Rapid Diagnosis Of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Research Articles

Rapid Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis-Opportunities and Challenges.

Global tuberculosis (TB) eradication is undermined by increasing prevalence of emerging resistance to available drugs, fuelling ongoing demand for more complex diagnostic and treatment strategies. Early detection of TB drug resistance coupled with therapeutic decision making guided by rapid characterisation of pre-treatment and treatment emergent resistance remains the most effective strategy for averting Drug-Resistant TB (DR-TB) transmission, reducing DR-TB associated mortality, and improving patient outcomes. Solid- and liquid-based mycobacterial culture methods remain the gold standard for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection and drug susceptibility testing (DST). Unfortunately, delays to result return, and associated technical challenges from requirements for specialised resource and capacity, have limited DST use and availability in many high TB burden resource-limited countries. There is increasing availability of a variety of rapid nucleic acid-based diagnostic assays with adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect gene mutations associated with resistance to one or more drugs. While a few of these assays produce comprehensive calls for resistance to several first- and second-line drugs, there is still no endorsed genotypic drug susceptibility test assay for bedaquiline, pretomanid, and delamanid. The global implementation of regimens comprising these novel drugs in the absence of rapid phenotypic drug resistance profiling has generated a new set of diagnostic challenges and heralded a return to culture-based phenotypic DST. In this review, we describe the available tools for rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis and discuss the associated opportunities and challenges.

CRISPR-Based Diagnostics: A Potential Tool to Address the Diagnostic Challenges of Tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which infects more than 23% of the world’s population. With the emergence of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) and latent TB infection (LTBI), rapid diagnosis of DR-TB and LTBI has become a challenge for the prevention and control of TB. Herein, we highlight these challenges and discuss emerging clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based diagnostics in TB detection. Currently, the clinical diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection mainly depends on pathogenic and molecular biological methods, including sputum smear, sputum culture, and Xpert. Although CRISPR-based diagnostics have not been applied to the clinical diagnosis of TB, they have shown exciting preponderances in TB diagnosis compared with traditional methods, including higher sensitivity, less sample input, and shorter turnaround time. CRISPR-based diagnostics represent a potential tool to address the challenges and natural weaknesses associated with traditional TB diagnosis methods. Based on the currently available data, we suggest that future CRISPR-based TB diagnostics should be developed in the direction of automation, modularization, diversification, and intelligence. By combining the CRISPR platform with various systems, such as microfluidic chips, droplet microfluidics, electrochemical techniques, and optical systems, the specificity and sensitivity of TB diagnosis may be revolutionized.

Diagnostic Capacities for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the World Health Organization European Region: Action is Needed by all Member States

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently revised its guidelines for rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to investigate if TB reference diagnostic services are prepared to support these revisions. An online survey was performed among 44 TB National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) in the WHO European Region. Questions addressed the use of WHO-recommended molecular techniques for the diagnosis of drug-resistant TB, the techniques applied to investigate antimicrobial resistance, and questions on quality assurance. Among 35 of 44 (80%) participating NRLs, 29 of 35 (83%) reported using the GeneXpert platform as the initial test to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance. Five laboratories reported using another WHO-recommended, moderate-complexity, automated nucleic acid amplification test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid. Most (32 of 35; 91%) NRLs reported the capacity to test second-line drugs that have been in clinical use for many years (fluoroquinolones, linezolid, and injectable agents). Only 23 of 35 (66%) and 21 of 35 (60%) NRLs reported the capacity to test bedaquiline and clofazimine. Further efforts will be needed to improve the availability of quality-controlled testing against WHO Group A and Group B drugs. Earlier considerations on the scale-up of diagnostic capacities should be enforced as part of future approval processes for new antimycobacterial agents.

Whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for prediction of drug resistance.

