Partial necrosis of skin flaps following plastic and reconstructive surgeries is one of the major problems in these medical interventions. This study was conducted to evaluate the beneficial effects of topiramate an anti-epileptic agent on ischemic random skin flaps. Twenty-four Wistar rats were provided and randomly divided into four experimental groups (control group and low-, intermediate- and high-dose treatment groups). A rat random-pattern skin flap model was performed in all groups, and animals in the low-, intermediate- and high-dose experimental groups were administered topiramate intraperitoneally at doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively, 1 h before raising the flap and once daily for 7 consecutive days after the initial surgical procedure. Control rats received vehicle according to the same schedule. On postoperative day 7 the flap necrotic area was measured, and tissue samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. Furthermore, the oxidative stress in flap tissue was assessed by measuring the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) level and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA). Treating animals with 50 and 100 mg/kg topiramate significantly decreased the necrotic flap areas as compared to the control group. Histological studies demonstrated that in intermediate and high dose topiramate groups the inflammatory cell numbers were attenuated and microvessel development were markedly increased. Furthermore, the MDA contents were significantly reduced and GSH levels were significantly increased in these groups as compared to the control group. However, the SOD activity was increased significantly only in high-dose group as compared to the control group. These findings indicated that topiramate in doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg increases random skin flap survival. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Read full abstract