Rare Gynecologic Cancers Research Articles

Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration Leading to an Early Diagnosis of Peritoneal Serous Papillary Carcinoma.

A 77-year-old female with a subacute progression of ataxia and serum anti-Yo antibodies was suspected to have paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD). An examination of an underlying cancer showed no abnormality in the gynecological organs, but the findings did show a mass in the Douglas fossa. The mass was resected and diagnosed as stage IIB peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC), a rare gynecologic cancer that is difficult to diagnose in the early stages. PCD was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). For an early diagnosis and treatment, PSPC should be included in the list of malignancies that cause PCD with anti-Yo antibodies.

Clinical trials involving rare gynaecological cancers

Clinical trials that investigate therapies for rare gynaecological cancers (RGC) are essential to provide evidence-based data towards new effective and safe treatments, however, they present unique challenges. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize completed phase III clinical trials investigating therapies for RGC and to discuss the outcomes of these trials. PRISMA guidelines were used to report the steps of the review. We searched the WHO´s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed / Medline for publications reporting results from clinical trials on RGC including at least one medication. From 31 identified phase III clinical trials, 13 were still ongoing, four were terminated and just eight (25.8 %) had posted results and/or publications. The latter completed trials were mostly multi-center and located in at least two continents, participants were mainly adults, and the recruitment period varied from about 2.5 to 10.5 years. Allocation was randomized with parallel assignment in 7 out of 8 trials, while only one trial had double masking. The most common primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), followed by overall survival (OS). Patient-reported outcomes were secondary outcome measures in four completed trials, assessing quality of life by various questionnaires. Most of the trials did not meet their primary endpoints. By highlighting the scarcity of clinical trials on RGC, our findings further emphasize the need for designing, conducting and sustaining phase III clinical trials to investigate innovative therapies for these conditions and report meaningful outcome measures.

Subtle Presentation of Two Rare Gynecological Cancers in a Single Patient: A Case Report

Subtle Presentation of Two Rare Gynecological Cancers in a Single Patient: A Case Report

Current status of in vitro models for rare gynaecological cancer research

Gynaecological cancers originate within the female reproductive system and are classified according to the site in the reproductive system where they arise. However, over 50 % of these malignancies are categorized as rare, encompassing 30 distinct histological subtypes, which complicates their diagnosis and treatment. The focus of this review is to give an overview of established in vitro models for the investigation of rare gynaecological cancers, as well as an overview of available online databases that contain detailed descriptions of cell line characteristics. Cell lines represent the main models for the research of carcinogenesis, drug resistance, pharmacodynamics and novel therapy treatment options. Nowadays, classic 2D cell models are increasingly being replaced with 3D cell models, such as spheroids, organoids, and tumoroids because they provide a more accurate representation of numerous tumour characteristics, and their response to therapy differs from the response of adherent cell lines. It is crucial to use the correct cell line model, as rare tumour types can show characteristics that differ from the most common tumour types and can therefore respond unexpectedly to classic treatment. Additionally, some cell lines have been misclassified or misidentified, which could lead to false results. Even though rare gynaecological cancers are rare, this review will demonstrate that there are available options for investigation of such cancers in vitro on biologically relevant models.

Imaging in Vulval Cancer.

Vulval cancer is a rare gynaecological cancer, accounting for 3% of all gynaecological malignancies, with 47,000 cases in 2022 globally. Various imaging modalities are widely used in conjunction with clinical assessment in the diagnosis and staging of vulval cancers; however, there is significant heterogeneity in which modalities are recommended in international guidelines, reflecting the paucity of evidence in this area. We reviewed the current evidence for the role of imaging in vulval cancer. A systematic search of the literature was performed on the PubMed database using the MeSH terms 'vulval neoplasm' and 'diagnostic imaging'. We found that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of imaging for primary vulval tumours. For nodal assessment, there is no ideal imaging modality with sensitivity or specificity that is superior to other modalities. For distant metastases, CT CAP and FDG-PET/CT have the most evidence to support their use. In conclusion, the evidence for role of imaging in vulval cancer is limited by the heterogeneity of the study design and diagnostic criteria used in each study and the small sample size and retrospective nature of most studies.

