Carcinogenicity Studies In Rats Research Articles

Risk Assessment of Pulegone in Foods Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.

This study presents a new risk assessment of pulegone, a substance classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The analysis used data from a two-year carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in 2011. Because of the absence of a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in these studies, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach was employed as an alternative risk assessment method. The lowest BMD lower confidence level (BMDL) of 4.8 mg/kg b.w./day among the eight endpoints served as the point of departure for calculating an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 48 μg/kg b.w./day. This new ADI is significantly lower than the previously established tolerable daily intake of 0.1 mg/kg b.w./day set in 1997. The analysis also considered various genotoxicity studies, which indicate that pulegone's effects follow a nongenotoxic, thresholded mechanism. The estimated intake levels of pulegone in the European Union and USA were below the newly calculated ADI, suggesting a low health risk based on current consumption patterns.

P13-28 Lifetime carcinogenicity studies in Han Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats: historical data for survival, neoplasms and causes of premature death

P13-28 Lifetime carcinogenicity studies in Han Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats: historical data for survival, neoplasms and causes of premature death

Structuring expert review using AOPs: Enabling robust weight-of-evidence assessments for carcinogenicity under ICH S1B(R1)

There is widespread acceptance that non-animal studies can be used to assess chemical safety in humans. These New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) typically integrate data from multiple sources including in silico and in vitro models. Regulatory guidelines are being updated to recognise that these scientific advances are allowing animal studies to be replaced without compromising human safety. One such regulation, ICH S1B(R1), was updated in 2022 to include the provision for a weight-of-evidence assessment for carcinogenicity, using six factors to determine if there was sufficient evidence to waive the need to run a rat carcinogenicity assay. The volume of data and evidence, however, can be hard to organise and interpret into a cohesive evaluation. To aid such assessments, software has been developed that combines adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and reasoning, to organise and contextualise knowledge, and provide an outcome based on the data available. Using this framework, a workflow has been developed to assess the initial outcome and structure expert review to investigate the factors, and potential biological mechanisms which could contribute to a compound’s carcinogenic potential (or lack thereof). The framework was used to structure expert review of three examples of differing activity and levels of supporting evidence. This highlighted where AOPs supported expert review by showing 1) the value in using AOPs to analyse data, 2) the importance of expert review to strengthen confidence in outcomes, and 3) how this approach can accurately predict experimental results. Therefore, using this approach to assess evidence for ICH S1B(R1) will give transparent, scientifically robust, and reproducible calls, and thus reduce the need for rat carcinogenicity studies.

ICH S1 prospective evaluation study and weight of evidence assessments: commentary from industry representatives

Industry representatives on the ICH S1B(R1) Expert Working Group (EWG) worked closely with colleagues from the Drug Regulatory Authorities to develop an addendum to the ICH S1B guideline on carcinogenicity studies that allows for a weight-of-evidence (WoE) carcinogenicity assessment in some cases, rather than conducting a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study. A subgroup of the EWG composed of regulators have published in this issue a detailed analysis of the Prospective Evaluation Study (PES) conducted under the auspices of the ICH S1B(R1) EWG. Based on the experience gained through the Prospective Evaluation Study (PES) process, industry members of the EWG have prepared the following commentary to aid sponsors in assessing the standard WoE factors, considering how novel investigative approaches may be used to support a WoE assessment, and preparing appropriate documentation of the WoE assessment for presentation to regulatory authorities. The commentary also reviews some of the implementation challenges sponsors must consider in developing a carcinogenicity assessment strategy. Finally, case examples drawn from previously marketed products are provided as a supplement to this commentary to provide additional examples of how WoE criteria may be applied. The information and opinions expressed in this commentary are aimed at increasing the quality of WoE assessments to ensure the successful implementation of this approach.

ICH S1 prospective evaluation study: weight of evidence approach to predict outcome and value of 2-year rat carcinogenicity studies. A report from the regulatory authorities subgroup.

