Postoperative In-hospital Mortality Rates Research Articles

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Real-world evidence from a large-scale inpatient database in Japan.

Robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) has been widely performed throughout Japan since it became insured in 2018. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of RDG and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer using real-world data. A total of 4161 patients who underwent LDG (n = 3173) or RDG (n = 988) for gastric cancer between April 2018 and October 2022 were identified through the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database, which covers 42 national university hospitals. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital mortality rate. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complication rates, time to diet resumption, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). In-hospital mortality and postoperative complication rates in the RDG group were comparable with those in the LDG group (0.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.000, and 8.7% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.693, respectively). RDG was associated with a longer duration of anesthesia (325 vs. 262 min, p < 0.001), similar time to diet resumption (3 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), and shorter postoperative LOS (10 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001) compared with LDG. RDG was performed safely and provided shorter postoperative LOS, since it became covered by insurance in Japan.

Clinical features and risk factors of postoperative in-hospital mortality following surgical repair of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection

BackgroundTo investigate the clinical features of patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) and analyze the risk factors affecting postoperative in-hospital mortality rate.MethodsThe demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed from 118 AAD patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from June 2016 to April 2019. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were grouped into death and survival groups. The risk factors affecting postoperative in-hospital death were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe male to female ratio in the patients was 3.8:1 and the mean age was 50.11 ± 9.91 years. The patient’s main comorbidities were hypertension (70.33%) and coronary heart disease (10.17%). The main symptoms included chest pain and back pain (72.89%). The highest incidence of complications was pericardial effusion (48.31%), followed by pleural effusion (22.88%). The mean systolic blood pressure, white blood cell count and D-dimer in the patients were over the ranges of normal people. The incidences of cardiac and renal insufficiency were 18.64% and 16.95% respectively, and the postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 12.71%. Univariable analysis showed that age, renal insufficiency, cardiac insufficiency, D-dimer level, cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, blood transfusion volume and postoperative hemostasis were significant factors leading to the death (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age > 65, renal insufficiency, cardiopulmonary bypass time ≥ 250 min and postoperative hemostasis were independent risk factors for the death (P < 0.05).ConclusionsAAD patients frequently have underlying diseases with pain as the main symptom. Age > 65 years, renal insufficiency, cardiopulmonary bypass time ≥ 250 min and postoperative hemostasis are significantly risk factors for postoperative mortality.

Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Analysis of 600 cases of pancreatoduodenectomy patients over a 10-year period at a single institution

BackgroundAlthough postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common and critical complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), effective strategies to prevent POPF have not yet been completely developed. Because appropriate management of POPF is important to reduce the mortality rate after PD, in this study we aimed to evaluate our approach for the management of POPF after PD, including the postoperative course. MethodsThis retrospective study included 605 consecutive patients who underwent PD at our hospital between 2010 and 2020. All patients who developed POPF were first managed conservatively, with drainage tubes placed during surgery retained to manage POPF. In cases wherein conservative treatment was unsuccessful, open drainage, followed by continuous negative pressure and continuous irrigation, was used. For open drainage, the surgical wound was opened bluntly (approximate length, 5 cm) under local anesthesia, and the fluid was directly and completely drained. ResultsThe prevalence of POPF of grades B and C was 15.4% (n = 93) and 0.33% (n = 2), respectively. Of these patients, 1 required reoperation, 43 recovered with conservative management only, 47 required open drainage, and 4 required image-guided percutaneous drainage. Postoperative hemorrhage with a pseudoaneurysm was identified in 3 (0.66%) patients. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was low (n = 1, 0.16%). The rate of successful POPF management was 98.9%. ConclusionBased on our high success rate in POPF management, we consider open drainage to be a safe primary management method for POPF.

PET/CT-tailored treatment of locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: a report on the feasibility of the multicenter GastroPET study.

