Rate-limiting Step In Protein Synthesis Research Articles

Abstract 3722: Exploring the role of eIF4E in cancer cells with targeted protein degradation

Abstract Initiation of translation is considered the main rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and requires the recognition of 5’ m7G-cap on mature mRNAs and the formation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) multi-protein mRNA cap-binding complex. Formation of this complex requires the interaction of eIF4E and the scaffold protein eIF4G, and RNA helicase eIF4A. This eIF4F complex along with eIF3 mediate the recruitment of the 40S ribosomal particle to the 5′ cap of mRNA. Activation of eIF4E is a regulatory hub of many major oncogenic pathways, thus, targeting eIF4E has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy in cancer. Here we have used a targeted protein degradation approach coupled with genetic rescue to explore the molecular and cellular dependency of cancer cells on eIF4E. Stable H1299 human NSCLC clones expressing FKBP12F36V-tagged eIF4E but lacking endogenous eIF4E were established. Treatment of multiple N- or C-tagged-eIF4E clones with dTAGv-1, an FKBP12F36V selective heterobifunctional molecule that recruits VHL, induced rapid degradation of eIF4E to undetectable levels by 6hr exposure. This also resulted in reduced expression of MCL1, a previously reported biomarker of eIF4E activity. Longer exposures to dTAGv-1 resulted in a cytostasis that was not associated with cell death. A diastereomer negative control of dTAGv-1 that cannot recruit VHL did not elicit loss of eIF4E or the downstream events associated with its loss. Global analysis of protein synthesis initiation by RIBOseq and proteome profiling following dTAGv-1 treatment out to 32hr exposure demonstrated surprisingly few alterations in protein expression despite the significant effect on cancer cell growth. We also expressed wild-type or eIF4E mutants predicted to disrupt key functions and determined their ability to rescue molecular or cellular phenotype associate with eIF4E-loss following dTAGv-1 treatment. Expression of wild-type eIF4E completely rescued cell growth and MCL1 expression. A W56A mutant predicted to disrupt mRNA-cap binding was unable to rescue eIF4E loss. In contrast, expression of W73F or S290A mutants (predicted to disrupt eIF4G binding or exhibit reduced eIF4E activity, respectively) were able to rescue the loss of eIF4E. In summary, our rescue experiments show that mRNA-cap binding by eIF4E is required and that eIF4E:eIF4G interaction in cells may be more complex than predicted. This may also explain the challenges associated with developing selective and cellularly potent inhibitors of the eIF4E:eIF4G interaction and that targeting mRNA-cap binding may be a more effective strategy. We predicted that removing eIF4E would impact on the global synthesis of many proteins. However, our data demonstrate that targeting eIF4E leads to limited effects on protein synthesis that remain sufficient to inhibit cancer cell growth. Further experiments are underway to understand which proteins drive this dependency on eIF4E. Citation Format: Swee Y. Sharp, Marianna Martella, Christopher I. Milton, George Ward, Caroline Richardson, Andrew Woodhead, Paul A. Clarke. Exploring the role of eIF4E in cancer cells with targeted protein degradation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3722.

Neuronal RNA-Binding Protein HuD Interacts with Translation Initiation Factor eIF3.

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and is the main target of translation regulation. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key mediators of the spatiotemporal control of translation and are critical for cell proliferation, development, and differentiation. We have previously shown that HuD, one of the neuronal RBPs, enhances cap-dependent translation through the direct interaction with eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) and poly(A) tail using a HeLa-derived in vitro translation system. We have also found that translation stimulation of HuD is essential for HuD-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. However, it remains unclear how HuD is involved in the regulation of translation initiation. Here, we report that HuD binds to eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) via the eIF3b subunit, which belongs to the functional core of mammalian eIF3. eIF3 plays an essential role in recruiting the 40S ribosomal subunit onto mRNA in translation initiation. We hypothesize that the interaction between HuD and eIF3 stabilizes the translation initiation complex and increases translation efficiency. We also showed that the linker region of HuD is required for the interaction with eIF3b. Moreover, we found that eIF3b-binding region of HuD is conserved in all Hu proteins (HuB, HuC, HuD, and HuR). These data might also help to explain how Hu proteins stimulate translation in a cap- and poly(A)-dependent way.

TASEP modelling provides a parsimonious explanation for the ability of a single uORF to derepress translation during the integrated stress response.