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has shown tremendous potential in rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). In the current study, we performed WGS on drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained from Shanghai (n = 137) and Russia (n = 78). We aimed to characterise the underlying and high-frequency novel drug-resistance-conferring mutations, and also create valuable combinations of resistance mutations with high predictive sensitivity to predict multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) phenotype using a bootstrap method. Most strains belonged to L2.2, L4.2, L4.4, L4.5 and L4.8 lineages. We found that WGS could predict 82.07% of phenotypically drug-resistant domestic strains. The prediction sensitivity for rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STR), ofloxacin (OFL), amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP) was 79.71%, 86.30%, 76.47%, 88.37%, 83.33%, 70.00% and 70.00%, respectively. The mutation combination with the highest sensitivity for MDR prediction was rpoB S450L + rpoB H445A/P + katG S315T + inhA I21T + inhA S94A, with a sensitivity of 92.17% (0.8615, 0.9646), and the mutation combination with highest sensitivity for XDR prediction was rpoB S450L + katG S315T + gyrA D94G + rrs A1401G, with a sensitivity of 92.86% (0.8158, 0.9796). The molecular information presented here will be of particular value for the rapid clinical detection of MDR- and XDR-TB isolates through laboratory diagnosis.

Feasibility of Direct Sputum Molecular Testing for Drug Resistance as Part of Tuberculosis Clinical Trials Eligibility Screening.

A rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is critical for early initiation of effective therapy. Molecular testing with line probe assays (MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl) on culture isolates has been available for some time and significantly reduces the time to diagnosis of drug resistance. However, routine use of this test directly on sputum is less common. As part of enrollment screening procedures for tuberculosis clinical trials conducted in Hanoi, Vietnam, we evaluated the feasibility and performance of line probe assay (LPA) testing directly on sputum samples from 315 participants with no prior history of TB treatment. Test performance characteristics for the detection of rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) drug resistance as compared to culture-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) reference standard were calculated. LPA demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of drug resistance. Scaling up molecular testing on sputum as part of time-sensitive clinical trial screening procedures in high TB burden settings is feasible and will reduce both time to initiation of appropriate therapy and the risk of late exclusions due to microbiologic ineligibility.

Elucidation of drug resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from North India by whole-genome sequencing.

Rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is required for better patient management and treatment outcomes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can be used to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and deletions/insertions that are responsible for mostMycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance. WGS is being performed at scale in high-income countries, but there are limited reports of its use in India. In this study, 33 clinicalM. tuberculosis isolates from the Mycobacterial Repository in Chandigarh underwent WGS. Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Four isolates were excluded from the analysis due to culture contamination or mislabelling during the study. Among the remaining 29 isolates, 21 (72.4%) were multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and 1 (3.4%) was extensively-drug resistant TB (XDR-TB). The most common mutations observed for isoniazid, rifampicin, ofloxacin and kanamycin resistance werekatG(S315T), rpoB(S450L), gyrA(A90V) and rrs(A1401G), respectively. The isolates mainly belonged to lineages 2 and 3, with most MDR-TB among lineage 2 isolates. WGS ofM. tuberculosis isolates allows the detection of drug resistance to all drugs in a single test and also provides insight into the evolution and drug-resistant TB.

Novel diagnostics and therapeutics for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. This is at least partly due to late diagnosis and ineffective treatment of drug-resistant status. Selective search of the literature on DR-TB supplemented by recent guidelines from the World Health Organization. Better and more rapid diagnosis of DR-TB by new techniques such as Xpert Mtb/RIF are likely to make a substantial impact on the disease. New therapeutics for DR-TB are entering, or about to enter the market for the first time in decades. It is not clear whether new treatments should be restricted for DR-TB or also used for drug-susceptible tuberculosis. With several new agents on the horizon, there is the real possibility of an entirely new regimen for tuberculosis. An inexpensive 'near-patient' diagnostic test is still needed. Optimizing new drug combination regimens in a timely manner is urgently required.

