Rates Of Coronary Revascularization Research Articles

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Diabetes may be associated with differential outcomes in patients undergoing left main coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes in patients with left main disease with and without diabetes randomized to PCI versus CABG. Individual patient data were pooled from 4 trials (SYNTAX [Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery], PRECOMBAT [Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease], NOBLE [Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularisation Study], and EXCEL [Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization]) that randomized patients with left main disease to PCI or CABG. Patients were considered suitable for either approach. Patients were categorized by diabetes status. Kaplan-Meier event rates, Cox model hazard ratios, and interactions were assessed. Among 4393 patients, 1104 (25.1%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes experienced higher rates of 5-year death (158/1104 [Kaplan-Meier rate, 14.7%] versus 297/3289 [9.3%]; P<0.001), spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI; 67/1104 [6.7%] versus 114/3289 [3.7%]; P<0.001), and repeat revascularization (189/1104 [18.5%] versus 410/3289 [13.2%]; P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality did not differ after PCI versus CABG in those with (84/563 [15.3%] versus 74/541 [14.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.52]) or without (155/1634 [9.7%] versus 142/1655 [8.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.36; PintHR=0.87) diabetes. Rates of stroke within 1 year were lower with PCI versus CABG in the entire population, with no heterogeneity based on diabetes status (PintHR=0.51). The 5-year rates of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization were higher after PCI regardless of diabetes status (spontaneous MI: 45/563 [8.9%] versus 22/541 [4.4%] in diabetes and 82/1634 [5.3%] versus 32/1655 [2.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.47; repeat revascularization: 127/563 [24.5%] versus 62/541 [12.4%] in diabetes and 254/1634 [16.3%] versus 156/1655 [10.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.18). For spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, there were greater absolute risk differences beyond 1 year in patients with diabetes (4.9% and 9.9%) compared with those without (2.1% and 4.3%; PintARD=0.047 and 0.016). In patients with left main disease considered equally suitable for PCI or CABG and with largely low to intermediate SYNTAX scores, diabetes was associated with higher rates of death and cardiovascular events through 5 years. Compared with CABG, PCI resulted in no difference in the risk of death and a lower risk of early stroke regardless of diabetes status, and a higher risk of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization, with larger late absolute excess risks in patients with diabetes. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01205776, NCT0146651, NCT00422968, and NCT00114972.

Could Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography as a First-Line Diagnostic Investigation in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Decision-Analytic Model

The implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays into clinical practice has resulted in the identification of a novel cohort of patients with modestly increased troponin concentrations. Subsequent increases in rates of coronary angiography have been observed, without significant increases in rates of coronary revascularisation. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is a non-invasive investigation that offers the opportunity to decouple investigation from the impetus to revascularise, and may provide an alternative, more risk-appropriate initial investigative strategy for the cohort with low to moderate hs-cTn increases. This analysis seeks to define the threshold of pre-test probability of coronary revascularisation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome at which a strategy of initial CTCA is safe and a more cost-effective approach than standard invasive coronary angiography (ICA). A cost-benefit evaluation was conducted using a decision-analytic model. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CTCA in comparison with ICA as an initial diagnostic investigation for patients with hs-cTnT levels between 5 and 100 ng/L. Secondary outcome measures of costs, patient outcomes, and quality-adjusted life years were analysed. Median base case ICER over 1,000 trials was $17,163 AUD but demonstrated large variability. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that CTCA was cost-effective until the probability of requiring revascularisation was ∼60%, beyond which point CTCA was associated with higher costs and poorer outcomes than ICA. Computed tomography coronary angiography may be a cost-effective first-line investigation for patients with moderate hs-cTnT rises until/up to a 60% pre-test probability for receiving coronary revascularisation. To objectively assess the optimal circumstances of cost-effectiveness, prospective evaluation incorporating the estimated probability of revascularisation will be required.

