RANK Ligand Inhibitor Research Articles

Place of rank ligand inhibitor in giant cell tumour of bone.

e23511 Background: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive and osteolytic tumour.The peak incidence is during the third and fourth decades of life. The majority of tumours occur in the metaepiphyseal (end) region of the long bones. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment option, if possible but it is a tumor which always poses progressive problems. Denosumab is indicated in recurrent or unresectable GCTB. Methods: We report a series of 70 patients treated for GCT at the medical oncology department of the CPMC (Algiers) in collaboration with the orthopedics department of Mustapha University Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. Results: 70 patients ( 50 women and 20 men). The sex ratio is 0.54 The average age is 22 years (11-54 years). Reason for consultation : - Pathological fracture: n = 10 - Pain: n = 30 - Functional impotence: n = 20 - Tumor mass: n = 5 - Concept of trauma: n = 5 Stage of the disease: -Localized: n = 29 -Recurrence: n = 30, -Recurrence + pulmonary metastases: n = 10, -Sarcomatous transformation: n = 1 Type of treatment: -Radiotherapy, n = 1 -Exercised biopsy: n = 10, -Curettage + cementoplasty: n = 50 -Exeresis with osteosynthesis material: n = 8, -Amputation : n = 1 Medical treatment: Denosumab: n = 45 The number of courses with denosumab was between 6 and 55 cycles. Denosumab was administered neoadjuvantly in 10 patients, in 20 patients with reccurence disease, 15 patients in the metastatic phase - In terms of toxicity, we noted moderate hypocalcemia in 3 patients. -Objective responses: 95% ORR, 5 complete radiological responses and 10 partial responses, 20 stable patients and 9 out of 10 patients who received neoadjuvant denosumab were able to operate.Progression Free Survival was 28 months. Conclusions: GCTs are aggressive tumors with intermediate malignancy that should not be underestimated. The treatment is essentially surgical. Denosumab is indicated for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, it allows obtaining a clear clinical and radiological improvement.

The Combined Effects of RhBMP-2 and Systemic RANKL Inhibitor in Patients With Bone Density Loss Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Observational Analysis With Propensity Score Matching.

The risks of nonunion and subsidence are high in patients with bone density loss undergoing spinal fusion surgery. The internal application of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in an interbody cage improves spinal fusion; however, related complications have been reported. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), hinders osteoblast differentiation and function. Therefore, this study aimed to observe the combined effect of the local application of rhBMP-2 in a lumbar cage and systemic RANKL inhibition on postoperative spinal fusion in patients with bone density loss undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). This retrospective observational study included 251 consecutive patients with spinal stenosis who underwent PLIF at a single center between 2017 and 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed, and radiographic evaluations included lumbar flexion, extension, range of motion, and subsidence. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify the combined effect of the treatment and the subsidence and spinal fusion status. One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. Denosumab treatment significantly reduced the rate of osteolysis (p = 0.013). When denosumab was administered in combination with rhBMP-2, the fusion status remained similar; however, the incidences of postoperative osteolysis and postoperative oozing day decreased. The combined use of rhBMP-2 and RANKL inhibition in patients with bone density loss can enhance bone formation after PLIF with fewer complications than rhBMP-2 alone.

Role of Actinomyces spp. and related organisms in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): Clinical evidence based on a case series.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an increasingly common consequence of antiresorptive treatment, which often leads to the development of necrotic exposed bone surfaces with inflammatory processes affecting the jawbone. Although the development of MRONJ is often associated with the inflammatory response or infections caused by the colonizing members of the oral microbiota, the exact pathogenesis of MRONJ is still not fully understood. In the present paper, we aimed to provide additional, microbiological culture-supported evidence, supporting the "infection hypothesis" that Actinomyces spp. and related organisms may play an important pathogenic role in the development of MRONJ and the resulting bone necrosis. In our case series, all patients presented with similar underlying conditions and anamnestic data, and have received antiresorptive medications (bisphosphonates or a RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitor) to prevent the occurrence or progression of bone metastases, secondary to prostate cancer. Nevertheless, a few years into antiresorptive drug therapy, varying stages of MRONJ was identified in the mentioned patients. In all three cases, quantitative microbiological culture of the necrotic bone samples yielded a complex microbiota, dominated by Actinomyces and Schaalia spp. with high colony counts. Additionally, our followed-up case series document the treatment of these patients with a combination of surgical intervention and long-term antibiotic therapy, where favourable clinical responses were seen is all cases. If the "infection hypothesis" is valid, it may have significant consequences in the preventative and therapeutic strategies associated with this disease.

