Involuntary Admission Rates Research Articles

Regional Variance of Rates of Involuntary Admission in Switzerland

Identification of predictors that contribute to explaining regional variance of involuntary admission (IA) in Switzerland. Multiple regression analysis including potential predictors and regional rates of IA at the level of utilisation-based care regions. Authorisation to issue involuntary admission, assistance/guardianship, outpatient consultation rate in psychiatric practices, hospitalisation rate and urbanisation are significantly related to regional variation in IA rates. Restrictive regulation of the authority to issue IA and voluntary outpatient psychosocial and administrative support measures can contribute to a reduction in the rates of IA.

Patient clinical and demographic factors associated with involuntary psychiatric admission in the northern territory top end.

Australia has inadequate publicly available data regarding the use of involuntary psychiatric care. This study examined the association between patient clinical/demographic factors and involuntary psychiatric admission following initial psychiatric assessment in Royal Darwin Hospital. Retrospective review of 638 psychiatric assessments followed by covariate analysis of patient variables associated with involuntary psychiatric admission. Most of the 225 psychiatric admissions were involuntary (92%). Male patients and those with a preferred language other than English had the highest risk of being admitted involuntarily (RR 1.09, χ2 [1] = 3.9, p = .048, and RR 1.11, p = .036, respectively). Further research regarding the influence of patient demographics and clinical factors on rates of involuntary admissions, particularly for Aboriginal patients, is recommended. The findings prompt discussion on strategies to improve monitoring of involuntary care and barriers to voluntary treatment.

Social determinants of involuntary psychiatric hospital admissions in Ontario, Canada

IntroductionIn Ontario, Canada, patients may be admitted to the hospital involuntarily if they are deemed to be suffering from symptoms of a mental disorder that may result in imminent serious bodily harm to themselves or others, or that may cause serious physical impairment to themselves (e.g., inability to keep themselves safe and warm in the winter). This measure can be life-saving. However, in addition to ethical and human rights considerations, resorting to coercive admissions may be an indication that those who are suffering from mental illness are not able to access or receive timely and appropriate intervention. While recent studies have suggested that the rate of involuntary hospital admission may be increasing, data on social determinants of involuntary hospital admissions are limited.ObjectivesWe examined social factors associated with involuntary admissions using a Canadian provincial database.MethodsBinary logistic regression models were conducted to examine the associations between social factors (low income, indigeneity, rurality, housing type) and involuntary admissions, controlling for age, sex, and psychiatric diagnoses. Data from March 2019 to March 2021 was extracted from the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission dataset, comprising of a sample of 9,848 patients admitted to eight psychiatric hospitals in Ontario. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported.ResultsIn 2021, the proportion of involuntary patients increased significantly by 6.8 percentage points to 55.7% compared to the previous year (48.9%). Indigenous status (First Nations, Metis, Inuit) [1.75 (1.38-2.21) **], living in rural areas [2.78 (2.48-3.12)], living in assisted residence [1.41 (1.21-1.64) **], homelessness [1.63 (1.38-1.91) **], male sex [1.21 (1.10-1.33) **] and younger age [0.99 (0.98-0.99) **] were associated with involuntary admissions, while income was not a significant factor. Compared to a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, substance use disorders [0.11 (0.10-0.13) **] and mood and anxiety disorders [0.32 (0.29-0.36) **] showed decreased odds of involuntary admission, while neurocognitive disorders increased the odds of involuntary admission [3.86 (2.91-5.11) **].ConclusionsConsistent with other findings, involuntary psychiatric hospital admissions in ON, Canada, have increased recently, which may in part be related to the pandemic. Rurality, indigenous status, and unstable housing have been found to be associated with involuntary admissions. The study findings support the need for better preventive and intervention strategies to serve vulnerable psychiatric patients, including addressing the social determinants of health such as housing, and increasing access to culturally competent and safe community-based mental health supports and services.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Sex perspective on mandatory admission in acute psychotic patients

