be an effective risk assessment tool that may help identify patients who may benefit from a primary Bankart repair with remplissage augmentation. The risk assessment tool developed may optimize surgical treatment and allow physicians to determine patient risk scores with and without remplissage augmentation.