RapidArc Technique Research Articles

HYBRID PLANNING A SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION (CSI)

Purpose: A simple planning technique for craniospinal irradiation using Eclipse treatment planning system. Material and methods: In RT treatment planning, base plan optimization feature is used in sequential RT planning by anticipating the dose delivered to organ at risk (OAR) & planning target volume (PTV) in the base plan. In hybrid planning technique, the whole PTV is divided into two parts, Brain PTV & Spine PTV. Spine PTV is overlapped minimum 2-3 cm over the Brain PTV at their junction while creating structures for RT planning. Brain PTV is planned with conventional RT technique & the Spine PTV planned with rapid arc technique (VMAT). In the plan optimization process of spine PTV, first base plan is selected then the optimization parameter is set accordingly as per total prescribed dose of 36 Gy for both the PTVs. The base plan is the dose calculated plan which is incorporated in the rapid arc plan optimization hence the pre-existed doses of Brain PTV & OAR help to understand the plannerfor achieving desired planning objectives during Spine PTV, RT plan optimization. Finally for the dose calculation of Spine PTV RT plan, planner has to copy fields of Brain PTV & paste it in Spine PTV plan and need to calculate dose for these copied fields. The final plan contains a dose calculated of Brain PTV fields and Spine PTV fields termed as hybrid plan. Result: Reduction in the total number of monitor units is observed for the hybrid plan compared to single VMAT plan, which is statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Present study introduced the hybrid planning technique which can exploit benefits of conventional and modern techniques.

Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study).

SRS and SRT are precise treatments for brain metastases, delivering high doses while minimizing doses to nearby organs. Modern linear accelerators enable the precise delivery of SRS/SRT using different modalities like three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and Rapid Arc (RA). This study aims to compare dosimetric differences and evaluate the effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc techniques in SRS/SRT for brain metastases. 10 patients with brain metastases, 3 patients assigned for SRT, and 7 patients for SRS. For each patient, 3 treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system using different treatment modalities. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three techniques in the homogeneity index (HI), maximum D2%, and minimum D98% doses for the target, with a p > 0.05. The RA demonstrated a better conformity index of 1.14±0.25 than both IMRT 1.21±0.26 and 3DCRT 1.37±0.31. 3DCRT and IMRT had lower Gradient Index values compared to RA, suggesting that they achieved a better dose gradient than RA. The mean treatment time decreased by 26.2% and 10.3% for 3DCRT and RA, respectively, compared to IMRT. In organs at risk, 3DCRT had lower maximum doses than IMRT and RA, but some differences were not statistically significant. However, in the brain stem and brain tissues, RA exhibited lower maximum doses compared to IMRT and 3DCRT. Additionally, RA and IMRT had lower V15Gy, V12Gy, and V9Gy values compared to 3DCRT. While 3D-CRT delivered lower doses to organs at risk, RA and IMRT provided better conformity and target coverage. RA effectively controlled the maximum dose and irradiated volume of normal brain tissue. Overall, these findings indicate that 3DCRT, RA, and IMRT are suitable for treating brain metastases in SRS/SRT due to their improved dose conformity and target coverage while minimizing dose to healthy tissues.

A dosimetric study comparing Cyberknife and LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery treatments