Introduction: The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) initiated a process in 2012 to revise the S1B Guideline "Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals". Previous retrospective analysis indicated the importance of histopathological risk factors in chronic toxicity studies, evidence of endocrine perturbation, and positive genetic toxicology results as potentially predictive indicators of carcinogenic risk. In addition, a relationship between pharmacodynamic activity and carcinogenicity outcome in long-term rodent studies has been reported. It was postulated that these factors could be evaluated in a Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) approach to predict the outcome of a 2-year rat study. Methods: The ICH S1B(R1) Expert Working Group (EWG) conducted a Prospective Evaluation Study (PES) to determine the regulatory feasibility of this WoE approach. Drug Regulatory Authorities (DRAs) evaluated 49 Carcinogenicity Assessment Documents (CADs), which describe the WoE for submitted pharmaceutical compounds. Each compound was categorized into a carcinogenic risk category including a statement of the value of the 2-year rat study. The outcome of the completed 2-year rat studies was evaluated in relation to the prospective CAD to determine the accuracy of predictions. Results: Based on the results of the PES, the EWG concluded that the evaluation process for assessing human carcinogenic risk of pharmaceuticals described in ICH S1B could be expanded to include a WoE approach. Approximately 27% of 2-year rat studies could be avoided in cases where DRAs and sponsors unanimously agreed that such a study would not add value. Discussion: Key factors supporting a WoE assessment were identified: data that inform carcinogenic potential based on drug target biology and the primary pharmacologic mechanism of the parent compound and major human metabolites; results from secondary pharmacology screens for this compound and major human metabolites that inform carcinogenic risk; histopathology data from repeated-dose toxicity studies; evidence for hormonal perturbation; genotoxicity data; and evidence of immune modulation. The outcome of the PES indicates that a WoE approach can be used in place of conducting a 2-year rat study for some pharmaceuticals. These data were used by the ICH S1B(R1) EWG to write the R1 Addendum to the S1B Guideline published in August 2022.

Developing a pragmatic consensus procedure supporting the ICH S1B(R1) weight of evidence carcinogenicity assessment.

The ICH S1B carcinogenicity global testing guideline has been recently revised with a novel addendum that describes a comprehensive integrated Weight of Evidence (WoE) approach to determine the need for a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study. In the present work, experts from different organizations have joined efforts to standardize as much as possible a procedural framework for the integration of evidence associated with the different ICH S1B(R1) WoE criteria. The framework uses a pragmatic consensus procedure for carcinogenicity hazard assessment to facilitate transparent, consistent, and documented decision-making and it discusses best-practices both for the organization of studies and presentation of data in a format suitable for regulatory review. First, it is acknowledged that the six WoE factors described in the addendum form an integrated network of evidence within a holistic assessment framework that is used synergistically to analyze and explain safety signals. Second, the proposed standardized procedure builds upon different considerations related to the primary sources of evidence, mechanistic analysis, alternative methodologies and novel investigative approaches, metabolites, and reliability of the data and other acquired information. Each of the six WoE factors is described highlighting how they can contribute evidence for the overall WoE assessment. A suggested reporting format to summarize the cross-integration of evidence from the different WoE factors is also presented. This work also notes that even if a 2-year rat study is ultimately required, creating a WoE assessment is valuable in understanding the specific factors and levels of human carcinogenic risk better than have been identified previously with the 2-year rat bioassay alone.

A carcinogenicity study of diphenylarsinic acid in C57BL/6J mice in drinking water for 78 weeks.