Background:Perioperative chemotherapy is a recommended treatment approach for localised oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma, but not all patients respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Early identification of non-responders and treatment adaptation in the preoperative period could improve outcomes. GastroPET is a national, multicentre phase II trial evaluating a 18FDG-PET/CT-guided preoperative treatment strategy with the R0 resection rate as a primary endpoint. Here, we report on the accuracy of the methodology, the feasibility of the study design and patient safety data after enrolment of the first 63 patients.Methods:Patients with locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert I – III) stage Ib–IIIc underwent baseline 18FDG-PET/CT scanning and re-evaluation after 14 days of oxaliplatinum-5FU-(docetaxel) chemotherapy. Responders were defined by a ⩾ 35% decrease in tumour FDG standardised uptake value (SUV)average from baseline. Responders continued with the same chemotherapy for 2 to 3 months prior to surgery. PET-non-responders switched to preoperative chemoradiotherapy [weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions)]. Here, we aim to confirm the feasibility of FDG-PET-based response assessment in a multicenter setting and to compare local versus central reading. In addition, we report on the feasibility of the study conduct and patient safety data.Results:A total of 64 patients received baseline and sequential 14-day 18FDG-PET/CT scanning. And, 63 were allocated to the respective treatment arm according to PET-response [35 (56%) responders and 28 (44%) non-responders]. The concordance of local versus central reading of SUV changes was 100%. Until the date of this analysis, 47 patients (28 responders and 19 non-responders) completed surgery. Postoperative complications of grade ⩾ 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE Version 5.0) were reported in five responders (18%; 95% CI: 7.9–36%) and two non-responders (11%; 95% CI: 2.9–31%), with no statistical difference (p = 0.685). One patient in each arm died after surgery, leading to a postoperative in-hospital mortality rate of 4.3% (2/47 patients; 95% CI: 1.2–14%).Conclusion:Local and central FDG-SUV quantification and PET-response assessment showed high concordance. This confirms the accuracy of a PET-response-guided treatment algorithm for locally advanced oesophago-gastric junction cancer in a multicenter setting. Preoperative treatment adaptation revealed feasible and safe for patients.

Preoperative chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (POET): Long-term results of a controlled randomised trial

BackgroundResults of the PreOperative therapy in Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma Trial (POET) showed some benefits when including radiotherapy into the preoperative treatment. This article is reporting long-term results of this phase III study. Patients and methodsPatients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (Siewert types I–III) were eligible. Randomisation was done to chemotherapy (group A) or induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT; group B) followed by surgery. ResultsThe primary end-point of the study was overall survival at 3 years. The study was closed early after 119 patients having been randomised and were eligible. Local progression-free survival after tumour resection was significantly improved by CRT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37; 0.16–0.85, p = value 0.01) and 20 versus 12 patients were free of local tumour progression at 5 years (p = 0.03). Although the rate of postoperative in-hospital mortality was somewhat higher with CRT (10.2% versus 3.8%, p = 0.26), more patients were alive at 3 and 5 years after CRT (46.7% and 39.5%) compared with chemotherapy (26.1% and 24.4%). Thus, overall survival showed a trend in favour of preoperative CRT (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–1.01, p = 0.055). ConclusionAlthough the primary end-point overall survival of the study was not met, our long-term follow-up data suggest a benefit in local progression-free survival when radiotherapy was added to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction.

EXPERIENCE OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER WITH LIVER METASTASES

AIM. To compare results surgery ofcolorectal cancer with resection or radiofrequency thermoablation of liver metastasesi. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty seven patients were included into study. In first group (n=24) liver resection was performed simultaneously with primary tumor surgery; in the second group (n=33) patients underwent local thermal destruction of metastases. RESULTS. Postoperative complications developed in 2 (8,3%) patients of group I and 4 (12,1%) in group II. In group II, the postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 5,8% (2 patients) due to failure of colonic anastomosis withfecal peritonitis. The disease-free period in group I was 14,4±3,2 months. The 3-year survival rate was 39%, with the median survival of 32,5 months. In group II, the 3-year survival rate was 27%. CONCLUSION. Resectable liver metastases should undergo resection, if there are no adverse factors. This study shows that liver resection is a more effective treatment than radiofrequency thermoablation.

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score as predictor of survival of patients with digestive system cancer who have undergone surgical resection.

Comorbidities have considerable effects on survival outcomes. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to examine the association between age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score and postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients with digestive system cancer who have undergone surgical resection of their cancers. Using electronic hospitalization summary reports, we identified 315,464 patients who had undergone surgery for digestive system cancer in top-rank (Grade 3A) hospitals in China between 2013 and 2015. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to evaluate the effect of ACCI score on postoperative mortality, with adjustments for sex, type of resection, anesthesia methods, and caseload of each healthcare institution. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate in the study cohort was 1.2% (3,631/315,464). ACCI score had a positive graded association with the risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality for all cancer subtypes. The adjusted HRs for postoperative in-hospital mortality scores ≥ 6 for esophagus, stomach, colorectum, pancreas, and liver and gallbladder cancer were 2.05 (95% CI: 1.45–2.92), 2.00 (95% CI: 1.60–2.49), 2.54 (95% CI: 2.02–3.21), 2.58 (95% CI: 1.68–3.97), and 4.57 (95% CI: 3.37–6.20), respectively, compared to scores of 0–1. These findings suggested that a high ACCI score is an independent predictor of postoperative in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients with digestive system cancer who have undergone surgical resection.

Pneumonectomy for benign disease: indications and postoperative outcomes, a nationwide study.