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis that is downregulated during the Integrated Stress Response (ISR). Previously, we demonstrated that most human mRNAs that are resistant to this inhibition possess translated upstream open reading frames (uORFs), and that in some cases a single uORF is sufficient for the resistance. Here we developed a computational model of Initiation Complexes Interference with Elongating Ribosomes (ICIER) to gain insight into the mechanism. We explored the relationship between the flux of scanning ribosomes upstream and downstream of a single uORF depending on uORF features. Paradoxically, our analysis predicts that reducing ribosome flux upstream of certain uORFs increases initiation downstream. The model supports the derepression of downstream translation as a general mechanism of uORF-mediated stress resistance. It predicts that stress resistance can be achieved with long slowly decoded uORFs that do not favor translation reinitiation and that start with initiators of low leakiness.

Toeprinting Analysis of Translation Initiation Complex Formation on Mammalian mRNAs.

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and represents a key point at which cells regulate their protein output. Regulation of protein synthesis is the key to cellular stress-response, and dysregulation is central to many disease states, such as cancer. For instance, although cellular stress leads to the inhibition of global translation by attenuating cap-dependent initiation, certain stress-response proteins are selectively translated in a cap-independent manner. Discreet RNA regulatory elements, such as cellular internal ribosome entry sites (IRESes), allow for the translation of these specific mRNAs. Identification of such mRNAs, and the characterization of their regulatory mechanisms, have been a key area in molecular biology. Toeprinting is a method for the study of RNA structure and function as it pertains to translation initiation. The goal of toeprinting is to assess the ability of in vitro transcribed RNA to form stable complexes with ribosomes under a variety of conditions, in order to determine which sequences, structural elements, or accessory factors are involved in ribosome binding-a pre-cursor for efficient translation initiation. Alongside other techniques, such as western analysis and polysome profiling, toeprinting allows for a robust characterization of mechanisms for the regulation of translation initiation.

Dynamics of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation

Temporally and spatially accurate protein synthesis is the key to maintain healthy cell physiology. The initiation phase of translation in eukaryotic organisms is the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis, where more than 20 polypeptides coordinate the assembly of an elongation-competent ribosomal complex on the mRNA template. Such a complex process is at the heart of translational control, and mis-regulation at this stage is linked to numerous human diseases including cancer. Unfortunately, our understanding of the mechanisms of initiation and its regulation is hindered by the lack of a dynamic picture the process. Here, we have developed in vitro single-molecule fluorescence methods to determine key compositional events and conformational dynamics during yeast translation initiation. We have fluorescently labeled mRNAs, tRNAs, protein factors and ribosomes to track initiation in real time. Our results provide a dynamic framework for better understanding translational control and regulation in eukaryotes.

EIF3 Regulation of Protein Synthesis, Tumorigenesis, and Therapeutic Response.

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and highly regulated. Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is the largest and most complex initiation factor consisting of 13 putative subunits. A growing number of studies suggest that eIF3 and its subunits may represent a new group of proto-oncogenes and associates with prognosis. They regulate translation of a subset of mRNAs involved in many cellular processes including proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, and cell cycle. Therefore, unveiling the mechanisms of eIF3 action in tumorigenesis may help identify attractive targets for cancer therapy. Here, we describe a series of methods used in the study of eIF3 function in regulating protein synthesis, tumorigenesis, and cellular response to therapeutic treatments.

Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligands ModulateCardiovirus encephalomyocarditis virusInternal Ribosome Entry Site Activity

The use of small molecules to modulate cellular processes is a powerful approach to investigate gene function as a complement to genetic approaches. The discovery and characterization of compounds that modulate translation initiation, the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis, is important both to provide tool compounds to explore this fundamental biological process and to further evaluate protein synthesis as a therapeutic target. While most messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) recruit ribosomes via their 5' cap, some viral and cellular mRNAs initiate protein synthesis via an alternative "cap-independent" mechanism utilizing internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) elements, which are complex mRNA secondary structures, localized within the 5' nontranslated region of the mRNA upstream of the AUG start codon. This report describes the design of a functional, high throughput screen of small molecules miniaturized into a 1,536-well format and performed using the luciferase reporter gene under control of the viral Cardiovirus encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) IRES element to identify nontoxic compounds modulating translation initiated from the EMCV IRES. One activating compound, validated in a dose response manner, has previously been shown to bind the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Subsequent testing of additional GR modulators further supported this as the possible mechanism of action. Detailed characterization of this compound activity supported the notion that this was due to an effect at the level of translation.

