Rate Of Force Development Scaling Factor Research Articles

Effect of mental fatigue on hand force production capacities.

Mental fatigue is common in society, but its effects on force production capacities remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of mental fatigue on maximal force production, rate of force development-scaling factor (RFD-SF), and force steadiness during handgrip contractions. Fourteen participants performed two randomized sessions, during which they either carried out a cognitively demanding task (i.e., a visual attention task) or a cognitively nondemanding task (i.e., documentary watching for 62 min). The mental fatigue was evaluated subjectively and objectively (performances and electroencephalography). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force, RFD-SF, and force steadiness (i.e., force coefficient of variation at submaximal intensities; 25, 50, and 75% of MVC) were recorded before and after both tasks. The feeling of mental fatigue was much higher after completing the cognitively demanding task than after documentary watching (p < .001). During the cognitively demanding task, mental fatigue was evidenced by increased errors, missed trials, and decreased N100 amplitude over time. While no effect was reported on force steadiness, both tasks induced a decrease in MVC (p = .040), a force RFD-SF lower slope (p = .011), and a reduction in the coefficient of determination (p = .011). Nevertheless, these effects were not explicitly linked to mental fatigue since they appeared both after the mentally fatiguing task and after watching the documentary. The study highlights the importance of considering cognitive engagement and mental load when optimizing motor performance to mitigate adverse effects and improve force production capacities.

Is the rate of force development scaling factor associated with the rate of agonist muscle activation scaling factor and the level of agonist-antagonist coactivation?

BACKGROUND: Rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) is used to assess neuromuscular quickness across submaximal levels. It has been suggested that such metric would be associated with the magnitude of the agonist muscle activation and with the level of simultaneous antagonist muscle group activation, i.e., agonist-antagonist coactivation. AIM: To examine the associations between 1) the RFD-SF and the rate of agonist muscle activation scaling factor (RAgMA-SF) and 2) the RFD-SF and the agonist-antagonist coactivation. METHOD: Eleven healthy and physically active subjects (7 men and 4 women, aged between 18 and 22 years) performed maximal strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors and a test that involved the production of brief submaximal force pulses of the knee extensors. The force exerted was recorded by a load cell and the electromyographic activities of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscles were obtained during the tests. In the brief force pulses test, individuals were asked to produce around 120 submaximal force pulses that ranged between 20 to 80% of their maximum force value, while trying to produce each force pulse as fast as possible. The values of RFD-SF, RAgMA-SF of the vastus lateralis muscle, and a coactivation index (ICOA) were computed. RESULTS: The RFD-SF is strongly associated with the RAgMA-SF (r=0.74; p=0.009) but not with the ICOA (r=0.29; p=0.38). CONCLUSION: The RFD-SF is directly associated with the rate of agonist muscle activation and is not affected by the degree of coactivation between agonist and antagonist muscles.

Evaluation of the Reduced Protocol for the Assessment of Rate of Force Development Scaling Factor

The rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) has been used to assess neuromuscular quickness. However, the common protocols are lengthy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the reduced protocol to assess the RFD-SF and its validity in detecting inter-limb asymmetries. Eighteen participants (five females and thirteen males; mean age = 20.8 ± 0.6 years) performed the common and reduced RFD-SF protocols (five isometric pulse knee extensions at 30 and 70% of maximal voluntary contraction). A repeat measure design was employed including one test session of the common protocol and two test sessions of the reduced protocol. Correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the two protocols, while a paired-sample t-test and a Bland–Altman plot assessed whether the reduced protocol provided valid results. The between-day reliability was assessed using an intra-class correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation, typical error of measurement, and paired-sample t-test. The validity to detect asymmetries was checked with the paired-sample t-test. The correlation between RFD-SF obtained using two protocols was significant (p &lt; 0.001) and very large for the dominant (r = 0.71) and non-dominant (r = 0.80) legs. No significant difference occurred between protocols in the RFD-SF for the dominant (p = 0.480, d = 0.17) and non-dominant legs (p = 0.213, d = 0.31). The reliability was acceptable for both legs, with no between-day difference for the dominant (p = 0.393) and non-dominant legs (p = 0.436). No significant difference between the two protocols (p = 0.415, d = 0.19) was found in the detection of inter-limb asymmetries. The results of this study suggest that the reduced protocol could be used as a valid and reliable alternative to the common protocol, as well as to identify interlimb asymmetries.

The rate of force development scaling factor: a review of underlying factors, assessment methods and potential for practical applications.