Osteoporosis management in primary care.

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent bone disease in the US. Once diagnosed, osteoporosis requires ongoing management; therefore, primary care providers are vital in managing both primary and secondary fracture prevention. Safe, efficacious, and economical medications are available, but osteoporosis remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene, estrogen therapy/hormone therapy, parathyroid hormone analogues, RANK ligand inhibitors (denosumab), sclerostin inhibitors (romosozumab), and calcitonin are all drugs or drug classes commonly used to treat osteoporosis that are discussed in this article.

Co-targeting RANK pathway treats and prevents acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in luminal breast cancer

The combination of endocrine therapy (ET) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (CDK4/6i) was a hallmark in metastatic luminal breast cancer (BC). However, intrinsic and acquired resistance affects long-term efficacy. Here, we study the role of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) pathway in CDK4/6i resistance. We find that RANK overexpression in luminal BC is associated with intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i, both invitro and in mouse xenografts, and decreased proliferation rate and chronic interferon (IFN) γ response are highlighted as resistance drivers. Gene expression data from the NeoPalAna CDK4/6i clinical trial, and studies with palbociclib-resistant cell lines, show that RANK is upregulated after treatment with CDK4/6i, supporting a role in acquired resistance. Our study shows that RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitors can restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i and prevent acquired resistance. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that pharmacological inhibition of the RANK pathway through RANKL blocking could represent an add-on to ET+ CDK4/6i, warranting further clinical studies.

Endocrinology for the hepatologist.

Endocrinology for the hepatologist.

Personalization of Radiation Therapy in the Primary Treatment of Malignant Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (MESCC)

"True" malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is used here to describe a lesion compressing of infiltrating the spinal cord associated with neurologic deficits. Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment, for which several dose-fractionation regimens are available including single-fraction, short-course and longer-course regimens. Since these regimens are similarly effective regarding functional outcomes, patients with poor survival are optimally treated with short-course or even single-fraction radiotherapy. Longer-course radiotherapy results in better local control of malignant epidural spinal cord compression. Since most in-field recurrences occur 6 months or later, local control is particularly important for longer-term survivors who, therefore, should receive longer-course radiotherapy. It is important to estimate survival prior to treatment, which is facilitated by scoring tools. Radiotherapy should be supplemented by corticosteroids, if safely possible. Bisphosphonates and RANK-ligand inhibitors may improve local control. Selected patients can benefit from upfront decompressive surgery. Identification of these patients is facilitated by prognostic instruments considering degree of compression, myelopathy, radio-sensitivity, spinal stability, post-treatment ambulatory status, and patients' performance status and survival prognoses. Many factors including patients' preferences must be considered when designing personalized treatment regimens.

Inhibition of RANKL Expression in Osteocyte-like Differentiated Tumor Cells in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone After Denosumab Treatment.

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) are locally aggressive tumors with the histological features of giant cells and stromal cells. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the cytokine receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL). RANKL inhibition blocks tumor-induced osteoclastogenesis, and survival, and is used to treat unresectable GCTBs. Denosumab treatment induces osteogenic differentiation of GCTB cells. In this study, the expression of RANKL, special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2, a marker of osteoblast differentiation), and sclerostin/SOST (a marker of mature osteocytes) was analyzed before and after treatment with denosumab in six cases of GCTB. Denosumab therapy was administered a mean of five times over a mean 93.5-day period. Before denosumab treatment, RANKL expression was observed in one of six cases. After denosumab therapy, spindle-like cells devoid of giant cell aggregation were RANKL-positive in four of six cases. Bone matrix-embedded osteocyte markers were observed, although RANKL was not expressed. Osteocyte-like cells were confirmed to have mutations, as identified using mutation-specific antibodies. Our study results suggest that treatment of GCTBs with denosumab results in osteoblast-osteocyte differentiation. Denosumab played a role in the suppression of tumor activity via inhibition of the RANK-RANKL pathway, which triggers osteoclast precursors to differentiate into osteoclasts.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Primary Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass to Prevent Fractures in Adults: A Living Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians.