My Experience in a Clinical Trial for a Rare Gynecologic Cancer

In this Patient Platform, historian Susan Wade, Ph.D., shares her experience as a participant in an ongoing single-arm phase 2 study of chemoimmunotherapy and radiation for vulvar cancer. She offers her perspective on some of the challenges of having a rare tumor and participating in a clinical trial.

An integrated model for prognosis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundVulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a relatively rare gynecologic cancer. Unlike cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), in which nearly all cases are caused by HPV infection, most VSCCs are HPV-independent. Patients with VSCC also have worse overall survival (OS) than those with CSCC. Unlike CSCC, the risk factors of VSCC have not been extensively studied. Here, we investigated the prognostic values of clinicopathological parameters as well as biomarkers in patients with VSCC.MethodsIn total, 69 cases of VSCC accessions were selected for analysis between April 2010 and October 2020. The risk factors of VSCC were screened using Cox models to establish nomograms for predicting survival outcomes.ResultsFollowing the multivariate COX model for OS, independent predictors including advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] 5.899, p = 0.009), HPV positivity (HR 0.092, p = 0.016), high Ki-67 index (HR 7.899, p = 0.006), PD-L1-positivity (HR 4.736, p = 0.077), and CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (HR 0.214, p = 0.024) were included in the nomogram for OS; multivariate COX model for progression-free survival (PFS) was used to screen prognostic factors including advanced age (HR 2.902, p = 0.058), lymph node metastasis (HR 5.038, p = 0.056), HPV positivity (HR 0.116, p = 0.011), high Ki-67 index (HR 3.680, p = 0.042), PD-L1-positivity (HR 5.311, p = 0.045), and CD8 + TILs (HR 0.236, p = 0.014) to establish the PFS nomogram model. Based on the C-index (0.754 for OS and 0.754 for PFS) from our VSCC cohort and the corrected C-index (0.699 for OS and 0.683 for PFS) from an internal validation cohort, the nomograms demonstrated good predictive and discriminative ability. Kaplan-Meier curves also supported the excellent performance of the nomograms.ConclusionOur prognostic nomograms suggested that (1) shorter OS and PFS were associated with PD-L1-positivity, high Ki-67 index, and low CD8 + TILs; (2) HPV-independent tumors were associated with poorer survival outcome, and mutant p53 status showed no prognostic significance.

Preclinical testing of farletuzumab ecteribulin (FZEC [MORAb-202]) and MORAb-109, folate receptor α and mesothelin targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), in rare gynecologic cancers.

e17634 Background: Rare gynecologic cancers, such as ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS), uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCCA), have limited treatment options and molecular alterations that drive cell proliferation and drug resistance, resulting in poor overall survival. The anti-microtubule agent (AMA) paclitaxel is used in first-line treatment of most gynecologic cancers; however, the AMA eribulin is known to have additional anticancer properties (Goto et al. Anticancer Res 38:2929, 2018; Ho et al. Cancer Res 82:4457, 2022). Eribulin ADCs have been developed for targeted delivery to limit toxicity and maximize response. FZEC is an anti-folate receptor α (FRA)-eribulin ADC (Shimizu et al. Clin Cancer Res 27:3905, 2021) and MORAb-109 targets eribulin to mesothelin (MSLN; Albone et al. Annals Oncol 31:S491, 2020). Here we provide preclinical data to support clinical trials of FZEC and MORAb-109 in rare gynecologic cancers. Methods: Fresh tumor tissue from patients consented to the WEHI Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program was used to establish a cohort of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), OCS, USC and OCCA. PDX models were screened for FRA and MSLN expression by IHC and quantified by HALO software, and 15 models were selected for in vivo testing. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with eribulin (1 mg/kg TIW 3 wks), FZEC (12.5 mg/kg Q14Dx3) or MORAb-109 (25 mg/kg Q14Dx3) and compared to standard of care treatments. Results: About 80% of HGSOC PDX models were FRA positive with no difference between models from chemonaïve samples vs multiple lines of prior treatment. FRA expression was frequent in USC and OCCA models, with MSLN seen in a smaller subset. Despite most (80%) models being cisplatin refractory, 11/15 responded to eribulin with the 4 non-responders having high MDR1 expression and being from previously treated patients. Overall, responses to FZEC and MORAb-109 appeared to correlate with FRA and MSLN expression; importantly, some models with moderate to high target antigen expression showed deeper and more durable responses to FZEC and MORAb-109 compared to eribulin. Conclusions: Responses to FZEC and MORAb-109 correlated with FRA and MSLN expression, with equivalent or better activity compared to eribulin in target-positive PDX models of HGSOC, USC and OCCA. [Table: see text]