Translation initiation in the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus: eukaryotic features but bacterial route

The formation of the translation initiation complex represents the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis. Translation initiation in the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus depends on several translation IFs (initiation factors), some of which have eukaryal but no bacterial counterparts. In the present paper, we review the current knowledge of the structure, function and evolution of the IFs in S. solfataricus in the context of eukaryotic and bacterial orthologues. Despite similarities between eukaryotic and S. solfataricus IFs, the sequence of events in translation initiation in S. solfataricus follows the bacterial mode.

Emerging therapeutics targeting mRNA translation.

A defining feature of many cancers is deregulated translational control. Typically, this occurs at the level of recruitment of the 40S ribosomes to the 5'-cap of cellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs), the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis, which is controlled by the heterotrimeric eukaryotic initiation complex eIF4F. Thus, eIF4F in particular, and translation initiation in general, represent an exploitable vulnerability and unique opportunity for therapeutic intervention in many transformed cells. In this article, we discuss the development, mode of action and biological activity of a number of small-molecule inhibitors that interrupt PI3K/mTOR signaling control of eIF4F assembly, as well as compounds that more directly block eIF4F activity.

Reversing chemoresistance by small molecule inhibition of the translation initiation complex eIF4F

Deregulation of cap-dependent translation is associated with cancer initiation and progression. The rate-limiting step of protein synthesis is the loading of ribosomes onto mRNA templates stimulated by the heterotrimeric complex, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4F. This step represents an attractive target for anticancer drug discovery because it resides at the nexus of the TOR signaling pathway. We have undertaken an ultra-high-throughput screen to identify inhibitors that prevent assembly of the eIF4F complex. One of the identified compounds blocks interaction between two subunits of eIF4F. As a consequence, cap-dependent translation is inhibited. This compound can reverse tumor chemoresistance in a genetically engineered lymphoma mouse model by sensitizing cells to the proapoptotic action of DNA damage. Molecular modeling experiments provide insight into the mechanism of action of this small molecule inhibitor. Our experiments validate targeting the eIF4F complex as a strategy for cancer therapy to modulate chemosensitivity.

FOXO1 Regulates the Expression of 4E-BP1 and Inhibits mTOR Signaling in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is regulated by growth factors to promote protein synthesis. In mammalian skeletal muscle, the Forkhead-O1 transcription factor (FOXO1) promotes catabolism by activating ubiquitin-protein ligases. Using C2C12 mouse myoblasts that stably express inducible FOXO1-ER fusion proteins and transgenic mice that specifically overexpress constitutively active FOXO1 in skeletal muscle (FOXO(++/+)), we show that FOXO1 inhibits mTOR signaling and protein synthesis. Activation of constitutively active FOXO1 induced the expression of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) mRNA via binding to the promoter. This resulted in an increased total 4E-BP1 abundance and a reduced 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/46) phosphorylation. The reduction in 4E-BP1 phosphorylation was associated with a reduction in the abundance of Raptor and mTOR proteins, Raptor-associated mTOR, reduced phosphorylation of the downstream protein p70S6 kinase, and attenuated incorporation of [(14)C]phenylalanine into protein. The FOXO(++/+) mice, characterized by severe skeletal muscle atrophy, displayed similar patterns of mRNA expression and protein abundance to those observed in the constitutively active FOXO1 C2C12 myotubes. These data suggest that FOXO1 may be an important therapeutic target for human diseases where anabolism is impaired.

Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein NSP3 Is Not Required for Viral Protein Synthesis

Initiation is the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis and therefore an important target for regulation. For the initiation of translation of most cellular mRNAs, the cap structure at the 5' end is bound by the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), while the poly(A) tail, at the 3' end, is recognized by the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). eIF4G is a scaffold protein that brings together eIF4E and PABP, causing the circularization of the mRNA that is thought to be important for an efficient initiation of translation. Early in infection, rotaviruses take over the host translation machinery, causing a severe shutoff of cell protein synthesis. Rotavirus mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail but have instead a consensus sequence at their 3' ends that is bound by the viral nonstructural protein NSP3, which also interacts with eIF4GI, using the same region employed by PABP. It is widely believed that these interactions lead to the translation of rotaviral mRNAs, impairing at the same time the translation of cellular mRNAs. In this work, the expression of NSP3 in infected cells was knocked down using RNA interference. Unexpectedly, under these conditions the synthesis of viral proteins was not decreased, while the cellular protein synthesis was restored. Also, the yield of viral progeny increased, which correlated with an increased synthesis of viral RNA. Silencing the expression of eIF4GI further confirmed that the interaction between eIF4GI and NSP3 is not required for viral protein synthesis. These results indicate that NSP3 is neither required for the translation of viral mRNAs nor essential for virus replication in cell culture.

A molecular switch for translational control in taste memory consolidation

In a variety of species memory consolidation following different learning paradigms has been shown to be dependent on protein synthesis. However, it is not known whether modulation of protein synthesis is a critical component of the consolidation process, nor is the identity of any protein(s) subject to translational regulation, known. We report here that phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor-2 (eEF2), an indicator for translational elongation attenuation, is correlated with input that produces taste memory consolidation in the relevant cortex of rat. The temporal pattern of eEF2 phosphorylation is similar to extra-cellular regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) activation and S6K1 phosphorylation, which are known to stimulate translation initiation. In addition, increased eEF2 phosphorylation and increased alphaCaMKII expression is detected in a synaptoneurosomal fraction made from taste cortex following memory consolidation. These results suggest that increased initiation rate together with decreased elongation rate, during memory consolidation, shift the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis, to produce a local switch-like effect in the expression of neuronal proteins.

Translation Initiation Factor (eIF) 4B Affects the Rates of Binding of the mRNA m7G Cap Analogue to Wheat Germ eIFiso4F and eIFiso4F·PABP

Previous kinetic binding studies of wheat germ protein synthesis eukaryotic translational initiation factor eIFiso4F and its subunit, eIFiso4E, with m(7)GTP and mRNA analogues indicated that binding occurred by a two-step process with the first step occurring at a rate close to the diffusion-controlled rate [Sha, M., Wang, Y., Xiang, T., van Heerden, A., Browning, K. S., and Goss, D. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29904-29909]. The kinetic effects of eIF4B, PABP, and wheat germ eIFiso4F with two mRNA cap analogues and the temperature dependence of this reaction were measured and compared. The Arrhenius activation energies for binding of the two mRNA cap analogues, Ant-m(7)GTP and m(7)GpppG, were significantly different. Fluorescence stopped-flow studies of the eIFiso4F.eIF4B protein complex with two m(7)G cap analogues show a concentration-independent conformational change. The rate of this conformational change was approximately 2.4-fold faster for the eIFiso4F.eIF4B complex compared with our previous studies of eIFiso4F [Sha, M., Wang, Y., Xiang, T., van Heerden, A., Browning, K. S., and Goss, D. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29904-29909]. The dissociation rates were 3.7- and 5.4-fold slower for eIFiso4F.Ant-m(7)GTP and eIFiso4F.m(7)GpppG, respectively, in the presence of eIF4B and PABP. These studies show that eIF4B and PABP enhance the interaction with the cap and probably are involved in protein-protein interactions as well. The temperature dependence of the cap binding reaction was markedly reduced in the presence of either eIF4B or PABP. However, when both eIF4B and PABP were present, not only was the energy barrier reduced but the binding rate was faster. Since cap binding is thought to be the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis, these two proteins may perform a critical function in regulation of the overall protein synthesis efficiency. This suggests that the presence of both proteins leads to a rapid, stable complex, which serves as a scaffold for further initiation complex formation.