IntroductionPsychotic disorders are strongly linked to a higher risk of mandatory hospitalization, often affecting men more, though some studies report the opposite. Recent investigations also show a higher rate of involuntary admissions in younger individuals. Knowledge in this area is still limited despite extensive research.ObjectivesAnalyze whether there is an association between sex and age with involuntary admissions of individuals with psychotic disorders.MethodsRetrospectively, 254 people with psychotic disorders admitted between 2018-2023 to the adult psychiatric inpatient unit at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol were selected, collecting their nature of admission, sex, age, and discharge diagnosis. Comparisons between voluntary and involuntary admissions, with respect to sex and age variables, were conducted using independent sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Fisher’s exact test, and chi-square tests. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables significantly associated with mandatory admission.ResultsIn both the male and female groups, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of the mean age at admission (p = 0.162) or the nature of admission (p = 0.586) ( Table 1). When analyzing the voluntary nature of admission based on age and sex, statistically significant differences were only found in the female group (p = 0.01), resulting in a 9.18 year age difference among those admitted voluntarily ( Table 2). The model that best predicted the probability of involuntary admission in individuals with psychotic disorders included the sex variable (OR = 4.88) and the interaction between sex and age (OR = 0.97) ( Table 3). Table 1:Differences between sex regarding voluntariness of patients with psychotic disorders.MaleFemalep valueN (%)122 (48%)132 (52%)Age, m (SD)38.39 (16.64)44.15 (18.44)0.162Admissions, N (%)Voluntary38 (31.1%)37 (28.0%)0.586Involuntary84 (68.9%)95 (72.0%) Table 2:Analysis of voluntariness by sex and age.Age, m (SD)VoluntaryInvoluntaryp valueMale37.45 (16.38)38.81 (16.84)0.677Female50.76 (18.19)41.58 (17.98)0.01*Total44.01 (18.44)40.28 (17.46)0.127 Table 3:Predictors of involuntariness in psychotic patients: Logistic regression model (ENTER METHOD). Predictor -2log likelihood Nagelkerke R2 x2 (df*) OR* (95% CI*)p value301.220.0390.03 (1)Age1.01 (0.98; 1.03)0.674Sex4.88 (1.15; 20.72)0.032*Age x Sex Interaction0.97 (0.94; 0.99)0.046*ConclusionsYoung women with psychotic disorders face a higher risk of involuntary admissions, emphasizing the need for gender-specific strategies to improve care of these patients.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

The Impact of COVID-19 on Psychiatric Acuity in a Community Psychiatric Hospital.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had extensive impacts on mental health care delivery. Anecdotal observations of inpatient care teams at Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute suggested increased patient acuity during the pandemic. The authors found no consensus definition for measuring psychiatric acuity in the literature. We performed an interrupted time series analysis to identify whether COVID-19 was associated with changes in several hospital parameters that might reflect our patients' access to psychiatric services and acuity. We found increases in inpatient parameters for length of stay, rates of involuntary admissions, and the incidence of restraints, seclusion, and 1:1 observation orders. Observing these increasing trends can inform mitigation efforts to improve the quality of mental health care treatment and care delivery. We suggest the use of these metrics for objective measurements of psychiatric acuity.

Beyond Patient Characteristics: A Narrative Review of Contextual Factors Influencing Involuntary Admissions in Mental Health Care.

Variations in the rates of involuntary admission (IA) reflect the influence of unexplained contextual variables that are typically too heterogeneous to be included in systematic reviews. This paper attempts to gather and analyze factors unrelated to the patients that have been linked to IA. The articles included in this review were selected by iteratively searching four electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science). A total of 54 studies from 19 different countries and regions, including 14 European countries, the United States, Canada, China, Vietnam, and Taiwan, were selected. The factors were categorized as service-related factors, impactful events, seasonal and temporal factors, mental health legislation, staff factors, and public attitudes. The factors rarely act in isolation but rather interact and reinforce each other, causing a greater influence on IA. This paper explains how these factors present opportunities for robust and sustainable interventions to reduce IAs. The paper also identifies future directions for research, such as examining the effects of economic recessions. Enhancing global reporting standards is essential to validate future research and support further in-depth studies. The complexity of the factors influencing IA and the implicit role of society suggest that resolving it will require social change.

