Randomized Crossover Manikin Study Research Articles

Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study

BackgroundFor both normal and difficult airway management, VL is thought to be more effective. However, VL seems far from being offered as a standard option in both healthcare delivery and educational activities in low-income countries, considering its high costs. Therefore, three-dimensional(3D)printed VLs may be considered an alternative to conventional VLs in low-income countries and other places with limited resources. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of AirAngel 3D-printed VL (3D-PVL) with those of commercially available Storz® VL (SVL) and conventional Macintosh® laryngoscope (MCL) in normal and difficult airway scenarios in the hands of inexperienced users.MethodsThis is a prospective randomized crossover manikin study that included 126 senior medical students with no experience in intubation. The effectiveness of all three laryngoscopy devices in the hands of inexperienced users was evaluated in terms of intubation time, glottic visualization, ease of use, endotracheal tube placement, and intubation success rate. Between 2020 and 2022, 126 last year medical students participated in the study.ResultsMCL resulted in significantly longer intubation times than 3D-PVL and SVL in the difficult airway scenario, with no significant difference between 3DPVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction MCL: 28.54 s; SVL: 26.68 s; 3DPVL: 26.64 s). Both SVL and 3D-PVL resulted in significantly better Cormack − Lehane grades in both normal and difficult airway scenarios, and thus provided better glottic viewing than MCL, with no significant difference between 3D-PVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction, MCL: 1.73; SVL: 1.29; 3DPVL: 1.25). The SVL was the easiest device to use for normal airway scenarios (1: very easy, 5: very difficult), while the MCL was the most difficult (MCL: 2.64; 3DPVL: 1.98; SVL: 1.49). Conversely, no significant difference was found between 3DPVL and other devices in terms of ease of use in difficult airway scenarios and in terms of accurate placement of the endotracheal tube and successful intubation attempts.Conclusion3D-PVL is a good educational and possible clinical alternative to conventional VL, particularly in places with limited resources, due to its low cost.

Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-View, Non-Channeled Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the results obtained with three different types of video laryngoscopes (UESCOPE VL-400, I-View, Non-Channeled Aitraq) with and without an endotracheal stylet should be better than the results obtained with a Macintosh laryngoscope in a simulated out-of-hospital scenario by a person without clinical experience. Primary outcome measures were the time taken to successfully achieve tracheal intubation (TI). Secondary outcomes included the grade of glottic view (Cormack and Lehane grades 1-4), the incidence of successful TI, the number of audible dental clicks indicating potential dental damage, the level of effort required to perform TI, and the operator's comfort during the procedure. The time required to achieve tracheal intubation successfully was significantly longer with the Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq than with the other video laryngoscopes. The use of the stylet significantly reduced the time required for tracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope (21.8 sec. vs. 24.0 sec., p = 0.026), UESCOPE VL 400 (18.1 sec. vs. 23.4 sec., p = 0.013), and Airtraq (22.7 sec. vs. 34.5 sec., p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in intubation time when using the I-View with or without stylets. No differences were observed in the Cormack-Lehane grading. The success rate of intubation was 100% for the Macintosh and I-View laryngoscopes used with or without stylets and for the UESCOPE VL 400 and Airtraq laryngoscopes used with stylets. Without stylets, the success rate of intubation was 96.6% for the UESCOPE VL 400 and 86.6% for the Airtraq. There were no significant differences in the risk of dental damage between the Macintosh, UESCOPE VL 400, I-View, and Airtraq laryngoscopes, regardless of the use of stylets (without and with stylets). The use of stylets significantly reduced dental damage only for the Airtraq laryngoscope: 8 (26.6%) vs. 2 (6.6%). Statistically significant differences in perceived exertion were observed between the mentioned laryngoscopes, both with and without stylets. However, there were no differences in the comfort of use between the laryngoscopes, regardless of the use of stylets (without and with stylets. The use of stylets led to better comfort in the case of the Macintosh (2.5 vs. 3, p = 0.043) and UESCOPE VL 400 (2 vs. 3, p = 0.008) laryngoscopes. In our study, the I-View and UESCOPE VL-400 video laryngoscopes provided better intubation results than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of time needed to intubate, glottis visibility, and reduction in dental damage. The use of the stylet did not significantly improve the intubation results compared to the results obtained in direct laryngoscopy. Due to the small study group and the manikin model, additional studies should be performed on a larger study group.

