Radiosurgery For Multiple Brain Metastases Research Articles

Well calculated is better than quickly calculated: Comparison of Pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms according to the number of lesions and fractionation in radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases

PurposeIn this work we compared pencil beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in single isocenter plans of multiple brain metastases radiosurgery (SIMM-SRS) plans using the quality indices reported for SRS. MethodThe plans were evaluated concerning the prescribed dose, fractions and the number of metastases. The quality indices studied were mean dose (Dmean), D95, Paddick conformity index (PCI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) homogeneity (HIRTOG) and quality of coverage indices (QRTOG), gradient index (GI), efficiency index for targets (Gη12Gy) and organs at risk (OARη12Gy) and V12-V18 for brain. ResultsThe D95 for plans calculated with PB algorithm increased and differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). For Dmean no differences were observed (p > 0.194). The PCI for the single-fraction cases showed statistical significant differences (p < 0.039). The PCI for the three-fraction cases did not show statistical significant difference (p < 0.569). However, the mean value of the index for all cases did not differ significantly between PB (0.84) and MC (0.81). The GI showed statistically significant differences, only for the plans with more than 10 metastases for a single-fraction (p = 0.0001). The Gη12Gy values reported are within the interval of 0.26–0.80, and for all cases, there were no statistically significant differences. ConclusionConsidering that MC is more accurate for small volumes and heterogeneities, and computational time is reasonable for clinical use, it should be selected in all cases for SIMM-SRS plans. We introduced the potential of novel indices as Gη12Gy, and OARη12Gy for clinical evaluation that potentially serve as optimization factor.

3190: Can spot-scanning hadron arc be used as stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases?

3190: Can spot-scanning hadron arc be used as stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases?

370 Film processing for auditing of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases

370 Film processing for auditing of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases

Technical Notes: Robustness of three-dimensional treatment and imaging isocenter testing using a new gel dosimeter and kilovoltage CBCT.

Coincidence of the treatment and imaging isocenter coordinates is required to safely perform small-margin treatments, such as stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases. A comprehensive and direct methodology for verifying concordance of kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) and treatment coordinates using an x-ray CT-based polymer gel dosimeter (dGEL) and onboard kV-CBCT was previously reported. Using this methodology, we tested the ability of a new commercially available x-ray CT-based polymer dGEL with a rapid response to provide efficient quality assurance (QA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of the three-dimensional geometric QA methodology using dGEL. The dGEL were commercially manufactured. The prescribed dose for each field was determined by visually identifying the 5, 10, and 20Gy isodose lines. A linear accelerator was used to irradiate the gels with seven non-coplanar beams. An in-house analysis program was used to identify the beam axes and treatment isocenter in kV-CBCT coordinates by processing the pre- and post-irradiation CBCT images. The impact of the radiation dose on the test reproducibility was examined, and the detectability of an intentional geometric error was assessed. The treatment isocenter was within 0.4mm of the imaging isocenter for all radiation doses. The residual error of the test with the intentional error was within 0.2mm. The analysis and image quality variations for a single dGEL introduced displacement errors less than 0.3mm. The test assessed the coincidence of treatment and kV-CBCT isocenter coordinates and detected errors with high robustness. Even for a 10Gy dose, the test yielded results comparable with those obtained using higher radiation doses owing to the rapid response of the dGEL dosimeter.

2421: Model-based VMAT optimization: The future of radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases?

2421: Model-based VMAT optimization: The future of radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases?

Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review.

GammaKnife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) have been the mainstay stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) solution for multiple brain metastases (MBM) for several years. Recent technological advancement has seen an increase in single-isocentre C-arm linac-based SRS. This systematic review focuses on dosimetric and geometric insights into contemporary MBM SRS and thereby establish if linac-based SRS has matured to match the mainstay SRS delivery systems. The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were interrogated which yielded 891 relevant articles that narrowed to 20 articles after removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies which reported the use of SRS for treatment of MBM SRS and reported the technical aspects including dosimetry were included. The review was limited to English language publications from January 2015 to August 2023. Only full-length papers were included in the final analysis. Opinion papers, commentary pieces, letters to the editor, abstracts, conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The reporting of conformity indices (CI) and gradient indices, V12Gy, monitor units and the impact of translational and rotational shifts were extracted and analysed. The single-isocentre technique for MBM dominated recent SRS studies and the most studied delivery platforms were Varian. The C-arm linac-based SRS plan quality and normal brain tissue sparing was comparable to GK and CK and in some cases better. The most used nominal beam energy was 6FFF, and optimised couch and collimator angles could reduce mean normal brain dose by 11.3%. Reduction in volume of the healthy brain receiving a certain dose was dependent on the number and size of the metastases and the relative geometric location. GK and CK required 4.5-8.4 times treatment time compared with linac-based SRS. Rotational shifts caused larger changes in CI in C-arm linac-based single-isocentre SRS. C-arm linac-based SRS produced comparable MBM plan quality and the delivery is notably shorter compared to GK and CK SRS.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Review of Treatment Techniques.