Role of eIF3 p170 in controlling synthesis of ribonucleotide reductase M2 and cell growth.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is a rate-limiting step in protein synthesis. It is a complicated process that involves many eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Altering the expression level or the function of eIFs may influence the synthesis of some proteins and consequently cause abnormal cell growth and malignant transformation. P170, the largest putative subunit of eIF3, has been found elevated in human breast, cervical, esophageal, and lung cancers, suggesting that p170 may have a potential role in malignant transformation and/or cell growth control. Our recent studies suggested that p170 is likely a translational regulator and it may mediate the effect of mimosine on the translation of a subset mRNAs. Mimosine, a plant nonprotein amino acid, inhibits mammalian DNA synthesis, an essential event of cell growth. The rate-limiting step in DNA synthesis is the conversion of the ribonucleotides to their corresponding deoxyribonucleotides catalysed by ribonucleotide reductase of which the activity is regulated by the level of its M2 subunit. It has been reported that inhibiting the activity of M2 also inhibits cell growth. To understand the relationship between protein and DNA synthesis and between p170 and cell growth control, we investigated in this study whether p170 regulates the synthesis of M2 and, thus, cell growth. We found that altering the expression level of p170 changes the synthesis rate of both M2 and DNA. Decreasing p170 expression in human lung cancer cell line H1299 and breast cancer cell line MCF7 significantly reversed their malignant growth phenotype. However, the overall [35S]methionine incorporation following dramatic decrease in p170 expression was only approximately 25% less than the control cells. These observations, together with our previous findings, suggest that p170 may regulate the translation of a subset mRNAs and its elevated expression level may be important for cancer cell growth and for maintaining their malignant phenotype.

Reactive Oxygen Species Sensitivity of Angiotensin II-dependent Translation Initiation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Translation initiation, the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis, is a key event in vascular smooth muscle cell growth, a major component of vascular disease. Translation initiation is regulated by interaction between PHAS-I and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). Although angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy requires the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the ROS sensitivity of these events and their upstream activators remain unclear. Here, we investigated the role of ROS in the regulation of PHAS-I phosphorylation on Thr-70 and Ser-65, an event required for the release of eIF4E from PHAS-I. Ang II-induced Ser-65 phosphorylation was ROS-dependent as assessed by pretreatment with ebselen (3.6 +/- 0.2 versus 1.1 +/- 0.2), diphenylene iodonium (3.6 +/- 0.2 versus 1.0 +/- 0.1), and N-acetyl cysteine (3.6 +/- 0.2 versus 1.2 +/- 0.1), but Ang II-stimulated phosphorylation of Thr-70 was ROS-insensitive. Although phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway inhibition by LY294004 blocked both Ser-65 and Thr-70 phosphorylation (3.8 +/- 0.1 versus 0.8 +/- 0.1 and 3.2 +/- 0.2 versus 1.0 +/- 0.01, respectively), protein phosphatase 2A inhibition by okadaic acid selectively increased (3.3 +/- 0.1 versus 5.2 +/- 0.1) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition by SB203580 selectively decreased (3.8 +/- 0.1 versus 1.4 +/- 0.3) Ser-65 phosphorylation. Dominant negative Akt adenovirus also inhibited only Ser-65 phosphorylation (3.7 +/- 0.1 versus 1.0 +/- 0.03). These results demonstrate a unique differential ROS sensitivity of two separate residues on PHAS-I, which seems to be explained by the selective involvement of distinct signaling pathways in the regulation of these phosphorylation events.

Augmentation of Wound Healing with Translation Initiation Factor eIF4E mRNA

Background. Initiation of translation is the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis; eIF4E increases translational efficiency by facilitating ribosome scanning. eIF4E is present in cells in rate-limiting amounts; chronic overexpression of eIF4E causes cell transformation by upregulating growth-related proteins. Biolistic delivery of epidermal growth factor (EGF) increases wound healing; transiently increasing wound eIF4E levels with biolistic mRNA transmission may further augment wound healing without oncogenesis.Patients and methods. Midline fascial wounds were created in rats and biolistically treated with gold particles carrying mRNA encoding for hEGF with or without eIF4E prior to suture closure; control animals received blank bullets. The animals were sacrificed at 7 or 14 days for determination of peak wound bursting strength on a tensiometer. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation; statistics were via analysis of variance.Results.Conclusions. Simultaneous biolistic delivery of EGF mRNA with eIF4E mRNA significantly increases wound breaking strength compared to that in control animals or treatment with EGF mRNA alone without risk of cellular transformation. Further studies of translational activation to augment wound healing are warranted.

Initiator tRNA and its role in initiation of protein synthesis.