Impact of untreated chronic obstructive coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients, the optimal management of concomitant chronic obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown. Some advocate for pre-TAVR percutaneous coronary intervention, while others manage it expectantly. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of varying degrees and extent of untreated chronic obstructive CAD on TAVR and longer-term outcomes. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of TAVR recipients from January 2015 to November 2021, separating patients into stable non-obstructive or varying degrees of obstructive CAD. The major outcomes of interest were procedural all-cause mortality and complications, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-TAVR unplanned coronary revascularization. Of the 1911 patients meeting inclusion, 75%, 6%, 10%, and 9% had non-obstructive, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and extreme-risk CAD, respectively. Procedural complication rates overall were low (death 0.4%, shock 0.1%, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 0.1%), with no difference across groups. At a median follow-up of 21 months, rates of acute coronary syndrome and unplanned coronary revascularization were 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively, in the non-obstructive population, rising in incidence with increasing severity of CAD (P < .001 for acute coronary syndrome/unplanned coronary revascularization). Multivariable analysis did not yield a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events across groups. One-year acute coronary syndrome and unplanned coronary revascularization rates in time-to-event analyses were significantly greater in the non-obstructive (98%) vs. obstructive (94%) subsets (Plog-rank< .001). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement can be performed safely in patients with untreated chronic obstructive CAD, without portending higher procedural complication rates and with relatively low rates of unplanned coronary revascularization and acute coronary syndrome at 1 year.

Radial artery vs right internal mammary artery as a second conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting

To compare the clinical outcomes of radial artery (RA) grafts during CABG to those of right internal mammary artery (RIMA) grafts. This was a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of isolated CABG with multiple grafts between 2010-2022. To balance graft cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using a 1:1 match ratio. Long-term postoperative survival was compared among RA and RIMA groups. Similarly, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared among both cohorts, with MACCE comprising death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and stroke. Kaplan-Meier estimation was performed for mortality, while cumulative incidence estimation was utilized for MACCE. A total of 8,774 patients underwent CABG. Of those, 1,674 (19.1%) patients who underwent multi-arterial CABG were included in this analysis. 326 (19.5%) patients received RA grafts and 1,348 (80.5%) received RIMA grafts. PSM yielded a cohort of 323 RA patients and 323 RIMA patients. After matching, groups were well-balanced across all baseline variables. No significant differences were observed in immediate postoperative complications or long-term survival, with 5-year survival estimates of 89.5% for the RA group vs 90.1% for the RIMA group. There was a non-significant trend toward a higher incidence of MACCE at 5 years in the RA group compared to the RIMA group (31.3% in the RA group vs. 24.1% in the RIMA group), especially after 1-year follow-up (21.6% in the RA group vs. 15.1% in the RIMA group). Specifically, for RA patients, there were higher rates of repeat revascularization in the 5-year postoperative period (14.7% in the RA group vs. 5.3% in the RIMA group), particularly in the territory revascularized by the RA during the index operation (45.7% in the RA group vs. 10.3% in the RIMA group). Overall, RA and RIMA secondary conduits for CABG were associated with comparable immediate postoperative complications, 5-year MACCE, and 5-year survival after PSM. RA grafting was associated with significantly higher rates of repeat coronary revascularization at 5 years, specifically in the territory revascularized by the RA during the index operation.

Outcomes of Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as A Second Conduit After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Despite the advantages of multiarterial grafting, saphenous vein (SV) configurations predominate in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In addition, the benefits of radial artery (RA) utilization in multivessel CABG remain unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who received RA grafts during CABG with those of patients who received SV grafts. A retrospective, single-institution cohort study was performed in 8,774 adults who underwent isolated CABG surgery with multiple grafts between 2010 and 2022. To balance graft cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using a 1:2 (RA/SV) match ratio. Long-term postoperative survival was compared in RA and SV graft groups. Similarly, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates were compared in the cohorts, with MACCE comprising death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and stroke. Kaplan-Meier estimation was performed for both mortality and MACCE. A total of 7,218 patients (82.3%) who underwent multivessel CABG were included in this analysis. Of these patients, 341 (4.7%) received RA grafts, and 6,877 (95.3%) received SV grafts secondary to left internal mammary artery use. PSM yielded a cohort of 335 patients with RA and 670 patients with SV. After matching, groups were well balanced across all baseline variables. No significant differences were observed in either immediate postoperative morbidities or long-term survival. However, Kaplan-Meier estimates of long-term postoperative freedom from MACCE were significantly greater in matched patients with SV (73.3%) than in those with RA (67.4%) (p = 0.044, cluster log-rank), with patients with SV also possessing significantly greater freedom from coronary revascularization and MI. In conclusion, RA and SV secondary conduits for CABG were associated with comparable immediate postoperative complications and long-term survival after PSM. SV grafting was associated with significantly decreased rates of postoperative MACCE, likely owing to lower rates of coronary revascularization and MI than in RA grafting.