Pneumonectomy for benign disease is rare but is thought to have a higher more postoperative morbidity and mortality than when performed for lung cancer. We questioned this by assessing and analysing indications and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent this type of resection. We used Epithor, the French national thoracic database including 91 public and private institutions with more than 220 000 procedures. We prospectively collected data of 5975 patients who underwent pneumonectomy between January 2003 and June 2013. The 321 patients (5.4%) who underwent pneumonectomy (n = 201) or completion pneumonectomy (n = 120) for benign disease were compared with those treated for malignant disease. The patients' mean age was 55.2 years (53.5; 56.8) for benign indications vs 61.6 years (61.4; 61.9) for malignant disease; the sex ratio was 1.8 (207 males) and 4 (4543 males), respectively; 53% of patients (n = 169) had an American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score of ≥3 vs 29% (n = 1598) for malignant disease. For benign disease, most frequent indications were infection or abscess (n = 114, 37.1%), post-tuberculosis destroyed lung (n = 47, 15.3%), aspergillosis or aspergilloma (n = 33, 10.7%), bronchiectasis (n = 41, 13.3%), haemorrhage (n = 26, 8.5%) and benign tumour (n = 20, 6.5%). Complications occurred in 53% (n = 170) of patients and the postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 22.1% (n = 71). These results were significantly worse than those for malignant indications: 38.9% (n = 2198) of morbidity (P < 0.0001) and 5.1% (n = 288) of in-hospital mortality (P < 0.0001). For benign disease, there was no difference in fistula formation regarding side (P = 0.07) or type of resection (P = 0.6). Morbidity was higher for completion pneumonectomy: 62.5 vs 47.3% (P = 0.008). Mortality was significantly higher in case of resection for infection or abscess (P = 0.01) and for haemorrhage (P = 0.002). Emergency procedures were associated with worse postoperative outcomes (P < 0.0001). Pneumonectomy for benign disease achieves cure with very high levels of morbidity and mortality. This type of surgical treatment should be considered as a salvage procedure.

Evaluation of Modified Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Choledochocystolithiasis

The incidence of complicated choledochocystolithiasis is increasing with the aging of society in Japan. We evaluated the utility of our prediction rule modified estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (mE-PASS) in predicting postoperative adverse events in patients with choledochocystolithiasis. A total of 4,329 patients who underwent elective surgery for choledochocystolithiasis in 44 referral hospitals between April 1987 and April 2007 were analyzed for mE-PASS along with postoperative events. The discrimination power of mE-PASS was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The correlation between ordinal and interval variables was quantified by the Spearman rank correlation (ρ). The ratio of observed-to-estimated mortality rates (OE ratio) was used as a metric of surgical quality. Postoperative in-hospital mortality rates were 0 % (0/3,442) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 0.19 % (1/521) for open cholecystectomy, 1.6 % (1/63) for laparoscopic choledochotomy, 1.1 % (3/264) for open choledochotomy, and 5.1 % (2/39) for plasty or resection of the common bile duct. mE-PASS demonstrated a high discrimination power to predict in-hospital mortality; AUC, 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 0.96, 0.94-0.99. The predicted mortality rates significantly correlated with the severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.278, p < 0.0001) and length of hospital stay (ρ = 0.479, p < 0.0001). The OE ratios (95 % CI) improved slightly over time; 1.5 (0.25-9.0) between 1987 and 2000, and 0.40 (0.078-2.1) between 2001 and 2007. The present study suggests that mE-PASS can predict postoperative risks in patients who have undergone choledochocystolithiasis. mE-PASS may be useful in surgical decision making and evaluating the quality of care.

Risk Adjustment as Basis for Rational Benchmarking: The Example of Colon Carcinoma

The results of resection of colorectal carcinoma can vary greatly from one hospital to another. However, this does not necessarily reflect differences in the quality of treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare various tools for the risk-adjusted assessment of treatment results after resection of colorectal carcinoma within the context of hospital benchmarking. On the basis of a data pool provided by a multicentric observation study of patients with colon cancer, the postoperative in-hospital mortality rates at two high-volume hospitals ("A" and "B") were compared. After univariate comparison, risk-adjusted comparison of postoperative mortality was performed by logistic regression analysis (LReA), propensity-score analysis (PScA), and the CR-POSSUM score. Postoperative complications were compared by LReA and PScA. Although postoperative mortality differed significantly (P = 0.041) in univariate comparison of hospitals A and B (2.9% vs. 6.4%), no significant difference was found by LReA or PScA. Similarly, the observed mortality at these did not differ significantly from the mortality estimated by the CR-POSSUM score (hospital A, 2.9%/4.9%, P = 0.298; hospital B, 6.4%/6.5%, P = 1.000). Significant differences were seen in risk-adjusted comparison of most postoperative complications (by both LReA and PScA), but there were no differences in the rates of relaparotomy or anastomotic leakage that required surgery. For the hard outcome variable "postoperative mortality," none of the three risk adjustment procedures showed any difference between the hospitals. The CR-POSSUM score can be regarded as the most practicable tool for risk-adjusted comparison of the outcome of colon-carcinoma resection in clinical benchmarking.