The initiation step of protein synthesis is quite differentfrom the repetitive steps of elongation that follow it. Initiation involves the assembly of the two ribosomal subunits, mRNA, and the initiator tRNA in a reaction requiring the participation of several initiation factors, and isoften the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis (Kozak1983; Gualerzi and Pon 1990; RajBhandary and Chow1995; Hershey and Merrick 2000). The initiator tRNAplays an important role in this process and in the selectionof the appropriate initiation codon. Because of its specialfunction, an initiator tRNA possesses many highly specific properties that are different from those of elongatortRNAs (RajBhandary 1994). We have been interested inidentifying the sequence and/or structural features in theinitiator tRNA important for specifying its distinctiveproperties and in understanding the molecular basis of thespecific interactions of the initiator tRNA with the various proteins, the initiation factors, and the ribosome.Here we report on our work with the eubacterial Escherichia coli initiator tRNA. We describe briefly the systemthat we use for in vitro and in vivo functional analyses ofmutant initiator tRNAs, a summary of the overall results,and some of our conclusions related to participation ofthe tRNA in initiation.

Progressive amplification and overexpression of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E gene in different zones of head and neck cancers

Purpose: Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binds to mRNA as the initial rate-limiting step in protein synthesis. Amplification and overexpression of the eIF4E gene has been associated with malignant transformation. The objectives of this study were to 1) quantify the eIF4E gene in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) specimens, 2) quantify eIF4E protein elevation and examine its association with eIF4E gene amplification, and 3) determine whether there is progression in eIF4E gene amplification and protein overexpression in the tumor-free resection margin, the transition zone, and the tumor core of HNSCC specimens. Materials and Methods: Eighteen HNSCC specimens were divided into three zones: 1) tumor core; 2) transition zone; and 3) “tumor-free” margin. Competitive polymerase chain reaction was performed to determine eIF4E gene copy number. eIF4E protein expression was quantified using Western blot analysis. Results: All 18 HNSCC specimens tested had significant eIF4E gene amplification (4.3 ± 1.2; P < .05). In contrast, none of the 10 benign specimens from noncancer patients had any eIF4E gene amplification (1.1 ± 0.5). In the 12 HNSCC specimens examined for the three zones, the tumor core and transition zone showed eIF4E gene amplification (5.2 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 0.9, respectively) compared with the “tumor-free” margin (2.1 ± 1.1; P < .05). The tumor core and transition zone showed significant eIF4E protein elevation (15.5 ± 9.3, 4.4 ± 4.6, respectively) compared with the “tumor-free” margin (0.9 ± 0.5, P < .05). Conclusions: The eIF4E gene is amplified and overexpressed in HNSCC. Amplification and elevation of eIF4E were highest in the tumor core, intermediate in the transition zone, and lowest in the tumor-free margin. There appears to be progression of eIF4E gene amplification and overexpression from the “tumor-free” margin to the tumor core.

Maintenance of cellular levels of G-proteins: different efficiencies of alpha s and alpha o synthesis in GH3 cells.

G-proteins couple membrane-bound receptors to intracellular effectors. Each cell has a characteristic complement of G-protein alpha, beta and gamma subunits that partly determines the cell's response to external signals. Very little is known about the mechanisms that set and maintain cellular levels of G-proteins or about potential points of regulation. We have assayed the steady-state levels of mRNA and protein for two types of G-protein subunits, alpha s and alpha o, in rat brain, heart and GH3 cells, and found that in all these cases, it takes 9- to 20-fold more mRNA to produce a given amount of alpha s protein than to produce the same amount of alpha o protein. Such a situation could arise from a relatively rapid rate of alpha s protein degradation, requiring rapid protein synthesis to compensate, or from relatively inefficient translation of alpha s mRNA compared with alpha o mRNA. The latter appears to be the case in GH3 cells. These cells contain 94 times more mRNA for alpha s than for alpha o, yet the rate of alpha s protein synthesis is only 9 times greater than alpha o protein synthesis. The degradation rates of the two proteins are similar (13 h for alpha s and 18 h for alpha o). To begin to define the mechanism that accounts for the fact that it takes more mRNA to synthesize a given amount of alpha s than alpha o, we asked whether there is a pool of alpha s mRNA that does not participate in protein synthesis. We found that virtually all alpha s and alpha o mRNA is associated with ribosomes. Therefore, all the mRNA is likely to be capable of directing protein synthesis. Since the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis is usually binding of the ribosome to mRNA at initiation, our results suggest that the relatively slow rate of alpha s protein synthesis is regulated by a mechanism that acts beyond initiation at peptide elongation and/or termination.