Longer-term impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background The development of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offers a novel treatment option for lowering cardiovascular risk profiles through significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Whilst their effect on improving patients' lipid profiles has been well-established in clinical trials, their impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in the longer-term is of interest since PCSK9 inhibitors are becoming an important addition to the current armament of lipid-lowering therapies. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the longer-term effect (≥ 12 months) of PCSK9 inhibitors on MACE and all-cause mortality, compared to placebo, in patients with dyslipidaemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods A systematic search of databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in January 2023. Two reviewers screened for phase 3 randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies currently in use (alirocumab and evolocumab) to placebo in adult patients. Trials were included if they had a follow-up of at least 12 months from initiation of treatment and reported on MACE or all-cause mortality. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, MACE outcomes such as rates of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, cardiovascular death, hospitalisation for heart failure, hospitalisation for unstable angina, stroke and all-cause mortality outcomes were extracted. A random effects model was used for meta-analysis with dichotomous outcomes reported as odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I² metric to assess heterogeneity. Results The incidence of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation was reported in ten studies (encompassing 57,890 participants) out of the eleven RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant reduction in myocardial infarction (OR -0.27, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.15, p &amp;lt;0.01, I² = 25.5%) and coronary revascularisation (OR -0.20, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.11, p &amp;lt;0.01, I² =12.4%) for patients on PCSK9 inhibitors compared to placebo. Heterogeneity was considered moderate and low respectively for these outcomes. No statistically significant effect was observed for other MACE or all-cause mortality. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that PCSK9 inhibitors can significantly reduce rates of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation in patients over the long-term (≥ 12 months). Further studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to fully evaluate the impact of PCSK9 inhibitors across MACE outcomes, and to inform clinical decision-making.Myocardial Infarction Forest PlotCoronary Revascularisation Forest Plot

Unrealized opportunities for cardiovascular risk reduction with optimized statin and ezetimibe in veterans with coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) do not achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals (1,2). Purpose To quantify unrealized opportunities to improve clinical outcomes of Veterans with CAD through optimized oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) with statins and ezetimibe within the United States Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Methods Veterans with CAD by coronary angiography between 2015 and 2020 were identified, the observed LLT and LDL-C were described, and the observed rates of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were determined. Potential reductions in these events with optimized statin alone or with ezetimibe were modelled based on expected further LDL-C reductions (3). Results The analysis cohort comprised 111,954 Veterans (59.7% statin-treated at baseline angiography) observed for median 3.4 (IQR 2.1-4.0) years. At 6 months, statin prescription increased to 68.7%, but high-intensity statin regimens were prescribed in only 52.9%, ezetimibe use was low (1.1%), and LDL-C remained ≥70 mg/dL in 52.1% of patients. At 4 years, observed incidences (95% CI) of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were 21.6% (21.3-21.8), 5.0% (4.9-5.2), 2.2% (2.1-2.3), and 15.4% (15.2-15.7), respectively (Figure 1). With optimized statin, projected absolute reductions in these incidences were 1.3% (0.9-1.7), 0.8% (0.7-1.0), 0.2% (0.1-0.3), and 2.3% (2.0-2.7). With optimized statin and ezetimibe, projected absolute reductions were 1.8% (1.2-2.4), 1.1% (0.9-1.3), 0.3% (0.2-0.4) and 3.1% (2.6-3.6). Conclusions Suboptimal LLT was prevalent among Veterans with CAD. Meaningful improvements in their cardiovascular outcomes could be achieved with optimized statin alone. Despite lesser lipid-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe, its widespread use on a population level could contribute substantially to cardiovascular risk reduction from intensified oral LLT.Figure 1Figure 2

Repeat coronary revascularization in high-risk patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy after PCI: Insights from the randomized TWILIGHT trial