A novel CPR-assist device vs. established chest compression techniques in infant CPR: A manikin study

IntroductionGuidelines for infant CPR recommend the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTT) and the two-finger technique (TFT) for chest compression. Some devices have been designed to assist with infant CPR, but are often not readily available. Syringe plungers may serve as an alternative infant CPR assist device given their availability in most hospitals. In this study, we aimed to determine whether CPR using a syringe plunger could improve CPR quality measurements on the Resusci-Baby manikin compared with traditional methods of infant CPR. MethodsCompression area with a diameter of 1 to 2 cm is recommended in previous infant CPR device researches. In this is a randomized crossover manikin study, we examined the efficacy of the Syringe Plunger Technique (SPT) which uses the plunger of the 20 ml syringe with a 2 cm diameter flat piston, commonly available in hospital, for infant External Chest Compressions (ECC). Participants performed TTT, TFT and SPT ECC on Resusci® Baby QCPR® according to 2020 BLS guidelines. ResultsSixty healthcare providers participated in this project. The median (IQR) ECC depths in the TTT, TFT and SPT in the first minute were 41 mm (40–42), 40 mm (38–41) and 40 mm (39–41), respectively, with p < 0.001. The median (IQR) ECC recoil in the TTT, TFT and SPT groups in the first minute was 15% (1–93), 64% (18–96) and 53% (8–95), respectively, with p = 0.003. The result in the second minute had similar findings. The SPT had the best QCPR score and less fatigue. ConclusionThe performance of chest compression depth and re-rebound ratio was statistically different among the three groups. TTT has good ECC depth and depth accuracy but poor recoil. TFT is the complete opposite. SPT can achieve a depth close to TTT and has a good recoil performance as TFT. Regarding comprehensive performance, SPT obtains the highest QCPR score, and SPT is also less fatigued. SPT may be an effective alternative technique for infant CPR.

Effect of cooled tracheal tubes on time to intubate and first pass intubation success in novice intubators: A randomized crossover manikin study

Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tubes (TTs) may change in stiffness with changing temperatures. Cooling an TT may increase its rigidity and may assist in maintaining its slope at the tip. In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of a cooled TT on intubation time and first pass success. In a randomized cross-over design, senior medical students without prior intubation experience performed intubation with a direct laryngoscope on a manikin. During the first group's intubations, cooled TTs were used first and then room temperature TTs, while the second group performed it vice versa. The primary outcome was the time to intubation. As secondary outcomes, first pass success, esophageal intubation, and dental click were measured. The study included 21 participants. Cooled TT intubations (61.9%) had significantly higher first-pass success rates than room temperature TT intubations (33.3%) (p = 0.031). When room temperature TT was used for intubations, the mean time to intubation was 14.33 (95% CI 5.59–23.08) seconds longer than when cooled TT was used (p = 0.003). In terms of esophageal intubation and dental click rates, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.754, p = 0.99, respectively). In this manikin study, we observed that novice intubators performed intubation with improved time to intubate and higher first pass success using cooled TT.

Assessment of the Possibility of Using the Laryngoscopes Macintosh, McCoy, Miller, Intubrite, VieScope and I-View for Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions by People without Clinical Experience: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the laryngoscopes Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Intubrite, VieScope and I-View in simulated out-of-hospital conditions when used by people without clinical experience, and to choose the one that, in the case of failure of the first intubation (FI), gives the highest probability of successful second (SI) or third (TI). For FI, the highest success rate (HSR) was observed for I-View and the lowest (LSR) for Macintosh (90% vs. 60%; p < 0.001); for SI, HSR was observed for I-View and LSR for Miller (95% vs. 66,7%; p < 0001); and for TI, HSR was observed for I-View and LSR for Miller, McCoy and VieScope (98.33% vs. 70%; p < 0.001). A significant shortening of intubation time between FI and TI was observed for Macintosh (38.95 (IQR: 30.1-47.025) vs. 32.4 (IQR: 29-39.175), p = 0.0132), McCoy (39.3 (IQR: 31.1-48.15) vs. 28.75 (IQR: 26.475-35.7), p < 0.001), Intubrite (26.4 (IQR: 21.4-32.3) vs. 20.7 (IQR: 18.3-24.45), p < 0.001), and I-View (21 (IQR: 17.375-25.1) vs. 18 (IQR: 15.95-20.5), p < 0.001). According to the respondents, the easiest laryngo- scopes to use were I-View and Intubrite, while the most difficult was Miller. The study shows that I-View and Intubrite are the most useful devices, combining high efficiency with a statistically significant reduction in time between successive attempts.