BackgroundWhile Gamma Knife and CyberKnife are commonly used for Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), their availability is limited. In contrast, linac-based SRS using linear accelerators (linacs) is more accessible and widely used. PurposeOur study aims to evaluate Linac-based SRS with the Varian RapidArc technique for treating brain metastases. The primary objective is to compare the quality of treatment plans between RapidArc and CyberKnife modalities. Materials & methodsTen patients with a single brain metastasis were treated using the CyberKnife machine with prescribed doses ranging from 18 to 25 Gy. Treatment plans utilized Multiplan software for CyberKnife and Eclipse for RapidArc plans. The plans were evaluated based on dose metrics for the target and critical structures, treatment time, and brain tissue volume. ResultsBoth techniques provided acceptable Gross tumor volume coverage and organs at risk sparing. CyberKnife delivered a higher integral dose to the Gross tumor volume and brain tissues compared to RapidArc (p < 0.05). The conformity index was slightly better in RapidArc (1.14 ± 0.25) compared to CyberKnife (1.22 ± 0.12), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, CyberKnife exhibited a better dose gradient index (4.52 ± 0.99) compared to RapidArc (8.6 ± 7.28). The treatment time in RapidArc was significantly lower compared to CyberKnife, p < 0.05. RapidArc demonstrated lower minimum and maximum doses to some organs at risk, although some differences were not statistically significant. For normal brain tissues, V12Gy was significantly lower with RapidArc (3.27 ± 2.92) compared to CyberKnife (4.09 cc ± 3.27). ConclusionThe RapidArc technique is capable of achieving similar treatment quality as CyberKnife systems for SRS treatments. It offers improved target coverage, higher conformity, and homogeneous dose distribution within the Planning target volume if homogeneity is desirable in some intuitions or cases. In addition, it can also achieve low integral doses to organs at risk and brain tissues.

Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc in hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost

The HyperArc technique is known for generating high-quality radiosurgical treatment plans for intracranial lesions or hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, there is no reported feasibility of using the HyperArc technique in hippocampal-sparing WBRT with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). This study aimed to compare dosimetric parameters of 2 commercially-available volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy techniques, HyperArc and RapidArc, when using hippocampal-sparing WBRT with a SIB to treat brain metastases.Treatment plans using HyperArc and RapidArc techniques were generated retrospectively for 19 previously treated patients (1 to 3 brain metastases). The planning target volumes for the whole brain (excluding the hippocampal avoidance region; PTVWB) and metastases (PTVmet) were prescribed 25 and 45 Gy, respectively, in 10 fractions. Each plan included homogeneous and inhomogeneous delivery to the PTVmet. Dosimetric parameters for the target (conformity index [CI], homogeneity index [HI], target coverage [D95%]), and nontarget organs at risk were compared for the HyperArc and RapidArc plans.For homogeneous delivery, dosimetric parameters, including mean CI, HI, and target coverage in PTVWB and PTVmet, were superior for HyperArc than RapidArc plans (all p < 0.01). The PTVWB and PTVmet target coverage for HyperArc plans was significantly greater than for RapidArc plans (96.17% vs 93.38%, p < 0.01; 94.02% vs 92.21%, p < 0.01, respectively). HyperArc plans had significantly lower mean hippocampal Dmax and Dmin values than RapidArc plans (Dmax: 15.53 Gy vs, 16.71 Gy, p < 0.01; Dmin: 8.33 Gy vs 8.93 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively). Similarly, inhomogeneous delivery of hyperArc produced a superior target and lower hippocampal dosimetric parameters than RapidArc, except for the HI of PTVmet (all p < 0.01).HyperArc generated superior conformity and target coverage with lower hippocampal doses than RapidArc. HyperArc could be an attractive technique for hippocampal-sparing WBRT with an SIB.

A plan comparison study between rapid arc and conventional intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Head and neck cancers are one of the common malignancies in Indian population. It's entity, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is among the aggressive malignancies with its location and spread near very critical structures. Thus requires a highly conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques. The aim of the study is to dosimetrically evaluate and to compare Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans and RAPID ARC plans for irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A retrospective study is done on 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, who were treated with Radiotherapy at ATRCTRI Bikaner. Radiotherapy was delivered by IMRT technique (Total of 70 Gy in 33 fractions). Same patients are now planned on Rapid arc technique. Dosimetric comparison is done in terms of PTV coverage, OAR dose, conformity index, homogeneity index. PTV coverage is similar with both the plans. Homogeneity index is higher for IMRT plans 0.119+/- 0.020 compared to 0.104 +/- 0.018 for Rapid arc plans (statistically significant).The Rapid arc plans achieved slightly better conformity 1.018+/-0.09, whereas 1.105+/-0.12 for IMRT plans. Rapid arc achieved better results for OAR, statistically significant for Brainstem (54.4 +/-10.4 Gy for IMRT and 49.7+/-4.2 Gy for Rapid Arc, Lens (Left lens and Right lens received 10.55+/-5.8 Gy and 9.44+/-9.08 by IMRT and 6.12+/-6.1 Gy and 5.45+/-6.05 Gy for Rapid Arc), optic nerves (Right and Left optic nerve received 34.36 and 35.01 Gy for IMRT plans and 30.06 and 30.05 Gy for Rapid Arc plans. However the gains are statistically insignificant for spinal cord and vestibulocochlear nerve. No major difference found for Right and left parotid between both the arms. Rapid Arc is better technique compared to IMRT for Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment, that provides better dose conformity, more homogeneous coverage and OAR sparing. However study is retrospective and has lesser patients, thus requires prospective study with more number of patients along with comparison of clinical outcome.