When humans perform isometric ballistic contractions of different intensities, a strong linear relationship is observed between peak force and peak rate of force development. The slope of this relationship, termed the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF), has been proposed as a measure of neuromuscular quickness of submaximal contractions. The RFD-SF is largely dependent on motor unit firing rate and its modulation with contraction intensity, and possibly by agonist-antagonist coordination. The purpose of this review was to critically evaluate the available literature on RFD-SF, including the underlying physiological mechanisms, assessment protocols and methodological considerations, practical application to clinical and sports practice and additional factors such as sex, muscle group, task and fatigue. The main findings of the review are: (a) RFD-SF is very sensitive to impairments associated with aging and neurological diseases, (b) the literature lacks studies on the importance of RFD-SF for athletes, with some evidence that RFD-SF may affect the accuracy of submaximal movements, (c) RFD-SF is not largely influenced by fatigue and sex, (d) the RFD-SF values have been very consistent across muscle groups, with an exception of ankle muscles, (e) the methodology for RFD-SF assessment appears to be well established and standardized. Future research is needed to determine if RFD-SF provides any independent information that cannot be captured with peak force/torque and RFD.

Investigation of Inter-Limb Symmetry in Knee Extensors Using Different Strength Outcome Measures.

Muscle performance between contra-lateral knee extensors is most often assessed using maximal test for isometric/isokinetic torque evaluation. Recently, the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) has been used to evaluate neuromuscular capacity with a range of submaximal target peak torques, which could highlight other aspects of inter-limb (a)symmetry. The aim of our study was to investigate the differences, associations, and agreement between inter-limb symmetries of knee extensors using maximal torque (Tmax) rate of torque development (RTD), slope of the RFD-SF regression line (k), and theoretical peak of RTD (TPRTD). A total of 236 young, healthy athletes participated in the cross-sectional study. All participants performed unilateral knee extension (maximal voluntary contraction protocol and RFD-SF protocol) with both legs in the isometric knee dynamometer. Inter-limb symmetries were calculated for each outcome measure. Our results showed significant differences between all symmetry values (Tmax (91.7%), RTD (85.2%), k (94.2%), TPRTD (95.9%)). Significant strong correlations were found between symmetry values calculated from k and TPRTD (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), while weak correlation was found between Tmax and RTD (r = 0.17, p < 0.01. Fair agreement regarding leg dominance was found between Tmax and RTD values. Our results suggest that inter-limb (a)symmetries are metric- and task-specific.

Introduction of dynamic rate-of-force development scaling factor in progressive drop jumps

Rapid force generation across submaximal levels has been evaluated with the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) in different isometric tasks, while such measurement was still not verified in dynamic tasks. Our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the RFD-SF in dynamic drop jump (DJ) task (RFD-SFDJ). A total of 55 young athletes performed isometric plantarflexion at different submaximal intensities and 60 DJs (6 different drop heights). For each participant we calculated linearity (r2) and slope in isometric task (RFD-SFPF), eccentric part of DJ (RFD-SFDJ-ECC) and concentric part of DJ (RFD-SFDJ-CON), as well as average jump height (DJH) from each drop height. Our results revealed strong linear force-RFD relationship for isometric plantarflexion (r2 = 0.90 ± 0.06), eccentric (r2 = 0.87 ± 0.09) and concentric phase of DJ (r2 = 0.80 ± 0.18). Significant moderate positive correlations were calculated between RFD-SFPF and RFD-SFDJ-ECC (r = 0.311, p < 0.05) and small negative correlations between RFD-SFDJ-CON and RFD-SF (r = -0.276, p < 0.05). Significant positive moderate correlations were seen only between RFD-SFDJ-ECC and DJH from 10 cm (r = 0.459, p < 0.001) and 15 cm (r = 0.423, p < 0.01). This is the first study to introduce and confirm that RFD-SFDJ can be obtained from the multi-joint tasks (60 jumps) and still provide acceptable reliability and linear relationship. Furthermore, RFD-SFDJ may have greater practical application than RFD-SF assessed under the isometric conditions. This verification of RFD-SFDJ opens opportunities for further research regarding its practical application.

Age- and Sex-Related Differences in the Maximum Muscle Performance and Rate of Force Development Scaling Factor of Precision Grip Muscles.