Differences in clinical presentation at first hospitalization and the impact on involuntary admissions among first-generation migrant groups with non-affective psychotic disorders.

Some migrant and ethnic minority groups have a higher risk of coercive pathways to care; however, it is unclear whether differences in clinical presentation contribute to this risk. We sought to assess: (i) whether there were differences in clinician-rated symptoms and behaviours across first-generation immigrant and refugee groups at the first psychiatric hospitalization after psychosis diagnosis, and (ii) whether these differences accounted for disparities in involuntary admission. Using population-based health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, we constructed a sample (2009-2013) of incident cases of non-affective psychotic disorder followed for two years to identify first psychiatric hospitalization. We compared clinician-rated symptoms and behaviours at admission between first-generation immigrants and refugees and the general population, and adjusted for these variables to ascertain whether the elevated prevalence of involuntary admission persisted. Immigrants and refugee groups tended to have lower ratings for affective symptoms, self-harm behaviours, and substance use, as well as higher levels of medication nonadherence and poor insight. Immigrant groups were more likely to be perceived as aggressive and a risk of harm to others, and both groups were perceived as having self-care issues. Adjustment for perceived differences in clinical presentation at admission did not attenuate the higher prevalence of involuntary admission for immigrant and refugee groups. First-generation migrant groups may differ in clinical presentation during the early course of psychotic illness, although these perceived differences did not explain the elevated rates of involuntary admission. Further research using outpatient samples and tools with established cross-cultural validity are warranted.

Compulsory admission: are there differences between migrants and natives? Data from a psychiatric emergency service of an Italian metropolitan area

BackgroundAs compared to natives, higher rates of involuntary admission were found among migrants in most European countries. A possible strategy to reduce this phenomenon is to develop preventive strategies targeting risk and protective factors of compulsory admission specific to the migrant population. AimsThe first aim of the present study was to evaluate compulsory admission rates in the migrant population as compared to natives admitted for an acute mental disorder. The second aim was investigate whether sociodemographic, clinical, and care-related variables associated with compulsory admission differed between migrants and natives. Moreover, in the whole sample we assessed whether migrant status affected the risk of compulsory admission. MethodsRetrospective single-center study on patients hospitalized in the period between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 in a large metropolitan academic hospital. We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and care-related variables between migrants and natives, voluntary or compulsory admitted. We investigated the association between compulsory admission and the variables collected in the whole sample and in the migrants' and natives’ groups with a correlation analysis followed by hierarchical logistic regression models. ResultsThe sample included 185 migrant patients and 933 native patients. The prevalence of compulsory admission was significantly higher in the migrants' group. Male gender, lower education, non-comprehension of the local language, a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and aggressive behavior were associated with compulsory admission in the migrants’ sample, partially differing from the natives. ConclusionOur study highlighted how migrant status is associated with a higher risk for compulsory admission. Inclusion policies or the presence of cultural mediators in emergency settings might be preventive strategies in this context.

First-admissions in Psychiatry: a cluster analysis of a sample of inpatients from 2019 to 2021