Rapid systematic review of clinical trials on pharmacological therapies for rare gynecological cancers

The purpose of this study is to systematically review clinical trials on pharmacological therapies for rare gynecological cancers and analyze their characteristics. The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and two databases were searched (WHO´s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and clinicaltrials.gov). The Jadad score was used to assess the methodological quality of … Continued

Novel Therapies in Gynecologic Cancer.

During the past decade, considerable strides have been made in the understanding and treatment of gynecologic cancers. The advent of PARP inhibitors, antiangiogenic therapies, immunotherapy combinations, and targeted agents have altered the standard of care in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. However, continued advancement in the treatment of gynecologic cancers is critical. Fortunately, exciting work defining new therapeutic targets and novel treatment strategies is on the horizon. Here, we discuss emerging treatments for gynecologic cancers, including endometrial, cervical, ovarian, and rare gynecologic cancers. We highlight research that has deepened our understanding of the unique biology and molecular underpinnings of these cancers and is being translated into powerful new treatment approaches. We particularly highlight the advent of immunotherapy in endometrial cancer; radiosensitizers in cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers; targeted therapies in ovarian cancer; and molecularly driven approaches to treat rare gynecologic cancers. Continued basic, translational, and clinical research holds the promise to change the landscape of gynecologic cancer and improve the lives of all women impacted by these diseases.

Prospective Real-World Gynaecological Cancer Clinical Registry with Associated Biospecimens: A Collaborative Model to Promote Translational Research between GEICO and the Spanish Biobank Network.

Simple SummaryThis is a collaborative approach between two multicentre structures, the Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO) and the Spanish Biobank Network (RNBB), for collecting high-quality clinical data and associated biospecimens from gynaecological patients in the context of a virtual clinical registry (VCR). The model described herein defines the mode of operation of this initiative and represents a win-win example between multicentre structures that will contribute to the success of translational research in gynaecological cancer. As of December 2021, 30 active sites have recruited a total of 655 patients in the GEICO VCR, distributed in the following cohorts: Ovarian Cancer (377), Endometrial Cancer (206), Cervical Cancer (67), and Rare Tumours (5). The main type of associated biospecimens are formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue, plasma, serum, and buffy-coat.Patient registries linked to biorepositories constitute a valuable asset for clinical and translational research in oncology. The Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO), in collaboration with the Spanish Biobank Network (RNBB), has developed a multicentre, multistakeholder, prospective virtual clinical registry (VCR) associated with biobanks for the collection of real-world data and biological samples of gynaecological cancer patients. This collaborative project aims to promote research by providing broad access to high-quality clinical data and biospecimens for future research according to the needs of investigators and to increase diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities for gynaecological cancer patients in Spain. The VCR will include the participation of more than 60 Spanish hospitals entering relevant clinical information in harmonised electronic case report forms (eCRFs) in four different cohorts: ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and rare gynaecological cancers (gestational trophoblastic disease). Initial data for the cases included till December 2021 are presented. The model described herein establishes a real-world win-win collaboration between multicentre structures, promoted and supported by GEICO, that will contribute to the success of translational research in gynaecological cancer.

Combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with rare gynecological malignancies: results of the CA209-538 clinical trial

BackgroundPatients with rare cancers represent 55% of all gynecological malignancies and have poor survival outcomes due to limited treatment options. Combination immunotherapy with the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1)...