This guideline updates the 2017 American College of Physicians (ACP) recommendations on pharmacologic treatment of primary osteoporosis or low bone mass to prevent fractures in adults. The ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee based these recommendations on an updated systematic review of evidence and graded them using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The audience for this guideline includes all clinicians. The patient population includes adults with primary osteoporosis or low bone mass. ACP recommends that clinicians use bisphosphonates for initial pharmacologic treatment to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal females diagnosed with primary osteoporosis (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence). ACP suggests that clinicians use bisphosphonates for initial pharmacologic treatment to reduce the risk of fractures in males diagnosed with primary osteoporosis (conditional recommendation; low-certainty evidence). ACP suggests that clinicians use the RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) as a second-line pharmacologic treatment to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal females diagnosed with primary osteoporosis who have contraindications to or experience adverse effects of bisphosphonates (conditional recommendation; moderate-certainty evidence). ACP suggests that clinicians use the RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) as a second-line pharmacologic treatment to reduce the risk of fractures in males diagnosed with primary osteoporosis who have contraindications to or experience adverse effects of bisphosphonates (conditional recommendation; low-certainty evidence). ACP suggests that clinicians use the sclerostin inhibitor (romosozumab, moderate-certainty evidence) or recombinant PTH (teriparatide, low-certainty evidence), followed by a bisphosphonate, to reduce the risk of fractures only in females with primary osteoporosis with very high risk of fracture (conditional recommendation). ACP suggests that clinicians take an individualized approach regarding whether to start pharmacologic treatment with a bisphosphonate in females over the age of 65 with low bone mass (osteopenia) to reduce the risk of fractures (conditional recommendation; low-certainty evidence).

Management of giant cell tumor of bone in the era of denosumab: A case series and review of the literature

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone also known as osteoclastoma typically arises from the meta-epiphyseal region of the long bone and comprises 5% of all bone tumors and 20% of benign bone tumors. Understanding pathogenesis is the key to successful systemic therapy with denosumab, a RANK-ligand inhibitor. In this context, we report seven GCT bone-treated denosumab and radiotherapy cases with a diverse clinical presentation from our institute, NRS Medical College, and Hospital Kolkata.

Bone health program: A community cancer center's experience.

360 Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are an essential treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Estrogen deficiency caused by AIs has adverse effects on bone health. Studies reveal that 5 years of treatment with anastrozole led to 6.1% of bone loss at the lumbar spine and 7.2% at the hip. The aim of the project is to identify the current degree of attention to bone health and skeletal-related complications in women with early-stage breast cancer stages I-III that are on AIs at a community cancer center at Einstein Medical Center Montgomery. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 63 patients ages 50-85 diagnosed with early-stage I-III breast cancer on an AI in the adjuvant setting. Patients who started on an AI between January 2013 through December 2017 were included. Data on Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (DEXA) and treatment at baseline, 2-years, and 4-years were analyzed. We followed to see if they had a DEXA scan every 2 years after the baseline DEXA scan for the following 4 years and analyzed information on their bone health. Results: Patients included were on an AI throughout the 4 years. The median age was 60.2 years. 46/63 (73%) had a baseline DEXA scan. Out of these, 12/63 had a normal bone density. 28/63 had osteopenia, of which 16/28 were treated. 6/63 had osteoporosis and only 2/6 were treated. After 2 years, 39/63 (61%) had a 2-year DEXA scan. Of these, 8 had a normal bone density. 26/63 had osteopenia of which 21/26 were treated. 5/63 had osteoporosis and all 5 were treated for this. At 4 years, 40/63 (63%) had baseline DEXA scans. 9/63 had a normal bone density. 21/63 had osteopenia, out of which 17/21 were treated. 10/63 had osteoporosis of which 5/10 were treated. Conclusions: Patients who are being treated with aromatase inhibitors should be evaluated for baseline bone health prior to initiating AIs and every 2 years thereafter. Treatment with bisphosphonates or RANK ligand inhibitors is recommended at an earlier T-score compared to post-menopausal osteoporosis in the absence of breast cancer. In our study, we noticed that the number of patients who did not receive a DEXA scan at the correct time points increased during the period of treatment with the AI. About 53% of patients had osteopenia or osteoporosis at the time of initiation of AIs. The amount of osteoporosis in patients increased from 9.5% at baseline to 15.8% at the 4-year point. This data indicates the need for proper guidelines on DEXA scans and interventions for this patient population. Current interventions planned are patient education Flyers, a patient risk factor checklist in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) and prompts to review the status of the DEXA report when ordering AIs.

