Radiotherapy For Localized Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial.

The usefulness of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer has been extensively reported, but there are limited studies on proton beam therapy (PBT) using similar hypofractionation schedules. The aim of this prospective phase II study is to confirm the safety of a shortened PBT course using 70Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 28 fractions. From May 2013 to June 2015, 102 men with localized prostate cancer were enrolled. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered according to risk classification. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Of the 100 patients ultimately evaluated, 15 were classified as low risk, 43 as intermediate risk, and 42 as high risk. The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 96months (range: 60-119months). The 5-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were 1% (95% CI: 0.1-6.9) and 4% (95% CI: 1.5-10.3), respectively; no grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were observed. The current study revealed a low incidence of late adverse events in prostate cancer patients treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT of 70Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions, indicating the safety of this schedule.

Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: Efficacy and late urinary toxicity according to transurethral resection of the prostate history

Background and purposeExtreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch–Prentice method. ResultsAmong the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61–81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3–14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73–89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9–28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05–8.86; P = 0.04). ConclusionExtreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.

Stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer – Acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in the prospective, multicenter SMILE phase II trial

BackgroundDue to superior image quality and daily adaptive planning, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) has the potential to further widen the therapeutic window in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. This study reports on acute toxicity rates and patient-reported outcomes after MR-guided adaptive ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer within the prospective, multicenter phase II SMILE trial. Materials and methodsA total of 69 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent MRgSBRT with daily online plan adaptation. Inclusion criteria comprised a tumor stage ≤ T3a, serum PSA value ≤ 20 ng/ml, ISUP Grade group ≤ 4. A dose of 37.5 Gy was prescribed to the PTV in five fractions on alternating days with an optional simultaneous boost of 40 Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by multiparametric MRI. Acute genitourinary (GU-) and gastrointestinal (GI-) toxicity, as defined by CTCAE v. 5.0 and RTOG as well as patient-reported outcomes according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and -PR25 scores were analyzed at completion of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy and compared to baseline symptoms. ResultsThere were no toxicity-related treatment discontinuations. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no grade 3 + toxicities were reported according to CTCAE. Up until the 12-week visit, in total 16 patients (23 %) experienced a grade 2 GU or GI toxicity. Toxicity rates peaked at the end of radiation therapy and subsided within the 12-week follow-up period. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no residual grade 2 GU toxicities were reported and 1 patient (1 %) had residual grade 2 enteritic symptoms. With exception to a significant improvement in the emotional functioning score following MRgSBRT, no clinically meaningful changes in the global health status nor in relevant subscores were reported. ConclusionDaily online-adaptive MRgSBRT for localized prostate cancer resulted in an excellent overall toxicity profile without any major negative impact on quality of life.

Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: amulticenter analysis evaluating tumor control and late toxicity after brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in 1293 patients.

Comparing oncological outcomes and toxicity after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer using HDR- or LDR-mono-brachytherapy (BT), or conventionally (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HF) external beam radiotherapy. Retrospectively, patients with low- (LR) or favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer treated between 03/2000 and 09/2022 in two centers were included. Treatment was performed using either CF with total doses between 74and 78 Gy, HF with 2.4-2.6 Gy per fraction in 30fractions, or LDR- or HDR-BT. Biochemical control (BC) according to the Phoenix criteria, and late gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC criteria were assessed. We identified 1293 patients, 697 with LR and 596 with IR prostate cancer. Of these, 470, 182, 480, and 161 were treated with CF, HF, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT, respectively. For BC, we did not find asignificant difference between treatments in LR and IR (p = 0.31 and 0.72). The 5‑year BC for LR was between 93and 95% for all treatment types. For IR, BC was between 88% in the CF and 94% in the HF group. For CF and HF, maximum GI and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 was between 22and 27%. For LDR-BT, we observed 67% grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. Maximum GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 9%. For HDR-BT, we observed 1% GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity and 19% GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity. All types of therapy were effective and well received. HDR-BT caused the least late toxicities, especially GI.