Diphenylarsinic acid (DPAA), a neurotoxic organic arsenical, is present in groundwater and soil in some regions of Japan owing to illegal dumping. The present study evaluated the potential carcinogenicity of DPAA, including investigating whether bile duct hyperplasia in the liver that was observed in a chronic study on 52 week mouse, develops into a tumor when administered to mice in their drinking water for 78 weeks. DPAA was administered to 4 groups of male and female C57BL/6J mice at concentrations of 0, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 ppm in drinking water for 78 weeks. A significant decrease in the survival rate was found for females in the 25 ppm DPAA group. Body weights of males in the 25 ppm and females in the 12.5 and 25 ppm DPAA groups were significantly lower than those of the controls. Histopathological evaluation of neoplasms in all tissues showed no significant increase in tumor incidence in any organ or tissue of 6.25, 12.5, or 25 ppm DPAA-treated male or female mice. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that DPAA is not carcinogenic to male or female C57BL/6J mice. Taken together with the fact that the toxic effect of DPAA is predominantly restricted to the central nervous system in humans, and the finding that DPAA was not carcinogenic in a previous 104-week rat carcinogenicity study, our results suggest that DPAA is unlikely to be carcinogenic in humans.

Regulatory Experience Assessing the Carcinogenic Potential of a Monoclonal Antibody Inhibiting PCSK9, Bococizumab, Including a 2-Year Carcinogenicity Study in Rats.

Bococizumab is an anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibody that was intended for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. After reviewing the 6-month rat toxicity study data, in which there was a low spontaneous tumor incidence, unrelated to bococizumab administration, the U.S. FDA granted a carcinogenicity waiver request based on a weight-of-evidence assessment of low carcinogenic risk. Subsequently, after reviewing 6-month rat toxicity study data from another anti-PCSK9 antibody, RN317, with a similar low tumor incidence (unrelated to RN317), the U.S. FDA rescinded the bococizumab carcinogenicity study waiver and requested a full 2-year rat carcinogenicity study be conducted. The resulting 2-year carcinogenicity study demonstrated no bococizumab-related increase in tumors, confirming the weight-of-evidence evaluation and alleviating concerns regarding the carcinogenic potential. Here we report the scientific and regulatory background that led to the request for a rat carcinogenicity study, the feedback on the design of the carcinogenicity study, and the results from this study which affirmed the original weight-of-evidence assessment of low carcinogenic risk.

Re-Assessment of the Plant Protection Product PROMAN – with the Active Ingredient Metobromuron [Edition 2

Proman is a broad spectrum selective herbicide for potatoes grown outdoors, containing the active substance metobromuron. VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products has previously discussed questions concerning Proman raised by The Norwegian Food Safety Authority, and stated its opinion in a report of 21. January 2015 (http://www.vkm.no/dav/3c64afe035.pdf). 
 Following this report, The Norwegian Food Safety Authority turned down the application to register Proman as a plant protection product in Norway. The applicant filed a complaint on this decision, and the VKM Panel has been asked to reassess its previous opinion in light of the information given by the applicant in the complaint. 
 The VKM Panel has discussed the arguments put forward in the complaint. The arguments did not change the Panel’s main conclusions in the original assessment. Some changes in the wording of the conclusions were however done, in order to put more emphasis on areas of uncertainty. 
 These are the standing conclusions of VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products:
 
 On the relevance of the carcinogenic effects observed in the rat carcinogenicity study; fibrosarcomas in females and pheochromocytomas and Leydig cell tumours in males: 
 It is the opinion of VKM’s Panel for Plant Protection Products that the relevance of the observed incidences of mammary gland tumours and Leydig cell tumours in the rat carcinogenicity study is strengthened by the fact that the increases in tumours associated with exposure to metobromuron are observed in hormone responsive tissues. The panel concludes that the carcinogenic effects observed in the rat carcinogenicity study could be relevant for tumour induction in humans. 
 Higher incidences of still dumbbell-shaped centres of thoracic vertebrae and nonossification of the 13th rib observed in the rat developmental toxicity study and whether these are considered to be malformations: 
 VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products has discussed the classification of the different types of incomplete ossifications and concluded that incomplete ossification of sternebrae and non-ossification of the 13th rib in rats should by itself be considered to be variations, and not adverse developmental effects. On the other hand, the Panel agrees with ECHA that the “thoracic vertebral centres still dumbbell-shaped” should be considered as malformations, due to limited data and understanding of the mechanism underlying the observed slow reversal of these anomalies. Furthermore, it is the view of the Panel that the different types of retarded ossification induced by the exposure should be considered as a whole when assessing for developmental effects. 
 Establishment of the NOAEL for the developmental toxicity study in rats and the reference value (ARfD): 
 VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products supports the proposal of an ADI value of 0.008 mg/kg bw/day based on a NOAEL of 0.8 mg/kg bw/day from the 2-year study in mouse, and AOEL of 0.016 mg/kg bw/day based on the NOAEL of 1.6 mg/kg bw/day from the 1-year feeding study in dog. The panel suggests an alternative ARfD value of 0.03 mg/kg bw based on a LOAEL of 10 mg/kg bw /day for the observations of incomplete ossification in the rat developmental study. 
 The anti-androgenic potential of metobromuron: 
 The rat carcinogenicity study indicates that metobromuron may interact with the endocrine system. The data from the Hershberger in vivo rat study, the in vitro studies, as well as the comparison with demonstrated effects and mechanisms for flutamide and linuron is suggestive of an anti-androgenic effect. Thus, it is the opinion of the VKM Panel on Plant Protection Products that an anti-androgenic effect of metobromuron cannot be excluded.