IntroductionOnly a few studies analyse the clinical and psychopathological characteristics of first-admitted inpatients regardless of diagnosis.ObjectivesDescribing the psychopathological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of inpatients with acute symptomatology identifying groups with common features using factors extracted from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).MethodsWe selected 103 (48 F) inpatients from the psychiatric ward of the Sant’Andrea Hospital in Rome from January 2019 to December 2021. We assessed psychopathological characteristics and suicide risk with BPRS, Global Assessment of Functioning, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale and gathered the anamnestic and demographic data. We conducted descriptive analyses and factor analysis on BPRS items. Then we used the BPRS factors as variables to perform a cluster analysis.ResultsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) was the most frequent diagnosis. We obtained five factors: “Psychotic dimensions” (FI); “Anxiety” (FII); “Hostility and lack of cooperation” (FIII); “Depression” (FIV); “Flattening of affectivity” (FV). We identified two clusters (cluster 1 n=31; cluster 2 n=72). Patients in cluster 1 reported higher average scores in FI and FIII while the average scores of cluster 2 patients in FII and FIV were higher than patients in cluster 1. We called cluster 1 “psychotic and hostile patients compulsory admitted with a low risk of suicide”. Cluster 2 patients are “affective patients with a high risk of suicide”. The two clusters share an average age of 38-39 yo and an average GAF score indicating severe impairment and inability to function in almost all areas. They differ in the psychiatric diagnosis represented: respectively, Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder and Bipolar Disorder with low suicidal risk, MDD, and Personality Disorders with a high suicidal risk. 39% of patients in cluster 1 were involuntarily admitted.ConclusionsThe results of our study show that patients admitted for the first time usually are admitted for psychotic symptoms and a high risk of suicide. Psychotic patients more often show hostility and lack of cooperativeness which can explain the higher rate of involuntary admissions. Patients with predominant affective symptoms show a higher risk of suicide. Our analyses do not consider categorical diagnosis highlighting that exist transdiagnostic groups of patients with specific needs.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act: an exploration of mediation effects of clinical care prior to the first admission.

Studies show ethnic inequalities in rates of involuntary admission and types of clinical care (such as psychological therapies). However, few studies have investigated if there is a relationship between clinical care practices and ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission. This study investigated the impact of ethnicity and clinical care on involuntary admission and the potential mediation effects of prior clinical care. In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the electronic records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and identified patients with a first hospital admission between January 2008 and May 2021. Logistic regression and mediation analyses were used to investigate the association between ethnicity and involuntary admission, and whether clinical care, in the 12 months preceding admission, mediates the association. Compared with White British people, higher odds of involuntary admission were observed among 10 of 14 minority ethnic groups; with more than twice the odds observed among people of Asian Chinese, of Asian Bangladeshi and of any Black background. There were some ethnic differences in clinical care prior to admission, but these had a minimal impact on the inequalities in involuntary admission. More out-patient appointments and home treatment were associated with higher odds of involuntary admission, whereas psychological therapies and having a care plan were associated with reduced odds of involuntary admission. Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission persist after accounting for potential mediating effects of several types and frequencies of clinical care. Promoting access to psychological therapies and ensuring that care plans are in place may reduce involuntary admissions.

The ReCoN intervention: a co-created comprehensive intervention for primary mental health care aiming to prevent involuntary admissions

BackgroundReducing involuntary psychiatric admissions is a global concern. In Norway, the rate of involuntary admissions was 199 per 100,000 people 16 years and older in 2020. Individuals’ paths towards involuntary psychiatric admissions usually unfold when they live in the community and referrals to such admissions are often initiated by primary health care professionals. Interventions at the primary health care level can therefore have the potential to prevent such admissions. Interventions developed specifically for this care level are, however, lacking. To enhance the quality and development of services in a way that meets stakeholders’ needs and facilitates implementation to practice, involving both persons with lived experience and service providers in developing such interventions is requested.AimTo develop a comprehensive intervention for primary mental health care aiming to prevent involuntary admissions of adults.MethodsThis study had an action research approach with a participatory research design. Dialogue conferences with multiple stakeholders in five Norwegian municipalities, inductive thematic analysis of data material from the conferences, and a series of feedback meetings were conducted.ResultsThe co-creation process resulted in the development of the ReCoN (Reducing Coercion in Norway) intervention. This is a comprehensive intervention that includes six strategy areas: [1] Management, [2] Involving Persons with Lived Experience and Family Carers, [3] Competence Development, [4] Collaboration across Primary and Specialist Care Levels, [5] Collaboration within the Primary Care Level, and [6] Tailoring Individual Services. Each strategy area has two to four action areas with specified measures that constitute the practical actions or tasks that are believed to collectively impact the need for involuntary admissions.ConclusionsThe ReCoN intervention has the potential for application to both national and international mental health services. The co-creation process with the full range of stakeholders ensures face validity, acceptability, and relevance. The effectiveness of the ReCoN intervention is currently being tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial. Given positive effects, the ReCoN intervention may impact individuals with a severe mental illness at risk of involuntary admissions, as more people may experience empowerment and autonomy instead of coercion in their recovery process.