The pathophysiologic basis of prostate cancer review

Worldwide, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the sixth leading cause of cancer death in men. Diagnosis is primarily based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, MRI scans, and prostate tissue biopsies, although PSA testing for screening remains controversial. New diagnostic technologies including risk stratification bioassay tests, germline testing, and various PET scans are now available. When the cancer is limited to the prostate, it is considered localized and potentially curable. If the disease has spread outside the prostate, bisphosphonates, rank ligand inhibitors, hormonal treatment, chemotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, immunotherapy, focused radiation, and other targeted therapies can be used. This activity is a current, comprehensive review of the evaluation and management of patients with prostate cancer and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in improving care for affected patients. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a terminal diagnosis with an aggressive disease course despite currently approved therapeutics. Despite many recent advances in the therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the disease remains incurable, although men suffering from this disease are living considerably longer.

Blockade of Osteoclast-Mediated Bone Resorption With a RANKL-Inhibitor Enhances Bone Formation in a Rat Spinal Fusion Model.

Rat spine fusion model. The present study aimed to determine whether administration of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in a rat model of spinal fusion increases bone volume, bone density, and decreases osteoclasts in the fusion mass. OPG is a soluble RANK-ligand inhibitor that blocks osteoclast differentiation and activation. This makes it a potential agent to control the remodeling process and enhance bone mass during spinal fusion. Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats received a one-level spinal fusion of L4-L5 with bone allograft. Rats were then divided into four groups according to initiation of treatment: (1) saline on day 0 (saline), (2) OPG on day 0 (OPG D0), (3) OPG on day 10 (OPG D10), and (4) OPG on day 21 (OPG D21) postsurgery. After their initial injection, rats received weekly subcutaneous injections of OPG (10mg/kg) and were euthanized six weeks postsurgery. MicroCT analysis of the fusion site and histological analysis of bone surface for quantification of osteoclast lining was performed. Increased bone volume in the fusion site and around the spinous process was seen in OPG D0 and OPG D10 when compared with saline. Mean trabecular thickness was greater in all groups receiving OPG compared with saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having significantly greater mean trabecular thickness than OPG D21. All OPG groups had less bone surface lined with osteoclasts when compared with Saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having fewer than OPG D21. This study indicates that OPG inhibited osteoclast bone resorption, which led to greater bone at the fusion site. Future studies investigating OPG on its own or in combination with an osteogenic factor to improve spinal fusion outcomes are warranted to further elucidate its potential therapeutic effect.

Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the 2021 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.