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors With Parietal Cell Atrophy in a Long-term Carcinogenicity Study in Rats.

Malignant neuroendocrine tumors were diagnosed in the stomach of two out of sixty female Sprague-Dawley rats treated for 89 weeks with a high dose of a novel, small molecule, cannabinoid-1 antagonist. The tumors were associated with parietal cell atrophy accompanied by foveolar hyperplasia of the glandular stomach mucosa. Parietal cell atrophy/foveolar hyperplasia was considered test article related at the high dose, given the higher incidence and severity relative to untreated controls, although the precise mechanism of the parietal cell atrophy was undetermined. Spontaneous gastric neuroendocrine tumors are very rare in rats, and the current cases were considered secondary to parietal cell atrophy causing reduced gastric acid secretion and subsequent overstimulation of gastrin release through a feedback loop.

Role and potential of histopathological specimens in the toxicological evaluation of pharmaceuticals and chemicals

With the development of molecular-targeted drugs, the demand for utilization of histopathological specimens and pathological diagnosis is increasing in the field of clinical pathology. In particular, in case of companion diagnostics, the results of immunohistochemical staining have become beyond diagnostic assistance, definitive diagnosis, and now indispensable for selection of therapeutic agents. Histopathological examination also serves an important role in non-clinical toxicological evaluation. Particularly, it is pivotal for obtaining data on organ-specific toxicity and carcinogenicity. On the other hand, a weight of evidence approach is currently being considered in International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) S1 as an option to replace the 2-year rat carcinogenicity study, in which case the evaluation of the 26-week-repeated dose toxicity study will be more important. In this article, We would like to introduce the usefulness of γ-H2AX-based rat bladder carcinogenicity evaluation using histopathological specimens obtain from 28-day repeated-dose study and the application of mass spectrometric imaging currently under consideration in our laboratory, thus discuss the role of histopathological examination in non-clinical toxicological and safety evaluation and its future perspective.

An evaluation of carcinogenicity predictors from short-term and sub chronic repeat-dose studies of agrochemicals in rats: Opportunities to refine and reduce animal use