National Mental Health Performance Framework: Descriptive analysis of state and national data for 2019-2020.

To compare key performance indicators for public state and territory specialist mental health services in Australia. A descriptive analysis of the publicly-available National Mental Health Performance Framework key performance indicators (KPI), hosted by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for 2019-2020, at the national level and for states and territories. The real-world performance of public mental health services varied across the eight states and territories of Australia. Western Australia had the longest acute hospital stays and the lowest rates of involuntary admissions. Queensland (QLD) had the shortest acute hospital stays at the lowest cost. While the Australian Capital Territory had the highest rates of community treatment at the lowest cost, the Northern Territory had highest hospital and community costs with the most involuntary admissions. Victoria (VIC) had the lowest population percentage receiving specialised mental health services, the highest readmission rates after 28 days, and highest physical and mechanical restraint rates. The KPIs indicate that some states and territories show deviations from national benchmarks that may be important for consumers, carers and clinicians. For further improvement in quality and efficiency, more detailed contextual information is required, including detailed mapping of services.

Proportion and characteristics of young people in a first-episode psychosis clinic who first attended an at-risk mental state service or other specialist youth mental health service

BackgroundServices for young people identified as having an ‘at-risk mental state’ (ARMS) aim to prevent transition to first-episode psychosis (FEP), in addition, early intervention services for other mental health disorders have also been developed. The aim of the current study was to determine the proportion of young people attending a specialist FEP service who had been referred via other early intervention clinics, including an ARMS clinic, and compare the characteristics to those who presented directly to the FEP service. MethodsWe included young people diagnosed with FEP who received treatment at Orygen between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2016. We examined rates of direct entry to the First Episode Psychosis service and rates from other early intervention services, specifically ARMS, personality disorders, mood disorders and a primary care youth mental health service clinics. Results1138 young people were diagnosed with a FEP, of whom 13.7% first attended an ARMS clinic and a further 7.6% attended other youth mental health services. Individuals who first presented to an ARMS clinic were more likely to be female, younger, and less likely to be migrants or use substances. Rates of both voluntary and involuntary hospital admissions were significantly reduced for young people who transitioned from the ARMS clinic, the personality disorder clinic or the primary care service compared to those who presented directly with FEP. ConclusionsA significant proportion of young people with FEP initially attended another specialist youth mental health service, and importantly, they had much lower rates of hospital admission at the time of transition to FEP.

Involuntary admission and treatment of mentally ill patients – the role and accountability of mental health review boards

The involuntary admission or treatment of a mentally ill individual is highly controversial, as it may be argued that such intervention infringes on individual autonomy and the right to choose a particular treatment. However, this argument must be balanced with the need to provide immediate healthcare services to a vulnerable person who cannot or will not make a choice in his or her own best interests at a particular time. A study carried out in Gauteng Province, South Africa (SA), highlighted the fact that the annual rate of involuntary admissions increased by almost double from 2007 to 2008. This could indicate that healthcare providers are not treating patients without their consent only when this is absolutely necessary. Alternatively, it could indicate that healthcare professionals are more aware of the provisions of the Mental Health Care Act and relevant national policy guidelines. Or it could suggest that more patients are presenting with mental illnesses or disorders that require their involuntary admission. It remains for strategies to be developed that change negative perceptions and inequities for individuals with mental illness. Above all, the strategies should be underpinned by inalienable respect for mentally ill individuals – a concept that was blatantly disregarded in the Life Esidimeni case. In this article, we highlight the functions of mental health review boards and their accountability where involuntary admissions are concerned, while emphasising the protections for mentally ill persons as a vulnerable population group, as set out in the SA Constitution.

England's rate of involuntary psychiatric admission is double that of the Republic of Ireland: Why? A consideration of some possible causes.