The aim of this study was to explore the effects of age and sex on the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) and maximum performance (i.e.,maximum grip force [GFMax] and maximum rate of grip force development [RGFDMax]) of precision handgrip muscles. Sixty-four subjects, allocated in four groups according to their age and sex, were asked to hold an instrumented handle with the tip of the digits and perform two tests: maximum voluntary contraction and RFD-SF tests. In the maximum voluntary contraction test, GFMax and RGFDMax were assessed. In the RFD-SF test, the subjects generated quick isometric force pulses to target amplitudes varying between 20% and 100% of their GFMax. The RFD-SF and R2 values were obtained from the linear relationship between the peak values of the force pulses and the corresponding peak values of the rate of force development. Younger adults and males produced higher GFMax and RGFDMax and presented higher R2 and RFD-SF than older adults and females, respectively. No correlations between GFMax and RFD-SF and between RGFDMax and RFD-SF were observed.

Methodological considerations in the calculation of the rate of force development scaling factor

Objective: Within this methodological study, we aimed to explore the effects of seven different commonly applied routines for rate of force development (RFD) calculation on the calculation of rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) and r2 and the between session reliability of RFD-SF in three different muscle groups. Approach: We tested grip force muscles, elbow extensors and knee extensors of 13 healthy subjects asking them to produce around 120 rapid isometric force pulses per muscle to varying submaximal amplitudes. Then, we applied different filtering and analysis procedures, such as different filtering cut-off frequencies (no filter, 5 Hz cut-off, 10 Hz cut-off) and time windows during which RFD was calculated (0–50 ms, 0–75 ms, 0–100 ms and time from onset of contraction to peak force (PF) value). RFD-SF and r2 were obtained from the relationship between the PF and the corresponding RFD. Results: Our results showed that the magnitude of the calculated RFD-SF and r2 values significantly differed among different RFD calculation methods (p < 0.0005), but that r2 was high in most applied methods (RFD-SF ranged between 4.6 and 17.7, while r2 ranged between 0.63 and 0.98). Regardless of the tested muscle group and applied method to calculate RFD, the reliability of the calculated RFD-SF was moderate (0.5 < ICC3,1 < 0.75) to good (ICC3,1 > 0.75). The highest r2, highest ICC, lowest SEM% and MDD% were observed in case of RFD calculated during first 100 ms and when cut-off filter at 5 Hz was applied, indicating those two methods as the most appropriate ones. Significance: Our study contributes to the establishment of methodological suggestions that will help in maximizing the reliability of RFD-SF measurements, collecting normative data, and comparing results among different populations and lab settings.

Assessment of the rate of force development scaling factor for the hip muscles

The aim of this study was to evaluate test feasibility, validity, and reproducibility of the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) for the hip muscles. Feasibility was assessed as the testing compliance, validity as the ability to compute the RFD-SF from a linear regression, and reproducibility with a test-retest design in 20 healthy subjects. Reliability and agreement (reproducibility) were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) and percent standard error of measurement (SEM), respectively. The RFD-SF testing protocol was completed successfully by all subjects, although the analysis had to be modified for hip rotators. Reliability was high (ICC3,1 > 0.70) for all muscles except hip abductors (ICC3,1 = 0.69) and internal rotators (ICC3,1 = 0.58). Agreement was high for all muscles (SEM < 10%). Hip adductor, flexor, and external rotator RFD-SF can be evaluated with confidence, provided the analysis is modified for external rotators, whereas hip abductor and internal rotator RFD-SF assessment is not recommended.

The rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF): protocol, reliability, and muscle comparisons

Performing a set of isometric muscular contractions to varied amplitudes with instructions to generate force most rapidly reveals a strong linear relationship between peak forces (PF) achieved and corresponding peak rates of force development (RFD). The slope of this relationship, termed the RFD scaling factor (RFD-SF), quantifies the extent to which RFD scales with contraction amplitude. Such scaling allows relative invariance in the time required to reach PF regardless of contraction size. Considering the increasing use of this relationship to study quickness and consequences of slowness in older adults and movement disorders, our purpose was to further develop the protocol to measure RFD-SF. Fifteen adults (19-28 years) performed 125 rapid isometric contractions to a variety of force levels in elbow extensors, index finger abductors, and knee extensors, on 2 days. Data were used to determine (1) how the number of pulses affects computation of the RFD-SF, (2) day-to-day reliability of the RFD-SF, and (3) the nature of RFD-SF differences between diverse muscle groups. While sensitive to the number of pulses used in its computation (P<.05), RFD-SF was reliable when computed with >50 pulses (ICC>.7) and more so with 100-125 pulses (ICC=.8-.92). Despite differences in size and function across muscles, RFD-SF was generally similar (i.e., only 8.5% greater in elbow extensors than in index finger abductors and knee extensors; P=.049). Results support this protocol as a reliable means to assess how RFD scales with PF in rapid isometric contractions as well as a simple, non-invasive probe into neuromuscular health.