Application of a Comprehensive Treatment Planning Test for Credentialing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and RapidArc in a TrueBeam Linear Accelerator Setup.

An extended version of task group report (TG)-119 dosimetric tests was introduced and tested on the TrueBeam linear accelerator setup. Treatment plan results and quality assurance (QA) results of RapidArc (RA) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were compared to understand the limitation and efficacy of the RA and IMRT system of the linear accelerator. Test structure sets were drawn on OCTAVIUS four-dimensional (4D) phantom computed tomography scan data for this study. We generated treatment plans based on the specified goal in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system using RA and IMRT in the study phantom. We used the same planning objectives for RA and IMRT techniques. Planar dose verification was performed using electronic portal imaging device and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom. The treatment log file was further analyzed using Pylinac (V2.4.0 (Open Source Code library available on Github, runs under Python programming language)) to compare the dosimetric outcome of RA and IMRT. Dose to the planning target volume (PTV) 1-5 and organ at risk (OAR) were analyzed in this study for the efficiency comparison of RA and IMRT. The primary objective was accomplished by adhering to the dose constraints associated with PTV 2 and the OAR. RA and IMRT also met the secondary objective. The tertiary goal of dose delivery to PTV 4 was met with RA but not IMRT. This study can be utilized to compare different institutions' planning and patient-specific QA (PSQA) procedures. The findings of this study were in line with the published works of the literature. A multi-institutional planning and delivery accuracy audit can be built using this structure and set of planning objectives having similar PSQA phantom. The TG-119 report incorporated test challenges that were combined in a single study set and a single plan. This reduces the complexity of performing the original TG-119 tests, whereas keeping the challenges as introduced in the TG-119 report. This study's planning and dosimetric results could be further utilized for dosimetry audit with any institute having a linear accelerator and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom for PSQA.

Analysis of Rapid arc-based Radiation Therapy on Dosimetric Parameters in Cervical Cancer Patients with and without Bone Marrow Sparing.

The standard treatment for cervical cancer is chemoradiation therapy. Pelvic radiation is associated with higher dose to bone marrow (BM) causing interrupted treatment due to haematologic toxicity with inferior outcomes. This study aims to evaluate rapid arc technique in sparing pelvic BM and dosimetric parameters for pelvis V5GY, V10GY, V20GY, V30GY, and V40GY dose. Twenty one cervical cancer patients were selected for the analysis. Planning target volume (PTV) contours, total pelvic BM and surrounding structures contours were standardised. Two rapid arc based procedures were designed for individual patient. One was done using bone marrow sparing (BMS) constraints while other was performed without BMS constraints. Data for both plans was calculated with regard to PTV, normal structures and pelvic BM. Difference in dose distribution in both groups was analysed using Wilcoxon and Friedman ANOVA test. In the presence of BM constraint a significant changes in pelvic BM dose for values of V10GY (p=0.002), V20GY (p=0.002) and V40GY (p=0.025) was observed. The coverage of PTV was found to be unaffected by adding BM constraint. The BM is radiosensitive structure so dosage is linked with haemtological toxicity. Increased dose is associated with higher grade of haematological toxicity in pelvic radiotherapy. The study suggests that adding BM constraint in plans reduced the pelvic BM dose while not affecting PTV coverage and dose to bowel, bladder and rectum. Bone marrow constraint in pelvic radiotherapy can be considered for better treatment toleration and to determine its role in decreasing haematological toxicity.