The aim of this study was to examine whether short term, repeat dose, rat studies provide sufficient information about potential carcinogenicity to enable predictions about the carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals to be made earlier in compound development. This study aimed to identify any correlations between toxicity findings obtained for short term rat studies (28 day and 90 day) and neoplastic findings obtained from 24 month rat carcinogenicity studies for agrochemical compounds (18 compounds) tested in Han Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats. The macroscopic pathology, microscopic pathology, hematology, biochemistry, organ weights, estrogen receptor activation and genotoxicity results were examined. Seven out of 18 non genotoxic compounds developed tumors in treated rats in the carcinogenicity study and of these, two compounds showed no preneoplastic findings in the affected tissues (false negatives). Of the remaining five true positives, correlations were noted between corneal opacity and keratitis (90 day study) as early indicators of squamous cell carcinoma and papilloma of the cornea of the eye (compound 1, a hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor) and inflammation of the stomach and kidney (90 day study) and gastric squamous cell papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma and renal tubular adenoma and carcinoma, respectively (compound 12, a fungicide with multisite activity). Minor decreases in uterine weight and increases in estradiol hydroxylation activity at 28 days were associated with endometrial adenocarcinoma (compound 18, a mitochondrial complex II electron transport inhibitor). Early liver weight increases and hepatocellular centrilobular hypertrophy (28 day study) were associated with thyroid follicular adenomas (compound 11, a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) in female animals only. Hepatic centrilobular hypertrophy (28 day studies) correlated with thyroid adenomas in males in carcinogenicity studies (compound 2, a hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor). In contrast, treatment related, nasopharynx tumors (compound 3, an elongase inhibitor) and uterine adenocarcinoma (compound 9, a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) could not be correlated with findings from the short term studies examined. Eleven compounds displayed preneoplastic findings with no tumors (false positives) and there were no compounds with no preneoplastic findings and no tumors (true negatives). This work indicates the value of examining historical, short term studies for specific, nonneoplastic findings which correlate with tumors in carcinogenicity studies, which may obviate the need for further animal carcinogenicity studies.

A rat subchronic study transcriptional point of departure estimates a carcinogenicity study apical point of departure

Considerations of human relevance and animal use are driving research to identify new approaches to inform risk assessment of chemicals and replace guideline-based rodent carcinogenicity tests. Here, the hypothesis was tested across four agrochemicals that 1) a rat 90-day transcriptome-based BEPOD is protective of a rat carcinogenicity study and 2) a subchronic liver or kidney BEPOD would approximate a cancer bioassay apical POD derived from other organs and a rat subchronic BEPOD would approximate a mouse cancer bioassay apical POD. Using RNA sequencing and BMDExpress software, liver and/or kidney BEPOD values were generated in male rats exposed for 90 days to either Triclopyr Acid, Pronamide, Sulfoxaflor, or Fenpicoxamid. BEPOD values were compared to benchmark dose-derived apical POD values generated from rat 90-day and rodent carcinogenicity studies. Across all four agrochemicals, findings showed that a rat 90-day study BEPOD approximated the most sensitive apical POD (within 10-fold) generated from the 90-day rat study and long-term rodent carcinogenicity studies. This study supports the conclusion that a subchronic transcriptome-based BEPOD could be utilized to estimate an apical POD within a risk-based approach of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity agrochemical assessment, abrogating the need for time- and resource-intensive rodent carcinogenicity studies and minimizing animal testing.

Long-Term Nonclinical Pulmonary Safety Assessment of Afrezza, a Novel Insulin Inhalation Powder.

Afrezza delivers inhaled insulin using the Gen2 inhaler for the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 Diabetes. Afrezza was evaluated in long-term nonclinical pulmonary safety studies in 2 toxicology species. Chronic inhalation toxicology studies in rat (26 weeks) and dog (39 weeks) and an inhalation carcinogenicity study in rats were conducted with Technosphere insulin (Afrezza) and with Technosphere alone as a vehicle control. Respiratory tract tissues were evaluated by histopathology and cells expressing proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were quantified in lungs of rats. Microscopic findings in rats exposed to Afrezza were attributed to the Technosphere particle component, were confined to nasal epithelia, and consisted of eosinophilic globules and nasal epithelial degeneration. There were no Afrezza-related changes in pulmonary PCNA labeling indices in alveoli, large bronchioles, or terminal bronchioles. Microscopic findings in rats exposed to Technosphere particles included eosinophilic globules, mucus cell hyperplasia, and epithelial degeneration in the nasal cavities. PCNA labeling indices were increased in large bronchioles and terminal bronchioles but not in alveoli. There were no Technosphere particle-related findings in the dog study. Afrezza did not exhibit carcinogenic potential in the 2-year study in rats. These nonclinical inhalation studies support the use of Afrezza in humans over extended periods.