Abstract Background Repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a major concern, even though its impact on mortality is limited. The effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on this outcome is unclear. Aim To assess the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. DAPT on repeat revascularization after PCI. Methods In the TWILIGHT trial, high-risk patients who were event-free and adherent to a ticagrelor-based DAPT for 3 months after PCI were randomized to ticagrelor plus aspirin or ticagrelor plus placebo for 12 additional months. In this post-hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was repeat revascularization due to recurrent or persistent symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) (Figure). All endpoints were adjudicated and assessed at 12 months after randomization in the per-protocol population. Results Among 6,759 patients, ticagrelor monotherapy and ticagrelor plus aspirin were associated with a similar risk of repeat revascularization (7.1% vs 6.7%, HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89-1.29), TLR, TVR and MACCE (Figure), while NACE was lower with ticagrelor monotherapy. Conclusion In high-risk patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with similar rates of recurrent coronary revascularization and MACCE and a lower risk of NACE compared with continued DAPT.

Revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions in the elderly: what results? - The insights of a multicentre national registry

Abstract Lately, the remarkable progress in knowledge and treatment of cardiovascular diseases has been significantly impacting society's morbidity and mortality. However, the burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains non-negligible. In addition, as a consequence of demographic changes, age, as a non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, makes it increasingly important to focus on the elderly. Up to one-fifth of patients with CAD have a chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a coronary artery, defined as a lesion with 100% stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 that exists for more than 3 months. There is current evidence that successful CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with clinical benefits. However, elderly patients are currently underrepresented in CTO-PCI randomized controlled trials and registries, and its clinical impact and safety in this group of patients are still debated. This study aims to characterise patients submitted to CTO-PCI and compare the baseline characteristics, coronary intervention features, intraprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality between patients younger and older than 75. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients submitted to a CTO-PCI, included in the Portuguese Registry on Interventional Cardiology between January 2019 and December 2022. Comparison tests between groups for parametric and non-parametric variables were performed. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 353 patients who underwent CTO-PCI were analysed, 271 (76.8%) with 18 to 74 years old (group 1) and 82 (23.2%) with 75 or more years old (group 2). Table 1 shows the most important baseline characteristics, with similar features for both groups except body mass index and smoking habits. Table 2 demonstrates the differences between the groups regarding PCI, with the left main and left anterior descending arteries being more treated among older patients and the right coronary artery in younger patients. Complete coronary revascularization and procedure success rate did not differ significantly between groups (p-value=0.19 and p-value=0.59, respectively). Finally, table 3 presents the main intra-procedural and in-hospital complications, with a significant difference only for occlusion of the side branch, occurring in 2 patients aged over 75 years (p-value=0.01). In conclusion, in our registry, the elderly presents a high success rate in the complete recanalization of CTO lesions, comparable to the group under 75 years of age. However, the presence of side branch occlusion was higher in older patients, without other significant differences in intraprocedural and in-hospital complications, including mortality. Further studies including a large sample and follow-up analysis would be essential to better understand the rate of risks related to PCI-CTO potentially associated with the complexity and comorbidities of the elderly.Table 1Table 2 and 3

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) among patients with stable chest pain has been studied in several trials with conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CCTA first versus direct ICA among patients with stable chest pain, who were initially referred to ICA. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the 2 strategies. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% CIs were computed for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 5727 patients were included, of whom 51.1% were referred to CCTA and 22.5% of patients had evidence of ischemia on a prior functional test. In the follow-up ranging from 1 to 3.5 years, 660 of the 2928 patients randomized to CCTA first underwent ICA (23%). Patients who underwent CCTA had lower rates of coronary revascularization (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.84]; P<0.001) and stroke (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.26-0.98]; P=0.043). Cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.24-1.23]; P=0.146), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.64-1.10]; P=0.198), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.63-1.88]; P=0.768), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.59-1.39]; P=0.669) did not differ significantly between groups. In patients with stable chest pain referred for ICA, CCTA avoided the need for ICA in 77% of patients otherwise referred for ICA. CCTA was associated with a reduction in the rates of coronary revascularization and stroke compared with direct ICA. URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023383143.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes Following Cardiac Stress Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Cardiac stress testing (CST) is commonly performed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet little is known whether such ischemic testing is associated with improved clinical outcomes. We studied patients who underwent their first PCI procedure from October 2008 to December 2016 in Ontario, Canada. Patients who underwent CST from 60 days to 1 year after PCI were compared with those who did not undergo CST. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years after CST. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for potential differences between the study groups. Among the 86,150 included patients, 40,988 (47.6%) underwent CST within 60 days to 1 year after PCI. Patients who underwent CST had higher prescription rates of cardiac medications. At 1 year after CST, rates of cardiac catheterisation and coronary revascularisation were more than double those observed in the nontested group (13.4% vs 5.9%, standardised difference [SD] 0.26, for cardiac catheterisation; 6.6% vs 2.7%, SD 0.19, for PCI). The CST group had a significantly lower primary event rate at 3 years compared without CST (3.9% vs 4.5%, hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93). This population-based study of PCI patients found a small but significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events among patients who received CST. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the specific aspects of care that may be associated with the modestly improved outcomes.