Retromolar intubation with video intubating stylet in difficult airway: A randomized crossover manikin study

ObjectiveDifficult airway situations, such as trismus and neck rigidity, may prohibit standard midline orotracheal intubation. An alternative route of intubation from the retromolar space using a fiberoptic scope or rigid intubation stylet has been reported. There is no study investigating the applicability of retromolar intubation using a video intubating stylet. This study comparatively analyzed difficult airway management using a video intubating stylet in the retromolar and standard midline approaches. MethodsA randomized crossover manikin study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2021 at a tertiary teaching hospital. Thirty-six emergency medicine residents and attending physicians were enrolled, and all participated in an educational course regarding video intubating stylet in standard midline and retromolar approaches. Then, they performed both intubation approaches in a randomized order on a manikin seven times with different airway settings each time. The duration of successful intubation, first attempt success rate, overall success rate, number of attempts, and self-reported difficulty were recorded and compared. ResultsThirty-six emergency physicians were included in the study. Compared with the standard midline approach, the use of the retromolar approach significantly reduced the duration of successful intubation in difficult airway scenarios such as limited mouth opening and neck rigidity with (44.77 [28.58–63.65] vs. 120 [93.86–120] s, p < 0.001) and without tongue edema (31.5 [22.57–57.74] vs. 44.72 [36.23–65.34] s, p = 0.012). Furthermore, the retromolar approach increased the first attempt success rate in scenarios of limited mouth opening and neck rigidity with (91.67% vs. 16.67%, p < 0.001) and without (97.22% vs. 72.22%, p = 0.012) tongue edema. The self-reported difficulty was also significantly lower with the retromolar approach than with the standard approach in the above two scenarios. ConclusionsThe retromolar approach for intubation using a video intubating stylet may be a promising choice for selected patients with a combination of difficult airway features such as limited mouth opening, neck rigidity, and edematous tongue.

Endotracheal intubation in a ramped versus supine position in the emergency department: A randomised crossover manikin study

Background: Performing endotracheal intubation by placing patients in a ramped position has been shown to improve the ease of intubation and to reduce complications. The above findings, however, were only established in the operation theatre and intensive care settings. Objective: In order to establish the findings in the setting of the emergency department, we attempt to compare the ramped versus supine positions in normal and difficult airway scenarios. Methods: Medical doctors practicing at a local Accident and Emergency Department were recruited into a crossover randomised study. They were asked to perform intubations on a manikin in four scenarios. The manikin was put in a ramp or supine position. In addition, the manikin settings were adjusted to normal and difficult airways. Results: A total of 39 Accident and Emergency Department doctors were recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the first-attempt success rates using the ramped position compared to supine position in either airway scenario (100% vs. 97.4%, P = 1 in normal airway, 79.5% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.789 in difficult airway). The mean intubation time in difficult airway setting was shorter when the manikin was put into ramped position (28.3 s vs. 38.4 s, P = 0.134). The ramped position improved the glottic view in the difficult airway setting ( P = 0.017). More intubators preferred to place the manikin into a ramped position during difficult airway setting (67%, P = 0.007). Experienced male intubators performed better in normal airway scenarios, whereas Accident and Emergency Department fellows performed better in difficult airway scenarios. Conclusion: The ramped position improves glottic view and operator ease when intubating a simulated difficult airway.