To review evidence regarding osteoporosis screening, prevention, diagnosis, and management in the past decade and update the position statement published by The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) in 2010 regarding the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women as new therapies and paradigms have become available. NAMS enlisted a panel of clinician experts in the field of metabolic bone diseases and/or women's health to review and update the 2010 NAMS position statement and recommendations on the basis of new evidence and clinical judgement. The panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees. Osteoporosis, especially prevalent in older postmenopausal women, increases the risk of fractures that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Postmenopausal bone loss, related to estrogen deficiency, is the primary contributor to osteoporosis. Other important risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis include advanced age, genetics, smoking, thinness, and many diseases and drugs that impair bone health. An evaluation of these risk factors to identify candidates for osteoporosis screening and recommending nonpharmacologic measures such as good nutrition (especially adequate intake of protein, calcium, and vitamin D), regular physical activity, and avoiding smoking and excessive alcohol consumption are appropriate for all postmenopausal women. For women at high risk for osteoporosis, especially perimenopausal women with low bone density and other risk factors, estrogen or other therapies are available to prevent bone loss. For women with osteoporosis and/or other risk factors for fracture, including advanced age and previous fractures, the primary goal of therapy is to prevent new fractures. This is accomplished by combining nonpharmacologic measures, drugs to increase bone density and to improve bone strength, and strategies to reduce fall risk. If pharmacologic therapy is indicated, government-approved options include estrogen agonists/antagonists, bisphosphonates, RANK ligand inhibitors, parathyroid hormone-receptor agonists, and inhibitors of sclerostin. Osteoporosis is a common disorder in postmenopausal women. Management of skeletal health in postmenopausal women involves assessing risk factors for fracture, reducing modifiable risk factors through dietary and lifestyle changes, and the use of pharmacologic therapy for patients at significant risk of osteoporosis or fracture. For women with osteoporosis, lifelong management is necessary. Treatment decisions occur continuously over the lifespan of a postmenopausal woman. Decisions must be individualized and should include the patient in the process of shared decision-making.

Bone modifying agents and skeletal related events in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

e18593 Background: Bone metastases and skeletal related events (SREs) are a common cause of morbidity among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). SREs include pathologic bone fractures, spinal cord compression, orthopedic surgery/stabilization, and palliative radiation to bone. Bone modifying agents (BMA) such as bisphosphonates and RANK ligand inhibitors are often used for mNSCLC patients with bone metastases to reduce the incidence of SRE. Data on the associations between BMA use and overall survival (OS) and the development of SRE among patients with mNSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with first line pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy at The Ohio State University from 2017-2020. The associations between SRE and categorical variables were studied using Fisher’s exact test and with continuous variables using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between BMA and risk of osseous progression was studied using Fisher’s exact test. The association between BMA and OS was examined using a Cox proportional hazard model. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% CI. OS was calculated from date of ICI initiation to death from any cause or last follow up. Results: We identified a cohort of 228 patients: 107 (47%) treated with pembrolizumab and 121 (53%) treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy; 48 (21%) had squamous histology and 179 (79%) had nonsquamous histology (1 had NSCLC histology not specified); median age 62.6 years; median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI: 17.2 – 34.5 months). A total of 95/228 (42%) patients had bone metastases at time of ICI initiation; 45/95 (42%) had treatment with BMA and 50/95 (58%) were not treated with BMA. Among patients with bone metastases at time of ICI, 45 (42%) developed SRE after ICI initiation and BMA use was not associated with risk of SRE (p = 1). BMA use was not significantly associated with risk of osseous progression (p = 0.21). For patients with baseline bone metastases prior to ICI, the use of BMA was not associated with OS (p = 0.24); the type of BMA used (bisphosphonate vs RANK ligand inhibitor) was also not associated with OS (p = 0.13). Conclusions: In patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first line pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy, bone modifying agents were not associated with OS, decreased risk of osseous progression, or development of SRE in patients with baseline bone metastases prior to ICI initiation. The type of BMA used was also not associated with survival. Further studies evaluating the utility and impact of BMA use in this patient population are needed.

The role of antiresorptive drugs and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in nononcologic immunosuppressed patients: A systematic review.

Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe condition affecting the jaws of patients exposed to specific drugs, and is primarily described in patients receiving bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. However, more recently it has been observed in patients taking other medications, such as the RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) and antiangiogenic drugs. It has been proposed that the existence of other concomitant medical conditions may increase the incidence of MRONJ. The primary aim of this research was to analyze all available evidence and evaluate the reported outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) due to antiresorptive drugs in immunosuppressed patients. A multi-database (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) systematic search was performed. The search generated twenty-seven studies eligible for the analysis. The total number of patients included in the analysis was two hundred and six. All patients were deemed to have some form of immunosuppression, with some patients having more than one disorder contributing to their immunosuppression. Within this cohort the commonest trigger for MRONJ was a dental extraction (n=197). MRONJ complications and recurrence after treatment was sparsely reported in the literature, however a total of fourteen cases were observed. The data reviewed have confirmed that an invasive procedure is the commonest trigger of MRONJ with relatively high frequency of post-operative complications or recurrence following management. However, due to low-quality research available in the literature it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the outcomes analysed in this systematic review.