Trends in incidence and clinical outcome of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients with amyloidosis in the United States, 2010–2020

Study objectiveTo assess temporal changes in clinical profile and in-hospital outcome of patients with amyloidosis presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, NSTEMI. Design/settingWe conducted a retrospective observational study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Main outcomesPrimary outcome of interest was trend in adjusted in-hospital mortality in patients with amyloidosis presenting with NSTEMI from 2010 to 2020. Our secondary outcomes were trend in rate of coronary revascularization, and trend in duration of hospitalization. ResultsWe identified 272,896 hospitalizations for amyloidosis. There was a temporal increase in incidence of NSTEMI among patients aged 18-44 years from 15.5 % to 28.0 %, a reverse trend was observed in 45–64 years: 22.1 % to 17.7 %, p = 0.043. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of coronary revascularization from 2010 to 2020; 16.3 % to 14.2 %, p = 0.86. We observed an increased odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI compared to those without NSTEMI (aOR = 2.2, 95 % CI: 1.9–2.6, p < 0.001) but there was a decrease trend in mortality from 21.5 % to 11.3 %, p = 0.013 for trend. Hospitalization duration was also observed to decreased from 14.1 days to 10.9 days during the study period (p = 0.055 for trend). ConclusionIn patients with amyloidosis presenting with NSTEMI, there was increased incidence of NSTEMI among young adults, a steady trend in coronary revascularization, and a decreasing trend of adjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality and length of hospitalization from 2010 to 2020 in the United States.

THU306 Association Of Prediabetes With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Veterans With Obesity

Abstract Disclosure: J. Pendse: None. J. Mathew: None. S. Maidman: None. K. Mangalick: None. A. Ramachandran: None. E. Siddiqui: None. J.O. Aleman Diaz: None. Introduction: Prediabetes occurs frequently in obesity and is independently associated with increased atherosclerosis in nondiabetic patients. We sought to compare the effects of prediabetes on cardiovascular interventions along the glycemic control spectrum in obesity within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest US healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a systematic, retrospective review using the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse through the Veterans Administration Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database. We compared patients with obesity and prediabetes (preDM) to patients with obesity and normoglycemia (NG). Inclusion criteria included a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) &amp;lt; 6.5% between 2000 and 2016. The intervention group included patients with preDM, defined by HbA1c between 5.7% to less than 6.5%, and the control group included patients with NG, defined as HbA1c&amp;lt; 5.7%. The primary endpoint was incidence of coronary revascularization, defined as a composite of percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Secondary outcomes included PCI, CABG, diagnostic cardiac catheterizations, and mortality. Groups were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test or student t-tests when appropriate with alpha set to 0.05, and were assumed to have normal distribution. Results: A total of 137,487 subjects were included in the study, with 91,611 subjects with preDM and 45,876 subjects with NG. The average BMI among the preDM group was 33.8 kg/m2 ± 3.6 and the average BMI among the NG group was 33.4 kg/m2 ± 3.3 (p&amp;lt;0.001). Obesity/preDM subjects had a higher rate of coronary revascularization (6.3%, n=5,749) compared to obesity/NG subjects (3.1%, n=1,408) (p&amp;lt;0.001). From a total of 7,157 revascularized veterans, all-cause mortality rate was increased in preDM subjects (6.6%, n=851) compared to NG subjects (5.8%, n=221) (p&amp;lt;0.001). Obesity/preDM subjects had a higher rate of all-cause mortality (3.9%, n=3607) compared to obesity/NG subjects (2.8%, n= 1273). Also of note, obesity/preDM subjects had higher rates of diagnostic catheterization (11.9%, n=10,858), PCI (5.4%, n=4,913), stent (0.57%, n=528), CABG (1.2%, n=1087) compared with rates in obesity/NG subjects with diagnostic catheterization (7.1%, n=3272), PCI (2.6%, n=1183), stent (0.30%, n=138), and CABG (0.56%, n=258). Evaluating composite cardiovascular outcomes including PCI, stent, and CABG, obesity/preDM subjects had higher rates (6.3%, n=5749) compared with obesity/NG subjects (3.1%, n=1408). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, we have concluded that veterans diagnosed with obesity/preDM had higher rates of composite cardiovascular outcomes, including significantly higher rates of coronary revascularization procedures, overall mortality, and mortality following revascularization compared to veterans with obesity/NG. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Projected Outcomes of Optimized Statin and Ezetimibe Therapy in US Military Veterans with Coronary Artery Disease

Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) do not achieve the guideline-directed goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. To estimate reductions in the rates of adverse events associated with CAD in a large US military veteran population that may be achieved through use of optimized statin therapy alone or with ezetimibe compared with the prevailing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). In this observational cohort study, US military veterans with CAD were identified by coronary angiography between June 2015 and September 2020 across 82 US Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. The exposures were observed LLT, LLT with an optimized statin regimen, and LLT with optimized statin and ezetimibe. Observed rates of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization, and potential reductions in those outcomes with optimized LLT based on expected further reductions in LDL-C levels and application of formulas from The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. The analysis cohort comprised 111 954 veterans (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [8.8] years; 109 390 men [97.7%]; 91 589 White patients [81.8%]; 17 592 Black patients [15.7%]). The median (IQR) observation period for this study was 3.4 (2.1-4.0) years. At the time of index angiography, 66 877 patients (59.7%) were treated with statin therapy, and 623 patients (0.6%) were treated with ezetimibe. At 6 months, the number of patients with statin prescriptions increased to 74 400 (68.7%), but the number of patients with high-intensity statin prescriptions was only 57 297 (52.9%). At 6 months, ezetimibe use remained low (n = 1168 [1.1%]), and LDL-C levels were 70 mg/dL or more in 56 405 patients (52.1%). At 4 years, observed incidences of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were 21.6% (95% CI, 21.3%-21.8%), 5.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-5.2%), 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%), and 15.4% (95% CI, 15.2%-15.7%), respectively. With optimized statin treatment, projected absolute reductions in these incidences were 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%), 0.8% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%), 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%), and 2.3% (95% CI, 2.0%-2.7%), respectively. With optimized statin and ezetimibe treatment, projected absolute reductions were 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.4%), 1.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.3%), 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.4%), and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.6%), respectively. In this cohort study of veterans with CAD, suboptimal LLT was prevalent in the clinical setting. Optimization of statin therapy was projected to produce clinically relevant reductions in the risks of death and cardiovascular events. Despite a lesser lipid-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe, its widespread use on a population level in conjunction with optimized statin therapy may be associated with further meaningful reductions in cardiovascular risk.

Socioeconomic deprivation and prognostic outcomes in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis using multidimensional socioeconomic status indices

BackgroundLow socioeconomic status (SES) is an important prognosticator amongst patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This paper analysed the effects of SES on ACS outcomes. MethodsMedline and Embase were searched for articles reporting outcomes of ACS patients stratified by SES using a multidimensional index, comprising at least 2 of the following components: Income, Education and Employment. A comparative meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to estimate the risk ratio of all-cause mortality in low SES vs high SES populations, stratified according to geographical region, study year, follow-up duration and SES index. ResultsA total of 29 studies comprising of 301,340 individuals were included, of whom 43.7% were classified as low SES. While patients of both SES groups had similar cardiovascular risk profiles, ACS patients of low SES had significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR:1.19, 95%CI: 1.10–1.1.29, p < 0.001) compared to patients of high SES, with higher 1-year mortality (RR:1.08, 95%CI:1.03–1.13, p = 0.0057) but not 30-day mortality (RR:1.07, 95%CI:0.98–1.16, p = 0.1003). Despite having similar rates of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation ACS, individuals with low SES had lower rates of coronary revascularisation (RR:0.95, 95%CI:0.91–0.99, p = 0.0115) and had higher cerebrovascular accident risk (RR:1.25, 95%CI:1.01–1.55, p = 0.0469). Excess mortality risk was independent of region (p = 0.2636), study year (p = 0.7271) and duration of follow-up (p = 0.0604) but was dependent on the SES index used (p < 0.0001). ConclusionLow SES is associated with increased mortality post-ACS, with suboptimal coronary revascularisation rates compared to those of high SES. Concerted efforts are needed to address the global ACS-related socioeconomic inequity. Registration and protocolThe current study was registered with PROSPERO, ID: CRD42022347987.