Risk Assessment of the Plant Protection Product PROMAN – with the Active Ingredient Metobromuron

Proman is a new product containing the active substance metobromuron. The intended use is as a broad spectrum selective herbicide for potatoes grown outdoors.
 VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products has discussed the questions raised by The Norwegian Food Safety Authority in the Terms of reference and has stated the following opinion:
 On the relevance of the carcinogenic effects observed in the rat carcinogenicity study; fibrosarcomas in females and pheochromocytomas and Leydig cell tumours in males:
 It is the opinion of VKM’s Panel for Plant Protection Products that the relevance of the observed incidence in mammary gland tumours and Leydig cell tumours in the rat carcinogenicity study is strengthened by the fact that the tumours are observed in hormone responsive tissues. The panel concludes that the carcinogenic effects observed in the rat carcinogenicity study are likely to be relevant for tumours that are influenced by the endocrine system, also in humans.
 On the higher incidences of still dumbbell-shaped centres of thoracic vertebrae and nonossification of the 13th rib observed in the rat developmental toxicity study and whether these are considered to be malformations:
 VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products has discussed the classification of the different types of incomplete ossifications and concluded that incomplete ossification of sternebrae and non-ossification of the 13th rib in rats should by itself be considered to be variations, and not adverse developmental effects. On the other hand, the Panel agrees with ECHA that the “thoracic vertebral centres still dumbbell-shaped” should be considered as malformations, due to limited data and understanding of the mechanism underlying the observed slow reversal of these anomalies. Furthermore, it is the view of the Panel that the different types of retarded ossification induced by the exposure of metobromuron should be considered as a whole when assessing for developmental effects.
 On the establishment of the NOAEL for the developmental toxicity study in rats and the reference value (ARfD):
 VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products supports the proposal of an ADI value of 0.008 mg/kg bw/day based on a NOAEL of 0.8 mg/kg bw/day from the 2-year study in mouse, and VKM Report 2015: 03 5.
 AOEL of 0.016 mg/kg bw/day based on the NOAEL of 1.6 mg/kg bw/day from the 1-year feeding study in dog. An UF of 100 is applied. The panel suggests on the other hand an ARfD of 0.03 mg/kg bw based on a LOAEL of 10 mg/kg bw /day with the observations of incomplete ossification in the rat developmental study. An UF of 300 is applied.
 On the possible anti-androgenic potential of metobromuron:
 It is the view of the Panel that the rat carcinogenicity study suggests that metobromuron may possess endocrine disrupting potency. The data from the Hershberger in vivo rat study and the in vitro studies is also suggestive of a weak anti-androgenic effect. Thus, it is the opinion of the VKM Panel on Plant Protection Products that an anti-androgenic effect of metobromuron cannot be excluded.

Carcinogenicity Assessment of Daprodustat (GSK1278863), a Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor.

Daprodustat (GSK1278863) is a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) inhibitor in development for treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. Daprodustat's biological activity simulates components of the natural response to hypoxia; inhibition of PHDs results in HIF stabilization and modulation of HIF-controlled gene products, including erythropoietin. The carcinogenic potential of daprodustat was evaluated in 2-year carcinogenicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats and CD-1 mice, where once-daily doses were administered. The mouse study also included evaluation of daprodustat's 3 major circulating human metabolites. There were no neoplastic findings that were considered treatment related in either study. Exaggerated pharmacology resulted in significantly increased red cell mass and subsequent multiorgan congestion and secondary non-neoplastic effects in both species, similar to those observed in chronic toxicity studies. In rats, these included aortic thrombosis and an exacerbation of spontaneous rodent cardiomyopathy, which contributed to a statistically significant decrease in survival in high-dose males (group terminated in week 94). Survival was not impacted in mice at any dose. Systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) to daprodustat at the high doses in rats and mice exceed predicted maximal human clinical exposure by ≥143-fold. These results suggest that daprodustat and metabolites do not pose a carcinogenic risk at clinical doses.