ONE SHOT - single shot radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: 18-month results of a single arm, multicenter phase I/II trial

PurposeTo assess in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study the early safety and efficacy profile of single fraction urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for men with localized prostate cancer. Material and methodsPatients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without significant tumor in the transitional zone were recruited. A single-fraction of 19 Gy was delivered to the prostate, with 17 Gy dose-reduction to the urethra. Intrafraction motion was monitored using intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders with intra-fraction correction of displacements exceeding 3 mm. Genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicity during the first 18 months were evaluated using the CTCAE v4.0 grading scale. Quality of life was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index composite 26 score, and the International Index of Erectile Function score. ResultsAmong the 45 patients recruited in 5 centers between 2017 and 2022, 43 received the single fraction without protocol deviations, and 34 had a minimal follow-up of 18 months. The worst GU toxicity was observed at day-5 after SBRT (42.5 % and 20 % with grade 1 and 2, respectively), returning to baseline at week-12 and month-6 (<3% with grade 2), with a 12 % grade 2 flare at month 18. Gl toxicity was mild in the acute phase, with no grade ≥ 2 events (12 % grade 1 at month 6). Grade-3 proctitis was observed in one patient at month 12, with < 3 % grade 2 toxicity at month 18. Mean GU and GI bother scores showed a decline at day 5, a complete recovery at month 6, and a flare between month 12 and 18. Mean PSA dropped from 6.2 ng/ml to 1.2 ng/ml at month 18 and 0.7 ng/ml at month 24. After a median follow-up time of 26 months, 3 biochemical failures (7 %) were observed at month 17, 21 and 30. ConclusionsIn this multicenter phase I/II trial, we demonstrated that a 19 Gy single-fraction urethra-sparing SBRT is feasible and associated with an acceptable toxicity rate, mostly returning to the baseline at week-12 and with a symptoms flare between months 12 and 18. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the potential long-term adverse effects and the disease control efficacy.

Image-guided moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a multicentric retrospective study (IPOPROMISE)

BackgroundModerate hypofractionated radiotherapy is a treatment option for the cure of localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients based on the results of randomized prospective trials, but there is a clinical concern about the relatively short length of follow-up, and real-world results on outcome and toxicity based on cutting-edge techniques are lacking. The objective of this study is to present the long-term results of a large multicentric series.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 1325 PCa patients treated with daily volumetric image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2007 and 2020 in 16 Centers. For survival endpoints, we used Kaplan–Meier survival curves and fitted univariate and multivariable Cox’s proportional hazards regression models to study the association between the clinical variables and each survival type.ResultsAt the end of the follow-up, 11 patients died from PCa. The 15-year values of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS) were 98.5% (95%CI 97.3–99.6%) and 85.5% (95%CI 81.9–89.4%), respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that baseline PSA, Gleason score, and the use of androgen deprivation therapy were significant variables for all the outcomes. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities of grade ≥ 2 were 7.0% and 16.98%, respectively. The 15-year late grade ≥ 2 GI and GU toxicities were 5% (95%CI 4–6%) and 6% (95%CI 4–8%), respectively.ConclusionReal-world long-term results of this multicentric study on cutting-edge techniques for the cure of localized PCa demonstrated an excellent biochemical-free survival rate of 85.5% at 15 years, and very low rates of ≥ G3 late GU and GI toxicity (1.6% and 0.9% respectively), strengthening the results of the available published trials.

Dosimetric benefit of online treatment plan adaptation in stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Apart from superior soft tissue contrast, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers the chance for daily online plan adaptation. This study reports on the comparison of dose parameters before and after online plan adaptation in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. 32 consecutive patients treated with ultrahypofractionated SBRT for localized prostate cancer within the prospective SMILE trial underwent a planning process for MR-guided radiotherapy with 37.5 Gy applied in 5 fractions. A base plan, derived from MRI simulation at an MRIdian Linac, was registered to daily MRI scans (predicted plan). Following target and OAR recontouring, the plan was reoptimized based on the daily anatomy (adapted plan). CTV and PTV coverage and doses at OAR were compared between predicted and adapted plans using linear mixed regression models. In 152 out of 160 fractions (95%), an adapted radiation plan was delivered. Mean CTV and PTV coverage increased by 1.4% and 4.5% after adaptation. 18% vs. 95% of the plans had a PTV coverage ≥95% before and after online adaptation, respectively. 78% vs. 100% of the plans had a CTV coverage ≥98% before and after online adaptation, respectively. The D0.2cc for both bladder and rectum were <38.5 Gy in 93% vs. 100% before and after online adaptation. The constraint at the urethra with a dose of <37.5 Gy was achieved in 59% vs. 93% before and after online adaptation. Online adaptive plan adaptation improves target volume coverage and reduces doses to OAR in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. Online plan adaptation could potentially further reduce acute and long-term side effects and improve local failure rates in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer.