Rescuer Exertion and Fatigue Using Two-Thumb vs. Two-Finger Method During Simulated Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Background: Rescuer fatigue during neonatal CPR can affect CPR quality leading to reduced cerebral and myocardial perfusion.Aim: To investigate rescuer fatigue during simulated neonatal CPR using both objective (heart rate and cardiac output) and subjective measures.Methods: A randomized crossover manikin study performed. Nineteen doctors working in neonatology were randomized to (a) two-thumb term, (b) two-finger term, (c) two-thumb preterm, or (d) two-finger preterm group. Cardiac output and heart rate were measured with a non-invasive cardiac output monitor. A Likert scale assessed participants' level of perceived exertion.Results: In the preterm group, the mean change in HR from rest to 5 min in the TT group was 11.58 bpm (SD 6.22) vs. 9.94 bpm (SD 8.48), (p-value 0.36). There was no difference in change in CO, 2.10 (SD 1.15) in the TT group vs. 1.39 (SD 1.63) in TF group (p value 0.23). There was no difference in BORG RPE rating. In the term group, the mean change in HR from rest to 5 min was 15 bpm (SD 8.40) in TT group and 13 bpm (SD 7.86) in TF group, (p-value 0.416). The median change in CO from rest to 5 min was 1.50 (0.78 to 2.42 IQR) in TT group vs. 1.60 (0.65 to 3.0 IQR) in TF group.Conclusion: Providing chest compressions is associated with an increase in both heart rate and cardiac output. We did not identify difference between objective and subjective measures of fatigue between either technique in a preterm or term model.

Analysis of the quality of chest compressions during resuscitation in an understaffed team — randomised crossover manikin study

INTRODUCTION: According to the chain of survival, chest compressions (CCs) are crucial in every cardiac arrest patient. It is very challenging to provide high-quality resuscitation in a two-paramedic team. The task of an automatic chest compression device (ACCD) is to relieve the rescuer and improve the quality of CCs. Its influence on the quality of the whole resuscitation as well as the survival of patients is still subject to discussion worldwide. This study aimed to assess the quality of CCs during resuscitation in a two-paramedic team using ACCD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This research was designed as a prospective, randomised, cross-over, high-fidelity simulation study. Fifty-two double paramedic teams took part in the research. The role of the participants was to conduct full advanced resuscitation in a human patient’s simulator. Each team provided resuscitation twice. Once with an ACCD and once using manual compressions. Chest compression quality parameters, as well as chest compression fraction (CCF), were measured. RESULTS : Statistically significant differences were found between manual and automated compressions in: mean depth (48 ± 4 mm vs. 56 ± 3 mm, p < 0.0001), mean rate (117 ± 9 mm vs. 103 ± 1 mm, p < 0.0001), percentage of CC with correct depth (46 ± 25 vs. 87 ± 13, p < 0.0001), rate (72 ± 22 vs. 96 ± 4, p < 0.0001), and recoil (55 ± 23 vs. 89 ± 13, p < 0.0001). CCF was also higher when the ACCD was used (74 ± 7% vs. 83 ± 2%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an ACCD increases the quality of compressions by improving CCF, chest recoil, and the percentage of compressions performed with adherence to guidelines.

Comparison of i-Gel as a Conduit for Intubation between under Fiberoptic Guidance and Blind Endotracheal Intubation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Simulation Study.

Purpose This study aimed to compare intubation performances among i-gel blind intubation (IGI), i-gel bronchoscopic intubation (IBRI), and intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) applying two kinds of endotracheal tube during chest compressions. We hypothesized that IGI using wire-reinforced silicone (WRS) tube could achieve endotracheal intubation most rapidly and successfully. Methods In 23 emergency physicians, a prospective randomized crossover manikin study was conducted to examine the three intubation techniques using two kinds of endotracheal tubes. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The secondary outcome was the cumulative success rate for each intubation technique. A significant difference was considered when identifying p < 0.05 between two devices or p < 0.017 in post hoc analysis of the comparison among three devices. Results The mean intubation time using IGI was shorter (p < 0.017) than that of using IBRI and MCL in both endotracheal tubes (17.6 vs. 29.3 vs. 20.2 in conventional polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube; 14.6 vs. 27.4 vs. 19.9 in WRS tube; sec). There were no significant (p < 0.05) differences between PVC and WRS tubes for each intubation technique. The intubation time to reach 100% cumulative success rate was also shorter in IGI (p < 0.017) than that in IBRI and MCL in both PVC and WRS tubes. Conclusions IGI was an equally successful and faster technique compared with IBRI or MCL regardless of the use of PVC or WRS tube. IGI might be an appropriate technique for emergent intubation by experienced intubators during chest compressions.

