Radiological Physics Research Articles

Ensemble learning based Convolutional Neural Network – Depth Fire for detecting COVID-19 in Chest X-Ray images

The Unique Corona virus-caused COVID19 deadly disease has gave out a significant dispute to healthcare systems around the world. To stop the virus's transmission and lessen its negative effects on public health, it is crucial to recognise correctly and rapidly those who have COVID19. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) holds the capacity to increase the precision and effectiveness of COVID19 diagnosis. The purpose of the study is to build a reliable AI-based model capable correctly detect COVID19 cases from chest X-ray pictures. A dataset of 16,000 chest X-ray pictures, including COVID19 positive and negative instances, is employed in the investigation. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) the models that previously been trained are employed in the proposed model, and the output of each model is combined using an ensembling technique. The major objective of this project is to develop an accurate and reliable AI-based model to classify COVID19 cases from chest X-ray images. The individuality of this method comes in its capacity to employ data augmentation strategies to enhance model generalisation and prevent overfitting. The accuracy and dependability of the model are moreover advanced by utilising numerous pre-trained CNN models and ensembling methods. The suggested AI-based model's classification accuracy for the five classes (bacterial, COVID19 positive, negative, opacity, and viral), the three classes (COVID19 positive, negative, and healthy), and the two classes (COVID19 positive and negative) was 97.3%, 98.2%, 97.6%, and respectively. The projected model performs better in terms of sensitivity, accuracy and specificity than unconventional techniques that are previously in use. Significant ability may be guided in the suggested AI-based model's ability to recognize COVID19 cases quickly and effectively from X-rays of the chest. This approach can help radiology physicians analyse affected role quickly and correctly, improving patient outcomes and lessening the strain on healthcare systems. To ensure the precision of the diagnosis, it is vital to mention that the model's decisions should be made in consultation with a licenced medical expert.

Radiation Exposure to the Brains of Interventional Radiology Staff: A Phantom Study.

Numerous papers report the occurrence of head and neck tumors in interventional radiology (IR) physicians. Recently, appropriate dosimetry and protection have become much more important. To accomplish these, first, we should accurately understand how the brain is exposed. We assessed the dose distribution of the head and clarified the relationship between head exposure and brain dose. We used eight radiophotoluminescence dosimeters (RPLDs), two at the surface of the eyes and six inside the phantom head. We conducted measurements with three kinds of irradiation fields: one irradiated the whole head, the second irradiated the brain region, and the third irradiated the soft tissue of the face. The cranial bone reduced the brain dose to less than half the skin dose: about 48% at the front and less than 9% at the back of the brain. Due to the brain exposure, the soft tissues were slightly exposed to the scatter radiation from the cranial bone. We revealed the dose distribution of the head and the influence of the scatter radiation from the cranial bone and the soft tissues of the face. There are two kinds of scatter radiation: from the cranial bone to the soft tissue of the face, and from the soft tissue to the brain. Although the influence of these sources of scatter radiation is not significant, the relationship between brain exposure and the occurrence of head and neck tumors is still unclear. Therefore, some IR physicians should keep this in mind if they receive high levels of exposure in their daily practice.

Academic Radiology Physician Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution.