Independent Dose Calculation when External Radiotherapy Cancer Patient Planning

Purpose: Independent dose calculation (IDC) and quantitative processing of the calculating the 3D&#x0D; CRT, IMRT, RapidArc results of patients irradiation plans was conducted. Criteria for passing the exposure plans for the implementation of radiation therapy was developed.&#x0D; Materials and methods: An independent manual dose calculation of patient exposure plans was performed using 3D CRT, IMRT and RapidArc techniques. Discrepancies were obtained for three groups of&#x0D; patients: 3D CRT group contained 1584 patients, the group of patients who received IMRT included&#x0D; 647 patients. The patient group, in which rotary mode RapidArc was performed, included 364 patients.&#x0D; Results: As the analysis result of the IDC for 3D CRT, IMRT, RapidArc technologies, the quantitative indicators were ranked. The allowable discrepancies between the dose IDC and the dose calculated by the&#x0D; TPS were proposed for consideration: for 3D CRT technology from –5 to +10 %, for IMRT from 1.5 to 6&#x0D; times, for RapidArc from 1, 5 to 2.5 times. Outside the specified intervals, it is necessary to check and&#x0D; reschedule plans or conduct verification.

Dosimetric Influence of Acuros XB Dose-to-Medium and Dose-to-Water Reporting Modes on Carcinoma Cervix Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric RapidArc Technique.

Aim:We aimed to evaluate the dosimetric influence of Acuros XB (AXB) dose-to-medium (Dm) and dose-to-water (Dw) reporting mode on carcinoma cervix using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and RapidArc (RA) technique.Materials and Methods:A cohort of thirty patients cared for carcinoma cervix was retrospectively selected for the study. Plans were computed using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA), AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw algorithms for dosimetric comparison. A paired t-test and Pitman–Morgan dispersion test were executed to appraise the difference in mean values and the inter-patient variability of the differences.Results:The dose–volume parameters were higher for AXB-Dw in contrast to AAA for IMRT and RA plans, excluding D98%, minimum dose to planning target volume (PTV) and rectum mean dose (RA). There was no systematic trend observed in dose–volume parameters for PTV and organs at risk (OARs) between AXB-Dm and AXB-Dw for IMRT and RA plans. The dose–volume parameters for target were higher for AXB-Dm in comparison to AAA in IMRT and RA plans, except D98% and minimum dose to PTV. Analysis envisaged less inter-patient variability while switching from AAA to AXB-Dm in comparison to those switching from AAA to AXB-Dw.Conclusions:The present study reveals the important difference between AAA, AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw computations for cervix carcinoma using IMRT and RA techniques. The inter-patient variability and systematic difference in dose–volume parameters computed using AAA, AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw algorithms present the possible impact on the dose prescription to PTV and their relative constraints to OARs for IMRT and RA techniques. This may help in the decision-making in clinic while switching from AAA to AXB (Dm or Dw) algorithm for cervix carcinoma using IMRT and RA techniques.

Dosimetric study of Rapid Arc therapy during Craniospinal Irradiation in Adult patients

Context: Adult medulloblastomas are very rare and constitute only 1% of the central nervous system tumors in adults. CSI treatment is challenging in adults due to the long, irregular target volume, critical structures, and field matchings due to multiple fields. Aims: This retrospective dosimetric study of adult patients who underwent Craniospinal irradiation was done to get insight into the challenges in the treatment and advantages of using RapidArc technique. Materials and Methods: The computed dosimetric rapid arc planning data of 3 adult cases who underwent Craniospinal irradiation between November 2018 and June 2021 were studied. Results: In our study mean conformity index (range) was 0.95 (0.91–1) and Mean homogeneity index (range) was 0.11 (0.06–0.15). Mean dose to the lenses, lungs, heart, and kidneys was 6.4 Gy, 9.4 Gy, 5 Gy, and 7 Gy, respectively. Conclusions: Volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for Craniospinal irradiation gives conformal dose distribution within the target, better normal tissue sparing, and more homogeneous dose distribution in the field junctions without the need to move the junction.