Optimization of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay for four first-line drugs using Mycobacterium tuberculosis reference strains and clinical isolates

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the appropriate cut-off value and turnaround time of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay (MODS) for isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP), streptomycin (STR), and ethambutol (EMB). DesignA total of 39 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with confirmed drug susceptibility (reference strains) were tested with a range of drug concentrations to determine the optimal cut-off values for INH, RMP, STR, and EMB by MODS. Standard drug susceptibility testing (DST) results were evaluated relative to the Löwenstein–Jensen (L–J) proportion method. Following which, the performance of MODS was evaluated again using 36 sputum samples from patients with tuberculosis (TB) using the cut-off values determined in the aforementioned process. ResultsWith 39 reference strains, DST identified the following cut-off values: 0.8μg/ml INH (sensitivity, 96.0%; specificity, 92.9%), 2.0μg/ml RMP (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 95.5%), 4.0μg/ml STR (sensitivity, 90.5%; specificity, 93.8%), and 4.0μg/ml EMB (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 91.7%). When these cut-off values were used to analyze the 36 clinical isolates, the sensitivity and specificity of MODS were 100% and 93.1% for INH, 100% and 93.8% for RMP, 87.5% and 96.4% for STR, and 100% and 88.2% for EMB, respectively. The turnaround time for these clinical specimens was 9.0days by MODS (95% CI: 5.3–12.7), compared with 11.7days (95% CI: 9.5–13.9) for smear negative specimens. ConclusionOur study identified the optimal cut-off values of the four first-line drugs for MODS based on a wide concentration range. With the optimal cut-off values determined in this study, MODS showed high discriminatory efficiency for DST. This study also demonstrated that MODS is useful for rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant TB even for a smear negative specimen, despite the fact that it generally uses smear positive specimens as direct DST.

Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with Line Probe Assay for Detection of Rifampin-Monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The MTBDRplus line probe assay (LPA) and Xpert MTB/RIF have been endorsed by the World Health Organization for the rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, there is no clarity regarding the superiority of one over the other. In a double-blinded prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of the Xpert MTB/RIF on samples that were first tested by LPA under the revised national tuberculosis control program of India. A total of 405 sputum samples from suspected drug-resistant tuberculosis patients were included. Of these, 285 smear-positive samples were subjected to LPA. Seventy-two (25.8%) samples showed multidrug resistance, 62 (22.2%) showed rifampin monoresistance, 29 (10.3%) showed isoniazid monoresistance, and 116 (41.5%) were pan-susceptible. Six (2.1%) of the samples gave invalid results. Of the 62 rifampin-monoresistant samples by LPA, 38 (61.4%) showed rifampin resistance, while 21 (33.8%) were found susceptible to rifampin by Xpert MTB/RIF using cartridge version G4. Three (4.8%) samples gave an error. Of the 116 pan-susceptible samples, only 83 were available for Xpert MTB/RIF testing; 4 (5.1%) were rifampin resistant, 74 (94.8%) were susceptible, and 5 (6.0%) showed an error. The 25 discrepant samples were further subjected to MGIT960 drug susceptibility testing. The MGIT960 results showed 100% agreement with LPA results but only 64.4% agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF results. Sequencing analysis of discrepant samples showed 91.3% concordance with LPA but only 8.7% concordance with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. These findings indicate that by using Xpert MTB/RIF testing we might be underestimating the burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis and indicate that country-specific probes need to be designed to increase the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF.

Drug resistant tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is responsible for 1.4 million deaths annually. Wide-spread misuse of anti-tubercular drugs over three decades has resulted in emergence of drug resistant TB including multidrug-resistant TB and extensively drug-resistant TB globally. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant TB is one of the paramount importance for instituting appropriate clinical management and infection control measures. The present article provides an overview of the various diagnostic options available for drug resistant TB, by searching PubMed for recent articles. Rapid phenotypic tests still requires days to weeks to obtain final results, requiring biosafety and quality control measures. For newly developed molecular methods, infrastructure, training and quality assurance should be followed. Successful control of drug resistant TB globally will depend upon strengthening TB control programs, wider access to rapid diagnosis and provision of effective treatment. Therefore, political and fund provider commitment is essential to curb the spread of drug resistant TB.