Retrospective Analysis of the Relationship between Time to Anti-Resorptive Therapy and Incidence of Skeletal Related Events in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Background Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm causing a proliferation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that causes end organ damage in the form of hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and lytic bone lesions. Specifically, patients with MM are at risk for developing significant bone disease eventually leading to development of skeletal related events (SRE) (pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and/or need for radiotherapy or surgery to bone). It is well established that the use of anti-resorptive agents (i.e. Bisphosphonates, Denosumab) lead to fewer bony lesions, less severe bone disease, and fewer SREs. However, while anti-resorptive therapy is recommended for all MM patients undergoing treatment, it is common for initiation of anti-resorptive therapy to be delayed due to the need for dental clearance, clinician preference, or relative contraindications to the medications. Current studies show that this therapy is overall underutilized, likely for similar reasons. However, the effect on SRE with regards to time to initiation of anti-resorptive agent has not been well studied. Herein, we conducted a retrospective analysis to determine if time to anti-resorptive agent has an effect on incidence of SREs. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using our Electronic Health Record system to identify and analyze data of patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma from July 1st, 2016 until June 30th, 2019 to determine whether time to anti-resorptive therapy affects the incidence of SRE. Patients previously treated with bisphosphonates, and patients not treated with anti-resorptive therapy were excluded. The study's primary endpoint was probability of developing SRE based on time to anti-resorptive therapy. The relationship between incidence of SREs and time to anti-resorptive therapy, sex, age, ISS stage at diagnosis, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and prior SRE present at diagnosis was analyzed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. The cutoff point of anti-resorptive therapy delay was based on the recursive partitioning of univariable Cox model. Results: Three hundred and seventy-five patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients were identified. In total, 237 patients were included in the final analysis. Demographic information is detailed in the table provided. Of these, 208 patients (88%) used bisphosphonates and 29 (12%) used a RANK ligand inhibitor as their anti-resorptive agent. The median time to therapy was 55 days (IQR 135 days). One hundred twenty four (55%) patients had an SRE present at diagnosis. Forty-one (15.2%) patients developed a new SRE after initiation of anti-resorptive therapy. The model showed that patients who had a delay to anti-resorptive therapy of 31 days or greater had a higher risk of developing SRE after diagnosis (HR 2.49, 95% CI 0.95-6.55, p=0.064). In addition, when comparing ISS II to ISS I, patients with ISS II disease had a higher risk of developing SRE (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.02-7.57, p=0.045). Conclusions: Patients with longer delays to anti-resorptive therapy had higher risk of developing SRE after diagnosis, however the difference was not statistically significant. One explanation for this may be that starting anti-resorptive therapy at any time point may be more important than time it takes to start therapy in the setting of effective anti-myeloma treatment. However, the rate of SRE in this study was lower than initially predicted based on previous studies, and therefore, our sample size may have been too small to detect a significant outcome related to time to initiation of anti-resorptive agents. Ongoing efforts to increase the sample size through multi-institutional initiatives are underway. Disclosures Binder: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy.

Overall survival in mCPRC patients treated with Radium-223 in association with bone health agents: a national multicenter study