Evaluation of Dose Distribution Indices by using RapidArc Technique for the Treatment of Gynecological Cancer

Introduction: This study describes the distribution of radiation doses to investigate the planned target volume (PTV) of gynecological cancers using the RapidArc technique. The optimal treatment plan options are developed by involvement of different dosimetric parameters including Homogeneity index (HI), Conformity index (HI), Uniformity index (UI), Radical dose homogeneity index (rDHI) and Moderate dose homogeneity index (mDHI).&#x0D; Method: Thirteen patients diagnosed with gynecological cancer were treated through RapidArc on DHX Varian linear accelerator with 6MV and 15MV photon beams. This therapy was carried out with linac.&#x0D; Result: The calculated dosimetric parameters for planning target volume were found in the ranges; HI (1.08 to 1.20), CI (0.985 to 0.997 in RTOG), CI (1.003 to 1.005 in ICRU), UI (1.05 to 1.13), rDHI (0.57 to 0.75) and mDHI (0.88 to 0.93).&#x0D; Conclusion: It has been concluded that all the calculated indices are within the range specified by radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG; 1993), International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) and OLIVER; except in rare cases may be due to complex geometry, tumor volume range, and low radiation dose.This treatment can be further added to calculate other dose indices by using higher energy beams and different prescription doses for different fractions.

Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB on cervix radiotherapy using RapidArc technique: a dosimetric study.

Acuros XB (AXB) may predict better rectal toxicities and treatment outcomes in cervix carcinoma. The aim of the study was to quantify the potential impact of AXB computations on the cervix radiotherapy using the RapidArc (RA ) technique as compared to anisotropic analytical algorithm (AA) computations. A cohort of 30 patients previously cared for cervix carcinoma (stages II-IIIB) was selected for the present analysis. The RA plans were computed using AA and AXB dose computation engines under identical beam setup and MLC pattern. There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in D95% and D98% to the planning target volume (PTV); moreover, a significant (p < 0.05) rise was noticed for mean dose to the PTV (0.26%), D50% (0.26%), D2% (0.80%) and V110% (44.24%) for AXB computation as compared to AA computations. Further, AXB estimated a significantly (p < 0.05) lower value for maximum and minimum dose to the PTV. Additionally, there was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction observed in mean dose to organs at risk (OARs) for AXB computation as compared to AA, though the reduction in mean dose was non-significant (p > 0.05) for the rectum. The maximum difference observed was 4.78% for the rectum V50Gy, 1.72%, 1.15% in mean dose and 2.22%, 1.48% in D2% of the left femur and right femur, respectively, between AA and AXB dose estimations. For similar target coverage, there were significant differences observed between the AAA and AXB computations. AA underestimates the V50Gy of the rectum and overestimates the mean dose and D2% for femoral heads as compared to AXB. Therefore, the use of AXB in the case of cervix carcinoma may predict better rectal toxicities and treatment outcomes in cervix carcinoma using the RA technique.

IMAT-IGRT Treatment with Simultaneous Integrated Boost as Dose Escalation for Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Single Institution, Prospective Pilot Study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to introduce the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to assess the safety of replacement of the brachytherapy (BT) boost for ineligible patients with cervical cancer receiving radiochemotherapy (RCT). Methods: Fourteen patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2018. SIB was delivered using RapidArc technique at doses of 2.4 Gy per fraction during pelvic irradiation with 50.4/1.8 Gy in seven patients (to a total dose of 67.2 Gy) with limited volume disease. In 7 patients with a more advanced disease stage (>5 cm tumor, parametric invasion both sides), parametric boost therapy was added to the pelvic radiotherapy to a total dose of the macroscopic tumor of 79.2 Gy. All patients received simultaneous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for 5 cycles with a dosage of 40 mg/m2. We examined acute toxicity (CTCAE v4.1) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ30 and CX24). The tumor regression rate was evaluated with RECIST 1.1 after the first 3- to 4-months follow-up Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan. We calculated the percentage of tumor regression rate and the local control during the follow-up period and evaluated the survival data. Results: Our patient data are presented at a median follow-up time of 24.5 months. During the treatment period, no grade 3 to 4 toxicity was observed. During the follow-up period, no late-onset toxicity was observed. The tumor regression rate at the first MRI scan was 95.31% on average. Disease free survival (DFS) during the median follow-up of 24 months was 98.6%. Conclusion: In patients with cervical cancer, the SIB technique is amenable as part of definitive RCT. Dose escalation with the SIB technique can be safely administered to cervical cancer patients during definitive RCT if BT is not feasible. However, further randomized clinical studies are needed to validate the method, so routine use of it cannot be recommended yet.

