BackgroundThis prospective bicentric study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intradiscal radiofrequency biacuplasty (IDB) versus conservative management (CM) in treating chronic discogenic low back pain (CDLBP).MethodsForty-four patients with CDLBP were randomly assigned to either the biacuplasty group or the conservative management group. The biacuplasty group received treatment with two radiofrequency (RF) needles, positioned bilaterally on the annulus fibrosus under fluoroscopic guidance and local anaesthesia, to administer bipolar RF. Patients were monitored for 6 months, with the allowance of pain medication as needed. In the conservative management group, patients who continued to experience low back pain after three months were permitted to switch to the biacuplasty group. The study was conducted over two years, starting on July 1, 2020.ResultsThe studied groups had comparable age and gender distributions, with no significant difference in BMI. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. At baseline, no significant difference was observed between the groups (p = 0.263). However, at the 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up, the biacuplasty group exhibited significantly lower ODI scores compared to the conservative management group (all p < 0.001), indicating that biacuplasty was more effective in reducing disability caused by chronic low back pain.ConclusionsIntradiscal radiofrequency biacuplasty is a minimally invasive interventional technique that has proven effective for patients with CDLBP who do not respond to conservative management.
Read full abstract