(016) Sexual Health Toxicity Following MRI-Guided versus CT-guided Prostate SBRT

Abstract Introduction Sexual health toxicities remain an under-reported but important health outcome for patients undergoing radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. With the increasing adoption of higher daily doses of radiation over shorter timeframes delivered using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the precision of radiation delivery remains an important factor that can reduce patient toxicity. MRI-guided SBRT (MRgRT) allows for improved image quality, treatment gating, and planning target volume margin reduction, offering improved radiation precision, which may translate to reduced treatment-related toxicity as compared to traditional CT-guided SBRT (CTgRT). Objective We sought to evaluate the effect of MRI-guidance on sexual health toxicity in patients following prostate SBRT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of patients enrolled on a phase III single-center randomized trial (MIRAGE: NCT04384770). The trial overall seeks to study the relative benefit of MRI vs CT guided SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) in patients with localized prostate cancer. Right and left neurovascular bundles (NVBs) and internal pudendal arteries (IPAs) were contoured on treatment planning images. Dosimetric parameters for these structures (Dmax, Dmin, Dmean, and V20Gy) were collected. Patient-reported sexual function outcomes (SHIM and EPIC-26 surveys) were also collected prior to treatment and at 1, 3, and 12 months following treatment. A clinically relevant decrement was defined as a ≥24 point decrease in the EPIC-26 sexual domain scores and a ≥9 point decrease on SHIM surveys. Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were used to evaluate for statistical significance. Results 152 patients received either MRgRT (n = 77) or CTgRT (n = 75). MRgRT resulted in a significant improvement in the volume receiving 20 Gy or less of radiation (V20Gy) in the left NVB (7.3cc vs 10.9cc, p = 4.4x10-8), right NVB (7.0cc vs 10.7cc, p = 2.8x10-7), and right IPA (0.42cc vs 1.35cc, p = 0.049), and trended towards significance for the left IPA (0.3cc vs 1.1cc, p = 0.066). Only 48 patients were not given hormonal therapy with radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences in clinically relevant decrements in patient-reported SHIM or EPIC scores were seen between MRgRT and CTgRT in these patients. No clear association between acute or chronic (12-months post-RT) sexual health toxicity and radiation exposure to the NVBs or IPAs was identified. Conclusions Patients treated with MRgRT had decreased radiation exposure to the bilateral NVBs and IPAs compared to patients treated with CTgRT. These data highlight the dosimetric benefits of MRgRT with regard to sexually relevant organs at risk. Power to detect associations between dosimetry and patient-reported sexual health outcomes will increase as the data matures and more patients have recovered testosterone after use of hormonal therapy. Future work will assess the impact on MRI-guided vs CT-guided radiation on sexual health outcomes at later time points. Disclosure No.

Relugolix versus leuprolide in combination with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer (REVELUTION trial): An initial analysis of patient treatment preferences and quality of life.