Clinical outcomes of a CT protocol for simultaneous examination of the aorta and coronary artery in patients with aortic aneurysm.

In patients with aortic aneurysm (AA), coronary artery disease (CAD) increases the risk of perioperative complications and even asymptomatic CAD isassociated with adverse clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare coronary-aorta CT (CACT) with thoracoabdominal CT angiography (Aorta CT) for CAD management and clinical outcomes in these patients. We enrolled 479 patients undergoing CACT and 693 patients undergoing Aorta CT as an initial CT scan for AA. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years after CT. The secondary outcomes were subsequent CAD management and invasive coronary angiography (CAG). After index CT scan, the CACT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary revascularization compared with the Aorta CT group (10.7% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) but a lower probability of diagnostic CAG among total invasive CAG (32% vs. 55%, p < 0.001). At 3 months after the CT scan, the prescription rates of statins (65.8% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001) and antiplatelet agents (57.6% vs. 43.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the CACT group. During follow-up, the CACT group had a significantly lower incidence of the composite outcome of all-cause death or MI (adjusted HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.78, p = 0.027) than the Aorta CT group. Among patients with AA, CACT was associated with a higher rate of subsequent CAD management and a lower risk of all-cause death or MI compared to Aorta CT. When evaluating with AA using CT, simultaneous coronary and aortic evaluation using CACT would be recommended over Aorta CT.

Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Trends over time.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome. Guidance regarding the optimal management of patients with SCAD has been published over the past 10 years, but the impact on clinical practice has not been evaluated. The present study aims to examine if approaches to invasive management, medical therapy, and vascular imaging have changed over time. This is a retrospective cohort study of 157 patients treated for SCAD between 2005 and 2019 at an academic health system in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We aimed to examine change in management over time, including rates of coronary revascularization, discharge medications, and vascular imaging. Conservative management of SCAD increased over time from 35% before 2013 to 89% in 2019, p < 0.001. Revascularization was associated with younger age, pregnancy-associated SCAD, and lesions of the left main artery, left anterior descending artery, and multiple vessels, p < 0.05 for all. Partial imaging for extracoronary vascular abnormalities ranged from 33% before 2013 to 71% in 2018, p = 0.146. The rate of comprehensive vascular imaging (cross-sectional head to pelvis imaging) remained low in all time categories (10-18%) and did not change over time. Patients who underwent comprehensive imaging were more likely to be diagnosed with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) compared to those with partial imaging (63% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection has changed over time. More patients are being managed conservatively and undergo screening for extracoronary vascular abnormalities such as FMD. Future efforts should focus on improving rates of comprehensive vascular screening.

Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on heart failure hospitalizations after an acute myocardial infarction.

The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can impact the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is associated with higher mortality. Few studies addressed COPD impact on heart failure hospitalisations (HFHs) in AMI survivors. Adult survivors of an AMI between January and June 2014 were identified from the US Nationwide Readmissions Database. The impact of COPD on HFH within 6 months, fatal HFH and the composite of in-hospital HF or 6-month HFH was studied. Of 237,549 AMI survivors, patients with COPD (17.5%) were older, more likely female, had a higher prevalence of cardiac comorbidities and a lower coronary revascularization rate. In-hospital HF was more frequent in patients with COPD (47.0% vs. 25.4%; p < 0.001). HFH within 6 months occured in 12,934 (5.4%) patients, at a 114% higher rate in patients with COPD (9.4% vs. 4.6%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI : 2.01-2.29; p < 0.001), which was attenuated to a 39% higher adjusted risk (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.30-1.49). Findings were consistent across subgroups of age, AMI type, and major HF risk factors. Mortality during a HFH (5.7% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001) and the rate of the composite HF outcome (49.0% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with COPD. COPD was present in 1 of 6 AMI survivors and was associated with worse HF related outcomes. The increased HFH rate in COPD patients was consistent across several clinically relevant subgroups and these findings highlight the need for optimal in-hospital and post-discharge management of these higher-risk patients.