The advancement of systemic targeted treatments has led to improvements in the management of metastatic disease, particularly in terms of survival outcomes. However, brain metastases remain less responsive to systemic therapies, underscoring the significance of local interventions for comprehensive disease control. Over the past years, the threshold for treating brain metastases through stereotactic radiosurgery has risen. Yet, as the number of treated metastases increases, treatment complexity and duration also escalate. This trend has made multi-isocenter radiosurgery treatments, such as those with the Gamma Knife, challenging to plan and lengthy for patients. In contrast, single-isocenter approaches employing linear accelerators offer an efficient and expeditious treatment option. This review delves into the literature, comparing different linear-accelerator-based techniques with each other and in relation to dedicated systems, focusing on dosimetric considerations and feasibility.

Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans.

In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife® (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality. For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTVtot). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V12) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V12. The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTVtot less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%). CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTVtot.

Dosimetric Impact of Lesion Number, Size, and Volume on Mean Brain Dose with Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases.

We evaluated the effect of lesion number and volume for brain metastasis treated with SRS using GammaKnife® ICON™ (GK) and CyberKnife® M6™ (CK). Four sets of lesion sizes (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10-15 mm, and >15 mm) were contoured and prescribed a dose of 20 Gy/1 fraction. The number of lesions was increased until a threshold mean brain dose of 8 Gy was reached; then individually optimized to achieve maximum conformity. Across GK plans, mean brain dose was linearly proportional to the number of lesions and total GTV for all sizes. The numbers of lesions needed to reach this threshold for GK were 177, 57, 29, and 10 for each size group, respectively; corresponding total GTVs were 3.62 cc, 20.37 cc, 30.25 cc, and 57.96 cc, respectively. For CK, the threshold numbers of lesions were 135, 35, 18, and 8, with corresponding total GTVs of 2.32 cc, 12.09 cc, 18.24 cc, and 41.52 cc respectively. Mean brain dose increased linearly with number of lesions and total GTV while V8 Gy, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy showed quadratic correlations to the number of lesions and total GTV. Modern dedicated intracranial SRS systems allow for treatment of numerous brain metastases especially for ≤10 mm; clinical evidence to support this practice is critical to expansion in the clinic.

Multicenter analysis of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases from EGFR and ALK driven non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionPatients with brain metastases (BrMs) arising from EGFR and ALK driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have favorable prognoses and evolving treatment options. We evaluated multicenter outcomes for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to multiple (≥4) BrMs, where randomized data remain limited. MethodsData were collected retrospectively from 5 academic centers on EGFR and ALK NSCLC who received SRS to ≥4 BrMs with their first SRS treatment between 2008 and 2018. Analyzed endpoints included overall survival (OS), freedom from CNS progression (FFCNSP), and freedom from whole-brain radiotherapy (FFWBRT). ResultsEighty-nine patients (50 EGFR, 39 ALK) received a total of 159 SRS treatments to 1,080 BrMs, with a median follow up of 51.3 months. The median number of BrMs treated with SRS treatment-1 was 6 (range 4–26) and median for all treatments was 9 (range 4–47). Sixteen patients (18 %) had received WBRT prior to SRS treatment-1. The median OS was 24.2, 21.2, and 33.2 months for all patients, EGFR, and ALK subsets, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, only receipt of a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was associated with OS (HR 0.40, p = 0.005). No differences in OS were observed based on number of BrMs treated. The median FFCNSP was 9.4, 11.6, and 7.5 months, for all patients, EGFR, and ALK subsets, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the number of BrMs (continuous) treated during treatment-1 was the only negative prognostic factor associated with FFCNSP (HR 1.071, p = 0.045). The 5-year FFWBRT was 73.6 %. ConclusionsThis multicenter analysis over a >10-year period demonstrated favorable OS, FFCNSP, and FFWBRT, in patients with EGFR and ALK driven NSCLC receiving SRS to ≥4 BrMs. These data support SRS as an option in the upfront and salvage setting for higher burden CNS disease in this population.