Re-evaluation of benzyl alcohol (E1519) as food additive.

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of benzyl alcohol (E 1519) when used as a food additive. The Panel considered that adequate exposure and toxicity data were available. Benzyl alcohol (E 1519) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. The Panel considered benzyl alcohol of low acute toxicity with no concern with respect to genotoxicity and carcinogenicity and established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 4 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day based on a no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 400 mg/kg bw per day from the carcinogenicity study in rats. The mean and high exposure estimates in the refined exposure scenarios were maximally 0.27 and 0.81 mg/kg bw per day in toddlers, respectively. The exposure estimates to benzyl alcohol (E 1519) were below the ADI of 4 mg/kg bw per day in all population groups. The Panel noted that also the exposure in the regulatory maximum level exposure assessment scenario is below the ADI in all population groups. The Panel concluded that the exposure to benzyl alcohol (E 1519) does not raise a safety concern at the reported uses and use levels.

Safety assessment of central nervous system tumors in 2-year rat carcinogenicity studies

Safety assessment of central nervous system tumors in 2-year rat carcinogenicity studies

AhR Activation in Pharmaceutical Development: Applying Liver Gene Expression Biomarker Thresholds to Identify Doses Associated With Tumorigenic Risks in Rats.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation is associated with carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic AhR-activating carcinogens such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD), and is often observed with drug candidate molecules in development and raises safety concerns. As downstream effectors of AhR signaling, the expression and activity of Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 genes are commonly monitored as evidence of AhR activation to inform carcinogenic risk of compounds in question. However, many marketed drugs and phytochemicals are reported to induce these Cyps modestly and are not associated with dioxin-like toxicity or carcinogenicity. We hypothesized that a threshold of AhR activation needs to be surpassed in a sustained manner in order for the dioxin-like toxicity to manifest, and a simple liver gene expression signature based on Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 from a short-term rat study could be used to assess AhR activation strength and differentiate tumorigenic dose levels from non-tumorigenic ones. To test this hypothesis, short-term studies were conducted in Wistar Han rats with 2 AhR-activating carcinogens (TCDD and PCB126) at minimally carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic dose levels, and 3 AhR-activating noncarcinogens (omeprazole, mexiletine, and canagliflozin) at the top doses used in their reported 2-year rat carcinogenicity studies. A threshold of AhR activation was identified in rat liver that separated a meaningful "tumorigenic-strength AhR signal" from a statistically significant AhR activation signal that was not associated with dioxin-like carcinogenicity. These studies also confirmed the importance of the sustainability of AhR activation for carcinogenic potential. A sustained activation of AhR above the threshold could thus be used in early pharmaceutical development to identify dose levels of drug candidates expected to exhibit dioxin-like carcinogenic potential.

Cancer risk estimation of glycidol based on rodent carcinogenicity studies, a multiplicative risk model and in vivo dosimetry

Here we evaluate a multiplicative (relative) risk model for improved cancer risk estimation of genotoxic compounds. According to this model, cancer risk is proportional to the background tumor incidence and to the internal dose of the genotoxic compound. Furthermore, the relative risk coefficient per internal dose is considered to be approximately the same across tumor sites, sex, and species.In the present study, we demonstrate that the relative risk model is valid for cancer risk estimation of glycidol, a common food contaminant. Published tumor data from glycidol carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were evaluated in combination with internal dose estimates from hemoglobin adduct measurements in blood from mice and rats treated with glycidol in short-term studies. A good agreement between predicted and observed tumor incidence in responding sites was demonstrated in the animals, supporting a relative risk coefficient that is independent of tumor site, sex, and species. There was no significant difference between the risk coefficients for mice (5.1% per mMh) and rats (5.4% per mMh) when considering internal doses of glycidol. Altogether, this mechanism-based risk model gives a reliable risk coefficient, which then was extrapolated to humans considering internal dose, and background cancer incidence.