The Role of Omics Approaches to Characterize Molecular Mechanisms of Rare Ovarian Cancers: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Rare ovarian cancers are ovarian cancers with an annual incidence of less than 6 cases per 100,000 women. They generally have a poor prognosis due to being delayed diagnosis and treatment. Exploration of molecular mechanisms in these cancers has been challenging due to their rarity and research efforts being fragmented across the world. Omics approaches can provide detailed molecular snapshots of the underlying mechanisms of these cancers. Omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, can identify potential candidate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and screening of rare gynecological cancers and can aid in identifying therapeutic targets. The integration of multiple omics techniques using approaches such as proteogenomics can provide a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Further, omics approaches can provide clues towards developing immunotherapies, cancer recurrence, and drug resistance in tumors; and form a platform for personalized medicine. The current review focuses on the application of omics approaches and integrative biology to gain a better understanding of rare ovarian cancers.

Importance of guidelines and networking for the management of rare gynecological cancers.

Guidelines are essential to support appropriate medical management. The objective of our paper is to highlight the need for such recommendations, to reinforce strategies in place and to promote the creation of multidisciplinary networks to provide the most appropriate care to patients and to improve it. Gynecological rare cancers are not that rare since they represent around 50% of all gynecological cancers. Surgery remains the cornerstone of management for all subtypes. Apart from malignant ovarian germ-cell tumors for which conventional chemotherapy was proven to be efficient, response to standard systemic treatment for other gynecological cancers are disappointing. Better understanding of these pathologies is needed and requires more adapted management. Rare cancers are substantially heterogeneous but raise the need of integrating new cases in dedicated networks to enhance and homogenize medical practices. Centralized diagnosis, improved medical practice based on regularly updated international guidelines, and inclusion in innovative clinical trials linked to preclinical studies are essential to contribute to the promotion of improvement in patient care.

Could MicroRNAs Be Useful Tools to Improve the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare Gynecological Cancers? A Brief Overview.

Gynecological cancers pose an important public health issue, with a high incidence among women of all ages. Gynecological cancers such as malignant germ-cell tumors, sex-cord-stromal tumors, uterine sarcomas and carcinosarcomas, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, vulvar carcinoma and melanoma of the female genital tract, are defined as rare with an annual incidence of <6 per 100,000 women. Rare gynecological cancers (RGCs) are associated with poor prognosis, and given the low incidence of each entity, there is the risk of delayed diagnosis due to clinical inexperience and limited therapeutic options. There has been a growing interest in the field of microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNAs of ∼22 nucleotides in length, because of their potential to regulate diverse biological processes. miRNAs usually induce mRNA degradation and translational repression by interacting with the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target mRNAs, as well as other regions and gene promoters, as well as activating translation or regulating transcription under certain conditions. Recent research has revealed the enormous promise of miRNAs for improving the diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of all major gynecological cancers. However, to date, only a few studies have been performed on RGCs. In this review, we summarize the data currently available regarding RGCs.

A review of prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Evidence from the last decade.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

Feasibility of a platform trial in rare gynecologic cancers based on molecular analysis

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether enough actionable mutations exist in rare gynecologic cancers to justify the design of a platform trial.

Avelumab Shows Potential to Cure Rare Gynecologic Cancer Resistant to Chemo

Avelumab Shows Potential to Cure Rare Gynecologic Cancer Resistant to Chemo

Abstract IA25: Personalizing treatment for women with rare epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC): Lessons learned