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series.

BackgroundPatients with brain metastases (BM) live longer due to improved diagnosis and oncologic treatments. The association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with brain radiosurgery (SRS) allows complex dose distributions and faster treatment delivery to multiple lesions.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of SRS for brain metastasis using VMAT. The primary endpoints were local disease-free survival (LDFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were intracranial disease-free survival (IDFS) and meningeal disease-free survival (MDFS).ResultsThe average number of treated lesions was 5.79 (range: 2–20) per treatment in a total of 113 patients. The mean prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range: 12–24 Gy). The median LDFS was 46 months. The LDFS in 6, 12, and 24 months was for 86%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Moreover, brain progression occurred in 50 patients. The median overall survival was 47 months. The OS in 75%, 69%, and 61% patients was 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. IDFS was 6 and 24 months in 35% and 14% patients, respectively. The mean MDFS was 62 months; it was 6 and 24 months for 87% and 83% of patients. Acute severe toxicity was relatively rare. During follow-up, the rates of radionecrosis and neurocognitive impairment were low (10%).ConclusionThe use of VMAT–SRS for multiple BM was feasible, effective, and associated with low treatment-related toxicity rates. Thus, treatment with VMAT is a safe technique to plan to achieve local control without toxicity.

Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric evaluation of two automated treatment planning systems

PurposeAutomated treatment planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)-based single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases. In this study, we compared plan quality between Brainlab Elements Multiple Brain Metastases (Elements MBM) software which utilizes dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and Varian HyperArc (HA) software using a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique.Patients and methodsBetween July 2018 and April 2021, 36 consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old with 367 metastases who received SIMT SRS at UPMC Hillman Cancer San Pietro Hospital, Rome, were retrospectively evaluated. SRS plans were created using the commercial software Elements MBM SRS (Version 1.5 and 2.0). Median cumulative gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning tumor volume (PTV) were 1.33 cm3 and 3.42 cm3, respectively. All patients were replanned using HA automated software. Extracted dosimetric parameters included mean dose (Dmean) to the healthy brain, volumes of the healthy brain receiving more than 5, 8,10, and 12 Gy (V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy), and doses to hippocampi.ResultsBoth techniques resulted in high-quality treatment plans, although Element MBM DCAT plans performed significantly better than HA VMAT plans, especially in cases of more than 10 lesions). Median V12Gy was 13.6 (range, 1.87–45.9) cm3 for DCAT plans and 18.5 (2.2–62,3) cm3 for VMAT plans (p < 0.0001), respectively. Similarly, V10Gy, V8Gy, V5Gy (p < 0.0001) and median dose to the normal brain (p = 0.0001) were favorable for DCAT plans.ConclusionsBoth Elements MBM and HA systems were able to generate high-quality plans in patients with up to 25 brain metastases. DCAT plans performed better in terms of normal brain sparing, especially in patients with more than ten lesions and limited total tumor volume.

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series

Background: Patients with brain metastases (BM) live longer due to improved diagnosis and oncologic treatments. The association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with brain radiosurgery (SRS) allows complex dose distributions and faster treatment delivery to multiple lesions . Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of SRS for brain metastasis using VMAT. The primary endpoints were local disease-free survival (LDFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were intracranial disease-free survival (IDFS) and meningeal disease-free survival (MDFS). Results: The average number of treated lesions was 5.79 (range: 2–20) per treatment in a total of 113 patients. The mean prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range: 12–24 Gy). The median LDFS was 46 months. The LDFS in 6, 12, and 24 months was for 86%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Moreover, brain progression occurred in 50 patients. The median overall survival was 47 months. The OS in 75%, 69%, and 61% patients was 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. IDFS was 6 and 24 months in 35% and 14% patients, respectively. The mean MDFS was 62 months; it was 6 and 24 months for 87% and 83% of patients. Acute severe toxicity was relatively rare. During follow-up, the rates of radionecrosis and neurocognitive impairment were low (10%). Conclusion: The use of VMAT–SRS for multiple BM was feasible, effective, and associated with low treatment-related toxicity rates. Thus, treatment with VMAT is a safe technique to plan to achieve local control without toxicity.