Background The overall trends in academic radiology physician compensation are not well studied. Purpose To assess recent trends in academic radiology financial compensation and distribution based on rank, gender, race/ethnicity, and geography in U.S. medical schools. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis used deidentified data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Salary Report, which collects information for full-time faculty at U.S. medical schools. Financial compensation data for full-time academic radiology faculty was collected from 2017 to 2023, stratified by rank, gender, race/ethnicity, and geography. The faculty salary report includes median, 25th, and 75th percentile compensation values for each rank, which were used to analyze trends with linear regression. Median compensation values were used to compare groups based on gender, race/ethnicity, and region. Results The AAMC Faculty Salary Report data for 2023 included responses for 5847 faculty members across all radiology departments, including 306 instructors, 2758 assistant professors, 1409 associate professors, 1004 full professors, 226 chiefs, and 144 chairs. On average, median faculty compensation increased by 2.6%-4.4% per year from 2017 to 2023, with the greatest increase (by 4.4% per year) at the instructor level and smaller increases (3.4%-2.6%) at the more senior ranks. Male faculty members were consistently compensated more than women at all ranks throughout the study period. The overall salary gap remained at 6% ($455 000 for women vs $483 000 for men) throughout the study period but increased numerically from $24 000 in 2019 to $28 000 in 2023. Black/African American faculty had a lower median compensation compared with White faculty (by 4% overall; $452 000 for Black/African American faculty vs $472 000 for White faculty) at all ranks except at professor rank. Instructor compensation in the Northeast region was substantially higher (by $278 000) than other regions, but this geographic differential did not exceed $35 000 at other ranks. Conclusion This study summarized the trends of full-time academic radiology faculty compensation and showed persistent salary inequities that should be addressed as part of a broader drive to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Interdisciplinary Management of Traumatic Injuries to the Kidneys and Urinary Tract Caused by Blunt Abdominopelvic Trauma.

Purpose: Blunt abdominopelvic trauma frequently results in injuries to the urinary organs, especially in polytrauma. The urotrauma is rarely an acute life-threatening event; however, it may lead to severe complications. Methods: This review addresses the under-representation of urological trauma management in interdisciplinary medical training and its impact on patient outcomes. It compiles evidence-based recommendations and guidelines from multiple specialties, focusing on common challenges in managing these injuries. The resource is tailored for primary care physicians in radiology, trauma surgery, internal medicine, urology, and nephrology. Results: Urinary tract injuries can occur even if the patient's condition initially appears normal. An exclusion diagnosis is obligatory by contrast medium tomography of the entire urinary tract and, if suspected, an additional uroendoscopic examination. Interventional therapy by catheterisation of the urinary tract is often required. Urosurgical treatment is not commonly needed, but when there is a demand, it must be administered via an interdisciplinary approach with visceral and trauma surgery. Over 90% of life-threatening kidney injuries (usually up to grade 4-5 AAST) are presently treated by interventional radiologists. Acute kidney injury (AKI) as a complication in trauma patients may complicate clinical management and often worsens the outcome. The incidence of trauma-associated AKI in patients admitted to an intensive care unit is high. Conclusions: Patients suffering from blunt abdominopelvic trauma should ideally be referred to certified trauma centres with subspecialised or fully specialised care provided by visceral/vascular surgery, trauma surgery, interventional radiology, urology, and nephrology. This recommendation is based on the complex nature of most damage patterns.

Emergence of AI-Generated Multimedia: Visionary Physicists in Radiology Reincarnated.

AI-powered multimedia generation technologies, particularly video synthesis through stable diffusion and transformers, offer transformative potential for radiology education, communication, and visualization. This study explores various AI-generated multimedia categories, including image and video generation, as well as voice cloning, with a focus on video synthesis and future possibilities like scan-to-video generation. Utilizing tools such as Midjourney, RunwaymL Gen2, D-ID, and ElevenLabs, we aimed to reincarnate deceased influential physicists in radiology, demonstrating AI's capability to generate realistic content with accessible tools, fostering creativity and innovation in the radiology community. We created 440 images through 110 prompts using image-to-image generation, 22 videos via image-to-video generation, and two videos showcasing text-to-voice and voice cloning techniques from December 1-7, 2023. Realism decreased from image-to-image to image-to-video and voiceover-to-video generations, with the latter requiring adjustments for lip, mouth, and head movements without incorporating facial expressions, eye movement, or hand motions. Potential applications in radiology include improving and speeding up medical 3D visualization, as well as enhancing educational content, information delivery, patient interactions, and teleconsultations. The paper addresses limitations and ethical considerations associated with AI-generated content, emphasizing responsible use and interdisciplinary collaboration for further development. These technologies are rapidly evolving, and future versions are expected to address current challenges. The ongoing advancements in AI-generated multimedia have the potential to revolutionize various aspects of radiology practice, education, and patient care, opening new avenues for research and clinical applications in the field.

Intersectionality and Faculty Compensation in Academic Radiology in U.S.