Abstract Prior to the mid-2000s, all epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes were treated identically worldwide. In 2005, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) established the Rare Tumor Committee. Over the past almost 15 years, GOG (subsequently merged into NRG Oncology) has been a leader in the development of clinical trials for rare gynecologic tumors, and a number of lessons have been learned. Initially the Rare Tumor Committee was faced with the challenge of determining on which rare gynecologic cancers it should focus. Lesson 1: There is no universal definition of a rare cancer. Ultimately, the group decided to concentrate on trials of rare EOC. Prior to this point, there were essentially no prospective data on these histotypes. Lesson 2: The study of rare EOC was energized by a number of converging factors. Refinement of histopathologic criteria, advances in the molecular biology, and publication of hypothesis-generating observational studies all played a major role in moving the field forward. Lesson 3: Significant challenges and barriers to conducting clinical trials of rare cancers exist and need to be fully understood. These include small numbers of cases, long accrual times, few interested investigators, less attention by the scientific community, low funding priority, low priority by pharma, fewer patient advocates, and lack of standard bioinformatics methods and trial designs. Lesson 4: In designing rare EOC clinical trials, one must balance scientific value with feasibility. Over time and with trial and error, it became obvious that accrual to clinical trials for recurrent clear-cell and low-grade serous ovarian cancers was completely feasible, but the unexpected extreme rarity of mucinous ovarian cancer led to a failed international trial. Lesson 5: Trials for rare EOC in the front-line or salvage setting may have different implications for feasibility. Front-line trials for clear-cell ovarian cancer, both randomized and nonrandomized, have been feasible. Front-line randomized trials for mucinous ovarian cancers do not appear to be feasible. A new clinical trial for front-line treatment of low-grade serous ovarian cancer has recently been activated; feasibility is as yet unknown. Lesson 6: Accurate pathologic diagnosis is essential to quality rare EOC clinical trials. In some instances, prospective digital pathology review was used as an eligibility criterion to optimize efficiency. Lesson 7: Characterization of the molecular signatures of rare EOC and availability of targeted agents significantly facilitated the development of innovative clinical trials. We now have excellent information regarding the common molecular aberrations in clear-cell carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma. Lesson 8: Strategies for clinical trial design for rare EOC should include consideration of certain principles. These principles include determination of feasibility of phase II versus randomized phase II versus phase III designs; clinical trials that seek large benefits in selected populations with small sample size; tolerating a higher degree of uncertainty; relaxation of type I and type II errors; adaptive and Bayesian trial designs; rigorous use of early stopping rules; use of surrogate endpoints (response, PFS, or DFS, etc.); full exploitation of modern imaging techniques; strong translational research endpoints; and, in absence of known effective standard treatment, use of randomized phase II design to compare two or more experimental treatments. Finally, Lesson 9: Organizational aspects may be critical in the conduct of rare EOC trials. Key ingredients for successful conduct of rare tumor trials may include national or international networks involving centers of excellence; use of cancer registries to identify, screen, and recruit patients; utilization of retrospective or observational studies for hypothesis-generating data; quality tumor repositories; understanding differences in regulatory and funding issues across the world; and regular consultations between regulatory bodies, pharmaceutical companies, patient advocates, and investigators. All of these lessons will hopefully assist future investigators in the development of clinical trials for rare EOC. Citation Format: David M. Gershenson. Personalizing treatment for women with rare epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC): Lessons learned [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr IA25.

Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with rare gynaecological malignancies.

6091 Background: Up to 50% of gynecological cancers are considered rare. The outcome of these patients (pts) is poor given a lack of scientific and clinical knowledge. Immunotherapy using single agent anti- PD-1/PD-L1 treatment (tx) has shown only modest activity in patients with common gynecological malignancies, such as high grade serous ovarian cancer (ca) and microsatellite stable endometrial ca. Combined CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade using ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to single agent anti-PD-1 therapy in pts with advanced melanoma and renal cell ca. To date, no trials have been undertaken with ipi/nivo in patients with rare gynecological malignancies. Methods: 41 pts with advanced rare gynecological malignancies were enrolled into the CA209-538 trial. Pts received nivo 3mg/kg and ipi 1mg/kg q 3 weekly for four doses, followed by nivo 3mg/kg q 2 weekly. Tx continued for up to 96 weeks, or until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity. Response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR +PR + SD). Exploratory endpoints include correlation of efficacy with biomarkers (incl PD-L1/TMB). Results: Pts with 10 rare tumor types were enrolled (Table). 39/41 pts have received prior therapy (1-7 lines). Objective responses were observed in 11 pts (27%) including pts with vaginal SCC, ovarian clear cell and low grade serous ca, ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell, uterine serous ca and leiomyosarcoma. A further 9 pts had SD as their best radiological response resulting in a CBR of 49%. The median duration of response had not been reached (range 3.5 – 25+ months) with seven responses being ongoing. 63% of pts experienced an immune related adverse event (irAEs) with 4 pts developing Grade 3/4 irAEs. Conclusions: Ipi/Nivo tx demonstrates efficacy in a range of different rare gynecological cancers with a significant number of durable responses being observed. Tumor agnostic biomarkers are required to assist with better patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT02923934. [Table: see text]