Comparison of three types of intubation stylets for tracheal intubation with a McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope by novice intubators in simulated cervical immobilisation: A randomised crossover manikin study

Introduction: Tracheal intubation using video laryngoscopes has been a better approach for trauma patients requiring cervical immobilisation. The aim of this study was to compare the time to successful intubation by novice intubators using three types of intubation stylets with the new McGrath MAC video laryngoscope in a manikin model. Methods: This was a randomised crossover manikin study. The participants performed tracheal intubations using three intubation stylets (arcuate shape malleable stylet, McGrath MAC-shaped malleable stylet and McGrath MAC-shaped rigid stylet) in a difficult airway model with cervical immobilisation. The order of the stylets was randomised. The primary outcome was the time to successful intubation. The secondary outcomes were the overall success rates, incidence of dental trauma and ease of intubation. All intubation attempts were assessed by trained assistants. The data were analysed using a multilevel model followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: A total of 68 nurses participated in this study. The time to successful intubation of the McGrath MAC-shaped malleable stylet was significantly shorter than that of the arcuate shape malleable stylet (24.5 (18.0–51.0) s vs 31.5 (21.0–89.0) s, p = 0.005). The overall success rate of the McGrath MAC-shaped malleable stylet was also higher than that of the arcuate shape malleable stylet ( p = 0.047). The participants indicated that intubation was easier using the McGrath MAC-shaped malleable stylet compared with the other stylets. Conclusion: The McGrath MAC-shaped malleable stylet, when used by novice intubators, may be an optimal stylet shape for tracheal intubation using the McGrath MAC in cervical immobilisation.

Direct and indirect low skill fibre-optic intubation: A randomised crossover manikin study of six supraglottic airway devices.

Background and Aims:Fibre-optic intubation (FOI) through supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is useful in the management of the difficult airway. We compared two methods of FOI through seven SADs in a randomised crossover manikin study to assess each device's performance and discuss implications on SAD selection.Methods:Thirty anaesthetsiologists, 15 seniors and 15 juniors, each performed low skill FOI (LSFOI) with seven SADs using both 'direct' and 'indirect' methods. The order of method and device used were randomised. The primary end point was success rate of intubation; secondary end points were time taken for intubation, incidence of difficulties with direct and indirect LSFOI and operator device preference. Statistical analysis was with univariable analysis and comparison of proportions.Results:Data from six devices were analysed due to a protocol breach with one SAD. There was no difference in intubation success rate across all SADs and intubation methods. Intubation time was significantly shorter in AmbuAuragain than other SADs and shorter with the direct method of LSFOI than the indirect method (mean difference of 6.9 s, P = 0.027). Ambu Auragain had the least SAD and bronchoscope-related difficulties. Seniors had significantly shorter mean intubation times than juniors by 11.6 s (P = 0.0392). The most preferred SAD for both methods was AmbuAuragain.Conclusion:Low skill FOI consistently achieves a high intubation success rate regardless of experience, choice of method, or SAD used. SAD design features may significantly affect the performance of low skill FOI.