A Dosimetric Study of Volumetric Arc Modulation with RapidArc Versus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy inCervical Cancer Patients

Introduction: The method of radiotherapy has moved away from two-dimensional and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy towards Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for advanced carcinomas. VMAT treatments often result in significant clinical advantage, particularly when concave dose distributions are required as is often the situation since these tumours are in close proximity to several critical structures. Aim:To investigate the potential clinical role of volumetric arc therapy on cervical cancer patients and its comparison with fixed-field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) was used as a benchmark. Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, radiotherapy treatment plans of fifteen cervical cancer patients were selected for this study. These patients were previously treated with sliding window IMRT techniques during January 2020 to November 2020. For dosimetric comparison of sliding window IMRT techniques with RapidArc, a new set of plans were created using VMAT/RapidArc technique. For each patient two plans were generated and in this way total 30 plans were analysed. The prescription dose to Planning Target Volume (PTV) was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (1.8Gy/fraction) for the 6 MV photon beam. Comparison of each plan done on the basis of Organs At Risk (OARs) sparing, coverage index (C), Conformity Index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), dose Gradient Index (GI), and Unified Dosimetry Index (UDI). This study utilised UDI scoring for evaluation and comparison of RapidArc and IMRT plans. Treatment Time (TT) for patient comfort and the number of Monitor Units (MUs) for long-term side-effects was also taken into consideration. A paired two-tailed t-test was executed for the dosimetric study of volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and its comparison with the IMRT technique in the radiotherapy treatment of cervical cancer patients. All the collected data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. The (p-value&lt;0.05) was contemplated for the level of statistical significance. Results: Comparable target coverage and better sparing of OARs were achieved with the RapidArc technique in comparison to IMRT. As was evident with results of present study, the values of CI (1.55±0.07), HI (1.07±0.07), GI (0.98±0.01) and UDI (1.25±0.11) of RapidArc technique showed significant difference from respective values of IMRT Technique (1.67±0.06, 1.10±0.06, 0.96±0.01 and 1.38±0.13). Values of MUs (1560.47±52.16) and treatment time (3.71±0.73 mins) were significantlly high in IMRT technique as compared to RapidArc technique (542.33±51.09 and 2.39±0.35 mins respectively). Conclusion: From this study, it is clear that a similar planning goal can be achieved by RapidArc in comparison to fixed-field IMRT with less normal organ toxicity. RapidArc is a faster and precise treatment technique. The most significant change comes to see in the number of MUs and TT, which is much lesser in RapidArc.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Dosimetric and Treatment Planning Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques

Introduction: Traditional Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques used many beam angles; the result of this is significant increase in beam on time as well as Monitor Units (MU) also. Due to all of these there is a need of faster treatment modality to increase the patient comfort and lesser organ movement. Aim: To compare the triple arc RapidArc technique with nine field IMRT techniques for different head and neck cancer, focusing on target coverage and dose received by the Organs At Risk (OARs). Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of 20 patients of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Oro-pharynx and Hypo-pharynx treated during January 2019 to December 2019 were chosen for this study. For every patient, two different treatment plans were created, one by using the triple arc RapidArc technique and others by using nine fixed fields IMRT technique. For Planning Target Volume (PTV), the dose volume parameters D98% and D2% (dose received by the 98%, and 2% of the volume), homogeneity index, and Conformity Index (CI) were evaluated for dosimetric comparison. For OARs, the analysis included the mean dose, the maximum dose expressed as D2%. Additionally, the Beam On Time (BOT) and the number of MUs were analysed. A paired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the RapidArc technique with the IMRT technique for radiotherapy treatment of different head and neck cancers. The p-value &lt;0.05 was considered for the significance of statistical inferences. Results: Comparable target coverage and better sparing of OARs were achieved with the RapidArc technique in comparison to IMRT. Homogeneity and conformity were also in favour of the RapidArc plan. The dosimetric results with I’MatriXX measurements of RapidArc plans were similar to IMRT plans. All detector points passed 3 mm and 3% gamma criteria for IMRT plans and also for RapidArc plans. Conclusion: RapidArc is a faster and precise treatment technique. RapidArc provides better target coverage with good OARs sparing. Most significant change occurs in the number of MUs and treatment time, which is much lesser in RapidArc.

DIPG-23. SINGLE CASE REPORT OF LOW DOSE RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF DIPG

A 3 year-old girl, was noted to have progressive gait problem since Nov. 2017 and brought to hospital for checkup. Brain MRI on Jan. 2018 showed T2 hyperintensity infiltrative pontine lesion, favoring diffuse infiltrative pontine glioma and mild obstructive hydrocephalus, received VP-shunting on Jan. 15, 2018. Due to the refusal of surgical biopsy for tissue proof, we started the radiotherapy from Jan. 24, 2018, using Rapidarc technique with 6MV photon energy to treat the brain stem lesion, ended on Feb. 24, 2018 with total dose of 25.5Gy in 17 fractions as our usual practice. Following the completion of radiotherapy, we started the adjuvant chemotherapy using 1-week on, 1-week off regimen of temozolomide using dosage of 75 mg/sq-m/day, and this patient’s general condition returned back to nearly normal. Serial follow-up images of brain MRI on 04/30/2018, 08/01/2018, 11/30/2018, 02/26/2019, 05/30/2019, 08/28/2019 showed slow progression of the pontine lesion, without the development of contrast enhanced new lesion. She maintained the functional independent until Sep. 2019, she was noted to have symptoms of ataxic gait, esotropia and choking on drinking liquid. We started the retreatment of radiotherapy from Oct.7, 2019, using same technique, ended on Nov. 5, 2019 with total dose of 30Gy in 20 fractions. The symptoms improved partially after the treatment, with residual weakness over left extremity. We are still treating the patient with adjuvant temozolomide, and she has survived most of time functionally independent in these 2 years.

Assessment of the results and hematological side effects of 3D conformal and IMRT/ARC therapies delivered during craniospinal irradiation of childhood tumors with a follow-up period of five years

BackgroundCraniospinal irradiation (CSI) of childhood tumors with the RapidArc technique is a new method of treatment. Our objective was to compare the acute hematological toxicity pattern during 3D conformal radiotherapy with the application of the novel technique.MethodsData from patients treated between 2007 and 2014 were collected, and seven patients were identified in both treatment groups. After establishing a general linear model, acute blood toxicity results were obtained using SPSS software. Furthermore, the exposure dose of the organs at risk was compared. Patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years, and progression-free survival and overall survival data were assessed.ResultsAfter assessment of the laboratory parameters in the two groups, it may be concluded that no significant differences were detected in terms of the mean dose exposures of the normal tissues or the acute hematological side effects during the IMRT/ARC and 3D conformal treatments. Laboratory parameters decreased significantly compared to the baseline values during the treatment weeks. Nevertheless, no significant differences were detected between the two groups. No remarkable differences were confirmed between the two groups regarding the five-year progression-free survival or overall survival, and no signs of serious organ toxicity due to irradiation were observed during the follow-up period in either of the groups.ConclusionThe RapidArc technique can be used safely even in the treatment of childhood tumors, as the extent of the exposure dose in normal tissues and the amount of acute hematological side effects are not higher with this technique.

Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundTo evaluate dosimetric differences of salvage irradiations using two commercially available volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques: RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA), for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after initial radiation therapy.MethodsTen patients with recurrent NPC status previously treated with radiation therapy were considered suitable candidates for salvage SBRT using VMAT approach. Two separate treatment plans were created with HA and RA techniques for each case, with dosimetric outcomes compared with respect to tumor target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Furthermore, the cumulative radiobiological effects to the relevant OARs from the original radiotherapy to the respective salvage SBRT plans were analyzed in terms of biologically effective dose (BED).ResultsTreatment with HA exhibited similar target dose coverage as with RA, while delivering a higher mean dose to the targets. Using RA technique, the mean maximal doses to optic apparatus and the mean brain dose were reduced by 1 to 1.5 Gy, comparing to HA technique. The conformity index, gradient radius, and intermediate dose spillage in HA plans were significantly better than those in RA. With HA technique, the volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more was reduced by 44%, comparing to RA technique. The cumulative BEDs to spinal cord and optic apparatus with RA technique were 1 to 2 Gy3 less than those with HA. HA technique significantly reduced the volume within body that received more than 100 Gy.ConclusionsWith better dose distribution than RA while maintaining sufficient target dose coverage, HA represents an attractive salvage SBRT technique for recurrent NPC.

Clinical implication in the use of the AAA algorithm versus the AXB in nasopharyngeal carcinomas by comparison of TCP and NTCP values

PurposeRetrospective analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans to investigate qualitative, possible, clinical consequences of the use of AAA versus AXB in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) cases.MethodsThe dose distribution of 26 treatment plans, produced using RapidArc technique and AAA algorithm, were recalculated using AXB and the same number of monitor units provided by AAA and clinically delivered to each patient. The potential clinical effect of dosimetric differences in the planning target volume (PTV) and in organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated by comparing TCP and NTCP values. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for statistical comparison of all results obtained from the use of the two algorithms.ResultsThe poorer coverage of the PTV, with higher prescribed dose, was reflected in the TCP, which was significantly lower when AXB was used, the median value was 81.55% (range: 74.90, 88.60%) and 84.10% (range: 77.70, 89.90%) for AAA (p < 0.001). OAR mean dose was lower in the AXB recalculated plan than the AAA plan and the difference was statistically significant for all the structures. The NTCP for developing mandible necrosis showed the largest median percentage difference between AAA and AXB (56.6%), the NTCP of risk for larynx edema of Grade ≥ 2 followed with 12.2%.ConclusionsDifferences in dose distribution of NPC treatment plans recalculated with AXB are of clinical significance in those situations where the PTV and OAR involve air or bone, media in which AXB has been shown to more accurately represent the true dose distribution. The availability of AXB algorithm could improve patient dose estimation, increasing the data consistency of clinical trials.

Dosimetric comparison of integral dose for different techniques of craniospinal irradiation

AbstractAim:Comparison of the integral dose (ID) delivered to organs at risk (OAR), non-target body and target body by using different techniques of craniospinal irradiation (CSI).Materials and methods:Ten CSI patients (medulloblastoma) already planned and treated either with linear accelerator three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (Linac-3DCRT) technique or with linear accelerator RapidArc (Linac-RapidArc) technique by Novalis-Tx Linac machine have been analysed. Retrospectively, these patients are again planned on Radixact-X9 Linac with Helical, Direct-3DCRT and Direct-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (Direct-IMRT) techniques. The dose prescription to planning target volume brain (PTV-Brain) and PTV-Spine is 36 Gy in 20 fractions and is kept the same for all techniques. The target body, non-target body, OARs and total body dose are compared.Results:ID is lowest in the RapidArc plan for every patient in comparison to Helical and Direct-IMRT. The ID for Body-PTV was found slightly higher in the RapidArc plan in comparison to 3DCRT plans. But there is better normal tissue sparing for most of the OARs in RapidArc plans if it compares with 3DCRT plans.Findings:RapidArc is a better alternative for the treatment of CSI. It provides better target coverage and better OARs sparing from any other treatment techniques.