BACKGROUND:The World Health Organization (WHO) in their 2018 guidelines favored a noninterventional approach toward labor process. The active phase of labor will be initiated when the cervix is 5 cm dilated and during obsoleted use of a 1-cm/hour cervical dilation rate as a diagnostic test for abnormal birth outcome.OBJECTIVES:To compare an active interventional labor management approach to a noninterventional labor management approach in nulliparous parturient women in terms of need of intervention, mode of birth, and maternofetal outcome.METHODOLOGY:This randomized control study was conducted at a rural tertiary care hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Nulliparous low-risk pregnant women presenting in latent labor were randomly allocated into two groups on the basis of cervical dilation and labor intervention. WHO 2014 guidelines with partograph were followed in group 1, and 2018 WHO guidelines with labor care guide were followed in group 2.RESULT:Both the groups were comparable with age, parity, and Bishop score at the time of admission. The incidence rates of intervention in the active first stage of labor in group 1 and group 2 were 31% and 10% with an odds ratio 0.192 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.079–0.466), and the rates of lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) in both the groups were 17.6% and 5.8%, respectively. The odds ratio with 95% CI for postpartum haemorrhage and neonatal intensive care unit admission in group 1 compared with group 2 was 0.313 (0.061–1.610) and 1.057 (0.143–7.832), respectively.CONCLUSION:This study showed that the shifting of the active first-stage threshold by 1 cm and letting labor progress at its natural pace significantly reduced the need for intervention and affect the feto-maternal outcome positively.