301 Background: Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, has superior testosterone suppression and may lower cardiovascular (CV) toxicity compared with more commonly used injectable GnRH agonists, such as leuprolide. The Relugolix Versus Leuprolide Trial (REVELUTION, NCT 05320406) is an ongoing, investigator-initiated, randomized trial comparing radiotherapy (XRT) plus relugolix versus XRT plus leuprolide for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Primary endpoint is change in coronary plaque on cardiac computed tomography from baseline to 12 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Herein, we report patient-specific treatment preferences prior to randomization and acute treatment-associated toxicity. Methods: Men with non-metastatic intact or biochemically recurrent PCa pursuing pelvic XRT (1.8-2.5 Gy per fraction) with ≥ 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to leuprolide (IM/SC 45 mg q6mo) or relugolix (PO 360 mg day 1, 120 mg daily thereafter). Prior to randomization, each patient completed an ADT preference questionnaire after reviewing an education brochure describing both drugs’ administration, testosterone kinetics, and common toxicities. PROs were assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-CP) at baseline and 3-/6-months after XRT initiation, with higher scores indicating more severe toxicity. Scores were compared using linear mixed-effects models accounting for within-subject correlations. Results: Between 06/2022 and 07/2023, 65 men were randomized (34 leuprolide, 31 relugolix). Median follow-up was 5 months (IQR 4-8). Prior to randomization, 61 (94%) preferred relugolix over leuprolide, due to faster testosterone recovery (n=36, 59%), lower CV risk (n=23, 38%), or oral administration (n=2, 3%); the four patients who preferred leuprolide all had compliance concerns with a daily oral pill. Compared with XRT+leuprolide, XRT+relugolix was associated with less impact on IPSS urinary score (mean difference [MD] -3.68, p=0.04). There was no difference in EPIC-CP incontinence (MD +0.07, p=0.91), bowel (MD +0.39, p=0.44), sexual (MD -0.74, p=0.43), or vitality (MD +0.17, p=0.80). Conclusions: In this trial of men with localized PCa treated with XRT plus ADT, most preferred relugolix over leuprolide. Relugolix, compared with leuprolide, mitigated acute urinary toxicity from XRT, perhaps due to superior castration resulting in greater prostate gland downsizing and less obstructive uropathy. Longer-term follow up is ongoing, and primary CV toxicity endpoint is expected to be complete in 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05320406 .

Six-year outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: Apropensity score-matched analysis.

Although robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are the leading respective techniques of prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, almost no study has directly compared their outcomes; none have compared mortality outcomes. We compared 6‑year outcomes of RARP (n = 500) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, arotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy, n = 360) in patients with cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer. We assessed oncological outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), radiological recurrence-free survival (rRFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), using propensity score matching (PSM). We also assessed treatment-related complication outcomes of prostatectomy and radiotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 79months (> 6years). PSM generated amatched cohort of 260 patients (130 per treatment group). In the matched cohort, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent results for OS, CSS, and rRFS: both achieved excellent 6‑year outcomes for OS (> 96%), CSS (> 98%), and rRFS (> 91%). VMAT had significantly longer bRFS than RARP, albeit based on different definitions of biochemical recurrence. Regarding complication outcomes, patients who underwent RARP had minimal (2.6%) severe perioperative complications and achieved excellent continence recovery (91.6and 68.8% of the patients achieved ≤ 1pad/day and pad-free, respectively). Patients who underwent VMAT had an acceptable rate (20.0%) of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary complications and avery low rate (4.4%) of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal complications. On the basis of PSM after a6-year follow-up, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent and excellent oncological outcomes, as well as acceptable complication profiles.

Biochemical outcomes following radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: comparative outcomes to national published data from the CHHiP trial

Biochemical outcomes following radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: comparative outcomes to national published data from the CHHiP trial

The march toward single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-Quo Vadimus?

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for localized prostate cancer. There is increasing interest to reduce the number of fractions for prostate SBRT. We provide a narrative review and summary of prospective trials of different fractionation schedules for prostate SBRT, focusing on efficacy, toxicities, and quality of life outcomes. There are two randomized phase 3 trials comparing standard external beam radiotherapy with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. HYPO-RT-PC compared 78Gy in 39 fractions vs 42.7Gy in 7 fractions (3D-CRT or IMRT) showing non-inferiority in 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and equivalent tolerability. PACE-B trial compared 78Gy in 39-fraction or 62Gy in 20-fraction vs 36.25Gy in 5-fraction prostate SBRT, with no significant differences in toxicity outcomes at 2years. Five-year efficacy data for PACE-B are expected in 2024. Five-fraction prostate SBRT is currently the most common and well-established fractionation schedule with multiple prospective phase 2 trials published to date. There is more limited data on 1-4 fraction prostate SBRT. All fractionation schedules had acceptable toxicity outcomes. Experience from a high-dose-rate brachytherapy randomized trial showed inferior efficacy with single-fraction compared to two-fraction brachytherapy. Hence, caution should be applied in adopting single-fraction prostate SBRT. Two-fraction SBRT is likely the shortest fractionation schedule that maintains the therapeutic ratio. Several randomized trials currently recruiting will likely provide us with more definite answers about whether two-fraction prostate SBRT should become a standard-of-care option. Enrollment of eligible patients into these trials should be encouraged.