Comparison of Xenon with LED illuminant in difficult and inhalation injury airway scenario: A randomized crossover manikin study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a Xenon halogen with a light-emitting diode (LED) laryngoscope light handle in a difficult airway scenario, as well as in an inhalation injury airway scenario that combines a difficult airway and a limited view. MethodsWe recruited forty-two anesthetists into a randomized crossover trial. Each performed tracheal intubation (TI) with a Xenon halogen and a LED light handle in the two manikin scenarios. The primary endpoint was the “time to intubate”. Other endpoints were the “time to vocal cords”, the “time to ventilate”, the rate of successful intubation, the number of intubation attempts, the Cormack-Lehane score, the number of optimization maneuvers, the number of audible dental click sounds indicating dental damage and subjective impressions. ResultsIn the difficult airway scenario, no significant differences in the recorded intubation times were observed. In the inhalation injury airway scenario, the intubation times were significantly shorter using the LED light handle. Regarding the subjective values, the LED illuminant enabled a significant better view and illumination of the oropharyngeal space and the vocal cords, in both manikin scenarios. ConclusionThe LED laryngoscope light handle did not affect the recorded intubation times in the simulated difficult airway scenario, but provided significant advantages in the inhalation injury airway scenario that combines a difficult airway with a limited view caused by a sooted pharynx. We therefore hypothesize, that the LED illuminant might be beneficial in the airway management of burn patients with severe inhalation injury.

Manual laryngeal fixation facilitates tracheal intubation during chest compression: A randomized crossover manikin study

PurposeWe compared the effectiveness of external manual laryngeal fixation (MLF) for tracheal intubation during chest compression using three laryngoscopes, the Macintosh laryngoscope (McL), McGRATH® MAC (McGRGTH), and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope® (AWS) on an adult manikin. MethodsSixteen novice doctors and 15 experienced anesthesiologists performed tracheal intubation during chest compression on an adult manikin using the McL, McGRATH, and AWS with or without MLF. Tracheal intubation time and intubation success rate were measured. ResultsIn the AWS trial, all novice and experienced doctors successfully secured the airway with or without MLF during chest compression. In McL and McGRATH trials, MLF significantly improved the rate of successful intubation during chest compression compared to without MLF for novice doctors. While intubation time did not significantly differ with or without MLF in the AWS trial, MLF significantly shortened intubation time in McL and McGRATH trials for both novice and experienced doctors. ConclusionThese findings suggest that MLF facilitates tracheal intubation with the McL and McGRATH during chest compression.

Effect of bed width on the quality of compressions in simulated resuscitation: a randomized crossover manikin study

ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of bed width on the quality of chest compressions during simulated in-hospital resuscitation. MethodsEach candidate performed two 2-minute cycles of compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation on an adult manikin placed on either an emergency stretcher (narrow bed) or a standard hospital bed (wide bed) in random order at 1 day intervals. We conducted subjective assessments of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and rescuer fatigue at the end of each session, using surveys. ResultsThere were no significant differences between narrow and wide bed sessions in either mean depth or the percentage of compressions with adequate depth (P=.56 and .58, respectively). The mean rate of compressions and the percentage of compressions with adequate rate were also similar between sessions (P=.24 and .27, respectively). However, the percentage of correct hand position and complete chest recoil was significantly higher in the narrow bed session than in the wide bed session (P=.02 and .02, respectively). In addition, survey results showed that rescuers felt more comfortable and less exhausted in the narrow bed session compared with the wide bed session (P<.001 and < .001). ConclusionsWhen rescuers performed chest compressions on an emergency stretcher, chest compression quality increased, and the fatigue of rescuers decreased compared with a standard hospital bed. Therefore, we propose a narrow bed for critically ill inpatients with high risk of cardiac arrest.

Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study.

This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

Comparison of the GlideScope® with the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Mechanical Chest Compression: A Randomised Crossover Manikin Study