Analysis of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization Rates Made Over 5 Years in Public Institutions in Türkiye.

Coronary angiography is currently the gold standard anatomic imaging method used to diagnose obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. In patients with critical coronary stenosis, surgical or percutaneous revascularization is provided. Normal coronary artery ratio in coronary angiography is an indirect indicator of patient selection quality. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficiency of coronary angiography by examining the revascularization rates according to years in patients who underwent coronary angiography. Revascularization rates will be determined by analyzing retrospectively the number of patients who underwent coronary angiography in our country between 2016 and 2021 and were revascularized interventionally or surgically. The number of patients who underwent percutaneous, surgical, and total revascularization were proportioned to the number of coronary angiography, and their percentages were determined. From 2016 to 2019, there was a continuous increase in the number of coronary angiography. In 2020, the lowest coronary angiography numbers (n = 222.159) of the last 6 years were seen with the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, it was observed that the number of coronary angiography increased again with the relaxation of pandemic measures and the approaching of hospital admissions to old levels. It is seen that revascularization is performed in up to one-third of the patients who underwent coronary angiography. Similar to the rest of the world, revascularization rates as a result of coronary angiography procedures performed in our country are low. With this result, it should not be concluded that coronary angiography is not used effectively; on the contrary, the efficiency of coronary angiography can be increased by more effective use of noninvasive tests.

Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in categories of patients in the UK

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has declined steadily over the last few decades across Europe and North America. Purpose To provide contemporary estimates of long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in different categories of patients in UK. Methods The CTT-UKB micro-simulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration data (CTT: 118,000 participants; 5 years follow-up), and calibrated in the UK Biobank cohort (UKB: 502,000 participants; 9 years follow-up). The model integrates parametric risk equations for incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, diabetes, cancer and vascular and nonvascular death, and projects annually these endpoints and survival using patient characteristics at entry. UKB data and linked primary and hospital care data informed healthcare costs in the model (2020 UK£); 2021 UK NHS Drug Tariff informed statin costs (atorvastatin 40mg at £1.22 and 80mg at £1.68 per 28 tablets); and Health Survey for England data informed health-related quality of life in the model. Previous CTT meta-analysis, atorvastatin dose-response randomized trials, and further meta-analyses of statin trials and cohort studies informed effects of 40mg/80mg atorvastatin therapy daily on rates of incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, vascular death, diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. The model was used to project gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and additional cost per QALY with lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg or 80mg daily in categories of UKB participants by sex, age at statin initiation (40–49; 50–59 and 60–70 years), and 10-year CVD risk (QRISK3 risk (%): &amp;lt;5; 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, ≥20). Further scenarios explored effects of 5-year delay of statin initiation in people under 45 years of age or stopping statin therapy at 80 years of age. Results Across men and women in categories by age and CVD risk, lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg daily was associated with increases in survival by 0.44–1.69 years (0.28–1.02 QALYs), and atorvastatin 80mg daily with increases in survival of 0.45–1.87 years (0.32–1.13 QALYs; Figure 1) with gains larger among participants at higher CVD risk. Both atorvastatin 40mg and 80mg doses were in the range of cost-effective treatments with incremental cost per QALY gained with atorvastatin 40mg daily versus no statin therapy below £7200/QALY and with atorvastatin 80mg vs 40mg daily below £16000/QALY (Figure 2) across all patient categories studied. Compared to lifetime statin therapy, stopping therapy at 80 years of age substantially reduced benefits and was not cost-effective in any patient category studied. Similarly, compared to immediate initiation, 5-year delay of statin therapy in 40–45 years old patients was not a cost-effective. Conclusions In the UK, statin therapy remains highly cost-effective across men and women 40–70 years old, including those at 10-year CVD risk &amp;lt;5%. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK Medical Research Council (MRC), British Heart Foundation