Involuntary psychiatric admission or 'sectioning' is a serious event with clear implications for the right to liberty, among other rights. Rates of involuntary admission vary considerably across jurisdictions. The rate of involuntary admission in England is approximately double that in the Republic of Ireland. Why? This paper examines potential explanations for this difference, including the prevalence of mental disorder in the two jurisdictions, factors relating to mental health legislation, differing levels of police involvement in care-pathways, funding and resources, and attitudes to risk among the public and professionals. Overall, it appears that the relatively high rate of involuntary admission in England might be attributable to the role of perceived risk in shaping mental health law in England but not Ireland, the broader definition of 'mental disorder' in the Mental Health Act, 1983 in England, broader legal criteria for involuntary admission in the 1983 Act, differences in the operational definitions of 'voluntary patient' between the two jurisdictions and, possibly, increased involvement of police in pathways to care in England and differences in relation to different ethnic groups. The relatively higher number of inpatient beds in England could be a cause or a consequence of higher rates of involuntary admission. Future research could usefully focus on other factors that are also likely relevant: issues relating to social care, substance misuse, availability of alternative treatment options in the community and various other factors that are, as yet, unknown. The potential impact of risk aversion among mental health professionals and others merits particular attention.

Psychiatric admissions from the emergency department: An observational, retrospective study and recommendations for improved patient care and use of resources

IntroductionPsychiatric patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) often require ‘medical clearance’. We aim to review patient work-up in the ED to facilitate the management of these patients.Objectives- To identify common demographic variables, diagnoses and mental health legislative status of patients presenting to the ED requiring psychiatric admission - To assess whether patients underwent a medical work-up in the ED, and what investigations were carried out - To produce a hospital proforma for the management of psychiatric patients presenting at the EDMethodsData on adult psychiatric patients visiting the ED over a six month period was collected retrospectively, which was then analysed accordingly.Results473 patient admissions were reviewed. 32.8% were admitted to a non-psychiatric specialty before being accepted to psychiatry, with the most common reasons being due to overdose (30.3%), alcohol-related problems (19.4%), and medical complaints (18.7%). 63.2% of all patients were investigated in the ED, including 23.5% undergoing CT Brain imaging. The majority had a final diagnosis falling under F10-19 (30.2%) and F30-39 (30.9%) chapter categories of the ICD-10, with the former having the highest absolute number of patients undergoing testing in the ED. The F20-29 group (13.7%) was highest in total patients investigated (75.4%), CT brain imaging (56.9%), and rate of involuntary admissions (33.8%), suggesting they are the most resource intensive group.ConclusionsPatients with acute mental disorders present significant challenges to emergency physicians. Staff education and an inter-departmentally agreed upon proforma, taking into account the results of this study, may facilitate management of these patients within the ED.

Psychiatric Emergencies in the Community: Characteristics and Outcome in Switzerland

Psychiatric emergencies occur frequently in the community setting, e.g. the patient’s home or public places. Little is known about the characteristics and outcome of these situations. This study describes psychiatric emergencies in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, and examines determinants of their outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 620 medical records of consultations classified as psychiatric emergencies of a 24/7 service of community-based emergency physicians. Information on sociodemographic, clinical and situational factors was extracted. The observation period was 6 months in 2017. Binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors for involuntary admissions. Most emergency consultations (64.5%) took place at the patient’s home, followed by police stations (31.0%), public places (3.2%), and somatic hospitals (1.3%). Patient characteristics and reasons for consultation varied considerably between the locations. The first involved person was commonly a relative. Of all consultations, 38.4% resulted in involuntary admissions, mainly in patients with psychosis, suicidality, aggression, refusal of necessary treatment and previous involuntary admissions. Situation-related factors and the involvement of relatives were no significant predictors of the outcome. Psychiatric emergencies occur in different places and in patients with a variety of psychiatric symptoms. Although half of the emergency situations were resolved in the community, the rate of involuntary admissions was still high. For additional reduction, the further development of quickly available alternatives to psychiatric inpatient treatment is required. These should be specifically geared towards acute situations in patients with the described risk factors. Additionally, the role of relatives during psychiatric emergencies should be further studied.