Background The GlideScope® (GS) has been shown to improve the first-attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation during continuous mechanical chest compressions compared with the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (ML) in inexperienced hands. Yet, its value for operators with experience of emergency airway management has remained uncertain. We set out to compare their performance in the hands of experienced operators in a manikin receiving continuous mechanical chest compressions delivered by LUCAS®. Method This was a randomised crossover study. Thirty-five emergency physicians and intensivists performed intubation using GS and ML in 3 different scenarios: (1) normal airway without chest compressions; (2) normal airway with uninterrupted mechanical chest compressions; and (3) normal airway with cervical spine (C-spine) immobilisation and uninterrupted mechanical chest compressions. The sequence of scenarios and devices used were randomised. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of intubation. Other data including demographics, the time required for successful intubation, complications during intubation, the visual analog scale of perceived difficulty of intubation and the preference on devices in each scenario were also collected and analyzed. Results In scenario 1, the first-attempt success rate with both laryngoscopes was 100%. In scenario 2, there was a higher first-attempt success rate with ML but it was not statistically significant (GS 97.14% vs ML 100%, p=1.00). In scenario 3, one participant failed to intubate in the first attempt with each of the laryngoscopes (GS 97.14% vs ML 97.14%, p=0.754). More dental compression was noted with GS but the difference was not statistically significant (GS 42.86% vs ML 22.86%, p=0.126). Overall, the median time for intubation with GS was significantly longer in all 3 scenarios (Scenario 1: GS 18.5s; interquartile range [IQR] 13.8 -22.2s vs ML 11.2s, IQR 9.5-14.2s, p&lt;0.001; Scenario 2: GS 18.7s, IQR 13.1-25.2s vs ML 13.4s, 10.3-15.8s, p&lt;0.001; Scenario 3: GS 20.8s, IQR 16.5-29.2s vs ML 14.0s, IQR 10.5-18.0s, p&lt;0.001). More participants preferred GS in scenario 3, while ML remained the device of choice in the other two scenarios. Conclusion: GS is not superior to ML in terms of the first-attempt success rate of intubation and it takes significantly longer to intubate for experienced operator. Yet more participants prefer its use when the C-spine motion is limited. Further studies are warranted to explore its role in trauma resuscitation. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2016;23:159-167)

Up-down hand position switch may delay the fatigue of non-dominant hand position rescuers and improve chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover manikin study.

Previous studies have shown improved external chest compression (ECC) quality and delayed rescuer fatigue when the dominant hand (DH) was in contact with the sternum. However, many rescuers prefer placing the non-dominant hand (NH) in contact with the sternum during ECC. We aimed to investigate the effects of up-down hand position switch on the quality of ECC and the fatigue of rescuers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After completion of a review of the standard adult basic life support (BLS) course, every candidate performed 10 cycles of single adult CPR twice on an adult manikin with either a constant hand position (CH) or a switched hand position (SH) in random order at 7-day intervals. The rescuers’ general characteristics, hand positions, physiological signs, fatigue appearance and ECC qualities were recorded. Our results showed no significant differences in chest compression quality for the DH position rescuers between the CH and SH sessions (p>0.05, resp.). And also no significant differences were found for Borg score (p = 0.437) or cycle number (p = 0.127) of fatigue appearance after chest compressions between the two sessions. However, for NH position rescuers, the appearance of fatigue was delayed (p = 0.046), with a lower Borg score in the SH session (12.67 ± 2.03) compared to the CH session (13.33 ± 1.95) (p = 0.011). Moreover, the compression depth was significantly greater in the SH session (39.3 ± 7.2 mm) compared to the CH session (36.3 ± 8.1 mm) (p = 0.015). Our data suggest that the up-down hand position switch during CPR may delay the fatigue of non-dominant hand position rescuers and improve the quality of chest compressions.

Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial

IntroductionThe main cause of cardiac arrest in pediatric patients is respiratory failure. ObjectiveTo test the ability of paramedics to intubate the trachea of a child by means of the standard Macintosh [MAC] laryngoscope vs the Clarus Leviatan fiberoptic stylet (FPS) during 3-airway scenarios. MethodsThis was a randomized crossover manikin study involving 89 paramedics. The participants performed tracheal intubations using the MAC laryngoscope and the Clarus Leviatan FPS in 3 pediatric airway scenarios: scenario A, normal airway without chest compression (CC); scenario B, normal airway with CC; and scenario C, difficult airway with CC. ResultsA total of 89 paramedics participated in this study. In scenario A, the FPS maintained a better success rate at first attempt (97.8% vs 88.9%; P=.73) and time required to intubate (17 [interquartile range, 15-21) seconds vs 18 [interquartile range, 16-22] seconds; P=.67) when compared with MAC. In scenarios B and C, the results with FPS were significantly better than those with MAC (P<.05) for all analyzed variables. ConclusionsThis study suggested that the FPS could be used as an option for airway management even for paramedics with little experience. Future studies should explore the efficacy of FPS in pediatric clinical emergency settings.

Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians? A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians? A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study