The impact of intersectionality on academic radiology physician compensation is not well known. The aim of this study was to assess impact of intersectionality on academic radiology financial compensation, based on rank, gender and race/ethnicity in US medical schools. Data werecollected from the AAMC Faculty Salary Survey, which collects information for full-time faculty at U.S. medical schools. Financial compensation data for radiology faculty with MD or equivalent degree in diagnostic radiology (DR) as well as interventional radiology (IR) was collected for 2023, stratified by rank, gender, and race/ethnicity. The AAMC Faculty Salary Survey data for 2023 included responses for 683 IR (138 women, 545 men) and 2431 DR (862 women, 1569 men) faculty. Men had a higher median compensation than women at all ranks, for both IR and DR, except DR instructors. The gender pay gap was greater in IR faculty compared to DR faculty of the same rank. All intersectional groups among IR faculty reported a lower median compensation compared to White men of the same rank. All intersectional groups among DR faculty, except Asian Men, had a lower median compensation than White men of the same rank. Among IR faculty, Asian women assistant professors faced the greatest disparity in median compensation, down to $75K (15%) lower than White men. Among DR faculty, Black/African American women assistant professors faced the greatest disparity on median compensation, down to $48K (10.5%) lower than White men. The study results raise important concerns about impact of intersectionality on faculty compensation in radiology which needs further study and should be addressed as part of broader drive to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in academic radiology.

Proportion of industry payment value by category in radiology relative to other specialties

BackgroundIndustry payments to physicians are common, but it is unknown how the payments in different categories to radiologists compare to other specialties. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the proportion of industry payments to physicians in radiology in certain categories relative to other specialties. MethodsThe Open Payments Database was analyzed from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 for industry payments to all allopathic & osteopathic physicians, and classified into distinct clinical specialties. Payments to physicians in three categories were calculated in relation to total payments in each specialty during the study period: consulting fees, research, and royalties/ownership (royalty, license, or current or prospective ownership or investment). ResultsThe total value of industry payments to physicians across all specialties was just under $13 billion over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022. During this period, 51.4 million total payments were made to 791,746 physicians. US physicians in radiology received 452,027 payments for a total value of $357 million (2.8 % of total value). For radiologists, 32.8 % of industry payment value was attributed to royalties/ownership and 9.9 % to research, collectively adding up to 42.7 % of all industry payment. The only specialties with higher payments in these two categories considered reflective of innovation payments were the surgical specialties with higher royalty payments. ConclusionThe proportion of industry payments in radiology in categories reflecting innovation (royalty/ownership and research fees) is high and second only to surgical specialties.

Radiation Exposure and Safety Considerations in Interventional Radiology: Comparison of a Twin Robotic X-ray System to a Conventional Angiography System.

Background/Objectives: To evaluate radiation exposure in standard interventional radiology procedures using a twin robotic X-ray system compared to a state-of-the-art conventional angiography system. Methods: Standard interventional radiology procedures (port implantation, SIRT, and pelvic angiography) were simulated using an anthropomorphic Alderson RANDO phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories Inc. Stamford, CT, USA) on an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray scanner (Multitom Rax, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) and a conventional below-the-table angiography system (Artis Zeego, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). The phantom's radiation exposure (representing the potential patient on the procedure table) was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Height-dependent dose curves were generated for examiners and radiation technologists in representative positions using a RaySafe X2 system (RaySafe, Billdal, Sweden). Results: For all scenarios, the device-specific dose distribution differs depending on the imaging chain, with specific advantages and disadvantages. Radiation exposure for the patient is significantly increased when using the Multitom Rax for pelvic angiography compared to the Artis Zeego, which is evident in the dose progression through the phantom's body as well as in the organ-related radiation exposure. In line with these findings, there is an increased radiation exposure for the performing proceduralist, especially at eye level, which can be significantly minimized by using protective equipment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, the state-of-the-art conventional below-the-table angiography system is associated with lower radiation dose exposures for both the patient and the interventional radiology physician compared to an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray system for pelvic angiographies. However, in other clinical scenarios (port implantation or SIRT), both devices are suitable options with acceptable radiation exposure.

Should Breastfeeding Be Interrupted after Radiological Imaging Examinations? Evidence and Clinical Applications.

Purpose: Breastfeeding provides optimal growth and development for infants. Lactating mothers may have challenges maintaining breastfeeding, and one of those challenges is being falsely advised to interrupt breastfeeding following radiologic studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and experiences of healthcare professionals regarding breastfeeding after radiological imaging studies on lactating mothers. Method: In this cross-sectional study, an online survey consisting of 29 semi-structured questions was delivered to radiology technicians and physicians in radiology and pediatrics via social media. Mixed methods were used to analyze responses descriptively. Results: Of the 404 participants, 39% (n = 158) were radiology technicians, 31% (n = 125) were pediatricians, 11% (n = 46) were radiologists, 10% (n = 41) were pediatric residents and 8% (n = 34) were radiology residents. Of all healthcare professionals, 91% reported that breastfeeding does not need to be interrupted after ultrasound, 75% X-ray, 56% mammography, 62% non-contrast CT, 18% contrast-enhanced CT, 93% non-contrast MRI and 23% contrast-enhanced MRI. Interruption of breastfeeding was recommended more frequently after contrast-enhanced imaging studies (p < 0.01). After contrast-enhanced CT, 54% of participants recommended pumping and dumping for <24 h and 25% for 24-48 h; after contrast-enhanced MRI, these rates were found to be 57% and 20%, respectively. Of the healthcare professionals, 63% reported that their knowledge about management of breastfeeding after radiological studies was not sufficient. Conclusions: Situations requiring the interruption of breastfeeding after radiological studies are rare. However, recommendations in clinical practice vary in our country. Increasing the awareness and knowledge of healthcare professionals will prevent breastfeeding from being negatively affected.

Clinician overconfidence in visual estimation of the posthepatectomy liver remnant volume: A proximal source of liver failure after major hepatic resection?

BackgroundPost-hepatectomy liver failure is a source of morbidity and mortality after major hepatectomy and is related to the volume of the future liver remnant. The accuracy of a clinician’s ability to visually estimate the future liver remnant without formal computed tomography liver volumetry is unknown. MethodsTwenty physicians in diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery reviewed 20 computed tomography scans of patients without underlying liver pathology who were not scheduled for liver resection. We evaluated clinician accuracy to estimate the future liver remnant for 3 hypothetical major hepatic resections: left hepatectomy, right hepatectomy, and right trisectionectomy. The percent-difference between the mean and actual computed tomography liver volumetry (mean percent difference) was tested along with specialty differences using mixed-effects regression analysis. ResultsThe actual future liver remnant (computed tomography liver volumetry) remaining after a hypothetical left hepatectomy ranged from 59% to 75% (physician estimated range: 50%–85%), 23% to 40% right hepatectomy (15%–50%), and 13% to 29% right trisectionectomy (8%–39%). For right hepatectomy, the mean future liver remnant was overestimated by 95% of clinicians with a mean percent difference of 22% (6%–45%; P < .001). For right trisectionectomy, 90% overestimated the future liver remnant by a mean percent difference of 25% (6%–50%; P < .001). Hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons overestimated the future liver remnant for proposed right hepatectomy and right trisectionectomy by a mean percent difference of 25% and 34%, respectively. Based on years of experience, providers with <10 years of experience had a greater mean percent difference than providers with 10+ years of experience for hypothetical major hepatic resections, but was only significantly higher for left hepatectomy (9% vs 6%, P = .002). ConclusionA clinician’s ability to visually estimate the future liver remnant volume is inaccurate when compared to computed tomography liver volumetry. Clinicians tend to overestimate the future liver remnant volume, especially in patients with a small future liver remnant where the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure is greatest.

Digital eye strain and its associated factors among radiology physicians in Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey using logistic regression analysis.

Increased use of digital devices in the modern era has led to the development of digital eye strain (DES) or computer vision syndrome in their users. This can result in the development of various ocular and visual symptoms among them. In this study, the authors aimed to view the prevalence of digital eye strain among radiology physicians in Pakistan and their associated risk factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate occupational DES among radiology physicians in Pakistan. The data collection was done using the convenience sampling technique, and the data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 25.0. Out of the 247 respondents, 33.6% were males and 66.4% were females. 41.7% of them were between 30 and 40 years of age and 51.8% of them were radiology residents. 52.2% of the participants had a refractive error and were using a corrective lens. The majority of the radiologists in our study (84.2%) preferred picture archiving and communication system (PACS) over films and 82.2% of them reported having breaks of less than 15 min. Major symptoms reported by the participants were tired or heavy eyes (69.6%) and headache (69.3%). The proportion of developing DES was higher in females [P=0.001, adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=2.94], radiology residents (P=0.031, aOR=3.29), and working hours of more than 4 h per day (P<0.001, aOR=0.04). With recent advances in the field of radiology in Pakistan, the frequency of developing DES among radiologists is increasing. Being a female, having long working hours, and having noticeable flickers on the digital screens were among the significant factors in developing DES among radiologists.

Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction among Interventional Radiologists in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study.

This study aims to measure job satisfaction among interventional radiology physicians in Japan and analyze the factors affecting job satisfaction. A web-based survey was conducted among the members of the Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology between October and December 2021. Participants were questioned regarding their job satisfaction, workplace, work status, and demographic information. Principal component analysis was applied to 15 reasons related to job satisfaction, and the factors affecting job satisfaction were analyzed. Valid responses were obtained from 901 (31.9%) of the 2,824 interventional radiology physicians invited to participate. Job satisfaction was reported as "very satisfied" in 79 (8.8%), "moderately satisfied" in 426 (47.3%), "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" in 230 (25.5%), "moderately dissatisfied" in 133 (14.8%), and "very dissatisfied" in 33 (3.7%) respondents. Thus, there were 505 (56.0%) satisfied physicians. Three principal components were extracted from the reasons for job satisfaction. Job satisfaction tended to be higher among those who reported performing a higher number of interventional radiology procedures and was positively associated with a higher rate of work time dedicated to interventional radiology and the first principal component (the environment of clinical practice, research, and interventional radiology education). The third principal component (salary and work environment) and the absence of an "IkuBoss" [a boss who takes initiative in creating a work environment supportive of the work-life balance of colleagues] were associated with lower job satisfaction. More than half the participants reported high job satisfaction. Job satisfaction of interventional radiology physicians in Japan was positively associated with a favorable clinical, research, and educational environment and negatively associated with the absence of an "IkuBoss," noninterventional radiology work, overtime work, and salary.

Preclinical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the fields of radiological technology, medical physics, and radiology.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable diagnostic imaging technique used in the clinical setting. MRI is advantageous over X-ray and computed tomography (CT), because the contrast provided depends on differences in the density of various organ tissues. In addition to MRI systems in hospitals, more than 100 systems are used for research purposes in Japan in various fields, including basic scientific research, molecular and clinical investigations, and life science research, such as drug discovery, veterinary medicine, and food testing. For many years, additional preclinical imaging studies have been conducted in basic research in the fields of radiation technology, medical physics, and radiology. The preclinical MRI research includes studies using small-bore and whole-body MRI systems. In this review, we focus on the animal study using small-bore MRI systems as "preclinical MRI". The preclinical MRI can be used to elucidate the pathophysiology of diseases and for translational research. This review will provide an overview of previous preclinical MRI studies such as brain, heart, and liver disease assessments. Also, we provide an overview of the utility of preclinical MRI studies in radiological physics and technology.

The Pattern of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT.

The study aimed to compare the metastatic pattern of breast cancer and the intermodality proportion of agreement between [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were enrolled prospectively and underwent a combined [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT scan to diagnose MBC. Experienced nuclear medicine and radiology physicians evaluated the scans blinded to the opposite scan results. Descriptive statistics were applied, and the intermodality proportion of agreement was used to compare [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. In total, 76 women with verified MBC were enrolled in the study. The reported number of site-specific metastases for [18F]FDG-PET/CT vs. CE-CT was 53 (69.7%) vs. 44 (57.9%) for bone lesions, 31 (40.8%) vs. 43 (56.6%) for lung lesions, and 16 (21.1%) vs. 23 (30.3%) for liver lesions, respectively. The proportion of agreement between imaging modalities was 76.3% (95% CI 65.2-85.3) for bone lesions; 82.9% (95% CI 72.5-90.6) for liver lesions; 57.9% (95% CI 46.0-69.1) for lung lesions; and 59.2% (95% CI 47.3-70.4) for lymph nodes. In conclusion, bone and distant lymph node metastases were reported more often by [18F]FDG-PET/CT than CE-CT, while liver and lung metastases were reported more often by CE-CT than [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Agreement between scans was highest for bone and liver lesions and lowest for lymph node metastases.

The AAPM/ASTRO 2023 Core Physics Curriculum for Radiation Oncology Residents

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Oncology Medical Physics Education Subcommittee (ROMPES) has updated the radiation oncology physics core curriculum for medical residents in the radiation oncology specialty. Thirteen physicists from the United States and Canada involved in radiation oncology resident education were recruited to ROMPES. The group included doctorates and master's of physicists with a range of clinical or academic roles. Radiation oncology physician and resident representatives were also consulted in the development of this curriculum. In addition to modernizing the material to include new technology, the updated curriculum is consistent with the format of the American Board of Radiology Physics Study Guide Working Group to promote concordance between current resident educational guidelines and examination preparation guidelines. The revised core curriculum recommends 56 hours of didactic education like the 2015 curriculum but was restructured to provide resident education that facilitates best clinical practice and scientific advancement in radiation oncology. The reference list, glossary, and practical modules were reviewed and updated to include recent literature and clinical practice examples. ROMPES has updated the core physics curriculum for radiation oncology residents. In addition to providing a comprehensive curriculum to promote best practice for radiation oncology practitioners, the updated curriculum aligns with recommendations from the American Board of Radiology Physics Study Guide Working Group. New technology has been integrated into the curriculum. The updated curriculum provides a framework to appropriately cover the educational topics for radiation oncology residents in preparation for their subsequent career development.

Accuracy of ultrasound two-point compression test in the diagnosis of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in emergency departments

Abstract Background Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. DVT is not a clinical diagnosis, and a definitive diagnosis requires imaging. Compression ultrasound (US) is a noninvasive tool for diagnosing DVT that is considered very precise. It takes place in two simple proximal points (femoral and popliteal) and depends on a complex assessment of the venous system’s compression ability. Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate how accurate the US two-point compression test (2PCT) regarding diagnosis of lower limb DVT by emergency physicians in ED. Patients and methods This study was conducted on 50 patients with suspected DVT in Tanta University Emergency Hospital in a duration of 1 year on patients suspected to have DVT using Wells’ criteria, comparing the accuracy of 2PCT performed by emergency physicians and duplex US done by radiology physicians. Patients presented with suspected lower extremity DVT were recruited into this study. Results The sensitivity of 2PCT is 80%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 90.32%, negative predictive value 63.16%, and the overall accuracy is 80%. Conclusion US performed by emergency physicians for the diagnosis of DVT can give accurate and reliable results. 2PCT test is a good tool in detecting DVT in EDs with an overall accuracy of 80%.

Contemporary cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) training: Serial surveys of the international CCT community by the Fellow and Resident Leaders of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) Committee (FiRST) and SCCT Future Leaders Program (FLP)

BackgroundAs cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) practice evolves, the demand for specialists continues to increase. However, CCT training remains variable globally with limited contemporaneous data to understand this heterogeneity. We sought to understand the role of CCT globally and the training available to underpin its use. MethodsWe performed two consecutive surveys of cardiology and radiology physicians, two years apart, utilizing the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) website, weblinks, social media platforms, and meeting handouts to maximize our response rate. We compared United States (US)-based vs. international responses to understand global similarities and differences in practice and training in the surveys. Results235 respondents (37% trainees and 63% educators/non-trainees) initiated the first survey with 174 (74%) completing the core survey, with 205 providing their work location (114 US and 91 international). Eighty-four percent (92/110) of educator respondents stated a need for increased training opportunities to meet growing demand. Dedicated training fellowships are heterogenous, with limited access to structural heart imaging training, despite structural scanning being performed within institutions. The lack of a standardized curriculum was identified as the main obstacle to effective CCT learning, particularly in the US, with web-based learning platforms being the most popular option for improving access to CCT training. 148 trainees initiated the second survey with 107 (72%) completing the core components (51% North America, 49% international). Only 68% said they would be able to meet their required CCT education needs via their training program. Obstacles in obtaining CCT training again included a lack of a developed curriculum (51%), a lack of dedicated training time (35%), and a lack of local faculty expertise (31%). There was regional variability in access to CCT training, and, in contrast to the first survey, most (89%) felt 1:1 live review of cases with trained/expert reader was most useful for improving CCT training alongside formal curriculum/live lectures (72%). ConclusionsThere is a need to expand dedicated CCT training globally to meet the demand for complex CCT practice. Access to CCT education (didactic and 1:1 case-based teaching from expert faculty), implementation of recently published global training curricula, and increased teaching resources (web-based) as an adjunct to existing experiential learning opportunities, are all deemed necessary to address current educational shortfalls.

The signs of computer tomography combined with artificial intelligence can indicate the correlation between status of consciousness and primary brainstem hemorrhage of patients

For patients of primary brainstem hemorrhage (PBH), it is crucial to find a method that can quickly and accurately predict the correlation between status of consciousness and PBH. To analyze the value of computer tomography (CT) signs in combination with artificial intelligence (AI) technique in predicting the correlation between status of consciousness and PBH. A total of 120 patients with PBH were enrolled from August 2011 to March 2021 according to the criteria. Patients were divided into three groups [consciousness, minimally conscious state (MCS) and coma] based on the status of consciousness. Then, first, Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman rank correlation test were used on the factors: gender, age, stages of intracerebral hemorrhage, CT signs with AI or radiology physicians, hemorrhage involving the midbrain or ventricular system. We collected hemorrhage volumes and mean CT values with AI. Second, those significant factors were screened out by the Mann-Whitney U test and those highly or moderately correlated by Spearman's rank correlation test, and a further ordinal multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to find independent predictors of the status of consciousness. At last, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to calculate the hemorrhage volume for predictively assessing the status of consciousness. Preliminary meaningful variables include hemorrhage involving the midbrain or ventricular system, hemorrhage volume, grade of hematoma shape and density, and CT value from Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman rank correlation test. It is further shown by ordinal multinomial logistic regression analysis that hemorrhage volume and hemorrhage involving the ventricular system are two major predictors of the status of consciousness. It showed from ROC that the hemorrhage volumes of <3.040 mL, 3.040 ~ 6.225 mL and >6.225 mL correspond to consciousness, MCS or coma, respectively. If the hemorrhage volume is the same, hemorrhage involving the ventricular system should be correlated with more severe disorders of consciousness (DOC). CT signs combined with AI can predict the correlation between status of consciousness and PBH. Hemorrhage volume and hemorrhage involving the ventricular system are two independent factors, with hemorrhage volume in particular reaching quantitative predictions.

Insights into handling and delivery of Y-90 radioembolization therapies.

The use of Y-90 radioembolization techniques has become a standard tool for the treatment of liver cancer and metastatic diseases that result in liver lesions. As there are only two approved forms of radioembolization therapy, the procedures for use are also fairly standardized even though exact international and interdepartmental procedures can vary. What has been less published over the years are the nuanced differences in delivery techniques and handling of the two available Y90 radioembolization therapies. This paper seeks to examine various aspects of delivery techniques, product handling, and radiation exposure that differ between the available and approved products. Understanding these differences can assist with providing more efficient treatment, confirmation of accurate therapy, more informed handling of the products, and improved training of physicians and other hospital staff. Two commercially available and approved radioembolization devices were compared to assess nuanced, but key differences between the available products regarding therapy delivery, handling of the products, and radiation exposure to patients and staff. This work is broken into two sections: (1) Therapy Delivery, (2) Radiation Safety. Therapy delivery characteristics were assessed by using an external radiation detector system with detectors placed inside of each delivery system facing the dose vial and on the output catheter lines to the patient. Additional detectors were placed near the liver of the patient and on top of the foot to measure extremities. Data were acquired continuously throughout therapy delivery to collect time activity curves (TACs) for the characterization of each therapy. These data were analyzed to assess if (a) real-time monitoring of radiation could be used to provide an accurate assessment of residual dose before the patient leaves the procedure room, and (b) can dose delivery characteristics be observed that enable improved training and quality control. Calculation of residual dose using the external detector TACs was performed by analyzing initial and final activity peaks to determine measured count rate differences. Radiation safety aspects were assessed by monitoring radiation exposure to staff handling each of the available therapy products. Nuclear medicine technologists and interventional radiology physician body and hand doses were measured for each delivered therapy using standard body and ring dosimeters. The TACs noted above collected for the liver and extremities were used to assess if any off-target or leached Y90 activity could be detected for each therapy. Blood was collected at times before, during, and after treatment and then counted on a gamma counter to assess differences in free Y90 circulating in the blood. Each patient in this study also received a post-treatment whole-body PET/CT at 2-4 h post-infusion to assess for any aggregate free Y90 deposition that may have resulted from circulating free Y90 in the subject following therapy. Calculations of residual dose in the vial following therapy using the real-time detection methods resulted in values that were not statistically different from the values calculated by nuclear medicine following the procedure ( ). Real-time collection of dose delivery data enabled observation of key characteristics related to each delivery method. For SIR-spheres procedures, the cycle of pushing the dose and visualizing with fluoro can easily be seen with each push resulting in a smaller and smaller peak with intermittent fluoroscopy pulses. TheraSpheres infusions show a rapid bolus with nearly all of the measurable injected activity being infused in the first push of the dose. Staff radiation exposure assessments showed statistically significant differences between glass and resin spheres for hand doses of physicians and technologists (p > 0.05), but no statistical difference between body doses for both products ( ). Assessments of free Y90 circulating during therapy showed that patients undergoing therapies with resin spheres had post-infusion blood levels that were 120% higher than pre-infusion levels while glass sphere therapy patients only saw a 7% rise in post-infusion blood levels. The coefficients of variation (COVs) across glass sphere measurements pre, during, and post, were only 0.008 while resin sphere measures saw much greater variability with a COV of 0.45. Both glass and resin therapies showed blood levels at 2-4 h post-injection to be similar to levels measured pre-injection. Neither therapy showed any signs of focal aggregation at 2-4 h post-infusion on whole-body PET/CT. Although glass and resin radioembolization therapies are similar, they both have unique characteristics related to their administration and handling by staff. Understanding the nuances can assist in providing more efficient delivery, better staff education, and reducing radiation exposure to everyone involved with these therapies. The use of near real-time monitoring is feasible and can be used to obtain critical information about the delivery success of a therapy and can inform physicians on their techniques to optimize their practice as well as provide more consistent training to residents.

A case of extremity over-exposure and regulatory compliance

During a routine NRC inspection, a review of historical occupational dosimetry monitoring data for interventional radiology physician AUs was questioned regarding unexpectedly low results. This was interpreted to be an indicator of noncompliance with the wearing of occupational dose monitoring devices and, therefore, required occupation dose reconstructions in order to estimate the actual dose. In an effort to comply with dose monitoring requirements, the AU interventional radiologists diligently began wearing their whole-body and ring dosimeters during all procedures including Y-90, fluoroscopy-guided and CT-guided. In the interest of patient care, an AU that performs many interventional CT-guided procedures involving the use of a cumbersome treatment device, placed his hand in the CT beam on numerous occasions to stabilize the device. This quickly resulted in a cumulative extremity exposure that exceeded allowed limits. Once we became aware of the extremity over-exposure, steps were taken to prevent any further significant extremity exposure for the remainder of the year. The over-exposure was reported to the NRC and State following regulatory requirements.