Single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Impact of patient misalignments on target coverage in non-coplanar treatments

Frameless single-isocenter non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with multiple brain metastases is a treatment at high geometrical complexity. The goal of this study is to analyze the dosimetric impact of non-coplanar image guidance with stereoscopic X-ray imaging. Such an analysis is meant to provide insights on the adequacy of safety margins, and to evaluate the benefit of imaging at non-coplanar configurations.The ExacTrac® (ET) system (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) was used for stereoscopic X-ray imaging in frameless single-isocenter non-coplanar SRS for multiple brain metastases. Sub-millimeter precision was found for the ET-based pre-treatment setup, whereas a degradation was noted for non-coplanar treatment angles. Misalignments without intra-fractional positioning corrections were reconstructed in 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) to resemble the situation without non-coplanar image guidance.Dose recalculation in 20 SRS patients with applied positioning corrections did not reveal any significant differences in D98% for 75 planning target volumes (PTVs) and gross tumor volumes (GTVs). For recalculation without applied positioning corrections, significant differences (p<0.05) were reported in D98% for both PTVs and GTVs, with stronger effects for small PTV volumes. A worst-case analysis at increasing translational and rotational misalignment revealed that dosimetric changes are a complex function of the combination thereof.This study highlighted the important role of positioning correction with ET at non-coplanar configurations in frameless single-isocenter non-coplanar SRS for patients with multiple brain metastases. Uncorrected patient misalignments at non-coplanar couch angles were linked to a significant loss of PTV coverage, with effects varying according to the combination of single DoF and PTV geometrical properties.

P122 - Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric performance of two planning techniques and two setup approaches

P122 - Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric performance of two planning techniques and two setup approaches

P72 - Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: does MR/CT co-registration improve target localization accuracy compared to the MR-only approach?

P72 - Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: does MR/CT co-registration improve target localization accuracy compared to the MR-only approach?

Simultaneous radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: technical overview of the UCLA experience

Purpose/objective(s)To communicate our institutional experience with single isocenter radiosurgery treatments for multiple brain metastases, including challenges with determining planning target volume (PTV) margins and resulting consequences, image-guidance translational and rotational tolerances, intra-fraction patient motion, and prescription considerations with larger PTV margins.Materials/methodsEight patient treatments with 51 targets were planned with various margins using Elements Multiple Brain Mets SRS treatment planning software (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). Forty-eight plans with 0 mm, 1 mm and 2 mm margins were created, including plans with variable margins, where targets more than 6 cm away from the isocenter were planned with larger margins. The dosimetric impact of the margins were analyzed with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy values. Additionally, 12 patient motion data were analyzed to determine both the impact of the repositioning threshold and the distributions of the patient translational and rotational movements.ResultsThe V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy volumes approximately doubled when margins change from 0 to 1 mm and tripled when change from 0 to 2 mm. With variable margins, the aggregated results are similar to results from plans using the lower of two margins, since only 12.2% of the targets were more than 6 cm away from the isocenter. With 0.5 mm re-positioning threshold, 57.4% of the time the patients are repositioned. Reducing the threshold to 0.25 mm results in 91.7% repositioning rate, due to limitations of the fusion algorithm and actual patient motion. The 90th percentile of translational movements in all directions is 0.7 mm, while the 90th percentile of rotational movements in all directions is 0.6 degrees. Median translations and rotations are 0.2 mm and 0.2 degrees, respectively.ConclusionsBased on the data presented, we have switched our modus operandi from 2 to 1 mm PTV margins, with an eventual goal of using 0.5 and 1.0 mm variable margins when an automated margin assignment method becomes available. The 0.5 mm and 0.5 degrees repositioning thresholds are clinically appropriate with small residual patient movements.

Practical Considerations for Single Isocenter LINAC Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases

The purpose of this paper is to summarize treatment guidelines for the performance of single isocenter LINAC radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases developed and used by 3 experienced centers. This article is not meant to provide consensus guidelines. Rather, this is a practical, “how we do it” reference without substantial discussion. To serve as a treatment reference, the great majority of the information is presented in topic-specific tables.

Predicting the effect of indirect cell kill in the treatment of multiple brain metastases via single-isocenter/multitarget volumetric modulated arc therapy stereotactic radiosurgery.