Homelessness amongst psychiatric Inpatients: a cross-sectional study in the mid-west of Ireland.

This cross-sectional study sought to establish the prevalence of homelessness amongst inpatients in two psychiatric units in Ireland and explore the perceived relationship between psychiatric illness and homelessness. The study employed a semi-structured interview format utilising a specifically designed questionnaire which received ethical approval from the Limerick University Hospitals Group ethics committee. Fifty psychiatric inpatients were interviewed. Fifteen were either "currently" homeless (n=8) or had experienced "past" homelessness (n=7). Those who had experienced homelessness were more likely to have a psychotic illness. A majority of those who had experienced homelessness believed that psychiatric illness contributed to their homelessness. Involuntary admission rates were more than double for patients in the homeless group. A number of participants also reported that a lack of accommodation was preventing their discharge. Homelessness affects a significant number of psychiatric patients and can be both a contributory factor to, and consequence of, mental illness. With homelessness at unprecedented levels, there is a need for the development of tailored programmes aimed at supporting these vulnerable groups.

Factors associated with involuntary admissions: a register-based cross-sectional multicenter study

BackgroundDespite the EU recommendations on mental health, involuntary admission has been under researched in Italy for a long time and the overall picture of involuntary admission still appears fragmentary. The aims of this study are to evaluate involuntary admission rates in the Piedmont Region (Italy) and to investigate clinical and service-related variables associated with involuntary admission.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study involving all psychiatric inpatients units of the general hospitals of Piedmont Region. Data on hospitalizations during 2016 were collected by consulting hospital discharge registers. The analyses were performed on two samples: 6018 patients (data analysis was run on first hospitalization during the study period for those with multiple admissions) and 7881 inpatient episodes. The association between involuntary admission and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics was examined through t-test for continuous variables, and Pearson’s Chi-square test for categorical variables. Multilevel modeling was applied in logistic regression models with two levels: for the first model center and participants and for the second model center and inpatient episodes.ResultsOf 6018 inpatients, 10.1% were admitted involuntarily at first hospitalization, while the overall compulsory treatment rate was slightly lower (9.1%) in the inpatient episodes sample (n = 7881). The involuntary admission rates ranged from 0.8 to 21% among study centers. Involuntary admissions were primarily associated with younger age, diagnosis of schizophrenia or substance use disorders, longer duration of hospital stay, mechanical restraint episodes, and fewer subsequent hospitalizations during the study period.ConclusionsThe rate of involuntary admission in the Piedmont Region was lower than the mean rate across countries worldwide. There were noteworthy differences in rates of involuntary admission among psychiatric units, although no relationship was found with characteristics of the psychiatric wards or of the areas where hospitals are located.

Symptomatic, functional and service utilization outcomes of migrants with a first episode of psychosis.

Certain migrant groups have been identified as being at increased risk of developing a psychotic disorder, but there is limited research on the outcomes for migrants who develop a first episode of psychosis (FEP). We investigated symptomatic outcomes (remission and relapse rates), functional outcomes (occupational status and relationships) and service utilization (hospital admission and engagement). Young people, aged between 15 and 24, who presented with FEP to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) at Orygen between 01.01.11 and 31.12.16 were included. Place of birth was recorded at the time of presentation. To determine remission, symptoms were scored at three-month intervals using the short-form Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. A total of 1220 young people presented with FEP over the six-year period (mean age = 19.6 ± 2.8). Of these, 58.1% were male and 24.0% were first-generation migrants. While there was no difference in overall rates of admission after presentation, migrants were more likely to have an involuntary admission after presentation (31.4% vs. 24.6%, aHR = 1.54, 95% CI [1.19, 2.01]) and this risk was greatest for African migrants (HR = 1.98, 95% C.I. [1.37, 2.86]. The rates of remission and relapse were similar in migrants and those born in Australia and there was no difference in functional outcomes, such as employment rates at follow-up. The outcomes for migrants who experience FEP appear to be largely similar to those for the Australian-born population. Our finding that a greater rate of involuntary admission for migrants at presentation supports existing literature and needs further exploration to improve clinical care.