Purpose Radium-223 has demonstrated efficacy in improving overall survival (OS) and in delaying symptomatic skeletal-related events (SREs). Bone Health Agents (BHA), i.e. RANK ligand inhibitor (Denosumab) and bisphosphonate such as zoledronic acid, are indicated to prevent SREs without a clear survival benefit. SREs on patient health have a high impact and it is, therefore, important to consider the role of new therapies with BHA to better understand the involvement of combination therapy. The primary aim of this multicentric study is to assess OS in mCRPC patients treated with Radium-223 in combination with BHA. Materials and methods 430 consecutive patients treated with Radium-223 alone or in combination with BHA, affected by mCRPC, from January 2015 to July 2019 in six Italian Nuclear Medicine Units, were included. Furthermore, data were collected at baseline, after every Radium-223 administration, and during follow-up, at 3 and 6 months and 1 year after the 6th cycle. Clinical data have been evaluated before starting treatment with Radium-223 and at the end of treatment and/or at progression. Patients who received target bone therapy with BHA before Radium-223 treatment together with patients who did not receive this therapy at all (NO BHA GROUP), were compared to patients treated with concomitant Radium-223 and BHA (BHA GROUP). Results In univariate models (p < .05) several clinical aspects have an impact on OS: concomitant BHA (p = .018), BMI (p .001), ECOG PS (p = .000), Baseline Hb (p = .000), Baseline PSA (p = .000), Baseline tALP (p = .000), Baseline LDH (p = .000), and Baseline neutrophils (p = .009). Baseline Hb, Baseline tALP, and Baseline LDH have been confirmed as statistically significant parameters in multivariate models. Indeed, concomitant BHA has not a significant impact on OS (p = .244) in multivariate models. Conclusions At univariate analysis, our data showed that NO BHA GROUP and BHA GROUP differ in OS by 7 months (95%CI: (1–16.4), p = .02). This is not confirmed at multivariate analysis where after adjusting for other baseline factors, BHA is not significant anymore. This is clearly explained as bias by indication: patients with the same levels of tALP, Hb, and LDH receiving or not receiving BHA are expected to have a similar survival. Our results support and confirm the role of Radium-223 therapy on OS and, furthermore, appear to confirm that BHA treatment has not a survival benefit.

The Role of the RANKL/RANK Axis in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Anti-RANKL.

The receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and the RANK ligand (RANKL) were reported in the regulation of osteoclast differentiation/activation and bone homeostasis. Additionally, the RANKL/RANK axis is a significant mediator of progesterone-driven mammary epithelial cell proliferation, potentially contributing to breast cancer initiation and progression. Moreover, several studies supported the synergistic effect of RANK and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and described RANK’s involvement in epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)-positive carcinogenesis. Consequently, anti-RANKL treatment has been proposed as a new approach to preventing and treating breast cancer and metastases. Recently, RANKL/RANK signaling pathway inhibition has been shown to modulate the immune environment and enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies against solid tumors. Clinical and experimental trials have emerged evaluating RANKL inhibition as an enhancer of the immune response, rendering resistant tumors responsive to immune therapies. Trials evaluating the combinatorial effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-RANKL treatment in double-positive (RANK+/ERBB2+) patients are encouraging.

A case of minimal change disease after the administration of anti receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) monoclonal antibody: a case report

BackgroundMinimal change disease (MCD) is one of the causes of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in adults. The pathogenesis of proteinuria in MCD has not been fully understood. Recently, it has been reported that the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL) may contribute to the podocyte biology in kidney diseases. Denosumab is a human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody used to treat osteoporosis. Here we report a case of MCD after denosumab administration.Case presentationA 59-year-old male without any episodes of proteinuria was given denosumab to treat osteoporosis. Two weeks after its administration, he noticed a foamy urine and bilateral pretibial edema. Laboratory tests revealed that he had severe proteinuria (15g/g Cr), hypoproteinemia (4.0g/dL), and hypoalbuminemia (1.5g/dL). Based on the results, he was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome. The proteinuria selectivity index was 0.05, indicating selective proteinuria. Renal biopsy showed minor glomerular abnormality with less tubulointerstitial damage, and electron microscopy showed extensive foot process effacement, indicating MCD. With all these results, glucocorticoid therapy of 50mg/day prednisolone was started. After 4weeks of treatment, the urinary protein level remains high (3.1g/g Cr). Prednisolone therapy was continued, and the levels of proteinuria decreased gradually to the range of partial remission (1.2g/g Cr) with another 7weeks of prednisolone treatment, but complete remission was not achieved.ConclusionsThis might be a case wherein RANKL inhibition is associated with the pathogenesis of MCD. Further studies will be needed to elucidate the causal relationship of RANK-RANKL signaling to the pathogenesis of MCD.