PurposeDue to spatial uncertainty, patient setup errors are of major concern for radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases (m‐bm) when using single‐isocenter/multitarget (SIMT) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. However, recent clinical outcome studies show high rates of tumor local control for SIMT‐VMAT. In addition to direct cell kill (DCK), another possible explanation includes the effects of indirect cell kill (ICK) via devascularization for a single dose of 15 Gy or more and by inducing a radiation immune intratumor response. This study quantifies the role of indirect cell death in dosimetric errors as a function of spatial patient setup uncertainty for stereotactic treatments of multiple lesions.Material and MethodsNine complex patients with 61 total tumors (2‐16 tumors/patient) were planned using SIMT‐VMAT with geometry similar to HyperArc with a 10MV‐FFF beam (2400 MU/min). Isocenter was placed at the geometric center of all tumors. Average gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 1.1 cc (0.02–11.5) and 1.9 cc (0.11–18.8) with an average distance to isocenter of 5.4 cm (2.2–8.9). The prescription was 20 Gy to each PTV. Plans were recalculated with induced clinically observable patient setup errors [±2 mm, ±2o] in all six directions. Boolean structures were generated to calculate the effect of DCK via 20 Gy isodose volume (IDV) and ICK via 15 Gy IDV minus the 20 Gy IDV. Contributions of each IDV to the PTV coverage were analyzed along with normal brain toxicity due to the patient setup uncertainty. Induced uncertainty and minimum dose covering the entire PTV were analyzed to determine the maximum tolerable patient setup errors to utilize the ICK effect for radiosurgery of m‐bm via SIMT‐VMAT.ResultsPatient setup errors of 1.3 mm /1.3° in all six directions must be maintained to achieve PTV coverage of the 15 Gy IDV for ICK. Setup errors of ±2 mm/2° showed clinically unacceptable loss of PTV coverage of 29.4 ± 14.6% even accounting the ICK effect. However, no clinically significant effect on normal brain dosimetry was observed.ConclusionsRadiosurgery of m‐bm using SIMT‐VMAT treatments have shown positive clinical outcomes even with small residual patient setup errors. These clinical outcomes, while largely due to DCK, may also potentially be due to the ICK. Potential mechanisms, such as devascularization and/or radiation‐induced intratumor immune enhancement, should be explored to provide a better understanding of the radiobiological response of stereotactic radiosurgery of m‐bm using a SIMT‐VMAT plan.

Dynamic conformal arcs-based single-isocenter VMAT planning technique for radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases

Multiple small beamlets in the delivery of highly modulated single-isocenter HyperArc VMAT plan can lead to dose delivery errors associated with small-field dosimetry, which can be a major concern for stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions. Herein, we describe and compare a clinically valuable dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based VMAT (DCA-VMAT) approach for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions using flattening filter free beams to minimize this effect. Original single-isocenter HyperArc style VMAT and DCA-VMAT plans were created on 7 patients with 2 to 8 brain lesions (total 35 lesions) for 10 MV- flattening filter free beam. 20 Gy was prescribed to each lesion. For identical planning criteria, DCA-VMAT utilizes user-controlled field aperture shaper before VMAT optimization. Plans were evaluated for conformity and target coverage, low- and intermediate dose spillages to brain volume that received more than 30% (V30%) and 50% (V50%) of prescription dose. Additionally, mean brain dose, V8, V12 and maximal dose to adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) including hippocampi were reported. Total monitor units, beam modulation factor, treatment delivery efficiency, and accuracy were recorded. Comparing with original VMAT, DCA-VMAT plans provided similar tumor dose, target coverage and conformity, yet tighter radio-surgical dose distribution with lower dose to normal brain V30% (p = 0.009), V50% (p = 0.05) and other OAR including lower dose to hippocampi. Lower total number of monitor units and smaller beam modulation factor reduced beam on time by 2.82 min (p < 0.001), on average (maximum up to 3.8 min). Beam delivery accuracy was improved by 8%, on average (p < 0.001) and maximum up to 13% in some cases for DCA-VMAT plans. This novel DCA-VMAT approach provided excellent plan quality, reduced dose to normal brain, and other OAR while significantly reducing beam-on time for radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions–improving patient compliance and clinic workflow. It also provided less MLC modulation through the targets–potentially minimizing small field dosimetry errors as demonstrated by quality assurance results. Incorporating DCA-based VMAT optimization in HyperArc module for radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions merits future investigation.