P068 - Serum levels of vitamin E (Vit E) in patients with proctitis after radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

P068 - Serum levels of vitamin E (Vit E) in patients with proctitis after radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Assessing the Impact of Adding First Generation Non-Steroidal Anti-Androgens (NSAA) to LHRH Agonists (LHRHa) in Men Receiving Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Randomized clinical trials consistently demonstrate that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to prostate radiation therapy improves overall survival (OS). However, there is substantial heterogeneity regarding the type of ADT: LHRHa alone, first generation NSAA alone (e.g., bicalutamide) or combination androgen blockade (CAB) with NSAA and LHRHa. There are no published randomized trials in localized disease that specifically compare the efficacy of NSAA to LHRHa, nor the utility of CAB over monotherapy ADT. We herein performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the impact of NSAA in relation to LHRHa in men receiving radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed to identify clinical trials of patients with localized prostate cancer for which ADT duration was the primary randomization variable. Both definitive and salvage radiation trials were included. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from data extracted from published survival curves. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare OS by ADT regimens. We defined NSAA toxicity as early discontinuation of any ADT agent due to side effects given the inconsistent reporting of specific related toxicity. A meta-regression was performed to assess association with NSAA toxicity, adjusted for study year, patient age, T stage, Gleason score and total ADT duration. NSAA duration was assessed as a continuous variable. Of the 11 trials (8,169 patients) with OS data, the median duration of any ADT was 3 months (range 0-36 months) and the median duration of NSAA specifically was 3.5 months (range 0-24 months). There was no significant difference in OS between those treated with LHRHa (n = 369) vs. CAB (n = 4,792; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.78-1.55). Among those receiving CAB, increased NSAA duration did not improve OS (versus 0 months; 1-6 months HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.94-2.13; 7-12 months HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.87-2.34) when controlling for total ADT duration. Of the 19 trials (15,067 patients) with toxicity data, patients on NSAA (n = 503) appeared more likely to discontinue treatment early compared to those receiving LHRHa (n = 902), though this was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 4.20, 95% CI 0.16-109.19). A longer duration of NSAA did not adversely affect ADT compliance. Patients were more likely to discontinue ADT prematurely, regardless of type, if the planned duration was longer (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07-1.09). We did not detect an overall survival benefit to adding NSAA to LHRHa, and NSAA appeared less well tolerated than LHRHa in men receiving radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. These data suggest that providers should consider LHRHa without the addition of a NSAA as optimal when clinically appropriate.

Individual Patient Data Analysis of 17 Randomized Trials vs. Real-World Data for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy.

Prior work has demonstrated poor correlation between the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWD). However, patients enrolled in RCTs are often considered to poorly represent the real-world population. Herein, we utilize multiple large data repositories to determine differences in baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes between patients enrolled in RCTs and RWD that received radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Meta-Analysis of Randomized trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium was leveraged, and 17 phase III randomized trials were included. RWD were accessed through the Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) cohort, a cohort that is comprised of >60 centers across the United States and Europe. Additionally, RWD was assessed via the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MARCAP and STAR-CAP both contain outcomes for distant metastasis (DM), metastasis-free survival (MFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS). SEER only contains PCSM and OS. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted, balancing for age, PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and treatment year in the three cohorts. Cox and Fine-Gray regression models were used to compare disease outcomes between RCTs vs. RWD. Data from 10,666 patients from RCTs, 6,530 patients in STAR-CAP, and 117,586 patients in SEER were included. SEER patients were slightly younger (p<0.001, median age 68 (IQR 62-73) than those in RCTs (70, IQR 65-74) and in STAR-CAP (70, IQR 64-74). 10-year OS in RCTs was 65.4%, STAR-CAP 70.2%, SEER 64.1%. OS was superior in STAR-CAP (RCTs as reference; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, p<0.0001), but there was no significant difference between SEER and RCTs (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-1.02, p = 0.22). 10-year PCSM cumulative incidence was 7.4% in RCTs, 8.1% in STAR-CAP, and 11.0% in SEER. There was no significant difference in PCSM between STAR-CAP RWD and RCTs (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.01, p = 0.08), whereas PCSM was worse in SEER than RCTs (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.21-1.55, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in DM between STAR-CAP RWD and RCTs (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.04, p = 0.2). While baseline differences exist in patients enrolled on localized prostate cancer RCTs and real-world datasets, there were small if any significant relative differences in oncologic outcomes. This provides reassurance that RCT results are generally applicable to patients in routine practice.