Evaluation of palliative surgical procedures in unresectable pancreatic cancer

To update our experience with palliative surgical procedures in unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, the records of 297 patients surgically treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were reviewed. Between October 1983 and November 1989, 117 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy as a single procedure: 24 patients had gastric bypass, 38 biliary bypass, and 118 both gastric and biliary bypass. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4 per cent. Overall morbidity was 29.7 per cent; the morbidity rate in patients with a double bypass was 29.7 per cent. Median (s.e.m.) survival was 231(20.3) days. Statistical analysis showed a significantly increased risk of morbidity in patients who underwent one therapeutic and one prophylactic bypass. Survival was decreased in patients who had a therapeutic gastric bypass (median(s.e.m.) survival 136(70.2) days) or a combination of two therapeutic bypasses (median(s.e.m.) survival 93(85.9) days). These data emphasize the poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who cannot be resected. The need for therapeutic double bypass is a bad prognostic indicator, and a prophylactic bypass added to a therapeutic bypass increases morbidity without prolonging survival.

Surgical management of carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus: analysis of 209 cases.

Free jejunal transfer has become the standard technique for reconstruction of the pharynx and hypopharynx, especially with proximal neoplastic lesions, whereas gastric tube interposition is the technique of choice for reconstruction of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus when resection extends below the thoracic inlet. Surgical ablation is a viable option for advanced hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal neoplasms, with stomach interposition a safe and preferred method of reconstruction. Retrospective analysis. University hospital that is a regional referral institution for esophageal cancer treatment and complex digestive reconstructions after esophagectomy. We reviewed the records of 209 patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy between May 1982 and July 1999. The majority of patients had advanced cancer: hypopharyngeal in 131 cases and cervical esophageal in 78 cases. Pharyngolaryngectomy and total esophagectomy with pharyngogastric anastomoses (n = 127); pharyngolaryngectomy, cervical esophagectomy, and reconstruction with free jejunal transplant (n = 77); and pharyngolaryngectomy and total esophagectomy with pharyngocolic anastomoses (n = 5). Postoperative mortality and morbidity, long-term survival, and prognostic factors influencing survival. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8% (10 patients), with a postoperative morbidity rate of 38.3%. Alimentary continuity was achieved using the stomach (127 patients), colon (5 patients), or free jejunal autograft (77 patients). The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 62% and 24%, respectively. There was no significant difference with regard to the survival between gastric transposition and free jejunal autograft, but there were fewer complications in the gastric pull-up group (33% vs 47%, P<.05). The significant adverse factors affecting survival were tumor cervical localization, postoperative complications, disease stages pT3 and pT4 for the cervical esophageal tumors, microscopic pharyngeal penetration, or incomplete resection. The significant beneficial factors were tumor hypopharyngeal localization and postoperative radiotherapy. Surgical ablation is a viable option for advanced hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal neoplasms, with stomach interposition the preferred method of reconstruction. Although the prognosis is poor, satisfactory short-term palliation can be achieved. The significant adverse factors affecting survival should be taken into account to select the candidates for surgery.

Predicting adverse postoperative outcomes in patients aged 80 years or older.

The identification of reversible factors that are associated with postoperative morbidity in geriatric surgical patients is critical to improving perioperative outcomes in such patients. Our study aimed to compare the relative importance of intraoperative versus preoperative factors in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes in geriatric patients. Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing noncardiac surgery in 1995. Two University of California, San Francisco, teaching hospitals--Moffitt/Long and Mount Zion medical centers. All men and women 80 years of age or older undergoing noncardiac surgery. Medical records of all patients were reviewed to measure predefined pre- and intraoperative risk factors and postoperative outcomes. Predictors of postoperative outcomes were identified by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Three hundred sixty-seven patients were studied. The most prevalent preoperative risk factors were a history of hypertension and coronary artery, pulmonary, and neurologic diseases. Postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6%, and 25% of patients developed adverse postoperative outcomes, of which neurological and cardiovascular complications were the leading causes of morbidity (15% and 12%, respectively). By multivariate logistic regression, a history of neurological disease (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 - 6.9, P = .0001), congestive heart failure (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 - 5.3, P = .004), and a history of arrhythmia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 - 4.3, P = .01) increased the odds of adverse postoperative events. The only intraoperative event shown to be predictive of postoperative complications was the use of vasoactive agents (OR 8.0, 95% CI 1.6 - 40.5, P = .009). In this group of geriatric surgical patients, the overall postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6%, and 25% of the patients developed adverse postoperative outcomes involving either the neurological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary systems. Intraoperative events appeared to be less important than preoperative comorbidities in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes.