Radiographic Evidence Of Loosening Research Articles

Porous Metal Augments Have Comparable Outcomes to Other Constructs for Severe Acetabular Bone Loss at Mid-Term Follow-up

BackgroundAcetabular reconstruction options in the setting of severe bone loss remain limited, with few comparative studies published to date. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for severe bone loss using porous metal augments to cup cage and triflange prostheses. MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 180 patients who had Paprosky 3A or 3B acetabular defects and underwent revision THA. Patients treated with porous augments (n = 141) were compared with those who received cup cages or triflange constructs (n = 39). Failure of the acetabular construct was defined as undergoing acetabular revision surgery or radiographic evidence of loosening. ResultsThere was no difference in acetabular component survivorship in patients undergoing revision THA with porous augments or a cage or triflange prosthesis (92.2 versus 87.2%, P = .470) at a mean follow-up of 6.6 ± 3.4 years. Overall, survivorship free from any revision surgery was comparable between the 2 groups (78.7 versus 79.5%, P = .720). There was also no difference in dislocation (5.7 versus 10.3%, P = .309) or periprosthetic joint infection rates (7.8 versus 10.3%, P = .623). In a subgroup analysis of patients who had pelvic discontinuity (n = 47), survivorship free from any revision surgery was comparable between the 2 groups (79.5 versus 72.2%, P = .543). ConclusionsPorous metal augments in the setting of severe acetabular bone loss demonstrated excellent survivorship at intermediate-term (mean 6.6 years follow-up, even in cases of pelvic discontinuity, with comparable outcomes to cup cages and triflanges. Instability and infection remain major causes of failure in this patient population, and long-term follow-up is needed.

Mid-term Follow Up of a Highly Porous Acetabular Component for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

As implant technology has continued to improve over the past decade, there has been an increase in the utilization of highly porous metal substrate acetabular components for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). These implants have several theoretical benefits including a lower modulus of elasticity, which may result in a reduction in stress shielding, a higher coefficient of friction, which may enable better initial implant fixation, as well as higher porosity that may facilitate improved biological fixation. Although these components are implanted frequently, there are some studies that have posed concerns regarding radiographic evidence of loosening. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess: 1) The quality of fixation of porous metal acetabular components based on radiographs; 2) clinical outcomes; and 3) revision rates. A total of 159 patients (169 hips) who had undergone a primary THA utilizing a porous metal primary acetabular cup with minimum two-year follow up were assessed. The study cohort consisted of 51% women, had a mean age of 65 years (range, 30 to 92 years), a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29kg/m2 (range, 15 to 54), and a mean follow up of approximately four years (range, three to six years). Acetabular revision for component failure was documented. Radiographic assessments were independently performed by two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons to determine implant stability and radiolucencies. Clinical evaluations were made by assessing the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS-Jr) survey scores. Failure was defined as the need to revise the acetabular component, for either septic or aseptic pathology. At final follow up, one patient had definitive loosening, one had probable loosening, and three patients had possible loosening. Only 3.0% had radiolucencies or radiosclerotic lesions in at least one zone. Of these patients, three developed progressive radiolucencies. All patients achieved excellent postoperative HOOS-Jr scores, and no significant differences were noted between patients who did not have loosening compared to patients who had possible or probable loosening. Only two patients underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the cup (success rate for this implant was 98.8% [2/169]). There is a paucity of studies focused on the results of this porous metal substrate acetabular component, with some of the current literature reporting conflicting outcomes. Our study reported a low acetabular revision rate of only 1.2% at an approximate mean follow up of four years. The incidence of radiolucencies and progressive radiolucencies were lower (3.0%) than has been found in some studies. Overall, the results of this study support the utilization of this acetabular component in appropriately indicated patients. These data show a low rate of acetabular revision at mean four-year follow up.

Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Placement During Complex Acetabular Revision: Acetabular Distraction for Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity.

With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, the acetabulum is exposed from a standard posterior approach for a revision THA. The location of the superior pubic root is identified after making a recess within the anteroinferior capsule. In order to ensure that the appropriate trajectory is obtained, C-arm imaging (inlet view and orthogonal obturator outlet views) is utilized to safely predrill the screw trajectory into the superior pubic ramus. A Kirschner wire (K-wire) is then placed into the hole. With use of a metal-cutting burr on the back table, customized peripheral screw holes are placed and then the acetabular component is slid and impacted into place over the K-wire. After cup insertion, the K-wire is removed and the superior pubic ramus screw can be placed and confirmed on fluoroscopy. In general, chronic pelvic discontinuity requires surgical management with revision THA and has historically employed the use of a cup-cage construct, custom triflange implants, and/or jumbo acetabular cups with modular porous metal augments1-5. With these treatment options, it is typically necessary to insert "kickstand" screws, which function to prevent abduction failure of the acetabular cup4,5. However, in many cases of discontinuity, there may be severe ischial osteolysis, making ischial screw placement difficult or impossible. The superior pubic ramus, however, remains a reliable option that can be utilized for inferior screw fixation, even in cases of severe acetabular bone loss, and thus is especially beneficial in these difficult cases. The technique of acetabular distraction was developed because of limitations with alternative techniques. This procedure achieves cementless biologic fixation and eventual discontinuity healing as a result of lateral or peripheral acetabular distraction and resultant medial or central compression across the pelvic discontinuity. Acetabular distraction allows for intraoperative customization and cement unitization of the acetabular construct. This procedure requires the use of a "kickstand" screw or of inferior screw fixation in order to prevent abduction failure of the cup. These screws may be placed into either the ischium or superior pubic ramus. If the patient has substantial ischial osteolysis, ischial screw fixation may not be possible. If not placed in a systematic manner, pubic ramus screws can be technically challenging, and incorrect placement can result in neurovascular injury. The present video article demonstrates a reproducible technical method for safely placing a screw in the superior ramus to aid in optimal fixation of the acetabular component in cases of pelvic discontinuity. Thus far, short-term survivorship of acetabular distraction with use of a jumbo cup and kickstand screws has been about 95%. In the largest study to date assessing patients with chronic pelvic discontinuity who underwent revision THA with use of the acetabular distraction technique, only 1 of 32 patients required revision for aseptic loosening6. An additional 2 patients had evidence of radiographic loosening but did not undergo revision, and 3 had migration of the acetabular component into a more stable configuration. Radiographically, 22 of 32 patients in the study demonstrated healing of the discontinuity6. In another study assessing the survivorship of porous tantalum acetabular shells in revision THA to treat severe acetabular defects, patients with inferior screw fixation with superior pubic ramus or ischial screws had a significantly lower incidence of proximal translation of components compared with those without inferior screw fixation7. For reproducible, successful execution of this technique, it is important to confirm correct placement of the acetabular retractors at the correct anatomical locations to ensure adequate surgical visualization of the acetabulum for easy identification of the superior pubic root.It is also critical to check placement of the drill via fluoroscopy with an inlet and obturator outlet views prior to drilling.The drill should be advanced on the oscillate setting to avoid inadvertently perforating the cortical bone and damaging surrounding neurovascular structures. OR = operating roomf/u = follow-upvac = vacuum-assisted closureRSA = radiostereometric analysis.

Survivorship and clinical outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty using the Zimmer Nexel Elbow system

BackgroundTotal elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or distal humerus fracture. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of the semiconstrained Nexel Total Elbow (Nexel) at a single center. MethodsThis is a retrospective case series of consecutive Nexel TEA procedures at a single center between 2014 and 2019. Of the 21 TEAs, 18 were alive and asked to return to the clinic to complete a physical exam, radiographs, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and EuroQol 5D. Patients who could not return in person were offered a remote participation option. Outcomes included the following: implant survival, surgical complications, reoperation for any reason, radiographic assessment to identify loosening and bushing wear, and mean scores on patient-reported outcomes. ResultsThere were 11 TEA procedures who responded (61%), with eight returning to the clinic and three remote participants. The mean follow-up was 53.3 months (28-89 months). None of the TEAs were revised or reoperated on for any reason; the survival rate was 100%. One TEA (13%) had radiographic evidence of loosening, limited to the humeral component. There was no evidence of bushing wear. One TEA experienced ulnar nerve neuropraxia postoperatively, without permanent dysfunction (13%). The majority of patients reported satisfactory outcomes as measured by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (73%), with a mean score of 90 (standard deviation [sd] = 13). On average, patients reported minimal disability on the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (mean = 29, sd = 23) and relatively high health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5D, mean = 0.83, sd = 0.08). ConclusionsClinical and radiographic results of the Nexel TEA, a semiconstrained implant, were favorable. In contrast to the high complication rate and concerning radiographic findings reported previously, the current study reports 100% implant survival, with revision or indication for revision as the endpoint, and low rates of complications with an average of 53 months of follow-up. Bushing wear was not identified as a problem in this series; however, loosening of the humeral component may emerge as an indication for revision. More studies on the Nexel TEA are needed to better understand clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Does Not Appear to Compromise Fixation or Function Compared With Peel in Short-Stem Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Several methods are available for subscapularis management in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The goal of this study was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of short-stem TSA stratified by subscapularis management technique. A multicenter trial was completed evaluating primary short-stem TSA performed with a subscapularis peel (n=80) or lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) (n=59). The primary outcome measure was subscapularis function, as measured by internal rotation and strength at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, radiographic changes, and implant loosening. Patients in the peel group obtained better active internal rotation by spinal level (P=.004). No difference was seen between groups for internal rotation with 90° shoulder abduction (P=.862) or belly press (P=.903). Statistically significant improvements in functional outcomes were seen without clinical differences. Radiographic changes showed no difference in stem shift, subsidence, or at-risk loosening rate. Anterior subluxation of the humerus was observed among 2% of the LTO group vs 17% of the peel group (P=.006). At short-term follow-up, those in the peel group appear to have a better final spinal level of internal rotation, whereas those in the LTO group have a significantly lower rate of anterior humeral subluxation. Both LTO and subscapularis peel appear safe for short-stem TSA, with no radiographic evidence of loosening. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):151-155.].

Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survivorship and radiographic outcomes of a single design of metaphyseal cone used in conjunction with short cemented stems. A retrospective analysis was conducted of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) patients (June 2015 to December 2017) using porous titanium femoral or tibial cones in conjunction with short cemented stems (50-75 mm). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Survivorship, complications, and a modified Knee Society Radiographic score were analyzed. Forty-nine rTKAs were included in the study (12 femoral cones, 48 tibial cones). Varus-valgus constraint was used in 28 (57%) and a hinged bearing was used in 3 (6%) of these constructs. The majority were index rTKAs of primary components (86%), performed for aseptic loosening (51%) and reimplantation following staged treatment for infection (37%). Median follow-up was 39 months (range 25-58). Using a modified Knee Society Radiographic score, all constructs were classified as stable. Postoperatively, 4 rTKAs were complicated by recurrent infection (8%), periprosthetic fracture 2 (4%), and superficial wound infection 1 (2%). Seven rTKAs (14%) required reoperation. The majority of reoperations (4 rTKAs) were debridement and irrigation with implant retention for infection. Metaphyseal cone constructs with short cemented stems demonstrated 100% survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening without evidence of radiographic loosening in any case. Our results demonstrate excellent outcomes with the use of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems at mid-term follow-up. This construct avoids the use of long-stem fixation with the associated extraction difficulty, end of stem pain, and potential for malposition at the joint line. IV, Case Series.

No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.

Both the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) to THA have known advantages and disadvantages. The comparison between DAA and PA THA has been widely explored during the early postoperative period. However, few randomized trials have compared these approaches at a minimum follow-up of 5 years; doing so would be important to establish any differences in mid-term outcomes or complications. We performed a randomized trial comparing DAA and PA in THA in terms of (1) patient-reported outcome scores, (2) quality of life and functional outcomes assessed by the EQ-5D and 10-meter walk test results, (3) radiographic analysis, and (4) survivorship and surgical complications at a minimum of 5 years follow-up. Two hip specialist surgeons performed both DAA and PA THA using the same THA components at two hospital sites. One hundred twelve patients on the elective THA surgical waitlist were invited to participate in the study. Thirty-four patients did not meet the study's inclusion criteria and were excluded, and three patients declined to participate in the study. The remaining 75 patients who were eligible were randomized into DAA and PA groups. Thirty-seven patients were initially randomized to receive DAA THA, but two did not and were excluded, resulting in 48% (35 of 73) of patients who received DAA THA; 52% (38 of 73) of patients were randomized into and received PA THA. Over a minimum 5 years of follow-up, 3% (1 of 35) of DAA patients were lost to follow-up, and none of the patients undergoing PA THA were lost. A per-protocol analysis was adopted, resulting in further patients being excluded from analysis. Of the 73 study patients, 99% (72; DAA: 35, PA: 37) were analyzed at 1 year, 95% (69; DAA: 34, PA: 35) were analyzed at 2 years, and 72% (52; DAA: 23, PA: 29) were analyzed at 5 years. The primary outcome was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and WOMAC score. Secondary outcomes included the EQ-5D and EQ-5D VAS scores, 10-meter walk test results, radiographic evidence of loosening (femoral: lucency > 2 mm at the implant-bone interface, subsidence > 2 mm; acetabular: migration or change in inclination), 5-year survivorship analysis from all-cause revisions, and surgical complications. The study was powered to detect a 10-point difference in the WOMAC score, which is equivalent to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). There were no differences in primary outcomes (OHS and WOMAC scores) or secondary outcomes (EQ-5D scores, EQ-5D VAS scores, and 10-meter walk test result) between the DAA and PA groups at the 5-year follow-up interval. The median (range) OHS at 5 years was 46 (16 to 48) for DAA and 47 (18 to 48) for PA groups (p = 0.93), and the median WOMAC score was 6 (0 to 81) for DAA and 7 (0 to 59) for PA groups (p = 0.96). The median EQ-5D score was 1 (0.1 to 1) for DAA and 1 (0.5 to 1) for PA groups (p = 0.45), and the median EQ-5D VAS score was 85 (60 to 100) for DAA and 95 (70 to 100) for PA groups (p = 0.29). There were no cases of component loosening on radiographs. There was no difference in component survival between the two approaches at 5 years (DAA: 97% [95% CI 85% to 100%] versus PA: 97% [95% CI 87% to 100%]). Eight of 23 patients in the DAA group reported decreased sensation in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve distribution. DAA and PA are both effective approaches in performing primary THA. Each approach has its associated risks and complications. The choice of THA should be based on individual patient factors, surgeon experience, and shared decision-making. Early registry data indicate DAA and PA THA are comparable, but longer-term data with larger numbers of patients will be required before one can safely conclude equal survivorship between both approaches. Level I, therapeutic study.

Symptomatic aseptic loosening of a short humeral stem following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

The rate of aseptic humeral component loosening with standard-length stems is historically so low (0.3%) that presence of humeral loosening was given substantial weight in defining periprosthetic shoulder infection by the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) in 2018. This study aims to confirm that the historically low rate of humeral stem aseptic loosening is not affected by the adoption of a novel short humeral stem. Following institutional review board approval, this retrospective multi-institutional study was undertaken. A review of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) cases at 3 institutions provided 184 shoulders that received TSA with a grit-blasted, rectangular short humeral stem without ingrowth coating (Univers Apex; Arthrex). The average patient age was 62.1 years (range: 30-84), and 57.1% (105/184) were male. One-year radiographic follow-up was achieved in 64.7%. Patient clinical charts were reviewed for onset of newly painful shoulders, radiographic evidence of loosening, and return to the operating room for any reason. All patients with concern for clinically significant humeral loosening underwent workup for periprosthetic shoulder infection. Immediate postoperative films were reviewed to identify any differences in prosthetic canal fit. The definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection used was provided by the recent ICM shoulder guidelines. Twenty-three (12.5%) patients presented with a painful shoulder and radiographic concern for potential humeral loosening at a mean follow-up of 1.5 years (range: 1.5 months-3.4 years). Thirteen (7.1%) of these underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty where a loose stem was confirmed. All revisions underwent tissue culture, and 3 cases were consistent with probable or possible periprosthetic infection at the time of revision arthroplasty. The rate of symptomatic aseptic humeral loosening in this series was 10.9% (20/184), with 5.4% undergoing revision surgery. Patients with symptomatic aseptic humeral loosening were more likely to be male (90.5%) than those patients without symptoms (52.8%, P < .001). There were no differences in canal fit between patients with concern for symptomatic loosening and those with pain-free, stable implants. In this multisurgeon, multicenter study, the early humeral loosening rate for this stem design far outpaces previously reported rates, and this study likely under-reports the true incidence of clinically significant loosening as it only contains limited short-term follow-up. The perception that humeral loosening is nearly pathognomonic for periprosthetic shoulder infection should be reconsidered for certain short humeral stem designs.

Primary Tritanium acetabular components have increased rates of radiolucency associated with inferior clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up.

Cementless fixation is the standard for acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). There are various surface finishes thought to improve osteointegration, although literature regarding the long-term survival of some of these surfaces is limited. Regardless of design, primary stability is essential to allow for osteointegration. Previous studies have suggested an increased rate of radiolucency and compromised short-term functional outcomes using the Tritanium primary acetabular component (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). The purpose of this study was to compare the primary Tritanium acetabular component to another contemporary acetabular component as a control group with an established clinical record. 444 consecutive, primary THAs performed by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2012 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Implant survivorship and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) were recorded for all patients at final follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated by 2 surgeons at 6 weeks, 1 year, and the most recent follow-up for evidence of radiolucency and migration. Components were considered to have evidence of radiographic lucency if they had radiolucency in 2 or more DeLee zones. 198 patients met criteria for inclusion (96 Pinnacle, 102 Tritanium). Average follow-up was 28 (12-72) months. At final follow-up 6.2% of the Pinnacle cups and 29.4% of the Tritanium cups had radiographic evidence of loosening (p < 0.01). The average mHHS for the Tritanium group was 83.1, and 88.4 for the Pinnacle group (p < 0.01). Radiographic evidence of loosening also correlated with a lower mHHS: 75.5 versus 86.4 (p < 0.01). In patients that received Tritanium cups without screw fixation 44.6% showed radiographic evidence of loosening versus 8% that received screw fixation (p < 0.01). In total, 6 patients in the Tritanium group required revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The 30% rate of radiographic loosening in the Tritanium group was significantly higher than the Pinnacle group and correlated with an inferior clinical outcome. Interestingly the use of screw augmentation was protective against radiographic evidence of loosening. This suggests that the Tritanium component may be prone to fibrous in-growth because of inadequate primary stability.

Contemporary Porous Titanium Acetabular Components for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Pelvic Radiation

BackgroundPatients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) following pelvic radiation have historically had poor survivorship free of aseptic acetabular component loosening. However, several series have reported improved results with tantalum acetabular components. The purpose of this study is to assess implant survivorship, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of contemporary, porous titanium acetabular components in the setting of prior pelvic radiation. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 33 patients (38 hips) with prior pelvic radiation between 2006 and 2016 who underwent primary THA. The mean overall pelvic radiation dose was 6300 cGy with a mean latency period to THA of 5 years. The most common acetabular component was Pinnacle (DePuy Synthes) in 76%. Eight-seven percent of cups were fixed with screws. The mean age at primary THA was 74 years, 76% were male, and the mean body mass index was 30 kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 5 years. ResultsThe 10-year survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening, free of any revision, and free of any reoperation were 100%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, when accounting for death as a competing risk. There were 3 revisions; one each for taper corrosion, recurrent dislocation, and infection. Radiographically, all cups had evidence of osteointegration and none had radiographic evidence of loosening. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 50 to 84 postoperatively (P < .0001). ConclusionContemporary porous titanium acetabular components with supplemental screws provided excellent implant fixation in patients with prior therapeutic pelvic radiation. At 10 years, 100% of these components were free of revision for aseptic loosening and 100% were radiographically well-fixed. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Therapeutic.

Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements

PurposeUnicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has substantial benefits over total knee replacement (TKR) but has higher revision rates. The cementless Oxford UKR was introduced to address this but there are concerns about fixation and tibial plateau fractures. The first long-term study of the device with clinical and radiographic outcomes is reported.MethodsThe first 1000 medial cementless Oxford UKR were prospectively identified and followed up by independent physiotherapists. Survival was calculated using the endpoints reoperation, revision, revision to TKR, major revision requiring revision TKR components and patient mortality. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Tegner Activity Score and American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were recorded and radiographs analysed.ResultsThe ten year survival was 96.6% (CI 94.8–97.8), 97.5% (CI 95.7–98.5), 98.9% (CI 97.7–99.4) and 99.6% (CI 98.8–99.9) using reoperation, revision, revision to TKR and major revision as the endpoint, respectively. Commonest causes for revision were bearing dislocation (n = 7, 0.7%), disease progression (n = 4, 0.4%) and pain (n = 2, 0.2%). There was one lateral tibial plateau fracture and one femoral component loosening. At 10 years, the mean OKS was 41.2 (SD 9.8), Tegner 2.8 (SD 1.3), AKSS-O 89.1 (SD 13.0) and AKSS-F 80.4 (SD 14.6). There were no pathological radiolucencies or complete radiolucent lines. There were no implant-related deaths.ConclusionsThe cementless Oxford UKR is a safe procedure with excellent long-term clinical results. Our results suggest that reliable fixation was achieved with only one (0.1%) revision for loosening (femoral), no radiographic evidence of loosening in the remaining cases and no fractures related to implantation.Level of evidenceIII.

Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes

BackgroundEhlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are connective tissue disorders that cause defects in collagen synthesis or processing, resulting in joint hypermobility. Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), concern exists that hypermobility will affect the outcome as prosthesis relies on soft tissues for stability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcome of TKA in the setting of EDS compared to patients undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis (OA). MethodsWe identified 16 patients (20 knees) with EDS who underwent a TKA between 2001 and 2016. Patients were matched 1:2 (n = 40) on age, gender, body mass index, and surgical date to patients undergoing TKA for OA. ResultsWe found no difference in age, body mass index, or follow-up between the cohorts (P > .05). EDS patients had significantly more surgical interventions prior to TKA (P = .03) and were more likely to require constrained components (x2 = 0.002). Following TKA, 4 patients in the EDS group and 9 patients in the matched cohort underwent a reoperation for any reason including 1 revision in the EDS cohort and 3 in the OA cohort. We found no significant difference in reoperation or revision rates between the cohorts (P > .05). There was no difference in Knee Society Scores between groups at last follow-up (P = .63) or radiographic evidence of loosening. ConclusionAlthough patients with EDS were more likely to require a constrained component, they are not at increased risk of revision or reoperation following TKA in the intermediate term.

Independent assessment and outcomes of 196 short-tapered stems short-term follow-up and review of the literature.

Longer term outcome data are now becoming available for short-tapered femoral stems for cementless total hip arthroplasty. The shorter stem has a metaphyseal fit, loading the bone in this area, leading to physiological bone remodelling. It is also bone preserving, as it is 35 mm shorter. It may be easier to insert through a smaller incision and potentially reduce complication rates. We present a retrospective single surgeon case series of 196 patients (>53% follow-up over 5 years). All patients had the cementless 'Microplasty Taperloc' (Biomet). Primary outcome measures were femoral component revision rates. Secondary outcome measures included complications, patient-reported functional outcome scores (Oxford hip) and radiographic evidence of loosening. Patients were identified using electronic software. All were routinely followed up and assessed in clinic since implant introduction in 2009. Oxford hip scores were routinely obtained. A surgeon who had not carried out the procedure independently assessed radiographs. One hundred ninety-six patients were identified. The revision rate was 0.5% due to an intraoperative peri-prosthetic fracture of the femur identified on post-operative radiograph. The complication rate was 2%, attributable to: subsidence of the prosthesis (one hip), post-operative dislocation (two hips), one of which required acetabular revision. Oxford hip scores increased on average from 21 to 45 (pre- to post-operatively). There were no signs of radiographic loosening. The results show that using the short-tapered stem is proving so far to be a reliable and safe alternative to its longer counterpart, with low complication rates in the short term.

Two-centre radiological survivorship of acetabular distraction technique for treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity: mean five-year follow-up.

Aims The aim of this study was to examine the results of the acetabular distraction technique in achieving implantation of a stable construct, obtaining biological fixation, and producing healing of chronic pelvic discontinuity at revision total hip arthroplasty. Patients and Methods We identified 32 patients treated between 2006 and 2013 who underwent acetabular revision for a chronic pelvic discontinuity using acetabular distraction, and who were radiographically evaluated at a mean of 62 months (25 to 160). Of these patients, 28 (87.5%) were female. The mean age at the time of revision was 67 years (44 to 86). The patients represented a continuous series drawn from two institutions that adhered to an identical operative technique. Results Of the 32 patients, one patient required a revision for aseptic loosening, two patients had evidence of radiographic loosening but were not revised, and three patients had migration of the acetabular component into a more stable configuration. Radiographically, 22 (69%) of the cohort demonstrated healing of the discontinuity. The Kaplan-Meier construct survivorship was 83.3% when using revision for aseptic acetabular loosening as an endpoint. At the time when one patient failed due to aseptic loosening (at 7.4 years), there were a total of seven patients with a follow-up of seven years or longer who were at risk of failure. Conclusion The acetabular distraction technique demonstrates encouraging radiographic outcomes, with healing of the discontinuity in over two-thirds of our series. This surgical technique permits biological fixation and intraoperative customization of the construct to be implanted based on the pattern of the bone loss identified following component removal. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:909-14.

Custom Triflange Acetabular Components for Large Acetabular Defects: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Compromise of bony support presents a difficult problem in acetabular revision surgery. Although various methods have been proposed to cope with this problem, they have had variable results and little long-term follow-up. The authors reviewed the results of 37 patients undergoing custom triflange revision surgery. Two patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 35 patients with minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Thirty-two (91%) of 35 components were unrevised and functioning well at minimum 10-year follow-up. One component placed for pelvic discontinuity loosened at 12 years after surgery but was converted to a conventional total hip. One component had failure of 3 ischial screws at 6 months; however, at 11 years, the patient had no additional clinical or radiographic evidence of loosening. The average Harris hip score was 28 preoperatively and 90 postoperatively. Two components (6%) were removed for infection. There were no dislocations, fractures, or nerve injuries. Revision of large acetabular defects with a custom triflange component resulted in reliably good to excellent results at minimum 10-year follow-up. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e316-e320.].

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus.

The aim of this study was to analyze the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus in association with rotator cuff deficiency or severe stiffness of the shoulder. A total of 38 patients were included: 28 women and ten men. Their mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 73 years (54 to 91). Before the RSA, 18 patients had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation following a fracture. A total of 22 patients had a rotator cuff tear and 11 had severe stiffness of the shoulder with < 0° of external rotation. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (1.5 to 10). The Constant score and the range of movement of the shoulder were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. Preoperatively, radiographs in two planes were performed, as well as CT or arthro-CT scans; radiographs were also performed at final follow-up. The mean Constant score improved from 25 points (5 to 47) preoperatively to 57 points (15 to 81) postoperatively. The mean forward elevation of the shoulder increased from 73° (10° to 130°) preoperatively to 117° (15° to 170°) postoperatively. Previous surgery did not influence the outcome. Patients with rotator cuff tears had lower Constant scores than patients without (p = 0.037). Those with preoperative stiffness of the shoulder had lower postoperative external rotation compared with patients without stiffness (p = 0.046). There was no radiographic evidence of loosening. Three complications occurred, leading to revision surgery in two patients. In all, 17 patients rated their result as very good (45%), another 17 as good (45%), two as satisfactory (5%), and two as unsatisfactory (5%). RSA is an effective form of treatment for patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus associated with rotator cuff deficiency or stiffness of the shoulder, with high rates of satisfaction. Rotator cuff tears and stiffness of the shoulder had an adverse effect on the clinical outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:318-23.

Acetabular Revision Using Trabecular Metal Augments for Paprosky Type 3 Defects

BackgroundTrabecular Metal (TM) augments are one option when reconstructing bone loss during acetabular side revision surgery. MethodsWe studied 38 consecutive patients with Paprosky type 3 defects that were revised using a TM shell and one or more augments over a 6-year period. There were 29 Paprosky type 3A defects and 9 Paprosky type 3B defects. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 68.2 years (range 48-84). The mean length of follow-up was 36 months (range 18-74). ResultsThe mean preoperative short form 12 health survey improved from 27.7 before operation to 30.1 at the time of final follow-up (P = .001). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score improved from 53 preoperatively to a mean of 78.8 at final follow-up (P < .0001). There was evidence of radiographic loosening in 7 of the cup-augment constructs. One patient developed a deep infection requiring re-revision. Two patients required revision for aseptic loosening. ConclusionThe use of TM in complex acetabular reconstruction is associated with good outcome in the short to medium term.

Line-to-Line Reaming of Highly Porous Acetabular Components Improves Position and Reduces Variability of Component Placement

AbstractAccurate and precise acetabular component position in total hip arthroplasty remains challenging even for experienced, high-volume surgeons. Some variability may result from the press-fit technique of cementless components and maybe magnified by the use of highly porous cups with high-friction surfaces. The purpose of this study is to investigate the acetabular component positioning of a hemispherical, highly porous cup with line-to-line reaming compared with press-fit techniques. A retrospective cohort study was performed of 110 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon using a highly porous acetabular component. Half of the patients had the component implanted with a line-to-line reaming technique and the other half were implanted using a 1 mm press-fit technique. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for component positioning and loosening at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively by two independent surgeons. Records were reviewed for subsequent surgery. There were no differences between the groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index, operative side, or acetabular component size. The press-fit group had an average abduction angle of 49.4 ± 5° and anteversion of 20.6 ± 7°. The line-to-line group had an average abduction angle of 45.02° [standard deviation (SD) 4.58] and anteversion of 25.42° (SD 4.44) and were statistically different from the press-fit group (p &lt; 0.01). There was significantly less variability in the line-to-line group with respect to anteversion (F-test, p &lt; 0.01) compared with the press-fit group. At most recent follow-up, there were no dislocations, revisions for any reason, or radiographic evidence of loosening in either group. Line-to-line reaming for highly porous cups can improve component positioning and reduce variability compared with press-fit techniques with no difference in fixation or other clinical outcome parameters.

"Shaped" humeral head autograft reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Treatment for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with significant posterior glenoid bone loss (B2, B3, and Ctype).

Posterior glenoid bone loss in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) presents achallenge when considering replacement surgery. Results with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty are unpredictable due to posterior humeral instability and limited bone stock for glenoid component fixation. To describe and evaluate the results of a"shaped" humeral head autograft with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for the treatment of primary GHOA with significant posterior glenoid bone loss and an intact, functional rotator cuff. We retrospectively reviewed 29 "shaped" humeral head autografts with RSA for the treatment of GHOA with B2 (n= 16), B3 (n= 10), or C (n= 3) glenoid morphology based on the Walch classification system. Average glenoid retroversion was 32.3°. Humeral head autografts were "shaped" to match each patient's individual glenoid morphology. Functional outcome scores, range of motion, strength, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. At average follow-up of 34.6months (range 23.7-88.9months), significant improvements were seen in all functional outcome scores, ranges of motion, and strength (p<0.01). No recurrent instability or glenoid fixation failure occurred. Two complications (1superficial and 1deep infection) in 2patients were identified. All autografts incorporated without radiographic evidence of loosening. Scapular notching was observed in 8shoulders. No negative correlations were identified with glenoid morphology. "Shaped" humeral head autograft with RSA for the treatment of primary GHOA with significant posterior glenoid bone loss is associated with excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes and alow complication profile at short- to mid-term follow-up.

Radiographic assessment of distal femur cemented stems in tumor endoprostheses.

Distal femoral endoprosthesis (DFE) has become the optimal method of reconstruction in the skeletally mature patients treated for malignant bone tumor. Albeit literature has reported wide range of aseptic loosening in cemented components (6-32%), few authors showed that cement was not detrimental to long-term success of primary distal femoral implants possibly relating to cementing technique. A series of consecutive of DFE (MRS and GMRS, Styker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) was retrospectively reviewed for evidence of loosening on plain radiographs. All prostheses had the standard straight 127-mm stem and a cemented polyethylene tibial component. Cementing technique involved reaming line to line to the selected stem size and cementing without pressurization. Radiographs were assessed by two independent blinded reviewers and scored for radiolucent zones (>1mm) and graded as not loose, possibly, probable and definite loose. Furthermore, the final reamer/stem diameters, length of resection, tumor type, adjuvant treatment modalities, bushing exchange/revision surgery and infection rate were recorded. There were 70 patients and none were lost to follow-up. The average radiographic follow-up was 7.2years (58% had f/u >5years). Examiner A found 89% of femoral components to be "Not Loose" and 11% (n=6) "Possibly Loose". Examiner B found 96% of femoral components to be "Not Loose" and 4% (n=2) to be "Possibly Loose". No components scored as probably or definitely loose. Two DFE stems were reported as "Possibly Loose" by both reviewers. No femoral stem required revisions for either loosening, femur fracture or metal failure. Although infection was frequent, there was no septic loosening. Despite our study limitations, no radiographic evidence of loosening was found. Cementing distal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin and inconsistent cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term.