Assessment of rectal toxicities after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: experience of the Akanda Cancer Institute in Gabon.

The purpose was to evaluate the incidence of acute and late rectal toxicities and their correlation with the clinical and dosimetric parameters of patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer at the Akanda Cancer Institute, Gabon. Between 2013 and 2021, a cohort of 46 patients with clinically localized stage cT1c-T4 prostate cancer was treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) at the national cancer institute with doses ranging from 66 to 80 Gy. Post-radiation gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were classified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE v4.0. In our study, 17.4% (8/46) developed acute GI. Grades 1 and 3 acute GI complications were seen in 13.0% (6/46) and 4.3% (2/46), respectively. No patient developed acute grade 2 or grade higher than 3 complications. Late GI side effects were limited. The median time to the development of late GI Grade ≥ 1 toxicities was 12 months (range: 9-19 months). 10.9% (5/46) had experience late GI. Among them, grade 1 and 2 were seen in 6.5% (3/46), and 4.3% (2/46), respectively. There was no grade 3 or higher complications. Statistically, we did not find any correlation between the presence of rectal toxicity and clinical factors or the presence of comorbidity. On the dosimetric level, the Mann-Whitney statistical test found a correlation between the presence of late GI toxicity and rectal volume irradiated at the prescribed dose (p = 0.02). Despite the high radiation doses involved, our results showed an acceptable complication rate.

Treatment outcomes of our patients with prostate cancer who underwent postoperative radiotherapy

Aims: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. Surgery, radiotherapy or active surveillance are the treatment options. Treatment is decided according to risk group of the patient. Postoperative radiotherapy is delivered in selected patients to increase the local control rates. The aim of this study is to report the treatment results of patients who received postoperative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Methods: This retrosepctive study included 78 prostate cancer patients who received postoperative radiotherapy between 2011 and 2023. All patients except who had pathologically positive lymph nodes were included into the study. Overall survival, progression free survival, and associated pathological parameters were evaluated by using IBM SPSS programme version 20. Results: The mean follow-up time was 66.7 (IQR 25-75:41,6-89,6) months. Five and 10-year overall survival rates were 93%, and 67.3% respectively; (median (95% CI); NR (not reach): while 5 and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 90.3%, and 50.4, respectively; (median (95% CI); 135.3± (105.9-165.7). Postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) and pre-RT PSA values, and the effects of these parameters on progression-free survival was analyzed, median progression-free survival was higher in patients with postoperative PSA values ? 0.185 (135.6±24.4 vs 113.3±6.4, p:0.001). Five and 10 year overall survival and progression-free survival rates of patients with a high gleason score who underwent postoperative radiotherapy was observed lower than the others (86.9% and 46.3%, p=0.006; 86.9% and 33.8%, p=0.009 respectively). Conclusion: Postoperative radiotherapy is generated best results in progression free survival and overall survival in patients with low pre-rt psa and high gleason score prostate cancer cases

Replicating the timing of androgen deprivation therapy randomized trial (TROG 03.06 and VCOG PR 01-03 [TOAD]) for recurrent prostate cancer using real-world observational data.

e17090 Background: The landmark TOAD trial (Lancet Oncol 2016) demonstrated an overall survival benefit for immediate compared to delayed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for patients with recurrent prostate cancer or unsuitable for curative treatment. However, the extent to which TOAD trial results can be replicated in real-world population-based observational data is unknown. For these reasons, we used TOAD trial data and criteria to define a similar retrospective cohort of men with rising PSA after definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer to compare immediate versus delayed ADT for recurrent non-metastatic disease. Methods: We used two data sources to conduct this study: 1) TOAD trial data, and 2) national electronic health record, cancer registry, administrative, pharmacy, and laboratory data for men treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer and laboratory confirmed biochemical recurrence (BCR) between 2005- 2015 in the Veterans Health Administration. We defined BCR according to guidelines and used National Death Index data through 2019 for survival outcomes. We designated randomization to the ‘immediate’ and ‘delayed’ arms for men receiving ADT within (immediate) or after (delayed) 2 years of BCR in the observational data. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age, PSA at BCR, comorbidities, and Gleason score, stratified by prior ADT exposure, to compare survival outcomes for immediate versus delayed ADT. Results: We identified 9,866 men with BCR after radical prostatectomy, 3,431 after radiotherapy alone, and 2,703 after radiotherapy and adjuvant ADT. The mean age at randomization for the TOAD cohort was older (74.8 vs. 75.9 years, delayed vs. immediate) compared to our observational cohort (68.1 vs. 67.0 years, delayed vs. immediate). In unadjusted survival analyses, we found both overall and prostate cancer-specific survival were higher among patients with delayed ADT (log-rank p-value &lt; 0.001 for both). Our multivariable survival models among men with and without prior ADT exposure also demonstrated survival benefit associated with delayed ADT (prior ADT exposure, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7, 3.0, no prior ADT exposure 2.6, 95% CI 2.4, 2.8). Conclusions: The benefit of immediate ADT administration compared to delayed as reported within the TOAD study was not found in a comparable observational cohort of men with non-metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. Even after multivariable adjustment, we found clear association of delayed ADT administration with improved survival outcomes suggesting selection bias and unobserved confounding, or that delayed ADT may be warranted for selected patient populations necessitating further investigation. Source of Funding: NCI R01 CA242559.

Ten-year outcomes of hypofractionated (45 Gy in 9 fractions) intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

e17100 Background: We reported 10-year outcomes of localized prostate cancers treated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 9 consecutive fractions. Methods: From October 2011 to April 2017, thirty patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective trial. The median age of the patients was 72.5 years. According to NCCN recurrence risk criteria, eight patients were at low risk group, 17 at intermediate risk group, 5 at high risk group. All patients were treated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of 45 Gy in 9 consecutive fractions to their prostate with or without seminal vesicles. Before radiotherapy, three gold fiducials were implanted into the prostate. In order to reduce the rectal high dose irradiation volume , an inflated rectal balloon was placed in the rectum at simulation and every treatment and patients were treated with comfortable full bladder. Static Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIMRT) was applied in 1 patient, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in 27 patients, and tomotherapy in 2 patients. Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) with gold fiducial registration was adopted. Twenty-six patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The median time of ADT was 6 months. Progression⁃free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. All grade ≥1 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late morbidity criteria , and GU and GI toxicities were cumulatively calculated. Results: After a median follow-up of 102 months (65~131 months), the 10-year OS was 90.0%(95% confidence interval, 83.3%-96.7%), and the 10-year PFS was 86.5% (95% confidence interval, 79.1%-93.9%). According to CTCAE 5.0, grade 1 acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity developed in 12 patients, grade 2 in 2 patients, grade 3 in 2 patients, and grade 1 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity developed in 12 patients, grade 2 in 2 patients, and no grade 3 or higher toxicity occurred. According to RTOG late morbidity criteria, late (≥3 months after radiotherapy) grade 1 GI toxicity developed in 4 patients (13.3%), grade 2 in 1 (3.3%), grade 3 in 1 (3.3%), and late grade 1 GU toxicity occurred in 1 patient (3.3%), grade 2 in 1 (3.3%), grade 3 in 1 (3.3%). No grade 4 or higher GI and GU toxicities developed. Only one grade 3 GI and one grade 2 GU toxicities were observed for the maximum toxicity at the last follow-up. The potency was not evaluated. Conclusions: The 10-year oncologic outcomes of this shortened hypofractionated IMRT regimen for mainly low/intermediate risk prostate cancer patients is favorable with acceptable acute and late toxicities.

10 - The presence of prostate cancer in MRI/ Fusion targeted biopsies for patients with PSA 1.0-2.0 ng/ml above NADIR after radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer

10 - The presence of prostate cancer in MRI/ Fusion targeted biopsies for patients with PSA 1.0-2.0 ng/ml above NADIR after radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer